巨大腹壁切口疝的补片修补治疗(附23例报告)

目的：总结临床治疗巨大腹壁切口疝的经验和方法。方法：回顾性分析23例巨大腹壁切口疝病人的年龄，手术方法，引流放置，抗生素应用及预后。结果：发生巨大腹壁切口疝平均年龄是65．3％，均采用人工合成材料进行修补，术后放置引流，并使用预防性抗生素。治愈21例，复发2例。结论：常见于老年病人腹部手术后巨大腹壁切口疝，可使用人工合成材料进行修补，并获得良好疗效。     

应用补片治疗腹壁巨大切口疝(附27例报告)

切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症之一，其发生率为2％-11％。而疝环最大距离≥10cm的腹壁巨大切口疝(abdominal giant incisional hernia，AGIH)治疗棘手，复发率高，对机体影响严重，常给病人造成极大痛苦与不便。我院自1998年4月至2003年4月诊治AGIH共27例．治疗效果满意，现报告如下。     

应用补片治疗腹壁巨大切口疝19例报告

腹壁切口疝是腹部手术后常见的并发症,传统的修补方法复发率高达30%~50%。尤其是腹壁巨大切口疝,患者痛苦大,治疗棘手。我院2001年1月至2005年12月实施无张力人工材料疝修补术治疗腹壁巨大切口疝19例,现报告如下。临床资料1.一般资料:本组19例,男6例,女13例。年龄37~78岁,平均61岁。疝环直径10~16.5cm,平均13.2cm。初次切口疝15例,复发疝4例。2.材料:美国强生公司提供的聚丙烯单丝编织的不可吸收材料,网片规格15cm×15cm,30cm×30cm等。3.手术方法:均采用连续硬膜外麻醉,使腹壁肌肉完全松弛。原手术切口入路,切除切口瘢痕。充分游离皮下组织…     

人工补片修补腹壁切口疝35例临床疗效分析

目的:探讨利用人工材料修补腹壁切口疝的疗效.方法:回顾性分析我院2000～2008年间收治的35例病人的临床资料.结果:所有病例均采用人工补片行切口疝无张力修补术,均痊愈出院,无严重并发症.随访6～60个月,平均28个月,无复发,疗效满意.结论:应用人工补片行腹壁切口疝修补术是一种安全、合理、疗效确切的治疗方法,也是治疗该病的发展方向.     

巴德补片修补腹壁切口疝的应用与护理

采用人工合成材料行无张力疝修术是我国近几年来发展起来的一种有效治疗方法。我科自2001年元月-2004年12月对24例腹壁切口疝采用巴德补片行疝修补术,取得满意效果。现将有关护理报告如下:1临床资料1.1一般资料:本组24例中,男性10例,女性14例,年龄在57~77岁,平均年龄67岁。前次手术方法如下:上腹部手术7例(胆道手术5例,脾切除1例,肝右叶切除1例)。下腹部手术17例(子宫切除术5例,前列腺摘除1例,肠切肠吻合术4例,膀胱部分切除术1例,剖腹探查术2例,阑尾切除术4例);复发性疝6例,其中3例为2次手术失败复发。复发时间:最短为3个月,最长11年。1.2治…     

开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝补片修补术

目的探讨腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝治疗经验。方法对我院采用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术的51例患者临床资料进行回顾性分析。结果采用肌前补片修补法3例,肌肉间补片修补法3例,肌后腹膜前补片修补法39例,腹腔内补片修补法6例。手术时间109~195 min,平均135.2 min;术中出血15~90 ml,平均35.6 ml;术中无血管和内脏损伤等并发症。术后3~7 d(平均4.9 d)下床活动;住院时间7~19 d,平均9.7 d。2例患者术后出现浆液肿,经穿刺抽吸、负压吸引和腹带加压包扎后治愈。51例患者随访12~36个月(平均24.5个月),3例(5.9%)患者复发,后行开放式腹腔内补片修补手术,恢复良好,无再复发。所有病例无慢性疼痛。结论应用补片行开放式腹壁大切口疝和巨大切口疝修补术是一种安全、可靠的方法,复发率低。     

开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝（附210例报告）

目的 分析开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝的临床疗效。方法 回顾性分析我院于2013年10月至2018年3月行开放式补片修补术的210例腹壁切口疝病人的临床资料。分析不同术式和补片固定方式,术后血清肿、切口感染、补片感染、慢性疼痛、肠漏、复发以及死亡的发生。结果 术后血清肿25例（11.90%）,切口感染14例（6.67%）,补片感染3例（1.43%）,慢性疼痛7例（3.33%）,肠漏3例（1.43%）,复发7例（3.33%）,死亡2例（0.95%）。采用IPOM术式病人术后仅有血清肿并发症发生率低于Sublay术（P<0.05）,差异有统计学意义,其余并发症发生和复发率差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。Sublay术式中加强法与桥接法术后并发症差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。采用缝线+不可吸收疝钉组与缝线+可吸收疝钉组术后慢性疼痛和复发率无统计学差异（P>0.05）。结论 开放式补片修补术治疗腹壁切口疝安全有效。     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝四例

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见的并发症,疝修补手术的难度、并发症和复发率都较高[1-2]。我科对4例腹壁切口疝患者采用复合型补片行腹腔内无张力修补术。     

复合补片修补腹壁切口疝

腹壁切口疝是腹部外科手术后常见的并发症。据报道,腹部手术后腹壁切口疝的发生率为11％～20％。单纯直接缝合修补腹壁切口疝的术后复发率可高达50％左右,故应用合成材料修补腹壁切口疝,特别是用于修补腹壁巨大切口疝已成为共识。修补材料有多种,聚脂材料因较多并发症而逐渐被淘汰。目前应用较多的是聚丙烯和聚四氟乙烯(polytetrafluoroethylene,PTFE)材料,前者因易与腹腔内肠管粘连,     

自体腹壁真皮片修补腹壁巨大切口疝

我院自 1980～ 2 0 0 1年采用自体腹壁真皮片修补腹壁巨大切口疝 (大于 10ｃｍ) 2 9例 ,效果满意。现报告如下。临床资料1.一般资料 :本组 2 9例 ,男 9例 ,女 2 0例。年龄 44～79岁 ,平均年龄 6 2 7岁。 1次腹部手术史 8例 ,2次腹部手术史 18例 ,3次腹部手术史 2例 ,4次腹部手术史 1例 ;疝环最大 2 2ｃｍ× 13ｃｍ ,最小 10ｃｍ× 7 5ｃｍ。2 手术方法 :有效麻醉使腹壁肌肉充分松弛 ,龙胆紫将疝环以虚线标出 ,捏起松弛皮肤估计皮肤切除范围 ,以修补缝合时无张力为准并以龙胆紫实线标出 ;依实线以缺损为中心做梭形切口至深筋膜。巨大切口疝…     

Risk Factors for Incarceration in Patients with Primary Abdominal Wall and Incisional Hernias: A Prospective Study in 4472 Patients

Background

Incarceration of primary and incisional hernias often results in emergency surgery. The objective of this study was to evaluate the relation of defect size and location with incarceration. Secondary objectives comprised identification of additional patient factors associated with an incarcerated hernia.

Methods

A registry-based prospective study was performed of all consecutive patients undergoing hernia surgery between September 2011 and February 2016. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors for incarceration.

Results

In total, 83 (3.5%) of 2352 primary hernias and 79 (3.7%) of 2120 incisional hernias had a non-reducible incarceration. For primary hernias, a defect width of 3–4 cm compared to defects of 0–1 cm was significantly associated with an incarcerated hernia (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.57–5.18, p = 0.0006). For incisional hernias, a defect width of 3–4 cm compared to defects of 0–2 cm was significantly associated with an incarceration (OR 2.14, 95% CI 1.07–4.31, p = 0.0324). For primary hernias, defects in the peri- and infra-umbilical region portrayed a significantly increased odds for incarceration as compared to supra-umbilical defects (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.02–3.85, p = 0.043). Additionally, in primary hernias age, BMI, and constipation were associated with incarceration. In incisional hernias age, BMI, female sex, diabetes mellitus and ASA classification were associated with incarceration.

Conclusion

For primary and incisional hernias, mainly defects of 3–4 cm were associated with incarceration. For primary hernias, mainly defects located in the peri- and infra-umbilical region were associated with incarceration. Based on patient and hernia characteristics, patients with increased odds for incarceration may be selected and these patients may benefit from elective surgical treatment.

     

Concurrent Gastric Bypass and Repair of Anterior Abdominal Wall Hernias

Background: Many patients seeking surgical treatment for morbid obesity present with anterior abdominal wall hernias. Although principles of hernia repair involve a tension-free repair with the use of prosthetic mesh, there is concern about the use of mesh in gastric bypass surgery due to potential contamination with the contents of the gastrointestinal tract and resultant mesh infection. We report our series of patients undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and simultaneous anterior abdominal wall hernia repair. Methods: All patients who underwent simultaneous RYGBP surgery and anterior abdominal wall hernia repair were reviewed. Results: 12 patients underwent concurrent RYGBP and anterior wall hernia repair. There were 5 women and 7 men with average age 54.9 ± 8.5 years (range 35 to 64) and average body mass index (BMI) 50.4 ± 10.3 kg/m² (range 38 to 70). Two open and 10 laparoscopic RYGBP operations were performed. Nine patients (75%) underwent incisional hernia repairs and 3 patients (25%) underwent umbilical hernia repair concurrent with gastric bypass. Average size of defect was 14.7 ± 13.4 cm². One patient had primary repair and 11 patients had prosthetic mesh repair: polypropylene in 3 patients (25%) and polyester in 8 patients (67%). With a 14.1 ± 9.3 month follow-up, there have been no mesh infections and 2 recurrences, one in the patient who underwent primary repair and one in a patient repaired with polyester mesh but with two previous failed incisional hernia repairs. Conclusion: Concurrent RYGBP and repair of anterior abdominal wall hernias is safe and feasible. In order to optimize success, tension-free principles of hernia repair with the use of prosthetic mesh should be followed since no mesh infections occurred in our series.     

Safety and Efficacy of Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Abdominal Wall Hernias

Background:

Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery has rapidly progressed from the animal laboratory to clinical use since mass production of multichannel ports began in 2007. Indeed, it has now been shown to be feasible and safe for many commonly performed operations.

Methods:

This study cohort comprised 22 unselected patients with abdominal wall hernias of varying types: multiply recurrent inguinal (n=2), suprapubic (n=1), ventral/incisional (n=17), and parastomal hernias (n=2), who underwent laparoendoscopic single-site ventral hernia repair between December 2009 and February 2011. Standard dissecting instruments and a 52cm/5.5mm/30^°angle laparoscope were used.

Results:

Patients included 14 men and 8 women, with a median age of 56 (range, 32 to 78) years and a mean body mass index of 31.5±4.7kg/m². The mean mesh size was 460cm² (range, 225 to 884cm²). Mean operation time was 125 minutes for ventral/incisional hernias and 270 minutes for parastomal hernias. No conversions to multiport or open surgeries were necessary. There was no mortality or morbidity, and no recurrence at 6- to 18-month follow-up. The mean satisfaction score was 2.7 (range, 2 to 3) with no patients reporting dissatisfaction with the procedure.

Conclusion:

This series, though relatively small, represents a diverse group of patients with varying abdominal wall hernias, including parastomal hernias. These successful laparoendoscopic single-site surgeries, with no complications, demonstrate safety and efficacy, albeit in a specialized hernia center. This study is a prelude to the eventual validation of laparoendoscopic single-site hernia surgery with prospective randomized controlled trials.     

腹壁疝发生和复发的生化因素

腹壁疝是普外科最常见的疾病之一。然而，有关其发生和修补术后复发的明确病因仍未完全明了。目前的研究表明，间质结缔组织特别是胶原的代谢异常与疝的发生和复发密切相关。疝与结缔组织异常性疾病的关系腹股沟疝在一些先天性结缔组织异常的疾病中发病率较高，如成骨不全、皮肤松弛、埃勒斯鄄当洛斯（Ehlers鄄Danlos）综合征、胡尔勒鄄亨特(Hurler鄄Hunter)综合征和马凡（Marfans）综合征等。在患有先天性髋关节脱位的儿童中，腹股沟疝的发病率分别高于正常男女儿童的５倍和３倍。另外，腹股沟斜疝病人容易合并关节活动过度，这部分病人…     

创伤性腹壁疝的临床特点与手术时机的选择

本文总结我院1992年至1996年收治的创伤性腹壁疝5例，就其临床特点与手术修补的时机选择作一探讨。临床资料1.一般资料创伤性腹壁疝5例，均为青壮年男性，年龄23～44岁，平均32.8岁。病因均为前腹壁遭受钝性暴力所致，具体为板车把、钢筋木棍捅伤、塌方挤压伤和车撞伤。疝的部位分别位于左上腹、左侧腹、左下腹、右上腹和右侧腹。2.诊断与治疗5例均为伤后24h内急诊入院。于受伤之腹壁处均可见皮肤隆起并可触及腹壁缺损，直径分别为3～6cm。5例中4例生命体征平稳，无腹膜炎表现，其中2例虽然腹穿抽到少许不凝血，但经观察均排除了内脏损伤，…     

Impact of Abdominal Wall Hernias and Repair on Patient Quality of Life

Background

The modified Activities Assessment Scale (AAS) is a 13-question abdominal wall quality of life (AW-QOL) survey validated in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair (VHR). No studies have assessed AW-QOL among individuals without abdominal wall pathology. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of the modified AAS and its implications for the threshold at which VHR should be offered also remain unknown. Our objectives were to (1) establish the AW-QOL of patients with a clinical abdominal wall hernia versus those with no hernia, (2) determine the MCID of the modified AAS, and (3) identify the baseline quality of life (QOL) score at which patients derive little clinical benefit from VHR.

Methods

Patient-centered outcomes data for all patients presenting to General Surgery and Hernia Clinics October–December 2016 at a single safety-net institution were collected via a prospective, cross-sectional observational study design. Primary outcome was QOL measured using the modified AAS. Secondary outcome was the MCID.

Results

Patients with no hernia had modified AAS scores of 81.6 (50.4–94.4), while patients with a clinically apparent hernia had lower modified AAS scores of 31.4 (12.6–58.7) (p < 0.001). The MCID threshold was 7.6 for a “slight” change and 14.9 for “definite” change. Above a modified AAS score of 81, the risk of worsening a patient’s QOL by surgery is higher than the chances of improvement.

Conclusions

VHR can improve 1-year postsurgical AW-QOL to levels similar to that of the general population. The MCID of the modified AAS is 7.6 points. Patients with high baseline scores should be counseled about the lack of potential benefit in QOL from elective VHR.