Liver transplantation in a patient with acute liver failure due to sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis is a potentially catastrophic complication of sickle cell anemia Once acute liver failure develops, transplantation is the only option. We describe a patient with sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis who underwent liver transplantation. METHODS: Data were obtained from the chart. Serial hemoglobin S levels were monitored, and measures were taken to maintain hemoglobin S <20% to prevent sickle cell crisis. RESULTS: Although the allograft functioned well initially, the patient developed veno-occlusive disease and required repeat transplantation at 5 months after transplant. Histologic examination of the explant revealed occlusion of the terminal hepatic venules due to fibrosis and packed red cells. Repeat transplant was complicated by thrombosis of the intrahepatic portion of the hepatic artery, and sepsis. The patient died of sepsis after a third transplant. CONCLUSION: Liver transplantation for sickle cell disease involving the liver may carry a high risk of graft loss due to vascular problems. Repeat transplantation may not be feasible if disease recurs.     

Liver transplantation in sickle cell anemia: a case of acute sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis and a case of sclerosing cholangitis

Very few cases of liver transplantation in patients with sickle cell disease have been reported in peer-reviewed literature. We reviewed the medical records of two patients with sickle cell disease that received liver transplantation at our institution. The first patient was a 27-year-old female who presented with encephalopathy and cholestatic jaundice with a Hemoglobin S (HbS) level of 69.6%. She was diagnosed with acute sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis. The second patient was a 26-year-old female with sclerosing cholangitis who presented with encephalopathy, bleeding, and cholestatic jaundice. Her HbS level was normal. Both patients underwent liver transplantation successfully but died in the postoperative period from multiorgan failure. We report a rare case of liver transplantation for acute sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis and a novel case of transplantation in a patient with sickle cell disease and sclerosing cholangitis. Liver transplantation did not lead to a successful outcome in either case.     

Liver transplantation in a patient with S(beta)o-thalassemia

BACKGROUND: Patients presenting sickle cell disease may develop different types of hepatic complications. Intrahepatic cholestasis is a potentially fatal complication of the disease, and sometimes the only possible solution is transplantation. Postoperative transfusion management has not yet been well established. In this report, we describe the transfusional program of a patient presenting sickle cell disease and intrahepatic cholestasis who underwent liver transplantation 2 years ago. METHODS: Data were obtained from the chart and the blood bank records. RESULTS: The liver transplantation was performed successfully. Despite mild allograft dysfunction 3 months after surgery, secondary to intrahepatic sickling, the patient has been doing well with the transfusional management adopted (sickle-cell hemoglobin <20%). CONCLUSION: Sickle cell disease should not be a criterion for exclusion from liver transplantation. Regular transfusion with monitoring of sickle-cell hemoglobin is a very important measure to minimize the risk of intrahepatic sickling and possible rejection.     

Simultaneous liver and renal transplantation in man

Advanced chronic renal failure has been thought of as a contraindication to liver transplantation. We present here seven cases of simultaneous kidney-liver transplant performed for combined end-organ failure. Six of the seven patients are alive with functioning grafts with follow-up of from 6 weeks to 32 months. In one case, the patient chronically rejected his liver graft (treated with successful retransplant) while maintaining good function in his kidney. The rate of acute rejection in the liver transplant was only 37.5% compared with 59.3% in the patients undergoing liver transplant only. There were no obvious rejections observed in the kidney transplants. These cases demonstrate the utility of simultaneous kidney-liver transplant in patients with combined kidney and liver failure. Advanced chronic renal failure should no longer be considered a contraindication to liver transplantation.     

肝肾胰联合移植的围手术期处理

目的总结肝胰肾联合移植围手术期处理的经验。方法报告肝、胰、肾一期联合移植治疗1例乙型肝炎后肝硬化、肝功能不全合并慢性肾功能不全伴慢性胰腺炎导致胰岛素依赖型糖尿病患者的临床特点及治疗体会。对患者围手术期处理及相关资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用胰液空肠内引流及原位背驮式同期尸体肝、胰、肾联合移植。手术顺利，移植肝脏及胰腺功能1周内逐渐恢复，肾功能延迟恢复。术后第16天因移植肾血流下降，切除移植肾脏，于原移植部位行第2次肾移植，肾功能逐渐恢复正常。至2005年11月随访10个月，患者未发生排斥反应及明显感染，移植肝、胰、肾功能均正常，一般情况良好。结论肝胰肾联合移植技术安全，术后因各脏器对功能恢复所需内环境各不相同，矛盾较多，围手术期处理对患者的长期存活至关重要。     

Liver Transplantation After Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant for the Treatment of Sickle Cell Disease: A Case Report

Sickle cell anemia is the most common of the hemoglobinopathies, in which the abnormal hemoglobin formed in deoxygenation states undergoes a polymerization process with consequent erythrocyte deformation and vaso-occlusive events. The need for multiple blood transfusions, prolonged ineffective erythropoiesis, hemolysis, and increased iron absorption can cause iron overload in the liver, leading to liver fibrosis. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is currently the only treatment with a curative potential for this disease and can establish normal complete or partial donor-derived erythropoiesis and stabilize or restore function in affected organs, preventing further deterioration of function. However, it does not reverse preexisting liver fibrosis and siderosis. One of the possible complications of patients who undergo HSCT is chronic liver disease, which has a multifactorial cause, with iron overload being an important factor. In the long term, the prevalence of chronic liver disease in HSCT patients, including cirrhosis and its complications, can be significant. Solid organ transplantation after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for end-organ failure remains a very rare event. It may offer a valuable treatment strategy in selected recipients, although it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We report the case of a patient with sickle cell anemia who underwent HSCT and developed severe liver dysfunction requiring liver transplantation 13 years after the procedure. We found no previous report in the literature of orthotopic liver transplant after HCT for the treatment of sickle cell disease.     

Living related liver transplantation for acute liver failure in children.

The mortality rate among children with acute liver failure (ALF) on the waiting list for liver transplantation is high. We present our experience with living related donor liver transplantation (LRD-LT) in children who required urgent transplantation for ALF. Between December 1995 and July 1997, 6 children underwent LRD-LT for ALF. Cause of liver failure, recipient and donor demographics, clinical and laboratory data, surgical details, complications, and 6-month and 2-year graft and patient survival were recorded. Five boys and 1 girl received left lateral segment grafts from their parents. The mean age was 4 +/- 2.8 years (range, 1 to 9 years). ALF was caused by Wilson's disease in 1 patient and sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome in 1 patient; in 4 patients, the cause was unknown. All patients had mental status changes; 2 were on life support. Mean pretransplantation liver function test values were: alanine aminotransferase, 972 +/- 565 U/L (normal, 1 to 53 U/L), total bilirubin, 31.3 +/- 12.4 mg/dL (normal, 0.1 to 1.2 mg/dL), prothrombin time, 34.3 +/- 12.4 seconds (normal, 10.8 to 13.3 seconds), international normalized ratio, 8.46 +/- 5.4 (normal < 2), and fibrinogen, 109 +/- 23.9 mg/dL (normal, 175 to 400 mg/dL). The donors were 5 mothers and 1 father. The mean donor age was 32.5 +/- 7.6 years (range, 19 to 40 years). No donor required blood transfusion, and no donor had any early or late postoperative complications. The donors' mean hospital length of stay was 5 days. In five cases, grafts were blood group-compatible; 1 child received a blood group-incompatible graft. All grafts functioned immediately. No patient had hepatic artery or portal vein thrombosis or biliary complications. The child who received a mismatched graft died of infection of the brain caused by Aspergillus spp at 22 days posttransplantation with a functioning graft. The child with ALF caused by sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis syndrome developed outflow obstruction 3 months posttransplantation and required retransplantation; he eventually died of vascular complications related to his primary disease. Four children are alive at a mean follow-up of 27 months (range, 14 to 36 months). LRD-LT for children with ALF facilitates timely transplantation without drawing on cadaveric donor resources. The established safety record of LRD-LT made this option appealing to both physicians and parental donors.     

Acute Humoral Rejection in an ABO Compatible Combined Liver–Kidney Transplant—The Kidney Is Not Always Protected

Combined liver–kidney transplantation has become a common practice for the treatment of patients with concurrent end-stage renal disease and end-stage liver disease. Liver transplantation in the setting of multiorgan transplantation is thought to have a protective effect against humoral rejection even when a positive crossmatch is obtained prior to surgery. In most centers, a pre liver–kidney transplant crossmatch is rarely performed because of the known immunoprotective effect of the liver allograft. In this report, a case of acute humoral rejection in the kidney allograft after a combined liver–kidney transplant is described. Although humoral rejection was treated using plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab, the kidney required 3 months to recover function and finally progressed to chronic allograft nephropathy. A heightened index of suspicion for acute humoral rejection of the renal allograft is necessary when performing combined liver–kidney transplants to highly sensitized patients due to previous organ transplants.     

Outcome of kidney transplant in primary,repeat, and kidney‐after‐nonrenal solid‐organ transplantation: 15‐year analysis of recent UNOS database

The number of nonrenal solid‐organ transplants increased substantially in the last few decades. Many of these patients develop renal failure and receive kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient and kidney allograft survival in primary, repeat, and kidney‐after‐nonrenal organ transplantation using national data reported to United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) from January 2000 through December 2014. Survival time for each patient was stratified into the following: Group A (comparison group)—recipients of primary kidney transplant (178 947 patients), Group B—recipients of repeat kidney transplant (17 819 patients), and Group C—recipients of kidney transplant performed after either a liver, heart, or lung transplant (2365 patients). We compared survivals using log‐rank test. Compared to primary or repeat kidney transplant, patient and renal allograft survival was significantly lower in those with previous nonrenal organ transplant. Renal allograft and patient survival after liver, heart, or lung transplants are comparable. Death was the main cause of graft loss in patients who had prior nonrenal organ transplant.     

A case of living-donor renal transplantation for chronic renal failure caused by secondary amyloidosis

In Japan, amyloidosis is a rare cause of renal failure and of renal transplantation. We treated a patient who underwent a renal transplantation because of chronic renal failure caused by secondary amyloidosis with a good result. The patient was a 50-year-old woman who was diagnosed with secondary amyloidosis and an amyloid kidney. She underwent living donor renal transplantation after about 7 years of hemodialysis. During the 3-year posttransplantation period, she maintained good allograft function with a serum creatinine level about 1.2 mg/dL. Because of amyloidosis is a systemic disease, amyloid kidney patients often experience fatal complications, so the indications for renal transplantation in amyloid patients are still controversial. But if the patient's general condition is good, renal transplantation can be an effective therapy for patients with kidney failure caused by amyloidosis.     

Decreased survival of islet allografts in rats with advanced chronic complications of diabetes

Successful islet transplantation has been possible in experimental animals in contrast to humans. One difference between animal models of diabetes and human islet transplantation is the presence of advanced chronic complications in humans. Even longer-term follow-up of islet transplantation in humans according to the Edmonton protocol suggests that advanced chronic complications may adversely affect allograft survival with the glucocorticoid-free immunosuppressive regimen as well. We developed a rat model of chronic complications of diabetes and compared islet allograft survival in rats with advanced chronic complications to age-matched control rats with acute onset diabetes. Islets were transplanted at either the renal supcapsular, intrahepatic, or intramuscular location. The survival of islet allografts in rats with chronic complications was decreased at all sites compared with the age-matched controls. The best survival in the rats with advanced chronic complications occurred at the renal subcapsular site. Blood sugar measurements indicated impaired glucose tolerance in most of the rats with chronic complications and surviving renal subcapsular islet allograft. Histological and gross examination of the surviving renal subcapsular islet allografts indicated disordered angiogenesis in the rats with chronic complications. Rats with successful intrahepatic islet allografts and the respective age-matched controls had comparable blood sugars. Survival of islet allografts at the intramuscular site was poor in rats with chronic complications or acute onset diabetes. We conclude that the structural or metabolic abnormalities associated with chronic poor control of diabetes impair islet allograft survival and function. This should be considered as a possible explanation for failure of islet allograft survival in human islet transplantation.     

Incidence of Renal and Liver Rejection and Patient Survival Rate Following Combined Liver and Kidney Transplantation

Multiple organ transplantations are used to treat chronic multiple organ failure. However, long-term mortality and graft tolerance remain to be evaluated. We carried out a retrospective and comparative analysis of 45 patients who underwent a combined liver and kidney (LK) transplantation (LKT) from the same donor. They were compared to 86 matched patients who underwent kidney (K) transplantation (KT). All patients had an organic renal failure associated with cirrhosis (n = 35) or with inherited disease (n = 10). Nineteen (42.9%) had been transplanted previously. The patients' survival rate was 85% at 1 year and 82% at 3 years. Seven patients died within the first 3 months, due to severe polymicrobial infection. Two patients in the LK population (4.2%) developed acute rejection of the kidney graft compared to 24 of the 86 matched renal transplanted patients (32.6%). In parallel, acute liver rejection was observed in 14 cases (31.1%) in the LK population. The occurrence of acute rejection was not associated with panel-reactive lymphocytotoxic antibodies (n = 16), nor with positive cross-matches (n = 3). Four of the 45 patients (8.8%) subsequently developed chronic renal allograft rejection, and 16 cases of chronic hepatic dysfunction were noted (42.2%). In conclusion, the overall survival rate following combined liver kidney transplantation is acceptable, and LKT can be proposed to patients with kidney failure associated with liver dysfunction, primary oxaluria or amyloid neuropathy. The main cause of mortality in this population was severe infectious complications. The frequency of acute kidney rejection was lower than in single transplantation.     

Can exchange transfusions treat postoperative intrahepatic colestasis in patients with sickle cell anemia?

BACKGROUND: Although the most common cause of liver failure (LF) in hematologic patients is viral hepatitis, several episodes of sickle cell intrahepatic cholestasis (IHC) have been reported as rare but potentially causative of fulminant LF. Reviewing the literature, we have presented a single case of intrahepatic cholestasis after major liver resection, which was effectively treated by exchange transfusion. METHODS: Serial hemoglobin S, D levels and liver enzymes were monitored postoperatively. RESULTS: Although the patient's intra- and postoperative courses were uneventful, an increased serum bilirubin was identified to be due to intrahepatic sinusoid congestion and subsequent cholestasis. Exchange transfusion was required to maintain HbS below 20% and reverse bilirubin levels to normal values. CONCLUSION: Sickle cell anemia is a rare cause of cholestasis after major hepatic surgery. To our knowledge, this case is the only documented incidence of IHC following major hepatectomy that was effectively treated with exchange transfusion.     

Living‐Related Liver Transplantation for Siblings with Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis 2, with Novel Genetic Findings

Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis is a syndrome of severe cholestasis progressing to biliary cirrhosis and liver failure that develops in childhood. This report describes two siblings with PFIC‐2 who underwent living‐related liver transplantation from their genetically proven heterozygous parents. Both patients had normal gamma‐glutamyl transpeptidase levels, but showed severe pruritus with sleep disturbance, cholestasis, jaundice and growth failure. Genetic testing of each patient revealed two missense mutations of the bile salt export pump, S901R and C1083Y, which have not previously been associated with PFIC‐2. Usual medical treatment failed to improve their clinical symptoms, and the two siblings underwent living‐related liver transplantation from their heterozygous parents. The transplants improved their clinical symptoms significantly, and the patients have since shown age‐appropriate growth. Electron microscopic findings of the explanted liver of the younger sister revealed dense and amorphous bile, which is characteristic of PFIC‐2. In the cases presented here, living‐related liver transplantation from a heterozygous donor was associated with better quality of life and improvement of growth, and thus appears to be a feasible option for PFIC‐2 patients. Mutation analysis is a useful tool to help decide the course of treatment of PFIC.     

Kidney transplantation for end-stage renal failure in liver transplant recipients with hepatitis C viral infection

BACKGROUND: End-stage renal failure after successful liver transplantation (LTx) has been described in up to 5% of patients. Kidney transplantation (KTx) has been the treatment of choice in these cases. However, in recipients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV), the augmentation of immunosuppression after KTx may result in an increased viral load. This, in turn, may adversely affect the liver allograft. METHOD: The present study retrospectively examined the outcome in 17 patients (3 females and 14 males, mean age 51.1+/-11.3 years) who received KTx after LTx. The mean interval from LTx to KTx was 57.6+/-32.1 months. The mean follow-up was 41.7+/-20.5 months after KTx, and 99.6+/-37.7 months after LTx. Sixteen of the 17 patients received tacrolimus-based immunosuppression at the time of KTx. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, one patient underwent combined liver and kidney retransplantation 3.7 years after KTx and 12.7 years after LTx. She subsequently died secondary to primary nonfunction. Four other patients died, two of lung cancer, one of pancreatitis/sepsis, and one of severe depression leading to noncompliance. A total of 29 episodes of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection (1.7 episodes/ patient) were encountered and treated with steroids. Seven patients experienced a rise in liver function tests during the period of increased steroid dosage. Four patients received no treatment, and their liver function returned to baseline. The remaining three were treated with interferon. Overall 1- and 3-year actuarial patient and liver allograft survival was 88% and 71% (after renal transplantation); corresponding 1- and 3-year actuarial graft survival was 88% and 61%. Twelve patients are alive with normal liver function. One patient is on dialysis, because of renal allograft loss to noncompliance. CONCLUSION: In this series, LTx recipients with HCV infection were able to undergo KTx with a reasonable degree of success. KTx should be offered for end-stage renal failure after LTx, even in the presence of HCV infection, to individuals with stable liver function and no signs of liver failure.     

肝或肾移植术后受者再次行一期肝肾联合移植三例报告

目的 探讨肝或肾移植术后受者再次行一期肝肾联合移植的手术适应证、术后并发症及存活情况.方法 对2003年10月至2008年12月施行的3例肝或肾移植术后再次行一期肝肾联合移植的受者进行随访,并进行文献复习.对其围手术期死亡率、术后并发症及存活情况进行总结.结果 围手术期死亡率为33.3%(1/3).术后并发症:1例因腹腔出血术后第29天死于肺部感染、急性移植肾功能衰竭和多器官功能衰竭;3例患者均发生了肺部感染;无急性排斥反应发生.2例存活患者,从首次移植计算,已经分别存活56个月和228个月;从一期肝肾联合移植计算,已经分别存活40个月和48个月.结论 肝肾联合移植是治疗终末期肝肾疾病的有效方法.肝或肾移植术后受者再次行一期肝肾联合移植是可行的.     

Late-onset cytomegalovirus-associated interstitial nephritis in a kidney transplant

Cytomegalovirus is the most important viral infection in kidney transplants, but rarely affects the allograft after the sixth month posttransplantation. We present a patient who developed renal failure eighteen months posttransplant; a kidney biopsy showed cytomegalovirus inclusions, acute tubular necrosis and mild interstitial nephritis. After intravenous ganciclovir, renal function transiently improved. Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigen was weekly reported as negative. One month later another biopsy was performed due to renal failure. The findings were consistent with tubular atrophy and severe interstitial nephritis. No cytomegalovirus cellular inclusions were found on histology, including immunohistochemical and polymerase chain reaction studies; pp65 antigen studies were persistently negative. Despite an attempt to recover renal function with steroid therapy, the patient restarted hemodialysis 20 months posttransplantation. This report suggests that cytomegalovirus should be considered as a late cause of kidney failure even in the absence of infection-related symptoms. The irreversible allograft damage can be caused despite the successful eradication of the virus with intravenous ganciclovir.     

Protocol biopsies after kidney transplantation

Numerous studies have investigated features of allograft injury in renal biopsies obtained in stable kidney transplants. Evaluation of protocol biopsies has revealed a considerably high prevalence of subclinical acute rejection (SAR) and chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN) already in early phases after transplantation. The meanwhile well-established association of SAR and CAN in protocol biopsy with long-term allograft failure and the finding of superior allograft outcome after treatment of SAR in a randomized prospective study may point to clinical relevance of this procedure. In this review, potential benefits and risks associated with kidney allograft biopsy in stable renal transplant recipients are discussed.     

Recurrent sickle cell nephropathy in a transplanted kidney

Of patients who developed end-stage renal disease secondary to sickle cell anemia (SCA), some have undergone renal transplantation with reasonable success. We recently cared for a patient with SCA and a functioning, transplanted kidney who experienced a permanent decline in renal function three and one-half years following transplant. The evaluation of his renal dysfunction revealed multiple features to support recurrence of sickle cell nephropathy as the cause for the deterioration.     

Renal transplantation following previous heart, liver, and lung transplantation: an 8-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Long-term follow-up of heart, liver, and lung transplantation has led to an increased recognition of secondary end-stage renal failure (ESRF) in transplant recipients. This study examines our center's experience with renal transplantation following previous solid organ transplantation. METHODS: From January 1, 1992, to September 30, 1999, our center performed 18 renal transplants in previous solid organ recipients. During the same period, 815 total renal transplants were performed. One- and 3-year graft and patient survival, recipient demographics, donor type, and reason for transplantation were compared between these groups. RESULTS: Of the 18 recipients, 7 had prior heart transplants, 4 had prior liver transplants, and 7 had prior lung transplants. Cyclosporine toxicity contributed to renal failure in 17 (94.4%) of the patients-either as a sole factor (11 patients) or in combination with hypertension, renal artery stenosis, or tacrolimus toxicity (6 patients). Kaplan-Meier 1- and 3-year patient survival was 82.9% and 73.7%, compared with 95.5% and 90.7% in all renal transplant recipients. No surviving patient has suffered renal allograft loss. Mean current creatinine level is 1.4 mg/dL. CONCLUSIONS: Renal transplantation is an excellent therapy for ESRF following prior solid organ transplantation. One and 3-year patient and graft survival demonstrate the utility of renal transplantation in this patient population.