Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with a transient response to fluid resuscitation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury in whom there is a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human subject committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Angiography was performed in patients with contrast material extravasation and/or splenic injury of grade III or higher (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria) at computed tomography (CT). TAE was performed when angiograms showed disruption of terminal splenic branches or arterial extravasation. Among 104 patients with splenic injury, the 15 patients (10 male, five female; mean age, 36.2 years) with a transient response to fluid resuscitation were the subjects of this study. A post hoc analysis was performed for CT grades, angiographic findings, associated injuries, and hemodynamic status in the subjects. RESULTS: Among 15 patients with a transient response, two had grade III, 11 had grade IV, and two had grade V injuries at CT. Six patients had associated injuries that required TAE. TAE of the spleen and associated injuries was successfully performed in all patients. The mean systolic blood pressure and shock index at the start of TAE were 84.2 mm Hg +/- 9.2 (standard deviation) and 1.46 +/- 0.30, respectively, and those at the completion of TAE were 132.1 mm Hg +/- 18.7 and 0.77 +/- 0.21, respectively (P < .001). The fluid infusion rate within 24 hours after the completion of TAE (132.1 mL/h +/- 71.1) was lower than that from the completion of the initial fluid resuscitation until the completion of TAE (1230.6 mL/h +/- 264.8) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TAE for blunt splenic injury can be performed successfully even in hemodynamically unstable patients with a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation.     

Transcatheter arterial embolization in a hemodynamically unstable patient with grade IV blunt liver injury: is nonsurgical management an option?

The prevalence of liver injury in patients who have sustained blunt multiple trauma was reported to range from 1 to 8%. Because previous mortality rates were as high as 50–80% for severe hepatic injury, the choice of treatment was under intensive investigation. Whereas nonsurgical management was the standard treatment for the hemodynamically stable patient, there is no consensus on how to treat hemodynamically unstable patients. This report details the case of a patient who sustained blunt multiple trauma, resulting in a grade IV liver injury, graded according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) Liver Injury Scale. With massive fluid and blood resuscitation, the patient was stable enough to be managed nonsurgically. With transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE), the left and right hepatic arteries were embolized with coils, which allowed for a good recovery. We hypothesize that TAE can be used in the hemodynamically unstable patient who responds to rapid fluid resuscitation and blood transfusion. We caution that there is insufficient evidence until now and would therefore not make any recommendations; however, we would question the need for surgery in unstable patients with this kind of injury in the future.     

Penetrating trauma to the abdominal aorta: CT demonstration of active bleeding

Contrast-enhanced helical computed tomography (CT) is the imaging study of choice for evaluating the abdomen in hemodynamically stable patients following blunt trauma. Surviving victims of penetrating trauma, in contrast, are often hemodynamically unstable and may require urgent celiotomy with or without diagnostic peritoneal lavage (DPL) or ultrasonography. Abdominal CT is not routinely performed in this patient population, but may be done if the patient with penetrating abdominal trauma is stable on admission or becomes so with resuscitation. CT in this context can address questions regarding the location and extent of injury and help decide appropriate management. We present a case of a stabilized blunt and penetrating trauma patient with negative DPL and active retroperitoneal aortic extravasation demonstrated by CT. To our knowledge, penetrating injury to the aorta with active bleeding has not been previously seen on CT.     

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy

PURPOSE: To determine if contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) can be used to select patients with blunt splenic injuries to undergo arteriographic embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery underwent contrast-enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography. CT scans were assessed for splenic vascular contrast material extravasation or posttraumatic splenic vascular lesions. Medical records were reviewed for splenic arteriographic results and clinical outcome. RESULTS: There were 25 grade I, 12 grade II, 27 grade III, 12 grade IV, and two grade V splenic injuries. CT showed active contrast material extravasation in seven patients and splenic vascular lesions in 19 patients. At CT, splenic vascular contrast material extravasation was 100% (seven of seven patients) and a posttraumatic splenic vascular lesion was 83% (10 of 12 patients) sensitive on the basis of arteriographic or surgical outcome in predicting the need for transcatheter embolization or splenic surgery. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 84% (48 of 57 patients), negative and positive predictive values of 92% (48 of 52 patients) and 65% (17 of 26 patients), respectively, and an accuracy of 83% (65 of 78 patients) in predicting the need for splenic injury treatment. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular injury who may be treated with transcatheter therapy and potentially improves the success rate of nonsurgical management.     

Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate delayed-phase computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of active splenic hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment from contained vascular injuries (pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas) that can be treated electively or managed conservatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study; the informed consent requirement was waived. Forty-seven patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed at CT after blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated. Abdominal and pelvic dual-phase CT was performed; images were obtained 60-70 seconds and 5 minutes after contrast material injection. Scans were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale. Patients with intrasplenic hyperattenuating foci on portal venous phase images were classified as having active splenic hemorrhage (group 1) or a contained vascular injury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings. Findings suggestive of active hemorrhage included areas that remained hyperattenuating or increased in size on delayed-phase images. The clinical outcome of these patients was determined by reviewing their medical records. Relationships between several factors were tested with the Fisher exact test, including (a) the presence or absence of hyperattenuating foci and management and (b) the presence of contained vascular injury or active extravasation and management. RESULTS: Portal venous phase CT revealed a focal high-attenuation parenchymal contrast material collection in 19 patients: nine patients were classified as group 1 and 10 were classified as group 2. All patients in group 1 underwent emergent splenectomy, and all patients in group 2 were initially treated without surgery. Significant differences in management were noted on the basis of whether hyperattenuating foci were seen on portal venous phase images (P < .001) and whether hyperattenuating foci seen at portal venous phase imaging were further characterized as active splenic hemorrhage or a contained vascular injury at delayed-phase CT (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In blunt splenic injury, delayed-phase CT helps differentiate patients with active splenic hemorrhage from those with contained vascular injuries.     

Traumatic mesenteric bleeding managed solely with transcatheter embolization

We report a rare case of mesenteric bleeding following blunt abdominal trauma successfully treated solely with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) of the right colic marginal artery. A 56-year-old woman presented with mesenteric bleeding after being involved in a car accident. Computed tomography (CT) showed a large mesenteric hematoma and hemoperitoneum with no associated major injuries to other organs. There was a pseudoaneurysm with extravasation inside the hematoma. TAE was attempted to control bleeding during the preparation for surgical laparotomy. A superior mesenteric angiogram revealed a right colic marginal artery pseudoaneurysm. After successful TAE with microcoils, the affected colon perfusion was preserved via collateral circulation from the ileocolic artery. No ischemic gastrointestinal complications have occurred, and laparotomy has not been necessary during the 6 months after TAE. In isolated mesenteric injury cases, TAE may be a reasonable alternative to emergency laparotomy.     

Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence and organ distribution of arterial extravasation identified using contrast-enhanced helical CT in patients who had sustained abdominal visceral injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-five consecutive patients from four level I trauma centers who had CT scans showing abdominal visceral injuries or pelvic fractures were included in this series. The presence or absence of arterial extravasation, as well as the anatomic sites of arterial extravasation, was noted. We obtained clinical follow-up data, including surgical or angiographic findings. RESULTS: In our series, 104 (18.4%) of 565 patients had arterial extravasation. Of the 104 patients, 81 (77.9%) underwent surgery, embolization, or both. The combined rate of surgery or embolization in patients with arterial extravasation was statistically higher than expected at all four institutions (p <0.001). The spleen was the most common organ injured, occurring in 277 (49.0%) of 565 patients, and arterial extravasation occurred in 49 (17.7%) of 277 patients with splenic injury. Several other visceral injuries were associated with arterial extravasation, including hepatic, renal, adrenal, and mesenteric injuries. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited reports of arterial extravasation in the nonhelical CT literature, the percentage (18%) of clinically stable patients in our study with CT scans showing arterial extravasation was higher than anticipated. This finding likely reflects the improved diagnostic capability of helical CT. Although the spleen and liver were the organs most commonly associated with arterial extravasation, radiologists should be aware that arterial extravasation may be associated with several other visceral injuries.     

Traumatic injuries: role of imaging in the management of the polytrauma victim (conservative expectation)

Abdominal US and CT play an important role in the initial management of blunt trauma in adults. Ultrasound is an excellent method for detection of free intra-abdominal fluid. It is the modality of choice for initial screening and enables selection of hemodynamically unstable trauma victims with severe hemoperitoneum for immediate surgery. However, even in experienced hands, US is not sufficient to rule out organ injuries reliably. Computed tomography, and particularly multislice CT (MSCT), has several major advantages over US and is currently unsurpassed for the detection of blunt visceral injuries in the abdomen. Computed tomography has a high sensitivity for the detection of parenchymal splenic and hepatic injuries. Injuries of the gastrointestinal tract may be detected with good sensitivity provided that adequate examination technique and careful diagnostic interpretation are combined. The value of CT-based injury-grading systems for predicting the outcome of conservative treatment remains unproven; however, demonstration of direct vascular injuries with CT, e.g., the intrasplenic "contrast blush" sign, may indicate a high likelihood that conservative treatment will fail, thus warranting angiographic embolization or surgery. Monitoring of conservatively treated trauma victims by means of repeat CT studies enables early detection of a variety of delayed, clinically silent complications of trauma, e.g., posttraumatic biloma or bowel devascularization. Catheter angiography may be reserved to selected cases with vascular injuries proven on CT.     

Transcatheter arterial embolization is effective for mesenteric arterial hemorrhage in trauma

A 58-year-old man was injured in a traffic accident and hemodynamically unstable on admission. An abdominal computed tomography (CT) with contrast enhancement was performed after fluid resuscitation. Fluid accumulated along the mesentery around the cecum. A pseudoaneurysm was found by angiography in the ileal branch. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was performed in the branch using microcoils. His hemodynamics stabilized after TAE. In a CT performed after 12 h, free air was suspected and an exploratory laparotomy was performed. No intestinal perforations were found and hemostasis was completed in the injured mesentery. No ischemic findings were obtained in the intestines. TAE is one of the treatments of choice for mesenteric hemorrhage.     

Active extravasation of arterial contrast agent on post-traumatic abdominal computed tomography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of emergent dynamic intravenous contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of active arterial extravasation in patients admitted to hospital after blunt abdominal trauma. METHODS: Four-hundred and ninety-eight consecutive emergent contrast-enhanced computed tomographic images of the abdomen and pelvis were retrospectively reviewed. The presence of and site(s) of active arterial extravasation were recorded. Two radiologists reviewed the images and compared the site(s) of extravasated arterial contrast agent with the site(s) of active hemorrhage established at angiography (n = 9) or surgery (n = 4). RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients' computed tomographic images were identified as showing signs of extravasation of contrast agent representing active arterial bleeding. A total of 49 sources of active arterial extravasation were identified, 37 in 19 patients. A pelvic source of active arterial hemorrhage was most frequent and was typically associated with unstable pelvic fractures (n = 18). Other sources of active arterial hemorrhage included the liver (n = 3), spleen (n = 2), retroperitoneum (n = 1), kidney (n = 1), mesentery (n = 1), abdominal wall (n = 3) and lumbar region (n = 1). Only 9 of 28 patients became sufficiently hemodynamically unstable to warrant angiography. All 9 patients had a pelvic source of arterial extravasation on contrast-enhanced CT, and 7 demonstrated active bleeding requiring embolization. The contrast-enhanced computed tomographic images correctly indicated the anatomical source of bleeding in all 7 cases. CONCLUSION: In patients who have experienced blunt abdominal trauma, attention should be paid to the computed tomographic features of active arterial hemorrhage. In our series, the pelvis was the most common source of active arterial bleeding, which was typically associated with unstable pelvic fractures.     

Blunt abdominal trauma: does the use of a second-generation sonographic contrast agent help to detect solid organ injuries?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to prospectively evaluate whether a second-generation sonography contrast agent (SonoVue) can improve the conspicuity of solid organ injuries (liver; spleen; or kidney, including adrenal glands) in patients with blunt abdominal trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Two hundred ten consecutive hemodynamically stable trauma patients underwent both abdominal sonography and CT at admission. The presence of solid organ injuries and the quality of sonography examinations were recorded. Patients with false-negative sonography findings for solid organ injuries in comparison with CT results underwent control sonography. If a solid organ injury was still undetectable, contrast-enhanced sonography was performed. Findings of admission, control, and contrast-enhanced sonograms were compared with CT results for their ability to depict solid organ injuries. Contrast-enhanced sonography was also performed in patients in whom a vascular injury (pseudoaneurysm) was shown on admission or control CT. RESULTS: CT findings were positive for 88 solid organ injuries in 71 (34%) of the 210 patients. Admission, control, and contrast-enhanced sonograms had a detection rate for solid organ injury of 40% (35/88), 57% (50/88), and 80% (70/88), respectively. The improvement in the detection rate between control and contrast-enhanced sonography was statistically significant (p = 0.001). After exclusion of low-quality examinations, contrast-enhanced sonography still missed 18% of solid organ injuries. Five vascular liver (n = 1) and spleen (n = 4) injuries (pseudoaneurysms) were detected on CT; all were visible on contrast-enhanced sonography. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced sonography misses a large percentage of solid organ injuries and cannot be recommended to replace CT in the triage of hemodynamically stable trauma patients. However, contrast-enhanced sonography could play a role in the detection of pseudoaneurysms.     

A Case of Traumatic Mesenteric Bleeding Controlled by only Transcatheter Arterial Embolization

We report a case of mesenteric hematoma following blunt abdominal trauma that was successfully treated with transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) and did not require surgical repair. A 43-year-old man with blunt abdominal trauma caused in a factory accident was admitted with a stable general condition and laboratory data. On CT examination, a large mesenteric hematoma with extravasation of contrast media was observed. TAE was first attempted to control the bleeding. A superior mesenteric angiogram showed extravasation of contrast medium from a branch of the ileocolic artery and obstruction of the cecal branch. After successful TAE using microcoils, the distal portion of the cecal branch was still preserved via collateral circulation. No abdominal symptoms have occurred during the 7 months following TAE. In mesenteric injury cases with limited intestinal damage, TAE may therefore be a reasonable alternative to emergent laparotomy.     

Usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization for intercostal arterial bleeding in a patient with burst fractures of the thoracic vertebrae

A 25-year-old man was injured in a motorcycle accident and hemodynamically unstable on admission. Right hemothorax and fractures of the ninth, tenth, and 11th thoracic vertebrae were confirmed in chest X-ray. Tube thoracostomy in the right chest was performed and about 400 mL of blood was drained. Contrast-enhanced CT showed a large hematoma around the vertebrae fractures and contrast extravasation from the intercostal arteries. As hemodynamics of the patient was very unstable, angiography was immediately performed with massive fluid resuscitation. Angiography showed contrast extravasation from the bilateral ninth, tenth, and 11th intercostal arteries. Transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) was performed using Gelfoam particles. The contrast extravasation had disappeared in all arteries. The hemodynamics of the patient gradually stabilized after TAE. On hospital day 44, he was transferred to a hospital near his home for an operation on the thoracic vertebrae and rehabilitation. When the reliability, rapidity, and low invasiveness of TAE for arterial bleeding are taken into consideration, we believed that this patient’s life could be saved by TAE.     

Changes in splenic size after abdominal trauma

After blunt abdominal trauma, the spleen often increases in volume on serial computed tomographic (CT) scans. To determine the frequency and significance of such enlargement, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of 44 hemodynamically stable patients who had experienced recent blunt abdominal trauma. The severity of splenic, hepatic, or other visceral injuries seen on each CT scan was numerically scored, and the amount of intraperitoneal fluid was assessed. Twenty-five patients (57%) had over 10% enlargement (average enlargement, 56%) on follow-up scans. Increasing volume did not correlate with clinical deterioration or the need for splenectomy. It did correlate modestly with the amount of blood in the peritoneum on CT scans, the number of units of blood transfused, and two clinical indexes of systemic trauma. Therefore, an enlarging spleen is not a CT indicator of a deteriorating clinical condition. This phenomenon is most likely due to marked adrenergic stimulation after injury and changing fluid volumes.     

Utility of routine trauma CT in the detection of bladder rupture

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency with which routine computed tomography (CT) fails to depict bladder rupture, the potential utility of delayed CT scans, and whether these findings might be useful in determining which patients may require subsequent cystography. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cystograms and abdominal and pelvic CT scans of 54 patients with blunt trauma and in whom bladder rupture was clinically suspected were retrospectively reviewed. Blind readings of CT scans were performed by two genitourinary radiologists. Cystograms were used as the standard. RESULTS: Cystograms depicted bladder rupture in 10 patients. On CT scans, extravesical fluid was depicted in all three patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture (although only a small amount of pelvic intraperitoneal fluid was present in two of these patients), in all seven patients with extraperitoneal bladder rupture, and in 32 of the 44 patients without bladder injury. Contrast material had been excreted into the bladder at the time of the initial or delayed CT in eight patients with bladder rupture; however, extravasation was identified in only four of the eight. In two of the four patients without extravasation, the bladder was distended at the time of CT. No bladder injuries were found in the 12 patients in whom pelvic fluid was not identified on CT scans. CONCLUSION: The absence of pelvic fluid on a trauma CT scan indicates that bladder rupture is unlikely. Even when a partially opacified bladder is passively distended, bladder injury may be present despite the absence of contrast material extravasation.     

CT of hemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma

This article is an appraisal of the use of CT in the management of patients with unstable abdominal trauma. We examined 41 patients with abdominal trauma using noncontrast dynamic CT. In 17 patients a postcontrast dynamic CT was also carried out. On CT, 25 patients had hemoperitoneum. Thirteen patients had splenic, 12 hepatic, 6 pancreatic, 8 bowel and mesenteric, 12 renal and 2 vascular injuries. Seven patients had retroperitoneal and 2 patients adrenal hematomas. All but five lesions (three renal, one pancreatic, and one splenic) were hypodense when CT was performed earlier than 8 h following the injury. Postcontrast studies (n = 17), revealed 4 splenic, 3 hepatic, 1 pancreatic, 3 renal, and 2 bowel and mesenteric injuries beyond what was found on noncontrast CT. Surgical confirmation (n = 21) was obtained in 81.81 % of splenic, 66.66 % of hepatic, 83.33 % of pancreatic, 100 % of renal, 100 % of retroperitoneal, and 85.71 % of bowel and mesenteric injuries. The majority of false diagnoses was obtained with noncontrast studies. Computed tomography is a remarkable method for evaluation and management of patients with hemodynamically unstable abdominal trauma, but only if it is revealed in the emergency room. Contrast injection, when it could be done, revealed lesions that were not suspected on initial plain scans. Received: 13 March 1997; Revision received: 1 December 1997; Accepted: 6 May 1998     

Blunt abdominal trauma: should US be used to detect both free fluid and organ injuries?

PURPOSE: To evaluate abdominal ultrasonography (US) for indirect (with free fluid analysis only) and direct (with free fluid and parenchymal analysis) detection of organ injury in patients with blunt abdominal trauma, with findings at computed tomography (CT) and/or surgery as the standard of diagnosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Abdominal US was performed at hospital admission in consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma. The presence of free peritoneal fluid and organ injury were recorded and compared with results of abdominal CT in all hemodynamically stable patients. When US results were considered false-negative for free fluid or organ injury compared with CT results, repeat US was performed within 6 hours. Admission and second US results were compared with CT and/or surgical results to determine sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of US with regard to the presence of free intraperitoneal fluid and/or organ injury. RESULTS: Two hundred five hemodynamically stable patients underwent abdominal US and CT. CT revealed free fluid in 83 patients and organ injury in 99. Thirty-one (31%) of 99 patients with organ injury did not have free fluid at CT. Three (10%) of the 31 patients required surgery or angiographic embolization. The sensitivity of admission US was 93% (77 of 83 cases) for the diagnosis of free fluid, 41% (39 of 99) for directly demonstrating organ injury, and 72% (71 of 99) for suggesting organ injury by means of both free fluid and organ analysis. At second US, these sensitivities were 96% (80 of 83 cases), 55% (54 of 99) and 84% (83 of 99), respectively. CONCLUSION: US is highly sensitive for the detection of free intraperitoneal fluid but not sensitive for the identification of organ injuries. In hemodynamically stable patients, the value of US is mainly limited by the large percentage of organ injuries that are not associated with free fluid.     

Clinical outcome of active extravasation in splenic trauma

The purpose of this study was to determine the necessity for splenectomy in patients with active extravasation on contrast enhanced CT secondary to splenic trauma. We reviewed cases of splenic injury and classified these according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) grading scale. The presence of active extravasation and associated injuries was assessed. Chart review was then performed to determine age, sex, mechanism of injury, indications for splenectomy, and clinical outcome. Of 82 cases evaluated, 12 grade I, 15 grade II, 30 grade III, 17 grade IV, and 8 grade V injuries were present. Eighteen patients were actively extravasating. Of extravasating patients, 13 eventually underwent open splenectomy or embolization and five (27.8%) were managed expectantly with success. Of grade IV injuries, 9/17 showed active extravasation, of which six underwent splenectomy. Of grade V injuries, 3/8 showed active extravasation, and all three underwent intervention. Splenectomy may not be necessary in appropriately chosen patients with active extravasation from the spleen in blunt abdominal trauma.     

Role of computerized tomography in the diagnosis of peritoneo-intestinal lesions resulting from closed trauma. Experience at 2 emergency departments

INTRODUCTION: Small and large bowel mesenteric injuries from blunt abdominal trauma are rare and often difficult to diagnose. Computed Tomography used in cases of blunt abdominal trauma has been found sensitive in detection of bowel and mesenteric injuries and discrimination of operable from nonoperable candidates. PURPOSE: A retrospective study of the CT examination of 24 patients, with surgically confirmed bowel and mesenteric injuries, was performed. Our goal was to evaluate the various CT signs of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury and the related frequency. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Our series includes 24 patients, 16 of them (first group) were investigated with CT at Cardarelli Hospital, Naples, while the remaining 8 (second group) at University of Bari. Patients of the first group, 11 men and 5 women, age ranging from 18 to 77 years, were submitted to a conventional abdominal CT performed after i.v. administration of contrast media. Patients of the second group, 7 men and 1 woman, age ranging from 4 to 81 years, were submitted to helical CT performed with the following parameters: 10 mm slice thickness, 5-mm contiguous intervals from the level of the diaphragm to the pubic bone, pitch 1.5. Helical CT was performed in all cases before and after i.v. administration of contrast material injected at a rate of 3.5 ml/sec. A scanning delay of 40 seconds after the beginning of contrast injection was routinely used. In all patients the following CT signs were retrospectively searched on: peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid, mesenteric hematoma, hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat, high-density clot (sentinel clot) adjacent to the involved bowel, pneumoperitoneum, retropneumoperitoneum, extravasation of intravenous contrast material, bowel wall thickening. RESULTS: In the first group the following CT signs were observed: mesenteric hematoma (87.5%), hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat (56.25%), peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid (37.5%), sentinel clot (25%), bowel wall thickening (18.75%), extravasation of intravenous contrast material (12.5%). In the second group the following CT signs were observed: peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid (87.5%), bowel wall thickening (50%), mesenteric hematoma (37.5%), sentinel clot (25%), pneumoperitoneum (12.5%), retropneumoperitoneum (12.5%), hazy streaky changes in mesenteric fat (12.5%). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Bowel and mesenteric injuries from blunt trauma are infrequent and difficult to diagnose clinically, as the physical and laboratory findings may be subtle and are often overshadowed by other injuries in patients with multisystem trauma. CT represents a proven modality in the evaluation of bowel and mesenteric injuries: careful inspection and technique are required to detect often subtle findings. In our series of 24 patients with surgically confirmed bowel and mesenteric injuries, the presence of mesenteric hematoma and of peritoneal or retroperitoneal fluid were the more frequent CT signs observed. Radiologists may play a crucial role in the timely diagnosis of these injuries, allowing prompt and appropriate management of these patients.     

Blunt splenic injuries: nonsurgical treatment with CT, arteriography, and transcatheter arterial embolization of the splenic artery

The management and outcome of blunt splenic injury diagnosed with computed tomography (CT) were studied in 44 consecutive patients who were hemodynamically stable or whose condition stabilized rapidly with resuscitation. Celiac and splenic arteriography was used in the triage of patients for nonsurgical treatment or for hemostasis. Patients without arterial extravasation of contrast material at arteriography were treated with bed rest only (group 1, n = 19); patients who had such extravasation were treated with bed rest after percutaneous transcatheter coil occlusion of the proximal splenic artery (group 2, n = 17). Abdominal exploration without angiography or embolotherapy was begun if the patient or attending surgeon did not agree with the treatment protocol (group 3, n = 8). Treatment with bed rest alone was successful in 18 patients. Clinical control of hemorrhage was accomplished in all patients in group 2 and one patient in group 1. Thus, exploratory laparotomy was avoided in 34 of 36 patients (94%) in whom nonoperative management was attempted; splenic salvage was achieved in 35 of 36 patients (97%).