Comparative evaluation of various prostate specific antigen ratios for the early detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of various ratios using total prostate specific antigen (PSA), complexed PSA (cPSA) and free PSA (fPSA) in the early detection of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 535 consecutive patients evaluated at a prostate cancer detection clinic between January 1998 and October 1999. Patients had blood samples drawn before transrectal ultrasonography and prostate biopsy to measure PSA, cPSA and fPSA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (sensitivity vs 1 - specificity) were used to evaluate the performance of PSA, cPSA, f/tPSA, cPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA, tPSA/prostate volume (PV), fPSA/PV, and cPSA/PV. The areas under the curve (AUC) were calculated for each ratio. The performance of each ratio over all patients or in those with a tPSA of 4-6 or 4-10 ng/mL were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 535 patients, 204 (38%) had biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer. The AUC obtained with tPSA alone was 0.64; when measured for all patients the cPSA/PV (0.78), PSA/PV (0.77), f/tPSA (0.76) and fPSA/cPSA (0.75) performed better than tPSA alone. Furthermore, in patients with a tPSA of 4-10 ng/mL, tPSA/PV (0.72), cPSA/PV (0.71), f/tPSA (0.69), fPSA/cPSA (0.69) and cPSA/tPSA (0.62) performed better than tPSA alone (0.52). Finally, in patients with a tPSA of 4-6 ng/mL, PSA/PV and cPSA/PV performed better than the other ratios. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PSA ratios gives a higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting prostate cancer than the use of tPSA alone.     

Comparisons of the various combinations of free, complexed, and total prostate-specific antigen for the detection of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVES: We compared the ability of three prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratios - free-to- total PSA ratio (fPSA/tPSA), free-to-complexed PSA ratio (fPSA/cPSA), and complexed-to-total PSA ratio (cPSA/tPSA) - to distinguish prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: We tested 258 consecutive patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate needle biopsy because of an abnormal digital rectal examination or a Tandem-R PSA of >4.1 ng/ml. Free PSA (fPSA) and total PSA (tPSA) were measured by Tandem-R assay. alpha(1)-Antichymotrypsin-complexed PSA (cPSA) was measured by Markit-M PSA-ACT assay. RESULTS: Of the 258 patients, 204 had BPH, and 54 had prostate cancer. The specificity at 96% sensitivity for fPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA, and cPSA/tPSA was 23, 25, and 33%, respectively. Of 162 patients with tPSA between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml, 132 had BPH and 30 had prostate cancer. The specificity at 96% sensitivity for f/tPSA, f/cPSA and c/tPSA was 32, 44, and 41%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves among fPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA, and cPSA/tPSA in the overall PSA range or in tPSA between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: fPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA, and cPSA/tPSA did not differ in their ability to distinguish prostate cancer from BPH.     

Predictors of prostate cancer on repeat prostatic biopsy in men with serum total prostate-specific antigen between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL

OBJECTIVES: We determine whether the different molecular forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and other PSA variables can predict prostate cancer in men undergoing repeat prostate needle biopsy. METHODS: Between 1997 and 2001, repeat biopsy was performed in 97 patients who had undergone prior negative prostate biopsy. The ability of total PSA (tPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), free PSA (fPSA), free-to-total PSA (fPSA/tPSA), free-to-complexed PSA (fPSA/cPSA), complexed-to-total PSA (cPSA/tPSA), tPSA density (tPSAD), cPSA density (cPSAD), transition zone tPSA density (tPSATZ) and transition zone cPSA density (cPSATZ) was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyzes as well as receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Prostate cancer on repeat biopsy was detected in 24% of subjects (23 of 97) who had a negative initial biopsy. The PSA parameters cut-off to ensure a 96% sensitivity of cancer detection, were 29% using fPSA/tPSA, 32% using fPSA/cPSA, 0.18 ng/mL/cc using tPSATZ and 0.16 ng/mL/cc using cPSATZ. The fPSA/tPSA would have prevented 32% of negative biopsies, the fPSA/cPSA 28%, the tPSATZ 23% and the cPSATZ 30%. ROC curve analysis fPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA ratios, tPSATZ and cPSATZ were significantly better predictors of repeat biopsy results than tPSA or cPSA, but there was no significant difference in the ROC curves among these four PSA parameters. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis these four PSA parameters were significant predictors for cancer detection in the repeat biopsy group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: fPSA/tPSA ratio, fPSA/cPSA ratio, tPSATZ and cPSATZ enhance the specificity of PSA testing compared to tPSA or cPSA when determining which patients should undergo repeat biopsy.     

Contemporary use of complexed PSA and calculated percent free PSA for early detection of prostate cancer: impact of changing disease demographics

Objectives. To assess the diagnostic performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA), total PSA (tPSA), and calculated free/total PSA (f/t PSA) ratios in the differentiation of benign disease from prostate cancer (CaP) using a contemporary patient cohort.Methods. The cPSA, tPSA, and calculated fPSA values were determined using the Bayer Immuno-1 system. To validate our calculated f/t PSA ratio, we also retrospectively measured fPSA using the Abbott AxSYM immunoassay system in archival pretreatment sera obtained between 1990 and 1997 from 362 men with clinically and biopsy-confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (n = 179) or CaP (n = 183). The diagnostic utility of tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was assessed using a contemporary test population consisting of sera prospectively collected between June 1999 and June 2000 from 3006 men who had recently undergone a systematic biopsy by urologists in clinical practices throughout the United States. This contemporary patient sample had biopsy diagnoses of either no evidence of malignancy (n = 1857) or CaP (n = 1149). All serum samples had tPSA values between 2.0 and 20.0 ng/mL.Results. The measured versus calculated f/t PSA ratios had a Pearson’s correlation coefficient of 0.9130 in the retrospectively studied population of 362 men. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUCs) for the measured and calculated f/t PSA ratios were indistinguishable (69.6% versus 69.2%, respectively). In the contemporary population (n = 3006), the ROC-AUC for tPSA, cPSA, and the calculated f/t PSA ratio was 52.2%, 53.9%, and 58.4%, respectively. We also compared the diagnostic performance using published cutoffs for tPSA (greater than 4.0 ng/mL), cPSA (greater than 3.8 ng/mL), and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 15% and greater than 25%) in tPSA reflex ranges of 2 to 20 ng/mL and 2 to 10 ng/mL. We found that both cPSA and the f/t PSA ratio (greater than 25% cutoff) outperformed tPSA and yielded similar results in terms of biopsies spared and cancers missed.Conclusions. The calculated f/t PSA ratio and cPSA perform equally well in terms of the improvement of specificity in the discrimination of benign disease and CaP. The f/t PSA ratio and cPSA provide clinical benefits over the use of tPSA alone, such as an increased sparing of unnecessary biopsies performed with a manageable degree of risk of delayed cancer detection.     

PSA-related markers in the detection of prostate cancer and high-grade disease in the contemporary era with extended biopsy

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relationship of total PSA (tPSA), percent free PSA (%fPSA), and complexed PSA (cPSA) with prostate cancer detection and the diagnosis of poorly-differentiated cancers in the contemporary era. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathological records of 292 men who met the following inclusion criteria: (1) tPSA 2.5 to 10 ng/ml; (2) initial biopsy only; (3) extended biopsy scheme (>or=10 peripheral zone cores); (4) no previous prostate surgeries. The ability of PSA-related markers to detect cancer was determined by area under the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis (AUC-ROC). Various clinically relevant % fPSA cutoffs and cPSA ranges were analyzed to determine the association with poorly-differentiated cancers. RESULTS: Cancer was detected in 126 (43%) men, with mean Gleason score of 7. The cancer detection rates for various cutoffs of tPSA, cPSA and % fPSA were very similar. On ROC analysis for cancer diagnosis, the AUCs for tPSA, % fPSA, and cPSA were 0.53, 0.54, and 0.52, respectively. Men with % fPSA <15 were more likely to have poorly-differentiated cancer than those with % fPSA >or=15 (66% vs. 41%, P < 0.005). Similarly, cPSA ranges (2-4, 4.1-6, and >6) were associated with the detection of poorly-differentiated cancers (37%, 57%, and 80% P < 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: With the use of extended prostate sampling in the contemporary screening population, the addition of cPSA and % fPSA does not enhance the diagnostic performance of tPSA. However, the significant association between cPSA and poorly-differentiated cancers suggests that this may be a more useful initial test for prostate cancer screening.     

Complexed prostate specific antigen density is better than the other PSA derivatives for detection of prostate cancer in men with total PSA between 2.5 and 20 ng/ml: results of a prospective multicenter study

PURPOSE: This prospective, multicenter study was initiated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PSA, free/total PSA (f/tPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) with volume-based parameters for early detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA between 2.5 and 20 ng/ml. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 408 subjects with serum PSA values between 2.5 and 20 ng/ml regardless of digital rectal examination (DRE) were included in to the study. The diagnostic validity, sensitivity, specificity and cut-off values were evaluated by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Of 408 patients 77 (18.9%) were positive for prostate cancer. Digital rectal examination was non-suspicious in 86% (351/408) of the patients. Area under curve (AUC) values for cPSA were better than PSA and f/tPSA in patients with PSA values of 2.5-10 ng/ml and 4-10 ng/ml, as well as the whole group. Furthermore, on ROC curve analysis cPSAD was the best predictor of prostate cancer for all PSA ranges regardless of the DRE findings except PSA values between 2.5 and 4 ng/ml. The cut-off value of cPSAD at 90% sensitivity was 0.06 ng/ml/cm(3) with a 35.3% specificity saving 126 unnecessary biopsies in the whole group. CONCLUSION: cPSA might be a better initial test than PSA for prostate cancer detection and measurement of cPSA alone and its derivatives obviate the need for additional fPSA testing.     

Complexed prostate specific antigen (PSA) reduces unnecessary prostate biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/mL range of total PSA

OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) to total PSA (tPSA) and percentage free PSA (f/tPSA) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer for the tPSA range 2.6-4.0 ng/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive men scheduled for prostate biopsy were enrolled prospectively at 14 different sites in two multicentre studies in Europe and the USA. Serum obtained before biopsy was tested with the ACS:180 and Immuno 1 tPSA and cPSA assays (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, NY, USA) and the Access fPSA and tPSA assays (Beckman, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves were generated to compare the diagnostic performance of tPSA, cPSA and f/tPSA. RESULTS: Of 316 men with a tPSA of 2.6-4.0 ng/mL, 82 (26%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer on biopsy. ROC analysis of all 316 men showed an area under the curve (AUC) for cPSA of 0.63, significantly greater than the AUC for tPSA of 0.56 (P = 0.008). At a sensitivity of 95%, threshold values of 2.3 ng/mL for cPSA and 2.73 ng/mL for tPSA provided specificities of 20.1% and 9.8%, respectively. f/tPSA was only available for 205 of the 316 (65%) men and the AUC for cPSA was 0.63, and did not significantly differ from the f/tPSA AUC of 0.64 (P = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS: As a single test, cPSA provides improved specificity over tPSA and comparable specificity to f/tPSA for detecting prostate cancer, and may reduce the number of unnecessary prostate biopsies in the 2.6-4.0 ng/mL tPSA range.     

Comparison of two investigative assays for the complexed prostate-specific antigen in total prostate-specific antigen between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/mL

OBJECTIVES: To determine the ability of complexed prostate-specific antigen (cPSA) levels to diagnose prostate cancer. METHODS: Between September 1998 and March 1999, cPSA levels in 182 consecutive patients with an abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE) or a total PSA (tPSA; Tandem-R assay) level greater than 4.1 ng/mL were examined. Levels of cPSA were measured by the Markit-M PSA-ACT (alpha(1)-antichymotrypsin) assay (cPSA-MM) and Bayer Immuno 1 complexed PSA assay (cPSA-BI). Free PSA (fPSA) was measured by the Tandem-R free PSA assay. RESULTS: Of the 140 patients with tPSA between 4.1 and 10.0 ng/mL, 116 were histologically confirmed as having benign tissue; the remaining 24 were diagnosed with prostate cancer. To ensure a 92% sensitivity of cancer detection, a cutoff value for the tPSA, cPSA-MM, and cPSA-BI assays of 4.8 ng/mL, 2.7 ng/mL, and 4.6 ng/mL, respectively, was determined. The percentage of negative biopsies prevented at these cutoff (ie, specificity) values was 14%, 23%, and 24%. No significant differences among these three assays were found. At 92% sensitivity, the cutoff value for the fPSA/tPSA, fPSA/cPSA-MM, and fPSA/cPSA-BI ratios was 18%, 27%, and 18%, respectively. The specificity was 35%, 49%, and 51%. No significant differences were found among these three fPSA ratios. Significant differences were noted between tPSA and the fPSA/cPSA-MM ratio and between tPSA and the fPSA/cPSA-BI ratio. No differences were seen among the other PSA parameters. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in the ability of cPSA levels to distinguish prostate cancer and noncancer was observed between cPSA-MM and cPSA-BI or between their fPSA ratios. Only the fPSA/cPSA-MM and fPSA/cPSA-BI ratios provided significantly enhanced diagnostic performance compared with tPSA.     

Use of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) isoforms for the detection of prostate cancer in men with a PSA level of 2-10 ng/ml: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE: Measurement of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for the detection of prostate cancer has poor specificity in men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/ml. It has been suggested that measurement of the ratio of free to total PSA (f/tPSA) or complexed PSA (cPSA) might offer an improvement. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these tests among men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/ml. METHODS: Data on sensitivity and specificity were extracted from 66 eligible studies. Likelihood ratios and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were estimated and possible sources of heterogeneity between studies examined. RESULTS: Use of the f/tPSA or the cPSA test improved diagnostic performance among men with a total PSA (tPSA) of 2-4 or 4-10 ng/ml compared to tPSA alone. The diagnostic performance of the f/tPSA test was significantly higher in the tPSA range of 4-10 ng/ml compared to a tPSA range of 2-4 ng/ml (p < 0.01); at a sensitivity of 95%, the specificity was 18% in the 4-10 ng/ml tPSA range and 6% in the 2-4 ng/ml tPSA range. Among studies that measured both isoforms, the diagnostic performance of the f/tPSA test and the cPSA was equivalent in both PSA ranges. CONCLUSIONS: The use of the f/tPSA or cPSA test among men with PSA levels between 2 and 10 ng/ml can reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies whilst maintaining a high cancer detection rate.     

Utilidad del cociente psa-l/psa-t y la dpsa para la discriminación entre hipertrofia benigna de próstata y cáncer de próstata

objectiveTo investigate the clinical significance of the free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio (f/tPSA) and PSA density (PSAD) for prostate cancer detection in patients with intermediate tPSA levels (4-10 ng/ml). To establish a cutoff to discriminate between benign prostatic disease (BPH) and prostate cancer (CaP), avoiding unnecessary biopsiesMethodsThis prospective study included 136 men, aged between 54 and 85 (mean 70,6) years old. Urinary tract symptoms were present in these patients. Serum samples were obtained to measure tPSA, fPSA, and f/tPSA; digital rectal examination and transrectal ultrasound eight-sector biopsies were performed. Prostate volume was measured and PSAD calculated. The pathologic study, carried out in 113 patients, showed 82 with BPH and 31 with prostate cancer in various stagesResultsThere were no significant differences between patients with BPH and CaP when comparing tPSA, fPSA, f/tPSA or digital rectal examination. PSAD and prostate volume were significantly different in patients with BPH and CaP. With a sensitivity of 94% (78,5-99), the f/tPSA cutoff was 0,28 with a 11% (5,2-19,8) specificity. With a sensitivity of 96,2% (80,3-99,4) cutoff for PSAD was 0,109 and specificity 25% (15,5-36,6)ConclusionsIn patients whose tPSA level is between 4 and 10 ng/ml, f/tPSA has no advantages over tPSA measurement for early detection of prostate cancer. DPSA can improve specificities, without compromising the detection of CaP     

Probability of prostate cancer detection based on results of a multicenter study using the AxSYM free PSA and total PSA assays

OBJECTIVES: The determination of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen (%fPSA) enhances the specificity of prostate cancer (CaP) detection. This study was undertaken to assess the performance of %fPSA in differentiating benign prostate disease from CaP and to determine the CaP probability estimates using the AxSYM Free PSA and AxSYM Total PSA assays. METHODS: In this prospective study, 297 men, 50 years old or older, with a total PSA level between 4 and 10 ng/mL and a nonsuspicious digital rectal examination were enrolled at 10 clinical sites. All subjects underwent at least sextant prostate biopsies to establish the diagnosis. fPSA and total PSA (tPSA) levels were determined using the AxSYM Free PSA and AxSYM Total PSA assays. Percent fPSA values were compared with tPSA values to determine the appropriate cutoffs for prostate biopsy and to calculate the CaP probability estimates. RESULTS: The strongest predictor of CaP in a logistic regression model was %fPSA (odds ratio 2.29), which contributed significantly more than age or tPSA to the predictive model. In this study population, a %fPSA cutoff of 26.4% would have detected 96% of subjects with CaP (sensitivity) and would have eliminated 27.4% of unnecessary biopsies (specificity). CaP probability estimates ranged from 9% to 69% and increased as the %fPSA value decreased. Men with a %fPSA level of 10% or lower had a 69% probability of CaP, and men with a %fPSA level of greater than 26% had a 9% probability of CaP. CONCLUSIONS: Percent fPSA values can help differentiate CaP from benign prostate disease and reduce unnecessary biopsies in 27% of men 50 years old or older whose digital rectal examination was normal and whose tPSA level was between 4 and 10 ng/mL. A %fPSA result can assist the physician and patient in determining the probability of CaP and assessing the need for prostate biopsy.     

The significance of the free-to-complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio in prostate cancer detection in patients with a PSA level of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ratio of free prostate specific antigen (fPSA), total PSA (tPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA, measured using a novel immunoassay) with other variables used to detect prostate cancer in patients with intermediate serum PSA levels of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 1997 to August 1998, 140 consecutive patients were assessed; all had intermediate serum PSA levels and/or abnormal findings on a digital rectal examination. All patients underwent transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy, and the prostate and transition zone volumes were determined by TRUS. Free and tPSA were measured using the Tandem-R assay (Hybritech Corp., San Diego, CA). PSA complexed with alpha1-antichymotrypsin (cPSA) was measured using an appropriate assay. The ability of cPSA, free-to-total PSA ratio (f/tPSA), free-to-complexed PSA ratio (f/cPSA), tPSA density of the whole prostate (PSAD), of the transition zone (tPSATZ), and cPSA density of the whole prostate (cPSAD) and of the transition zone (cPSATZ) to improve the power of PSA in detecting prostate cancer was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results Of the 140 patients, 126 had histologically confirmed benign disease and 14 had prostate cancer. The cPSA alone had better specificity for detecting prostate cancer than had tPSA alone but the difference was not significant. The area under the ROC curve for f/cPSA was larger than those for all other variables. With a 93% sensitivity for detecting prostate cancer, a f/cPSA threshold of 25% would result in fewer unnecessary biopsies (40% f/cPSA specificity) than with all other PSA variables. The difference in the resolution was significant between f/cPSA and tPSA, cPSA, tPSAD and tPSATZ, but not with f/tPSA, cPSAD or cPSATZ. In patients with a prostate volume of < 30 mL, the cPSATZ showed better specificity for prostate cancer than tPSA alone. CONCLUSION: Measuring the level of cPSA and its derivatives may provide better differentiation of prostate cancer and benign disease than tPSA alone in patients with a tPSA level of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL.     

Use of various combinations of free, complexed and total prostate-specific antigen levels as predictors of the pathologic stage of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of various combinations of total, free and complexed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were assessed to predict the pathologic stage of prostate cancer. METHODS: Total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA) levels were measured preoperatively in 52 patients with clinical localized prostate cancer who had undergone radical prostatectomy. Pathologic stages were classified as: organ-confined (n = 27); capsular penetration (n = 14); seminal vesicle involvement (n = 8); involvement of the surgical margins (n = 10); and lymph node involvement (n = 3). RESULTS: The fPSA/tPSA and fPSA/cPSA ratios significantly differed between patients with organ-confined disease and non-organ-confined disease (P = 0.035, P = 0.033, respectively) and between those with favorable versus unfavorable pathology (P = 0.001, P = 0.014, respectively), but tPSA, cPSA, fPSA and the cPSA/tPSA ratio did not. Using a fPSA/tPSA cutoff level of 11%, the prediction of organ-confined disease would increase from 52 to 67% and the rate of predicting favorable pathology would increase from 42 to 62%. A fPSA/cPSA cutoff level of 12% would increase the rate of predicting organ-confined disease to 79% and the rate of predicting favorable pathology would increase to 69%. The positive predictive value of the fPSA/cPSA ratio was higher than that of the fPSA/tPSA ratio, although the receiver operating characteristic curve of the fPSA/cPSA ratio was not different from that of the fPSA/tPSA ratio. CONCLUSION: Although there was no predictive difference found between fPSA/tPSA and fPSA/cPSA ratio, both ratios may help predict the pathologic stage of prostate cancer.     

Percent-free prostate specific antigen is elevated in men on haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis treatment.

BACKGROUND: Men with chronic renal failure evaluated for transplantation are often tested for prostate specific antigen (PSA) to detect prostate cancer. PSA occurs in several different molecular forms in serum: free PSA (fPSA) and complexed PSA (cPSA), the sum of which corresponds to total PSA (tPSA). In addition to tPSA, percent fPSA to tPSA (%fPSA) is widely used to enhance discrimination of benign disorders from prostate cancer. The low molecular mass of fPSA suggests elimination by renal glomerular filtration and that renal failure may significantly influence %fPSA. We evaluated whether established reference levels for %fPSA are applicable also to patients treated with haemodialysis or continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD). METHODS: The study included 20 men on intermittent haemodialysis with low-flux membranes and 25 men on CAPD, without known history of prostate cancer. The control group included 3129 men without known prostate cancer. We analysed fPSA and tPSA in serum by dual-label immunofluorometric assays, from which we calculated %fPSA and cPSA. Serum levels of different PSA forms were adjusted for age and presented as geometric means. RESULTS :Percent fPSA was significantly higher in patients on either haemodialysis (39.5%) or CAPD (39.6%) compared with controls (28.1%). Haemodialysis patients, but not CAPD patients, had significantly higher mean levels of fPSA. Levels of tPSA and cPSA for haemodialysis or CAPD patients did not differ significantly compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: Recommended reference ranges for %fPSA, based on men with normal renal function, do not apply to uraemic men on dialysis. In these men, a high %fPSA should not be considered as a sign of benign disease. This is clinically important in the evaluation of dialysis patients for transplantation, as %fPSA is often used as a tool for detection of prostate cancer.     

Early detection of prostate cancer in African-American men through use of multiple biomarkers: human kallikrein 2 (hK2), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), and free PSA (fPSA)

Recent studies have reported enhanced prostate cancer detection in Caucasians with serum human glandular kallikrein 2 (hK2) in combination with total- (tPSA) and free-prostate-specific antigen (fPSA). The purpose of this study is to validate these findings in an African-American patient cohort. A total of 137 African-American men were found by routine screening to have tPSA levels above 2.5 ng/ml or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Sera were drawn prior to biopsy of the prostate and Hybritech PSA, FPSA and hK2 (for research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures) concentrations were determined on Beckman Coulter's Access immunoanalyzer. These independent variables and the ratios of percent fPSA (%fPSA), hK2/tPSA, hK2/fPSA, and hK2*tPSA/fPSA were compared between cancer and non-cancer groups. In all, 49 of 137 men had prostate cancer. hK2 and its calculated ratios outperformed tPSA on receiver operator characteristic (ROC) analysis, but %fPSA had statistically the highest area under the curve (AUC) at 0.801. When restricting the analysis to only the tPSA range of 4.0-10 ng/ml, hK2/fPSA yielded the highest AUC (0.721). The ratio of hK2/fPSA was also found to increase the positive predictive value (PPV) of the %fPSA ranges less than 10 and 10-25%. %fPSA offered the best performance and highest specificity in prostate cancer detection in African-American males over the entire range of tPSA. hK2/fPSA may offer modest improvement in the tPSA range of 4.0-10 ng/ml. Furthermore, hK2/fPSA can enhance the PPV of low %fPSA values. Therefore, the use of multiple biomarkers may ultimately increase the specificity of prostate cancer screening in African-American men.     

Comparison of the clinical validity of free prostate-specific antigen, alpha-1 antichymotrypsin-bound prostate-specific antigen and complexed prostate-specific antigen in prostate cancer diagnosis

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic utility of free prostate specific antigen (fPSA), alpha-1- antichymotrypsin-bound PSA (PSA-ACT), complexed PSA (cPSA), and including their associated ratios to total PSA (tPSA) in serum for discrimination between prostate cancer (PCa) and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: A total of 166 white men (age: 65-88 years) with a tPSA between 2 and 20 microg/l were retrospectively analysed. Serum concentrations of tPSA, fPSA, PSA-ACT and cPSA were measured in 118 untreated PCa patients and 48 patients with BPH. The tPSA and cPSA concentrations were measured with the Bayer Immuno 1 system (Bayer Diagnostics, Tarrytown, USA). The Elecsys system 2010 (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) was used for determination of tPSA and fPSA. The PSA-ACT assay is a newly, developed prototype assay on the ES system (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). RESULTS: For statistical analysis only patients with tPSA between 2 and 20 microg/l were enrolled. The median concentrations of tPSA (Bayer: PCa 7.36 microg/l, BPH 4.03 microg/l; Roche: PCa 7.75, BPH 4.13), PSA-ACT (PCa 6.98, BPH 3.18) and cPSA (PCa 6.46, BPH 3.20) were significantly different. The median ratios of fPSA/tPSA (PCa 12.8 vs. BPH 22.4%), PSA-ACT/tPSA (PCa 89.8 vs. BPH 76.1%) and cPSA/tPSA (PCa 90.5 vs. BPH 81.7%) were significantly different between PCa and BPH patients. Using the areas under the curves, receiver operating characteristics analysis (tPSA: 2-20 microg/l) for discrimination between PCa and BPH showed that the ratios fPSA/tPSA (area under the curve: 0.77), PSA-ACT/tPSA (0.72) and cPSA/tPSA (0.78) were significantly different from tPSA (Bayer: 0.53; Roche: 0.55). PSA-ACT (0.64) and cPSA (0.59) alone were not significantly different from tPSA. The calculated ratios fPSA/tPSA, PSA-ACT/tPSA and cPSA/tPSA were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: The determination of PSA-ACT or cPSA and the associated ratios do not improve the diagnostic impact to discriminate between PCa and BPH compared to fPSA/tPSA ratio. The ratios PSA-ACT/tPSA or cPSA/tPSA can be considered to be alternative tools of fPSA/tPSA.     

Derivatives of prostate‐specific antigen as predictors of incidental prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To search for an optimal derivative of prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) identifying patients at risk of incidental prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In all, 693 patients who underwent transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) with a normal digital rectal examination, no history of prostate cancer and a PSA level of 2.5–10 ng/mL were studied. The total PSA (tPSA), percentage of free/total PSA (%fPSA), complexed PSA (cPSA), PSA density, cPSA density and the ratio of fPSA to cPSA were measured. Specificity, sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values were determined for all possible threshold values indicating the risk of incidental prostate cancer (T1a or T1b). Furthermore, the patients were subdivided according to age and the presence of an indwelling transurethral catheter. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) were compared.

RESULTS

In the whole sample, the %fPSA was the best test predicting all incidental prostate cancers (AUC 0.618, reference: tPSA 0.494), whereas cPSA density was the best predictor of T1b disease (AUC 0.720, reference: tPSA 0.548). Stratification by age did not meaningfully alter the results, the presence of a transurethral catheter, however, was associated with a superiority of tests based on fPSA (AUC 0.620–0.670) compared with tests based on tPSA or cPSA (AUC 0.421–0.581).

CONCLUSION

Replacing tPSA by PSA derivatives (%fPSA or cPSA density) and stratifying by the presence of an indwelling transurethral catheter may improve the prediction of the risk of incidental prostate cancer and spare unnecessary biopsies before TURP in the tPSA range 2.5–10 ng/mL.     

Can complexed prostate specific antigen enhance prostate cancer detection in Japanese men?

BACKGROUNDS: The aim of this study is to ascertain whether Bayer complexed PSA (cPSA) and volume referenced cPSA could enhance the detection of prostate cancer in Japanese men. METHODS: A total of 214 Japanese men whose serum total PSA (tPSA) values ranged from 1.2 ng/ml to 4600 ng/ml were enrolled from two institutions. Serum samples for tPSA, free PSA, PSA-alpha-1-antichymotripsin (PSA-ACT) and cPSA (ADVIA-Centaur) were obtained in all cases. In addition, total gland (TGV) as well as transition zone volume (TZV) were determined in all cases who underwent untrasound guided prostate biopsy (sextant and two additional transition zone biopsies). Biopsy outcome was correlated to the following parameters: tPSA, cPSA, PSA-ACT, free to total (F/T) PSA ratio, 2 complex to total (C/T) PSA ratios and 6 volume referenced parameters. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was detected in 85 of 214 patients (40%). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in non-volume referenced variables was highest for cPSA (0.736), followed by PSA-ACT (0.735), tPSA (0.722), F/T PSA ratio (0.613) and C/T PSA ratio (0.591). Comparing tPSA with the cutoff value of 4.0 ng/ml, the cutoff value with a 2.8 ng/ml of cPSA detected one more positive biopsy patient, decreasing one more cancer missed case and 8 more false positive cases. At sensitivities of 85% to 95% in men with tPSA between 4.00 and 10.00 ng/ml (n = 116), there were no significant differences in the corresponding specificities between tPSA and cPSA, or between cPSA and PSA-ACT. At sensitivities of 90% to 95%, the corresponding specificities of PSA-ACT adjusted for transition zone volume revealed best performance. As for the performance in men with a tPSA less than 4.0 ng/ml, the specificities of cPSA performed best, and differed significantly from PSA-ACT and F/T PSA at sensitivities of 80% to 90%. CONCLUSION: Bayer cPSA could replace the first screening test by total PSA and can enhance cancer detection, compared with PSA-ACT. However, cPSA did not provide additional value in differentiating cancer from non-cancer cases in men with a tPSA between 4.00 and 10.00 ng/ml.     

Prostate specific antigen isoforms and human glandular kallikrein 2--which offers the best screening performance in a predominantly black population?

PURPOSE: Free prostate specific antigen, complexed PSA and human glandular kallikrein 2 have independently been tested against the gold standard of total PSA for prostate cancer screening in largely white populations. With the incidence of prostate cancer much higher in black men, we sought to evaluate these markers simultaneously in a predominantly black population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 138 men, of whom 108 were black, underwent ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate for tPSA levels greater than 2.5 ng/ml or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Sera were drawn before biopsy and analyzed for tPSA, fPSA, cPSA and hK2 concentrations using standard methods (hK2 assay is for research use only, not for use in diagnostic procedures). The areas under the receiver operator characteristic curves were determined for each marker as well as biomarker combinations. Additionally, each parameter's specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and theoretical screening efficiency were assessed at or above the 95% sensitivity level. RESULTS: A total of 43 (31.1%) men had prostate cancer by biopsy. While the AUC for %fPSA was statistically the highest (0.822, p <0.001), cPSA offered the highest specificity (31.6%) and positive predictive power (31.7%) of any of the tested biomarkers at comparable sensitivity (greater than 95%). The calculated efficiency of cPSA (51.4%) was also higher than the other markers. Nearly 20% of biopsies would be avoided using cPSA vs standard tPSA screening methods. CONCLUSIONS: Comparing the major PSA isoforms and hK2, cPSA alone appears to offer superior diagnostic discrimination for cancer detection in a predominantly black population.