Letrozole is superior to anastrozole in suppressing breast cancer tissue and plasma estrogen levels

PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of the third-generation aromatase inhibitor letrozole (Femara) on breast cancer tissue levels of estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)), and estrone sulfate (E(1)S) in postmenopausal women undergoing primary treatment for locally advanced estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor-positive breast cancers. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Breast cancer tissue samples were collected before and following 4 months of neoadjuvant therapy with letrozole (2.5 mg o.d.), and tissue estrogen levels measured using a highly sensitive RIA after high-pressure liquid chromatography purification. RESULTS: Letrozole suppressed pretreatment tumor levels of E(2), E(1), and E(1)S by 97.6%, 90.7%, and 90.1%, respectively. These data reveal that letrozole suppresses tissue estrogen levels significantly below what has previously been recorded with anastrozole (89.0%, 83.4%, and 72.9% suppression, respectively) using the same methods. To confirm the differential effect of letrozole and anastrozole on each plasma estrogen fraction, we re-analyzed plasma samples obtained from a previous intrapatient cross-over study comparing letrozole and anastrozole using an improved RIA (detection limits of 0.67, 1.14, and 0.55 pmol/L for E(2), E(1), and E(1)S, respectively). Letrozole consistently suppressed each plasma estrogen fraction below the levels recorded for anastrozole: E(2) (average suppression by 95.2% versus 92.8%; P = 0.018), E(1) (98.8% suppression versus 96.3%; P = 0.003), and E(1)S (98.9% suppression versus 95.3%; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION: Our data reveals that letrozole (2.5 mg o.d.) is more effective compared with anastrozole (1.0 mg o.d.) with respect to tissue as well as plasma estrogen suppression in patients with postmenopausal breast cancer.     

Influence of neoadjuvant anastrozole (Arimidex) on intratumoral estrogen levels and proliferation markers in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

Anastrozole (Arimidex) is a novel, selective, and potent aromatase inhibitor used for the treatment of postmenopausal breast cancer. The drug has been shown to inhibit in vivo aromatization by 96--97% and to suppress plasma estrogen levels by 84--94%. However, the effects of anastrozole on intratumoral estrogen levels have not been studied. Here we report the effects of neoadjuvant treatment with anastrozole on intratumoral levels of estrone (E(1)), estradiol (E(2)), and estrone sulfate (E(1)S), measured by a highly sensitive RIA following a multistep purification procedure involving high-pressure liquid chromatography. Tumor tissue was obtained prior to treatment and after 15 weeks on therapy with anastrozole (1 mg once daily) from 12 postmenopausal women with locally advanced breast cancer (T(3)--T(4) and/or N(2)). Pretreatment tissue levels of E(2), E(1), and E(1)S were 217.9 (69.8--679.9), 173.6 (83.9--358.9), and 80.7 (31.4--207.3) fmol/g tissue (geometric mean values with 95% confidence interval, respectively). Treatment with anastrozole suppressed tissue E(2), E(1), and E(1)S levels by 89.0% (73.2--95.5%), 83.4% (63.2--92.5%), and 72.9% (47.3--86.1%), respectively, compared with baseline levels, with no significant difference between responders and nonresponders. Plasma levels of E(2), E(1), and E(1)S were suppressed by 86.1, 83.9, and 94.2%, respectively. Anastrozole caused a decrease in the immunoexpression of the proliferation markers Ki67 and pS2 in all of the patients, with a trend for a more profound suppression in those achieving an objective response. The mean percentage of apoptotic cells was found to be decreased in responders and increased in nonresponders after 15 weeks of anastrozole therapy. Our results reveal anastrozole to cause a significant suppression of tissue estrogen levels and to influence the biology of primary estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers in postmenopausal women.     

An overview of the pharmacology and pharmacokinetics of the newer generation aromatase inhibitors anastrozole,letrozole, and exemestane

BACKGROUND: The newer generation, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs) anastrozole and letrozole have shown superior efficacy compared with tamoxifen as first-line treatments and compared with megestrol acetate as second-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma. In an open-label, Phase II trial, it was reported that exemestane showed numerical superiority compared with tamoxifen for objective response and clinical benefit. Because these agents ultimately may be administered for periods of up to 5 years in the adjuvant setting, it is of increasing importance to assess their tolerability and pharmacologic profiles. METHODS: In the absence of data from direct clinical comparisons, the published literature was reviewed for the clinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic characteristics, and selectivity profiles of anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane. RESULTS: At clinically administered doses, the plasma half-lives of anastrozole (1 mg once daily), letrozole (2.5 mg once daily), and exemestane (25 mg once daily) were 41-48 hours, 2-4 days, and 27 hours, respectively. The time to steady-state plasma levels was 7 days for both anastrozole and exemestane and 60 days for letrozole. Androgenic side effects have been reported only with exemestane. Anastrozole treatment had no impact on plasma lipid levels, whereas both letrozole and exemestane had an unfavorable effect on plasma lipid levels. In indirect comparisons, anastrozole showed the highest degree of selectivity compared with letrozole and exemestane in terms of a lack of effect on adrenosteroidogenesis. CONCLUSIONS: All three AIs demonstrated clinical efficacy over preexisting treatments. However, there were differences in terms of pharmacokinetics and effects on lipid levels and adrenosteroidogenesis. The long-term clinical significance of these differences remains to be elucidated.     

Anastrozole ('Arimidex') blocks oestrogen synthesis both peripherally and within the breast in postmenopausal women with large operable breast cancer

The effect of anastrozole on peripheral and tumour aromatase activity and oestrogen levels in postmenopausal patients with oestrogen receptor-rich breast tumours was investigated. Twenty-six patients were randomly allocated to treatment with anastrozole 1 mg (n=13) or 10 mg (n=13), once daily. Before and after 12 weeks' treatment, patients were infused with 3H-Delta4 androstenedione (20 MBq) and 14C-oestrone (E1) (1 MBq) for 18 h. Oestrogens were purified from excised tumours and plasma samples taken after each infusion. Peripheral and tumour aromatase activity and tumour E1 uptake were calculated from levels of 3H and 14C in purified E1 fractions from tumour and plasma. Endogenous tumour oestrogens were measured by radioimmunoassay. Twenty-three patients were available for analysis (1 mg group, n=12; 10 mg group, n=11). Following treatment, anastrozole (1 and 10 mg) markedly inhibited peripheral aromatase in all patients (the difference between pre- and on-treatment values being highly significant P<0.0001). In situ aromatase activity was also profoundly decreased by anastrozole treatment in 16 of 19 tumours (the difference with treatment also being highly significant P=0.0009). Most tumours were able to concentrate E1 beyond levels in the circulation; anastrozole treatment had no consistent effect on uptake of E1. Endogenous tumour levels of both E1 and oestradiol (E2) were significantly reduced with therapy (P=0.028 for E1 and P=0.0019 for E2). Anastrozole (1 and 10 mg daily) effectively suppresses aromatase activity, and subsequently oestrogen levels, within the breast tissue of postmenopausal women with large or locally advanced, operable, oestrogen receptor-rich breast cancers.     

Effect of anastrozole and tamoxifen on lipid metabolism in Japanese postmenopausal women with early breast cancer

Endocrine therapies that profoundly decrease estrogen levels potentially have a detrimental effect on the cardiovascular system. This study evaluated the effect on lipid metabolism of one such agent, the new generation aromatase inhibitor anastrozole, compared with tamoxifen, when used as adjuvant treatment in postmenopausal Japanese women with early breast cancer. All patients had completed primary surgery and were randomized to anastrozole 1 mg once daily (n=22) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (n=22). Anastrozole significantly reduced levels of triglycerides and remnant-like particle cholesterol, whereas tamoxifen significantly increased these. Activity of lipoprotein lipase and levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol significantly increased after anastrozole treatment. In contrast, activity of hepatic triglyceride lipase, also a key enzyme of triglyceride metabolism, significantly decreased following treatment with tamoxifen. We thus conclude that in our study anastrozole had a beneficial effect on lipid profiles of postmenopausal women with early breast cancer after 12 weeks of treatment.     

Tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors in the treatment of breast cancer in menopausal women: pharmacological and clinical aspects

Estrogen is the main hormone involved in the development and growth of hormone-dependent breast cancer. Endocrine adjuvant treatment in recent years focused primarily on the use of SERMs, mainly tamoxifen. Tamoxifen actions are complex. It acts by competitive antagonism of estrogen at its receptor site. It has beneficial agonistic effects in preventing bone demineralization in postmenopausal women, but a detrimental agonistic effect by increasing the risk of uterine cancer and of thrombo-embolism. However, the situation is changing rapidly with the introduction of recent aromatase inhibitors, which display high specificity towards aromatase. They suppress plasma estrogen levels in postmenopausal women by inhibiting or inactivating aromatase, the enzyme responsible of the synthesis of estrogens from androgenic substrates. A complete estrogen deprivation in target tissues may eventually induce osteoporosis. Unlike tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors have no partial agonistic action. During the last 20 years, adjuvant tamoxifen treatment for 5 years was the "gold standard" endocrine treatment in postmenopausal women with hormone-receptor-positive breast cancers. A 25% reduction risk of deaths was observed. Recently, the results of clinical trials comparing aromatase inhibitors to tamoxifen in post menopausal women with hormone-dependent breast cancer showed a benefit in favor of aromatase inhibitors in reducing the risk of recurrence. These trials were either comparative (for anastrozole) or sequential (for anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane). The issues of long term adverse effects (bone) and hormone treatment sequence remain to be addressed.     

Differences between the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole – of clinical importance?

Aromatase inhibition is the gold standard for treatment of early and advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women suffering from an estrogen receptor-positive disease. The currently established group of anti-aromatase compounds comprises two reversible aromatase inhibitors (anastrozole and letrozole) and on the other hand, the irreversible aromatase inactivator exemestane. Although exemestane is the only widely used aromatase inactivator at this stage, physicians very often have to choose between either anastrozole or letrozole in general practice. These third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole/Femara (Novartis Pharmaceuticals, Basel, Switzerland) and anastrozole/Arimidex (AstraZeneca, Pharmaceuticals, Macclesfield, Cheshire, UK)), have recently demonstrated superior efficacy compared with tamoxifen as initial therapy for early breast cancer improving disease-free survival. However, although anastrozole and letrozole belong to the same pharmacological class of agents (triazoles), an increasing body of evidence suggests that these aromatase inhibitors are not equipotent when given in the clinically established doses. Preclinical and clinical evidence indicates distinct pharmacological profiles. Thus, this review focuses on the differences between the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors allowing physicians to choose between these compounds based on scientific evidence. Although we are waiting for the important results of a still ongoing head-to-head comparison in patients with early breast cancer at high risk for relapse (Femara Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation trial; 'FACE-trial'), clinicians have to make their choices today. On the basis of available evidence summarised here and until FACE-data become available, letrozole seems to be the best choice for the majority of breast cancer patients whenever a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor has to be chosen in a clinical setting. The background for this recommendation is discussed in the following chapters.     

Erythema nodosum secondary to aromatase inhibitor use in breast cancer patients: case reports and review of the literature

Aromatase inhibitors (AI’s) are increasingly being incorporated in the treatment strategy for hormone receptor positive breast cancer either alone or in combination with chemotherapy, biologics in both the adjuvant and metastatic setting [1]. They markedly suppress plasma estrogen levels by inhibiting or inactivating aromatase, the enzyme responsible for the synthesis of estrogens from androgenic substrates [1]. Currently, the three selective aromatase inhibitors that are available are anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane which reduce circulating estrogen to 1 to 10% of pretreatment levels [2]. For advanced breast cancer, aromatase inhibitors appear to be at a minimum, equivalent and perhaps even better than tamoxifen in the first line setting [3, 4]. In primary breast cancer, adjuvant therapy with anastrozole or letrozole appears to be superior to tamoxifen in reducing the risk of relapse [5, 6]. Common adverse effects associated with AI’s include arthralgias (21%), myalgias (12%), other musculoskeletal disorders (28%) and an up to 60% increased risk of bone fracture [7, 8]. However, anastrozole, exemestane and letrozole are associated with significantly fewer endometrial cancers, as well as venous and arterial vascular events, when compared with tamoxifen [9, 10]. Very rarely letrozole and anastrozole can cause a skin rash; the frequency of its occurrence has not been quantified^. However, exemestane has not been reported to cause a skin rash [11]. To date, erythema nodosum (EN) has not been reported as a dermatologic side effect of AI’s. Here, we report three cases of EN which developed in postmenopausal breast cancer patients on AI’s.     

A decade of letrozole: FACE

Third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (AIs), letrozole and anastrozole, are superior to tamoxifen as initial therapy for early breast cancer but have not been directly compared in a head-to-head adjuvant trial. Cumulative evidence suggests that AIs are not equivalent in terms of potency of estrogen suppression and that there may be differences in clinical efficacy. Thus, with no data from head-to-head comparisons of the AIs as adjuvant therapy yet available, the question of whether there are efficacy differences between the AIs remains. To help answer this question, the Femara versus Anastrozole Clinical Evaluation (FACE) is a phase IIIb open-label, randomized, multicenter trial designed to test whether letrozole or anastrozole has superior efficacy as adjuvant treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR)- and lymph node-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients (target accrual, N=4,000) are randomized to receive either letrozole 2.5 mg or anastrozole 1 mg daily for up to 5 years. The primary objective is to compare disease-free survival at 5 years. Secondary end points include safety, overall survival, time to distant metastases, and time to contralateral breast cancer. The FACE trial will determine whether or not letrozole offers a greater clinical benefit to postmenopausal women with HR+ early breast cancer at increased risk of early recurrence compared with anastrozole.     

The potency and clinical efficacy of aromatase inhibitors across the breast cancer continuum

The strategy of using estrogen suppression to treat breast cancer led to the development of aromatase inhibitors, including the third-generation nonsteroidal compounds anastrozole and letrozole, and the steroidal compound exemestane. Aromatase inhibitors potently inhibit aromatase activity and also suppress estrogen levels in plasma and tissue. In clinical studies in postmenopausal women with breast cancer, third-generation aromatase inhibitors were shown superior to tamoxifen for the treatment of metastatic disease. Studies of adjuvant therapy with aromatase inhibitors include (i) head-to-head studies of 5 years of the aromatase inhibitor versus 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy; (ii) sequential therapy of 2–3 years of tamoxifen followed by an aromatase inhibitor (or the opposite sequence) versus 5 years of tamoxifen monotherapy; (iii) extended therapy with an aromatase inhibitor after 5 years of tamoxifen; and (iv) sequential therapy with an aromatase inhibitor versus aromatase inhibitor monotherapy. Recent results from the Arimidex, Tamoxifen, Alone or in Combination and Breast International Group 1–98 trials advocate using an aromatase inhibitor upfront. This article examines the clinical data with aromatase inhibitors, following a brief summary of their pharmacology.     

Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer therapy

Estrogens are involved in numerous physiological processes and have crucial roles in certain disease states, such as mammary carcinomas. Estradiol, the most potent endogenous estrogen, is biosynthesized from androgens by the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex called aromatase. Aromatase is found in breast tissue and the importance of intratumoral aromatase and local estrogen production is being unraveled. Inhibition of aromatase is an important approach for reducing growth stimulatory effects of estrogens in estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy for the treatment of breast cancer. The initial nonselective nature of nonsteroidal inhibitors, such as aminoglutethimide, has been greatly reduced in the later generations of inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole. Mechanism-based steroidal inhibitors, such as 4-hydroxyandrostenedione and exemestane produce potent aromatase inhibition in patients. The potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, are approved for clinical use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone-dependent breast cancer and as second-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients failing antiestrogen therapy alone or multiple hormonal therapies.     

Aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer therapy

Estrogens are involved in numerous physiological processes and have crucial roles in certain disease states, such as mammary carcinomas. Estradiol, the most potent endogenous estrogen, is biosynthesized from androgens by the cytochrome P450 enzyme complex called aromatase. Aromatase is found in breast tissue and the importance of intratumoral aromatase and local estrogen production is being unraveled. Inhibition of aromatase is an important approach for reducing growth stimulatory effects of estrogens in estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Steroidal and nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors have shown clinical efficacy for the treatment of breast cancer. The initial nonselective nature of nonsteroidal inhibitors, such as aminoglutethimide, has been greatly reduced in the later generations of inhibitors, anastrozole and letrozole. Mechanism-based steroidal inhibitors, such as 4-hydroxyandrostenedione and exemestane produce potent aromatase inhibition in patients. The potent and selective third-generation aromatase inhibitors, anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane, are approved for clinical use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with metastatic hormone-dependent breast cancer and as second-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal patients failing antiestrogen therapy alone or multiple hormonal therapies.     

Effect of letrozole on the lipid profile in postmenopausal women with breast cancer

Hormonal therapy plays a central role in the overall treatment of breast cancer. Aromatase inhibitors can inhibit the aromatase enzyme system resulting in a reduction of oestrogens. Letrozole is a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor that effectively blocks aromatase activity without interfering with adrenal steroid biosynthesis. The drug can significantly reduce the levels of plasma oestrogens, which remain suppressed throughout the treatment. Data are scarce concerning the influence of these drugs on serum lipid levels. In the present study, we evaluated the effects of letrozole on the serum lipid profile in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. A total of 20 patients with breast cancer were treated with letrozole, 2.5 mg once daily. After an overnight fast, serum lipid parameters (total cholesterol, high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, apolipoproteins A1, B and E and lipoprotein (a)) were measured before treatment and at 8 and 16 weeks afterwards. A significant increase in total cholesterol (P=0.05), LDL cholesterol (P<0.01) and apolipoprotein B levels (P=0.05) in the serum, as well as in the atherogenic risk ratios total cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (P<0.005) and LDL cholesterol/HDL cholesterol (P<0.005) was noticed after letrozole treatment. We conclude that letrozole administration in postmenopausal women with breast cancer has an unfavourable effect on the serum lipid profile.     

Superior efficacy of letrozole versus tamoxifen as first-line therapy for postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer: results of a phase III study of the International Letrozole Breast Cancer Group.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of tamoxifen with that of letrozole, an oral aromatase inhibitor, with tamoxifen as first-line therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine hundred seven patients were randomly assigned letrozole 2.5 mg once daily (453 patients) or tamoxifen 20 mg once daily (454 patients). Patients had estrogen receptor- and/or progesterone receptor-positive tumors, or both receptors were unknown. Recurrence during adjuvant antiestrogen therapy or within the following 12 months or prior endocrine therapy for advanced disease precluded enrollment. One prior chemotherapy regimen for metastatic disease was allowed. The primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Secondary end points included overall objective response rate (ORR), its duration, rate and duration of clinical benefit, time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival, and tolerability. RESULTS: TTP was significantly longer for letrozole than for tamoxifen (median, 41 v 26 weeks). Treatment with letrozole reduced the risk of progression by 30% (hazards ratio, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.82, P =.0001). TTP was significantly longer for letrozole irrespective of dominant site of disease, receptor status, or prior adjuvant antiestrogen therapy. Similarly, TTF was significantly longer for letrozole (median, 40 v 25 weeks). ORR was higher for letrozole (30% v 20%; P =.0006), as was the rate of clinical benefit (49% v 38%; P =.001). Survival data are currently immature and not reported here. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Letrozole was significantly superior to tamoxifen in TTP, TTF, ORR, and clinical benefit rate. Our results support its use as first-line endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.     

The effect of combining aromatase inhibitors with antiestrogens on tumor growth in a nude mouse model for breast cancer

We have previously established a model for postmenopausal, hormonedependent breast cancer in nude mice which is responsive to both antiestrogens and aromatase inhibitors. In this model, MCF7 human breast carcinoma cells transfected with the aromatase gene (MCF7_CA) synthesize sufficient estrogen to form tumors in ovariectomized nude mice. In the present study we used this intratumoral aromatase model to investigate the effects on tumor growth of the new nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors letrozole (CGS 20,267) and anastrozole (ZD 1033) and the antiestrogens tamoxifen (ICI 47,474) and faslodex (ICI 182,780). Furthermore, we determined whether the inhibition of estrogen synthesis together with inhibition of estrogen action would be more effective in controlling breast tumor growth. The results of our studies indicate that the aromatase inhibitors anastrozole and letrozole, as well as the new pure antiestrogen faslodex, have potent antitumor effects in the mouse model. In the treatment of mice with mammary tumors, letrozole was more effective in suppressing tumor growth than anastrozole. This was consistent with the Ki values of these inhibitors against placental aromatase and the IC₅₀ values in cell culture (MCF7_CA), which indicated the greater potency of letrozole as an aromatase inhibitor. Letrozole also had greater antitumor effects than tamoxifen and faslodex. The antitumor effect of letrozole was substantial, making it difficult to detect any additional effect on the tumors when letrozole was combined with the antiestrogens. However, the combined treatment of anastrozole + tamoxifen and anastrozole + faslodex also did not increase efficacy compared to the aromatase inhibitor alone. In addition, combining the two antiestrogens did not suppress tumor growth more effectively than faslodex alone. Our results show that treatment with the combinations of aromatase inhibitors with either tamoxifen or faslodex are not more effective in blocking estrogen stimulation of tumor growth than the aromatase inhibitors alone.     

Double-blind randomised trial comparing the non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors letrozole and fadrozole in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of letrozole, an advanced non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, and fadrozole hydrochloride, an older-generation drug in this class, we conducted a randomised double-blind trial in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty-seven postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive letrozole or fadrozole in a multicentre, randomised double-blind trial in Japan. One hundred and fifty-four eligible patients were treated with either letrozole 1.0 mg once daily (n = 77) or fadrozole 1.0 mg twice daily (n = 77), for a minimum of 8 weeks. RESULTS: Letrozole showed a significantly higher overall objective response rate [complete response (CR) + partial response (PR)] than fadrozole (31.2% and 13.0%, respectively; P = 0.011, Fisher's exact test). Clinical benefits defined as CR, PR and stable disease (no change in status for more than 24 weeks) were also higher in patients treated with letrozole (50.6%) than fadrozole (35.1%). Letrozole was significantly superior to fadrozole in terms of the dominant lesion in soft tissue, bone and viscera (P = 0.011, stratified Mantel-Haenszel test). Median time to progression was 211 days in the letrozole group and 113 days in the fadrozole group with no significant difference (P = 0.175, log-rank test). Letrozole markedly reduced the estradiol, estrone and estrone sulfate levels in peripheral blood within 4 weeks. The suppressive effect of fadrozole on these hormone levels was insufficient. Adverse drug reactions were observed in 35.9% of the patients treated with letrozole and in 39.5% of those treated with fadrozole with no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.74, Fisher's exact test). Most of the adverse drug reactions were rated as grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: The results show letrozole at a dose of 1.0 mg once daily to be more effective in treating postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer than fadrozole at 1.0 mg twice daily, with similar safety and tolerability profiles.     

Sequential treatment with exemestane and non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors in advanced breast cancer

BACKGROUND: The steroidal aromatase inactivator exemestane has demonstrated activity after prior failure of non-steroidal aromatase inhibitors (including third-generation inhibitors letrozole and anastrozole) in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer. If exemestane is used as first anti-aromatase agent, however, it is unclear whether patients can still benefit from letrozole or anastrozole after progression. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with advanced, hormone receptor-positive or -unknown breast cancer were eligible for this study. Patients with no prior exposure to anti-aromatase drugs received exemestane, 25 mg daily, as first anti-aromatase agent. At the time of progression, patients were crossed-over to anastrozole or letrozole if further endocrine therapy was considered appropriate. Patients with prior exposure to anti-aromatase agents were also included in the study, and were given anastrozole or letrozole if they had previously received exemestane, or exemestane if they had previously received anastrozole or letrozole. The primary endpoint of the study was the clinical benefit rate (complete response + partial response + stabilization of disease for >or=24 weeks). RESULTS: Forty patients received exemestane 25 mg daily as first anti-aromatase agent, with a CB rate of 67.5% (95% CI 52.9-82.0%) and a median time to progression (TTP) of 9.6 months. In 18 patients, letrozole (n = 17) or anastrozole (n = 1) were used after failure of exemestane: the CB rate was 55.6% (95% CI 32.6-78.5%) with a median TTP of 9.3 months. In 23 patients, exemestane was used after failure of letrozole or anastrozole: the CB rate was 43.5% (95% CI 23.2-63.7%) with a median TTP of 5.1 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms that exemestane is active after prior failure of letrozole or anastrozole. We have also shown that patients can receive exemestane as their first anti-aromatase agent and still benefit from letrozole or anastrozole after progression. This suggests that the partial non-cross resistance between steroidal and non-steroidal anti-aromatase agents is independent of the sequence employed.     

A randomized,placebo-controlled trial (NCIC CTG MAP1) examining the effects of letrozole on mammographic breast density and other end organs in postmenopausal women

Mammographically detected breast density has been correlated with breast cancer risk. Breast density appears to be influenced by hormonal factors including increasing age, postmenopausal status, number of pregnancies, lower body weight, hormone replacement therapy, and tamoxifen therapy. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole profoundly reduces breast and circulating estrogen levels in postmenopausal women. We hypothesize that letrozole may reduce breast density and report here on its effects on mammographic breast density, bone mineral density (BMD), bone biomarkers, plasma hormone, and serum lipid levels. MAP1 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, feasibility trial in which postmenopausal women with or without prior invasive breast cancer were randomized in a 2:1 ratio of letrozole (2.5 mg daily) or placebo for 12 months and followed for a total of 24 months. Eligible women had an estimated >25% breast density on baseline mammogram. The primary endpoint was change in percent breast density (PD) between the baseline and 12-month mammograms as estimated by a computer-assisted thresholding program. Baseline and 12-month mammographic density was also assessed in a blinded manner by visual inspection. Secondary endpoints included changes in serum hormones, plasma lipid levels, bone biomarkers, and BMD. Data are available for 67 women (44 on letrozole and 23 on placebo). No significant changes in PD were noted between the treatment arms at either 12 or 24 months. No distinguishable difference in density measurements by visual inspection were noted between baseline and 12-month mammograms. A significant decrease in percentage change in T-score of the femoral neck at 12 months was noted in the letrozole arm without other significant changes in BMD parameters. Lipid values did not differ between treatment groups except for a borderline significant decrease in total cholesterol at 3 months among women treated with letrozole. Letrozole therapy was associated with a significant reduction in mean serum estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate levels at 12 months, but not at 24 months. A significant increase in serum IGF-1 levels was also noted in the letrozole group compared to the placebo group at both 12 and 24 months. To conclude, compared with placebo, 12 months of letrozole therapy does not appear to have a significant effect on mammographic PD. Twelve months of letrozole was associated with a decrease of uncertain clinical significance in the T-score of the femoral neck at 12 months which was reversible at 24 months with recovery of estrogen levels. Letrozole therapy was found to increase IGF-1 levels at 12 and 24 months.     

Aromatase inhibition in the treatment of advanced breast cancer: is there a relationship between potency and clinical efficacy?

Two-thirds of breast tumours are oestrogen-receptor positive and 60-70% of these tumours respond to interventions that reduce the effects of oestrogen. Until recently, tamoxifen was the drug of choice for the treatment of hormone-responsive early and advanced breast cancer. However, tamoxifen is associated with increased incidences of endometrial cancer and thromboembolic disease, and many tumours eventually become resistant to treatment with tamoxifen. Thus, there is a need for alternative therapies with different mechanisms of action. In postmenopausal women, aromatase inhibitors (AIs) suppress oestrogen levels by inhibiting oestrogen synthesis via the aromatase enzyme pathway. The third-generation AIs (anastrozole, letrozole and exemestane) are more potent than the earlier AIs (aminoglutethimide, formestane and fadrozole) with respect to both aromatase inhibition and oestrogen suppression. While the earlier AIs were unable to show any benefit over megestrol acetate or tamoxifen as second- and first-line therapy, respectively, in postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer, third-generation AIs have shown significant benefits in both settings. Comparison of aromatase inhibition and oestrogen suppression between the third-generation AIs anastrozole and letrozole showed a small but significantly greater difference in the degree of suppression of oestrone and oestrone sulphate (but not oestradiol), with letrozole. In an open-label trial, there were no significant differences between letrozole and anastrozole for the clinical end points of time to progression (primary end point), time to treatment failure, overall survival, clinical benefit, duration of clinical benefit, time to response, duration of response or objective response rate in patients with confirmed hormone receptor-positive tumours. Together these data suggest that once a certain threshold of aromatase inhibition is reached, small differences in oestrogen suppression between the third-generation AIs do not lead to clinically significant differences in overall efficacy.     

Approval summary: letrozole in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast cancer.

Letrozole (Femara; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., East Hanover, NJ) is a nonsteroidal inhibitor of aromatase enzyme complex. It inhibits the peripheral conversion of circulating androgens to estrogens. In postmenopausal women, letrozole decreases plasma concentrations of estradiol, estrone, and estrone sulfate by 75-95% from baseline with maximal suppression achieved within 2-3 days of treatment initiation. Suppression is dose related, with doses of >or=0.5 mg giving estrone and estrone sulfate values that were often below assay detection limits. At clinically used dosage, letrozole does not impair adrenal synthesis of glucocorticoids or aldosterone. In 1998, letrozole was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of advanced breast cancer in postmenopausal women, with hormone receptor positive or unknown breast cancer, who had failed one prior antiestrogen treatment (i.e., for "second-line" treatment). Approval was based on two randomized trials comparing tumor RRs of patients receiving 0.5 mg of letrozole, 2.5 mg of letrozole, and either megestrol acetate (MA) or aminoglutethimide. In the megestrol trial, 2.5 mg/day letrozole was superior to 0.5 mg of letrozole and MA (RRs 24, 13, and 16%, respectively), whereas in the aminoglutethimide trial, there was no significant difference in 2.5 mg of letrozole and 0.5 mg of letrozole RRs (20 and 17%). There was a trend toward RR superiority of 2.5 mg of letrozole over aminoglutethimide (P = 0.06). Letrozole (2.5 mg) was the dose chosen for comparison with tamoxifen in the first-line setting. In July 2000, a marketing application for first-line letrozole treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive or hormone receptor unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer was submitted to the FDA. A single double-blind, double dummy, randomized, and multicenter trial compared 2.5 mg of letrozole to 20 mg of tamoxifen (456 patients/arm). Letrozole was superior to tamoxifen with regard to time to progression (TTP) and objective response rate (RR). The median TTP for letrozole treatment was 9.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.1-12.2] versus 6.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.5) for tamoxifen, P = 0.0001, hazard ratio 0.713, (95% CI 0.61-0.84). RR was 32% for letrozole versus 21% for tamoxifen (odds ratio 1.74, 95% CI 1.29-2.34, P = 0.0003). Preliminary survival data (survival data are still blinded) indicate that letrozole is unlikely to be worse than tamoxifen. Both treatments were similarly tolerated. On the basis of these results, the United States FDA approved letrozole tablets, 2.5 mg/day, for first-line treatment of postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive or hormone receptor-unknown locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer. The manufacturer made a commitment to provide updated information on survival.