Low Yield and High Cost of Gastric and Duodenal Biopsies for Investigation of Symptoms of Abdominal Pain During Routine Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

Background

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) referrals for symptoms of abdominal pain are common. Current guidelines for dyspepsia recommend biopsies of gastric mucosa for Helicobacter pylori in all patients referred for EGD. Our study aimed to determine the clinical yield and cost-effectiveness of gastric and duodenal biopsy in EGDs performed for abdominal pain.

Methods

Three hundred and ninety-one outpatient EGDs performed at a single academic tertiary care center were studied. For each procedure, endoscopic as well as pathologic findings from the stomach and duodenum were then recorded. Charge of biopsy was calculated using the increased charges for professional fees, forceps, and pathology fees when a biopsy was performed.

Results

Gastric biopsies were obtained on 304 EGDs performed with 13 (4.2%) patients diagnosed with H. pylori. In patients with abnormal gastric mucosa on EGD, 11 of 167 (6.5%) were positive for H. pylori compared to 2 of 137 (1.4%) with normal appearing mucosa (p = 0.02). Charge per diagnosis of H. pylori for normal mucosa was calculated to be $43,073. Duodenal biopsies were performed in 263 cases. Celiac disease was diagnosed in 4 of 263 cases (1.5%). Of patients with abnormal duodenal mucosa on EGD, 1 of 36 (2.7%) were positive for celiac disease compared to 3 of 227 (1.3%) with normal mucosa (p = 0.57). Charge per diagnosis of celiac disease for normal mucosa was calculated to be $47,580.

Conclusion

Routine biopsy during EGD for symptoms of abdominal pain has low yield with high costs. Practice of routine biopsies of normal appearing tissue and the present guidelines should be reconsidered in the investigation of abdominal pain with EGD.

     

The value of duodenal biopsy within routine upper endoscopy: a prospective study in 1000 patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Several gastrointestinal diseases are localised in the small bowel and are confirmed by duodenal biopsies upon upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. However, the clinical value of routine duodenal biopsies during endoscopy has not been satisfactorily defined and was assessed in the current study. METHODS: In 1000 consecutive patients duodenal biopsies were performed during routine upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Endoscopic diagnoses, symptoms and the prevalence of anaemia were correlated with the histological diagnoses. RESULTS: Coeliac disease and giardiasis was diagnosed in 18 and two patients, respectively (2.0 % of all cases). In 11 (55 %) patients the diagnosis was already made macroscopically during endoscopy. The sensitivity for endoscopic diagnosis of coeliac disease MARSH III was 84.6 %. There was no correlation between clinical symptoms, the prevalence of anaemia and the diagnosis of coeliac disease or giardiasis in our cohort. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic diagnosis of advanced celiac disease (MARSH III) can be made with high sensitivity and specifity. Nevertheless, duodenal biopsy is necessary for the diagnosis of early coeliac disease or giardiasis. However, the routine duodenal sampling of normal mucosa during gastrointestinal endoscopy cannot be recommended.     

The significance of routine duodenal biopsies in pediatric patients undergoing upper intestinal endoscopy

GOALS: To determine the significance of performing routine duodenal biopsies during upper intestinal endoscopy in a pediatric population and to evaluate their contribution to the overall diagnosis. BACKGROUND: Performing duodenal biopsy during every upper endoscopy regardless of the indication for endoscopy and the macroscopic findings, is a controversial topic. Advocates of performing routine biopsies argue that unexpected pathology such as villous atrophy, may have significant clinical implications. Opponents argue that the yield of performing a biopsy on an apparently normal mucosa is low. STUDY: Duodenal biopsies, routinely taken from 201 pediatric patients during upper endoscopy over a 26-month period were retrospectively reviewed. Duodenal biopsies taken during this period for suspected mucosal lesions were not included in the analysis. Indications for endoscopy included suspected peptic disease, gastroesophageal reflux, unexplained vomiting, abdominal pain, iron deficiency anemia and Crohn disease. RESULTS: Of the 201 sets of biopsies reviewed, 159 (79.1%) were normal, 7 had insufficient material for evaluation and 35 (17.4%) carried abnormalities that included: 10 Giardia lamblia (4.9%), 13 mild chronic inflammation (6.5%), and 8 increased intraepithelial lymphocytes (3.9%). Two biopsies showed mixed acute and chronic inflammation, 1 showed lymphatic dilatation and 1 had a mild mucosal lesion. The risk for microscopic pathology in the duodenum was higher when Helicobacter pylori was present in the gastric biopsy (25.98% vs. 12.16% P < 0.02). The negative predictive value of a normal appearing duodenal mucosa was 81.5%, implying that a normal appearing mucosa does not rule out pathology. No complications were encountered in our series. CONCLUSION: We suggest that the inclusion of routine duodenal biopsies as part of upper endoscopy in pediatric patients should be considered favorably. This practice may yield additional pathologic findings that otherwise could have been missed. It should be done regardless of the indication for endoscopy or the gross appearance of the mucosa. This practice does not increase the risk of the procedure.     

Giardia lamblia infection in patients with irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia： A prospective study

AIM:To evaluate the prevalence of Giardia lamblia(G.lamblia)infection in patients with irritable bowel syndrome(IBS)and dyspepsia and to establish which is the mostaccurate test to diagnose the infection in this setting.METHODS:One hundred and thirty-seven patients whoconsecutively attended the Outpatient GastroenterologyClinic for the first time between January 2002 and De-cember 2003 due to symptoms of IBS and/or dyspepsiawere recruited.All patients underwent clinical evaluation,first-step haematology and chemistry tests,serologic as-says for celiac disease,lactose-H2 breath test,abdominalultrasonography,and esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Helicobacter pylori status was evaluated.In patients withsymptoms of IBS older than 45 years,colonoscopy wasalso performed.In all patients,duodenal biopsies andstool samples were examined for trophozoites and cystsof G.lamblia by several methods.RESULTS:G.lamblia was identified in 9 patients.Thefollowing diagnoses were also made:IBS(100/137,73%),functional dyspepsia(62/137,45%),organicdyspepsia(33/137,24%),and lactose intolerance(75/137,55%).A significant association was foundbetween giardiasis and H pylori infection(X~2=6.632,OR=12.4,CI=1.5-68.1).There were no symptomsthat reliably allowed the recognition of giardiasis.Direct search of the parasite in duodenal biopsy andstool sample examinations gave concordant results inall cases while histological examination of duodenal biopsies displayed a low sensitivity(e.g.,22.2%).CONCLUSION:In this consecutive series,diagnosisof G.lamblia infection accounted for 6.5% of patientswith IBS and dyspepsia.Duodenal biopsies for diag-nosis of giardiasis may be unnecessary if stool sampleexamination is performed.     

Diagnostic yield of routine duodenal biopsies in iron deficiency anaemia: a study from Western Anatolia

OBJECTIVE: The role of routine endoscopic duodenal biopsies obtained during the evaluation of iron deficiency anaemia is being increasingly emphasized, but insufficiently applied. Diagnostic yield of this practice, mainly identification of coeliac disease, differs in different populations and geographic regions. The aim of this study is to assess the usefulness of routine duodenal biopsies during upper endoscopy in patients presenting with iron deficiency anaemia in Western Anatolia. METHODS: Routine duodenal biopsies were evaluated over a 12-month period in 100 consecutive adult patients with iron deficiency anaemia undergoing upper endoscopy. All potential bleeding lesions were identified and gastric as well as duodenal biopsies were taken for histopathologic investigation. RESULTS: A bleeding lesion is identified in 44% of cases. Duodenal biopsy gives an additional 5% diagnostic yield and revealed three patients with coeliac disease and two patients with giardiasis. One of the patients diagnosed with coeliac disease had a second bleeding lesion at the upper endoscopic examination. Appearance of the duodenal mucosa was normal in all patients including those with diagnostic duodenal biopsy. CONCLUSIONS: Routine duodenal sampling during the upper endoscopic examination gives an additional 5% diagnostic benefit and this practice should be included in the diagnostic work-up of patients with iron deficiency anaemia. As one of the patients who was found to have coeliac disease had a second bleeding lesion that may otherwise explain iron deficiency anaemia, finding a source for bleeding at the upper endoscopy should not preclude duodenal biopsy. Moreover, performing duodenal biopsy is still necessary even though the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is normal. Aside from coeliac disease, Giardia infestation could be identified as a contributory factor for iron deficiency anaemia, in endemic regions.     

Celiac disease and recurrent pancreatitis

BACKGROUND: Celiac disease is associated with pancreatico-biliary disease. Postulated mechanisms include reduced gallbladder emptying due to impaired cholecystokinin release and pancreatitis due to malnutrition. We hypothesize that celiac disease may also be associated with pancreatico-biliary abnormalities due to duodenal inflammation and papillary stenosis. METHODS: Over a 48-month period, 169 patients referred for possible sphincter of Oddi dysfunction who underwent pancreatico-biliary manometry were tested for gliadin and endomysial antibodies. Duodenal and papillary biopsies were preformed in those patients who were positive. RESULTS: Celiac disease was diagnosed in 12 (7.1%; 3 men, 9 women). The mean age was 61 years as compared with 37 years for those patients without celiac disease. All of the celiac patients had been referred for recurrent abdominal pain and/or idiopathic pancreatitis. Ten had idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis with elevated amylase and lipase levels. Two of these patients also had mildly elevated liver function tests associated with the abdominal pain. Only 3 of 12 patients had a prior diagnosis of celiac disease. These 12 patients had manometric evidence of stenosis and histologic evidence of periampullary inflammation as well as histologic changes consistent with celiac disease. In 10 of 12 patients sphincterotomy or extension of a prior papillotomy was performed. Two patients were treated with a gluten-free diet alone. CONCLUSIONS: We describe 12 patients with papillary stenosis and celiac disease. In 9 cases the celiac disease was a new diagnosis. Celiac disease should be considered in the etiology of papillary stenosis or idiopathic recurrent pancreatitis.     

Giardiasis in patients with dyspeptic symptoms

AIM: To investigate the prevalence of giardiasis in patients with dyspeptic symptoms. METHODS: Clinical records of consecutive patients who attended Gastroenterology Department at Aga Khan University Hospital from January 2000 to June 2003 and had esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) with duodenal biopsies and international classification of diseases 9th revision with clinical modifications (ICD-9-CM) coded with giardiasis were studied. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty patients fulfilled the above criteria. There were 44% (96/220) patients who were giardiasis positive, 72% (69/96) of them were males and 28% (27/96) of them were females. There were 65% (81/124) males and 35% (43/124) females who were giardiasis negative. The mean age of patients with giardiasis was 28±17 years, while that of giardiasis negative patients was 40±18 years (P<0.001). In patients with giardiasis, abdominal pain was present in 71% (68/96) of patients (P = 0.02) and diarrhea in 29% (28/96) (P = 0.005); duodenitis in 25% (24/96) on EGD (P = 0.006) and in 68% (65/96) on histopathology (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: Giardiasis occurs significantly in young people with abdominal pain, while endoscopic duodenitis is seen in only 25% of giardiasis positive cases, which supports routine duodenal biopsy.     

Video capsule enteroscopy in the diagnosis of celiac disease: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVES: Duodenal biopsy is the current gold standard for diagnosis of celiac disease. Videocapsule endoscopy examines the entire small bowel and allows visualization of mucosal villi. We evaluated the potential of videocapsule endoscopy in assessing the severity and extent of mucosal changes in patients with suspected celiac disease. METHODS: Consecutive patients with signs/symptoms suggesting celiac disease and positive anti-gliadin and/or anti-endomysial and/or anti-tissue transglutaminase antibodies underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and videocapsule endoscopy. Duodenal biopsies were classified according to modified Marsh's criteria. Capsule findings were evaluated for the presence of lesions compatible with celiac disease (scalloping of duodenal folds, fissures, flat mucosa, and mosaic appearance). RESULTS: Forty-three patients were studied. Duodenal histology was normal in 11 and compatible with celiac disease in 32. Using duodenal histology as the gold standard, the performance characteristics of capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of celiac disease were: sensitivity 87.5% (95% CI 76.1-98.9%), specificity 90.9% (95% CI 81.0-100%), positive predictive value 96.5% (95% CI 90.1-100%), negative predictive value 71.4% (95% CI 55.8-87%), positive and negative likelihood ratios 9.6 and 0.14, respectively. Eighteen patients had mucosal changes extending beyond the duodenum, involving the entire small bowel in three. These patients tended to have more severe symptoms, but the difference was not statistically significant. Interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of celiac disease by capsule endoscopy ranged between 79.2 and 94.4%; kappa values ranged between 0.56 and 0.87. CONCLUSIONS: Videocapsule endoscopy shows good sensitivity and excellent specificity for the detection of villous atrophy in patients with suspected celiac disease.     

EGD in children with abdominal pain: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic review to examine the diagnostic yield (endoscopic and histologic) of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) for the evaluation of abdominal pain of unclear etiology in children. We also examined the effect of EGD on change in treatment, quality of life, change in abdominal pain, and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: All full-length articles published in English during 1966-2005 were included if: (a) participants had abdominal pain without known underlying gastrointestinal disease, (b) participants underwent EGD primarily for the evaluation of abdominal pain, (c) findings of the EGD were reported, (d) participants were under 18 yr, and (e) sample size greater than 50. RESULTS: Eighteen articles examining 1,871 patients fulfilled the inclusion and exclusion criteria. All were observational and most (13) were prospective. Only three studies were performed in the United States and of those two were prospective. The largest study examined about 400 procedures and 13 studies examined less than 100 procedures. One case of inflammatory bowel disease and 67 duodenal or gastric ulcers were reported, thus diagnostic yield was achieved in 3.6% of cases. The prevalence of nonspecific histological gastrointestinal inflammatory lesions varied between 23% and 93%. Six articles attempted to correlate endoscopic or histologic findings with treatment management decisions. No articles attempted to describe quality of life or cost-effectiveness. None of the studies analyzed the association of alarm symptoms or signs to diagnostic yield. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnostic yield of EGD in children with unclear abdominal pain is low; however, existing studies are inadequate. The effect of EGD on change in treatment, quality of life, improvement of abdominal pain, and cost-effectiveness is unknown. The predictors of significant findings are unclear. Our findings suggest that a large multicenter study examining clinical factors, biopsy reports, and addressing patient outcomes is needed to further clarify the value of EGD in children with abdominal pain.     

The endoscopic appearance of duodenal folds is predictive of untreated adult celiac disease.

The loss of duodenal folds visible endoscopically has recently been reported as being a marker for celiac disease. We have investigated the sensitivity and specificity of this finding with a prospective study in 75 patients with symptoms or results of investigations compatible with celiac disease. Reported duodenal fold appearance was compared with histological findings, disaccharidase levels, and clinical diagnosis. Fifteen patients were found to have celiac disease and 11 had reduced or absent duodenal folds compared with only 2 of 60 patients who did not have celiac disease (p less than 0.0001). This finding has a sensitivity of 73%, specificity of 97%, and positive predictive value of 85%. Duodenal folds were not reported as being abnormal in seven patients with hypolactasia or two with giardiasis and did not appear to be influenced by age. A reduction in the number or height of duodenal folds as seen endoscopically in the second part of the duodenum is a specific and sensitive sign of celiac disease. Endoscopists should biopsy the duodenum for celiac disease whenever the duodenal folds appear to be reduced or absent.     

Intraepithelial Giardia Intestinalis: A Case Report and Literature Review

The giardiasis is a neglected parasitic disease. The WHO has estimated more than 280 million of human infections each year; however, intraepithelial giardiasis is a rare entity, there are only 5 reports showing invasive giardiasis.A pediatric female patient with chronic abdominal pain, diarrhea, or pasty stools, without fever, was seen in the Gastroenterology and Nutrition Service. The stool studies were negative for pathogens and lactose hydrogen breath test was positive. The presumptive clinical diagnosis was giardiasis and the patient was empirically treated with nitazoxanide. But, the patient persisted with abdominal pain and pasty stools.Endoscopy was indicated to search for Helicobacter and Giardia. Guardian and patient gave written informed consent. Hematological profile was normal. The endoscopy was performed under general anesthesia and the biopsies and duodenal aspirate were obtained. The microscopic analyses of duodenal fluid showed Giardia trophozoites. Electron microscopic analysis was negative for Helicobacter pylori, but Giardia trophozoites with a typical crescent shape within the tissue were found.The patient was treated with tinidazole, subsequent tests showed that lactose absorption was normal, stool examinations were negative for Giardia and abdominal pain had stopped.This case suggest that intraepithelial giardiasis could be a common entity but unseen because the giardiasis diagnosis is usually made on fecal samples. Future studies are necessary to determine the role of intraepithelial trophozoites in giardiasis pathogenic mechanisms     

Lack of endoscopic visualization of intestinal villi with the "immersion technique" in overt atrophic celiac disease

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic appearance of the duodenal folds can predict the presence of celiac disease. However, endoscopic alterations can be minimal and the disease can have a "patchy" distribution histopathologically. The observation that intestinal villi can be better visualized when the duodenum is filled with water led to the development of an endoscopic "immersion technique" to assess celiac disease. METHODS: Endoscopy with duodenal biopsies was performed in 20 patients with malabsorption syndrome (positive for antiendomysial antibodies) and in 30 patients with reflux-like symptoms (negative for antiendomysial antibodies). Duodenal hypotonia was induced pharmacologically, water was introduced, and the mucosa was observed for the presence of villi. Photographs were obtained for subsequent analysis. The endoscopic appearance was classified from 1 (folds certainly present) to 4 ("scalloped valvulae"); villous structures were classified from 1 (definitely present) to 3 (definitely absent). RESULTS: Celiac disease was confirmed histopathologically in all patients with positive antiendomysial antibodies. The endoscopic appearance of the duodenum with air insufflation alone had a positive predictive value for the diagnosis of celiac disease of 84% and a specificity of 87%. Visualization of villi with the "immersion technique" had a higher positive predictive value (99%) and specificity (99%). CONCLUSIONS: A lack of visualization of intestinal villi in the descending duodenum with the "immersion technique" may increase the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopy for celiac disease. This technique could also be useful for targeting duodenal biopsies.     

Gluten sensitivity and ‘normal’ histology: is the intestinal mucosa really normal?

BACKGROUND: Early pathogenetic events of gluten intolerance may be overlooked in patients with serologic markers of celiac disease and normal intestinal mucosa by both conventional histology and immunohistochemistry. AIMS: To investigate if a submicroscopical damage of the absorptive cell surface was associated with developing gluten sensitivity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Duodenal biopsies of seven subjects with positive anti-endomysial antibodies and normal histology underwent ultrastructural evaluation of the epithelial surface by means of both scanning and transmission electron microscopy. Specimens of intestinal mucosa of 14 children with non-celiac conditions were used as controls. RESULTS: In four patients, electron microscopy revealed alterations of the enterocyte brush border with a significant reduction of the height of microvilli. After several months, three of them had a second biopsy that eventually showed histological modifications suggestive of celiac disease. In the other three patients, no significant alteration of enterocyte ultrastructure was observed. One of them, rebiopsied after 12 months, still showed a normal duodenal histology. CONCLUSIONS: Gluten sensitivity can be associated with 'minimal' mucosal changes not detectable with conventional light microscopy. Such lesions, which primarily involve microvillous structure, may imply a reduction of intestinal absorptive surface already in the latent stage of the disease.     

Role of the "immersion technique" in diagnosing celiac disease with villous atrophy limited to the duodenal bulb

GOALS: To investigate if the so-called immersion technique during upper endoscopy may be helpful to predict patterns of villous atrophy restricted to the duodenal bulb. BACKGROUND: Patients with celiac disease may have a patchy distribution of duodenal villous atrophy. In some cases, mucosa of duodenal bulb may be the only intestinal area involved. The immersion technique is a novel procedure that allows visualizing duodenal villi directly during endoscopy. STUDY: With this prospective study, the immersion duodenoscopy was performed in 67 celiac subjects to investigate their duodenal villous pattern. Villi were evaluated both in the first and in the second duodenal segment and judged as present or absent (flat mucosa). Results were compared with histology as reference. RESULTS: Among celiac subjects, 49 were newly diagnosed and 18 previously diagnosed celiac patients. Four (8%) newly diagnosed and 7 (39%) previously diagnosed celiac subjects had an extension of the villous atrophy (flat mucosa) limited to the duodenal bulb. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of the immersion-based duodenal investigation in predicting areas of duodenal villous atrophy was always 100%. CONCLUSIONS: Immersion technique may be useful for directing duodenal biopsies in celiac subjects with a patchy distribution of villous atrophy. This procedure can avoid blinded sampling of the duodenal mucosa and enhance the diagnostic yield.     

Prevalence of celiac disease in adult patients with refractory functional dyspepsia： Value of routine duodenal biopsy

AIM： To investigate the prevalence of celiac disease （CD） in adult patients referred to an open access gastroenterology clinic in the south of Italy and submitted to esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy （EGD） for evaluation of refractory functional dyspepsia. METHODS： Seven hundred and twenty six consecutive dyspeptic patients （282 male, 444 female; mean age 39.6 years, range 18-75 years） with unexplained prolonged dyspepsia were prospectively enrolled. Duodenal biopsies were taken and processed by standard staining. Histological evaluation was carried out according to the Marsh-Oberhuber criteria. RESULTS： The endoscopic findings were： normal in 61.2%, peptic lesions in 20.5%, malignancies in 0.5%, miscellaneous in 16.7%. CD was endoscopically diagnosed in 8 patients （1.1%）, histologically in 15 patients （2%）. The endoscopic features alone showed a sensitivity of 34.8% and specificity of 100%, with a positive predictive value （PPV） of 100% and a negative predictive value （NPP） of 97.9%. CONCLUSION： This prospective study showed that CD has a high prevalence （1：48） in adult dyspeptic patients and suggests the routine use of duodenal biopsy in this type of patient undergoing EGD.     

In vitro production of endomysial antibodies in cultured duodenal mucosa from patients with celiac disease

OBJECTIVE: Endomysial antibodies (EMAs) had been found recently after in vitro gluten challenge of duodenal mucosa from treated celiac patients. This was a promising result for diagnosis of potential/latent celiac disease. Therefore, we tested the usefulness of the production of EMAs of in vitro-challenged mucosa for diagnosis of celiac disease and determined the location of EMA production. METHODS: We investigated EMAs in the serum, in the supernatants of in vitro gliadin-challenged duodenal mucosa specimens in 68 patients, and in homogenized native duodenal and gastric specimens in seven patients. Twenty-one of the 68 patients served as nonceliac controls, 11 as candidates for potential celiac disease, 23 celiac patients were on glutenfree diet, and 13 were newly diagnosed. RESULTS: EMAs were just found in the supernatants of duodenal biopsies of those celiac patients who had demonstrable EMAs in serum, independent of gliadin challenge. In these patients EMAs were also found in homogenized native duodenal biopsies, but not in gastric biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: EMAs seem to be produced in the small bowel mucosa of celiac patients, but not in other tissues such as gastric mucosa. The production of EMAs could not be initiated under standard in vitro conditions and therefore, such as in vitro challenge cannot be used for diagnostic purposes.     

Prevalence of Celiac Disease Among Patients with Behcet’s Disease in Iran

Background Behcet's disease and Celiac disease, both common in Iran, share many immunopathogenic and clinical features. Based on the possible association between these two diseases, this study is designed to determine the frequency of non-diagnosed celiac disease in patients with Behcet’s disease. Methods The sera of 288 consecutive patients with Behcet’s disease were screened with anti-endomysial antibody and anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody for celiac disease. Those with a positive test underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and duodenal biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of celiac disease. The patients with celiac disease were put on a gluten free diet to evaluate its efficacy on the improvement of their lesions. Results Fourteen patients had positive anti-tissue transglutaminase antibody test (two with positive anti-endomysial antibody as well). Duodenal biopsies showed findings compatible with Marsh 3 in one and Marsh 1 in three other patients. All the diagnosed patients with celiac disease responded to the gluten free diet. Conclusion Our findings didn’t support any association between celiac disease and Behcet’s disease in Iranian patients compared to the general population of Iran.     

Endoscopic features of celiac disease in children.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic abnormalities have been described in adult patients with celiac disease that may suggest the diagnosis, especially when the presentation is atypical. METHODS: The duodenum of 140 children undergoing EGD for various different indications was evaluated macroscopically and histologically. RESULTS: Histology revealed total villous atrophy in 80 patients, 79 of whom had celiac disease. Among these, 100% had a mucosal mosaic pattern in the duodenum (sensitivity 98.7%, specificity 96.7%, positive predictive value 97.5%, negative predictive value 98.3%), 70% had scalloped duodenal folds (sensitivity 68.7%, specificity 98.3%, positive predictive value 98.2%, negative predictive value 70.2%), 15% had visible vasculature, and 6% had reduction of duodenal folds. Sensitivity and specificity of endoscopic findings were not modified by chromoendoscopy. Except for the mosaic pattern, the frequency of endoscopic abnormalities increased with age; reduction of duodenal folds was never seen in children with celiac disease who were less than 5 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: The frequency and diagnostic value of endoscopic abnormalities are different in children with celiac disease compared with adults with this disease. Because indications for endoscopy, such as abdominal pain, dyspepsia, and unexplained anemia, can be manifestations of celiac disease, and villous atrophy may have a patchy distribution, awareness of these endoscopic abnormalities is important in the diagnosis of celiac disease in children.     

Risk of Duodenal Adenoma in Celiac Disease

Background: There is a 60- to 80-fold increased risk of small-bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with celiac disease. While the adenoma-carcinoma sequence appears to operate in the small bowel as in the large bowel, the risk of duodenal adenomas in celiac patients is unknown. Methods: The records of 381 patients (245 F, 136 M) with biopsy-proven celiac disease were reviewed to determine the prevalence of duodenal adenoma found during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We conducted an extensive literature review to find data for estimates of the prevalence of duodenal adenoma in a comparable general population; we used data from a study at another New York City medical center of 7346 EGDs conducted between 1976 and 1982 (Ghazi et al., 1984). We estimated the relative risk, expressed as a standard morbidity ratio (SMR), by calculating the observed to expected (O/E) ratio. Results: Duodenal adenomas were found in 3 celiac patients (0.78%), with 24 adenomas (0.33%) in the reference population, giving an SMR of 2.39 (95% CI 0.67-8.48). Conclusion: We did not find a significantly increased risk of duodenal adenoma in celiac patients compared to a non-celiac endoscoped population. Thus, despite the previously described elevated risk of small-bowel adenocarcinoma in these patients, routine endoscopic examination of the duodenum may not be adequate for screening.     

Risk of duodenal adenoma in celiac disease

BACKGROUND: There is a 60- to 80-fold increased risk of small-bowel adenocarcinoma in patients with celiac disease. While the adenoma-carcinoma sequence appears to operate in the small bowel as in the large bowel, the risk of duodenal adenomas in celiac patients is unknown. METHODS: The records of 381 patients (245 F, 136 M) with biopsy-proven celiac disease were reviewed to determine the prevalence of duodenal adenoma found during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD). We conducted an extensive literature review to find data for estimates of the prevalence of duodenal adenoma in a comparable general population; we used data from a study at another New York City medical center of 7346 EGDs conducted between 1976 and 1982 (Ghazi et al., 1984). We estimated the relative risk, expressed as a standard morbidity ratio (SMR), by calculating the observed to expected (O/E) ratio. RESULTS: Duodenal adenomas were found in 3 celiac patients (0.78%), with 24 adenomas (0.33%) in the reference population, giving an SMR of 2.39 (95% CI 0.67-8.48). CONCLUSION: We did not find a significantly increased risk of duodenal adenoma in celiac patients compared to a non-celiac endoscoped population. Thus, despite the previously described elevated risk of small-bowel adenocarcinoma in these patients, routine endoscopic examination of the duodenum may not be adequate for screening.