Right Ventricular Septal Pacing: The Success of Stylet-Driven Active-Fixation Leads

Background: The detrimental effects of right ventricular (RV) apical pacing on left ventricular function has driven interest in alternative pacing sites and in particular the mid RV septum and RV outflow tract (RVOT). RV septal lead positioning can be successfully achieved with a specifically shaped stylet and confirmed by the left anterior oblique (LAO) fluoroscopic projection. Such a projection is neither always used nor available during pacemaker implantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate how effective is the stylet-driven technique in septal lead placement guided only by posterior-anterior (PA) fluoroscopic view.
Methods: One hundred consecutive patients with an indication for single- or dual-chamber pacing were enrolled. RV septal lead positioning was attempted in the PA projection only and confirmed by the LAO projection at the end of the procedure.
Results: The RV lead position was septal in 90% of the patients. This included mid RV in 56 and RVOT in 34 patients. There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites . In the RVOT, 97% (34/35) of leads were placed on the septum, whereas in the mid RV the value was 89% (56/63).
Conclusions: The study confirms that conventional active-fixation pacing leads can be successfully and safely deployed onto the RV septum using a purposely-shaped stylet guided only by the PA fluoroscopic projection. (PACE 2010; 49–53)     

The right ventricular outflow tract: the road to septal pacing

BACKGROUND: Pacing from the right ventricular apex is associated with long-term adverse effects on left ventricular function. This has fuelled interest in alternative pacing sites, especially the septal aspect of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). However, it is a common perception that septal RVOT pacing is difficult to achieve. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this article, we will review the anatomy of the RVOT and discuss the importance of standard radiographic views and the 12-lead electrocardiogram in aiding lead placement. We will also describe a method utilizing a novel stylet shape, whereby a conventional active-fixation, stylet-driven lead can be easily and reliably deployed onto the RVOT septum.     

Right ventricular outflow tract pacing: radiographic and electrocardiographic correlates of lead position

OBJECTIVE: To characterize the pacing site in an unselected series of patients undergoing right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) lead placement and investigate the role of the electrocardiogram (ECG) in predicting implantation. BACKGROUND: Right ventricular apical pacing is associated with long-term adverse effects on left ventricular function, fuelling interest in alternative pacing sites, especially the RVOT. Previous studies have been conflicting, possibly due to poor definition of pacing site within the RVOT. METHODS: In 150 patients undergoing pacemaker implantation, implanters were asked to place the lead in the RVOT. Radiographs were performed in the antero-posterior (AP) and 40 degrees right and left anterior-oblique projections post procedure. Fifty-six had left lateral radiographs. Lead position was categorized using AP/RAO (right anterior oblique) to confirm RVOT placement and left anterior oblique to distinguish free wall from septum. A 12-lead ECG was performed during ventricular pacing. RESULTS: Leads were below the RVOT in 18. Of the remaining 132, the majority (94%) were in the inferior/low RVOT. Eighty-one out of 132 were septal and 51 free wall. Septal sites were associated with shorter QRS duration (134 ms vs 143 ms, P < 0.02). Free wall sites displayed more frequent notching of the inferior leads (P < 0.01). A negative deflection in lead I provided a positive predictive value of 90% for septal sites. In those with lateral radiographs, a posteriorly projected lead was 100% specific for septal placement. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the heterogeneity of lead placement within the RVOT. Septal and free wall sites display characteristic ECG patterns which may be used to aid placement. The left lateral radiograph is useful in confirming a true septal location.     

Right Ventricular Septal Pacing: A Comparative Study of Outflow Tract and Mid Ventricular Sites

Background: Prolonged right ventricle (RV) apical pacing is associated with left ventricle (LV) dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. Alternative RV pacing sites with a narrower QRS compared to RV pacing might reflect a more physiological and synchronous LV activation. The purpose of this study was to compare the QRS morphology, duration, and suitability of RV outflow tract (RVOT) septal and mid‐RV septal pacing. Methods: Seventeen consecutive patients with indication for dual‐chamber pacing were enrolled in the study. Two standard 58‐cm active fixation leads were passed to the RV and positioned in the RVOT septum and mid‐RV septum using a commercially available septal stylet (model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). QRS duration, morphology, and pacing parameters were compared at the two sites. The RV lead with less‐satisfactory electrical parameters was withdrawn and deployed in the right atrium. Results: Successful positioning of the pacing leads at the RVOT septum and mid‐RV septum was achieved in 15 patients (88.2%). There were no significant differences in the mean stimulation threshold, R‐wave sensing, and lead impedance between the two sites. The QRS duration in the RVOT septum was 151 ± 14 ms and in the mid‐RV septum 145 ± 13 ms (P = 0.150). Conclusions: This prospective observational study shows that septal pacing can be reliably achieved both in the RVOT and mid‐RV with active fixation leads using a specifically shaped stylet. There are no preferences in regard to acute lead performance or paced QRS duration with either position. (PACE 2010; 33:1169–1173)     

Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Septal Pacing: Long-Term Follow-Up of Ventricular Lead Performance

Background: The detrimental effects of right ventricular apical pacing on left ventricular function has driven interest in selective site pacing, predominantly on the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) septum. There is currently no information on long-term ventricular lead electrical performance from this site.
Methods: A total of 100 patients with ventricular lead placement on the RVOT septum undergoing pacemaker implantation for bradycardia indications were analyzed retrospectively. Lead positioning was confirmed with the use of fluoroscopy. Long-term (1 year) follow-up was obtained in 92 patients. Information on stimulation threshold, R-wave sensing, lead impedance, and lead complications were collected.
Results: Lead performance at the RVOT septal position was stable in the long term. Ventricular electrical parameters were acceptable with stable long-term stimulation thresholds, sensing, and impedance for all lead types. One-year results demonstrated mean stimulation threshold of 0.71 ± 0.25 V, mean R wave of 12.4 ± 6.05 mV, and mean impedance values of 520 ± 127 Ω. There were no cases of high pacing thresholds or inadequate sensing.
Conclusions: This study confirms satisfactory long-term performance with leads placed on the RVOT septum, comparable to traditional pacing sites. It is now time to undertake studies to examine the long-term hemodynamic effects of RVOT septal pacing.     

Pacing from the Right Ventricular Septum: Is There a Danger to the Coronary Arteries?

Background: Pacing from right ventricular (RV) septal sites has been suggested as an alternative to RV apical pacing in an attempt to avoid long-term adverse consequences on left ventricular function. Concern has been raised as to the relationship of the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) to pacing leads in these positions.
Methods and Results: We retrospectively analyzed three cases in which patients with RV active-fixation leads in situ also had coronary angiography. Multiple fluoroscopic views were used to determine the relationship of the lead tip at various pacing sites to the coronary arteries. A lead placed on the anterior wall was in close proximity to the LAD, whereas septal and free wall positioning was not.
Conclusion: Placement of RV active-fixation leads on the septum avoids potential coronary artery compromise.     

Alternate site right ventricular pacing: defining template scoring

Background: Prolonged right ventricular (RV) apical pacing produces dysynchronous ventricular contraction, which may result in left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, whereas septal pacing sites might reflect a more synchronous LV activation. This study examined a method of evaluating alternate RV pacing sites using a template scoring system based on measuring the angle of lead attachment in the 40^o left anterior oblique (LAO) fluoroscopic view and its effect on altering the loop of lead in the RV. Methods: Twenty‐three consecutive patients for RV pacing were enrolled. Conventional active fixation leads were positioned in either the RV outflow tract (RVOT) or mid RV using a stylet designed for septal placement (Model 4140, St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, MN, USA). Using LAO cine fluoroscopy, a generous loop of lead was inserted into the RV chamber and the change in angle of attachment determined. Results: Successful positioning of pacing leads at the RVOT septum (18 patients) and mid‐RV septum (five patients) was achieved. With introduction of more lead into the RV chamber, the angle of attachment in the LAO projection altered over a range of 6^o–32^o for all patients with a mean of 14.6 ± 6.6^o. In 87% of patients, the range was predominantly within the same template score with only minor overlap into another zone. Conclusions: This study shows that the angle of lead attachment in the RV is altered by introducing more lead, but in most cases, the template score remains the same. Further studies are required to determine the accuracy and efficacy of the templates. (PACE 2011; 34:1080–1086)     

The Road to Right Ventricular Septal Pacing: Techniques and Tools

Prolonged right ventricular (RV) apical pacing is associated with progressive left ventricular dysfunction due to dysynchronous ventricular activation and contraction. RV septal pacing allows a narrower QRS compared to RV apical pacing, which might reflect a more physiological and synchronous ventricular activation. Previous clinical studies, which did not consistently achieve RV septal pacing, were not confirmatory and need to be repeated. This review summarizes the anatomy of the RV septum, the radiographic appearances of pacing leads in the RV, the electrocardiograph correlates of RV septal lead positioning, and the techniques and tools required for implantation of an active‐fixation lead onto the RV septum. Using the described techniques and tools, conventional active‐fixation leads can now be reliably secured to either the RV outflow tract septum or mid‐RV septum with very low complication rates and good long‐term performance. Even though physiologic and hemodynamic studies on true RV septal pacing have not been completed, the detrimental effects of long‐term RV apical pacing are significant enough to suggest that it is now time to leave the RV apex and secure all RV leads onto the septum. (PACE 2010; 888–898)     

Localization of precise origin of idiopathic ventricular tachycardia from the right ventricular outflow tract by a 12-lead ECG: a study of pace mapping using a multielectrode "basket" catheter

Radiofrequency catheter ablation guided by pace-mapping techniques has proven effective in eliminating idiopathic ventricular tachycardia (VT) originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT). A method for rapidly identifying the origin of VT from 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) findings would be helpful for the catheter ablation procedure. The purpose of this study is to precisely localize the origin of idiopathic VT from the RVOT by a 12-lead ECG from a study of multipoint pace mapping. In one patient with premature ventricular complex (PVC) and 3 with VT, a "basket" catheter was deployed in the RVOT for bipolar pacing from 56 sites in the endocardium of RVOT. Under fluoroscopy the pacing sites were classified into the septum and free wall. We investigated the QRS morphology in leads, I, II, and III; the depth of the QS wave in leads aVR and aVL; and the height of the initial r wave in leads V1 and V2. Pacing was captured in 30-47 of 56 sites (54%-84%). As the pacing sites changed from the anterior to posterior of the septum, the QS notch (-) type in lead I shifted through rs to R, while a shift from R type to rR' or Rr' was noted in leads II and III. As the pacing sites changed from the anterior to posterior of the free wall, lead I showed a shift from the QS notch (+) type to R, while a shift from rR' to Rr' (or rR' unchanged) was found in leads II and III. The depth of the QS wave in leads aVR and aVL showed a tendency for aVR to be deeper than aVL toward the posterolateral attachment of both the septum and free wall, whereas aVL tended to be deeper than aVR toward the anterior attachment. The initial r waves in V1 and V2 became greater as the pacing site was positioned at a higher or more posterior location. These findings may provide more precise and clinically useful diagnostic information on the site of the origin of idiopathic VT originating from the RVOT by a 12-lead ECG.     

Thresholds and Complications with Right Ventricular Septal Pacing Compared to Apical Pacing

Background: Right ventricular septal pacing has been proposed as an alternative to apical pacing. However, data concerning thresholds and requirement for lead repositioning with this technique are scant.
Methods: We reviewed data at implantation and follow-up of 362 consecutive recipients of the same model of active fixation lead (Medtronic 5076-58, Minneapolis, MN, USA) to avoid differences due to lead characteristics. Patients were divided into two groups according to whether the lead was positioned on the interventricular septum (n = 157) or at the right ventricular apex (n = 205). Thresholds, lead impedance, and requirement for lead repositioning were compared between groups at implantation and follow-up.
Results: There were no differences between the septal and apical groups in sensing and pacing thresholds or lead impedance, either at implantation or during a 24-month follow-up. In the septal group, the lead had to be repositioned in four patients (2.5%) due to lead dislodgement in two patients, acute threshold rise in one patient, and pericardial effusion in another patient (the lead had unintentionally been positioned on the anterior free wall in these last two patients). In the apical group, the lead had to be repositioned in eight patients (3.9%, P = 0.56) due to lead dislodgement in three patients and acute threshold rise in five patients.
Conclusions: Acute and chronic thresholds associated with septal pacing are similar to those observed with apical pacing, and risk of lead dislodgement is low. However, multiple radioscopic views must be used to avoid inadvertent positioning of the lead on the anterior free wall .     

Atrial Septal Pacing to Synchronize Atrial Depolarization in Patients with Delayed Interatrial Conduction

The current method of pacing the right atrium from the appendage or free wall is often the source of delayed intraatrial conduction and discoordinate left and right atrial mechanical function. Simultaneous activation of both atria with pacing techniques involving multisite and multilead systems is associated with suppression of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias and improved hemodynamics. In the present study we tested the hypothesis that pacing from a single site of the atrial septum can synchronize atrial depolarization. Five males and two females (mean age 58 ± 6 years) with drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied who were candidates for AV junctional ablation. All patients had broad P waves (118 ± 10 ms) on the surface ECG. Multipolar catheters were inserted and the electrograms from the high right atrium (HRA) and proximal, middle, and distal coronary sinus (CS) were recorded. The atrial septum was paced from multiple sites. The site of atrial septum where the timing between HRA and distal CS (d-CS) was ≤ 10 ms was considered the most suitable for simultaneous atrial activation. An active fixation atrial lead was positioned at this site and a standard lead was placed in the ventricle. The interatrial conduction time during sinus rhythm and AAT pacing and the conduction time from the pacing site to the HRA and d-CS during septal pacing were measured. Atrial septal pacing was successful in all patients at sites superior to the CS os near the fossa ovalis. During septal pacing the P waves were inverted in the inferior leads with shortened duration from 118 ± 10 ms to 93 ± 7 ms (P < 0.001), and the conduction time from the pacing site to the HRA and d-CS was 54.3 ± 6.8 ms and 52.8 ± 2.5 ms, respectively. The interatrial conduction time during AAT pacing was shortened in comparison to sinus rhythm (115 ± 18.9 ms vs 97.8 ± 10.3 ms, P < 0.05). In conclusion, simultaneous activation of both atria in patients with prolonged interatrial conduction time can be accomplished by pacing a single site in the atrial septum using a standard active fixation lead placed under electrophysiological study guidance. Such a pacing system allows proper left AV timing and may prove efficacious in preventing various supraventricular tachyarrhythmias.     

Safety and performance of a system specifically designed for selective site pacing

Introduction: In the right ventricle, selective site pacing (SSP) has been shown to avoid detrimental hemodynamic effects induced by right ventricular apical pacing and, in the right atrium, to prevent the onset of atrial fibrillation and to slow down disease progression. The purpose of our multicenter observational study was to describe the use of a transvenous 4‐French catheter‐delivered lead for SSP in the clinical practice of a large number of centers. Methods: We enrolled 574 patients in whom an implantable device was indicated. In all patients, SSP was achieved by using the Select Secure System? (Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA). Results: In 570 patients, the lead was successfully implanted. In 125 patients, atrial SSP was performed: in 75 (60%) the lead was placed in the interatrial septum, in 31 (25%) in the coronary sinus ostium, and in 19 (15%) in the Bachman bundle. Ventricular SSP was undertaken in 138 patients: in 105 (76%) the high septal right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) position was paced, in seven (5%) the high free‐wall RVOT, in 25 (18%) the low septal RVOT, and in one (1%) the low free‐wall RVOT. In the remaining 307 patients, the His zone was paced: in 87 (28%) patients, direct His‐bundle pacing and in 220 (72%) patients para‐hisian pacing was achieved. Adequate pacing parameters and a lead‐related complication rate of 2.6% were recorded during a follow‐up of 20 ± 10 months. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated that many sites, in the right atrium, in the right ventricle, and in His‐bundle region, can be paced using the Select Secure System?. (PACE 2011; 34:339–347)     

Using the Surface ECG to Identify Right Ventricular Pacing Lead Position: A Cautionary Tale

Chronic right ventricular (RV) apical pacing may lead to the development of heart failure in some patients. Although pacing of the RV septum has been proposed as an alternative, positioning a lead in the true septum has proven challenging. In addition to fluoroscopy at implant, it has been suggested that 12‐lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG) can be used to determine septal lead position; however, studies show this may be inaccurate. We present a case where a change in the ECG QRS axis late after pacemaker insertion with an active fixation lead highlights the difficulties of ECG localization of pacing leads.     

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Defibrillation Thresholds from the Right Ventricular Outflow Tract and the Right Ventricular Apex

Background: Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) pacing has been suggested to improve hemodynamics and to help prevent pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing from the RVOT is feasible and equivalent in terms of sensing and stimulation threshold. However, physicians have been reluctant to use RVOT pacing because of concerns that defibrillation efficacy might be adversely affected. To date, there have been no randomized-controlled trials published comparing the defibrillation threshold in leads implanted in the RVOT and the right ventricular apex (RVA).
Objective: The purpose of this study was to compare defibrillation thresholds (DFT) in the RVOT and RVA. Ventricular sensing and stimulation thresholds were also compared.
Methods: This prospective, randomized, multicenter study included 87 patients (70 males, age 69 ± 11 years). At implantation, the patient's ventricular implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead position was randomized to either the RVOT or RVA. A four-shock Bayesian up-down method was used to determine the DFT. Patients were followed for 3 months postimplant.
Results: DFTs were not significantly different in leads implanted in the RVOT (median 8.8 J [6.28, 12.9] vs. 7.9 J [6.20, 12.6], P = 0.65). Threshold and impedance measurements were stable in both RVOT and RVA groups from implant to follow-up. All ICD leads remained stable chronically at the 3-month follow-up.
Conclusion: DFTs in leads placed in the RVOT and RVA are comparable. RVOT ICD lead placement is safe and exhibits similar lead stability, threshold, and impedance measurements as the traditional RVA location.     

动态三维超声灰阶成像在犬心脏起搏电极置放中的初步应用

目的探讨动态三维超声灰阶成像引导犬心脏起搏电极精确定位的可行性.方法采用动态三维超声心动图(3-DE)为主要影像学监测技术,引导6例犬心包吊床模型右心室室间隔、右心室心尖、左心室室间隔及左心室心尖起搏电极置放.结果3-DE在较短时间内引导电极到达目标位置,减少了X线曝光的幅射时间和剂量.3-DE能清晰显示起搏电极与心脏特定结构及心内膜之间的空间位置关系.结论3-DE有助于心脏起搏电极的置放,具有潜在的临床应用前景.     

经永存左上腔静脉植入起搏电极导线的方法探讨

目的初步探讨经永存左上腔静脉植入起搏电极导线的方法。方法 4例永存左上腔静脉合并右上腔静脉缺如的缓慢性心律失常患者,经左上腔静脉植入右心房和右心室起搏电极导线,心房起搏电极固定于右心耳(4例),心室起搏电极分别固定至右心室间隔部(2例)或心尖部(2例)。术后当天、术后3个月及1年分别测试起搏电极参数。结果 4例患者均成功放置右心房(心耳处)和右心室(间隔部或心尖部)起搏电极导线,随访1年,起搏电极参数良好。结论经左上腔静脉植入起搏电极导线具有一定的挑战性,但通过适当的导丝塑形和操作,通常可将导线固定于右心房心耳部和右心室间隔部或心尖部。     

采用螺旋电极导线行右室流出道间隔部起搏的护理体会

目的探讨采用螺旋电极导线行右室流出道间隔部起搏的临床护理要点。方法以5例诊断为恶性心律失常的患者为研究对象,通过采用螺旋电极导线行右室流出道间隔部起搏的治疗方法,并对整个护理过程进行总结。结果 5例患者行右室流出道间隔部起搏后取得良好的治疗效果,无护理并发症发生。结论螺旋电极导线行右室流出道间隔部起搏与常规右室心尖部起搏相比较,更有利于患者双心室同步收缩,改善心功能,更符合人的生理状态。     

Permanent Left Atrial Pacing with a Specifically Designed Coronary Sinus Lead

This article reports the original use of a specifically designed coronary sinus (CS) lead for permanent left atrial (LA) pacing. The device is characterized by its distal end shape featuring a double 45° angulation. which ensures very close contact with the CS upper wall. The device was successfully implanted in 39 out of 40 patients (97.5%). The tip electrode was eventually positioned in the distal CS in 9 patients, in the middle CS in 21 patients, and close to the ostium in the proximal CS in 9 patients. The mean acute pacing threshold voltage was 0.9 ± 0.5 V with a mean impedance of 578 ± 144 Ω as measured in unipolar distal configuration at 0.5 ms pulse width (PW). The mean A wave amplitude was 3.5 ± 2.1 mV. Early lead dislodgment occurred only once (3%) when the tip electrode was placed in the distal or middle CS, but more often (4/9 cases) when it was placed in the proximal CS. After a mean follow-up duration of 14 ± 8.5 months, 35 of the 39 successfully implanted leads (89.7%) were still functional in terms of LA pacing and sensing. The mean chronic pacing threshold voltage was 1.5 ± 0.8 V and the mean A wave amplitude was 2.7 ± 1.6 mV. There were no lead related complications. In conclusion, the device proved to be safe and highly effective for permanent LA pacing, provided the distal tip could be positioned in the distal or middle part of the CS.     

Effects of proximal ventricular septal pacing on hemodynamics and ventricular activation

Recently the use of alternate site pacing to improve cardiac function in patients with bradyarrhythmias has increased. In the present study, hemodynamics of right ventricular septal pacing were studied in seven dogs. A bipolar screw-in lead and endocardial lead were placed in the proximal right ventricular septum and right ventricular apex, respectively. The right ventricle was paced from each site. A conductance catheter and Millar catheter were inserted into the left ventricle to determine the left ventricular pressure and the pressure-volume loop. Cardiac output was measured using the thermodilution method. In five of the seven dogs, ventricular activation was documented by isochronal epicardial activation mapping during each pacing mode. Mean arterial pressure and cardiac output during septal pacing were significantly higher than during apical pacing (110 +/- 17 mmHg vs 100 +/- 18 mmHg; 1.00 +/- 0.39 L/min vs 0.89 +/- 0.33 L/min). The positive dp/dt during septal pacing was significantly higher than during apical pacing (2137 +/- 535 mmHg/s vs 1911 +/- 404 mmHg/s). End-systolic elastance during septal pacing was significantly higher compared to apical pacing (13.1 +/- 0.3 mmHg/mL vs 8.9 +/- 4.0 mmHg/mL). The ventricular activation time during septal pacing was significantly shorter than during apical pacing. The epicardial maps generated during septal pacing were similar to those from atrial pacing. We conclude that hemodynamics and interventricular conduction are less disturbed by proximal right ventricular septal pacing than apical pacing in dogs with normal hearts.     

Pacing site in pacemaker dependency: is right ventricular septal lead position the answer?

The right ventricular apex has been the traditional site for lead placement in patients with atrioventricular block. Pacing at the right ventricular apex may have long-term deleterious effects on left ventricular (LV) function, promoting heart failure and increasing mortality. Pacing at the right ventricular septum has been proposed to minimize deterioration in LV function. Although experimental data suggest that septal pacing protects LV function, clinical studies have provided conflicting results. A recent large study in patients with heart block did not show a protective effect with septal pacing. Other pacing approaches are becoming increasingly relevant; however, prediction of what method should be employed in which patient is not currently possible. Other factors such as baseline LV function and associated co-morbidities impact LV function, irrespective of pacing site. Continued monitoring of cardiac function post-implant is therefore critical to ongoing care. An algorithm for managing patients with atrioventricular block is proposed.