Should the duration of the insulin tolerance test be shortened to 90 minutes?

The insulin tolerance test (ITT) is a standard growth hormone (GH) provocative test to distinguish children with normal variant short stature (NVSS) from those with GH deficiency (GHD). We reviewed ITTs retrospectively in 52 short children using peak GH concentration of 7 ng/ ml as a cut-off level for GHD (peak GH <7 ng/ ml) and NVSS (peak GH > or =7 ng/ml). The average insulin dosage was 0.1 U/kg in children with NVSS and 0.08 U/kg in GHD. Hypoglycemia was achieved in all cases with an average plasma glucose nadir of 1.8 mmol/l (32 mg/dl) occurring between 15 and 45 min following administration. The average peak GH concentration was 12 ng/ml, occurring at 30-90 min. There were no serious adverse effects from the ITT. We conclude that the appropriate duration of ITT should be 90 minutes. The appropriate timing to obtain samples for plasma glucose level is at 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min, and for GH concentrations at 0, 30, 45, 60, and 90 min. The shortened duration of ITT to 90 min will reduce the time spent and also the financial cost for unnecessary samples, while still ensuring a correct diagnosis for the patients.     

Administration of arginine plus growth hormone releasing hormone to evaluate growth hormone (GH) secretory status in children with GH deficiency

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood is usually based on growth hormone (GH) response to at least two provocative stimuli. The aim of this study was to determine whether sequential administration of arginine (Arg) plus GH releasing hormone (GHRH) could be a useful tool in evaluating GHD in children. METHODS: Thirty patients with short stature (mean age 9.0 years) with decreased growth rate were tested for GHD with Arg and the insulin tolerance test (ITT). Patients with confirmed GHD (peak GH <8 ng/ml) were subsequently tested with Arg + GHRH. RESULTS: Maximum GH stimulation for Arg and ITT was 6.3 (1.0-7.8) and 6.7 (0.5-7.7) ng/ml, respectively. Peak GH for the Arg + GHRH test was 36.3 (4.3-84.5) ng/ml and significantly different from the other provocative tests. Peak GH values for the three tests were not significantly correlated between tests or with clinical parameters. There were no significant differences in Arg + GHRH results between children with or without abnormal hypothalamic-pituitary MRI scans. CONCLUSION: Arg + GHRH gave higher GH levels than insulin or Arg alone. Because of the different causes of childhood GHD (hypothalamic and/or pituitary dysfunction), the Arg + GHRH test is unsuitable .for evaluating GHD and deciding whether GH replacement therapy is indicated.     

The catecholamine response to hypoglycemia in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency syndromes and multiple pituitary hormone defects

We examined the catecholamine response to insulin-induced hypoglycemia in 46 short children evaluated for growth hormone (GH) deficiency by both pharmacologic stimulation and integrated concentration of GH. Twelve patients had quantitatively normal GH secretion by both pharmacologic stimulation and integrated concentration of GH (GHNORM). Twenty-two patients had normal GH to pharmacologic stimulation but subnormal integrated concentration of GH (GHND). Twelve patients had GH deficiency by both tests (GHD): six had isolated GH deficiency (GHD type 1) and six had multiple hormone deficiencies (GHD type 2). There was no significant difference between the peak epinephrine, norepinephrine, and cortisol responses of GH-NORM, GHND, and GHD type 1 patients. The mean peak epinephrine response of GHD type 2 patients was significantly lower (564 +/- 561 pg/ml, p less than 0.03) compared to the other patient groups. There was no significant difference between the peak norepinephrine levels between GHD type 2 patients and the remaining groups. There was no correlation between decrease in blood glucose and either increase in growth hormone, catecholamine, or cortisol concentrations. There was a significant correlation between log peak epinephrine and peak cortisol response (r = 0.53, p less than 0.0002) of the 46 subjects. Neither the basal nor stimulated catecholamine levels correlated with the integrated concentration of cortisol. We conclude that isolated GH deficiency is not associated with impairment of the catecholamine response to hypoglycemia; impairment of the epinephrine response to hypoglycemia is only associated with multiple pituitary hormone deficiencies; in children, the degree of glucose lowering is not correlated with the magnitude of peak GH, catecholamine, or cortisol responses.     

Are factors at diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in childhood associated with persistence of growth hormone deficiency into adult life?

A proportion of children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) have persistence of GHD as young adults. To date, no markers have been shown in childhood to have predictive value in determining persistence of GHD into adult life. We examined the hypothesis in 31 patients that variables present at the time of diagnosis of childhood-onset GHD, or those related to the early response to growth hormone (GH) therapy, are associated with the likelihood of persistence of GHD. The results show that, as previously demonstrated, children with GHD are more likely to have persistent severe GHD in adult life when the diagnosis is associated with other pituitary hormone deficiencies (p = 0.02), abnormal pituitary neuroimaging (p = 0.003), induced puberty (p = 0.001), early age of diagnosis (p = 0.03) and lower peak GH response at the first dynamic GH test in childhood (p = 0.02). However, there are no associations of persistent severe GHD with the pattern of pretreatment growth or growth response to GH treatment in the initial phase.     

High prevalence of eosinophilia in growth hormone-deficient children

BACKGROUND: To determine the clinical significance of eosinophilia in growth-hormone (GH)-deficient children, a clinical study consisting of 72 children and adolescents (mean age 9 years and 6 months at diagnosis) with GH deficiency (GHD) was undertaken. Patients were treated with GH, along with supplementation for the combined deficiency in patients with multiple hormone deficiency. METHODS: A complete blood count and hemogram with microscopic examination of a peripheral blood smear was performed. RESULTS: Before treatment, differential eosinophil counts exceeded 5% in 30 subjects (41.7%) and absolute eosinophil counts were >350 /microL in 27 subjects (37.5%). Growth hormone therapy did not significantly affect eosinophil counts. There was an inverse relationship between absolute eosinophil count and peak GH value in response to the L-dopa stimulation test (n=65; Rs=-0.252; P=0.044). CONCLUSIONS: For the diagnosis of GHD, one should take into account that GH response to L-dopa stimulation can be selectively blunted in patients with eosinophilia.     

Growth hormone secretion following administration of growth hormone releasing hormone in constitutional short stature and idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

A stimulation test using 1 microgram growth-hormone-releasing factor (GRF 1-29 X NH2)/kg bodyweight was performed in children with familial short stature and in children with constitutional delay of growth and development. The GH secretion induced by this means was not different in these groups, but there was a difference in the response between normal children and children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency (GHD). GH secretion after GRF administration was significantly lower in the GHD group than in the other groups. However, 6 of 24 patients with GHD responded to the test with a normal increase in GH (greater than 10 ng/ml), and 11 with an intermediate response (2-10 ng/ml). Thus, the test does not differentiate individual patients with defective growth hormone secretion from normal short children.     

Screening test for growth hormone deficiency: Usefulness of L-dopa-propranolol provocative test

This is a retrospective review of 185 short children who were tested for growth hormone (GH) secretion using the L-dopa-propranolol provocative test. One hundred and thirty-three children were deemed to have passed the screening test when a GH concentration of greater than 15 miu/L was elicited after stimulation. Fifty-two failed the screening test, of which 33 were diagnosed as having growth hormone deficiency (GHD) when they had inadequate growth hormone response to insulin-induced hypoglycaemia. The other 19 were low-responders since they showed adequate GH response to insulin tolerance test (ITT). The low-responder rate to L-dopa-propranolol provocative test among short children who are not GH deficient was 12.5%. The low cost of L-dopa and propranolol, the simplicity and safety of the test, and the acceptable rate of low-responders make the test an effective screening test for GHD.     

Diagnostic value of growth hormone-releasing hormone test in children and adolescents with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency

Average growth hormone (GH) peaks following an i.v. growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) 1–29 stimulation test were significantly lower in 48 children and adolescents with GH deficiency (GHD) than in 20 age-matched controls (15.2+12.7 vs 37.5+28.1 ng/ml, 2P<0.001). Twelve patients exhibited a low GH peak (<5 ng/ml), 27 demonstrated a normal response (>10 ng/ml) and 9 showed an intermediate rise in plasma GH (5–10 ng/ml). Six of the 12 patients with low GH response to the first GHRH stimulation failed to respond to two other tests immediately before and after a 1 week priming with s.c. GHRH. These subjects with subnormal GH increase at repeat testing had total GHD (TGHD) and multiple pituitary hormone deficiency (MPHD) and had suffered from perinatal distress. On the contrary, 26 of 27 patients with normal GH response to the first test had isolated GHD and only a minority (8/27) had signs of perinatal distress. It is concluded that perinatal injuries primarily damage pituitary structures and that a pituitary defect more probably underlies more severe forms (TGHD and MPHD) of GHD.Presented in part at the 7th Meeting of the Italian Society for Paediatric Endocrinology (Milan, 20–21 October 1989)     

Use of magnetic resonance imaging in short stature: data from National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) Substudy 8

The primary use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the evaluation of children with short stature (SS) is to discover lesions in the central nervous system (CNS), particularly tumors that may require intervention. MRI has a secondary role in identifying structural abnormalities responsible for growth hormone deficiency (GHD). We examined data from the National Cooperative Growth Study (NCGS) Substudy 8 to determine how American physicians are using MRI in evaluating children with SS. Of the 21,738 short children enrolled in NCGS, 5% underwent MRI during their follow-up. Children who had GH stimulation testing were more likely to have had an MRI than those in whom no GH stimulation test was performed (19% vs 2%, p <0.0001). Moreover, children diagnosed with severe GHD (maximum GH <5 ng/ml) were more likely to have an abnormal finding on MRI. Of these patients, 27% demonstrated an abnormality as compared to 12% and 12.5% in patients with partial GHD and normal GH stimulation test results (>10 ng/ml), respectively. Abnormalities unrelated to the hypothalamus or pituitary represented 30% of these findings, while disorders in pituitary anatomy, including pituitary hypoplasia, pituitary stalk interruption, and ectopic posterior pituitary, represented an additional 30% of abnormal MRI examinations. CNS tumors comprised 23% of abnormal findings in these patients. We conclude that MRI provides significant value in the evaluation of children with SS, by identifying CNS tumors associated with growth failure as well as anatomical abnormalities of the pituitary. These findings are useful in confirming the diagnosis of GHD in children and identifying potential candidates for continued GH replacement in adulthood.     

Results of early reevaluation of growth hormone secretion in short children with apparent growth hormone deficiency

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that normalization of the growth hormone (GH) response to stimulation in patients with GH deficiency (GHD) and normal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the hypothalamic-pituitary area might occur earlier than at attainment of final height. STUDY DESIGN: Prepubertal children with short stature (21 boys and 12 girls; age, 5.2-10 years), in whom a diagnosis of GHD was based on a GH response <10 microg/L after 2 pharmacologic tests (clonidine, arginine, or insulin hypoglycemia), and normal MRI of the hypothalamic-pituitary area were studied. After 1 to 6 months, all children underwent reevaluation of GH secretion by means of one of the provocative tests previously used. During that time, none of the children received GH therapy or entered puberty. RESULTS: A GH response > or =10 microg/L after retesting was found in 28 patients, and a GH response <10 microg/L was found in 5. In 9 patients, the peak GH response at diagnosis was <7 microg/L to both tests used. In 8, the GH response at retesting was > or =10 microg/L and was 9.0 microg/L in the remaining child. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that patients with pathologic GH responses to provocative tests but normal MRI should be reevaluated and followed up before a diagnosis of GHD is firmly established.     

Growth hormone and adrenal response to intramuscular glucagon test and its relationship to IGF-1 production and left ventricular ejection fraction in adult B-thalassemia major patients

In patients with b-thalassemia major (TM), the anterior pituitary gland is particularly sensitive to free radical stresses. It has been reported that the GH deficiency (GHD) may be secondary to either pituitary or hypothalamic dysfunction. The duration of the disease, the patient's age and the severity of iron overload are the most important factors responsible for the defect of growth hormone (GH) secretion. Recent reports have documented a frequency of severe growth hormone deficiency in 13%-32% of patients with b-thalassemia major. All of these patients underwent GH-releasing hormone (GH-RH) plus arginine (ARG) testing. We undertook the present study to evaluate the GH and adrenal response during glucagon stimulation test (GST) in patients with TM because the GH-RH plus ARG test in patients with hypothalamic GHD may be misleading. Thirty-three adult TM patients were recruited (mean age 36.6 years). Fifty four percent were included in the severe GHD group (GH peak below 3mg/l). The IGF-1 level in TM patients was consistently low (60.3 ± 35.3 mg/l) and 86.6% of patients with a normal GH response to GST had a low IGF-1 level. These findings are also indicative of a relative resistance to GH. In eight out of 18 TM patients (44.4%), the GHD was associated with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism. A positive correlation was found between GH peak after GST and IGF-1 level (r = 0.8, p: 0.003) and a negative correlation between the age of female TM patients and GH peak (r = 0.711, p: 0.007). All patients but one had no evidence of cardiac iron overload (mean T2* 30.4 ± 8.2 ms; range 14-44 ms). The mean LVEF (%) in TM patients was no different when compared to healthy controls. However, three patients with severe GHD and normal T2*were found to have reduced LVEF.One patient (4%) had a peak cortisol response to GST compatible to adrenal insufficiency. Nausea, headache and\or hypoglycemia occurred in 3 patients (12%) during GST. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that the presence of GHD is frequent in adult TM patients. According to the international guidelines for medical practice, we believe that before considering hormone replacement therapy, a second test to confirm the diagnosis of GHD and adrenal insufficiency is required.     

Growth hormone (GH) provocation tests and the response to GH treatment in GH deficiency.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors, particularly the growth hormone (GH) provocation test result, affecting growth response to GH treatment in children with GH deficiency (GHD). SUBJECTS: A total of 337 prepubertal GHD patients aged <10 years from the UK Pharmacia KIGS database (GH response to provocation test <20 mU/l). OUTCOME MEASURE: Annual change in height standard deviation score (SDS) (revised UK reference) in the first and second years of treatment. RESULTS: Height increased by 0.74 SDS units (SD 0.39) in the first year of treatment and 0.37 units (SD 0.27) in the second. Adjusting for age, height, weight, midparent height, and injection frequency, the strongest predictor of first year growth response was the GH provocation test result; halving the result predicted an extra height increment of 0.09 units (p<0.0001). It predicted the second year response less well (p<0.0002) and after adjusting for the first year response was not predictive at all. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients referred for possible GHD, the GH provocation test, though not a gold standard for diagnosis, is a valuable predictor of growth response in the first year of treatment. A year's treatment is recommended for cases with a marginal provocation test result, with the option to continue treatment if the response is adequate. The value of unified protocols for single or repeated provocation tests needs to be assessed.     

Evaluation of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein-3 generation test in short stature

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and idiopathic short stature (ISS) based on GH tests and basal IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels may be difficult. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of pharmacological GH tests, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 generation test and height velocity off-treatment in the evaluation of GHD and ISS. METHODS: Thirty-three (17 M, 16 F) prepubertal short (height SDS < -2) children were divided into two groups: Group 1 (n = 19) with peak GH level <10 tg/l (GHD) and Group 2 (n = 14) GH > or =10 microg/l in two sex steroid primed pharmacological GH tests. Having excluded other diagnoses, Group 2 was regarded as having ISS. The generation test was performed concomitantly (0.1 IU/kg GH s.c. for 4 days) with IGF-I and IGFBP-3 measured on the 4th day in both groups. The patients were followed for a year for height velocity (HV). RESULTS: Group 1 and 2 had comparable height SDS (-2.3 +/- 0.4 and -2.3 +/- 0.3) at comparable ages (7.8 +/- 2.8 and 7.0 +/- 2.7 yr). Although the deltaIGF-I response was low (<2.0 nmol/l 115 ng/ ml]) in seven (37%) children in the GHD group, all GHD patients with low height velocity had adequate (> or =14 nmol/I [400 ng/ml]) deltaIGFBP-3 response. deltaIGFBP-3 in the generation test showed a negative correlation with HV (p = 0.021, r = -0.570) and also with basal IGFBP-3 (p <0.001, r = -0.743) in the GHD group. In the ISS group, deltaIGF-I and deltaIGFBP-3 responses were low in 31% and 7%, respectively, and the correlation between basal IGF-I, IGFBP-3 and HV and between delta values in the generation test were significantly positive, pointing to a difference in the growth response of these children. CONCLUSION: In the GHD group, based on pharmacological tests, an adequate deltaIGFBP-3 response in the generation test predicts poor height velocity at follow up and thus strengthens the diagnosis of true GHD.     

Growth hormone deficiency: new approaches to the diagnosis

International consensus statements based on expert experience recommended guide lines how to diagnose GHD. Most recommendations reached only a low level of evidence. Cut-offs for GH were central part of these recommendations, their definition however was arbitrary. Evidence based cut-offs are needed. Using newborn screening cards from healthy and affected newborns, the GH cut-off to detect severe congenital GHD was reassessed and redefined. A GH cut-off level of 7 microg/L confirmed the diagnosis of severe GHD with 100% sensitivity and 98% specificity on the basis of our assay method, if clinical evidence was present. The previous cut-off of 20 microg/L cited in the international consensus statements was based on old GH assays methods not used anymore. For the calculation of an non-arbitrary GH cut-off for biochemical testing in children, we defined an auxological gold standard for GH deficiency: non-familial short stature due to catch-down growth during the childhood phase of growth in combination with an effective catch-up growth in response to low-dose GH therapy, after exclusion of alternative growth disorders and other potential confounders of growth velocity (true positives). Reference cohorts were normally growing children with Turner syndrome or SGA short stature having the same age (true negatives). Using our in-house GH RIA, highest diagnostic accuracy was provided at a peak GH cutoff during spontaneous secretion at night of 7.3 microg/L (sensitivity, 96.8%; specificity, 82.4%; AUC = 0.93). For arginine, cut-off with the highest number of true test results was 6.6 microg/L (sensitivity, 84.3%; specificity, 75.5%; AUC = 0.83). Importantly, children diagnosed GHD in the past with GH test values above the new cut-offs showed a lower response to GH. In conclusion, by use of retrospective and prospective cohort studies evidence-based cut-offs for GH levels measured in newborns and children can be calculated. By use of these cut-offs, tests can be improved. Because of the well known intrinsic diagnostic inaccuracy of any GH test, the correct selection of the child to be tested remains of utmost importance. The diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in childhood is guided by recommendations of national and international consensus statements which are based on the experience of experts. Most of these recommendations reach only a low level of evidence. Research on two central topics of these guidelines has recently been published by us and will be reviewed here.     

Growth hormone (GH) provocation tests and the response to GH treatment in GH deficiency

Objective: To identify factors, particularly the growth hormone (GH) provocation test result, affecting growth response to GH treatment in children with GH deficiency (GHD). Subjects: A total of 337 prepubertal GHD patients aged <10 years from the UK Pharmacia KIGS database (GH response to provocation test <20 mU/l). Outcome measure: Annual change in height standard deviation score (SDS) (revised UK reference) in the first and second years of treatment. Results: Height increased by 0.74 SDS units (SD 0.39) in the first year of treatment and 0.37 units (SD 0.27) in the second. Adjusting for age, height, weight, midparent height, and injection frequency, the strongest predictor of first year growth response was the GH provocation test result; halving the result predicted an extra height increment of 0.09 units (p<0.0001). It predicted the second year response less well (p<0.0002) and after adjusting for the first year response was not predictive at all. Conclusions: Among patients referred for possible GHD, the GH provocation test, though not a gold standard for diagnosis, is a valuable predictor of growth response in the first year of treatment. A year''s treatment is recommended for cases with a marginal provocation test result, with the option to continue treatment if the response is adequate. The value of unified protocols for single or repeated provocation tests needs to be assessed.     

Caloric restriction for 24 hours increases mean night growth hormone.

In obesity, serum growth hormone (GH) is usually low, confounding GH assessment of short obese children. We evaluated whether 24-h caloric restriction would permit better discrimination between normal GH secretion and GH deficiency (GHD) by elevating night GH levels. DESIGN AND PATIENTS: Serum was obtained every 20 minutes 2000-0800 h before and 2200-0400 h after 24 hours of caloric restriction (8% of usual calories) in 24 normal height children [14 normal (weight for height 10-90th percentile); 10 obese (weight for height > 95th percentile)] and in 31 short children (height shorter than -2.0 SD below mean for age). All samples from both nights per child were assayed for GH simultaneously to eliminate interassay variability. RESULTS: Mean GH increased significantly in all groups after caloric restriction (P < 0.01). Obese children had lower baseline mean GH and GH amplitude compared to normal (P < 0.01); GH increased into normal range after restriction. Basal GH studies in short children were not significantly below normal. Surprisingly, some with low stimulated GH increased their night GH into the normal range after caloric restriction. CONCLUSIONS: Caloric restriction for 24 h enhances night GH similarly in short and in normal children, and thus does not increase the diagnostic utility of night GH studies in non-obese short children. Caloric restriction reverses suppressed GH secretory state of obese children, perhaps by decreasing diet-dependent somatostatin inhibition of GH secretion.     

Growth hormone and segmental growth in survivors of head and neck embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma.

AIMS: To assess the impact of treatment for embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma on spinal growth and limb length and examine the response of these parameters to growth hormone (GH) treatment. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case note review of 17 survivors of head and neck rhabdomyosarcoma followed up at a single institution. All children had been treated with chemotherapy and local radiotherapy. Growth velocity, height, sitting height, and subischial limb length SDS scores were analysed. RESULTS: Growth failure secondary to isolated GH deficiency (GHD) developed in 7/17 patients. GHD occurred at a median (range) of 3.4 (1.3-9.9) years after radiotherapy tumour doses of 46 (40-50) Gy. Growth velocity, height, and subischial limb length SDS were significantly reduced in the GHD group and improved with GH therapy. CONCLUSIONS: GH treatment resulted in a significant improvement in sitting height SDS. We discuss the unexpected improvement in spinal growth in survivors with GHD.     

A practical approach to the diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency in patients transitioning to adulthood using GH stimulation testing

To establish the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency (GHD), GH-deficient children transitioning to adulthood are evaluated by two separate stimuli 2 or more weeks after ceasing GH therapy. While 20-88% of children diagnosed with idiopathic GHD retest with normal values, those with proven genetic defects in GH production/secretion/bioactivity and patients with panhypopituitarism consistently test deficient. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) defines GHD in adults by stimulated peak serum GH concentrations <5 ng/ml if measured by polyclonal radioimmunoassays (RIA) or lower if measured by monoclonal assays. Some investigators define severe GHD by a peak GH concentration <3 ng/ml. Adult responses to arginine and glucagon testing are similar to the responses to insulin tolerance testing; clonidine, pyridostigmine, and galanin cause lesser peaks of GH. Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) combined with arginine, GH releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6), or hexarelin leads to higher peak responses than GHRH alone. Thus the choice of testing methods impacts the diagnosis of GHD in transition patients.     

Final height in Swedish children with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency enrolled in KIGS treated optimally with growth hormone

Aim: To assess final height in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) treated with human recombinant growth hormone (GH). Methods: Final height data for 401 Swedish children with idiopathic GHD and treated with GH, included in KIGS (Pfizer International Growth Database) between 1987 and spring 2006, were analysed retrospectively. Data were grouped according to sex, age and severity of GHD. Height at entry into KIGS, at the onset of puberty and near final height were analysed between groups. Results: Groups were heterogeneous for GHD, which ranged from partial to severe. For all groups, mean final height corrected for mid‐parental height was within the normal Swedish height range. In patients with severe GHD, mean final height was almost identical to mean normal Swedish height. About 16% of patients showed disproportionality (short legs) at final height and were significantly shorter than other patients. The parents of these children also demonstrated short stature. Conclusion: Children with idiopathic GHD receiving GH replacement therapy can achieve a final height that as a group is within the normal range and all achieve a height within their genetic potential.     

Usefulness of growth hormone (GH) stimulation tests and IGF-I concentration measurement in GH deficiency diagnosis

The diagnosis of growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) is still problematic for the clinician. There is no gold standard for estimating GH secretion. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic usefulness of spontaneous GH secretion test, pharmacological tests with insulin, clonidine, L-dopa, and glucagon, and IGF-I measurement in GHD. We studied 180 prepubertal, short children. Predictive values were calculated for different GH cutoff levels for each diagnostic test. ROC curves were used to estimate the diagnostic usefulness of the tests. The results show that sleep is the strongest stimulatory agent for GH secretion. The estimation of GH secretion after onset of sleep can be used as a screening test in GHD diagnosis. The insulin test has the highest discrimination. A combination of insulin test with another provocative test allows high discrimination and accuracy for standard cut-off GH level. Measurement of IGF-I is characterized by low predictive values. IGF-I level below the mean according to age indicates high probability of GHD. Auxological parameters should be the most important factor in diagnosing GHD.