Management and outcomes of lower risk patients presenting with acute coronary syndromes in a multinational observational registry

OBJECTIVE: To document patterns of risk stratification, management practices, and outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) presenting without high risk features. PATIENTS: The study was based on 11,885 consecutive patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation ACS enrolled in GRACE (global registry of acute coronary events). Patients without dynamic ST segment changes, positive troponin (or other cardiac markers), or haemodynamic or arrhythmic instability were defined as being at lower risk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Management and outcomes were compared with high risk presentations. RESULTS: Of 11,885 patients presenting with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction, 4252 (36%) were regarded as being at lower risk. Functional testing for risk stratification was performed in 1163 of 4207 (28%) lower risk and 1531 of 7521 (20%) high risk patients (p < 0.0001). Coronary angiography was performed in 1930 of 4190 (46%) and 3860 of 7544 (51%), and echocardiography in 1692 of 4190 (40%) and 4348 of 7533 (58%) of lower risk and high risk patients, respectively (p < 0.0001 for both). Over one third of patients did not undergo further risk assessment with angiography or functional testing (2746 of 7437 (37%) high risk, 1499 of 4148 (36%) lower risk, not significant). Death occurring in hospital was more likely in the high risk cohort (41 of 4227 (1.0%) lower risk v 215 of 7586 (2.8%) high risk, p < 0.0001), whereas rates of recurrent angina during admission and readmission were similar in both groups (1354 of 4231 (32%) high risk, 2313 of 7587 (31%) lower risk, not significant). In the six months after discharge, death or myocardial infarction occurred in 79 of 3223 (2.5%) lower risk patients and 302 of 5451 (5.5%) high risk patients (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Globally, further risk stratification after ACS presentation is suboptimal, regardless of presenting characteristics. Although in-hospital death and myocardial infarction are uncommon, recurrent ischaemia is encountered often in both groups. It remains to be seen whether better outcomes may be achieved with wider application of risk stratification and appropriately directed management strategies.     

Treatment modalities of diabetes mellitus and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND: Oral treatments for diabetes mellitus (DM) may have a deleterious effect on acute coronary syndromes (ACS) outcomes. AIM: We aimed to examine in-hospital mortality among patients with ACS and DM and the impact of anti-DM treatment modalities. METHODS AND RESULTS: The Euro Heart Survey ACS prospectively enrolled 10484 patients across Europe and the Mediterranean basin. Of the 10214 patients with recorded DM status, 2352 (23.0%) had DM, of whom 562 were on diet alone, 1112 received oral hypoglycaemics, 561 received insulin, and 117 received both. The in-hospital mortality for ST-elevation-ACS was 9.8 and 5.7% for patients with and without DM, respectively, with an adjusted risk (95% confidence interval) of in-hospital mortality of 1.6 (1.2, 2.1). The in-hospital mortality for non-ST-elevation-ACS was 2.8 and 2.0%, accordingly, with an adjusted risk (95% confidence interval) of in-hospital mortality of 1.2 (0.8, 1.9). The in-hospital mortality for undetermined-electrocardiographic-pattern-ACS was 11.5 and 10.9%, accordingly, with an adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality of 1.1 (0.6, 2.0). Among DM patients with ST-elevation-ACS, the adjusted risks of in-hospital mortality were 1.0 for diet therapy, 0.8 (0.4, 1.5) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 1.9 (1.0, 3.8) for insulin; for DM patients and non-ST-elevation-ACS, 1.0 for diet therapy, 2.2 (0.6, 7.8) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 3.5 (1.0, 12.5) for insulin; for DM patients and undetermined-electrocardiographic-pattern-ACS, the adjusted risks of in-hospital mortality were 1.0 for diet therapy, 0.9 (0.2, 4.6) for oral hypoglycaemics, and 2.1 (0.5, 9.5) for insulin. CONCLUSIONS: Acute coronary syndrome patients with DM, especially those with ST-elevation, had increased in-hospital mortality. Among ACS patients with DM, those receiving insulin had worse outcomes. Outcomes were similar for those on hypoglycaemics or on diet alone.     

Diabetic patients with acute coronary syndromes in the UK: high risk and under treated. Results from the prospective registry of acute ischaemic syndromes in the UK (PRAIS-UK)

OBJECTIVES: Short-term randomised trials suggest that patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), admitted with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are at increased risk of subsequent adverse events. We tested whether this hypothesis was true for an unselected population of ACS patients with and without DM admitted with non-ST elevation MI or unstable angina, in a non-trial setting over a longer term of follow-up. METHODS: Prospective, centrally, coordinated multicenter registry involving 56 centers throughout the UK (half having angiographic facilities). Consecutive patients admitted with ACS without ST elevation on the presenting ECG were followed up to 6 months. A sub-group of patients were flagged with the UK Office for National Statistics and followed-up for death over 4 years. RESULTS: Data were collected on 1046 ACS patients of whom 170 (16%) had a prior diagnosis of DM. DM patients had higher baseline co-morbidities and unadjusted mortality rates at 6 months (11.8% vs. 6.4%, p=0.01). After correcting for clinical variables such as age, gender, smoking status and chest pain/ischaemic ECG changes on admission, prior history of any of myocardial infarction, heart failure, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia (on treatment), stroke or coronary revascularisation (PTCA or CABG), mortality rates for DM patients were no longer significantly raised (hazard ratio 1.35, 95% CI: 0.79-2.30; p=0.27 at 6 months and 1.15, 95% CI 0.72-1.83 at 4 years). 30% of diabetics were dead after 4 years of follow-up. Patients with DM were more likely to have been revascularised at 6 months and were more likely to receive ACE inhibitors. Based on the rate of recruitment and the population covered in the study, about 21,000 patients with DM will be admitted with non-ST elevation ACS each year in the UK. CONCLUSIONS: DM is common amongst patients admitted with ACS without ST elevation and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality: approximately 1 in 8 will not survive up to 6 months and 1 in 3 to 4 years. DM patients should be managed aggressively to reduce their risk of future complications.     

Current management of acute coronary syndromes in Australia: observations from the acute coronary syndromes prospective audit

Background: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS) management is now well informed by guidelines extrapolated from clinical trials. However, most of these data have been acquired outside the local context. We sought to describe the current patterns of ACS care in Australia. Methods: The Acute Coronary Syndrome Prospective Audit study is a prospective multi‐centre registry of ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), high‐risk non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS (NSTEACS‐HR) and intermediate‐risk non‐ST‐segment elevation ACS (NSTEACS‐IR) patients, involving 39 metropolitan, regional and rural sites. Data included hospital characteristics, geographic and demographic factors, risk stratification, in‐hospital management including invasive services, and clinical outcomes. Results: A cohort of 3402 patients was enrolled; the median age was 65.5 years. Female and non‐metropolitan patients comprised 35.5% and 23.9% of the population, respectively. At enrolment, 756 (22.2%) were STEMI patients, 1948 (57.3%) were high‐risk NSTEACS patients and 698 (20.5%) were intermediate‐risk NSTEACS patients. Evidence‐based therapies and invasive management use were highest among suspected STEMI patients compared with other strata (angiography: STEMI 89%, NSTEACS‐HR 54%, NSTEACS‐IR 34%, P < 0.001) (percutaneous coronary intervention: STEMI 68.1%, NSTEACS‐HR 22.2%, NSTEACS‐IR 8.1%, P < 0.001). In hospital mortality was low (STEMI 4.0%, NSTEACS‐HR 1.8%, NSTEACS‐IR 0.1%, P < 0.001), as was recurrent MI (STEMI 2.4%, NSTEACS‐HR: 2.8%, NSTEACS‐IR 1.2%, P = 0.052). Conclusion: There appears to be an ‘evidence‐practice gap’ in the management of ACS, but this is not matched by an increased risk of in‐hospital clinical events. Objective evaluation of local clinical care is a key initial step in developing quality improvement initiatives and this study provides a basis for the improvement in ACS management in Australia.     

Clinical features and outcomes of hypertriglyceridemia-induced acute pancreatitis: Propensity score matching analysis from a prospective acute pancreatitis registry

BackgroundHypertriglyceridemia (HTG) is a well-known cause of acute pancreatitis (AP) and elevation of serum triglycerides (TG) to ≥1000 mg/dl is strongly indicative of HTG-induced AP (HTG-AP). HTG-AP is potentially associated with persistent organ failure and poor prognosis. Here, we compared differences in clinical features and outcomes between patients with HTG-AP and patients with AP due to other causes.MethodsA prospective AP registry was constructed in Gil Medical Center between June 2014 and May 2018. In total, 499 patients with AP were included for whom serum TG data at admission were available.ResultsHTG-AP was present in 52 patients (10.4%); these patients were younger than patients with AP due to other causes (39.62 ± 10.12 vs. 51.62 ± 17.41, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching adjusted by age, the factors associated with severity were more common in the HTG-AP group; these factors included the presence of systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Ranson’s score ≥3, acute physiology, age, chronic health evaluation (APACHE) II score ≥8 at admission, and C-reactive protein level >10 mg/dl after 24 h of hospitalization. There were no significant differences in complications or severity based on the revised Atlanta classification 2012. In addition, recurrence was more frequent in the HTG-AP group (25.0% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001).ConclusionHTG-AP occurred in younger patients and showed more frequent recurrences than AP with other causes. Although factors related to severe feature were more common in HTG-AP during early phase, overall severity and prognosis were not different between the two groups.     

Epidemiological trends of acute coronary syndrome in Shimla district of the hilly state of Northern India: Six-year data from the prospective Himachal Pradesh acute coronary syndrome registry

ObjectivesThe epidemiological trends of incidence, treatment practices, and outcomes are reported from Shimla district of the northern state of India.MethodsThe data of clinical characteristics, treatment practices, and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) diagnosed using standard criteria were collected systematically from the defined hilly geographical region of the northern state of India from January 2013 to December 2018 as the part of Himachal Pradesh acute coronary syndrome (HP ACS) registry. The year-wise trends of incidence, demographic, clinical characteristics, treatment practices, and in-hospital mortality are reported.ResultsThe incidence of ACS shows declining trends. The mean age at incident ACS is increasing without change in gender predilection. The prevalence of overweight/obesity and diabetes has increased significantly since 2013 but tobacco consumption has not changed. The reperfusion therapy has increased significantly (20.9% in 2013 to 42.1% in 2018, p < 0.01) primarily because of an increased use of percutaneous coronary angioplasty. There is a trend of increasing use of beta blockers. The use of other oral secondary preventive drugs remained more than 90% since 2013. The in-hospital mortality rate is declining (9.0% in 2013 to 6.0% in 2018, p < 0.01).ConclusionsEpidemiological characteristics of the ACS population in Shimla district are changing. The trends of use of reperfusion therapy in ST segment elevated myocardial infarction population has although increased but is still suboptimal, and there is a need for taking initiatives both at the system and population level to improve the reperfusion therapy.     

The OSCAR registry. Registry of acute coronary syndromes

The aim of the OSCAR observatory was to describe the medical management of patients hospitalised for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Demographic characteristics, risk factors, history of cardiovascular events, diagnostic and therapeutic procedures on admission and during the stay in hospital were recorded. From september 2000 to february 2001, 869 patients with acute coronary syndrome were enrolled in this survey. This sample of patients is quite similar to the one usually described in such studies with a male/female ratio of 2.7 and a mean age of 66. The initial diagnosis at entry was: 23.6% patients with unstable angina, 34.4% patients with myocardial infarction with ST elevation, and 42.0% of patients with myocardial infarction without ST-elevation. Troponins were used in 65% patients for troponin I, 13% for troponin T and should be more widely used. Whatever the inclusion diagnosis, planned procedures or biological data, only 25% of hospitalized patients for acute coronary syndrome were treated with anti-GPIIb/IIIa. This rate of treatment was lower than expected by the guidelines published by Societies of cardiology.     

Management of acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation: the TOSCANE registry

The problem of pre-hospital management of acute coronary syndromes without ST elevation has not been extensively studied. The practitioner is faced with three simultaneous problems: suspecting the diagnosis, how to confirm the diagnosis to introduce appropriate, rapid and effective treatment, and which prognostic criteria to use to install aggressive therapy in high risk groups (anti GP lIb/IIIa, clopidogrel, angioplasty). TOSCANE is the first multicentre French registry which analyses the impact of the emergency ambulance serve in the management of these patients. There are two objectives: to gather epidemiological data about pre-hospital and hospital management by the emergency physician and the cardiologist, and to identify at an early stage criteria of "high risk" (HR) which, according to the recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, justify using the most aggressive therapies. From April to September 2003, 797 patients with suspected acute coronary syndromes were enrolled by 36 French centre. Of these patients, 780 were managed successfully by the emergency ambulance service and hospital cardiological department with or without a "Cath Lab", and included for analysis. The diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome without ST elevation was rarely certain in the pre-hospital period. The lack of formal paraclinical features confirming the diagnosis was often a handicap for the emergency physician. Although the European recommendations are well observed in the cardiology departments, their application and adaptability should be improved in the pre-hospital period. TOSCANE showed that all invasive strategies preceded by platelet anti-aggregant therapy in the prehospital period administered to high risk patients, significantly reduced the mortality and morbidity at one month.     

Baseline characteristics, management practices, and in-hospital outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes: Results of the Saudi project for assessment of coronary events (SPACE) registry

Objectives

The Saudi Project for Assessment of Coronary Events (SPACE) registry is the first in Saudi Arabia to study the clinical features, management, and in-hospital outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) patients.

Methods

We conducted a prospective registry study in 17 hospitals in Saudi Arabia between December 2005 and December 2007. ACS patients included those with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-ST elevation myocardial infarction and unstable angina; both were reported collectively as NSTEACS (non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome).

Results

5055 patients were enrolled with mean age ± SD of 58 ± 12.9 years; 77.4% men, 82.4% Saudi nationals; 41.5% had STEMI, and 5.1% arrived at the hospital by ambulance. History of diabetes mellitus was present in 58.1%, hypertension in 55.3%, hyperlipidemia in 41.1%, and 32.8% were current smokers; all these were more common in NSTEACS patients, except for smoking (all P < 0.0001). In-hospital medications were: aspirin (97.7%), clopidogrel (83.7%), beta-blockers (81.6%), angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (75.1%), and statins (93.3%). Median time from symptom onset to hospital arrival for STEMI patients was 150 min (IQR: 223), 17.5% had primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), 69.1% had thrombolytic therapy, and 14.8% received it at less than 30 min of hospital arrival. In-hospital outcomes included recurrent myocardial infarction (1.5%), recurrent ischemia (12.6%), cardiogenic shock (4.3%), stroke (0.9%), major bleeding (1.3%). In-hospital mortality was 3.0%.

Conclusion

ACS patients in Saudi Arabia present at a younger age, have much higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus, less access to ambulance use, delayed treatment by thrombolytic therapy, and less primary PCI compared with patients in the developed countries. This is the first national ACS registry in our country and it demonstrated knowledge-care gaps that require further improvements.     

Register of acute coronary syndromes in Russia: treatment and in hospital outcomes in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Data from about 50 consecutive patients with acute coronary syndromes aged > or =18 years admitted to 59 hospitals in different Russian cities were collected between November 2000 and July 2001. In addition to presumably ischemic symptoms within previous 24 hours they were to have ischemic ECG changes, documented coronary heart disease or positive markers of myocardial necrosis. Of 2806 patients included into registry 1394 (49.7%) had non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. Markers of myocardial necrosis (mainly CK activity) were evaluated in 59.5% of them. Frequency of interventions known to improve outcome was rather low: aspirin in acute phase was used in 73% (contraindications were reported just in 6%), thyenopyridines - in few cases, unfractionated heparin intravenously only with APTT control - in 11.8%, low-molecular weight heparins - in 7.4% of patients. Beta-blockers were prescribed in 55.6% of cases (with fist dose intravenously in 2.9%). Lipid lowering drugs were recommended on discharge to 15% of patients (to 20% with known hypercholesterolemia). Coronary angiography and revascularization procedures were performed in 25 (1.8%) and 11 (0.8%) patients, respectively. However hospital mortality appeared to be relatively low (3.8%). Meanwhile rates of (re)infactions and angina recurrences during hospitalization were high - 16.5 and 25.1% of cases, respectively.     

Therapeutic strategies, immediate and mid-term outcomes in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes with respect to age: a single-center registry of 488 consecutive patients

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) may receive benefit from an early invasive strategy. However, aged patients often suffer from comorbidities that may contraindicate an invasive approach and affect prognosis adversely. The impact of comorbidities on an invasive approach to NSTE-ACS in the elderly has not been fully investigated. HYPOTHESIS: This study sought to examine the outcome of an unselected population of patients with NSTE-ACS stratified according to age and treatment approach. METHODS: The feasibility and efficacy of an invasive strategy for NSTE-ACS and the 6-month outcome were assessed in 253 unselected consecutive patients > or = 70 years (elderly) and compared with those of 235 unselected consecutive patients < 70 years. RESULTS: Angiography was not performed in 69 patients (86% > or = 70 years) because of contraindications. In the whole population, the 6-month event rate was significantly higher in elderly compared with younger patients (22 vs. 14%; odds ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.9; p < 0.02). This difference was driven by the high event rate observed in the elderly with contraindications to angiography (47 vs. 16% in the elderly treated invasively; p < 0.002). On the other hand, no significant difference was observed in the 6-month event rate between elderly and younger patients undergoing an invasive approach (16 vs. 13%; p = 0.36). Contraindications to angiography-namely, creatinine > or = 1.5 mg/dl and elevated troponin I at admission--were the only independent predictors of 6-month outcome. CONCLUSIONS: The invasive approach was feasible in 77% of patients > or = 70 years. Those with contraindications to angiography showed a poor mid-term prognosis. The early invasive strategy was associated with more favorable outcomes regardless of age.