Primary care nurses using guidelines in Thailand: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Nurses run primary health centres in Thailand. We examined whether clinical guidelines improved the quality of the care they provide. METHODS: Eighteen nurse-led health centres randomized to (a) guidelines, receiving a training workshop plus educational outreach visit, with guidelines for children (acute respiratory tract infection and diarrhoea) and adults (diazepam prescribing and diabetes management) or (b) usual care. Outcomes were changes at 6 months in antibiotic use, diazepam prescribing, drug costs per patient, and a composite process index for diabetes care. RESULTS: Baseline prescribing was high for antibiotics (37% of all attendees), and no difference between intervention and control sites was detected at follow-up for this variable. In children (0-5 years old), antibiotics were widely used for acute respiratory tract infection (34%), and fell with guidelines (intervention: 42% at baseline to 27% at follow-up; control: 27-30%, P=0.022), with an associated fall in drug costs per patient. Antibiotics were widely prescribed for diarrhoea in children (91%), but no change was detected with guidelines. In adults, diazepam prescribing at baseline was high (17%), and fell in the guidelines group (intervention: 17-10%; control 21-18%; P=0.029). Diabetes care was generally good, and changed little with guidelines. CONCLUSION: Staff at primary health centres over-prescribe antibiotics in children and tranquilizer in adults. Clinical guidelines implemented with workshops and educational outreach visits improved some but not all aspects of prescribing in the short-term.     

Factors associated with the frequency of house calls by primary care physicians

Objective:To evaluate factors associated with the frequency of house calls by primary care physicians. Design:A cross-sectional design with a self-administered mailed survey. Setting/participants:751 primary care physicians who care for Medicaid patients in Virginia. Results:Among 389 physician respondents (52%), regular house callers (n=216) were compared with occasional house callers (n=162). Among physician characteristics, specialty and practice duration were associated with house call frequency. Regular house callers also more often cited chronic illness (67% vs. 20%, p<0.01) and terminal illness (67% vs. 40%, p<0.01) as indications for house calls, compared with occasional house callers. Use of visiting nurses to substitute for physician house calls was less often considered appropriate by frequent house callers (7% vs. 24%, p<0.01), and regular house callers were less likely to report being “too busy” to make house calls (71% vs. 29%, p<0.01). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association of these attitudes with house call frequency. Conclusion:These data suggest that specific attitudes among primary care physicians are associated with house call frequency. Presented in part at the annual meeting of the Society of General Internal Medicine, May 2–4, 1990, Arlington, Virginia. Supported in part by a grant from Virgina Commonwealth University.     

Propensity of HIV patients to seek urgent and emergent care

OBJECTIVE: To assess the propensity of HIV-infected adults to seek care for common symptoms, and to determine whether they would seek care in the emergency department (ED) or with their primary care provider. DESIGN: Cross-sectional interview study. SETTING: Patients in care in the 48 contiguous United States. PARTICIPANTS: A nationally representative group of HIV-infected adults selected using multistage probability sampling. MEASUREMENTS: Subjects were interviewed between January 1996 and April 1997. Patients with advanced disease (past AIDS diagnosis and/or CD4 cell count <200/μL) and early disease were asked how they would seek care for key HIV-associated symptom complexes. Three advanced disease and 3 early disease symptom scenarios were used. MAIN RESULTS: Most advanced disease patients (78% to 87%) would seek care right away from the ED or primary care provider for the symptoms asked. Most early disease patients (82%) would seek care right away for new respiratory symptoms; fewer would do so for headache (46%) or oral white patches (62%). In a multivariate model, independent predictors of propensity to use the ED for advanced disease symptoms included African-American ethnicity (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.8 to 3.4); less education (adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.7); drug dependence (adjusted OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.7); annual income less than $5,000 (adjusted OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.3); and lower psychological well-being (adjusted OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.9 to 1.0). In early disease, the following independently predicted ED use: African American (adjusted OR, 4.7; 95% CI, 3.1 to 7.1) or Hispanic ethnicity (adjusted OR 2.4; 95% CI, 1.4 to 4.3), female gender (adjusted OR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2 to 2.2), annual income less than $5,000 (adjusted OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 3.0), and lower psychological well-being (adjusted OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.8 to 1.0). CONCLUSIONS: Many patients would use the ED instead of same-day primary care for several common symptoms of HIV disease. African Americans, the poor, and patients with psychological symptoms had a higher propensity to use the ED. Presented in part at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Cambridge, Mass, October 25–28, 1998. This work was conducted under cooperative agreement HS08578 (M.F. Shapiro, Pl; S.A. Bozzette, Co-Pl) between RAND and the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Substantial additional support for this agreement was provided by the Health Resources and Services Administration, the National Institute for Mental Health and the National Institute for Drug Abuse. Additional support was provided by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Princeton, NJ; Merck & Co., West Point, Pa; Glaxo-Wellcome Inc., Research Triangle Park, NC; the National Institute on Aging; and the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation in the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC. Dr. Gifford is supported by the Department of Veteran Affairs. Dr. Bozzette is a Health Services Research and Development Senior Research Associate of the Department of Veterans’ Affairs.     

Intention to discontinue care among primary care patients

BACKGROUND: Specific elements of health care process and physician behavior have been shown to influence disenrollment decisions in HMOs, but not in outpatient settings caring for patients with diverse types of insurance coverage. OBJECTIVE: To examine whether physician behavior and process of care affect patients' intention to return to their usual health care practice. DESIGN: Cross-sectional patient survey and medical record review. SETTING: Eleven academically affiliated primary care medicine practices in the Boston area. PATIENTS: 2,782 patients with at least one visit in the preceding year. MEASUREMENT: Unwillingness to return to the usual health care practice. RESULTS: Of the 2,782 patients interviewed, 160 (5.8%) indicated they would not be willing to return. Two variables correlated significantly with unwillingness to return after adjustment for demographics, health status, health care utilization, satisfaction with physician's technical skill, site of care, and clustering of patients by provider: dissatisfaction with visit duration (odds ratio [OR], 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4 to 7.4) and patient reports that the physician did not listen to what the patient had to say (OR, 8.8; 95% CI, 2.5 to 30.7). In subgroup analysis, patients who were prescribed medications at their last visit but who did not receive an explanation of the purpose of the medication were more likely to be unwilling to return (OR, 4.9; 95% CI, 1.8 to 13.3). CONCLUSION: Failure of physicians to acknowledge patient concerns, provide explanations of care, and spend sufficient time with patients may contribute to patients' decisions to discontinue care at their usual site of care.     

Delivering effective primary care to older adults: a randomized, controlled trial of the senior resource team at group health cooperative

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of a team of geriatrics specialists on the practice style of primary care providers (PCPs) and the functioning of their patients aged 75 and older.
DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial.
SETTING: Two primary care clinics in the Seattle, Washington, area.
PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-one PCPs and 874 patients aged 75 and older.
INTERVENTION: An interdisciplinary team of geriatrics specialists worked with patients and providers to enhance the geriatric focus of care.
MEASUREMENTS: Main outcomes were a practice style reflecting a geriatric orientation and patient scores on the physical and affect subscales of the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scale 2—Short Form. Secondary outcomes were hospitalizations, incident disability in activities of daily living (ADLs), and PCP perceptions of the intervention. Death rates were also assessed.
RESULTS: Intervention providers screened significantly more for geriatric syndromes at 12 months, but this finding did not persist at 24 months. There were no significant differences in adequate hypertension control or high-risk prescribing at 12 or 24 months of follow-up. There were no significant differences in patient functioning or significant differences in hospitalization rates at either time point. Meaningful differences were observed in ADL disability at 12 but not 24 months. PCPs viewed the intervention favorably. Seventy-eight participants died over the 24 months of follow-up; the proportion dying was higher in the intervention group (11.4% in intervention group vs 7.1% of controls, P =.03).
CONCLUSION: The addition of an interdisciplinary geriatric team was acceptable to PCPs and had some effect on care of geriatric conditions but little effect on patient function or the use of inpatient care and was associated with greater mortality.     

Increased satisfaction with care and lower costs: results of a randomized trial of in-home palliative care

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether an in-home palliative care intervention for terminally ill patients can improve patient satisfaction, reduce medical care costs, and increase the proportion of patients dying at home. DESIGN: A randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: Two health maintenance organizations in two states. PARTICIPANTS: Homebound, terminally ill patients (N=298) with a prognosis of approximately 1 year or less to live plus one or more hospital or emergency department visits in the previous 12 months. INTERVENTION: Usual versus in-home palliative care plus usual care delivered by an interdisciplinary team providing pain and symptom relief, patient and family education and training, and an array of medical and social support services. MEASUREMENTS: Measured outcomes were satisfaction with care, use of medical services, site of death, and costs of care. RESULTS: Patients randomized to in-home palliative care reported greater improvement in satisfaction with care at 30 and 90 days after enrollment (P<.05) and were more likely to die at home than those receiving usual care (P<.001). In addition, in-home palliative care subjects were less likely to visit the emergency department (P=.01) or be admitted to the hospital than those receiving usual care (P<.001), resulting in significantly lower costs of care for intervention patients (P=.03). CONCLUSION: In-home palliative care significantly increased patient satisfaction while reducing use of medical services and costs of medical care at the end of life. This study, although modest in scope, presents strong evidence for reforming end-of-life care.     

Controlled trial of multidisciplinary care teams for acutely ill medical inpatients: enhanced multidisciplinary care

Background: Acute hospital general medicine services care for ageing complex patients, using the skills of a range of health‐care providers. Evidence suggests that comprehensive early assessment and discharge planning may improve efficiency and outcomes of care in older medical patients. Aim: To enhance assessment, communication, care and discharge planning by restructuring consistent, patient‐centred multidisciplinary teams in a general medicine service. Methods: Prospective controlled trial enrolling 1538 consecutive medical inpatients. Intervention units with additional allied health staff formed consistent multidisciplinary teams aligned with inpatient admitting units rather than wards; implemented improved communication processes for early information collection and sharing between disciplines; and specified shared explicit discharge goals. Control units continued traditional, referral‐based multidisciplinary models with existing staffing levels. Results: Access to allied health services was significantly enhanced. There was a trend to reduced index length of stay in the intervention units (7.3 days vs 7.8 days in control units, P = 0.18), with no change in 6‐month readmissions. In‐hospital mortality was reduced from 6.4 to 3.9% (P = 0.03); less patients experienced functional decline in hospital (P = 0.04) and patients’ ratings of health status improved (P = 0.02). Additional staffing costs were balanced by potential bed‐day savings. Conclusion: This model of enhanced multidisciplinary inpatient care has provided sustainable efficiency gains for the hospital and improved patient outcomes.     

Attitude of health care workers to patients and colleagues infected with human immunodeficiency virus

Discrimination against persons living with HIV/AIDS in hospital settings has been documented. This study examined the attitude of health care workers (HCWs) to nurses, doctors and patients infected with HIV. A total of 345 respondents selected by multistage sampling techniques were surveyed, using a semi-structured questionnaire, which explored respondents' attitude to HIV-infected patients and colleagues with HIV/AIDS. HCWs were unwilling to accept that medical procedures be carried out on them by HIVinfected doctors and nurses, with almost 80% refusing surgery or assistance at surgery on them by an HIV-infected doctor or nurse. They were also significantly more unwilling to accept that medical procedures be carried out on them by an infected colleague, compared with their carrying out the same procedure on an HIV-infected patient. Thus, HCWs seemed to believe that the risk of contracting HIV was higher if an infected HCW were to perform medical procedures on them, and fear of contracting HIV seemed to be the driving force for their negative attitudes. Education on occupational risks of HIV, provision of a safe working environment with enforcement of universal precautions, as well as provision of post-exposure prophylaxis are suggested as ways to enable HCWs to change their attitudes.     

Primary care delivery is associated with greater physician experience and improved survival among persons with AIDS

OBJECTIVE: It has been shown that greater physician experience in the care of persons with AIDS prolongs survival, but how more experienced primary care physicians achieve better outcomes is not known. DESIGN/SETTING/PATIENTS: Retrospective cohort study of HIV-infected patients enrolled in a large staff-model health maintenance organization from 1990 through 1999. MEASUREMENTS: Adjusted odds of medical service delivery and adjusted hazard ratio of death by physician experience level (least, moderate, most) and service utilization. MAIN RESULTS: Primary care delivery by physicians with greater AIDS experience was associated with improved survival. After controlling for disease severity, patients cared for by the most experienced physicians were twice as likely to receive a primary care visit in a given month compared with patients of the least and moderately experienced physicians (P <.01). Patients of the least experienced physicians received the lowest level of outpatient pharmacy and laboratory services (P <.001) and were half as likely to have a specialty care visit compared with patients of the most and moderately experienced physicians (P <.05). Patients who received infrequent primary care visits by the least experienced physicians were 15.3 times more likely to die than patients of the most experienced physicians (P =.02). There was a significant increase in primary care services delivered to the population of HIV-infected patients receiving care in 1999, when highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) was in general use, compared with the time period prior to the introduction of HAART. CONCLUSIONS: Primary care delivery by physicians with greater HIV experience contributes to improved patient outcomes.     

Nurse case management to improve the hepatitis C care continuum in HIV co‐infection: Results of a randomized controlled trial

The opportunity to eliminate hepatitis C virus (HCV) is at hand, but challenges remain that negatively influence progress through the care continuum, particularly for persons co‐infected with HIV who are not well engaged in care. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to test the effect of nurse case management (NCM) on the HCV continuum among adults co‐infected with HIV compared to usual care (UC). Primary outcomes included linkage to HCV care (attendance at an HCV practice appointment within 60 days) and time to direct‐acting antiviral (DAA) initiation (censored at 6 months). Sixty‐eight participants were enrolled (NCM n = 35; UC n = 33). Participants were 81% Black/African American, 85% received Medicaid, 46% reported illicit drug use, 41% alcohol use, and 43% had an undetectable HIV viral load. At day 60, 47% of NCM participants linked to HCV care compared to 25% of UC participants (P = .031; 95% confidence bound for difference, 3.2%‐40.9%). Few participants initiated DAAs (12% NCM; 25% UC). There was no significant difference in mean time to treatment initiation (NCM = 86 days; UC = 110 days; P = .192). Engagement in HCV care across the continuum was associated with drinking alcohol, knowing someone who cured HCV and having a higher CD4 cell count (P < .05). Our results support provision of NCM as a successful strategy to link persons co‐infected with HIV to HCV care, but interventions should persist beyond linkage to care. Capitalizing on social networks, treatment pathways for patients who drink alcohol, and integrated substance use services may help improve the HCV care continuum.     

Unmet needs among men with human immunodeficiency virus in community mental health care: a cross-sectional study

While community-based mental health services play an important role in caring for persons with HIV (human immunodeficiency virus) and co-existing mental health disorders, the extent to which their support needs are addressed in this setting is unknown. Accordingly, we examined if HIV infection was associated with unmet support needs among men living with and without HIV receiving community mental health care. This cross-sectional study examined 215 men (135 living with HIV and 80 without HIV) receiving case management services in urban Ontario. Using the Camberwell Assessment of Need, we ascertained the prevalence of support needs in 13 domains grouped into three clusters: Basic needs (accommodation, food, benefits, and money management); self-care/functional needs (daytime activities, self-care, and looking after the home); and health/safety needs (physical, psychological distress, psychotic symptoms, safety to self, and safety to others). We used generalized estimating equations with a logit link to examine the association between HIV and unmet need in each domain. Compared to HIV-negative men, men with HIV were more likely to have mood and concurrent disorders, and intellectual and developmental disabilities. Following multivariable analyses, men with HIV had greater unmet needs related to food (odds ratio?+?95% confidence interval: 9.36 (4.03, 21.75), p?<?0.001); money (OR: 1.90 (1.04, 3.47), p?=?0.036) [basic need domains]; psychological distress (OR: 2.39 (1.68, 3.41), p?<?0.001); drug use (OR: 5.10 (2.16, 12.08) p?<?0.001); and safety to self (OR: 3.35 (1.51, 7.52), p?<?0.003) [health and safety domains]. Despite living in a setting with universal health insurance, men with HIV receiving community mental health support had greater unmet need in basic and health domains than HIV-negative men receiving such support. Further research is required to develop and evaluate interventions to best support community-dwelling persons with HIV and mental health disorders.     

Screening for depression in patients in long-term care facilities: a randomized controlled trial of physician response

OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of a screening protocol using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) on the frequency of primary care physicians' decisions to prescribe drug therapy or refer long-term care patients with possible depression to mental health care. DESIGN: Case-finding phase, followed by a randomized controlled trial of the effect of a physician-targeted intervention on antidepressant prescribing or referral to mental health services. SETTING: Twenty-two nonacademic long-term care facilities. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred three of 1,602 patients aged 65 and older who met criteria for cognitive function and untreated symptoms of depression. INTERVENTION: The 77 physicians of these patients were randomized as clusters into an early notification (experimental) or a delayed notification (control) group. MEASUREMENTS: Frequency of physician response (mental health consult or antidepressant therapy) at 4 and 8 weeks from notification, physician follow-up, and factors associated with physician response. RESULTS: Frequency of physician response in the early group (25%) was greater than in the delayed group (2%) (P <.005) 4 weeks from baseline. Physician response rate when the groups were combined was 36% (95% confidence interval (CI) = 26%-46%) 8 weeks from notification. Overall, there was evidence of physician action after letters of notification in 69% (95% CI = 60%-78%) of cases. Univariate logistic regression suggested that physicians' decisions were primarily associated with physician-related characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Screening of long-term care patients for depression can increase the frequency of treatment or referral by primary care physicians.     

A randomized controlled trial of recovery management checkups for primary care patients: Twelve-month results

Background

Primary care settings like federally qualified health centers (FQHC) are optimal locations to identify individuals with substance use disorders (SUD) and link them to SUD treatment, yet successful linkage has proven difficult. Recovery management checkups for primary care (RMC-PC) is a promising method for increasing linkage to care, engagement in treatment, and reducing substance use.

Methods

Participants (n = 266) who received screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment (SBIRT) at four FQHC sites and needed SUD treatment were randomized to receive SBIRT only or SBIRT+RMC-PC. All participants received SBIRT prior to randomization as part of usual care while those in the experimental group also received quarterly checkups. All participants completed research interviews at enrollment and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months post-enrollment. The primary outcome was whether participants received any days of SUD treatment. Key secondary outcomes were days of SUD treatment (total and by SUD level of care), days of alcohol or drug abstinence, and a reduction in days of specific substance use, all based on self-report.

Results

Relative to participants receiving SBIRT only, participants assigned to SBIRT+RMC-PC were significantly more likely to have received any SUD treatment over 12 months (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 3.85) and more days of SUD treatment over 12 months (Cohen's effect size d = +0.41). The SBIRT+RMC-PC group also reported significantly more days of abstinence over 12 months (d = +0.30), fewer days of alcohol use (d = −0.20) and cannabis use (d = −0.20), and lower combined substance use frequency (d = −0.25). Days of treatment were found to positively mediate the direct effect of SBIRT+RMC-PC on days of abstinence.

Conclusion

This study provides further evidence of the effectiveness of the “referral to treatment” component of SBIRT when combined with RMC for patients in primary care settings, including those with drug use problems. Moreover, results demonstrate the value of repeated checkups on longer-term treatment and substance use outcomes.     

Evaluation of a web-based intervention in patients with chronic human immunodeficiency virus infection: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background:The infection of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is 1 of the major causes of morbidity and mortality in the world. People with chronic diseases have a higher risk of depression. The HIV people are more likely to suffer from depression. Appropriate psychosocial interventions are effective, but their accessibility is limited by the resources needed for their transmission. Thus, it makes sense to develop more cost-effective alternatives, for instance the web-based intervention (WBI), which may be effective for the well-being and depression. The aim of our program is to explore the effects of a WBI on depressive symptoms and well-being in HIV-infected patients.Method:It is a randomized controlled experiment to be conducted from February 2021 to July 2021. It was permitted through the Ethics Committee of Changshan County People''s Hospital (no.60928376). This study includes 100 HIV patients. Inclusion criteria: (1)18 + years, on effective antiretroviral therapy≥ 1 year before inclusion. Exclusion criteria: patients with severe kidney, liver, lung, and heart diseases. Patients are divided randomly into the study group and control group, each group is assigned 50. The primary results are subjective well-being and depressive symptoms, while the secondary result involves the patients’ satisfaction with life.Results:The following Table 1 will exhibit the comparison of outcomes between 2 groups.Conclusion:HIV infected patients can benefit from WBI, which can be utilized as an adjunct to medical treatment.Trial registration number:researchregistry6215.     

Structure and quality of outpatient care for people living with an HIV infection

Policy-makers and clinicians are faced with a gap of evidence to guide policy on standards for HIV outpatient care. Ongoing debates include which settings of care improve health outcomes, and how many HIV-infected patients a health-care provider should treat to gain and maintain expertise. In this article, we evaluate the studies that link health-care facility and care provider characteristics (i.e., structural factors) to health outcomes in HIV-infected patients. We searched the electronic databases MEDLINE, PUBMED, and EMBASE from inception until 1 January 2015. We included a total of 28 observational studies that were conducted after the introduction of combination antiretroviral therapy in 1996. Three aspects of the available research linking the structure to quality of HIV outpatient care were evaluated: (1) assessed structural characteristics (i.e., health-care facility and care provider characteristics); (2) measures of quality of HIV outpatient care; and (3) reported associations between structural characteristics and quality of care. Rather than scarcity of data, it is the diversity in methodology in the identified studies and the inconsistency of their results that led us to the conclusion that the scientific evidence is too weak to guide policy in HIV outpatient care. We provide recommendations on how to address this heterogeneity in future studies and offer specific suggestions for further reading that could be of interest for clinicians and researchers.     

HIV Risk Screening in the Primary Care Setting: Assessment of Physicians' Skills

OBJECTIVE: To assess the content and extent of HIV risk assessment by primary care physicians across a diverse panel of patients with unidentified HIV risk behaviors. DESIGN: Standardized patient examination to assess primary care physicians' skills at identifying and managing HIV infection and overall clinical skills. In a day of testing, physicians saw 13-16 standardized patients (SPs) with diverse case presentations. In analyses presented here, physician performance was examined with nine SPs who had unidentified risks for HIV, which they offered if asked. SETTING: An academic clinic. PATIENTS: We randomly selected 134 paid volunteers (general internists and family/general practitioners) after stratifying by specialty, experience caring for patients with HIV infection, and year of medical school graduation. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Performance at initiating HIV risk screening and identifying patients' HIV risk behaviors were the main outcome measures. Physicians performed variably at HIV risk screening with different patients and across different HIV risk screening topics. Although physicians initiated screening with 60% of patients, they identified only 49% of risk behaviors and included HIV in the differential diagnosis for less than half of at-risk patients. Physicians performed better with cases in which there was a higher probability of HIV infection based on symptoms, but often did not screen at-risk patients without obvious symptoms suggestive of HIV. Board-certified general internists initiated screening and identified risk behaviors with more patients than board-certified family practitioners. Medical school graduation year also influenced performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that primary care physicians do not routinely perform HIV risk assessments with patients who have risk behaviors for HIV infection. Methods are needed to develop, standardize, and disseminate better screening techniques to identify patients with or at risk of developing HIV infection, such as written HIV risk screening questions for use in medical intake forms.     

Disparities in HIV treatment and physician attitudes about delaying protease inhibitors for nonadherent patients

BACKGROUND: Current HIV treatment guidelines recommend delaying antiretroviral therapy for nonadherent patients, which some fear may disproportionately affect certain populations and contribute to disparities in care. OBJECTIVES: To examine the relationship of physician's attitude toward prescribing protease inhibitors (PIs) to nonadherent patients with disparities in PI use and with health outcomes. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND SETTING: A national probability sample of HIV-infected adults in the United States and their health care providers was surveyed between January 1996 and January 1998. We analyzed data on 1717 patients eligible for PI treatment and the 367 providers who cared for them. MEASUREMENTS: Providers' attitude toward prescribing PIs to nonadherent patients, time until patients' first receipt of PIs, mortality, and physical health status. MAIN RESULTS: Eighty-nine percent of providers agreed that patient adherence is important in their decision to prescribe PIs (Selective) while 11% disagreed (Nonselective). Patients who had a Selective provider received PIs later than those with a Nonselective provider (P =.05). Adjusting for patient demographics and health characteristics and provider demographics, HIV knowledge, and experience, Latinos, women, and poor patients received PIs later if their provider had a Selective attitude but as soon as others if their provider had a Nonselective attitude. African-American patients received PIs later than whites, irrespective of their providers' prescribing attitude. Patients with Selective providers had similar odds of mortality than those with Nonselective providers (odds ratio, 1.1; 95% confidence interval, 0.6 to 2.0), but had slightly worse adjusted physical health status at follow-up (49.1 vs 50.4, respectively; P =.04), after controlling for baseline physical health status and other patient and provider covariates. CONCLUSIONS: Most providers consider patient adherence an important factor in their decision to prescribe PIs. This attitude appears to account for the relatively later use of PI treatment among Latinos, women, and the poor. Given the rising HIV infection rates among minorities, women, and the poor, further investigation of this treatment strategy and its impact on HIV resistance and outcomes is warranted.