乳腺癌调强放射治疗和常规切线野治疗的三维剂量学研究

背景与目的:乳房保留治疗已在早期乳腺癌患者中逐渐推广应用,其中全乳根治性放疗的标准技术通常采用常规切线野技术。调强放射治疗(intensity-modulatedradiotherapy,IMRT)技术有望在保障相同疗效的同时进一步减少放疗并发症,提高生活质量。本研究利用三维计划系统评价全乳IMRT的剂量学优势与适应证。方法:选择10例接受保乳手术的Tis～2N0M0早期乳腺癌病例,利用三维治疗计划系统为每例患者设计两种全乳放射治疗计划,切线野常规计划与IMRT计划,处方剂量均为5000cGy。用剂量体积直方图(dosevolumehistograms,DVH)来比较各种计划中计划靶体积(planningtargetvolume,PTV)、危及器官(organsatrisks,OARs)的剂量学差异。结果:靶区覆盖率在两种计划中相似,分别为98.3%和97.7%。与常规计划比较,IMRT计划的PTV接受<95%处方剂量与>103%处方剂量的体积百分比之和(inhomogeneityindex,IHI)从29.9%减少到2.9%,PTV接受至少105%处方剂量照射的体积百分比(V105%)从28.2%减少到0.6%;IMRT计划改善IHI和减少V105%的平均值在PTV较大的患者中优势更明显。左侧患者中冠状动脉的最大剂量(Dmax)以及心脏的平均剂量(Dmean)分别从5057.1cGy减少到4832.9cGy和从629.8cGy到450.7cGy;右侧患者肝脏的Dmean从283.9cGy减少到172.0cGy;所有患者中同侧肺的Dmean、至少接受20Gy照射的体积百分比(V20)分别从925.2cGy减少到765.9cGy,从16.0%到15.3%,Dmean与V20的平均值在IMRT计划中减少的百分比在不同射野中心肺厚度(centrallungdistance,CLD)亚组中分别是14.7%与20.9%,7.0%与12.9%;对侧乳腺和对侧肺的Dmean也分别从75.4cGy减少到20.3cGy和从30.9cGy到16.1cGy。结论:全乳IMRT的剂量学优势主要在于保证靶区覆盖率的前提下,显著改善靶区的剂量分布均匀性并一定程度上降低OARs的受照剂量与容积。乳房体积和CLD较大的病例可以通过IMRT技术获得更好的剂量学结果。     

乳腺癌保乳术后调强放疗与常规放疗的剂量学比较

 目的　探讨早期乳腺癌保乳术后全乳适形调强放射治疗（IMRT）的剂量学优势。方法　选择10例接受保乳手术的Tis~2N0M0早期乳腺癌病例,其中左侧乳腺癌6例,右侧乳腺癌4例,应用三维治疗计划系统（3D-TPS）为每位患者设计两种全乳放射治疗计划,即切线野常规计划与IMRT计划,处方剂量均为50 Gy／25次。用剂量体积直方图（DVH）来比较两种计划中计划靶体积（PTV）、危及器官（OARS）的剂量学差异。结果　靶区覆盖率在两种计划中相似,分别为97.83 %、97.61 %,与常规计划相比IMRT计划的PTV接受＜95 %处方剂量与＞103 %处方剂量的体积百分比之和（IHI） 从25.42 %减少到2.71 %,PTV接受至少105 %处方剂量照射的体积百分比（V105 %）从25.79 %减少到1.08 %,IMRT计划改善IHI和减少V105 %的平均值,在PTV较大的患者中更明显。左侧乳腺癌患者心脏的平均剂量（Dmean）从6.72 Gy减少到4.95 Gy、心脏接受30 Gy照射的体积百分比（V30）从7.23 %减少到1.04 %。所有患者同侧肺的Dmean从9.19 Gy减少到7.65 Gy、至少接受20 Gy 照射的体积百分比（V20）从22.34 %减少到20.18 %。对侧乳腺Dmean从5.12 Gy减少到3.52 Gy,对侧肺Dmean从2.76 Gy减少到1.79 Gy。右侧患者肝脏Dmean从7.23 Gy减少到1.04 Gy。结论　全乳IMRT的剂量学优势主要是在保证靶区覆盖率的前提下,显著改善了靶区剂量分布的均匀性,并在一定程度上降低OARS的受照剂量与容积,乳房体积大的病例可以通过IMRT获得更好的剂量学结果。     

A treatment planning study using non-coplanar static fields and coplanar arcs for whole breast radiotherapy of patients with concave geometry.

PURPOSE: A treatment planning study was performed to evaluate the performance of new radiotherapy techniques based on non-coplanar multiple fields or on dynamic conformal arcs for early stage breast treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS: CT datasets of 7 different patients that were deemed unsuitable for tangential beam treatment due to a large volume of lung in the treatment fields were used as input for the study. Standard tangential field plans and inversely modulated IMRT plans were used as benchmark to evaluate performances of conformal plans with 3 non-coplanar fields (3F-NC), with 2 short dynamic conformal arcs (2-Arc) or hybrid plans with one static conformal field and one dynamic conformal arc (P-Arc). All plans were designed to achieve the higher target coverage and minimum ipsilateral lung involvement depending on the planning technique with a key objective to avoid involvement of the contralateral breast. The following planning objectives were selected. For PTV: D(1%) (maximum significant dose) lower than 110% and D(99%) (minimum significant dose) higher than 90%. For the ipsilateral lung a mean dose lower than 15 Gy and/or a volume receiving more than 20 Gy lower than 22%. For contralateral breast, all techniques but IMRT were set to have no beam impinging this organ at risk, while for IMRT plans were further designed to keep the mean dose lower than 5 Gy and to minimise the volume receiving a dose higher than 70% of the prescribed dose. RESULTS: P-Arc resulted to be on average a better technique, as it provides a PTV dose distribution highly conformal (Conformity index 1.45), homogeneous (D(5%)-D(95%)=15.6%), with adequate coverage (V(90%)=96.4%) and a limited involvement of the ipsilateral lung (MLD approximately 9 Gy, V(5 Gy) approximately 36%, NTCP<2%) when compared to four other treatment techniques. 3F-NC presented similar but slightly worse performances on target: Conformity index 1.57, D(5%)-D(95%)=18.1%, V(90%)=95.7%). 3F-NC on ipsilateral lung resulted as the P-Arc. The tangential approach, the 2-Arc or the IMRT techniques, resulted to be inferior to the previous in either conformality (tangentials), ipsilateral lung sparing (tangentials, 2-Arc and IMRT) and in contralateral or healthy tissue involvement (IMRT). CONCLUSION: For early stage breast cancer when high sparing of lung tissues is required and no involvement of contralateral breast is allowed, the P-Arc or the 3F-NC techniques might be recommended in terms of dosimetric expectations.     

早期乳腺癌保乳术后全乳调强放射治疗与常规切线野放疗的剂量学比较

目的探讨早期乳腺癌保乳术后全乳调强放射治疗(intensity-modulated radiotherapy,IMRT)的剂量学优势。方法选择6例接受保乳手术的T1N0M0早期乳腺癌病例,其中左侧乳腺癌4例,右侧乳腺癌2例,应用三维调强治疗计划系统为每例患者设计常规切线野与IMRT2种全乳放射治疗计划,处方剂量均为50Gy/25次。用剂量体积直方图(dose volume histograms,DVH)来比较2种计划中计划靶体积(planning target volume,PTV)、危及器官(organs at risks,OARs)的剂量学差异。结果在2种计划中,95%PTV均接受50Gy,99%PTV均接受95%的处方剂量;但在IMRT计划组V110%(接受大于110%处方剂量体积占PTV的百分比)下降了9.1%(46.3%比37.2%,P<0.05);同侧肺的V20(至少接受20Gy照射的肺体积占同侧肺体积的百分比)下降了7.2%(26.8%比18.0%,P<0.05);同侧肺的V30下降了12.0%(23.2%比11.2%,P<0.05);4例左侧乳腺癌患者的心脏V30下降了3.8%(7.0%比3.2%,P<0.05)。结论全乳IMRT在保证靶区覆盖率的前提下,改善了靶区内剂量的均匀性,降低了危及器官的受照剂量及缩小了危及器官的照射体积,尤其是同侧肺、心脏的照射体积,降低放射性肺炎及心血管事件发生的可能。     

The impact of central lung distance,maximal heart distance,and radiation technique on the volumetric dose of the lung and heart for intact breast radiation

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact of radiographic parameter and radiation technique on the volumetric dose of lung and heart for intact breast radiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty patients with both two-dimensional (2D) and computed tomographic (CT) simulations were enrolled in the study. Central lung distance (CLD), maximal heart distance (MHD), and maximal heart length (MHL) were measured under virtual simulation. Four plans were compared for each patient. Plan A used a traditional 2D tangential setup. Plan B used clinical target volume (CTV) based three-dimensional (3D) planning. Both plans C and D used a combination of a medial breast field with shallow tangents. Plan D is a further modification of plan C. RESULTS: Under the traditional tangential setup, the mean ipsilateral lung dose and volume at 20, 30, and 40 Gy correlated linearly with CLD (R = 0.85 approximately 0.91). The mean ipsilateral lung dose (Gy) approximated 4 times the CLD value (cm), whereas the percentage volume (%) of ipsilateral lung at 20, 30, and 40 Gy was about 10 times the CLD (cm). The mean heart dose and percentage volume at 20, 30, and 40 Gy correlated with MHD (R = 0.76 approximately 0.80) and MHL (R = 0.65 approximately 0.75). The mean heart dose (Gy) approximated 3 times the MHD value (cm), and the percentage volume (%) of the heart at 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy was about 6 times MHD (cm). Radiation technique impacted lung and heart dose. The 3D tangential plan (plan B) failed to reduce the volumetric dose of lung and heart from that of the 2D plan (plan A). The medial breast techniques (plans C and D) significantly decreased the volume of lung and heart receiving high doses (30 and 40 Gy). Plan D further decreased the 20 Gy volumes. By use of the medial breast technique, the lung and heart dose were not impacted by original CLD and MHD/MHL. Therefore, the improvement from the tangential technique was more remarkable for patients with CLD >or= 3.0 cm (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CLD and MHD impact the volumetric dose of lung and heart. The application of 3D planning for tangential breast irradiation does not decrease heart and lung dose. Adding a medial breast port significantly decreases percentage volume (PV) of lung and heart receiving high doses, especially when the CLD is excessive.     

Comparision of Different Radiotherapy Planning Techniques for Breast Cancer after Breast Conserving Surgery

Objectives:To compare different radiotherapy planning techniques for breast cancer after breast conserving surgery.Materials and methods: Eighteen patients with breast cancer who underwent breast conserving surgery were selected.For each patient four different whole breast irradiation techniques including Tan, fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT werecompared to the conventional tangential technique (Tan). Results: Mean maximum point dose (Dmax) for Tan, fIMRT,iIMRT and VMAT were 110.17% (±1.87), 105.89% (±1.13), 106.47% (±0.92) and 106.99% (±1.16) (p<0.001). Meanminimum point dose (Dmin) from Tan was 84.02% (±3.68) which was significantly higher than those from fIMRT,iIMRT and VMAT which were 76.57% (±11.4), 67.69 %( ±19.20) and 80.69% (±7.06) (p<0.001). Only the meanV95 of fIMRT was significantly less than Tan (p=0.01). Mean percentage of volume receiving ≥ 20 Gy (V20Gy) andmean doses of the ipsilateral lung were 17.09% and 953.05 cGy, 16.60% and 879.20 cGy, 14.79% and 772.26 cGy,15.32% and 984.34 cGy for Tan, fIMRT, iIMRT and VMAT. Only iIMRT had a significantly lower mean V20Gy andthe mean dose to ipsilateral lung in comparison with Tan. Significantly, high mean doses to the contralateral breast(498.07 cGy, p<0.001) were observed in VMAT. Conclusion: The conventional tangential technique provides adequatedose coverage but resulted in high dose-volumes. The iIMRT and fIMRT had significantly smaller high dose-volumesand better conformity. VMAT demonstrated excellent dose homogeneity and conformity but an increased low-dosevolume outside the target should be of concern.     

Four-dimensional proton treatment planning for lung tumors

PURPOSE: In proton radiotherapy, respiration-induced variations in density lead to changes in radiologic path lengths and will possibly result in geometric misses. We compared different treatment planning strategies for lung tumors that compensate for respiratory motion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Particle-specific treatment planning margins were applied to standard helical computed tomography (CT) scans as well as to "representative" CT scans. Margins were incorporated beam specific laterally by aperture widening and longitudinally by compensator smearing. Furthermore, treatment plans using full time-resolved 4D-computed tomography data were generated. RESULTS: Four-dimensional treatment planning guaranteed target coverage throughout a respiratory cycle. Use of a standard helical CT data set resulted in underdosing the target volume to 36% of the prescribed dose. For CT data representing average target positions, coverage can be expected but not guaranteed. In comparison to this strategy, 4D planning decreased the mean lung dose by up to 16% and the lung volume receiving 20 Gy (prescribed target dose 72 Gy) by up to 15%. CONCLUSION: When the three planning strategies are compared, only 4D proton treatment planning guarantees delivery of the prescribed dose throughout a respiratory cycle. Furthermore, the 4D planning approach results in equal or reduced dose to critical structures; even the ipsilateral lung is spared.     

保乳术后腋窝淋巴结标准切线野与多野放疗的剂量学比较

目的 评价标准切线野对腋窝Ⅰ、Ⅱ站淋巴结覆盖情况,分析调强计划处方剂量给予腋窝淋巴结时正常组织剂量。方法 回顾分析15例左侧乳腺癌接受保乳手术、前哨淋巴结活检和全乳放疗。放疗计划以标准切线野为基础采用逆向调强方法优化。按照RTOG标准勾画Ⅰ、Ⅱ站腋窝淋巴结,以原始计划计算1组和2组腋窝淋巴结靶区覆盖程度。每个患者设计全乳腋窝IMRT计划,CTV包括全乳和Ⅰ、Ⅱ站腋窝淋巴结。处方剂量均为50 Gy分25次。计算靶区HI和CI及OAR的参数。结果 标准切线野计划中Ⅰ、Ⅱ站腋窝淋巴结D_mean分别为34.4、21.9 Gy。腋窝Ⅰ站V₅₀、V₄₀分别为22.6%、49.9%,Ⅱ站分别为6.0%、22.0%。全乳腋窝调强计划降低了全乳照射剂量均匀性,PTV适形性也较差,并明显增加了同侧肺和心脏剂量,同侧肺V₂₀由17.1%增至34.2%,D_mean由999 cGy增至1732 cGy。结论 标准切线野不能很好覆盖Ⅰ、Ⅱ站腋窝淋巴结。需要腋窝放疗者应行IMRT计划以保证腋窝接受足够剂量,但正常组织剂量明显增加。     

The influence of patient geometry on the selection of chest wall irradiation techniques in post-mastectomy breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate three chest wall (CW) irradiation techniques: wide tangential photon beams, direct appositional electron field and electron arc therapy with regards to target coverage and normal tissue tolerance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-two post-mastectomy breast cancer patients were planned using three CW irradiation techniques. Computed tomography (CT) simulation was done on all patients and clinical target, heart and lung volumes were contoured. For each technique, dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVH) were calculated. Pass/fail criteria were applied based on volumetric target and critical structure dose coverage. Passing criteria for target was 95% of target receiving 95% of dose using a standard dose of 50 Gy/25 fractions, for heart 相似文献   

Internal mammary node coverage: an investigation of presently accepted techniques

PURPOSE: Recent publications have generated a renewed interest in regional nodal treatment to include the ipsilateral supraclavicular and internal mammary nodes (IMN). The purpose of this study is to evaluate three presently accepted treatment techniques for coverage of the intact breast and ipsilateral lymph node regions and to construct recommendations regarding the utilization of these techniques. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Anatomic data were obtained from five randomly selected patients with computerized tomography (CT) in treatment position. Three patients presented with cancer of the left breast and two with cancer of the right. Using the Pinnacle 3-D planning system, normal tissue volumes of breast, ipsilateral lung, heart, sternum, and the IMN target were delineated for each patient. Three accepted techniques used to treat ipsilateral breast, internal mammary and supraclavicular nodes (extended tangents, 5-field, partly wide tangents) were configured and compared to a supraclavicular field matched to standard tangential fields. A dosage of 50 Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the target volume. Dose-volume histograms (DVH) were generated and analyzed with regard to target volume coverage and lung/heart volumes treated. RESULTS: All of the treatment techniques covering IMN include at least 10% more lung and heart volume than that covered by standard tangential fields. The relative lung and heart volumes treated with each technique were consistent from patient to patient. The 5-field technique clearly treats the largest volume of normal tissue; however, most of this volume receives less than 50% of the dose prescribed. The percent of heart and ipsilateral lung treated to 20 Gy, 30 Gy, and 40 Gy have been calculated and compared. Due to the increase in chest wall thickness and depth of IMN superiorly, complete coverage was not achieved with any technique if the IMN target extended superiorly into the medial supraclavicular field where dose fall-off resulted in a significant underdosing at depth. For the same anatomic reasons, the 5-field technique underdosed 10-15% of the IMN target volume in 4 of the 5 cases. This technique also yielded a greater dose heterogeneity, which was not seen with the other techniques evaluated and correlated with the change of anterior chest wall thickness. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic variation in chest wall thickness and IMN depth strongly suggests the routine use of multislice CT planning to ensure complete coverage of the target volume and optimal sparing of normal tissue. All of the techniques can be constructed to look acceptable at central axis. To cover the superior most aspect of the IMN chain either high tangential fields, a supraclavicular field photon beam of energy >6 MV, or an AP/PA supraclavicular setup should be considered. The 5-field technique has the most difficulty in compensating for the increased depth of the IMN in the superior aspect of the tangent fields with up to +/-40% variation of the dose noted in isolated areas within the target volume. Based on our evaluation, the partly wide tangent technique offers many advantages. It provides optimal coverage of the target volume, reduces coverage of normal tissue volumes to an acceptable level, and is easily reproducible with a high degree of dose homogeneity throughout the target.     

IMRT for breast. a planning study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of ten different treatment-planning systems when intensity modulated (IMRT) plans are designed for breast treatments that include the irradiation of the internal mammary chain. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A dataset of five patients (CT images and volumes of interest) was distributed to design IMRT plans on the ten systems. To minimise biases, the same geometry and clinical planning aims were imposed on the individual plans. Results were analysed in terms of dose distributions and dose volume histograms. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: For target coverage, the volume receiving more than 95% of the prescribed dose ranged from 77% (OTP) to 91% (Eclipse and Pinnacle), the volume receiving more than 107% ranged from 3.3% (Hyperion) to 23.2% (OTP). The mean dose to ipsilateral lung ranged from 13 Gy (Eclipse) to 18 Gy (OTP). The volume of the contralateral breast receiving more than 10 Gy ranged from 3% (Pinnacle) to 26% (Precise). The volume of heart receiving more than 20 Gy ranged from 7% (Eclipse) to 47% (Precise), the maximum significant dose to heart ranged from approximately 27 Gy (XiO) to approximately 49 Gy (Precise). The maximum significant dose to healthy tissue ranged from approximately 51 Gy (Eclipse) to approximately 62 Gy (OTP). It was also possible to show that the treatment geometry proposed here enables to minimise contralateral breast irradiation while keeping minimal ipsilateral lung (or heart) involvement and satisfactory target coverage.     

早期乳腺癌保乳术后4种放疗技术的剂量参数比较

目的：比较早期乳腺癌保乳术后常规切线野（TW）、野中野调强（FIF - IMRT）、切线逆向调强（T -IMRT）和容积调强（VMAT）4种放射治疗技术的靶区和危及器官的剂量参数。方法：15例左侧早期（pT1-2 N0 M0）乳腺癌患者保乳术后接受放疗。CT 模拟定位扫描后勾画靶区和危及器官,在同一患者 CT 影像上分别做 TW、FIF - IMRT、T - IMRT 和 VMAT 4种治疗计划设计。PTV 剂量为50Gy,V47.5≥95%。4种计划的剂量限制相同。在剂量-体积直方图中读取4种计划靶区剂量的分布参数,心脏、双侧肺脏及对侧乳腺受照剂量和体积,对各参数的均数进行比较,并比较4组平均机器跳数差异。结果：4种计划都满足 V47.5≥95%。VMAT 与 T - IMRT、FIF - IMRT 和 TW 计划相比,明显提高了靶区适行指数（CI,P ﹤0.05）。VMAT、T - IMRT和 FIF - IMRT 与 TW 相比,明显改善了靶区均匀性指数（HI,P ﹤0.05）。VMAT 增加了危及器官（心脏和同侧肺脏）V 5、V10和 V20的受照射体积,但是没有增加﹥ V30的照射体积。VMAT 明显增加了右侧乳腺和右侧肺脏照射剂量（P ﹤0.05）,T - IMRT 和 FIF - IMRT 明显降低了右侧乳腺和右侧肺脏照射剂量（P ﹤0.05）。VMAT 与T - IMRT、FIF - IMRT 和 TW 相比,明显增加了机器跳数（P ﹤0.05）。结论：早期乳腺癌保乳术后放射治疗4种计划比较,VMAT 明显提高了靶区的适行性和均匀性,增加了正常组织的受照射剂量和机器跳数,延长了治疗时间。T - IMRT 和 FIF - IMRT 也提高了靶区的适行性和均匀性,降低了正常组织的受照射剂量。     

Significant reductions in heart and lung doses using deep inspiration breath hold with active breathing control and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients treated with locoregional breast irradiation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the heart and lung sparing effects of moderate deep inspiration breath hold (mDIBH) achieved using an active breathing control (ABC) device, compared with free breathing (FB) during treatment with deep tangents fields (DT) for locoregional (LR) irradiation of breast cancer patients, including the internal mammary (IM) nodes (IMNs). To compare the DT-mDIBH technique to other standard techniques and to evaluate the dosimetric effect of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Fifteen patients (9 left-sided and 6 right-sided lesions) with Stages 0-III breast cancer underwent standard FB and ABC computed tomographic (CT) scans in the treatment position. A dosimetric planning study was performed. In FB, the 9 left-sided patients were planned with a 5-field technique where electron fields covering the IM region were matched to shallow tangents using wedges (South West Oncology Group [SWOG] protocol S9927 technique A). This method was compared with a 3-field DT technique covering the breast and the IMNs (SWOG S9927 technique B). Compensation with IMRT was then compared with wedges for each technique. For the 15 total patients, dosimetric planning using DT with IMRT was then reoptimized on the mDIBH CT data set for comparison. Dose-volume histograms for the clinical target volume (CTV) (including the IMNs), planning target volume (PTV), ipsilateral and contralateral breast, and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed. In addition, normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP) for lung and heart, mean lung doses, and the number of monitor units (MUs) for a 1.8 Gy fraction were compared. RESULTS: For the 9 left-sided patients, the mean percentage of heart receiving more than 30 Gy (heart V30) was lower with the 5-field wedged technique than with the DT wedged technique (6.8% and 19.1%, respectively, p < 0.004). For the DT technique, the replacement of wedges with IMRT slightly diminished the mean heart V30 to 16.3% (p < 0.51). The introduction of mDIBH to the DT-IMRT technique reduced the heart V30 by 81% to a mean of 3.1% (p < 0.0004). Compared with 5-field IMRT, DT-IMRT with mDIBH reduced the heart V30 for 6 of the 9 patients, entirely avoiding heart irradiation in 2 of these 6 patients. For DT-IMRT, mDIBH reduced the mean lung dose and NTCP to levels obtained with the 5-field IMRT technique. For the 15 patients planned with DT-IMRT in FB, the use of mDIBH reduced the mean percentage of both lungs receiving more than 20 Gy from 20.4% to 15.2% (p < 0.00007). With DT-IMRT, more than 5% of the contralateral breast received more than 10 Gy for 6 of the 9 left-sided patients in FB, 3 of those 9 patients in mDIBH, and only 1 of those 9 patients planned with 5 fields. The mean % of the PTV receiving more than 55 Gy (110% of the prescribed dose) was 36.4% for 5-field wedges, 33.4% for 5-field IMRT, 28.7% for DT-wedges, 12.5% for DT-IMRT, and 18.4% for DT-IMRT mDIBH. The CTV remained covered by the 95% isodose in all the DT plans but one (99.1% of the volume covered). DT-wedges required more MUs than DT-IMRT (mean of 645 and 416, respectively, p < 0.00004). CONCLUSION: mDIBH significantly reduces heart and lung doses when DT are used for LR breast irradiation including the IMNs. Compared with shallow tangents matched with electrons, DT with mDIBH reduces the heart dose (in most patients) and results in comparable lung toxicity parameters, but may increase the dose to the contralateral breast. IMRT improves dose homogeneity, slightly reduces the dose to the heart, and diminishes the number of MUs required.     

Evaluation of standard tangential irradiation versus breast ring technique using three-dimensional tools in cancerous large breasts

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: In patients with large breasts, tangential irradiation after lumpectomy is technically difficult. Tangential plans of large breasts comprise a large volume of the lung, axilla and heart, as well as an important volume of the opposite breast and lung. METHODS: Instead of classical positioning of the breast, we encircled the breast with a plastic polyvinyl ring-shaped tube. All five left-sided breast cancer patients underwent CT scan planning with and without the plastic ring in conventional treatment positioning. Skin treatment portals at the midline and mid axilla were marked with radio-opaque markers. The scan volume encompassed the region from just below the diaphragm to the lung apex. Patients' plans were evaluated with regard to dose-volume coverage of the breast planning target volume, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung, heart and contralateral breast. End points were maximum dose, minimum dose, and mean dose delivered to the target or critical structure. RESULTS: As expected, the average volume of the left lung treated above a tolerance dose of 2000 cGy was less than 10% in the ringed breast, whereas in the other method without the ring the corresponding lung volume was 30%. The cardiac volume receiving a dose over 4000 cGy was 2% in the ringed breast and 18% in the breast without a ring. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of a simple technique with a fairly low expenditure, acute skin reactions and late cardiac and lung morbidity can be minimized in patients with large breasts.     

左乳腺癌保乳术后全乳和锁骨上下及内乳淋巴结区三种放疗方式的剂量学研究

  目的  对左乳腺癌保乳术后全乳及锁骨上下、内乳淋巴结引流区三种放疗方式在靶区及危及器官（organs at risk，OARs）的剂量学进行研究。  方法  选取2018年1月至2019年10月20例于昆明医科大学第一附属医院行左乳腺癌保乳术后放疗患者的定位CT资料，设计固定野滑窗调强放疗（dynamic multi-leaf collimator，dMLC）、容积弧形调强放疗（volumetric intensity modulated arctherapy，VMAT）和螺旋断层放疗（tomotherapy，HT）三种计划，并对剂量指标进行统计学分析。  结果  HT在术后瘤床（plan targetvolume of tumor bed，PTV_tb）的平均剂量（mean dose，D_mean）、D₁、适形度（homogeneity index，HI）和全乳及淋巴引流区的计划靶区（plan target volume，PTV）的D_mean、均匀性（conformity index，CI）均优于dMLC和VMAT，并且降低心脏和患侧肺的D_mean、V₅、V₁₀、V₃₀。HT在冠状动脉左前降支和右冠状动脉的D_mean以及D₁比较中剂量最低，但相比VMAT及dMLC，HT增加健侧乳腺的D₁和D_mean。  结论  对左乳腺癌保乳术后患者，HT对降低心脏毒性和保护患侧肺最有优势，但对健侧肺低剂量控制不如VMAT和dMLC，dMLC对健侧肺及健侧乳腺低剂量控制最佳，但对心脏及患侧肺的高剂量控制最差。在临床中需根据实际情况选择合适的计划方式。      

乳腺癌改良根治术后内乳电子线大分割照射剂量学评估和急性不良反应、近期疗效

目的 探讨乳腺癌改良根治术后内乳电子线大分割照射剂量学特征及急性不良反应、近期疗效。方法 选择2018-2020年收治 155例乳腺癌改良根治术后患者,Ⅲ期 137例(88.4%),Ⅱ期 18例(11.6%)。所有患者均接受规范的化疗、内分泌治疗和抗Her2靶向治疗。按第1、2、3肋间将内乳临床靶体积(CTVim)分为3个亚区(CTVim1、CTVim2、CTVim3),同时勾画锁骨上下区形成计划靶体积(PTVsc)。胸壁CTV和CTVim采用 6~15MeV电子线照射43.5Gy分15次,3周完成。PTVsc采用6MV X线二维放疗或三维放疗43.5Gy分15次,3周完成。评估内乳、PTVsc及肺、心脏、左前降支(LAD)和右冠脉(RA)的剂量学特征,分析急性不良反应、近期疗效。结果 CTVim的 Dmean为(43.3±2.6)Gy,D95%为(30.5±8.3)Gy,V90%为(85.0±10.5)%,V80%为(91.0±7.4)%。CTVim1的相应参数值显著低于CTVim2和CTVim3(均 P<0.001)。体质指数对内乳剂量无影响(P>0.05)。三维放疗比二维放疗技术显著增加CTVim的 Dmean[(43.4±2.6)Gy∶(41.4±2.3)Gy,P=0.021]和PTVsc的热点体积[V110%:(26.7±17.5) cm³∶(12.5±8.4) cm³,P=0.018;V120%:(6.1±5.3) cm³∶(2.0±2.6) cm³,P=0.023]。患肺 Dmean为(9.8±1.9)Gy,V20Gy为(19.7±4.7)%。全组患者心脏 Dmean为(3.3±1.7)Gy,左乳腺癌为(4.7±1.4)Gy,右乳腺癌为(2.6±1.2)Gy。左乳腺癌患者LADDmean为(13.9±4.9)Gy,右乳腺癌患者RADmean为(7.5±3.7)Gy。≥2级急性放射性皮炎、放射性食管炎、放射性肺炎发生率分别为19.3%、4.5%、2.6%。中位随访20.5个月(9.9~41.8个月),2例胸壁复发,2例区域淋巴结复发,6例远处转移,死亡 1例。结论 乳腺癌改良根治术后内乳电子线大分割照射时肺、心、冠脉剂量较低,患者急性不良反应轻且发生率低。但第1肋间的内乳剂量偏低,虽然近期随访疗效较好但需要长期随访。     

An improved technique for breast cancer irradiation including the locoregional lymph nodes

Purpose: To find an irradiation technique for locoregional irradiation of breast cancer patients which, compared with a standard technique, improves the dose distribution to the internal mammary–medial supraclavicular (IM-MS) lymph nodes. The improved technique is intended to minimize the lung dose and reduce the dose to the heart.

Methods and Materials: The standard technique consists of an anterior mixed electron/photon IM-MS field. In the improved technique, an oblique electron and an oblique asymmetric photon field are combined to irradiate the IM lymph nodes. To irradiate the MS lymph nodes, a combination of an anterior electron and an anterior asymmetric photon field is used. For both the standard and the improved technique, tangential photon fields are used to irradiate the breast. Three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning was performed for 8 patients with various breast sizes for these two techniques. Dose–volume histograms (DVHs) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) were compared for both techniques. The field dimensions and energy of the standard technique were determined at simulation, whereas for the improved technique the fields were designed by CT-based treatment planning.

Results: The dose in the breast planning target volume was essentially the same for both techniques. For the improved technique, combined with 3D localization information, an improvement in the IM-MS planning target coverage is seen. The volume within the 95% isodose surface was on average 25% (range, 0–64%) and 74% (range, 43–90%) for the standard and improved technique, respectively. The heart generally receives less dose with the improved technique. However, sometimes a small but acceptable increase in lung dose is found.

Conclusion: The improved technique, combined with localization information of the IM-MS lymph nodes, greatly improves the dose distribution in the planning target volume for a large group of patients without significantly increasing the dose to organs at risk.     

Potential role of intensity-modulated photons and protons in the treatment of the breast and regional nodes

PURPOSE: To investigate, using comparative treatment planning, the potential improvements that could result through the use of intensity-modulated photons (intensity-modulated radiation therapy [IMRT]) and protons for the locoregional treatment of complex-target breast cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using CT data from a breast cancer patient, treatment plans were computed using "standard" photon/electron, IMRT, and forward-planned proton techniques. A dose of 50 Gy was prescribed to the target volume consisting of the involved breast, internal mammary, supraclavicular, and axillary nodes. The standard plan was designed using 6-MV X-ray beams to the breast, axillary, and supraclavicular areas and a mixture of 6-MV X-rays and 12-MeV electrons for the internal mammary nodes. Two IMRT (IMX1 and IMX2) plans were calculated for nine evenly spaced beams using dose-volume constraints to the organs at risk. For plan IMX1, precedence was given to optimizing the reduction in lung and heart dose while preserving target dose homogeneity. For plan IMX2, an increased precedence was given to the lungs, heart, and contralateral breast to further reduce doses to these organs and to study the effect on target coverage. The proton plan consisted of two oblique, energy-modulated fields. Target dose homogeneity and the doses to neighboring organs were both considered when comparing the different plans. RESULTS: For the standard plan, dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the target volumes showed severe dose heterogeneity, whereas target coverage for the IMRT and proton plans was comparable. Lung DVHs for the standard and IMRT plans were also comparable, while the proton plan showed the best sparing over all dose levels. Mean doses to the ipsilateral lung for the three plans were found to be 17 Gy, 15 Gy, and 13 Gy for the standard, IMRT, and proton plans, respectively. For the heart, the IMRT plan delivered the highest mean dose (16 Gy), reflecting the extra dose delivered through this organ to spare the lungs. This was reduced somewhat by the standard plan (15 Gy), with the best sparing being provided by the proton plan (6 Gy). When the IMRT plan was reoptimized with an increased precedence to the normal tissues, the mean doses to all neighboring organs at risk could be reduced, but only at the cost of substantial target dose heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: In comparison with the standard plan, IMRT photons have the potential to greatly improve the target dose homogeneity with only a small increase in the doses delivered to the neighboring critical structures. However, when attempting to further reduce doses to the critical structures, substantial loss of target dose homogeneity was found. In conclusion, only the two-field, energy-modulated proton plan had the potential to preserve target dose homogeneity while simultaneously minimizing the dose delivered to both lungs, heart, and the contralateral breast.     

Adjuvant Radiotherapy after Breast Conserving Treatment for Breast Cancer:A Dosimetric Comparison between Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy

Background: Radiotherapy is an important treatment of choice for breast cancer patients after breastconservingsurgery, and we compare the feasibility of using dual arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT2),single arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT1) and Multi-beam Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy(M-IMRT) on patients after breast-conserving surgery. Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with breastcancer (half right-sided and half left-sided) treated by conservative lumpectomy and requiring whole breastradiotherapy with tumor bed boost were planned with three different radiotherapy techniques: 1) VMAT1; 2)VMAT2; 3) M-IMRT. The distributions for the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs) werecompared. Dosimetries for all the techniques were compared. Results: All three techniques satisfied the doseconstraint well. VMAT2 showed no obvious difference in the homogeneity index (HI) and conformity index(CI) of the PTV with respect to M-IMRT and VMAT1. VMAT2 clearly improved the treatment efficiency andcan also decrease the mean dose and V5Gy of the contralateral lung. The mean dose and maximum dose of thespinal cord and contralateral breast were lower for VMAT2 than the other two techniques. The very low dosedistribution (V1Gy) of the contralateral breast also showed great reduction in VMAT2 compared with the othertwo techniques. For the ipsilateral lung of right-sided breast cancer, the mean dose was decreased significantlyin VMAT2 compared with VMAT1 and M-IMRT. The V20Gy and V30Gy of the ipsilateral lung of the leftsidedbreast cancer for VMAT2 showed obvious reduction compared with the other two techniques. The heartstatistics of VMAT2 also decreased considerably compared to VMAT1 and M-IMRT. Conclusions: Comparedto the other two techniques, the dual arc volumetric modulated arc therapy technique reduced radiation doseexposure to the organs at risk and maintained a reasonable target dose distribution.