Role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in characterization of focal liver lesions

Aim

The purpose of the study was to describe the enhancement patterns of focal liver lesions (FLLs) on contrast enhanced sonography (CEUS), assessing the potential of this technique for characterizing the lesions and to compare its diagnostic accuracy with conventional baseline sonography including color Doppler.

Materials and methods

Between August 2009 and July 2010, 50 patients with FLLs underwent gray scale sonography, color Doppler and CEUS. The enhancement patterns of these FLL’s were analyzed throughout the arterial phase, the portal venous phase and the extended portal venous phase (the late parenchymal phase). The final diagnosis was established on the basis of histopathologic examination or CT/MRI imaging.

Results

Out of these 50 FLLs, 33 were malignant (4 hepatocellular carcinoma and 29 metastasis) and 17 were benign (5 hemangioma, 5 abscess, 2 cyst and 1 each of FNH, focal fat sparing area, focal fatty infiltration, adenoma and benign/granulomatous lesion). The enhancement patterns after injecting microbubble contrast agent allowed characterization of FLLs. The malignant lesions showed intratumoral and/or peritumoral vascularity during the arterial phase and perfusion defect during the late parenchymal phase. Contrast enhanced sonography improved sensitivity in detecting malignancy (CEUS vs. baseline sonography, 100% vs. 81.8%).

Conclusion

CEUS improves detection and characterization of FLLs. It should be used as problem solving tool in cases where conventional gray scale and color Doppler sonography are non-diagnostic.     

Detection of focal liver lesions in cirrhotic liver using contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Patients with liver cirrhosis are at increased risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Conventional or baseline ultrasound (BUS) is often used as the first-line tool for HCC surveillance or detection, but the accuracy of BUS in HCC detection or differentiation from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) is limited. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) represents a recent revolution in the field of ultrasonography and it has become increasingly important in the detection and evaluation of FLLs. In CEUS, HCC typically exhibits arterial hyper-enhancement and portal-venous washout represented by hypo-enhanced lesions in the portal venous and late phases. The detection rate of HCC was significantly higher with CEUS compared with BUS. Even regenerative or some dysplastic nodules may exhibit arterial hyper-enhancement as they are differentiated from HCC by its iso-enhancing pattern in portal and late phases. The contrast-enhancement patterns of other different types of benign and malignant FLLs, as well as their detection rates with CEUS, were also discussed.     

Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for complex cystic focal liver lesions: blinded reader study

The study was aimed at evaluating the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in characterizing complex cystic focal liver lesions (FLLs). Sixty-seven complex cystic FLLs in 65 patients were examined with conventional ultrasound (US) and real-time CEUS. The US and CEUS images were reviewed by a resident radiologist and a staff radiologist independently. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance, and the interobserver agreement was analysed. The results showed that complete non-enhancement throughout three phases of CEUS or sustained enhancement in the portal and late phases were exhibited in most benign lesions. Conversely, hypo-enhancement in the late phase was seen in all malignancies. After ROC analysis, the areas (Az) under the ROC curve were 0.774 at US versus 0.922 at CEUS (P = 0.047) by the resident radiologist, and 0.917 versus 0.935 (P = 0.38) by the staff radiologist. A significant difference in Az between the resident and the staff radiologists was found for US (0.774 versus 0.917, P = 0.044), whereas not found for CEUS (0.922 versus 0.935, P = 0.42). Interobserver agreement was improved after CEUS (κ = 0.325 at US versus κ = 0.774 at CEUS). Real-time CEUS improves the capability of discrimination between benign and malignant complex cystic FLLs, especially for the resident radiologist.     

The real capabilities of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the characterization of solid focal liver lesions

Contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) using intravenous agents is a rapidly evolving field even though the main clinically recognized application is the characterization of focal liver lesions. Several reports have described the improvement provided by CEUS in the characterization of focal liver lesions in comparison to unenhanced US. CEUS with low transmit power insonation allows the real-time assessment of focal liver lesion contrast enhancement and vascularity during the different dynamic phases after injection of an intravenous contrast agent. CEUS allows the accurate characterization of focal liver lesions as benign or malignant based on the lesion contrast enhancement pattern during the arterial phase and lesion vascularity during portal--late phase in comparison to the adjacent liver parenchyma. During the portal--late phase, benign lesions present prevalently a sustained contrast enhancement with hyper or isovascular appearance to the adjacent liver while malignant lesions present prevalently microbubble washout with hypovascular appearance. On the other hand, the histology of focal liver lesions can only be confidently predicted in selected cases by CEUS, as in liver haemangiomas presenting typical nodular peripheral enhancement with subsequent centripetal fill-in and focal nodular hyperplasia with central spoke wheel-shaped contrast enhancement.     

Characterization of focal liver lesions with a new ultrasound contrast agent using continuous low acoustic power imaging: comparison with contrast enhanced spiral CT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the concordance of the enhancement patterns of a new ultrasound contrast agent (SonoVue) with those obtained with dual-phase contrast-enhanced spiral CT (CE-CT) in the characterization of focal liver lesions (FLLs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-two patients with focal liver lesions discovered at ultrasound and also studied with CECT underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound using continuous low acoustic power imaging after receiving a 2.4 ml bolus of the new US contrast agent SonoVue, consisting of a dispersion of sulphur hexafluoride microbubbles. The examinations were made using ATL HDI-5000, Acuson SEQUOIA and Aloka 5500 Prosound ultrasound systems with 5.2 MHz curved-array probes. The concordance between US and CE-CT images was evaluated on site by two radiologists blinded to CT RESULTS: The FLLs were assessed in the arterial (20 s after CM injection), portal (after 45-60 s) and late (after 120 s) phases for: 1) presence/absence of enhancement 2) distribution of enhancement (homogenous or target distribution, centripetal or centrifugal flow, and other), 3) qualitative enhancement pattern (hyperechoic, hypoechoic, or isoechoic) versus normal liver parenchyma. RESULTS: The concordance between SonoVue-enhanced US and CE-CT was 85%. Moreover during portal venous phase with CEUS it was possible to differentiate between malignancy or benignity of 91% of lesions. CONCLUSIONS: The preliminary data obtained in this study suggest that continuous low acoustic power imaging and contrast-enhanced US show similar results to CT in contrast distribution and contrast enhancement patterns.     

Does the echogenicity of focal liver lesions on baseline gray-scale ultrasound interfere with the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound?

The objective was to evaluate whether the echogenicity of focal liver lesions (FLLs) on baseline gray-scale ultrasound (US) interferes with the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) for small FLLs. Three-hundred and eighty-eight patients were examined by real-time CEUS using a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent. The images of 114 hyperechoic lesions, 30 isoechoic lesions and 244 hypoechoic lesions were reviewed by two blinded independent readers. A five-point confidence level was used to discriminate malignant from benign lesions, and specific diagnoses were made. The diagnostic performances were evaluated by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The diagnostic performances of CEUS on hyperechoic lesions in terms of the areas (Az) under the ROC curve were 0.987 (reader 1) and 0.981 (reader 2), and were 0.987 (reader 1) and 0.984 (reader 2) for iso- and hypoechoic lesions, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were 87.0–95.9%, 93.1–100%, 88.6–100%, 70.0–97.1% and 90.0–95.1%, respectively. The echogenicity of FLLs on baseline gray-scale US does not appear to interfere with the diagnostic ability of CEUS for small FLLs.     

超声造影在移植肝脏局灶性低回声病灶鉴别诊断中的应用

 目的 评价超声造影技术在肝移植术后肝脏局灶性低回声病灶鉴别诊断中的应用价值.方法 对肝移植术后肝脏出现局灶性低回声病灶患者,用西门子 Sequoia512彩色多普勒超声诊断仪和超声造影剂Sonovue进行超声造影检查,观察3个时相的造影剂灌注模式,并用自动跟踪对比量化技术(Axius ACQ)对病灶及周围肝组织进行定量分析.结果 10例出现局灶性低回声病灶的患者中,超声造影明确诊断梗死灶5例(低回声病灶为无增强,ACQ分析无造影剂灌注),非均质脂肪肝3例(低回声病灶在动脉相、门脉相呈高增强,ACQ分析该区域为正常肝组织,周围肝组织为血流灌注不良区域),肝癌复发2例(其特征为动脉相快速均匀高增强,门脉相及延迟相快速消退).结论 超声造影技术能较好评估肝实质的血流灌注分布情况,有助于移植肝脏梗死灶、非均质性脂肪肝及肿瘤复发的鉴别诊断.     

超声造影对移植肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值

目的：评价超声造影对移植肝脏局灶性病变的诊断价值。方法：对30例移植肝脏局灶性病变患者,用西门子Sequoia 512彩色多普勒超声诊断仪和超声对比剂Sonovue进行超声造影检查,观察三个时相的对比剂灌注模式,并用自动跟踪对比量化技术（Axius ACQ）对病灶及周围肝组织进行定量分析。所有病例均经病理及临床随访证实。结果：30例移植肝脏局灶性病变患者,超声造影正确诊断29例,包括肝癌复发18例、非均质脂肪肝5例、肝血管瘤4例、梗死灶2例;超声造影误诊1例,超声造影怀疑肝癌复发,经穿刺活检诊断为局灶性脂肪浸润。结论：移植肝脏局灶性病变具有各自典型的增强模式,超声造影技术有助于移植肝脏局灶性病变的鉴别诊断,具有重要临床价值。     

超声造影鉴别肝脏局灶性病变良恶性的临床意义

目的评价超声造影技术在鉴别良恶性肝脏局灶性病变中的临床意义,并与常规超声比较。方法 83例经穿刺活检及手术或临床证实的肝脏局灶性病变(38例恶性和45例良性)均经常规超声和超声造影检查,对肝脏局灶性病变在造影检查中的强化型式与时相特征逐例进行了观察与记录,并用卡方检验比较了两种方法对肝脏局灶性病变的诊断效能。结果肝脏局灶性病变随其良性与恶性而表现为不同的强化型式与时相特征。超声造影正确诊断34例恶性和43例良性病变,其诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为89.5%、95.6%和92.8%,而常规超声正确诊断23例恶性和22例良性病变,其诊断敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为60.5%、48.9%和54.2%。两种方法诊断效能比较有统计学差异(P<0.01)。结论超声造影技术在肝脏局灶性病变良恶性鉴别诊断中具有重要的临床应用价值,并可取代常规超声。     

Focal liver lesions in cirrhosis: Role of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) represents a great innovation for the evaluation of focal liver lesions (FLLs). The main advantage of CEUS is the real-time imaging examination and the very low toxicity in patients with renal failure. Liver cirrhosis has been recognized as a major risk factor for the onset of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC). HCC in liver cirrhosis develops as the last step of a complex that leads to the gradual transformation from regenerative nodule through dysplastic nodule to HCC. In patients with liver cirrhosis, a surveillance program is recommended consisting of ultrasound (US) for detecting small focal lesions. A wide spectrum of benign and malignant lesions other than HCC may be found in the cirrhotic liver and their differentiation is important to avoid errors in staging diseases that may preclude potentially curative therapies. Several published studies have explored the value of CEUS in liver cirrhosis and they have been shown to have excellent diagnostic and prognostic performances for the evaluation of non-invasive and efficient diagnosis of FLLs in patients at high risk for liver malignancies. The purpose of this article is to describe and discuss CEUS imaging findings of FLLs including HCC and ICC, all of which occur in cirrhotic livers with varying prevalence.     

Imaging features of hepatic angiomyolipomas on real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound

The aim of this study was to evaluate the imaging features of hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) on contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). The imaging features of 12 pathologically proven hepatic AML lesions in 10 patients who had undergone baseline ultrasound (BUS) and CEUS examinations were evaluated retrospectively. The enhancement extent, pattern and dynamic change, along with the enhancement process, on CEUS were analysed. The diagnostic results of BUS and CEUS before pathological examination were also recorded. The results showed that 75% (9/12) of the AML lesions exhibited mixed echogenicity on BUS and most showed remarkable hyperechogenicity in combination with a hypoechoic or anechoic portion. Arterial flow signals were detected in 75% (9/12) of the lesions on colour Doppler imaging. On CEUS, 66.7% (n = 8) of the 12 lesions exhibited hyperenhancement in the arterial phase, slight hyperenhancement (n = 2) or isoenhancement (n = 6) in the portal phase, and slight hyperenhancement (n = 1) or isoenhancement (n = 7) in the late phase. Three (25%) lesions exhibited hyperenhancement in the arterial phase and hypoenhancement in both portal and late phases. One (8.3%) lesion exhibited hypoenhancement throughout the CEUS process. Before pathological examination with BUS, only 3 (25%) lesions were correctly diagnosed as hepatic AML. Conversely, on CEUS, correct diagnoses were made for 66.8% (8/12) of hepatic AMLs. Therefore, arterial hyperenhancement and subsequent sustained enhancement on CEUS were found in the majority of hepatic AMLs. The combination of BUS and CEUS leads to the correct diagnosis in the majority of hepatic AMLs, and is higher than the success rate achieved by BUS alone.Hepatic angiomyolipoma (AML) is generally considered a rare benign mesenchymal tumour of the liver [1]. With the increasing clinical application of imaging, more and more hepatic AMLs are being detected [2, 3]. Baseline ultrasound (BUS) is the first-line imaging modality for liver use owing to its relatively low cost, non-invasiveness, easy manipulation and ready availability; however, its ability to characterise focal liver lesions (FLLs) cannot meet the requirement in the clinical setting [4]. The advent of the second-generation ultrasound contrast agents and contrast-specific ultrasound techniques allows depiction of the micro- and macro-circulation of FLLs, which has facilitated a great improvement in the characterisation of FLLs [5, 6]. However, until now, few reports in the literature have described the use of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in hepatic AML [7–11]. Herein we analyse retrospectively the imaging features of 12 hepatic AMLs on CEUS; the diagnostic results of BUS and CEUS before pathological examination are also recorded.     

Focal liver lesions: can SonoVue-enhanced ultrasound be used to differentiate malignant from benign lesions?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) with SonoVue could differentiate malignant focal liver lesions (FLLs) from benign lesions and provide lesion type diagnoses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Four hundred fifty-six patients with 554 FLLs were examined by CEUS with SonoVue using low mechanical index, nonlinear imaging techniques. Each lesion was characterized by 2 independent off-site readers as malignant or benign and given specific lesion type diagnosis, if possible, both at baseline ultrasound (US) and after SonoVue administration (CEUS). The final diagnosis was achieved by histopathology obtained from biopsy or surgical specimens, or by typical manifestation on contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. RESULTS: The diagnostic accuracies of the 2 readers were 41.9% and 35.2% for baseline US, which improved significantly to 87.2% and 87.9% for CEUS (P < 0.05). Interreader agreement also increased with CEUS compared with baseline US (ê value changed from 0.49 to 0.77). The accuracy for lesion type diagnosis was 38.4% and 32.5% for baseline US, which increased to 77.6% and 78.0% for CEUS (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS with SonoVue improves differentiation between malignant and benign FLLs, and also provides improved lesion type (differential) diagnosis.     

Small nodules (1–2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: Characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

ObjectiveTo determine the diagnostic efficacy of arterial phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for characterizing small hepatic nodules (1–2 cm) in patients with high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).Materials and methodsOver 12 months, CEUS was performed in 59 patients at high-risk for HCC with small hepatic nodules (1–2 cm; mean, 1.5 cm). Based only on arterial phase (<45 s) vascular intensity and pattern, lesions were prospectively diagnosed as HCC if there was hypervascularity without known features of hemangioma. The diagnosis of HCC was made regardless of the presence or absence of washout. Verification of diagnosis was made by liver transplantation (n = 13), biopsy (n = 12), resection (n = 3) or clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 12 months (n = 31).ResultsAt of the time of CEUS, the 59 nodules were diagnosed as HCC in 26 and benign lesions in 33, including 20 regenerative/dysplastic nodules (RN/DN), 11 hemangiomas, and 2 focal fat sparing. All 26 nodules with arterial phase hypervascularity without hemangioma-like features were HCC. However, CEUS misdiagnosed HCC as RN/DN in 4 cases with arterial iso- (n = 3) or hypovascularity (n = 1). CEUS correctly diagnosed all 11 hemangiomas. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS for diagnosing HCC were 86.7, 100, and 93.2%.ConclusionsArterial phase vascular intensity and pattern of CEUS are highly accurate for the diagnosis of small (1–2 cm) HCC and hemangioma in liver cirrhosis. On CEUS, arterial phase hypervascularity without a hemangioma-pattern alone may be sufficient for diagnosis of small HCC. Infrequent iso/hypovascular HCC may erroneously suggest RN/DN necessitating biopsy or close follow-up.     

Computer-aided diagnosis for contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the liver

Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) has become one of the major research subjects in medical imaging and diagnostic radiology. The basic concept of CAD is to provide computer output as a second opinion to assist radiologists' image interpretations by improving the accuracy and consistency of radiologic diagnosis and also by reducing the image-reading time. To date, research on CAD in ultrasound (US)-based diagnosis has been carried out mostly for breast lesions and has been limited in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology, with most studies being conducted using B-mode US images. Two CAD schemes with contrast-enhanced US (CEUS) that are used in classifying focal liver lesions (FLLs) as liver metastasis, hemangioma, or three histologically differentiated types of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are introduced in this article: one is based on physicians' subjective pattern classifications (subjective analysis) and the other is a computerized scheme for classification of FLLs (quantitative analysis). Classification accuracies for FLLs for each CAD scheme were 84.8% and 88.5% for metastasis, 93.3% and 93.8% for hemangioma, and 98.6% and 86.9% for all HCCs, respectively. In addition, the classification accuracies for histologic differentiation of HCCs were 65.2% and 79.2% for well-differentiated HCCs, 41.7% and 50.0% for moderately differentiated HCCs, and 80.0% and 77.8% for poorly differentiated HCCs, respectively. There are a number of issues concerning the clinical application of CAD for CEUS, however, it is likely that CAD for CEUS of the liver will make great progress in the future.     

Focal liver lesion detection and characterization: Comparison of non-contrast enhanced and SPIO-enhanced diffusion-weighted single-shot spin echo echo planar and turbo spin echo T2-weighted imaging

PurposeTo compare lesion conspicuity and image quality between single-shot spin echo echo planar imaging (SS SE-EPI) before, immediately and 5 min after intravenous (IV) injection of superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) for detecting and characterizing focal liver lesions (FLLs).Materials and methodsTwenty-five patients suspected for colorectal liver metastases were prospectively included. Lesion detection and characterization were compared between all SS SE-EPI and T2-weighted turbo spin echo (T2w TSE) sets (two-sided Fisher’s exact test). Image quality and lesion conspicuity were compared for SS SE-EPI sets using rank order statistic (RIDIT). Reference standard comprised of surgery, biopsy and/or follow-up.ResultsReference standard demonstrated 18 benign and 43 malignant FLLs. Best lesion detection (p < 0.05) was achieved with non-contrast-enhanced SS SE-EPI. Lesion characterization was best using all T2w TSE sequences. Best image quality and lesion conspicuity (p < 0.05) was achieved with non-contrast-enhanced SS SE-EPI.ConclusionNon-contrast-enhanced SS SE-EPI was best for lesion detection. SS SE-EPI sequences were not useful for lesion characterization (differentiation between benign and malignant lesions). Unenhanced SS SE-EPI did not allow differentiation especially as many benign FLLs were hyperintense on the highest b-value images. Combining unenhanced and SPIO-enhanced SS SE-EPI performed better but still was not clinically useful due to variable degree of uptake and vascular pooling of SPIO for (especially) benign FLLs. T2w TSE with SPIO-enhancement was needed for characterization.     

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the characterization of benign focal liver lesions: activity-based cost analysis

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to perform a cost analysis of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the study of benign focal liver lesions (BFLL) with indeterminate appearance on ultrasonography (US). MATERIALS AND METHODS: A decision model of patients with suspected BFLL on baseline US who subsequently underwent CEUS between 2002 and 2005 was constructed. We analysed the cost effectiveness of CEUS, considering whether or not computed tomography (CT) was necessary for the diagnosis. There were 398 patients with 213 angiomas, 41 focal nodular hyperplasias (FNH) and 154 pseudolesions (focal fatty sparing, focal fatty areas). Each patient underwent CEUS, and 98 of them were also studied by CT. All lesions were followed up. RESULTS: The cost of a single CEUS examination was 101.51 euros, and that of a single CT scan was 211.48 euros. For diagnosis of haemangiomas, we saved 1,406.97 euros in 2002, 5,315.22 euros in 2003, 10,317.78 euros in 2004 and 9,536.13 euros in 2005. For diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasias, we saved 781.65 euros in 2003, 781.65 euros in 2004 and 1,406.97 euros in 2005. For diagnosis of pseudolesions, we saved 2,813.94 euros in 2002, 5,158.89 euros in 2003, 5,158.89 euros in 2004 and 4,220.91 euros in 2005. In the period 2002-2005, the introduction of CEUS allowed us to save a total of 47,055.33 euros in the diagnosis of benign focal hepatic liver lesions. CONCLUSIONS: This cost analysis shows that CEUS is the least expensive second-line modality after baseline US for the diagnosis of BFLL.     

Small nodules (1-2 cm) in liver cirrhosis: characterization with contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Objective

To determine the diagnostic efficacy of arterial phase contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) for characterizing small hepatic nodules (1-2 cm) in patients with high-risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Materials and methods

Over 12 months, CEUS was performed in 59 patients at high-risk for HCC with small hepatic nodules (1-2 cm; mean, 1.5 cm). Based only on arterial phase (<45 s) vascular intensity and pattern, lesions were prospectively diagnosed as HCC if there was hypervascularity without known features of hemangioma. The diagnosis of HCC was made regardless of the presence or absence of washout. Verification of diagnosis was made by liver transplantation (n = 13), biopsy (n = 12), resection (n = 3) or clinical and imaging follow-up for at least 12 months (n = 31).

Results

At of the time of CEUS, the 59 nodules were diagnosed as HCC in 26 and benign lesions in 33, including 20 regenerative/dysplastic nodules (RN/DN), 11 hemangiomas, and 2 focal fat sparing. All 26 nodules with arterial phase hypervascularity without hemangioma-like features were HCC. However, CEUS misdiagnosed HCC as RN/DN in 4 cases with arterial iso- (n = 3) or hypovascularity (n = 1). CEUS correctly diagnosed all 11 hemangiomas. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CEUS for diagnosing HCC were 86.7, 100, and 93.2%.

Conclusions

Arterial phase vascular intensity and pattern of CEUS are highly accurate for the diagnosis of small (1-2 cm) HCC and hemangioma in liver cirrhosis. On CEUS, arterial phase hypervascularity without a hemangioma-pattern alone may be sufficient for diagnosis of small HCC. Infrequent iso/hypovascular HCC may erroneously suggest RN/DN necessitating biopsy or close follow-up.     

Enhancement characteristics of liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinomas, and hemangiomas with Gd-EOB-DTPA: preliminary results with dynamic MR imaging

Our objective was to study Gd-EOB-DTPA for the characterization of focal liver lesions by means of dynamic MR imaging. A double-blind and randomized dose-ranging phase-2 clinical trial was performed in 31 patients (liver metastases n = 23, hepatocellular carcinoma n = 4, and hemangioma n = 4) at a field strength of 1.0 Tesla. Gd-EOB-DTPA (Schering AG, Berlin, Germany) was administered as an IV bolus (12.5, 25, or 50 μmol/kg body weight) with dynamic T1-weighted MRI during the distribution and cellular uptake of the contrast agent at multiple time points up to 45 min post contrast. Dynamic changes in tumor signal intensity, tumor–liver contrast, enhancement patterns, side effects, and adverse events were evaluated. Monitoring of vital signs revealed no significant changes during bolus injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA. Liver metastases demonstrated an inhomogeneous uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA during the distribution phase with a washout effect on delayed images > 3 min and highest tumor–liver contrast 20 and 45 min post contrast. Hepatocellular carcinomas showed prolonged enhancement as compared with metastases and hemangiomas. Hemangiomas exhibited an early peripheral–nodular enhancement with subsequent partial or complete filling, persisting enhancement < 10 min following injection of Gd-EOB-DTPA, and delayed washout as compared with liver metastases. Initial clinical experience suggests that Gd-EOB-DTPA as a bolus injectable hepatobiliary MR contrast agent may offer useful features for the characterization of focal liver lesions. Received 4 January 1996; Revision received 13 March 1996; Accepted 4 June 1996     

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia: diagnostic performance compared with contrast-enhanced CT

Objectives

To investigate and compare contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the characterisation of histologically proven focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT).

Methods

CEUS was performed in 85 patients with 85 histologically proven FNHs. Enhancement, centrifugal filling, spoke-wheel arteries, feeding artery and central scarring were reviewed and correlated with lesion size or liver background. Independent factors for predicting FNH from other focal liver lesions (FLLs) were evaluated. Forty-seven FLLs with CECT were randomly selected for comparison of diagnostic performance with CEUS.

Results

Centrifugal filling was more common (P?=?0.002) and the significant predictor (P?=?0.003) in FNHs ≤3 cm. Lesion size or liver background has no significant influence on the detection rate of the spoke-wheel arteries and feeding artery (P?>?0.05). Central scarring was found in 42.6 % of FNHs ≥3 cm (P?=?0.000). The area under the ROC curve, sensitivity and specificity showed no significant differences between CEUS and CECT (P?>?0.05), except that the sensitivity of CEUS was better for reader 1 (P?=?0.041).

Conclusion

CEUS is valuable in characterising centrifugal filling signs or spoke wheels in small FNHs and should be employed as the first-line imaging technique for diagnosis of FNH.

Key Points

? The confident diagnosis of focal nodular hyperplasia is important in liver imaging. ? The centrifugal filling sign is useful for diagnosis of FNHs ≤3 cm. ? Contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT have similar diagnostic performance for FNH. ? CEUS should be the first-line imaging technique for the diagnosis of FNH.     

Fat in the liver: diagnosis and characterization

The purpose of this article is to provide an update on imaging techniques useful for detection and characterization of fat in the liver. Imaging findings of liver steatosis, both diffuse steatosis and focal fatty change, as well as focal fatty sparing, are presented. In addition, we will review computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) findings of focal liver lesions with fatty metamorphosis, including hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatocellular adenoma, focal nodular hyperplasia, angiomyolipoma, lipoma, and metastases.