Synchronous Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Lymph Node Involvement Predicts Poor Outcome

To evaluate the value of lymph node status of primary tumors in predicting the prognosis of synchronous resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).The characteristics of resectable mCRC are substantially different from other cancers, and the prognostic factors of resectable mCRC are still controversial.The data of 2007 patients with mCRC who received resection of the primary tumors and metastatic lesions synchronously were reviewed from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Result database. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate the capacity of different prognostic factors. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between the lymph node status and other factors. The mRNA profiles of primary resectable mCRC tumors were obtained by microarray at our center.The median survival times were 50, 36, 32, 27, and 19 months in the N0-stage, N1a-stage, N1b-stage, N2a-stage, and N2b-stage subgroups according to the 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor Lymph Node Metastasis (TNM) N-classification (P = 0.000), and 40, 29, 22, and 15 months in patients with metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) <0.25, 0.25–0.49, 0.5–0.74, and ≥0.75 subgroups (P = 0.000). In the COX model, the 7th AJCC TNM N-stage and LNR were independent prognostic factors. The mRNA profile was not associated with lymph node involvement.Both the N-stage according to the 7th AJCC TNM staging system and LNR had the capacity to subclassify synchronous resectable mCRC with different prognoses. The lymph node might be integrated into the AJCC staging system as a diagnose-delay prognostic factor for stage IV disease.     

Proposed modification of the eighth edition of the AJCC staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma

BackgroundTo improve the prognostic accuracy of the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) with establishment and validation of a modified TNM (mTNM) staging system.MethodsData on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for ICC was collected from 15 high-volume centers worldwide (n = 643). An external validation dataset was obtained from the SEER registry (n = 797). The mTNM staging system was proposed by redefining T categories, and incorporating the recently proposed N status as N0 (no lymph node metastasis [LNM]), N1 (1–2 LNM) and N2 (≥3 LNM).ResultsThe 8th AJCC TNM staging system failed to stratify overall survival (OS) of stage II versus IIIA, stage IIIB versus IV, as well as overall stage III versus IV among all patients from the two databases, as well as stage I versus II, and stage III versus III among patients who had ≥6 LNs examined. There was a monotonic decrement in survival based on the proposed mTNM staging classification among patients derived from both the multi-institutional (Median OS, stage I 69.8 vs. II 37.1 vs. III 18.9 vs. IV 16.4 months, all p < 0.05), and SEER (Median OS, stage I 87.0 vs. II 29.3 vs. III 17.7 vs. IV 14.2 months, all p < 0.05) datasets, which was also verified among patients who had ≥6 lymph node harvested from both databases.ConclusionThe modified TNM staging system for ICC using the new T and N definitions provided an improved means to stratify patients relative to long-term OS versus the 8th AJCC staging.     

Prognostic Value of Lymph Node Ratio in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Followed by Total Mesorectal Excision

Although the absolute number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) has been established as 1 of the most important prognostic factors in rectal cancers, many researchers have proposed that the lymph node ratio (LNR) may have better predicted outcomes. We conducted a retrospective study to compare the predictive ability of LNR and ypN category in rectal cancer.A total of 264 locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) patients who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by total mesorectal excision (TME) between 2005 and 2012 were reviewed. All patients were categorized into 3 groups or patients with metastatic LNs were categorized into 2 groups according to the LNR. The prognostic effect on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was evaluated.With a median follow-up of 45 months, the OS and DFS were 68.4% and 59.3% for the entire cohort, respectively. The respective 5-year OS and DFS rates for the 3 groups (LNR = 0, 0 < LNR ≤ 0.20, and 0.20 < LNR ≤ 1.0) were as follows: 83.2%, 72.6%, and 49.4% (P < 0.001) and 79.5%, 57.3%, and 33.5% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that LNR and differentiation, but not the number of positive LNs, had independent prognostic value for OS (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.328, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.850–4.526, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 3.004, 95% CI: 1.616–5.980, P < 0.001). As for patients with positive LNs, the respective 5-year OS and DFS rates for the 2 groups (0 < LNR ≤ 0.20, and 0.20 < LNR ≤ 1.0) were 72.6% and 49.4% (P < 0.001) and 57.3% and 33.5% (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that only LNR was an independent factor for OS (HR = 3.214, 95% CI: 1.726–5.986, P < 0.001) and DFS (HR = 4.230, 95% CI: 1.825–6.458, P < 0.001). Subgroups analysis demonstrated that the ypN category had no impact on survival whereas increased LNR was a significantly prognostic indicator for worse survival in the LNs < 12 subgroup.LNR is an independent prognostic factor in LARC patients treated with preoperative CRT followed by TME. It may be a better independent staging method than the number of metastatic LNs when <12 LNs are harvested after preoperative CRT.     

Validation of T Stage According to Depth of Invasion and N Stage Subclassification Based on Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes for Distal Extrahepatic Bile Duct (EBD) Carcinoma

According to the current AJCC staging system, the T stage of distal extrahepatic bile duct carcinoma (EBD) is classified according to the extent of the tumor within or beyond the bile duct wall. However many invasive carcinoma accompany stromal desmoplasia that obscure lower boundary of bile duct wall; it is frequently difficult to clearly define the extent of tumors using the current T classification system. In this study, we validated an alternative T classification system by depth of invasion (DoI; T1: < 5 mm, T2: 5 to 12 mm, and T3: ≥ 12 mm). Specifically, we evaluated DoI in 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using digital scan images to achieve more objective measurements of tumor DoI. In addition, we evaluated the effect of the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) as well as the number of total examined LNs on the survival rate in the same patient group, and performed a comparative analysis of these data to assess patient survival. We also analyzed 114 cases of distal EBD carcinoma using the current T and N classification of the AJCC staging system (7th edition). The T stage of the current AJCC staging system was not associated with significant differences in patient survival, especially between T2 and T3. However, T staging by DoI was associated with statistically significant differences in patient survival (P < 0.001 in DoI-1, P = 0.002 in DoI-2). With respect to N stage, we divided patients into 3 tiers comprising class 1 (no nodal metastasis), class 2 (1–3 nodal metastases), and class 3 (4 or more nodal metastases). In 3-tier classification analysis, the median survival times for classes 1, 2, and 3 were 79.2, 28.8, and 10.9 months, respectively. The difference in survival among the 3 classes was statistically significant (P < 0.001). We found the cut-off value of 11 LNs (1 to 10 vs ≥ 11) for N0 stage showed most significant difference (P = 0.007). We think at least 11 LNs should be examined for more accurate evaluation of N stage in distal EBD carcinoma. We propose an alternative T classification using DoI and 3-tier sub-classification of N stage for distal EBD carcinoma.     

Evaluation of the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system for patients undergoing curative resection of hepatocellular carcinoma: implications for the development of a refined staging system

Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the seventh edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) staging system and to compare its efficacy with those of the fifth and sixth editions of the AJCC staging system and the TNM staging system defined by the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan.Methods Data for 754 patients submitted to hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) between 1989 and 2005 were reviewed. Tumour-free survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared between subgroups using the log-rank test. Prognostic factors for tumour-free survival were identified by multivariable analysis. The accuracy of these staging systems was evaluated using the Cox regression model and a refined staging system was developed based on the drawbacks of the respective systems.Results According to the criteria defined by the seventh AJCC TNM staging system, 5-year survival was 50.6% in patients with T1 tumours, 21.0% in patients with T2 tumours, 14.6% in patients with T3a tumours, 12.1% in patients with T3b tumours, and 12.9% in patients with T4 tumours. There was no survival difference between patients with T3a and T3b tumours (P = 0.073), nor between those with T3b and T4 tumours (P = 0.227). Significant prognostic tumour factors were microvascular invasion, tumour multiplicity, bilobar disease and a tumour size of ≥5.0 cm. The fifth and sixth editions of the AJCC TNM staging system were found to be more accurate in prognosis than the seventh.Conclusions The seventh edition of the AJCC TNM staging system is able to adequately stratify patients with early HCC only. A refined staging system is therefore proposed.     

Comparative analysis of methodologies for predicting overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer based on the number and rate of resected positive lymph nodes: A study based on the SEER database for 2010 through 2019

Background

Lymph node (LN) metastasis is crucial in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) prognosis and treatment, but the TNM system lacks LN quantity consideration. Our goal is to investigate the role of positive LNs (nPLN) and positive LN rate (LNR) in overall survival (OS) and assess whether they offer higher value in prognostic assessment of NSCLC than N-stage.

Methods

Patients were stratified into four subgroups using X-Tile software. Statistical analysis was conducted using the Kaplan–Meier method, univariate analysis, and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Model performance was evaluated using the Harrell consistency index (C-index), Akaike information criterion (AIC), and Bayesian information criterion (BIC). The prognostic performance of the nodal classification was validated using overall survival as the endpoint.

Results

The survival curves demonstrate distinct disparities between each nPLN and LNR category. A pronounced trend toward deteriorating overall survival from N-PLN 1 to N-PLN 2+ was observed across all tumor size categories. However, the differences between each LNR category were only significant for tumors ≤3 cm and 5–7 cm. Notably, both nPLN and LNR classifications displayed a higher C-index, lower AIC, and lower BIC compared with the N staging. Furthermore, the LNR classification provided superior prognostic stratification when compared with the nPLN classification.

Conclusions

Our results demonstrate that nPLN and LNR classifications may offer improved prognostic performance compared with the current N classification for LN-positive NSCLC patients. Nonetheless, more studies are needed to assess the feasibility of incorporating these classifications into the next TNM staging system.     

Optimal Cut-Off Values of Lymph Node Ratio Predicting Recurrence in Papillary Thyroid Cancer

Regional lymph node (LN) metastasis has a significant impact for prediction of recurrence in patients with papillary thyroid cancers (PTC); however, the prognostic value of the lymph node ratio (LNR), which is defined as the ratio of the number of metastatic LNs to the total number of investigated LNs, is controversial. In this study, we determined the optimal cut-off values of LNRs for the prediction of recurrence in PTC patients.This large cohort study retrospectively evaluated 2294 patients who had undergone total thyroidectomy for PTC at a single institution from October 1985 to June 2009. The prediction probability of central LNR (cLNR, level VI) and total LNR (tLNR, levels II–VI) were estimated by binominal logistic regression analysis. Hazard ratios of the cut-off LNR values for cancer recurrence were calculated for relevant covariates using multivariate Cox regression analyses. Kaplan–Meier analyses were also utilized to assess the effects of estimated LNR cut-off values on recurrence-free survival (RFS).Of the 2294 patients, 138 (6.0%) presented cancer recurrence during the follow-up period (median duration = 107.1 months). The prediction probability indicated that LNRs of 0.4 and 0.5 for central LN and total LN, respectively, are optimal cut-off values for precise prediction with minimization of outliers. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that cLNR ≥0.4 was independently predictive of recurrence in patients with N0 and N1a PTCs (hazard ratio [HR]: 7.016, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.72–12.986, P < 0.001) and that tLNR ≥0.5 indicated a significantly increased risk of recurrence in patients with N1b PTCs (HR: 2.372, 95% CI: 1.458–3.860, P < 0.001). In addition, Kaplan–Meier analyses clearly demonstrated that these LNR cut-off values are precisely operational in RFS estimation.The cut-off LNR values of 0.4 and 0.5 for cLNR and tLNR, respectively, were identified. Risk stratification combined with these LNR cut-off values may prove useful to determine treatment and follow-up strategies for PTC patients.     

Defining a minimum number of examined lymph nodes improves the prognostic value of lymphadenectomy in pancreas ductal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundLymph node (LN) metastasis is associated with decreased survival following resection for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). In N0 disease, increasing total evaluated LN (ELN) correlates with improved outcomes suggesting patients may be understaged when LNs are undersampled. We aim to assess the optimal number of examined lymph nodes (ELN) following pancreatectomy.MethodsData from 1837 patients undergoing surgery were prospectively collected. The binomial probability law was utilized to analyze the minimum number of examined LNs (minELN) and accurately characterize each histopathologic stage. LN ratio (LNR) was compared to American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) guidelines.ResultsAs ELN total increased, the likelihood of finding node positive disease increased. An evaluation based upon the binomial probability law suggested an optimal minELN of 12 for accurate AJCC N staging. As the number of ELNs increased, the discriminatory capacity of alternative strategies to characterize LN disease exceeded that offered by AJCC N stage.ConclusionThis is the first study dedicated to optimizing histopathologic staging in PDAC using models of minELN informed by the binomial probability law. This study highlights two separate cutoffs for ELNs depending upon prognostic goal and validates that 12 LNs are adequate to determine AJCC N stage for the majority of patients.     

Caspase-3 expression in metastatic lymph nodes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is prognostic of survival

AIM:To assess whether differential expression of caspase-3 in paired metastatic lymph nodes(LNs)is prognostic of survival in patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma(ESCC).METHODS:Capases-3 expression was evaluated immunohistochemically in 122 pairs of primary ESCCs and regional metastatic LNs assembled on tissue microarrays.The impact of caspase-3 expression on survival outcomes was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards regression model.RESULTS:The level of caspase-3 expression was significantly higher in LN metastases than in primary tumors(P<0.001).Caspase-3 expression in the primary tumors was associated with longer median survival(23 mo vs21 mo,P=0.033),whereas higher expression in paired metastatic LNs was associated with shorter median survival(20 mo vs 22 mo,P=0.043).Multivariate analysis showed that both were independent prognostic factors.CONCLUSION:Caspase-3 expression in metastatic LNs may be a potential independent predictor of poorer overall survival in patients with resected ESCC and LN metastasis.Protein expression in metastatic tumors may be a biomarker prognostic of survival.     

Original study: The rescue staging for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma with inadequate examined lymph nodes

BackgroundIn previous studies, it’s recommended that the lymph node involvement should be evaluated with enough examined lymph nodes (eLNs) in the 8th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for pancreatic cancer. This study aims to put forward a rescue staging system for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients with inadequate eLNs after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).Method11,224 PDAC patients undergoing PD in The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were included. Another Ruijin Pancreatic Disease Center (RJPDC) database consisted of 821 patients was utilized for external validation.ResultsThe proportions of patients with eLNs≥15 were 44.7% and 32.8% in SEER and RJPDC database separately. The rescue staging system was put forward relying on LNR (HR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.74–1.92, P < 0.001) for N staging of eLNs<15 population and pLNs for the rest. The TNM modalities were also rearranged in the rescue system for better survival coordination. The C-index of rescue staging system was 0.638 while that of AJCC 8th staging system was 0.613 in SEER database. Similar phenomena were observed in RJPDC database. Kaplan-Meier analyses revealed reliable internal coherences (SEER: Ib: P = 0.26; IIa: P = 0.063; IIb: P = 0.53; IIIa: P = 0.11. RJPDC: Ib: P = 0.32; IIa: P = 0.66; IIb: P = 0.76; IIIa: P = 0.66) and significant staging efficiency (SEER: P < 0.001; RJPDC: P = 0.002).ConclusionA rescue staging system was put forward regardless of the eLNs number. And the novel system manifested better predictive capacity than 8th AJCC staging system.     

TNM Staging of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Observational Analysis and Comparison by Both AJCC and ENETS Systems From 1 Single Institution

We aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and compare the surgical outcome of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (p-NETs) using the 2 tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) systems by both the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Staging Manual (seventh edition) and the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (ENETS). Moreover, we sought to validate the prognostic value of the new AJCC criterion.Data of 145 consecutive patients who were all surgically treated and histologically diagnosed as p-NETs from January 2002 to June 2013 in our single institution were retrospectively collected and analyzed.The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for AJCC classifications of stages I, II, III, and IV were 79.5%, 63.1%, 15.0%, and NA, respectively, (P < 0.005). As for the ENETS system, the OS rates at 5 years for stages I, II, III, and IV were 75.5%, 72.7%, 29.0%, and NA, respectively, (P < 0.005). Both criteria present no statistically notable difference between stage I and stage II (P > 0.05) but between stage I and stages III and IV (P < 0.05), as well as those between stage II and stages III and IV (P < 0.05). Difference between stage III and IV by ENETS was significant (P = 0.031), whereas that by the AJCC was not (P = 0.144). What''s more, the AJCC Staging Manual (seventh edition) was statistically significant in both uni- and multivariate analyses by Cox regression (P < 0.005 and P = 0.025, respectively).Our study indicated that the ENETS TNM staging system might be superior to the AJCC Staging Manual (seventh edition) for the clinical practice of p-NETs. Together with tumor grade and radical resection, the new AJCC system was also validated to be an independent predictor for p-NETs.     

Significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer

AIM: To investigate the significance of the preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio(NLR) in the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer(GC). METHODS: The clinical data of 291 GC patients were analysed retrospectively; these patients were divided into two groups according to their preoperative NLR: a high-NLR group(NLR ≥ 3.5, 131 cases) and a low-NLR group(NLR 3.5, 160 cases). The clinicopathological characteristics and five-year survival rates of the two groups were compared. The NLR and other clinicopathological factors were subjected to univariate and multivariate survival analysis to evaluate the effects of the NLR on the prognosis of GC patients. RESULTS: The lowest preoperative NLR among the 291 patients was 0.56, whereas the highest preoperative NLR was 74.5. The mean preoperative NLR was 5.99 ± 8.98. Age, tumour size, T staging, tumour-node-metastasis(TNM) staging and platelet count were significantly different between the highand low-NLR groups(P 0.05). The five-year survival rate of the high-NLR group was 17.0%, which was significantly lower than that of the low-NLR group(43.6%; 17.0% vs 43.6%, P 0.05). The univariate analysis results showed that the five-year survival rate was related to age, tumour size, T staging, N staging, TNM staging, carcinoembryonic antigen value and NLR(P 0.05). Multivariate analysis results showed that the NLR was an independent risk factor that likely affected the five-year survival rate of GC patients(P = 0.003, HR = 0.626, 95%CI: 0.460-0.852). CONCLUSION: The preoperative NLR could be used as a prognostic factor for GC patients; in particular, a high NLR corresponded to poor prognosis of GC patients.     

Comparative performances of staging systems for early hepatocellular carcinoma

Background:

Several staging systems for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have been proposed, but studies of their prognostic accuracy have yielded conflicting conclusions. Stratifying patients with early HCC is of particular interest because these patients may derive the greatest benefit from intervention, yet no studies have evaluated the comparative performances of staging systems in patients with early HCC.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was performed using data on 379 patients who underwent liver resection or liver transplantation for HCC at six major hepatobiliary centres in the USA and Europe. The staging systems evaluated were: the Okuda staging system, the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) staging system, the Cancer of the Liver Italian Programme (CLIP) score, the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system, the Japanese Integrated Staging (JIS) score and the American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer (AJCC/UICC) staging system, 6th edition. A recently proposed early HCC prognostic score was also evaluated. The discriminative abilities of the staging systems were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards models and the bootstrap-corrected concordance index (c).

Results:

Overall survival of the cohort was 74% at 3 years and 52% at 5 years, with a median survival of 62 months. Most systems demonstrated poor discriminatory ability (P > 0.05 on Cox proportional hazards analysis, c≈ 0.5). However, the AJCC/UICC system clearly stratified patients (P < 0.001, c= 0.59), albeit only into two groups. The early HCC prognostic score also clearly stratified patients (P < 0.001, c= 0.60) and identified three distinct prognostic groups.

Discussion:

The early HCC prognostic score is superior to the AJCC/UICC staging system (6th edition) for predicting the survival of patients with early HCC after liver resection or liver transplantation. Other major HCC staging systems perform poorly in patients with early HCC.     

Recursive Partitioning Analysis of Lymph Node Ratio in Breast Cancer Patients

Lymph node ratio (LNR) is a powerful prognostic factor for breast cancer. We conducted a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of the LNR to identify the prognostic risk groups in breast cancer patients. Records of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients between 2002 and 2006 were searched in the Taiwan Cancer Database. The end of follow-up was December 31, 2009. We excluded patients with distant metastases, inflammatory breast cancer, survival <1 month, no mastectomy, or missing lymph node status. Primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). For univariate significant predictors, RPA were used to determine the risk groups. Among the 11,349 eligible patients, we identified 4 prognostic factors (including LNR) for survival, resulting in 8 terminal nodes. The LNR cutoffs were 0.038, 0.259, and 0.738, which divided LNR into 4 categories: very low (LNR ≤ 0.038), low (0.038 < LNR ≤ 0.259), moderate (0.259 < LNR ≤ 0.738), and high (0.738 < LNR). Then, 4 risk groups were determined as follows: Class 1 (very low risk, 8,265 patients), Class 2 (low risk, 1,901 patients), Class 3 (moderate risk, 274 patients), and Class 4 (high risk, 900 patients). The 5-year OS for Class 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 93.2%, 83.1%, 72.3%, and 56.9%, respectively (P< 0.001). The hazard ratio of death was 2.70, 4.52, and 8.59 (95% confidence interval 2.32–3.13, 3.49–5.86, and 7.48–9.88, respectively) times for Class 2, 3, and 4 compared with Class 1 (P < 0.001). In conclusion, we identified the optimal cutoff LNR values based on RPA and determined the related risk groups, which successfully predict 5-year OS in breast cancer patients.     

American Joint Committee on Cancer staging for resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a comparison of the 6th and 7th editions

ObjectivesThis study was conducted to evaluate the prognostic value of, respectively, the 6th and 7th editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system for patients with resected perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC).MethodsPatients who underwent resection of PHC between 1991 and 2012 were identified from prospective databases at two centres. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared across stage groups with the log-rank test. The concordance index and Brier score were used to compare the prognostic accuracy of the staging systems.ResultsData for a total of 306 patients were analysed. Staging according to the 7th edition upstaged 63% of patients in comparison with staging by the 6th edition. The log-rank P-value for both staging systems was highly statistically significant (P < 0.001). Staging according to the 6th edition categorized 93% of patients as having stage I or II disease, whereas staging according to the 7th edition distributed patients more equally across stages. Prognostic accuracy was similar between the staging systems: the concordance index was 0.59 and the Brier score 0.17 for both the 6th and 7th editions. The same prognostic accuracy was achieved using an alternative tumour–node–metastasis (TNM) stage grouping simplified to four rather than six stage groups.ConclusionsThe 6th and 7th editions of the AJCC staging system for PHC have similar prognostic accuracy. Other prognostic factors can potentially improve individual patient prognostication.     

Prognostic value of the lymph node ratio after resection of periampullary carcinomas

Background

Data have indicated that the lymph node ratio (LNR) may be a better prognostic indicator than lymph node status in pancreatic cancer.

Objectives

To analyse the value of the LNR in patients undergoing resection for periampullary carcinomas.

Methods

A cut off value of 0.2 was assigned to the LNR in accordance with published studies. The impact of histopathological factors including a LNR was analysed using Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods.

Results

In total, 551 patients undergoing a resection (January 2000 to December 2010) were analysed. The median lymph node yield was 15, and 198 (34%) patients had a LNR > 0.2. In patients with a LNR of > 0.2, the median overall survival (OS) was 18 versus 33 months in patients with an LNR < 0.2 (P < 0.001). Univariate analysis demonstrated a LNR > 0.2, T and N stage, vascular or perineural invasion, grade and resection margin status to be significantly associated with OS. On multivariate analysis, only a LNR > 0.2, vascular or perineural invasion and margin positivity remained significant. In N1 disease, a LNR was able to distinguish survival in patients with a similar lymph node burden, and correlated with more aggressive tumour pathological variables.

Conclusion

A LNR > 0.2, and not lymph note status, is an independent prognostic factor for OS indicating the LNR should be utilized in outcome stratification.     

Radical lymph node dissection and assessment:Impact on gallbladder cancer prognosis

AIM: To investigate the lymph node metastasis patterns of gallbladder cancer(GBC) and evaluate the optimal categorization of nodal status as a critical prognostic factor.METHODS: From May 1995 to December 2010,a total of 78 consecutive patients with GBC underwent a radical resection at Liaocheng People’s Hospital.A radical resection was defined as removing both the primary tumor and the regional lymph nodes of the gallbladder.Demographic,operative and pathologic data were recorded.The lymph nodes retrieved were examined histologically for metastases routinely from each node.The positive lymph node count(PLNC) as well as the total lymph node count(TLNC) was recorded for each patient.Then the metastatic to examined lymph nodes ratio(LNR) was calculated.Disease-specific survival(DSS) and predictors of outcome were analyzed.RESULTS: With a median follow-up time of 26.50 mo(range,2-132 mo),median DSS was 29.00 ± 3.92 mo(5-year survival rate,20.51%).Nodal disease was found in 37 patients(47.44%).DSS of node-negative patients was significantly better than that of nodepositive patients(median DSS,40 mo vs 17 mo,χ2= 14.814,P < 0.001),while there was no significant difference between N1 patients and N2 patients(median DSS,18 mo vs 13 mo,χ2= 0.741,P = 0.389).Optimal TLNC was determined to be four.When node-negative patients were divided according to TLNC,there was no difference in DSS between TLNC < 4 subgroup and TLNC ≥ 4 subgroup(median DSS,37 mo vs 54 mo,χ2 = 0.715,P = 0.398).For node-positive patients,DSS of TLNC < 4 subgroup was worse than that of TLNC ≥ 4 subgroup(median DSS,13 mo vs 21 mo,χ2= 11.035,P < 0.001).Moreover,for node-positive patients,a new cut-off value of six nodes was identified for the number of TLNC that clearly stratified them into 2 separate survival groups(< 6 or ≥ 6,respectively;median DSS,15 mo vs 33 mo,χ2= 11.820,P < 0.001).DSS progressively worsened with increasing PLNC and LNR,but no definite cut-off value could be identified.Multivariate analysis revealed hist     

Prognostic and survival analysis of 837 Chinese colorectal cancer patients

AIM:To develop a prognostic model to predict survival of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS:Survival data of 837 CRC patients undergoing surgery between 1996 and 2006 were collected and analyzed by univariate analysis and Cox proportional hazard regression model to reveal the prognostic factors for CRC. All data were recorded using a standard data form and analyzed using SPSS version 18.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, United States). Survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log rank test was used to assess differences in survival. Univariate hazard ratios and significant and independent predictors of disease-specific survival and were identified by Cox proportional hazard analysis. The stepwise procedure was set to a threshold of 0.05. Statistical significance was defined asP < 0.05. RESULTS:The survival rate was 74% at 3 years and 68% at 5 years. The results of univariate analysis suggested age, preoperative obstruction, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level at diagnosis, status of resection, tumor size, histological grade, pathological type, lymphovascular invasion, invasion of adjacent organs, and tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging were positive prognostic factors (P < 0.05). Lymph node ratio (LNR) was also a strong prognostic factor in stage Ⅲ CRC (P < 0.0001). We divided 341 stage Ⅲ patients into three groups according to LNR values (LNR1, LNR ≤ 0.33, n = 211; LNR2, LNR 0.34-0.66, n = 76; and LNR3, LNR ≥ 0.67, n = 54). Univariate analysis showed a significant statistical difference in 3-year survival among these groups:LNR1, 73%; LNR2, 55%; and LNR3, 42% (P < 0.0001). The multivariate analysis results showed that histological grade, depth of bowel wall invasion, and number of metastatic lymph nodes were the most important prognostic factors for CRC if we did not consider the interaction of the TNM staging system (P < 0.05). When the TNM staging was taken into account, histological grade lost its statistical significance, while the specific TNM staging system s     

Prognostic Value of the Metastatic Lymph Node Ratio in Patients With Resectable Carcinoma of Ampulla of Vater

Patients with carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (CAV) have better outcomes among periampullary malignancies. However, little is known about the metastatic lymph node ratio (LNR) as a prognostic factor for resectable CAV. We retrospectively reviewed our CAV patients undergoing curative surgery and analyzed their prognostic factors.A total of 212 CAV patients who received radical surgery at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, between 2000 and 2010 were admitted in this study. The lymph node ratio was defined as the number of metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) divided by the total number of LNs removed. The patients’ demographic data, comorbidities, operation type, and tumor features were analyzed retrospectively for survival prediction of patients.The median age of the patients was 62 years, and 57% of the patients were men. The surgical procedure was standard pancreaticoduodenectomy and pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy in 53% and 47% of the patients, respectively. The median follow-up duration was 32.6 months, and 50% of the patients had died by the end of the study. The median overall survival time (OS) and disease-free survival time (DFS) were 65.8 and 33.7 months, respectively. In multivariate analysis, patients with a metastatic LNR >0.056 had a significantly poor prognosis in both OS and DFS.A metastatic LNR >0.056 predicted a poor DFS and OS in CAV patients after radical surgery. Greater awareness on the impact of metastatic LNR may help clinicians provide appropriate adjuvant treatment for high-risk CAV patients.     

Comparison of clinicopathologic features and survival between eastern and western population with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is the major histologic subtype of esophageal cancer, characterized by a high mortality rate and geographic differences in incidences. It is unknown whether there is difference between “eastern” ESCC and “western” ESCC. This study is attempted to demonstrate the hypothesis by comparing ESCC between Chinese residents and Caucasians living in the US.

Methods

The data sources of this study are from United States SEER limited-use database and Shanghai Cancer Registries by Shanghai Municipal Center for Disease Control (SMCDC). Consecutive, non-selected patients with pathologically diagnosed ESCC, between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2006, were included in this analysis. 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival estimates were computed and compared between two populations. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine factors affecting survival differences.

Results

A total of 1,718 Chinese, 1,624 Caucasians ESCC patients with individual American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging information were included in this study. The Caucasian group had a significantly higher proportion of female patients than Chinese (38.24% vs. 18.68% P<0.01). ESCC was diagnosed in Chinese patients at an earlier age and stage than Caucasians. Generally, Chinese patients had similar overall survival rate with Caucasian by both univariate and multivariate analysis. Overall survival was significantly worse only in male Caucasians compared to Chinese patients (median survival time, 12.4 vs. 14.5 months, P<0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

ESCC from eastern and western countries might have some different features. These differences need to be taken into account for the management of ESCC patients in different ethnic groups.