Hiatal hernia size is the dominant determinant of esophagitis presence and severity in gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVE: Although reflux esophagitis is a multifactorial disease, the relative importance of these pathogenetic factors has not been clearly established. In this study, regression analysis was used to model the major determinants of esophagitis in patients with symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Sixty-six GERD patients and 16 asymptomatic controls were evaluated. All patients underwent upper endoscopy, esophageal manometry, and 24-h pH monitoring. Esophagrams were performed in 38 of the GERD patients and all controls. Stepwise regression was performed using esophagitis severity as the dependent variable. Logistic regression was performed grouping subjects as controls, nonerosive GERD, or erosive esophagitis. RESULTS: Hiatal hernia size, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, esophageal acid exposure, and number of reflux episodes >5 min significantly correlated with esophagitis severity. Stepwise regression identified hiatal hernia size (p = 0.0001) and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (p = 0.0024) as significant predictors of esophagitis. Logistic regression also identified hiatal hernia size (chi2 = 17.07, p < 0.0001) and lower esophageal sphincter pressure (chi2 = 5.97, p = 0.0146) as significant predictors of erosive esophagitis. CONCLUSION: Esophagitis severity is best predicted by hiatal hernia size and lower esophageal sphincter pressure. Of these, hiatal hernia size is the strongest predictor.     

Differences in clinical characteristics between patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease and erosive esophagitis in Japan

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori infection and atrophic gastritis are inversely related to erosive esophagitis. Whether these factors affect the pathogenesis of endoscopy-negative reflux disease is not clear. We aimed to elucidate the differences in clinical characteristics between endoscopy-negative erosive disease and erosive esophagitis. METHODS: 253 subjects (89 with endoscopy-negative reflux disease and 164 with erosive esophagitis) were studied. Gastric atrophy was assessed by measurement of serum pepsinogen. Logistic regression was used to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with erosive esophagitis. RESULTS: Among GERD patients, female gender (OR = 2.27, 95% CI, 1.25-4.10), smoking (OR = 0.45, 95% CI, 0.22-0.91), and the presence of hiatal hernia (OR = 0.30, 95% CI, 0.17-0.56) were significantly associated with endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with male gender, not smoking, and absence of hiatal hernia, respectively. Body mass index (BMI) was also significantly associated with a decreased OR for endoscopy-negative reflux disease. Although H. pylori infection and gastric atrophy were significantly more common in patients with endoscopy-negative reflux disease, these associations did not persist in a multiple-adjustment model. After adjustment for gender, BMI, smoking, and hiatal hernia, a decrease in serum pepsinogen I/II ratio was significantly associated with an increased OR for endoscopy-negative reflux disease (p for trend = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Female gender, low BMI, not smoking, absence of hiatal hernia, and severity of gastric atrophy were positively associated with endoscopy-negative reflux disease compared with erosive esophagitis among Japanese patients.     

Effect of Helicobacter pylori eradication on gastroesophageal function

BACKGROUND: To elucidate the cause of possible occurrence of reflux esophagitis after Helicobacter pylori eradication, gastric and esophageal function among H. pylori infected Japanese patients were evaluated both before and after eradication therapy. METHODS: Nine H. pylori-positive patients were studied before and 6 months after successful H. pylori eradication. Studies included gastric emptying, esophageal manometry, gastric and esophageal pH monitoring as well as measuring serum levels of gastrin, pepsinogen I and pepsinogen II. RESULTS: Helicobacter pylori eradication was associated with a significant change in serum gastrin and pepsinogen levels, consistent with the improvement in mucosal inflammation. There was no significant change in gastric emptying, fasting or postprandial lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure, esophageal primary peristaltic contractions, frequency of transient LES relaxation, or gastroesophageal reflux, as assessed by 24 h pH monitoring. The percent time of the gastric pH>4 at night decreased significantly. A 41-year-old male developed erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (Los Angeles Classification Grade A) after eradication. Physiological studies showed he had abnormal esophageal motility prior to H. pylori eradication. CONCLUSIONS: With the exception of gastric pH at night, most patients did not experience a significant change in gastric or esophageal function after H. pylori eradication. Development of GERD post H. pylori eradication likely reflects an increase in the acidity of the refluxate superimposed on pre-existing abnormalities in gastroesophageal motility.     

Effect of hiatal hernia on esophageal manometry and pH-metry in gastroesophageal reflux disease

An increased frequency of reflux events and a prolonged acid clearance have been shown in gastroesophageal reflux (GER) patients with a hiatal hernia as compared to those without. The objective of the present study was to further investigate esophageal motility and patterns of reflux in GER patients, in relation to the presence or absence of hiatal hernia. Esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-hr esophageal pH-metry were used in 42 patients with GER and 18 controls. Eighteen of the patients were considered to have a nonreducing hiatal hernia on endoscopy. Hiatal hernia patients showed a higher extent of reflux (total composite score,P=0.016; total reflux time,P=0.008, reflux time in supine position,P=0.024; reflux time in upright position,P=0.008), a lower frequency of reflux events (P=0.005), a more severe esophagitis on endoscopy (P<0.01) and a lower amplitude of peristalsis at 5 cm proximal to LES (P=0.0009) as compared to patients without hiatal hernia. The amplitude of peristalsis at the distal esophagus was inversely related to the extent of reflux (P=0.024). Acid clearance was also significantly prolonged in the hernia subgroup (P=0.011). Although LES resting pressure did not differ significantly between the two subgroups of patients, it was inversely related to the extent of reflux in the patients with hiatal hernia (P=0.0005). It is concluded, that GER patients with hiatal hernia present with an increased amount of reflux and more severe esophagitis, which results in more severely impaired esophageal peristalsis as compared to patients without hernia. Prolonged acid clearance and impaired esophageal emptying observed in patients with hiatal hernia could be the result of both the presence of the hernia itself and the reduced peristaltic activity of the esophagus.     

Clinical value of electrogastrography and the gastric emptying test

OBJECTIVE : To: (i) assess the clinical value of electrogastrography (EGG) and the gastric emptying test; and (ii) investigate the relationship between gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric emptying (GE). METHODS : One hundred and forty patients with functional dyspepsia (FD), 30 patients with non‐insulin‐dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and 20 healthy volunteers were studied. Gastric myoelectrical activity was recorded by using cutaneous EGG. The gastric emptying time was measured by using isotopic, radiopaque marker (Rom’s) and ultrasound methods. RESULTS : The dysrhythmia rates in patients with NIDDM were 70.0% (21/30) before meals and 66.7% (20/30) after meals, and the tachygastria rates of these patients were 36.7% before meals and 33.3% after meals. In NIDDM patients, the dominant frequency (DF) after meals (2.60 ± 0.30 cycles per minute; c.p.m.), the fed DF/fasting DF ratio (1.01 ± 0.11), the dominant power (DP) after meals (121.45 ± 67.00 V² c.p.m.) and the fed DP and fasting DP ratios (0.81 ± 0.07) were significantly lower than those in normal controls (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). The DP after meals in patients with FD (210.60 ± 68.40 V² c.p.m.) was significantly lower than that in normal controls (P < 0.01). Delayed gastric emptying was more common in patients with FD and NIDDM. The rate of delayed gastric emptying in 121 cases with normal myoelectrical rhythm was 39.7% (48/121). In 69 cases with dysrhythmia, 45.9% (17/37) with bradygastria and 78.1% (25/32) with tachygastria had delayed gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS : Electrogastrography and the gastric emptying test are feasible methods for evaluating gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric motility. The precise relationship between gastric myoelectrical activity and gastric motility has not been proven, but there is a close relationship between tachygastria and delayed gastric emptying.     

Cholinergic effects on human gastric motility

BACKGROUND: Cholinergic regulation of chronotropic (frequency) and inotropic (force) aspects of antral contractility and how these impact on gastric emptying are not well delineated. AIMS: To determine the effects of cholinergic stimulation and inhibition on myoelectric, contractile, and emptying parameters of gastric motility. METHODS: Ten normal subjects underwent three studies each, using simultaneous electrogastrography (EGG), antroduodenal manometry, and gastric emptying with dynamic antral scintigraphy (DAS). After 30 minutes of baseline fasting manometry and EGG, subjects received saline intravenously, atropine (0.6 mg then 0.25 mg/hour intravenously), or bethanechol (5 mg subcutaneously). This was followed by another 30 minutes' recording and by three hours of postprandial recording after ingestion of a technetium-99m labelled solid meal. RESULTS: During fasting, atropine decreased, whereas bethanechol increased, the antral manometric motility index and EGG power. Postprandially, atropine decreased the amplitude of antral contractions by DAS, decreased the postprandial antral manometric motility index, and slowed gastric emptying. Atropine caused a slight increase in postprandial frequency of antral contractions by DAS and gastric myoelectrical activity by EGG. Bethanechol slightly increased the amplitude, but slightly decreased the frequency of antral contractions by DAS and decreased the frequency of gastric myoelectrical activity by EGG, with no significant increase in the motility index or gastric emptying. CONCLUSIONS: Cholinergic antagonism with atropine reduces antral contractility and slows gastric emptying. Cholinergic stimulation with bethanechol increases antral contractility, but decreases the frequency of antral contractions, without altering the antral motility index or gastric emptying.     

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in the older patient: presentation, treatment, and complications

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in the elderly. Patients often complain of less severe or frequent heartburn than their younger cohorts, but because of prolonged acid exposure over many years, the elderly have more complicated reflux disease including esophagitis, peptic strictures, and Barrett's esophagus. Potential factors aggravating GERD in the elderly include medications, which reduce lower esophageal sphincter pressure, higher frequency of hiatal hernia, impaired motility, and decreased saliva volume and bicarbonate concentration. Early endoscopy is indicated in all elderly patients with GERD, regardless of symptom severity. The medical and surgical treatment of GERD in the elderly generally follows the same principles as for any adult patient.     

Esophageal motility and gastric emptying in PSS patients, correlation with symptoms

Progressive systemic sclerosis (PSS) commonly involves the esophagus. Dysphagia and heartburn are the most common esophageal symptoms. In this study we evaluated the relationship between esophageal symptoms and esophago-gastric motility. On esophageal manometry, loss of peristalsis, peristaltic contraction amplitude of distal esophagus less than 30 mmHg and decreased LES pressure were critical for esophageal symptoms. The degree of symptoms correlated to esophageal dysmotility. The gastric emptying in PSS patients was delayed, but there was no significant difference in gastric emptying between the patients with and without reflux esophagitis. Esophageal dysmotility is considered to be much responsible for the reflux esophagitis in PSS patients than gastric emptying.     

Impaired Esophageal Emptying in Reflux Disease

Objectives: The symptoms and mncosal damage that occur in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may he a consequence of either an increased frequency of reflux events or of a prolonged process of esophageal acid clearance. Acid clearance is dependent both upon effective esophageal emptying of luminal fluid and on normal salivary function to titrate residual acid to neutrality. This investigation examined the efficacy of esophageal emptying in a large group of GERD patients. Methods: Barium swallow examinations were done to categorize and quantify esophageal emptying dysfunction in 67 consecutive patients with reflux disease, compared with 85 patient asymptomatic controls. Quantitative fluoroscopic estimates of esophageal residua were compared with scintigraphic quantiflcation in 14 controls and 20 GERD patients. Results: There was progressive impairment of esophageal emptying in the reflux patients without esophagitis compared with the controls, and it was even greater in patients with endoscopically evident esophagitis compared with reflux patients without esophagitis. Good correlation existed hetween the fluoroscopic and scintigraphic assessment of esophageal emptying. Conclusions: These flndings support the hypothesis that impaired esophageal emptying is an important determinant in the development of esophagitis among reflux patients. The dominant site of impaired emptying in the reflux patients was the phrenic ampulla as opposed to the tuhular esophagus, suggesting a pathophysiological contribution of hiatus hernia.     

Is ineffective esophageal motility gastropharyngeal reflux disease？

AIM： TO evaluate the association between IEM and gastropharyngeal reflux disease （GPRD） in patients who underwent ambulatory 24-h dual-probe pH monitoring for the evaluation of supraesophageal symptoms.
METHODS： A total of 632 patients who underwent endoscopy, esophageal manometry and ambulatory 24-h dual-pH monitoring due to supraesophageal symptoms （e.g. globus, hoarseness, or cough） were enrolled. Of them, we selected the patients who had normal esophageal motility and IEM. The endoscopy and ambulatory pH monitoring findings were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS;： A total of 264 patients with normal esophageal motility and 195 patients with the diagnosis of IEM were included in this study. There was no difference in the frequency of reflux esophagitis and hiatal hernia between the two groups. All the variables showing gastroesophageal reflux and gastropharyngeal reflux were not different between the two groups. The frequency of GERD and GPRD, as defined by ambulatory pH monitoring, was not different between the two groups.
CONCLUSION： There was no association between IEM and GPRD as well as between IEM and GERD. IEM alone cannot be considered as a definitive marker for reflux disease.     

Clinical significance of hiatal hernia in the development of gastroesophageal reflux after distal gastrectomy for cancer of the stomach

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sliding hernia is controversial, especially following distal partial gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and sliding hernia of the esophagus after distal gastrectomy using the gastroesophageal scintigraphy and endoscopy. METHODS: Forty-five distal gastrectomy patients diagnosed with cancer of the stomach were studied. Twenty-five patients presented with reflux symptoms, such as heartburn and/or regurgitation and 20 patients exhibited no reflux symptoms. All of the patients were examined by gastroesophageal scintigraphy and their reflux indices were determined. Thirty-eight of the patients underwent upper endoscopy and both sliding hernias and reflux symptoms were classified as mild or severe. RESULTS: Sliding hernias were diagnosed in all of the subjects and 65.8% of the patients exhibited reflux symptoms. Evidence of endoscopic esophagitis was noted in only 39.5% of the patients. The reflux indices for the mild and severe hernia groups were 5.03 +/- 2.2 and 10.3 +/- 6.4, respectively (P < 0.05). More severely symptomatic esophagitis was prevalent in the severe hernia group in comparison to the mild group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the onset of gastroesophageal reflux after distal gastrectomy is induced by the surgical procedures and that hiatal hernia may be an important factor in the etiology of reflux esophagitis.     

The importance of hiatal hernia in reflux esophagitis compared with lower esophageal sphincter pressure or smoking.

The characteristics of gastroesophageal reflux disease have not been adequately defined. To determine the influence on the esophageal mucosa of hiatal hernia, lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid reflux, and cigarettes and alcohol, we studied the reflux parameters, smoking habits, and alcohol consumption of 184 healthy, ambulatory outpatients who received endoscopy as the initial diagnostic procedure for workup of gastroesophageal reflux. Patients received endoscopic and histologic evaluations of the esophageal mucosa, prolonged ambulatory esophageal pH monitoring, and esophageal manometric determinations. Structural analysis was used to test the plausibility of various clinical theories concerning the most important factors contributing to the development of esophagitis. Statistical analyses revealed the following: (a) the lower esophageal sphincter pressure, acid contact time, and frequency of reflux episodes were highly associated with the presence of a hiatal hernia (p less than 0.003 for all parameters); (b) individuals with esophagitis had 16.5 times as many hiatal hernias as found in normal, healthy people; (c) cigarette smoking was not correlated with esophagitis but was significantly associated with increased lower esophageal sphincter pressure (r = 0.18; p less than 0.03); and (d) smoking was also not associated with increased acid contact time or increased frequency of reflux episodes. We conclude that (a) the presence of a hiatal hernia, not the pressure of the lower esophageal sphincter, is the most important predictor of reflux frequency, acid contact time, and esophagitis; (b) a decreased lower esophageal sphincter pressure, as suggested by structural analysis, is unlikely to be the cause of increased reflux episodes or esophagitis; and (c) if smoking and lower esophageal sphincter pressure are factors in the development of esophagitis, they damage the esophageal mucosa by mechanisms other than increased frequency of reflux episodes or increased acid contact time.     

No association between gallstones and gastroesophageal reflux disease

OBJECTIVES: Gallstones and hiatal hernia reportedly have been linked to similar dietary factors prevalent in western countries, and patients with cholelithiasis or previous cholecystectomy have been reported to have more duodenogastric reflux than healthy controls. Nonetheless, the contribution of duodenogastric reflux to the development of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) remains controversial. The present study was aimed to assess the association between gallstone disease and GERD. METHODS: Outpatients from general medical clinics who underwent upper GI endoscopy and abdominal ultrasonography were recruited into a case-control study. A case population of 790 patients with various grades of GERD was compared to a control population of 407 patients without GERD. In a multivariate logistic regression, the presence of GERD served as the outcome variable, whereas the presence of gallstones, hiatal hernia, social habits, and demographic characteristics served as predictor variables. RESULTS: No associations were found between the presence of cholelithiasis or previous cholecystectomy and GERD or between the presence of cholelithiasis or previous cholecystectomy and hiatal hernia. The severity of GERD also remained unaffected by the presence of gallstones. The occurrence of GERD was influenced only by hiatal hernia (odds ratio [OR] = 3.15, 95% CI = 2.44-4.08), alcohol consumption (OR = 1.47, CI = 1.08-1.99), and not by cholelithiasis (OR = 1.02, CI = 0.68-1.51), or cholecystectomy (OR = 0.90, CI = 0.64-1.28). The frequency of GERD among hiatus hernia patients with gallstones (437/592 = 74%) was similar to the frequency of GERD among hiatus hernia patients without gallstones (168/220 = 76%, p = 0.516). CONCLUSIONS: Neither cholelithiasis nor cholecystectomy poses a risk for the occurrence of GERD or hiatal hernia. Gallstone disease does not seem to influence the integrity of the esophageal mucosa through GERD.     

ENDOLUMINAL GASTROPLICATION FOR GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX APPEARING AFTER GASTRIC SURGERY

Endoluminal gastroplication (ELGP) is a new endoscopic treatment for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, its efficacy has been reported only for primary GERD but not for postoperative GERD. Here we report the first two cases of GERD that appeared after gastric surgery and were successfully treated by ELGP. Both patients developed GERD after gastric surgery. Esophagogastrofiberscopy showed esophagitis and small hiatal hernia. The symptoms failed to disappear after medical therapy and ELGP was performed. ELGP involved the use of the BARD (EndoCinch^TM) endoscopic suturing system, where two to three plications were placed at the esophagogastric junction. Procedure time, start of soft diet and hospital stay were 55 min, the first postoperative day (POD), 5 days and 60 min, 1 POD and 5 days, for patients 1 and 2, respectively. No adverse events were noted apart from mild and transient epigastric pain. The GERD‐related symptoms markedly improved after ELGP. Improvements were also noted in acid exposure time and bile reflux time after the procedure. ELGP is safe and effective for GERD that develops after surgery although this needs to be confirmed in long‐term follow‐up studies. ELGP is potentially suitable for GERD after Billroth‐I distal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer.     

胃食管反流病胃肌电活动的变化

目的 分析描述胃食管反流病(GERD)患者的胃肌电活动特点,探讨胃肌电活动的变化在GERD发病中的作用,以期有助于临床诊疗.方法 对65例GERD患者和30例健康志愿者进行餐前、餐后体表胃电图监测.根据内镜检查结果,把GERD患者分为反流性食管炎(RE)组、非糜烂性反流病(NERD)组,行组间胃电参数比较,随访19例胃电节律异常的GERD患者,观察治疗前后胃电参数的变化.结果 GERD组的主频(DF)正常慢波节律百分比(N%)、餐前餐后功率比(PR)与对照组相比明显降低(P<0.05或0.01).胃电节律紊乱,以胃动过缓为主.经1周治疗后,GERD异常胃电参数明显正常化(P<0.05或0.01).餐前RE组胃电节律异常的发生率(37.5%)显著高于NERD组(12.1%).餐后胃电节律异常的发生率RE组和NERD组分别为71.9%和60.6%,两者没有统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 GERD患者存在餐前、餐后胃肌电活动异常,异常胃电节律以胃动过缓节律为主,胃电图能为GERD诊断提供依据.     

Increased frequency of transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation induced by gastric distention in reflux patients with hiatal hernia

BACKGROUND & AIMS: This study aimed to determine if hiatal hernia influences vulnerability to reflux and transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (tLESR) during gastric distention in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: Eight normal subjects and 15 patients with GERD were studied. A metal clip attached to the squamocolumnar junction (SCJ) was beneath the hiatus in all control subjects. Eight GERD patients with >/=1-cm SCJ-hiatus separation were considered hernia patients, and 7 with <1-cm separation were considered nonhernia patients. Manometry and esophageal pH were recorded for 30 minutes, after which the stomach was loaded with acid dextrose and the recording continued for 2 hours with intragastric air infusion of 15 mL/min. RESULTS: Baseline reflux was comparable among groups. Gastric distention increased the frequency of reflux by the tLESR mechanism in all groups. Controls and nonhernia patients had median increases of 4.0 and 4.5 in tLESR frequency, respectively, and hernia patients had a median increase of 9.5/h. tLESR frequency was highly correlated with the SCJ-hiatus separation (r = 0.76; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gastric air infusion was a potent stimulus for tLESR and reflux. The resultant tLESR frequency was directly proportional to the separation between the SCJ and hiatus, suggesting that the perturbed anatomy associated with hiatal hernia predisposed to eliciting tLESRs in patients with GERD.     

Impaired gastric motility and its relationship to reflux symptoms in patients with nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease

Background  More than half of patients with refluxrelated symptoms have no endoscopic evidence of mucosal breaks. These patients are considered to have nonerosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (NERD). The pathogenesis of NERD may be multifactorial, but the role played by gastric motility in symptom generation in patients with NERD has not been examined. In this study, we elucidate gastric motility in patients with NERD and the efficacy of a prokinetic agent in the treatment of NERD. Methods  Gastric motility was evaluated with electrogastrography (EGG) and by measurement of gastric emptying using the acetaminophen method in 26 patients with NERD and in 11 matched healthy controls. NERD patients were treated with a prokinetic agent (mosapride 15 mg, orally three times daily) for a period of 4 weeks, after which gastric motility was measured again. Results  Compared with the healthy controls, the NERD patients showed a significantly lower percentage of normogastria, a lower power ratio in EGG, and delayed gastric emptying. Ten patients had normal gastric motor function (group A), and 16 showed abnormalities of either gastric myoelectrical activity or gastric emptying (group B). After treatment with mosapride, gastric motility improved significantly in both groups of patients compared with pretreatment values. The subjective assessment by the patient after the treatment was improved in 20.0% of group A versus 62.5% of group B patients (P < 0.05). Conclusions  Gastric hypomotility appears to be an important factor in reflux symptom generation in some NERD patients.     

Clinical characteristics of Japanese reflux esophagitis patients as determined by Los Angeles classification

BACKGROUND: Recent studies have shown that the number of patients with reflux esophagitis is increasing in Japan, but the prevalence and risk factors associated with reflux esophagitis in Japanese patients are not well defined. METHODS: By using all endoscopic records in the Katta General Hospital from April through to September 1999, we identified 392 patients. We examined the Los Angeles classification, peptic ulcer, gastric mucosal atrophy, hiatal hernia and other medical variable factors for their contribution to esophagitis in the patients. RESULTS: Patients (13.8%) were diagnosed as having reflux esophagitis with a mucosal break. In a multivariate analysis, reflux esophagitis was associated with hiatal hernia (odds ratio (OR) 2.276, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.164-4.450), with patients over 65 years of age (OR 2.521, 95% CI 1.238-5.134) and the open type of gastric mucosal atrophy (OR 0.420, 95% CI 0.225-0.785). There was no significant difference between esophagitis and Helicobacter pylori infection and peptic ulcer. CONCLUSIONS: We observed that age, hiatal hernia and a lower rate of gastric mucosal atrophy were associated with the proportion of mucosal breaks accompanying esophagitis.     

Healing of severe reflux esophagitis with PPI does not improve esophageal dysmotility

Esophageal dysmotility is frequently associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the severity of reflux esophagitis and esophageal dysmotility and evaluate the effect of prolonged treatment with proton pump inhibitor (lansoprazole 30 mg/day) on esophageal motility in patients with severe reflux esophagitis associated with esophageal motility disorder. Twelve healthy subjects (HS) and 100 patients with reflux disease were involved in the study consisting of two parts: (i) comparison of esophageal motility in HS and patients with non-eroseive reflux disease (NERD), mild esophagitis and severe esophagitis; (ii) effect of 3-6 months lansoprazole therapy on esophageal motility in 23 patients with severe esophagitis, pathologic acid reflux and esophageal peristaltic dysfunction. Results included the following. (i) Esophageal dysmotility was noted in both patients with NERD and erosive GERD. (ii) Severe esophagitis was associated with severe esophageal dysmotility. (iii) Healing of severe esophagitis did not improve esophageal dysmotility. The resting lower esophageal sphincter pressure was 3.9 mmHg (range 1.7-20) before treatment and 4.8 mmHg (range 1.2-18.3) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.23, vs. before treatment), the amplitude of distal esophageal contraction was 28.8 mmHg (range 10.9-80.6) before treatment and 33.3 mmHg (range 10.0-72.5) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.59, vs. before treatment) and the frequency of failed peristalsis was 70% (range 0-100%) before treatment and 70% (range 0-100%) after esophagitis healing (P = 0.78, vs. before treatment). Both esophageal motility disorders and acid reflux play important roles in the mechanism of GERD, especially in severe esophagitis. Esophageal dysmotility is not secondary to acid reflux and esophagitis; it should be a primary motility disorder.     

胃食管反流病胃电活动变化的研究

目的　探讨胃食管反流病 (GERD)的胃电活动变化。方法　主诉反流症状的患者 ,经 2 4小时食管酸、碱监测和 (或 )胃镜检查 ,GERD 43例 ,健康对照组 3 9例 ,进行餐前、餐后体表胃电图 (EGG)监测。结果　GERD组的平均正常胃电慢波百分比 ( 63 .40 %± 3 1.63 %)显著低于对照组 ( 80 .89%± 2 5 .42 %) ,餐前胃电节律异常的发生率 ( 5 8.1%)显著高于对照组 ( 17.0 %) ,餐前主频不稳定系数 ( 5 3 .6± 5 0 .8)也显著高于对照组 ( 3 4.2± 3 3 .1) ;GERD组的餐后胃电节律异常的发生率 ( 3 2 .6%)显著高于对照组 ( 12 .8%)。结论　GERD患者存在餐前、餐后胃电活动异常 ,体表EGG检查有助于了解GERD的胃运动功能情况