Root coverage and pocket reduction as combined surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND: One of the main objectives of periodontal reconstructive surgery is the coverage of exposed roots due to gingival recession. A large variety of mucogingival grafting procedures are available that give highly predictable and esthetically acceptable results when treating intact root surfaces. However, these procedures call for a second surgery site in the palate. The present study examines a series of cases in which connective tissue, obtained from the tuberosity during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla, was used for root coverage. METHODS: Forty-four teeth from 25 patients with gingival recession of 3.30 +/- 0.14 mm (mean +/- SEM) were treated with subepithelial connective tissue grafts using connective tissue obtained from the tuberosity area during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla. RESULTS: The mean root coverage recession after treatment was 0.16 +/- 0.06 mm, with effectiveness of coverage at 95.0% +/- 1.84 and a predictability of 84.1%. Periodontal probing depth reduction at the donor site was 4.08 +/- 0.24 mm. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that the subepithelial connective tissue graft obtained from the tuberosity area during pocket reduction procedures in the posterior region of the maxilla provides a very predictable and esthetic root coverage without the need for a second surgical site.     

A preliminary comparative study of the guided tissue regeneration and free gingival graft procedures for adjacent facial root coverage.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of guided tissue regeneration with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene membranes to that of free gingival graft for treatment of adjacent facial gingival recession. METHOD AND MATERIALS: Eight adjacent gingival recession sites with Miller class I or II defects containing at least a maxillary or mandibular canine were selected in 6 patients. Four recession sites in 3 patients were treated with guided tissue regeneration, and the other 4 sites in the remaining 3 patients were treated with free gingival graft. Probing depth, gingival recession, attachment level, width of keratinized gingiva, and root coverage were recorded before surgery (baseline) and 6 months and 1 year postoperatively. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements were found for gingival recession, attachment level, and root coverage from baseline to 6 months and 1 year postoperatively in both groups. Both procedures produced the same average reduction in gingival recession, gain in attachment level, and amount of root coverage after 1 year. Probing depths did not differ between groups throughout the study. The width of keratinized gingiva was significantly greater in the grafted group than in the guided tissue regeneration group. CONCLUSION: Both procedures produced the same average amount of root coverage, reduction in gingival recession, and gain in clinical attachment. The guided tissue regeneration procedure provided a better esthetic appearance without any difference in gingival color or architecture in cases of adjacent facial gingival recession.     

Failure of root coverage of shallow gingival recessions employing GTR and a bioresorbable membrane

The aim of the present study was to compare the postsurgical outcome of two different modes of surgical root coverage of predominantly shallow, Class I or II, gingival recessions. Fourteen facial recessions in nine patients were subjected to a coronally repositioned flap in combination with a bioresorbable membrane, and 14 sites in 13 patients were treated with a connective tissue graft employing an envelope technique. Immediately before surgery and after 6 and 12 months, gingival dimensions as well as root coverage and attachment gain were assessed. At baseline, mean recession depths amounted to 2.77+/-1.67 mm and 2.49+/-1.07 mm for patients treated with a bioresorbable membrane and a free connective tissue graft, respectively. Acceptable and stable root coverage of 81% to 82% of baseline recession depth and 78% of its width was achieved by grafting. In contrast, guided tissue regeneration (GTR) resulted in only 50% coverage of recession depth and, after 12 months, only 11% of its width (P < 0.01). Logistic regression revealed that the odds of obtaining success, ie, at least 80% root coverage, were 3.3 times greater in cases treated with a connective tissue graft (P < 0.05). In addition, the odds ratio was 2.3 in cases of recessions below 2.5 mm compared to deeper recessions and 2 at canines compared to premolars. It was concluded that shallow recessions in the 1.5 to 3.5 mm range should not be treated with GTR. In these situations, predictable results are achieved with free connective tissue grafts employing an envelope technique.     

Changes in gingival dimensions following connective tissue grafts for root coverage: comparison of two procedures

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to investigate the changes in gingival dimensions and root coverage using the same surgical procedure but varying the amount of the connective tissue graft left uncovered. METHODS: Twenty-five Class I or II recession defects in 20 healthy subjects were randomly assigned to test (exposed connective tissue group; E group) or control (fully covered connective tissue group; FC group) groups and treated with a connective tissue graft procedure. In the E group, 1 to 2 mm of the graft was left uncovered at the completion of the surgery, whereas the FC group had the graft completely covered by the flap. Clinical parameters assessed included probing depth, recession depth, clinical attachment level, width of keratinized tissue, mobility, and plaque score. RESULTS: At 12 weeks, the mean root coverage percentages for FC and E groups were 93% and 88%, respectively. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (P=0.48). Complete root coverage was observed in 79% and 64% of the subjects in FC and E groups, respectively. There was greater increase in the width of keratinized tissue in the E group (1.5+/-1.1 mm) than the FC group (0.9+/-0.9 mm), although this difference did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for the changes in other parameters. CONCLUSIONS: Both procedures resulted in successful root coverage with an increase in the width of keratinized tissue. Leaving a portion of the graft exposed resulted in a greater increase of keratinized tissue, and complete coverage of the graft resulted in greater root coverage. However, these differences did not reach statistical significance.     

Coverage of localized gingival recessions: comparison of micro- and macrosurgical techniques

BACKGROUND: In the presence of a thin and narrow zone of gingival tissue root recessions caused by trauma or inflammatory reactions seem to be a common feature of the buccal tissue morphology. The surgical coverage is mainly indicated for aesthetic reasons and may be accomplished with pedicled flaps in conjunction with or without the use of connective tissue grafts. AIM: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the degree of vascularization of connective tissue grafts by applying a microsurgical approach. In addition, the clinical outcome was followed for 1 year. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study population consisted of 10 patients with bilateral Class I and II recessions at maxillary canines. In split-mouth design, the defects were randomly selected for recession coverage either by a microsurgical (test) or macrosurgical (control) approach. Immediately after the surgical procedures, and after 3 and 7 days of healing, fluorescent angiograms were performed to evaluate graft vascularization. In addition, the clinical parameters were assessed before the surgical intervention, and 1, 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The results of the angiographic evaluation at test sites revealed a vascularization of 8.9+/-1.9% immediately after the procedure. After 3 days and after 7 days, the vascularization rose to 53.3+/-10.5% and 84.8+/-13.5%, respectively. The corresponding vascularization at control sites were 7.95+/-1.8%/44.5+/-5.7% and 64.0+/-12.3%, respectively. All the differences between test and control sites were statistically significant. The clinical measurements revealed a mean recession coverage of 99.4+/-1.7% for the test and 90.8+/-12.1% for the control sites after the first month of healing. Again, this difference was statistically significant. The percentage of root coverage both test and control sites remained stable during the first year at 98% and 90%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present controlled clinical study has demonstrated that in root surface coverage, a microsurgical approach substantially improved the vascularization of the grafts and the percentages of root coverage compared with applying a conventional macroscopic approach.     

Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study

BACKGROUND: Many surgical techniques have been shown to be effective in correcting gingival recessions by covering the exposed root with soft tissue; however, the thickness of the gingival tissue over the root surface probably plays an important role in preventing the recurrence of tissue recession. The aim of the present study was to compare the results of a mucogingival bilaminar technique (BT), guided tissue regeneration (GTR), and a combined periodontal regenerative technique (CPRT) in achieving root coverage and increasing the gingival thickness 1 year after surgical treatment. METHODS: In 45 systemically healthy, non-smoking patients aged 33.6 +/- 4.3 years with no periodontal pockets >4 mm, a Miller's Class I or II gingival recession was treated for root coverage: 15 patients underwent BT (connective tissue with partial-thickness double pedicle graft), 15 GTR by a bioabsorbable membrane, and 15 CPRT by a collagen membrane and collagen-incorporated hydroxyapatite. Before and 1 year after surgical treatments, the following clinical parameters were recorded: gingival recession (GR), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), keratinized tissue width (KT), and gingival thickness (GT); the percentage of root coverage was also calculated and the data were statistically analyzed. RESULTS: All 3 techniques yielded significant improvements in terms of GR decrease, CAL and KT gain, and GT increase compared to baseline values. Mean root coverage was 90.0%, 81.01%, and 87.12% in BT, GTR, and CPRT groups, respectively. Complete root coverage was observed in 60%, 40%, and 53.3% of subjects from the BT, GTR, and CPRT groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed among the 3 techniques in GR or CAL improvements; however, BT produced a significantly (P<0.01) greater increase of KT, and BT and CPRT groups showed a significantly (P<0.01) greater increase of GT compared to the GTR group. CONCLUSIONS: BT, GTR, and CPRT successfully treated gingival recession defects, obtaining comparable percentages of root coverage, but BT and CPRT created a thick gingival tissue significantly greater than that achieved with GTR.     

A 2-year follow-up of root coverage using sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts and subepithelial connective tissue autografts

BACKGROUND: Coverage of roots exposed by gingival recession is one of the main objectives of periodontal reconstructive surgery. A large variety of mucogingival grafting procedures are available. However, the long-term effectiveness of this procedure is still not clear. This study compared the effectiveness of sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts with subepithelial connective tissue autografts in achieving root coverage 2 years postoperatively. METHODs: One hundred one (101) patients were treated with dermal matrix allografts (mean age, 28.4+/- 0.7 years; mean recession, 4.2 mm) and 65 patients treated with connective tissue graft (mean age, 30.1+/- 1.4 years; mean recession, 4.9 mm). All patients underwent full periodontal evaluation and presurgical preparation, including oral hygiene instruction and scaling and root planing. The exposed roots were thoroughly planed and covered by a graft without any further root treatment or conditioning. There were no differences in the average age, time of follow-up, or gender between the two groups. Patients were evaluated periodically between 1 and 2 years. Residual recession and defect coverage were assessed. RESULTS: Mean residual root recession after root coverage with acellular dermal matrix allograft was 0.2 +/- 0.04 mm, with defect coverage of 95.9% +/- 0.9%. Frequency of defect coverage was 82.2%. Root coverage was 98.8% +/- 0.2%, resulting in a frequency of root coverage of 100%. Gain in keratinized gingiva was 2.2+/- 0.04 mm and attachment gain was 4.5+/- 0.1 mm per patient. Connective tissue autografts resulted in mean residual root recession of 0.1+/- 0.04 mm, with percent defect coverage of 97.8%+/- 0.6% and frequency of defect coverage of 95.4%. Root coverage was 99.1%+/- 0.2%, and frequency of root coverage was 100%. Gain in keratinized gingiva was 3.0+/- 0.1 mm and attachment gain was 5.3+/- 0.2 mm per patient. No significant differences in final recession and root coverage between the two treatment methods were found. However, autografts resulted in significant increases in defect coverage, keratinized gingival gain, attachment gain, and residual probing depth. The clinical results were stable for the 2-year follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that coverage of root by sub-pedicle acellular dermal matrix allografts or subepithelial connective tissue autografts is a very predictable procedure which is stable for 2 years postoperatively. However, subepithelial connective tissue autografts resulted in significant increases in defect coverage, keratinized gingival gain, attachment gain, and residual probing depth.     

Root coverage: comparison of coronally positioned flap with and without titanium-reinforced barrier membrane

BACKGROUND: Various surgical procedures have been proposed as effective treatment methods for recession defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of root coverage comparing the coronally positioned flap (CPF) with and without guided tissue regeneration (GTR) using a titanium-reinforced expanded polytetrafluoroethylene barrier in paired gingival recession defects. METHODS: Procedures were performed in 10 patients having bilateral buccal recession defects > or = 2.0 mm on maxillary canines and first premolars. Mucoperiosteal flaps were raised and root surfaces were scaled, planed, and conditioned. Randomly assigned sites received either GTR + CPF or CPF treatment. Clinical parameters measured at baseline and at 6 months after the procedure included gingival recession depth (GRD), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), keratinized gingival width (KGW), and alveolar crest level (ACL). RESULTS: GRD decreased from 3.4 +/- 0.6 mm to 1.9 +/- 1.2 mm with GTR (45% root coverage) and from 3.3 +/- 0.4 mm to 1.3 +/- 0.7 mm with CPF (60% root coverage). The difference in GRD decrease between procedures was significant. CAL, KGW, and PD differences between procedures were not significant. ACL mean gain was significant (1.0 +/- 0.6 mm in the GTR group and 0.2 +/- 0.3 mm in the CPF group; P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both GTR and CPF procedures result in root coverage. The amount of root coverage obtained with CPF was greater than that observed with GTR, although GTR resulted in significantly greater ACL gain.     

A novel approach to minimizing gingival recession in the treatment of vertical bony defects

BACKGROUND: In ideal conditions, the gain in clinical attachment following regenerative therapy of infrabony defects should be equal to probing depth reduction; thus, gingival recession should not increase as a consequence of the treatment procedures. The goal of the study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical technique for the treatment of intrabony defects aimed at minimizing gingival recession and increasing the potential for clinical periodontal regeneration. METHODS: Fifteen deep intrabony defects were treated with cause-related therapy aimed at eliminating bleeding on probing in the surgical area with minimal mechanical trauma to the root and the soft tissues. Four weeks later, a surgical technique combining the simplified papilla preservation approach at the level of the defect and the coronally advanced buccal flap at the adjacent teeth was performed. Enamel matrix protein was used in the intrabony defect. Soft tissue measurements were made before cause-related therapy, before and after surgery, and at the 1-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up visits. The clinical reevaluation was made 1 year after the surgery. RESULTS: No changes in the position of the buccal and interproximal soft tissues next to the defect area were observed before and after cause-related therapy or when comparing the baseline (before surgery) and 1-year follow-up visits. The clinical attachment gain (5.9 +/- 1.4 mm), probing depth reduction (6.0 +/- 0.8 mm), and radiographic bone level gain (5.0 +/- 0.5 mm) were statistically and clinically significant, whereas no statistically significant increase in gingival recession (0.1 +/- 1.0 mm) was noted during the observation period. CONCLUSIONS: It is possible to avoid statistically and clinically significant changes in the position of the soft tissues when treating vertical bony defects. This can be accomplished by minimizing soft tissue trauma during cause-related therapy and by advancing the buccal flap coronally during the surgery.     

Expanded mesh connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions

BACKGROUND: The connective tissue graft procedure is an effective method to achieve root coverage. Although multiple sites often need grafting, the palatal mucosa supplies only a limited area of grafting material. The expanded mesh graft provides a method whereby a graft can be stretched to cover a larger area. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness and the predictability of expanded mesh connective tissue graft (e-MCTG) in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. METHODS: Fifty-two buccal gingival recessions were treated in 10 systemically healthy patients. Fifteen recession treated operation sites with at least three adjacent Miller Class I and/or II recessions were performed. The connective tissue graft obtained from the palatal mucosa was expanded to cover the recipient bed, which was 1.5 times larger than the graft. Clinical measurements recorded at baseline and 12 months postoperatively included gingival recession depth (RD), gingival recession width (RW), percentage root coverage (RC), probing depth (PD), width of keratinized tissue (KT), and clinical attachment level (CAL). RESULTS: Twelve months after surgery, a statistically significant gain in CAL (3.2 +/- 0.8 mm, P < 0.001) and increase in KT (1.2 +/- 0.4, P < 0.001) were assessed. In 80% of the treated sites, 100% RC was achieved (mean 96%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that the use of e-MCTG technique allowed the treatment of multiple adjacent recessions with adequate wound healing and highly predictable root coverage. This procedure can be applied favorably in treating multiple gingival recessions in one surgery.     

Factors affecting the outcomes of coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure

BACKGROUND: The coronally advanced flap (CAF) has been used to treat gingival recession. However, the final outcomes (percentage of root coverage) vary from case to case. Hence, the purpose of this study was to analyze the factors that may affect the results of CAF root coverage procedures. METHODS: Twenty-three systemically healthy patients (mean age, 43.8 +/- 11.9 years) each with one Miller's Class I buccal recession defect were included. Baseline clinical parameters included recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), gingival thickness (GT), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), and gingival index (GI). CAF root coverage procedures were performed to correct the recession defects. Patients were followed at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-surgery, at which time wound healing index (WHI) and other measurements were recorded. RESULTS: The mean baseline RD was 2.9 +/- 0.4 mm; RW, 3.4 +/- 0.6 mm; WKT, 2.7 +/- 1.3 mm; and GT, 1.1 +/- 0.3 mm. At mid-buccal, the mean CAL was 4.5 +/- 0.8 mm. Six months after surgery, the average RC was 82.3% +/- 24.7%; RD, 0.5 +/- 0.7 mm; RW, 0.4 +/- 0.9 mm; WKT, 3.2 +/- 0.9 mm; and GT, 1.5 +/- 0.5 mm. At mid-buccal, the mean CAL was 1.8 +/- 1.1 mm. From baseline to the 6-month follow-up, the changes of RC, RD, RW, WKT, GT, and CAL showed statistical significance (P < 0.05). Fourteen patients achieved 100% RC. The mean RC in partial coverage cases was 54.8% +/- 16.8%. Analysis revealed that an initial GT thicker than 1.2 +/- 0.3 mm was associated with complete root coverage at the 6-month follow-up (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: CAF is a predictable procedure to treat Miller's Class I mucogingival defects. Initial GT was the most significant factor associated with complete root coverage.     

Root coverage employing an envelope technique or guided tissue regeneration with a bioabsorbable membrane.

BACKGROUND: Different treatment modalities have been described for root coverage in cases of gingival recession. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the postsurgical outcome of 2 modes of surgical root coverage of predominantly shallow, Class I or II, gingival recessions. METHODS: Fourteen buccal recession sites in 13 patients were treated with free connective tissue grafts employing a modified envelope technique; 14 sites in 9 patients were subjected to a coronally repositioned flap in combination with a bioabsorbable membrane. Immediately before surgery as well as after 6 months, gingival dimensions, i.e., width and thickness, as well as root coverage and attachment gain, were assessed to the next 0.1 mm employing a caliper, an ultrasonic device, and a pressure calibrated, computerized periodontal probe. RESULTS: At the outset, mean recession depths amounted to 2.48+/-1.06 and 3.00+/-1.95 mm for patients treated with a free connective tissue graft and a bioabsorbable membrane, respectively. With the former technique, 80+/-24% root surface could be covered after 6 months, while the latter resulted in only 45+/-40% coverage. The contrast in reduction of recession width was even more pronounced (77+/-35% versus 18+/-37%). In both groups, an increase of gingival thickness of 0.6 to 0.7 mm was noticed. CONCLUSIONS: Small recessions may be covered more predictably with the modified envelope technique. 751.     

Comparison of 2 techniques of subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions.

BACKGROUND: The clinical outcome of connective tissue grafts in the treatment of gingival recessions has been documented in numerous studies. However, no attempt has been made to correlate the postoperative mucogingival changes with the surgical parameters. The present retrospective clinical study was undertaken to 1) evaluate root coverage and mucogingival changes 1 to 1.5 years following treatment of Miller's Class I and II recession defects using 2 variants of the subepithelial connective tissue graft (SCTG) procedure, and 2) assess the effect of the surgical parameters on the postoperative gingival width. METHODS: Thirty-one recessions in 10 patients treated with the envelope technique (E) and 31 recessions in 11 patients treated with coronally positioned flap combined with connective tissue graft (CP) were retrospectively analyzed to evaluate: 1) percentage of root coverage obtained with the 2 procedures and variations in width of keratinized tissue (KT) 1 to 1.5 years postsurgery, and 2) the effect of the surgical parameters on the postoperative gingival width. RESULTS: Results showed a mean root coverage percentage of 89.6 +/- 15% for the E group and 94.7 +/- 11.4% for the CP group; the difference between groups was statistically insignificant (P = 0.1388). Mean KT increased significantly from 1.4 +/- 1.1 mm presurgery to 4.5 +/- 1.1 mm postsurgery for the E group while a minor increase in KT was observed in the CP group (2 +/- 1.5 mm presurgery versus 2.7 +/- 1.6 mm postsurgery). For both treatment groups, the mean postsurgical width of keratinized tissue (POSTKT) was found to be mathematically correlated with the mean presurgical width of keratinized tissue (PREKT) and the corono-apical height of the graft that remained exposed (GE) coronal to the flap margin in the recipient site. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of human gingival recession defects by the 2 variants of SCTG resulted in significant recession reduction. When SCTG is grafted beneath alveolar mucosa using the combined technique (CP), transformation of the mucosa into keratinized tissue does not seem to occur, at least within 1 to 1.5 years postsurgery. The treatment outcome in terms of keratinized tissue width seems to be correlated with the presurgical gingival dimensions and the height of the graft that remains exposed at the end of the surgical procedure.     

Modified coronally advanced flap associated with a subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of adjacent multiple gingival recessions

BACKGROUND: The clinical choice of the appropriate surgical technique aiming at root coverage relies, among other factors, on the number of adjacent gingival recessions. This study aimed to clinically evaluate the effectiveness and the predictability of root coverage at adjacent multiple gingival recessions using a modified coronally positioned flap associated with the subepithelial connective tissue graft. METHODS: Ten non-smoking, healthy subjects (five men and five women; mean age, 28.7 years) presenting 29 Class I or II adjacent multiple gingival recessions were enrolled. Each patient was treated using a modified coronally advanced flap associated with the subepithelial connective tissue graft. Probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), recession depth (RD), and width of keratinized tissue (KT) were measured at baseline and 6 months later. The Student t test was used to compare treatment outcomes through time. RESULTS: The results revealed significant CAL gain (mean gain +/- SD, 1.97 +/- 0.94 mm; P <0.0001), RD decrease (2.03 +/- 0.78 mm; P <0.0001), and KT increase (1.31 +/- 1.23 mm, P <0.0001). The average root coverage was 96.7%, and complete root coverage was found at 93.1% of the defects. Nine of the 10 patients (90% of the patients) experienced complete root coverage. CONCLUSIONS: The modified coronally advanced flap associated with the subepithelial connective tissue graft was effective and predictable to produce root coverage at multiple adjacent gingival recessions associated with gain in the CAL and in the width of KT.     

Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study

BACKGROUND: Many surgical techniques have been proposed for the correction of dental root exposition. Among these, bilaminar techniques (BTs) have been reported as offering the best results in terms of root coverage (RC). However, BTs require a second surgical site to harvest the graft, with discomfort for the patient. The use of an acellular dermal matrix (ADM) avoids the need for a donor site. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical results of 2 BTs by autogenous connective tissue (CT) or ADM. METHODS: In 30 systemically healthy, non-smoking patients aged 34.5 +/- 5.2 years, who showed no periodontal pockets >4 mm after a hygienic phase, a Miller's class I or II gingival recession was treated for root coverage. All patients underwent a BT: in 15 patients, an autogenous connective tissue graft was employed (CT group); in the other 15 subjects, ADM was used as a subepithelial graft (ADM group). Prior to and 1 year after surgical treatment, the following clinical parameters were recorded: gingival recession (GR), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), width of keratinized tissue (KT), and gingival thickness (GT); the percentage of RC (%RC) was also calculated, and the data were statistically analyzed. The number of weeks needed to obtain complete healing with mature tissue appearance was also recorded. RESULTS: Both groups yielded significant improvements in terms of GR decrease, CAL and KT gain, and GT increase as compared to baseline values. The mean %RCs were 88.80 +/- 11.65% and 83.33 +/- 11.40% in the CT and ADM groups, respectively. Complete RC was observed in 46.6% of patients from the CT group, and 26.6% of the ADM group patients. No significant differences were observed between the two techniques for GR, CAL, and GT improvements; however, the CT group produced a significantly (P <0.01) greater increase in KT as compared to the ADM group. Complete healing of the surgical procedure was observed 6.20 +/- 1.01 and 8.93 +/- 1.33 weeks after suture removal in the CT and ADM groups, respectively (P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CT and ADM subepithelial grafts were similarly able to successfully treat gingival recession defects; however, the CT group obtained a significantly greater increase in KT, and showed a quicker complete healing.     

Coronally advanced flap: a modified surgical approach for isolated recession-type defects: three-year results

BACKGROUND: Various modifications of the coronally displaced flap have been proposed in the literature with the attempt of treating gingival recession with uneven predictable results. The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effectiveness with respect to root coverage of a modification of the coronally advanced flap procedure for the treatment of isolated recession-type defects in the upper jaw. METHODS: Forty isolated gingival recessions with at least 1 mm of keratinized tissue apical to the defects were treated with a modified approach to the coronally advanced flap. The main change in the surgical procedure consisted in the modification of flap thickness and dimension of surgical papillae during flap elevation. All recessions fall into Miller class I or II. The clinical re-evaluation was performed 1 year and 3 years after the surgery. RESULTS: At the 1-year examination, the average root coverage was 3.72+/-1.0 mm (98.6% of the pre-operative recession depth) and 3.64+/-1.1 mm (96.7%) at 3 years. The gain in probing attachment amounted to 3.65+/-1.10 mm at 1 year and to 3.70+/-1.09 mm at 3 years. The average increase of keratinized tissue between the baseline and the 3-year follow-up amounted to 1.78+/-0.90 mm. All changes of keratinized tissue (difference between baseline and 1 year, baseline and 3 years, and between 1 and 3 years) were statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The modified coronally advanced surgical technique is effective in the treatment of isolated gingival recession in the upper jaw.     

The use of a bioabsorbable barrier for regenerative management of marginal tissue recession. I. Report of 100 consecutively treated teeth

BACKGROUND: Periodontal plastic surgical procedures aimed at coverage of exposed root surfaces have evolved into routine treatment modalities. The present study was designed to assess the effectiveness and the predictability of a bioabsorbable barrier in the treatment of human recession defects utilizing a single-step surgical procedure. METHODS: One hundred consecutive single and multiple adjacent Miller Class I, II, and III buccal recession defects in 41 patients were treated with a combination of a bioabsorbable barrier and coronally advanced flap technique. Clinical parameters were recorded immediately prior to surgery, at 3 months, and after a minimum of 6 months. RESULTS: A highly significant reduction in recession depth from a mean value of 3.2 +/- 0.9 mm preoperatively to 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm postoperatively, corresponding to a mean root coverage of 92. 7% +/- 14.1%, was obtained. Complete (100%) root coverage was obtained in 75% of the sites. Factors adversely affecting root coverage were membrane exposure postoperatively and preoperative recession depth > or =4 mm. In addition, inferior results were achieved at mandibular incisor and maxillary molar sites. Factors having no effect on root coverage included maxillary versus mandibular sites and single versus multiple adjacent sites. CONCLUSIONS: The use of guided tissue regeneration in periodontal plastic surgery is highly predictable, and highly esthetic root coverage can be gained without requiring a second surgical procedure or a second surgical site and is, therefore, an attractive alternative to conventional grafting techniques.     

Periodontal microsurgery: report of 16 cases consecutively treated by the free rotated papilla autograft technique combined with the coronally advanced flap

The coronally advanced flap combined with a free connective tissue graft is a predictable method for achieving root coverage in buccal gingival recession. Nevertheless, this procedure conventionally requires involvement of a second surgical site; the latter is avoided by the proposed technique. Sixteen isolated gingival recessions (2.5 to 4.0 mm deep) were surgically treated with a coronally advanced flap associated with a connective tissue graft harvested from one adjacent papilla whose dimensions matched those of the exposed root area. Procedures were performed with the aid of a surgical microscope. Recession depth, probing depth, periodontal attachment level, and keratinized tissue width were recorded at baseline and 12 months after surgery. Mean recession moved from 3.38 +/- 0.72 mm at baseline to 0.13 +/- 0.29 mm at 12 months, a gain of 97.03%. In 13 of the 16 cases 12 months after surgery, the gingival margin was located at the CEJ or coronal to it, while in two cases the residual recession was less than 1.0 mm and in another case it was 1.0 mm. Mean periodontal attachment level was 4.72 +/- 1.00 mm at baseline and 1.03 +/- 0.59 mm at follow-up. Mean keratinized tissue increased from 1.25 +/- 0.75 mm to 3.47 +/- 0.87 mm. All differences between 12 months and baseline were statistically significant. No pockets were present at baseline, and this situation remained stable during the observation period. All 16 isolated recessions treated showed an excellent gain in root coverage without requiring a second surgical site and thus reducing patient morbidity.     

The effect of platelet-rich plasma on the coronally advanced flap root coverage procedure: a pilot human trial

BACKGROUND: Coronally advanced flap (CAF) has been shown to effectively treat gingival recession. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP), containing autologous growth factors, has been shown to promote soft tissue healing. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of PRP in combination with CAF. METHODS: Twenty-four systemically healthy patients participated in this study. A single Miller's Class I buccal recession defect per patient was treated. These patients were randomly assigned into CAF or PRP + CAF groups. Clinical parameters included recession depth (RD), recession width (RW), gingival thickness (GT), width of keratinized tissue (WKT), clinical attachment level (CAL), probing depth (PD), plaque index (PI), wound healing index (WHI), and gingival index (GI). PRP was prepared from whole blood drawn prior to surgery and applied to root surfaces. Patients were followed at 2, 4, 12, and 24 weeks post-surgery. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed the study. The RD at 24 weeks was significantly reduced from 2.9 +/- 0.5 to 0.5 +/- 0.6 mm in the CAF group (P < 0.05) and from 2.8 +/- 0.2 to 0.5 +/- 0.7 mm in the PRP + CAF group (P < 0.05). The mean root coverage was 83.5% +/- 21.8% in the CAF group and 81.0% +/- 28.7% in the CAF + PRP group (P > 0.05). Fourteen out of 23 patients (60.9%) experienced 100% root coverage at the 24-week postoperative follow-up. CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this pilot study, the application of PRP in CAF root coverage procedure provides no clinically measurable enhancements on the final therapeutic outcomes of CAF in Miller's Class I recession defects.     

Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession.

BACKGROUND: Different techniques have been proposed for the treatment of gingival recessions. This study compared the clinical results of gingival recession treatment using a subepithelial connective tissue graft and an acellular dermal matrix allograft. METHODS: Nine patients with bilateral Miller Class I or II gingival recessions were selected. A total of 30 recessions were treated and randomly assigned to the test group and the contralateral recession to the control group. In the control group, the exposed root surfaces were treated by the placement of a connective tissue graft in combination with a coronally positioned flap; in the test group, an acellular dermal matrix allograft was used as a substitute for palatal donor tissue. Probing depth, clinical attachment level, gingival recession, and width of keratinized tissue were measured 2 weeks prior to surgery and 3 and 6 months postsurgery. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the test group and the control group in terms of recession reduction, clinical attachment gain, and reduction in probing depth. The control group had a statistically significant increased area of keratinized tissue after 3 months compared to the test group. Both procedures, however, produced an increase in keratinized tissue after 6 months, with no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION: The acellular dermal matrix allograft may be a substitute for palatal donor tissue in root coverage procedures.