Prevalence and distribution of cervical human papillomavirus genotypes in women with cytological results from Sichuan province,China

The epidemiologic characteristics of human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes vary by age, ethnicity, and geographic location, and the available data on HPV epidemiological characteristics with cytology results in Sichuan province are limited. Our research was conducted from June 2016 to July 2017. A total of 10 953 women getting HPV testing were enrolled. Liquid-based cytological and histological results were collected. The overall HPV infection rate was 24.1% in Sichuan province. The prevalence of high-risk HPV (hrHPV) was 19.9%. For hrHPV genotypes, HPV52 (15.5%) was the most prevalent genotype, followed by HPV16 (13.8%), HPV58 (13.3%), HPV51 (8.6%), HPV39 (8.1%), and HPV68 (7.8%). Among all HPV-positive women with a cytology or histology result, HPV16-positive women have the highest cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 1 (CIN1)+ prevalence (11.1%), followed by HPV18 and HPV33; HPV16-positive women also have the highest CIN2+ prevalence (9.3%), followed by HPV58 and HPV18. To date, this is the largest study done in the Sichuan province for HPV prevalence and subtype distribution with normal and abnormal cytological results. The age-specific prevalence in patients at gynecology clinics and other clinics is different. Besides, patients at the same age also have a different hrHPV prevalence and lrHPV prevalence. Our result revealed that in every 10 HPV16-positive women, there is approximately one women with CIN2, CIN3, or cervical cancer. A higher oncogenic potential of HPV58 than that of HPV52 was observed.     

Cervical infections by multiple human papillomavirus (HPV) genotypes: Prevalence and impact on the risk of precancerous epithelial lesions

A large proportion of human papillomavirus (HPV) infections is sustained by multiple genotypes. The effect of multiple infections on the risk of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and the potential efficacy of vaccine on these infections are controversial. We performed viral typing by SFP₁₀‐LIPA on a consecutive series of 1,323 women undergoing colposcopy, 69% of whom had cervical biopsy, and correlated CIN severity with the type and number of HPVs. Overall prevalence of HPV‐DNA was 68.9%, 97.3% in CIN1, and 98.1% in CIN≥2. HPV positivity correlated with younger age (35.9 vs. 37.3 years, P = 0.026) and history of CIN (P < 0.001). Multiple types were detected in 44.2% of cases, including 63.1% CIN1 and 80.8% CIN≥2. Twenty‐three different types were detected, HPV‐16, 31 and 52 being the most frequent. Infections by HPV‐6, 11, 16, or 18 occurred in 59.4% of CIN1 and 71.3% of CIN≥2. Number of viral types and class of oncogenic risk were linearly correlated with CIN severity (P < 0.0001) by univariate and multivariate analyses controlling for age and history of CIN. The effect of the number of HPV types was maintained after exclusion from the model of infections by HPV‐6, 11, 16, and 18. Frequency, distribution, and clinical correlates of multiple HPV infections highlight the importance of assessing individual types in the management and the prediction of outcome of women with abnormal baseline cytology and point to potential limitations in current vaccine strategies. J. Med. Virol. 81:703–712, 2009 © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Successful application of indirect in-situ polymerase chain reaction to tissues fixed in Bouin''s solution

AIMS: To evaluate the value of polymerase chain reaction-in situ hybridization (PCR-ISH) for the detection of human papillomaviruses (HPV) in paraffin sections of cervical biopsies fixed either in 10% formalin or in Bouin's solution. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analysed 40 biopsies from Italian women infected with the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV 1). In-situ hybridization techniques were performed with commercial biotinylated probes. The PCR-ISH was carried out by the 'hot start modification'. Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) was found in 23 of 40 patients (57. 5%); eight cases showed condylomatous features. Human papillomavirus was detected in 42.5% by ISH and in 65% by PCR-ISH. Sixty-nine per cent of positive biopsies contained HPV 16, 18, 31 and 33. HPV 6 and 11 were found only in condylomata acuminata samples. CONCLUSIONS: The results point to a high incidence of HPV infection as well as of CIN in HIV-positive patients. Human papillomavirus type 16 appears to be most frequently associated with CIN. Polymerase chain reaction-ISH is more sensitive than ISH in the detection and typing of HPV DNA both in clinical and in 'latent' infections. The two techniques yielded the same results with either formalin- or Bouin's-fixed material.     

Distribution and viral load of eight oncogenic types of human papillomavirus (HPV) and HPV 16 integration status in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma.

Current human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing using pooled probes, although sensitive, lacks specificity in predicting the risk of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2/3) progression. To evaluate selected HPV genotyping, viral load, and viral integration status as potential predictive markers for CIN progression, we performed HPV genotyping in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cervical tissue with cervical carcinoma (29 cases) and CINs (CIN 1, 27 cases; CIN 2, 28 cases; CIN 3, 33 cases). General HPVs were screened using consensus primers GP5+/GP6+ and PGMY09/11. HPV genotyping and viral load measurement were performed using quantitative real-time PCR for eight oncogenic HPV types (16, 18, 31, 33, 35, 45, 52, and 58). HPV 16 viral integration status was evaluated by measuring HPV 16 E2/E6 ratio. We observed that HPV DNA positivity increased in parallel with the severity of CINs and carcinoma, with 59% positivity in CIN 1, 68% in CIN 2, 76% in CIN 3, and 97% in carcinoma (P trend=0.004). The eight oncogenic HPV types were significantly associated with CIN 2/3 (81%) and carcinoma (93%) (odds ratio (OR), 15.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.67-39.76; P<0.0001) compared with the unknown HPV types (OR, 2.87; 95% CI, 0.89-9.22; P=0.08). HPV 16 was the predominant oncogenic HPV type in CIN 2/3 (51%) and carcinoma (71%) and integrated significantly more frequently in carcinoma than in CIN 2/3 (P=0.004). No significant differences in viral load were observed across the disease categories. Our findings suggest that selected genotyping for the eight oncogenic HPV types might be useful in separating women with a higher risk of CIN progression from those with a minimal risk. We also conclude that the HPV 16 integration status has potential to be a marker for risk assessment of CIN progression.     

High-risk HPV detection and concurrent HPV 16 and 18 typing with Abbott RealTime High Risk HPV test

BackgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of cervical cancer. Among the high-risk types, infection with HPV 16 and 18 is associated with significantly higher risk of disease progression, and consequently these two types together cause approximately 70% of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. Identification of HPV 16 and HPV 18 can provide valuable information for risk stratification and clinical management of patients infected with these two types in both ASC-US triage and primary screening in women over age 30. It may also be valuable in the assessment of HPV vaccine efficacy. Abbott RealTime High Risk (HR) HPV is a recently developed test for the detection of 14 high-risk HPV types with the ability to concurrently identify HPV 16 and 18.ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical performance of Abbott RealTime HR HPV test. Study design: Abbott RealTime HR HPV was evaluated with 253 cervical specimens obtained from patients with CIN 3 and 340 specimens from patients with cervical cancer to determine clinical sensitivity of the test and the prevalence of types 16 and 18. Additionally, 757 cervical specimens obtained from women 30 years of age or older with normal cytology in a general screening population were tested to determine high-risk HPV positivity rate.ResultsThe Abbott RealTime HR HPV test detected 97.2% (246/253) of CIN 3 specimens and 98.5% (335/340) of cancer specimens. HPV 16 was the most prevalent type in both CIN 3 (72.8%) and cancer specimens (64.5%). HPV 16 and 18 combined were detected in 78.9% of high-risk HPV positive CIN 3 and 84.8% of high-risk HPV positive cancer specimens. In specimens from women 30 years of age or older with normal cytology in a screening population, the HPV positivity rate was 6.5% (49/757).ConclusionsAbbott RealTime HR HPV is a highly sensitive test for detection of high-grade cervical disease and cancer. The HPV 16 and HPV 18 typing capability of the test offers the advantage of stratifying patients at greater risk of progression and may thus aid in better patient care and management.     

Evaluation of clinical performance of a novel urine-based HPV detection assay among women attending a colposcopy clinic

BackgroundHuman papillomavirus (HPV) testing in urine offers a convenient approach for cervical cancer screening but has previously suffered from limited clinical sensitivity.ObjectivesWe evaluated clinical performance of the prototype Trovagene HPV test, a novel polymerase chain reaction assay that targets the E1 region of the HPV genome and detects and amplifies short fragments of cell-free HPV DNA in urine.Study designWe conducted a pilot study among 72 women referred to colposcopy following abnormal screening. Participants provided a urine sample prior to clinician-collected cervical sampling and colposcopically-directed punch biopsy. Trovagene HPV test results on urine samples were compared with cervical and urine testing by Linear Array HPV Genotyping Test (LA-HPV) for detection of histologically-confirmed cervical precancerous lesions.ResultsThere was high concordance between urine samples tested by the Trovagene HPV test and corresponding cervical (87.5%) and urine (81.9%) samples tested by LA-HPV. The Trovagene HPV test had high sensitivity (92.3% for detecting CIN2/3, and 100% for CIN3), comparable to LA-HPV testing on cervical samples (96.0% and 100%, respectively), and higher than LA-HPV testing on urine samples (80.8% and 90.0%, respectively). In this referral population, the specificity of the Trovagene urine HPV test was non-significantly lower (29% for CIN2/3 and 25% for CIN3) than corresponding estimates of LA-HPV testing on cervical (36% and 28%, respectively) and urine (42% and 38%, respectively) samples.ConclusionsThis pilot study suggests that the Trovagene HPV test has high sensitivity for urine-based detection of cervical precancer and merits evaluation in larger studies.     

IgG antibodies to human papillomavirus 16, 52, 58, and 6 L1 capsids: case-control study of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in Japan

In Japan, human papillomavirus (HPV) 16, 52, and 58 are most commonly associated with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). By contrast, HPV6 is primarily associated with genital warts. This study was designed to evaluate the association between IgG antibody responses to common HPVs and the risk of CIN development within a Japanese population. CIN cases (n = 141) and controls (n = 109) were tested for cervical HPV DNA and serum IgG antibodies to L1 capsids of HPV16, 52, 58, and 6. Seropositivity to HPV16, 52, and 58 L1 capsids was significantly higher in CIN cases than in controls: 27%, 21%, and 31% versus 16%, 11%, and 11%, respectively (P < 0.05). HPV6 L1 seropositivity was not significantly associated with CIN lesions (P = 0.11). Presence of viral DNA for either HPV16, 52, or 58 correlated with a significant antibody response against the homologous L1 capsids but not heterologous L1 capsids. Furthermore, seropositivity to multiple types of HPV16, 52, and 58 was more strongly associated with an increased risk of CIN development than seropositivity to a single type (P for trend <0.001). These findings indicate that IgG antibodies to L1 capsids of HPV16, 52, and 58 represent an increased risk of CIN development, with antibodies to multiple types being indicative of a further increase in risk. The presence of CIN lesions in women with seropositivity to multiple types suggests that viral exposure to a given type may not be protective against infections by other types and subsequent CIN development.     

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3, coinfected with HPV-16 and -18--case report.

Recently, detection of human papillomavirus (HPV)mRNA expression was made possible by in situ hybridization. We described a patient with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3, showing a distinctive and rare form of co-infection with HPV type 16 and 18. HPV-16 was detected in high grade squamous intraepithelial neoplastic lesion (CIN 3) and HPV-18 was in low grade lesion just adjacent to the HPV-16 infected area. This case suggests that HPV infection may be one of the most responsible causative agents producing malignant transformation and two distinctive HPV types can also simultaneously infect the squamous epithelium of the uterine cervix.     

Feasibility study of a human papillomavirus E6 oncoprotein test for diagnosis of cervical precancer and cancer

In a feasibility study using a prototype, lateral-flow test for human papillomavirus type 16, 18, and/or 45 (HPV16/18/45) E6 oncoproteins, 51 of 75 (68%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] of 56 to 78%) of HPV16/18/45 DNA-positive specimens from women with a diagnosis of CIN3+ (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3+ or cervical cancer) tested positive for HPV16/18/45 E6 oncoprotein. None of 16 (95% CI of 0 to 37%) HPV16/18/45 DNA-positive cervical specimens from women with a negative or CIN1 diagnosis tested positive for HPV16/18/45 E6 oncoprotein.     

PCR analysis of the upstream regulatory region of human papillomavirus genomes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma.

AIMS--To test whether human papillomavirus (HPV) variants with large scale sequence alterations to the upstream regulatory region are present in cervical intraepithelial neoplasias (CIN) and cervical carcinomas. METHODS--New PCR based assays were designed specifically to detect large scale insertion/deletion alterations in the upstream regulatory region of HPV 16 and 18. The assays were applied to 24 cases of CIN and 34 cases of cervical carcinoma previously shown to contain these two high risk HPV types. RESULTS--No large scale sequence alterations were found in any of the HPV containing CIN or carcinomas. CONCLUSIONS--These negative findings suggest that major upstream regulatory region variants of HPV 16 and 18 do not contribute to most cervical neoplasms.     

Comparing triage algorithms using HPV DNA genotyping,HPV E7 mRNA detection and cytology in high-risk HPV DNA-positive women

BackgroundHigh-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA positive women require triage testing to identify those with high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia or cancer (≥CIN2).ObjectiveComparing three triage algorithms (1) E7 mRNA testing following HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 genotyping (E7 mRNA test), (2) HPV16/18 DNA genotyping and (3) cytology, for ≥CIN2 detection in hrHPV DNA-positive women.Study designhrHPV DNA-positive women aged 18–63 years visiting gynecology outpatient clinics were included in a prospective observational cohort study. From these women a cervical scrape and colposcopy-directed biopsies were obtained. Cervical scrapes were evaluated by cytology, HPV DNA genotyping by bead-based multiplex genotyping of GP5+6+-PCR-products, and presence of HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 E7 mRNA using nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) in DNA positive women for respective HPV types. Sensitivities and specificities for ≥CIN2 were compared between E7 mRNA test and HPV16/18 DNA genotyping in the total group (n = 348), and E7 mRNA test and cytology in a subgroup of women referred for non-cervix-related gynecological complaints (n = 133).ResultsSensitivity for ≥CIN2 of the E7 mRNA test was slightly higher than that of HPV16/18 DNA genotyping (66.9% versus 60.9%; ratio 1.10, 95% CI: 1.0002–1.21), at similar specificity (54.8% versus 52.3%; ratio 1.05, 95% CI: 0.93–1.18). Neither sensitivity nor specificity of the E7 mRNA test differed significantly from that of cytology (sensitivity: 68.8% versus 75.0%; ratio 0.92, 95% CI: 0.72–1.17; specificity: 59.4% versus 65.3%; ratio 0.91, 95% CI: 0.75–1.10).ConclusionFor detection of ≥CIN2 in hrHPV DNA-positive women, an algorithm including E7 mRNA testing following HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 DNA genotyping performs similar to HPV16/18 DNA genotyping or cytology.     

Human Papillomavirus types prevalence and their association with cervical dysplasia among HIV and non-HIV infected women attending reproductive health clinics in Eastern Kenya

BackgroundHuman Papillomavirus (HPV) causes over 99% of all cervical cancer globally. In 2019; it was responsible for 3,286 deaths in Kenya. Understanding the epidemiological distribution of HPV genotypes by cervical dysplasia and HIV infection is important in designing prevention strategy and management of cervical cancer.ObjectiveTo determine HPV genotypes prevalence and their distribution by cervical dysplasia, social-demographic and risk factors associated with cervical cancer among HIV-infected women aged 18–48 years seeking reproductive healthcare in Eastern Kenya.MethodsCervical specimens were obtained for cytology, HPV-genotyping, histology while social-demographic factors were collected using a questionnaire and analysed using Pearson chi-square test.Results317 womencases: 161(50.8%); control 156(49.2%), mean age: 34.3, range 18–46 years were recruited. Thirteen HPV genotypes associated with cervical dysplasia were: CIN1{cases: HPV81[12(3.8%), HPV11[2(0.6%); control: HPV53 and HPV66[1(0.3%)}, CIN2 {cases: HPV11, HPV16, HPV661(0.3%), HPV816(1.9%) and single case1(0.3%) of HPV9, HPV11, HPV16, HPV44, HPV66, HPV81 HPV88, HPV53 and HPV58; control: HPV81[2(0.6%)} and invasive cancer {cases: HPV16[1(0.3%) and HPV81[3(0.9%); control: HPV16 and HPV66[1(0.3%).ConclusionsCervical dysplasia was associated with more mixed-lr/hrHPV genotypes among HIV-infected than HIV-uninfected women. The finding adds to the pool of knowledge the epidemiological data required in determining the population at risk for cervical cancer.     

The performance of human papillomavirus DNA detection with type 16/18 genotyping by hybrid capture in primary test of cervical cancer screening: a cross-sectional study in 10,669 Chinese women

ObjectivesWe aimed to assess the performance of DH3 human papillomavirus (HPV) assay, a newly developed hybrid capture technique that detects 14 high-risk HPVs with type 16/18 genotyping, as a primary test in cervical cancer screening.MethodsIn total 11,356 Chinese women aged 21–65 years participated in a cervical cancer screening programme using cytology (Thinprep, Hologic) and HPV testing (Cobas 4800 Test, Roche). Residual samples were used to detect HPV by DH3 HPV.ResultsIn total 10,669 women with valid results were included in the study. Of those, 135 were diagnosed as CIN2+, and 83 were diagnosed as CIN3+; 1056 women (9.9%) were DH3 HPV-positive and 255 (2.4%) of those were 16/18-positive, while 990 (9.3%) women were Cobas HPV-positive and 243 (2.3%) of those were 16/18-positive. DH3 HPV was non-inferior to Cobas HPV in identifying CIN1− and CIN2+ using predetermined thresholds (both p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of DH3 HPV were 93.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 87.7–96.9), 91.2% (95%CI = 90.6–91.7), 12.0% (95%CI = 10.1–14.1) and 99.9% (95%CI = 99.8–100), respectively, similar to those of Cobas HPV (91.1%, 95%CI = 85.0–5.3; 91.8%, 95%CI = 91.2–92.3; 12.5%, 95%CI = 10.5–14.7; and 99.9%, 95%CI = 99.8–99.9, respectively), in identifying CIN2+ (all p > 0.05). When DH3 HPV and Cobas HPV were respectively used as primary testing in screening strategy, the performance of two strategies were similar in identifying CIN2+. The results were similar in identifying CIN3+.ConclusionOur data suggest that DH3 HPV performs similarly to Cobas HPV in identifying high-grade CIN in cervical cancer screening.     

人乳头状瘤病毒分型检测在宫颈细胞学诊断为ASCUS分层处理中的意义

目的 探讨人乳头状瘤病毒(human papillomavirus,HPV)分型检测在宫颈细胞学诊断为不典型鳞状细胞意义不明确(atypical squamous cell of undetermined significance.ASCUS)分层处理中的意义.方法 对184例宫颈细胞学诊断为ASCUS的患者,分别进行HPV检测和阴道镜下宫颈组织活检.结果 184例宫颈细胞学诊断为ASCUS的患者中,经组织病理学证实炎症112例(60.87%),CIN Ⅰ级33例(17.93%),CIN Ⅱ级17例(9.24%),CIN Ⅲ级8例(4.35%),宫颈鳞癌4例(2.17%),宫颈湿疣10例(5.43%).其中124例经检测呈高危型HPV(high-risk types HPV,HR-HPV)阳性,阳性率为67.39%(124/184),随后经病理学证实炎症66例(53.23%),CIN Ⅰ级22例(17.74%),CIN Ⅱ级16例(12.90%),CIN Ⅲ级8例(6.45%),宫颈鳞癌4例(3.23%),宫颈湿疣8例(6.45%).HPV阳性组CIN以上病变检出率明显高于HPV阴性组(P<0.003).结论对宫颈细胞学诊断为ASCUS的患者,建议作HPV检测,若HR-HPV阳性,则需进一步阴道镜下宫颈活检;若HPV阴性,酌情处理.     

Evaluation of a commercialized in situ hybridization assay for detecting human papillomavirus DNA in tissue specimens from patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma

To evaluate a commercialized in situ hybridization (ISH) assay for detecting human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA, we compared the ability of a new ISH probe, Inform HPV III (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ), to that of PCR assays to detect HPV DNA in cervical tissue specimens with normal cervix (20 cases), cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN; CIN 1, 27 cases; CIN 2, 28 cases; and CIN 3, 33 cases), and cervical carcinoma (29 cases). General HPV DNA was detected using consensus primer-mediated PCR assays. HPV genotyping was performed by using EasyChip HPV blot (King Car Yuan Shan Institute, I-Lan, Taiwan). HPV16 integration status (E2/E6 ratio) was determined by using quantitative real-time PCR. Our findings showed that the ISH and PCR had fair to good agreements in detecting HPV DNA across all CIN categories without significant differences (Kappa coefficient, 0.34 to 0.63; P = 0.13 to 1.0). However, ISH detected significantly fewer HPV-positive cases in carcinoma than PCR did (Kappa coefficient, 0.2; P = 0.03). Eleven cases with ISH⁻ PCR⁺ results had HPV types that can be detected by Inform HPV III. Five carcinoma cases with ISH⁻ PCR⁺ results showed a significantly higher level of integrated HPV16 (P = 0.008) than did the ISH⁺ cases. As a consequence, lower copy numbers of episomal HPV16 in carcinoma might be the cause for the false-negative ISH results. Although the punctate signal pattern of HPV significantly increased with the severity of disease (P trend = 0.01), no significant difference in the HPV16 integration status was observed between the cases with a punctate signal only and the cases with mixed punctate and diffuse signals (P = 0.4). In conclusion, ISH using the Inform HPV III probe seems comparable to PCR for detecting HPV DNA in cervical tissue with CINs. False-negative ISH results appear to be associated with the lower copy numbers of the episomal HPV16 but not with the ability of the Inform HPV III probe to detect specific HPV types. In addition, signal patterns, especially a mixed punctate and diffuse pattern of HPV, cannot be reliably used to predict viral integration status.     

Langerhans cells and epithelial cell modifications in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: correlation with human papillomavirus infection

The study of a series of 18 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade II and III was aimed at determining the distribution and phenotype of immunocompetent cells (Langerhans cells, T and NK cells) and the alteration in the expression of EGF receptors and beta 2-microglobulin in correlation with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection (viral antigen and DNA typing with biotinylated probes). These lesions were characterized by a reduced number of Langerhans cells and a dense infiltrate. HPV infection did not induce HLA-DR expression in the infected epithelial cells. We observed an enhanced expression of epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptors by epithelial cells and a reduced beta 2-microglobulin reactivity by both epithelial and immunocompetent cells. Most of CIN showed foci of infected cells. No significant differences were observed in immunological markers of CIN harboring benign HPV 6/11 DNA or oncogenic HPV 16/18 DNA. Viral antigen was not detected in these lesions. These changes in the epithelial cells of CIN and their microenvironment associated to the lack of HLA-DR expression in the infected cells hamper the squamous epithelial cells to function as antigen presenting cells. This may facilitate a decrease in the immunological surveillance and may contribute to the severity of such lesions.     

Distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and invasive cervical cancer in Canada

Infection with high‐risk human papillomavirus (HPV) causes cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and invasive cervical cancer (ICC). The distribution of HPV types in cervical diseases has been previously described in small studies for Canadian women. The prevalence of 36 HPV genotypes in 873 women with CIN and 252 women with ICC was assessed on cervical exfoliated cells analyzed with the Linear Array (Roche Molecular System). HPV16 was the most common genotype in CIN and ICC. The seven most frequent genotypes in order of decreasing frequency were HPV16, 51, 52, 31, 39, 18, and 56 in women with CIN1, HPV16, 52, 31, 18, 51, 39, and 33 in women with CIN2, HPV16, 31, 18, 52, 39, 33, and 58 in women with CIN3, and HPV16, 18, 45, 33, 31, 39, and 53 in women with ICC. HPV18 was detected more frequently in adenocarcinoma than squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.013). Adjustment for multiple type infections resulted in a lower percentage attribution in CIN of HPV types other than 16 or 18. The proportion of samples containing at least one oncogenic type was greater in CIN2 (98.4%) or CIN3 (100%) than in CIN1 (80.1%; P < 0.001 for each comparison). Multiple type infections were demonstrated in 51 (20.2%) of 252 ICC in contrast to 146 (61.3%) of 238 women with CIN3 (P < 0.001). Adjusting for multiple HPV types, HPV16 accounted for 52.1% and HPV18 for 18.1% of ICCs, for a total of 70.2%. Current HPV vaccines should protect against HPV types responsible for 70% of ICCs in Canadian women. J. Med. Virol. 83:1034–1041, 2011. © 2011 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Methylation of p16INK4a is a non-rare event in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

The cell cycle inhibitor, p16INK4a may be a useful surrogate biomarker of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); however, there is currently no consensus of p16INK4a genetic alterations throughout the multiple step process of CIN. Our goal was to identify the methylation frequency of p16INK4a in each step of CIN that is associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, using several different detection methods of p16INK4a methylation to correlate the data. The present study included a total of 43 patients, including 38 with CIN, and 5 normal patients. Three different methods were used to detect hypermethylation of CpG islands, methylation-specific PCR (MSP) amplification of different primer sets of M1, M2, and M3, pyrosequencing of each forward primer region, and immunohistochemistry of p16INK4a. Analysis of MSP showed that 20 of the 38 CIN patients (52.6%) revealed hypermethylation in at least 1 primer set of the p16INK4a promoter. A complete loss of p16INK4a protein expression was observed in 11 cases (28.9%). There was no observed association of methylation of the p16INK4a gene with either CIN grading (P=0.0698) or HPV status (P=0.2811): specifically 42.9% (3/7) was found in CIN 1, 57.1% (8/14) in CIN 2, and 52.9% (9/17) in CIN 3. In concordance with immunohistochemistry results, hypermethylation of the p16INK4a promoter was significantly correlated with a lack of p16 protein expression (P=0.0145). All positive peaks from pyrosequencing matched the MSP results, which ranged from 6.3% to 24.5%. In conclusion, p16INK4a gene silencing during CIN was not determined to be a particularly rare event; however, it does not correlate with either HPV status or CIN grading.     

Current concepts in the relationship of human papillomavirus infection to the pathogenesis and classification of precancerous squamous lesions of the uterine cervix

Pathologic and epidemiologic studies performed over the past three decades have provided evidence that the development of squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix is a multistep process involving a precursor preinvasive stage. The results of recent molecular analyses now suggest that the human papillomavirus (HPV) plays a role in this process and is an important but insufficient factor in the development of invasive carcinoma. Infection by a variety of HPV types may result in active viral intranuclear replication without integration into the cellular genome. This episomal form of infection is manifested morphologically by the development of mild dysplasia, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 1 with koilocytosis and acanthosis. Approximately 20 different HPV types have been associated with CIN 1 lesions, whereas high-grade dysplasia and carcinoma in situ (CIN 2 and 3) are associated with only a few viral types (mainly HPVs 16, 31, 33, and 35). Low-grade lesions are differentiated and have a low risk of progression to cancer, whereas high-grade lesions are characterized by nearly complete or complete loss of squamous maturation and a higher risk of progression to invasive cancer. Based on the biologic dichotomy of an infectious and a neoplastic process and the segregation of HPV types into two groups, a modification of the CIN classification into low-grade and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions in accordance with the Bethesda System is proposed. Although HPV plays a significant role in the development of cervical neoplasia, the value of identifying HPV DNA by such molecular techniques as Southern blot analysis, in situ hybridization, and the polymerase chain reaction in the early detection of preinvasive lesions has not been determined and their routine use is not at present recommended.     

A comparison of the detection of biomarkers in infections due to low risk versus high-risk human papillomavirus types

Adjunctive immunohistochemistry tests for human papillomavirus (HPV) infection include p16 and Ki67 as well as the more recently discovered biomarkers importin-β, exportin-5, Mcl1, and PDL1. The purpose of this study was to compare the expression of these biomarkers in HPV infection due to the high-risk types such as HPVs 16, 18, 31, 33, 35, and 51 versus lesions that contain the low risk types HPV 2, 6 or 11. We studied 35 lesions with low risk HPV types (verruca vulgaris = 10 cases, condyloma acuminatum = 15 cases, CIN 1 with HPV 6/11 = 10 cases) and 25 CIN 1 or 2 lesions with a high-risk HPV type. The 25 high-risk positive CIN 1–2 cases had strong expression of the panel p16, Ki67, importin-β, exportin-5, Mcl1, and PDL1 where each protein localized to the cells in the parabasal aspect of the lesion. In comparison, neither p16, importin-β, exportin-5, Mcl1, nor PDL1 were increased in the epithelia of the lesions with the low risk HPV types; Ki67 showed variable expression. HPV viral capsid L1 protein and viral DNA were excellent markers of infection in the lesions with low risk types. Thus, p16, importin-β, exportin-5, Mcl1, and PDL1 are not only biomarkers of high-risk HPV infection but can also differentiate such lesions from those that contain low risk HPV types. Low risk HPV infections can be best differentiated from their mimics by viral L1 capsid detection and/or HPV DNA by in situ hybridization.