腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术单中心经验

目的 分析腔内治疗腹主动脉瘤的各项几何参数的分布规律,并探讨其远期疗效及术后常见并发症的防治方法.方法 回顾性分析入选2003年1月至2010年12月完成的344例肾下腹主动脉瘤腔内修复病例资料,对原始数据及随访结果做统计学分析及比较.结果 腹主动脉瘤近端瘤颈直径(23±3)mm,近端瘤颈长度(26±12) nun,与主动脉夹角(25±28)度.即刻技术成功率99.7％(343/344),随访率81.8％ (279/341),随访时间3～84个月,平均(33 ±15)个月.随访期间死亡率1.1％ (3/279),再次手术率10.4％ (29/279),总并发症发生率12.9％(36/279),包括内漏5.7％(16/279),支架移位1.1％(3/279),动脉瘤增大或破裂5.4％(15/279)等.统计结果显示近端瘤颈＞60度更易出现Ⅰ型内漏(P=0.010).结论 术前评估是腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗取得成功的首要因素.内漏是术后远期并发症的主要类型,且为再次手术的重要原因,影响患者的远期疗效,因此术后终身随访极为重要.     

Endovascular stent grafts as a safe secondary option for para-anastomotic abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our experience of endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysm. METHODS AND RESULTS: From March 2001 to December 2004 we identified 6 patients with a para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms following previous open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. All patients were treated with endovascular surgery under epidural anaesthesia. There were no major complications, surgical conversions or deaths. Four patients received a bifurcated aortic stent-graft, and two an aorto-uniliac stent-graft followed by a femoro-femoral bypass. At follow-up (mean 26.1+/-10.2 months) there were no deaths, endoleaks or graft migrations observed. CONCLUSION: Endovascular surgery, avoiding general anesthesia and re-laparotomy, is the ideal technique for treatment of this complication resulting from failed primary conventional AAA repair.     

Complications of aortic endografting

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been shown to have a significantly lower perioperative mortality rate compared with open repair. It has been a blessing for patients at high risk who were previously denied treatment for their aortic aneurysms. It does, however, have a substantial need for re-intervention for complications. Many of these complications including endoleak, endotension, migration, post implant syndrome and conversion to open repair are unique to endovascular aneurysm repair. Others including injury to the iliac arteries, graft limb thromboses and structural failure of prostheses occur with greater frequency in endovascular repair compared with open repair. It is important, therefore, for vascular surgeons to be aware of these complications including their prevention and appropriate that patients are informed of their incidence. This review discusses the local and vascular complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm with an emphasis on newer aspects.     

Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND: Para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries can occur years after aortic surgery and are at risk for rupture and erosion into surrounding structures. We report on our continued experience with patients who have been treated for these lesions with endovascular management as an alternative to traditional open repair. METHODS: Patients who underwent endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the distal aortic arch, descending thoracic aorta, abdominal aorta, or iliac arteries were prospectively followed up in a database. Patient comorbidities, initial aortic pathology, initial graft configuration, aneurysm characteristics, evidence of infection, type and configuration of endograft used, and follow-up were analyzed. RESULTS: From 1997 to 2006, 53 patients with 65 para-anastomotic aneurysms were treated with endovascular stent grafts. Patients who were originally treated for aortoiliac occlusive disease presented significantly later than those treated for aneurysmal disease (15.8 vs 8.9 years, P < .01) The initial technical success rate was 98%. Endoleaks were identified in six patients (11%) < or =1 month of surgery, and three required reintervention, including open conversions. Endoleak complications were significantly associated with patients who had symptomatic para-anastomotic aneurysms (P = .01). Perioperative mortality after endovascular repair was 3.8%. Overall mortality within a mean follow-up of 18 months was 49% and was significantly associated with older age at the time of endovascular treatment (P = .03). CONCLUSION: Endovascular repair of para-anastomotic aneurysms involving the aorta and iliac arteries is technically feasible and is associated with a low perioperative morbidity and mortality. Close follow-up is required to identify endoleaks. Long-term survival is limited in older patients. We recommend endovascular stent graft repair for para-anastomotic aneurysms in anatomically suitable patients.     

Lessons learned in adopting endovascular techniques for treating abdominal aortic aneurysm

HYPOTHESIS: Endovascular exclusion of abdominal aortic and common iliac aneurysms can be performed safely, and in the short term represents a feasible alternative to traditional, open aneurysm repair. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients were treated with endovascular grafts for 39 abdominal aortic and 2 common iliac artery aneurysms. RESULTS: All devices were successfully deployed. The size of the abdominal aortic aneurysms varied from 4.9 to 11.9 cm (average, 6.13 cm). The median procedure time was 195 minutes. There was one iliac artery rupture, which required celiotomy for repair. The hospital stay varied from 2 to 39 days (average, 6.7 days). The perioperative mortality rate was 2.4%. Sixteen patients (39%) had groin wound complications. Ten patients (24%) had evidence of contrast (endoleak) within the aneurysm sac on completion of the procedure. There were no obvious direct leaks from either the point of proximal or distal fixation. Seven of these endoleaks have resolved spontaneously. Two patients required additional procedures in the postoperative period to treat endoleak. The final patient has evidence of persistent endoleak on 3-month surveillance computed tomography scan. Major late problems occurred in 3 patients. CONCLUSION: Patients with large abdominal aortic aneurysms and considerable cardiac comorbidity can safely undergo endovascular aneurysm repair. Femoral groin wound complications resulting in prolonged hospitalization remain the major cause of perioperative morbidity. In contradistinction to open aneurysm repair, long-term surveillance is essential to detect migration of the device and identify flow within the residual aneurysm sac-complications that could lead to aneurysm rupture following endovascular repair.     

Aortoduodenal fistula and associated rupture of abdominal aortic aneurysm after endoluminal stent graft repair

The main complications of endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms are vascular leaks and rupture, although infection and aortoduodenal fistulas have also been reported rarely. We report a case of aortoduodenal fistula with separate retroperitoneal rupture of an abdominal aortic aneurysm after endovascular stent graft repair. The initial implantation was uneventful, without any leaks at 1 month. The patient underwent open repair and did well. To our knowledge, this is the first case report of aortoduodenal fistula and associated retroperitoneal rupture of the aneurysm after endovascular stent graft repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm.     

Endovaskuläre Therapie des infrarenalen Bauchaortenaneurysmas mit aortokavaler Fistel

An aortocaval fistula is a rare complication of a symptomatic or ruptured infrarenal aortic aneurysm having a frequency of 3–6%. Patients typically present with clinical signs of diffuse abdominal pain associated with increasing venous congestion and tachycardia, rapid cardiopulmonary decompensation with acute dyspnea and an audible machinery-like bruit. Frequently, the diagnosis is obtained only during open aneurysm repair. Perioperative mortality is high, ranging from 20% to 60%. We report our experience with endovascular aortic repair in patients with symptomatic infrarenal aortic aneurysms and aortocaval fistula, and review the literature. Endovascular stent graft implantation seems to be a promising new treatment option for patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms, rupture into the inferior vena cava, and aortoiliac configurations acceptable for endovascular therapy.     

Endovascular graft limb occlusion

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) has undergone a tremendous evolution in the nearly 15 years since it was first described. Continual refinement of the technology and techniques associated with EVAR and the respectable short-term results of this procedure led the United States Food and Drug Administration to approve several devices for the endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). There has been a corresponding rapid dissemination of this technology throughout the vascular surgery community in the United States. Availability and critical analysis of mid- and long-term follow-up data on the increasing number of patients who have undergone EVAR has begun to raise questions about the long-term durability and effectiveness of EVAR. Numerous complications of EVAR are now recognized and well described in the literature. One of these is graft limb dysfunction. Graft limb occlusion occurs in a significant number of patients and it is imperative that physicians who perform EVAR have a thorough understanding of this condition. There are a variety of factors that predispose patients to development of graft limb occlusion. These factors can be classified as either anatomic or graft-related. When patients present with graft limb occlusion, endovascular treatment is usually possible and it is highly effective. Some cases require traditional surgical treatment. Prevention of graft limb occlusion is of paramount importance. It can only be achieved with an aggressive search for graft limb compromise and liberal use of angioplasty and/or stenting at the time of graft implantation.     

肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后并发症的防治

目的　总结肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤腔内治疗后常见并发症的预防与处理。　方法对已施行腔内治疗的 71例肾下腹主动脉瘤患者的临床资料进行回顾性分析 ,讨论常见并发症发生的原因、处理、结果及预后。　结果　 71例接受腔内治疗的肾动脉下腹主动脉瘤患者技术成功率1 0 0 % ,无中转开腹手术者。原发性内漏 8例 ,神经并发症合并急性血栓形成 1例。一过性缺血性肠炎 2例。无肾动脉梗死、肢体栓塞等并发症。平均随访时间 (2 6± 5)个月。围手术期病死率 1 3 % (1 /71 ) ,总病死率 4 2 % (3/ 71 )。死亡原因 2例为急性心肌梗死 ,1例为急性心功能衰竭。随访过程中发现 3例原发性内漏转为持续性内漏 ,另发现继发性内漏 4例。本组患者 1个月后内漏发生率 9 8%(7/ 71 )。 2例继发性Ⅰ型内漏随访中瘤体增大 ,1例进行二期腔内治疗。　结论　动脉瘤的腔内治疗具有创伤小、技术操作可行、效果肯定的优点 ,内漏血是该技术主要并发症。对漏血量及瘤体有增大趋势的内漏应积极处理     

高危复杂腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术临床分析

目的 评估应用多种腔内技术治疗高危复杂腹主动脉瘤的可行性.方法 2001年1月至2010年12月,共138例腹主动脉瘤患者接受腹主动脉腔内修复术(EVAR),其中9例患者为高危复杂性腹主动脉瘤.男性8例,女性1例,年龄26～87岁,平均67岁.其中2例近肾腹主动脉假性动脉瘤,5例近肾腹主动脉瘤,1例腹主动脉瘤合并双髂总动脉瘤及左侧髂内动脉瘤,1例EVAR术后右髂内动脉瘤.所采用的腔内技术包括:主动脉支架开窗技术和扇形技术2例,烟囱技术5例,球囊辅助下髂内动脉瘤腔内治疗1例和球囊辅助反转支架技术1例.结果 所有腔内技术均获得成功.术中支架释放后即刻发现内漏4例,其中1例患者为Ⅰ型和Ⅲ型内漏,经大动脉球囊扩张后内漏消失;2例Ⅰ型内漏,其中1例行弹簧栓栓塞成功,另1例行近端裸支架成功.1例Ⅱ型内漏,经随访瘤腔直径未增大,未处理.随访4～79个月,平均25.9个月.无动脉瘤破裂,动脉瘤瘤体直径均有不同程度的缩小.随访过程中7例患者的靶血管(肾动脉、肠系膜上动脉和髂内动脉)均保持通畅.1例髂内动脉重建支架术后18个月血栓形成,但无盆腔缺血等症状.结论 对于不能耐受手术的高危复杂腹主动脉瘤患者,选择合适的腔内技术可以增加EVAR术的成功率,近、中期效果满意.     

“ENGAGE”治疗腹主动脉瘤8年随访数据解读及展望

腹主动脉瘤（AAA）是一种永久且不可逆的腹主动脉局部扩张性病变，其破裂病死率高达60%~70%。AAA腔内修复术凭借其临床安全性和有效性已经成为AAA的一线治疗方法，但其长期随访中的支架移位、内漏等并发症仍值得关注。“ENGAGE”是迄今最大的AAA腔内治疗的长期注册研究，笔者基于“ENGAGE”研究8年随访结果和相应的文献分析，系统介绍AAA腔内治疗现状及前景。     

Endovascular treatment for para-anastomotic abdominal aortic and iliac aneurysms following aortic surgery

AIM: The aim of this study was to report our experience with endovascular repair of anastomotic aneurysms occurring after graft replacement for abdominal aortic aneurysms or aorto-iliac obstructive disease. METHODS: Between January 2000 and April 2006, 19 consecutive male patients (median age 73 years) underwent endovascular repair for 22 anastomotic aneurysms [proximal aortic (n=15), iliac (n=4), concomitant aortic and iliac (n=3)], occurring 3 months to 18 years (mean 8.6 years) after open surgery. Three patients (15.7%) underwent emergency treatment for rupture. No patient had symptoms or positive blood tests for infection of the original graft. Twelve patients were treated with a bifurcated stent-graft, 4 patients with a proximal stent-graft cuff, 2 patients with a tube iliac stent-graft, and 1 patient with a mono-iliac stent-graft. RESULTS: Stent-grafts were successfully deployed in all patients. Procedure-related complications or death were not observed; open conversion was never required. Median hospitalisation was 9 days (range 3-45). During a median follow-up of 16 Euro-months (range, 2-44) all anastomotic aneurysms maintained excluded: 4 patients (21%) died. We observed 1 major complication (5.2%): an iliac branch occlusion occurred 1 month after the procedure, successfully treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis. Overall, survival rates at 6, 12, 18 and 36-months were 92.8%, 84.4%, 72.3%, and 57.8% respectively. CONCLUSION: Our experience confirms that endovascular stent-grafts can be used successfully to exclude anastomotic aortic aneurysms after open surgery. Endovascular repair seems to be effective at mid-term follow-up.     

Long-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm treatment with the first generation of commercially available stent grafts

HYPOTHESIS: Little information about the long-term results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is available. This study was performed to evaluate the long-term data of patients treated with the first generation of commercially available stent grafts. DESIGN: Multicenter registry. SETTING: Sixty-two European centers that participated in the EUROSTAR (EUROpean collaborators on Stent-graft Techniques for abdominal aortic Aneurysm Repair) registry. PATIENTS: A total of 1190 patients with a follow-up of up to 8 years, who underwent endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair with a stent graft (Stentor or Vanguard). INTERVENTION: Elective endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The morbidity and mortality data of patients treated with the first-generation stent graft who enrolled in the EUROSTAR registry were analyzed. Incidence rates of complications were calculated to quantify annual risks. Life-table analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for the survival analysis. RESULTS: Conversion to open repair, aneurysm rupture, all-cause death, and aneurysm-related death occurred in 7.1%, 2.4%, 19.9%, and 3.0% of the patients, respectively. The cumulative percentage of the combined outcome event, conversion-free and rupture-free survival, after 8 years was 48.0%. Procedure-related complications that frequently occurred were endoleak (13.0 cases per 100 patient-years), stenosis/thrombosis (4.6 cases per 100 patient-years), and stent migration (4.3 cases per 100 patient-years). CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with the first generation of stent grafts will need lifelong surveillance because of a considerable risk of late complications. How these findings translate to the outcome of newer-generation stent grafts is unknown. For this reason, vigilant surveillance remains indicated in all patients who undergo endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.     

Endovascular aortic grafting: current status

Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms was first reported in 1991. Since then there has been widespread development of many stent-grafts for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Available data support the proposition that stent-grafts are generally safe, although their long-term efficacy remains completely unknown. Importantly, endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair to date does not have fewer complications nor lower mortality rates than open repair; in fact, the opposite appears true. Along with most new techniques come new complications, and endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has brought forth the concepts of both `endoleak' and device failure. While uncommon, delayed abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture following seemingly successful endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has been reported. In our opinion, these faults, unique to endovascular repair, mandate a cautious approach to the clinical application of stent-grafts. Until ongoing Phase 2 and future Phase 3 studies are completed with a minimum of 2–3 years follow-up, we will not know if endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm represents a giant step forward or merely an industry-driven overuse of proprietary technology.     

Endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm has become widely used. Supporters claim high success rates, few complications and a dramatically reduced hospital stay. However, endoleak, endotension and reports of endoprosthesis rupture are causes of concern. METHODS: A Medline search was undertaken to identify articles on endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Additional papers were identified by manual scanning of the references from key articles. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Endoleak is a potentially serious complication of the endovascular technique and occurs in a significant proportion of patients. It is still not possible to judge whether the presence of an endoleak alone signifies failure of treatment, and the long-term durability of prosthetic covered stents is unknown. However, endovascular repair does appear to confer a degree of protection from rupture although patients must be advised of the need for life-long imaging surveillance and, perhaps, further intervention.     

Aortoenteric fistula: a late complication of endovascular repair of an inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm

Endovascular repair provides a reasonable alternative to open repair for the treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysms in select cases. Although the endovascular approach may be preferable for inflammatory aneurysms, aggressive surveillance is needed to monitor for long-term complications. A 61-year-old man underwent endovascular exclusion of a symptomatic inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm with an AneuRx bifurcated aortic prosthesis. He presented with gastrointestinal bleeding 51/2 months later and was found to have an aortoenteric fistula involving the third portion of the duodenum. The aneurysm had expanded significantly at the proximal neck. The patient underwent successful removal of the device, aortic ligation, and extraanatomic bypass. Aortoenteric fistula is a rare but now established complication of endovascular aneurysm repair. The pathophysiology in these cases remains unclear. The presence of inflammation and endoleak may predispose to further aneurysmal degeneration.     

����������ǻ������84������

??Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: an analysis of 84 cases LIU Chang-wei, LIU Bao, WU Wei-wei??et al. Department of Vascular Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China Corresponding author??LIU Chang-wei, E-mail??liucw@vip.sina.com Abstract Objective To summarize experiences of endovascular treatment on 84 patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. Methods From September 2001 to December 2008, 84 cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm were treated with endovascular repair in Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Results Eighty-four cases of abdominal aortic aneurysm were performed endovascular repair successfully??include 8 emergency procedures??. Seventy-seven bifurcated stent grafts and 7 tubular stent grafts, including two fenestrated stent grafts, were deployed. Two cases died within 30 days after the procedures. Among them, one died of acute myocardial infarction and another died of septic shock. Conclusion Endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm is safe and feasible. The indications of endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms, skills of interventional procedure, management of complications and treatment of concomitant disease are the key factors of successful operation.     

Endovascular Graft Limb Occlusion After an Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: Report of a Case

An endovascular aneurysm repair has become an important therapeutic option for the management of patients with aortic aneurysms. Early advantages of the endovascular technique have been well documented. Patients with aortic aneurysms undergoing these procedures are usually elderly, which increases the likelihood of comorbidities. With the increased use of vascular devices, potential complications such as graft limb occlusion need to be widely understood, so they can be recognized and treated early. We recently treated an 85-year-old man with acute endovascular graft limb occlusion after an elective anterior resection for rectal cancer, and we discuss some factors that may have contributed to this complication.     

近肾腹主动脉瘤的腔内治疗技术进展

腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术目前已成为大部分肾下型腹主动脉瘤患者的首选治疗,但对于近端瘤颈较短的近肾腹主动脉瘤,需要涉及内脏分支重建,常规的腹主动脉瘤腔内修复术疗效并不满意。近年来,烟囱支架技术、开窗支架技术、分支支架技术、八爪鱼技术等创新性技术的使用为近肾腹主动脉瘤患者的腔内治疗提供了多种解决方案,本文回顾并总结当前腔内治疗技术的进展,以期对目前各种技术的应用难点加以分析思考。     

Infected aortic aneurysms: aggressive presentation, complicated early outcome, but durable results.

OBJECTIVE: Infected aortic aneurysms are rare, difficult to treat, and associated with significant morbidity. The purpose of this study was to review the management and results of patients with infected aortic aneurysms and identify clinical variables associated with poor outcome. METHODS: The clinical data and early and late outcomes of 43 patients treated for infected aortic aneurysms during a 25-year period (1976-2000) were reviewed. Variables were correlated with risk of aneurysm-related death and vascular complications, defined as organ or limb ischemia, graft infection or occlusion, and anastomotic or recurrent aneurysm. RESULTS: Infected aneurysms were infrarenal in only 40% of cases. Seventy percent of patients were immunocompromised hosts. Ninety-three percent had symptoms, and 53% had ruptured aneurysms. Surgical treatment was in situ aortic grafting (35) and extra-anatomic bypass (6). Operative mortality was 21% (9/42). Early vascular complications included ischemic colitis (3), anastomotic disruption (1), peripheral embolism (1), paraplegia (1), and monoparesis (1). Late vascular complications included graft infection (2), recurrent aneurysm (2), limb ischemia (1), and limb occlusion (1). Mean follow-up was 4.3 years. Cumulative survival rates at 1 year and 5 years were 82% and 50%, respectively, significantly lower than survival rates for the general population (96% and 81%) and for the noninfected aortic aneurysm cohort (91% and 69%) at same intervals. Rate of survival free of late graft-related complications was 90% at 1 year and 5 years, similar to that reported for patients who had repair of noninfected abdominal aortic aneurysms (97% and 92%). Variables associated with increased risk of aneurysm-related death included extensive periaortic infection, female sex, Staphylococcus aureus infection, aneurysm rupture, and suprarenal aneurysm location (P <.05). For risk of vascular complications, extensive periaortic infection, female sex, leukocytosis, and hemodynamic instability were positively associated (P <.05). CONCLUSION: Infected aortic aneurysms have an aggressive presentation and a complicated early outcome. However, late outcome is surprisingly favorable, with no aneurysm-related deaths and a low graft-related complication rate, similar to standard aneurysm repair. In situ aortic grafting is a safe and durable option in most patients.