Dietary influences on survival after ovarian cancer

We evaluated the effects of various food groups and micronutrients in the diet on survival among women who originally participated in a population-based case-control study of ovarian cancer conducted across 3 Australian states between 1990 and 1993. This analysis included 609 women with invasive epithelial ovarian cancer, primarily because there was negligible mortality in women with borderline tumors. The women's usual diet was assessed using a validated food frequency questionnaire. Deaths in the cohort were identified using state-based cancer registries and the Australian National Death Index (NDI). Crude 5-year survival probabilities were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier technique, and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were obtained from Cox regression models. After adjusting for important confounding factors, a survival advantage was observed for those who reported higher intake of vegetables in general (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57-0.99, p-value trend 0.01 for the highest third, compared to the lowest third), and cruciferous vegetables in particular (HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.57-0.98, p-value trend 0.03), and among women in the upper third of intake of vitamin E (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.58-1.01, p-value trend 0.04). Inverse associations were also seen with protein (p-value trend 0.09), red meat (p-value trend 0.06) and white meat (p-value trend 0.07), and modest positive trends (maximum 30% excess) with lactose (p-value trend 0.04), calcium and dairy products. Although much remains to be learned about the influence of nutritional factors after a diagnosis of ovarian cancer, our study suggests the possibility that a diet high in vegetable intake may help improve survival.     

Obesity and survival among women with ovarian cancer: results from the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium

Background:

Observational studies have reported a modest association between obesity and risk of ovarian cancer; however, whether it is also associated with survival and whether this association varies for the different histologic subtypes are not clear. We undertook an international collaborative analysis to assess the association between body mass index (BMI), assessed shortly before diagnosis, progression-free survival (PFS), ovarian cancer-specific survival and overall survival (OS) among women with invasive ovarian cancer.

Methods:

We used original data from 21 studies, which included 12 390 women with ovarian carcinoma. We combined study-specific adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) using random-effects models to estimate pooled HRs (pHR). We further explored associations by histologic subtype.

Results:

Overall, 6715 (54%) deaths occurred during follow-up. A significant OS disadvantage was observed for women who were obese (BMI: 30–34.9, pHR: 1.10 (95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.99–1.23); BMI: ⩾35, pHR: 1.12 (95% CI: 1.01–1.25)). Results were similar for PFS and ovarian cancer-specific survival. In analyses stratified by histologic subtype, associations were strongest for women with low-grade serous (pHR: 1.12 per 5 kg m⁻²) and endometrioid subtypes (pHR: 1.08 per 5 kg m⁻²), and more modest for the high-grade serous (pHR: 1.04 per 5 kg m⁻²) subtype, but only the association with high-grade serous cancers was significant.

Conclusions:

Higher BMI is associated with adverse survival among the majority of women with ovarian cancer.     

Metformin intake is associated with better survival in ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND:

The objective of this case‐control study was to identify any association of metformin intake with the survival of patients with ovarian cancer.

METHODS:

In this retrospective case‐control study, women with ovarian cancer who received metformin (cases) were compared with women with ovarian cancer who did not receive metformin (controls). A 2‐layered analysis was conducted. In preliminary analysis, all cases (the OC cohort) were compared with controls at a 1:2 ratio. Subsequently, in definitive analysis, only patients who had epithelial ovarian cancer (the EOC cohort) were compared with controls at a 1:3 ratio. In the EOC cohort, cases were matched with controls for age (±5 years), International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage, and residual disease. Prognostic variables and disease specific survival were compared using chi‐square tests, the Kaplan‐Meier (log‐rank) method, and Cox proportional hazards analysis.

RESULTS:

In a preliminary analysis of the OC cohort (72 cases and 143 controls), cases had better survival (5‐year disease‐specific survival for cases vs controls, 73% vs 44%; P = .0002). In the definitive analysis of the EOC cohort (61 cases and 178 controls), the distribution of age, disease stage, optimal cytoreduction, serous histology, and platinum chemotherapy remained similar between cases and controls (P > .05). Despite these similarities, cases had significantly better survival (5‐year disease‐specific survival for cases vs controls, 67% vs 47%; P = .007). On multivariate analysis, metformin remained an independent predictor of survival (hazard ratio, 2.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2‐3.8; P = .007) after controlling for disease stage, grade, histology, chemotherapy, body mass index, and surgical cytoreduction.

CONCLUSIONS:

The results of this study indicated an association of metformin intake with survival in patients with ovarian cancer. The receipt of metformin was associated with better survival, and the authors concluded that metformin is worthy of clinical trials in ovarian cancer. Cancer 2013. © 2012 American Cancer Society.     

Predictors of ovarian cancer survival: a population-based prospective study in Sweden

Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of death from gynecologic malignancies among women worldwide. Little is known about reproductive factors or lifestyle determinants and ovarian cancer prognosis. The objective of this study was to examine whether ovarian cancer survival is influenced by reproductive history, anthropometric characteristics, prediagnostic life-style factors and family history of breast or ovarian cancer. The study population consisted of 635 epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) cases derived from a nationwide population-based case-control study conducted in Sweden between 1993 and 1995. Exposure data on prediagnostic factors of interest were collected through questionnaires at the beginning of the parent study. Clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Cases were followed-up by means of record linkage to nationwide registers until December 31, 2002. Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to estimate the prognostic effect of each factor in terms of hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), following adjustment for age at diagnosis, FIGO tumor stage and WHO grade of tumor differentiation. Tumor characteristics significantly influenced the risk of death from EOC. After adjustment for these, no clear associations were detected between reproductive history (parity, age at first or last birth, oral contraceptive use, age at menarche or menopause), anthropometric characteristics (body size and shape in different periods of life), lifestyle factors before diagnosis (alcohol consumption, smoking and physical activity over lifetime), nor family history of breast cancer or ovarian cancer and EOC survival. Our findings indicate that these prediagnostic factors do not influence the EOC survival. Nevertheless, among women with early stage disease (FIGO stage I and II), there was some indication that overweight in young adulthood or recent years increased the risk of death, while physical activity in young adult life appeared to reduce the risk of death due to EOC.     

Use of hormone replacement therapy before and after ovarian cancer diagnosis and ovarian cancer survival

Use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) has been hypothesized to affect survival of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We studied 5-year survival in patients with invasive EOC and borderline ovarian tumors (BOT) according to HRT use before and after diagnosis in a prospective nation-wide cohort study of 799 women diagnosed with EOC (n = 649) and BOT (n = 150) aged 50-74 years in 1993-1995 in Sweden. Cox regression was used to obtain multivariate age-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Multivariate models included indicator variables for age, tumor stage, grade and histological subtype. After 5 years of follow-up, 45% of the patients with EOC and 93% of the patients with BOT were alive. For women with BOT there were no associations between HRT-use pre- or postdiagnosis and survival. There was no overall difference in 5-year EOC survival according to use HRT before diagnosis (multivariate HR = 0.83, 95% CI = 0.65-1.08), except for serous EOC (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.48-0.98). Analyses of different HRT preparations, duration and recency of use did not reveal any variations in pattern of survival. We observed a better survival for EOC-patients who used HRT after diagnosis (multivariate HR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.42-0.78). We conclude that HRT-use prior to diagnosis of EOC does not affect 5-year survival, except for a possible survival advantage in serous EOC. Women using HRT after diagnosis had a better survival than women with no use, but we cannot rule out that this latter finding may reflect a subtle selection process.     

Individuality in FGF1 expression significantly influences platinum resistance and progression-free survival in ovarian cancer

Background:

Ovarian cancer is frequently advanced at presentation when treatment is rarely curative. Response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy significantly influences survival, but clinical response is unpredictable and is frequently limited by the development of drug-resistant disease.

Methods:

We used qRT–PCR analysis to assess intertumour differences in the expression of fibroblast growth factor 1 (FGF1) and additional candidate genes in human ovarian tumours (n=187), and correlated individuality in gene expression with tumour histology, chemotherapy response and survival. We used MTT assays to assess platinum chemosensitivity in drug-sensitive and drug-resistant ovarian cell lines.

Results:

Marked intertumour differences in gene expression were observed, with each tumour having a unique gene expression profile. Nine genes, including FGF1 (P=1.7 × 10⁻⁵) and FGFR2 (P=0.003), were differentially expressed in serous and nonserous tumours. MDM2 (P=0.032) and ERBB2 (P=0.064) expression was increased in platinum-sensitive patients, and FGF1 (adjusted log-rank test P=0.006), FGFR2 (P=0.04) and PDRFRB expression (P=0.037) significantly inversely influenced progression-free survival. Stable FGF1 gene knockdown in platinum-resistant A2780DPP cells re-sensitised cells to both cisplatin and carboplatin.

Conclusion:

We show for the first time that FGF1 is differentially expressed in high-grade serous ovarian tumours, and that individuality in FGF1 expression significantly influences progression-free survival and response to platinum-based chemotherapy.     

Cigarette smoking is associated with adverse survival among women with ovarian cancer: Results from a pooled analysis of 19 studies

Cigarette smoking is associated with an increased risk of developing mucinous ovarian tumors but whether it is associated with ovarian cancer survival overall or for the different histotypes is unestablished. Furthermore, it is unknown whether the association between cigarette smoking and survival differs according to strata of ovarian cancer stage at diagnosis. In a large pooled analysis, we evaluated the association between various measures of cigarette smoking and survival among women with epithelial ovarian cancer. We obtained data from 19 case‐control studies in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (OCAC), including 9,114 women diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Cox regression models were used to estimate adjusted study‐specific hazard ratios (HRs), which were combined into pooled hazard ratios (pHR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) under random effects models. Overall, 5,149 (57%) women died during a median follow‐up period of 7.0 years. Among women diagnosed with ovarian cancer, both current (pHR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.08–1.28) and former smokers (pHR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.02–1.18) had worse survival compared with never smoking women. In histotype‐stratified analyses, associations were observed for mucinous (current smoking: pHR = 1.91, 95% CI: 1.01–3.65) and serous histotypes (current smoking: pHR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.00–1.23; former smoking: pHR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.04–1.20). Further, our results suggested that current smoking has a greater impact on survival among women with localized than disseminated disease. The identification of cigarette smoking as a modifiable factor associated with survival has potential clinical importance as a focus area to improve ovarian cancer prognosis.     

The role of second-look laparotomy in the long-term survival in ovarian cancer

Background: To elucidate the role of second-look laparotomy in themanagement of ovarian cancer patients, we retrospectively reviewed ourexperience with this procedure in epithelial ovarian cancer patients.Patients and methods: The hospital records of 617 patients with advancedovarian cancer were reviewed. The 308 patients who underwent second-looklaparotomy were followed from four to 18 years with a median follow-up of 12years after start of primary chemotherapy.Results: Patients who achieved pathological complete response (PCR),microscopic partial response (PPR mic.), macroscopic partial response (PPRmac.), stable disease (PSD), and progressive disease (PPD) at second-looklaparotomy had a median survival time of 149, 39.5, 24, 14, and eight months,respectively. Secondary surgical cytoreduction could be performed only in 101patients with macroscopic persistent disease. The group of all patients withsecondary tumor debulking had no survival advantage compared with the groupof patients with PPR mac., PSD, and PPD, unable to have secondarycytoreduction. Patients left with no tumor after second-look laparotomy didnot survive as long as patients who achieved PCR and PPR mic. at second-looklaparotomy. Factors prolonging survival after second-look laparotomy includedyounger age, good pre-treatment performance status, smaller primary residualtumor size, longer interval between start of chemotherapy and second-looklaparotomy, and the pathologically proven CR or PR mic.Conclusion: Second-look laparotomy appears to have a minor role in theroutine management of ovarian cancer patients, especially in the context ofthe limited effectiveness of second-line therapy. This procedure should belimited to clinical treatment protocols to determine effectiveness of newagents.     

Intermediate clinical endpoints: A bridge between progression‐free survival and overall survival in ovarian cancer trials

Ovarian cancer patients are usually diagnosed at an advanced stage, experience recurrence after platinum‐based chemotherapy, and eventually develop resistance to chemotherapy. Overall survival (OS), which has improved in recent years as more active treatments have been incorporated into patient care, is regarded as the most clinically relevant endpoint in ovarian cancer trials. However, although there remains a significant need for new treatments that prolong OS further without compromising quality of life, it has become increasingly difficult to detect an OS benefit for investigational treatments because of the use of multiple lines of chemotherapy to treat ovarian cancer. Progression‐free survival (PFS), which measures the time to disease progression or death, is unaffected by postprogression therapies but does not evaluate the long‐term impact of investigational treatments on tumor biology and responses to future therapies. Recent clinical trials of targeted agents in relapsed ovarian cancer have shown improvements in PFS but not OS, and this is possibly reflective of the long postprogression survival (PPS) period associated with this disease. Intermediate endpoints such as the time to second disease progression or death and the time to second subsequent therapy or death may provide supportive evidence for clinically meaningful PFS improvements and may be used to determine whether these improvements persist beyond the first disease progression and throughout subsequent lines of therapy. For clinical trials that have settings with a long PPS duration and/or involve multiple rounds of postprogression therapy, a primary endpoint of PFS supported by intermediate clinical endpoints and OS may provide a more comprehensive approach for evaluating efficacy. Cancer 2015;121:1737–1746. © 2015 American Cancer Society.     

Characterization of ovarian cancer survival by histotype and stage: A nationwide study in Norway

Contemporary population-based data on ovarian cancer survival using current subtype classifications and by surgical status are sparse. We evaluated 1-, 3-, 5- and 7-year relative (and overall) survival, and excess hazards in patients with borderline tumors or invasive epithelial ovarian cancer diagnosed 2012 to 2021 in a nationwide registry-based cohort in Norway. Outcomes were evaluated by histotype, FIGO stage, cytoreduction surgery and residual disease. Overall survival was evaluated for non-epithelial ovarian cancer. Survival of women with borderline ovarian tumors was excellent (≥98.0% 7-year relative survival). Across all evaluated invasive epithelial ovarian cancer histotypes, 7-year relative survival for cases diagnosed with stages I or II disease was ≥78.3% (stage II high-grade serous). Survival for ovarian cancers diagnosed at stage ≥III differed substantially by histotype and time since diagnosis (eg, stage III, 5-year relative survival from 27.7% [carcinosarcomas] to 76.2% [endometrioid]). Overall survival for non-epithelial cases was good (91.8% 5-year overall survival). Women diagnosed with stage III or IV invasive epithelial ovarian cancer and with residual disease following cytoreduction surgery had substantially better survival than women not operated. These findings were robust to restriction to women with high reported functional status scores. Patterns for overall survival were similar to those for relative survival. We observed relatively good survival with early stage at diagnosis even for the high grade serous histotype. Survival for patients diagnosed at stage ≥III invasive epithelial ovarian cancer was poor for all but endometrioid disease. There remains an urgent need for strategies for risk reduction and earlier detection, together with effective targeted treatments.     

Induction of IgG antibodies to MUC1 and survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

We investigated whether epithelial ovarian cancer patients participating in a randomized phase III trial comparing single intraperitoneal (IP) administration of yttrium-90-labeled murine HMFG1 ((90)Y-muHMFG1) plus standard treatment (AT) vs. standard treatment (ST) alone developed IgG ab to MUC1 that had an impact on disease outcome. Serial serum samples from 208 patients in the AT and 199 patients in the ST arm were tested for IgG ab to MUC1 (anti-MUC1 IgG). Anti-MUC1 IgG at weeks 4, 8 and 12 ranked higher in the AT than in the ST arm (p < 0.001). The median (range) area under the curve (AUC) of anti-MUC1 IgG for weeks 1 to 12 was 5.53 (1.51-39.51) and 3.92 (1.17-68.74) for the AT and ST arm, respectively (p < 0.001). An anti-MUC1 IgG AUC > 13 was associated with a benefit in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in the AT arm in univariate (p = 0.043 and 0.036, respectively), but not in multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazards regression model). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a benefit in OS and DFS in patients with an anti-MUC1 IgG AUC > 13 in the AT arm (p = 0.043 and 0.036, respectively), but not in the ST arm. A single IP injection with muHMFG1 did not lead to a survival benefit in the randomized trial, but it induced ab to MUC1 that were associated with an improved disease outcome in patients with highest levels of anti-MUC1 IgG. Immunotherapy against MUC1 could be effective in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer.     

Green tea consumption enhances survival of epithelial ovarian cancer

Our study investigates whether tea consumption can enhance the survival of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer, a prospective cohort study was conducted in Hangzhou, China. The cohort comprised 254 patients recruited during 1999-2000 with histopathologically confirmed epithelial ovarian cancer and was followed up for a minimum of 3 years. Two hundred forty four (96.1%) of the cohort or their close relatives were traced. The variables examined included their survival time and the frequency and quantity of tea consumed post-diagnosis. The actual number of deaths was obtained and Cox proportional hazards models were used to obtain hazard ratios and associated 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusting for age at diagnosis, locality, BMI, parity, FIGO stage, histologic grade of differentiation, cytology of ascites, residual tumour and chemotherapeutic status. The survival experience was different between tea drinkers and non-drinkers (p < 0.001). There were 81 (77.9%) of 104 tea-drinkers who survived to the time of interview, compared to only 67 women (47.9%) still alive among the 140 non-drinkers. Compared to non-drinkers, the adjusted hazard ratios were 0.55 (95% CI = 0.34-0.90) for tea-drinkers, 0.43 (95% CI = 0.20-0.92) for consuming at least 1 cup of green tea/day, 0.44 (95% CI = 0.22-0.90) for brewing 1 batch or more of green tea/day, 0.40 (95% CI = 0.18-0.90) for consuming more than 500 g of dried tea leaves/year, and 0.38 (95% CI = 0.15-0.97) for consuming at least 2 g of dried tea leaves/batch. The corresponding dose-response relationships were significant (p < 0.05). We conclude that increasing the consumption of green tea post-diagnosis may enhance epithelial ovarian cancer survival.