Influence of CYP2C19 polymorphisms in platelet reactivity and prognosis in an unselected population of non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Introduction and objectives

CYP2C19*2 and CYP2C19*17 alleles appear to contribute to heterogeneous clopidogrel metabolism. The aims of the present study were to assess the phenotype-genotype relationship of CYP2C19*2 and *17 allele carriage and to explore the clinical impact of those polymorphisms at 6-month follow-up of an acute event in an unselected population of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

Methods

Recruitment for the first and second objectives was 40 stable acute coronary syndrome patients under dual antiplatelet therapy at 12 months after coronary stent placement and an unselected population of 493 consecutive patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome, respectively. Platelet reactivity was assessed by optical aggregometry induced by adenosine diphosphate and thrombin receptor activating peptide, and by vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation measurement using flow cytometry. Genotypes were determined with a TaqMan assay.

Results

Only the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation measurement detected significant differences in on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity between the wild-type subjects and the CYP2C19*2 (P=.020) and *17 allele carriers (P=.048). No significant difference was found between CYP2C19*2 ([HR (95%CI): 1 (0.94-1.55)], P=.984) or *17 ([HR (95%CI): 0.93 (0.61-1.43)], P=.753) allele carriage and the occurrence of adverse events at 6-month follow-up.

Conclusions

Even though CYP2C19 genotype is associated with variable on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity, it has no significant clinical influence. Prognosis of acute coronary syndromes may be influenced by a myriad of variables.Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org     

Clopidogrel effect on platelet reactivity in patients with stent thrombosis: results of the CREST Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated whether patients who suffered subacute stent thrombosis (SAT) have higher post-treatment reactivity than those who do not encounter stent thrombosis. BACKGROUND: High post-treatment platelet reactivity has been reported after coronary stenting after clopidogrel therapy and may be an important factor in the occurrence of SAT. METHODS: We identified patients with SAT treated at two tertiary care centers over a 1.5-year period. Light transmittance aggregation induced by adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and arachidonic acid, total and activated glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa after stimulation with ADP, and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation levels to measure P2Y12 receptor inhibition were determined (n = 20) and compared with an age-matched group of patients without SAT (n = 100). High post-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as >75th percentile ADP-induced aggregation in the group without SAT. RESULTS: The SAT patients had higher mean platelet reactivity than those without SAT by all measurements (p < 0.05): 49 +/- 4% versus 33 +/- 2% for 5 micromol/l ADP-induced aggregation and 65 +/- 3% versus 51 +/- 2% for 20 micromol/l ADP-induced aggregation (p < 0.001), 69 +/- 5% versus 46 +/- 9% for P2Y12 reactivity ratio (p = 0.03), and 138 +/- 19 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) versus 42 +/- 4 MFI for stimulated GP IIb/IIIa expression (p < 0.001). Of patients with SAT, 60% had high platelet reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: High post-treatment platelet reactivity and incomplete P2Y12 receptor inhibition are risk factors for SAT. Measures to uniformly determine platelet reactivity after coronary stenting and treatment strategies to improve P2Y12 receptor inhibition in patients with high post-treatment platelet reactivity should be further investigated.     

Usefulness of high clopidogrel maintenance dose according to CYP2C19 genotypes in clopidogrel low responders undergoing coronary stenting for non ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

The cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19*2 loss-of-function allele has been associated with impaired clopidogrel response and worse prognosis in clopidogrel-treated patients. The benefit of tailored therapy according to platelet function test results remains unclear, and the potential effect of genotypes on this benefit has not been addressed in unstable patients. The present study was designed to evaluate the benefit of tailored therapy with a higher maintenance dose according to CYP2C19 genotypes in patients identified as nonresponders who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Three hundred forty-six consecutive patients were enrolled and received a loading dose of 600 mg, including 86 *2 carriers (13 homozygotes and 73 heterozygotes) and 260 *2 noncarriers. Clopidogrel response, assessed with platelet reactivity index vasoactive-stimulated phosphoprotein, was significantly affected by genotype, with lower clopidogrel response in CYP2C19*2 allele carriers (p = 0.01). Accordingly, the rate of clopidogrel nonresponse was higher in CYP2C19*2 allele carriers (53% vs 41%, p = 0.04). All clopidogrel nonresponders (n = 151), including 105 *2 noncarriers and 46 *2 carriers, received high 150-mg clopidogrel maintenance doses at discharge to overcome initial low response. After 1 month, high maintenance doses overcame clopidogrel low response in only 44% of the whole population and significantly less frequently in *2 carriers than in noncarriers (28% vs 50%, p = 0.01). In conclusion, higher clopidogrel maintenance doses were able to overcome clopidogrel low response in fewer than half of clopidogrel low responders who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. The benefit of this tailored therapy was significantly reduced in CYP2C19*2 carriers. Therefore, these patients might require alternative strategies with new P2Y?? blockers.     

Cytochrome P450 2C19 loss-of-function polymorphism is a major determinant of clopidogrel responsiveness in healthy subjects

The capacity of clopidogrel to inhibit ADP-induced platelet aggregation shows wide intersubject variability. To determine whether frequent functional variants of genes coding for candidate cytochrome P450 (CYP) isoenzymes involved in clopidogrel metabolic activation (CYP2C19*2, CYP2B6*5, CYP1A2*1F, and CYP3A5*3 variants) influence the platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel, we conducted a prospective pharmacogenetic study in 28 healthy white male volunteers treated for 7 days with clopidogrel 75 mg/d. We observed that pharmacodynamic response to clopidogrel was significantly associated with the CYP2C19 genotype. Twenty of the subjects were wild-type CYP2C19 (*1/*1) homozygotes, while the other 8 subjects were heterozygous for the loss-of-function polymorphism CYP2C19*2 (*1/*2). Baseline platelet activity was not influenced by the CYP2C19 genotype. In contrast, platelet aggregation in the presence of 10 muM ADP decreased gradually during treatment with clopidogrel 75 mg once daily in *1/*1 subjects, reaching 48.9% +/- 14.9% on day 7 (P < .001 vs baseline), whereas it did not change in *1/*2 subjects (71.8% +/- 14.6% on day 7, P = .22 vs baseline, and P < .003 vs *1/*1 subjects). Similar results were found with VASP phosphorylation. The CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function allele is associated with a marked decrease in platelet responsiveness to clopidogrel in young healthy male volunteers and may therefore be an important genetic contributor to clopidogrel resistance in the clinical setting.     

Doubling the clopidogrel dose in patients with reduced responsiveness to the standard dose is associated with a limited effectiveness as evaluated by impedance aggregometry

BackgroundDifferent methods are available for quantifying platelet function inhibition. Measuring vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation is currently the most specific method for assessing the clopidogrel effect. The aim of our study was to compare different tests in view of a clinically applicable bedside test. Further, we examined whether doubling the clopidogrel dose to 150 mg/d in clopidogrel low-responder would lead to a reduction in platelet reactivity.Methods and resultsADP-, ADP Hs-, and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation were measured by impedance aggregometry in 100 patients with CAD and 18 healthy controls. Moreover, platelet aggregation was assessed by flow cytometrical detection of VASP-phosphorylation and surface P-selectin in a subgroup of 34 patients and in healthy controls. Another 10 patients with CAD, identified as low-responder, were treated with a clopidogrel dose of 150 mg/d. Thereafter, ADP-induced platelet aggregation was assessed by impedance aggregometry. Significant correlations were observed between ADP-induced platelet aggregation assessed by VASP-phosphorylation and by impedance aggregometry. Doubling the dose of clopidogrel to 150 mg/d was associated with a reduction of ADP-induced platelet aggregation in only 60% of the patients.ConclusionsImpedance aggregometry is a valuable bedside test to assess platelet function inhibition. Doubling the clopidogrel dose is not effective to reduce high on-treatment platelet reactivity in almost half of these patients, pointing to the need of a more powerful platelet inhibitor.     

Polymorphisms of MDR1, CYP2C19 and P2Y12 genes in Indian population: Effects on clopidogrel response

Aims/objectiveInfluence of genetic variations on the response of clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug is implicated. In the present study, the prevalence of single nucleotide polymorphisms of MDR1 (C3435T), CYP2C19 [CYP2C19*2 CYP2C19*3, CYP2C19*17] and P2Y₁₂ (i-T744C) in Indian population and their effects on clopidogrel response was analyzed.Methods and resultsTo analyze the prevalence of polymorphisms, 102 healthy individuals were recruited. Clopidogrel response was assessed by ADP induced platelet aggregation in clopidogrel naïve acute myocardial infarction (AMI) patients (n = 26) screened from 100 AMI cases, before loading dose of 300 mg, at 24 h before next dose and 6 days after on 75 mg per day and platelet aggregation inhibition (PAI) was calculated between these time intervals. Genotyping was carried out by PCR-based restriction enzyme digestion method for C3435T of MDR1 and i-T744C of P2Y₁₂, by multiplex PCR for CYP2C19*2 (G681A) and CYP2C19*3 (G636A) and by nested PCR for CYP2C19*17 (C806T). The effect of the above mentioned genetic variations on PAI was analyzed. Variant allele of CYP2C19*3 was not observed while the prevalence of 3435T of MDR1 (0.524), CYP2C19*2 (681A, 0.352); i-744C of P2Y₁₂ (0.088), as well as wild type allele CYP2C19*17 (C806, 0.897) associated with decrease clopidogrel response were observed. Trend toward poor response to clopidogrel was observed at 24 h with the variant genotypes of CYP2C19*2 and i-T744C of P2Y₁₂ as compared to wild type.ConclusionThe present study did show a trend toward impaired response of clopidogrel to inhibit platelet aggregation with variant genotypes of CYP2C19*2 and iT744C of P2Y₁₂ compared to respective wild type genotype at 24 h.     

The relation between CYP2C19 genotype and phenotype in stented patients on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy

Both high platelet reactivity (HPR) and CYP2C19 genotyping have been proposed to stratify cardiovascular event risk and to personalize maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in stented patients. However, how well CYP2C19 genotype correlates with HPR in patients on maintenance DAPT is less clear. We determined the association of CYP2C19 loss-of-function (*2) and gain-of-function (*17) allele status with platelet reactivity in 118 stented patients on DAPT ≥2 weeks and in 143 patients with stable coronary artery disease on aspirin therapy alone. Thirty-three percent and 39% carried at least 1 copy of *2 and *17 alleles, respectively. Neither allele was associated with platelet reactivity in patients on aspirin therapy alone. On DAPT, platelet aggregation was higher in those with *2 allele than noncarriers (P ≤ .01) but did not differ between those with the *17 allele and noncarriers. The prevalence of HPR using the 20 μM adenosine diphosphate-induced aggregation cutpoint was 34% in the total population: 26% in *1/*1 homozygotes, 49% in those with the *2 allele, and 20% in those with the *17 allele (P = .006). Determination of diplotype status enhanced identification of HPR. However, platelet function on DAPT is highly variable within diplotype groups. Therefore, CYP2C19 genotype and HPR are imperfect correlates of each other. Because both predict cardiovascular events with similar risk ratios, CYP2C19 genotyping and HPR may provide complementary information to stratify risk and personalized DAPT in stented patients than either alone.     

Common sequence variations in the P2Y12 and CYP3A5 genes do not explain the variability in the inhibitory effects of clopidogrel therapy

The efficacy of the platelet P2Y₁₂ receptor antagonist clopidogrel, which undergoes cytochrome-mediated metabolism to its active form, shows marked inter-individual variability. We investigated whether polymorphic variations in the P2Y₁₂ gene, which have been linked to platelet aggregation phenotypes, or the cytochrome P450 3A5 gene 6986G?>?A polymorphism, which largely determines CYP3A5 expression, influence the response to clopidogrel therapy. Fifty-four patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention were studied using ADP-induced optical aggregometry, whole-blood single platelet counting (WBSPC) aggregometry, and flow-cytometric analysis of platelet P-selectin expression and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation. Platelet reactivity was measured at baseline, 4?h post clopidogrel 300?mg, and 10 and 28 days following clopidogrel 75?mg daily. A further 55 patients were studied using ADP-induced WBSPC at baseline and 4?h post clopidogrel 600?mg. Patients were genotyped for P2Y₁₂ haplotype and the CYP3A5 6986G?>?A single nucleotide polymorphism. Neither genotype was found to significantly influence the inhibition of platelet responses by either clopidogrel regimen. In conclusion, common sequence variations within the P2Y₁₂ and CYP3A5 genes do not contribute any major effect to the inter-patient variability in clopidogrel efficacy.     

Common sequence variations in the P2Y12 and CYP3A5 genes do not explain the variability in the inhibitory effects of clopidogrel therapy

The efficacy of the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist clopidogrel, which undergoes cytochrome-mediated metabolism to its active form, shows marked inter-individual variability. We investigated whether polymorphic variations in the P2Y12 gene, which have been linked to platelet aggregation phenotypes, or the cytochrome P450 3A5 gene 6986G > A polymorphism, which largely determines CYP3A5 expression, influence the response to clopidogrel therapy. Fifty-four patients listed for elective percutaneous coronary intervention were studied using ADP-induced optical aggregometry, whole-blood single platelet counting (WBSPC) aggregometry, and flow-cytometric analysis of platelet P-selectin expression and platelet-monocyte conjugate formation. Platelet reactivity was measured at baseline, 4 h post clopidogrel 300 mg, and 10 and 28 days following clopidogrel 75 mg daily. A further 55 patients were studied using ADP-induced WBSPC at baseline and 4 h post clopidogrel 600 mg. Patients were genotyped for P2Y12 haplotype and the CYP3A5 6986G > A single nucleotide polymorphism. Neither genotype was found to significantly influence the inhibition of platelet responses by either clopidogrel regimen. In conclusion, common sequence variations within the P2Y12 and CYP3A5 genes do not contribute any major effect to the inter-patient variability in clopidogrel efficacy.     

Accelerated platelet inhibition by switching from atorvastatin to a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin in patients with high platelet reactivity (ACCEL-STATIN) study

Aims CYP3A4-metabolized statins can influence the pharmacodynamic effect of clopidogrel. We sought to assess the impact of switching to a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin on platelet function among patients receiving clopidogrel and atorvastatin with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR). Methods and results Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-treated patients (n= 50) with HPR [20 μM adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced maximal platelet aggregation (MPA) >50%] were enrolled during chronic administration of atorvastatin (10 mg/day) and clopidogrel (75 mg/day) (≥6 months). They were randomly assigned to a 15-day therapy with either rosuvastatin 10 mg/day (n= 25) or pravastatin 20 mg/day (n= 25). Platelet function was assessed before and after switching by conventional aggregometry and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay. Genotyping was performed for CYP2C19*2/*3, CYP3A5*3, and ABCB1 C3435T alleles. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in 20 μM ADP-induced MPA. After switching, MPAs after stimuli with 20 and 5 μM ADP were decreased by 6.6% (95% confidence interval: 3.2-10.1%; P < 0.001), and 6.3% (95% confidence interval: 2.5-10.2%; P = 0.002), respectively. Fifty-two P2Y12 reaction units fell (95% confidence interval: 35-70; P < 0.001) and the prevalence of HPR decreased (24%; P < 0.001). Pharmacodynamic effects were similar after rosuvastatin and pravastatin therapy. In addition to smoking status, the combination of calcium channel blocker usage and ABCB1 C3435T genotype significantly affected the change of 20 μM ADP-induced MPA. Conclusions Among PCI-treated patients with HPR during co-administration of clopidogrel and atorvastatin, switching to a non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin can significantly decrease platelet reactivity and the prevalence of HPR. This switching effect appears similar irrespective of the type of non-CYP3A4-metabolized statin.     

Near patient anti-platelet response testing over time and gene analysis in patients admitted with acute coronary syndromes

We sought to assess the relationships between platelet reactivity at different time points, CYP2C19*2 and ABCB1 status and clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Anti-platelet response to clopidogrel was studied prospectively using the VerifyNow (VN) P2Y₁₂ assay at the time of angiography and at 30 days post procedure in 151 patients admitted with ACS who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Troponin T levels were measured at angiography and 16–24 hour following PCI. DNA was extracted and the presence of CYP2C19*2 allele and ABCB1 polymorphisms were determined. Adverse cardiovascular and cerebral events (ACCE) were assessed at 12 months. High VN P2Y12 response at angiography was associated with a greater peri-procedural rise in troponin T, but not ACCE. However, VN P2Y₁₂ response measured at 30 days was associated with ACCE (p?=?0.017). CYP2C19*2 status was associated with higher VN P2Y12 response at angiography (p?<?0.0001) and 30 days (p?=?0.006) but not ACCE. Near-patient testing for clopidogrel response was associated with subsequent ACCE when performed 30 days following PCI, but not at angiography.     

CYP2C19基因多态性与氯吡格雷抵抗的研究现状

氯吡格雷是目前治疗急性冠状动脉综合征的一种经典抗血小板药物,能降低冠心病患者尤其是支架术后患者的主要不良心血管事件的风险。但是部分患者存在氯吡格雷抵抗。研究认为,氯吡格雷抵抗受多因素影响,CYP2C19基因多态性是最重要的内部因素。CYP2C19*2和CYP2C19*3是亚洲人群最常见类型,CYP2C19基因变异者,氯吡格雷抗血小板效应减弱,不良心血管事件增加。因此,常规检测CYP2C19基因多态性可指导临床上氯吡格雷个性化用药。     

Effectiveness of reloading to overcome clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Whether increasing doses of clopidogrel can overcome nonresponsiveness was evaluated. Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness was found in up to 25% of treated patients and was associated with worse prognosis in patients with acute coronary syndrome and patients undergoing coronary intervention. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was prospectively determined on day 4 of acute myocardial infarction in 200 consecutive patients, who received clopidogrel 300 mg as a loading dose and 75 mg/day thereafter. Thirty patients (15%) had ADP-induced platelet aggregation >or=80% using light transmittance aggregometry and were considered clopidogrel nonresponders. Nonresponders were reloaded with clopidogrel 600 mg, followed by 150 mg/day for 4 weeks. A 75-mg/day dose was resumed thereafter. ADP-induced platelet aggregation was reassessed 4 hours after reloading and biweekly for 10 weeks. Flow cytometry was used to determine platelet P-selectin expression and fibrinogen binding before and 4 hours after reloading. ADP-induced platelet aggregation significantly decreased 4 hours after reloading (from 83 +/- 6% to 56 +/- 14%; p <0.01). The decrease in platelet aggregation was maintained throughout the 4-week doubled maintenance dose. After resuming a maintenance dose of 75 mg/day, ADP-induced platelet aggregation returned to 66 +/- 12% (p <0.001), and 5 patients (17%) had ADP-induced platelet aggregation >or=80%. Flow cytometry showed a significant decrease in P-selectin expression (from 37 +/- 16% to 26 +/- 13%; p <0.01) and fibrinogen binding (from 84 +/- 7% to 70 +/- 13%; p <0.01) in ADP-stimulated platelets 4 hours after reloading. In conclusion, clopidogrel reloading and increased maintenance dose may overcome clopidogrel nonresponsiveness in patients with acute myocardial infarction.     

Comparison of platelet reactivity and clopidogrel response in patients ≤ 75 Years Versus > 75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Specific data about the clopidogrel response in elderly patients are lacking. The present study was performed to compare the platelet reactivity and clopidogrel response between patients aged > 75 years and < 75 years undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. A total of 689 patients were enrolled, including 162 patients aged > 75 years and 527 younger patients. All patients received a loading dose of 600 mg clopidogrel followed by 150 mg/day. Post-treatment platelet reactivity was assessed by adenosine diphosphate 10 μmol/L-induced platelet aggregation and the specific pharmacologic response to clopidogrel by the platelet reactivity index vasoactive stimulated phosphoprotein. High post-treatment platelet reactivity was defined as adenosine diphosphate 10 μmol/L-induced platelet aggregation >70%. Clinical events were recorded during 1 month of follow-up. The patients > 75 years old had a greater rate of both ischemic and bleeding complications (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). The post-treatment platelet reactivity in response to both the loading and the maintenance clopidogrel dose was greater in patients > 75 years old than in the younger patients: 50 ± 17% versus 45 ± 17% (p = 0.002) and 57 ± 15% versus 53 ± 16% (p = 0.0005), respectively. The rate of high post-treatment platelet reactivity was significantly greater in patients aged > 75 years after 600 mg and 150 mg clopidogrel: 14% versus 9% (p = 0.04) and 23% versus 15% (p = 0.02), respectively. In contrast, the pharmacologic response to clopidogrel was not impaired in patients > 75 years after loading and maintenance doses: 43 ± 21% versus 46 ± 21% (p = 0.17) and 38 ± 18% versus 39 ± 18% (p = 0.55), respectively. In conclusion, patients aged > 75 years have an impaired prognosis after acute coronary syndrome. They display greater post-treatment platelet reactivity. However, this greater platelet reactivity does not seem to be related to an impaired specific response to clopidogrel.     

Defining predictive values using three different platelet function tests for CYP2C19 phenotype status on maintenance dual antiplatelet therapy after PCI

Abstract

Published data suggests that the presence of CYP2C19*2 or *3 loss of function (LOF) alleles is indicative of increased platelet aggregation and a higher risk of adverse cardiovascular events after clopidogrel administration. We sought to determine cut-off values using three different assays for prediction of the CYP2C19 phenotype in Korean percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients. We enrolled 244 patients with drug-eluting stent implantation who were receiving clopidogrel and aspirin maintenance therapy for one month or more. Platelet reactivity was assessed with light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA) and the VerifyNow P2Y12 assay (VN). The CYP2C19 genotype was analyzed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and snapshot method. The frequency of CYP2C19 LOF allele carriers was 58.6%. The cut-off values from LTA, MEA and VerifyNow for the identification of LOF allele carriers were as follows: 10?µM ADP-induced LTA?≥?48 %, VN?>?242 PRU and MEA?≥?37?U. Between the three tests, correlation was higher between LTA vs. VN assays (r?=?0.69) and LTA vs. MEA (r?=?0.56), with moderate agreement (κ?=?0.46 and κ?=?0.46), but between VN assay and MEA, both devices using whole blood showed a lower correlation (r?=?0.42) and agreement (κ?=?0.3). Our results provide guidance regarding cut-off levels for LTA, VerifyNow and MEA assays to detect the CYP2C19 LOF allele in patients during dual antiplatelet maintenance therapy.     

Clopidogrel Resistance: case reports of CYP2C19 gene variants in suspected coronary stent thrombosis

Clopidogrel is a widely used anti-platelet agent for the prevention of arterial thrombosis. Clopidogrel is administered as a pro-drug and metabolised to its active metabolite by the hepatic cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) enzyme. The active metabolite is responsible for the anti-platelet activity of clopidogrel. Recent studies demonstrate that single nucleotide polymorphisms, (SNP's), in the gene for CYP2C19 result in significantly reduced production of the active metabolite of clopidogrel. Additional studies demonstrate that patients with SNP's in the CYP2C19 gene, including CYP2C19*2,*3,*4, and *5, have reduced production of the active metabolite of clopidogrel, reduced inhibition of platelet aggregation and increased incidence of coronary, cerebrovascular, and coronary stent thrombosis. We have been interested in determining the CYP2C19 genotype in cases of coronary stent thrombosis whilst on clopidogrel treatment and provide two case reports of coronary stent thrombosis whilst taking clopidogrel with subsequent CYP2C19 genotyping. As patients at risk of atherothrombosis in general, and stent thrombosis in particular, may be receiving or considered for anti-platelet therapy including clopidogrel, genotyping for CYP2C19 SNP's may be of benefit in the selection of appropriate anti-platelet therapy.     

How to test the effect of aspirin and clopidogrel in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy?

Dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin is frequently used for the prevention of recurrent ischemic events. Various laboratory methods are used to detect the effect of these drugs administered in monotherapy, however their value in dual therapy has not been explored. Here, we determined which methods used for testing the effect of clopidogrel or aspirin are influenced by the other antiplatelet agent. One arm of the study included 53 ischemic stroke patients being on clopidogrel monotherapy showing effective inhibition of the P2Y₁₂ ADP receptor. Laboratory tests routinely used for the detection of aspirin resistance (arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation/secretion, AA-induced thromboxane B₂ (TXB₂) production in platelet-rich plasma and VerifyNow Aspirin assay) were carried out on samples obtained from these patients. The other arm of the study involved 52 patients with coronary artery disease being on aspirin monotherapy. Methods used for testing the effect of clopidogrel (ADP-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, flow cytometric analysis of vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation and a newly developed P2Y₁₂-specific platelet aggregation (ADP[PGE₁] test)) were performed on samples obtained from these patients. Clopidogrel monotherapy significantly inhibited AA-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, moreover, AA-induced TXB₂ production was also significantly decreased. VASP phosphorylation and AA-induced platelet aggregation showed fair correlation in patients taking clopidogrel only. Clopidogrel did not inhibit the VerifyNow Aspirin test significantly. Aspirin monotherapy influenced ADP-induced platelet aggregation and secretion, but did not have an effect on VASP phosphorylation and on the ADP[PGE₁] platelet aggregation test.     

High on-treatment platelet reactivity by ADP and increased risk of MACE in good clopidogrel metabolizers

High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) by ADP, which primarily reflects the effect of thienopyridines, has been found to be an independent predictor of ischemic events in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) on dual antiplatelet therapy. CYP2C19*2 is associated with HPR by ADP. The aim of our study was to evaluate if high on-clopidogrel platelet reactivity (HPR) by ADP is associated with an increased risk of major adverse coronary events (MACE) after ACS independent of CYP2C19*2 allele, i.e. whether genotyping patients for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism is sufficient to identify those to be switched to novel antiplatelets. A total of 1187 patients were included (CYP2C19 *1/*1 n?=?892; *1/*2 n?=?264; *2/*2 n?=?31); 76 MACE (CV death and non-fatal MI) were recorded in non-carriers of CYP2C19*2 (8.5%) and 39 in carriers of CYP2C19*2 (13.2%). At the landmark analysis in the first 6 months, HPR by ADP and CYP2C19*2 allele were both significantly and independently associated with MACE [HPR by ADP: HR?=?2.0 (95% CI 1.2–3.4), p?=?0.01; CYP2C19*2 allele: HR?=?2.3 (95% CI 1.3–3.9), p?=?0.003]. At the land mark analysis from 7 to 12 months, only HPR by ADP remained significantly associated with the risk of MACE [HPR by ADP: HR?=?2.7 (95% CI 1.4–5.3), p?=?0.003; CYP2C19*2: HR?=?0.8 (95% CI 0.2–1.1), p?=?ns]. CYP2C19*2 allele and HPR by ADP are both independently associated with an increased risk of MACE in the first 6 months after ACS. HPR by ADP is associated with an increased risk until 12 months of follow-up. Therefore, both phenotype and genotype are clinically relevant for the evaluation of the antiplatelet effect of clopidogrel and for the prognostic stratification of ACS patients.     

CYP 450 2C19 polymorphisms in Indian patients with coronary artery disease

Background

Dual antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone in the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and prevention of stent thrombosis (ST). Genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19 gene involved in hepatic activation of clopidogrel leads to clopidogrel non-responsiveness and may influence clinical outcomes. These polymorphisms in CYP2C19 gene and their impact on clinical outcome in coronary artery disease (CAD) have not been studied in Indian population.

Methods

We studied 110 consecutive patients (mean age 55.7 ± 10.7 years; 90% male) taking clopidogrel with angiographically proven CAD for various genetic polymorphisms in CYP2C19 gene. Relationship between loss of function mutation and clinical presentation with recurrent ACS including ST was analyzed.

Results

Out of 110 patients, 26 (23.64%) had normal genotype, 52 (47.23%) had loss of function mutation *2 and 39 (35.45%) had a gain of function mutation *17, 7 (6.36%) patients were undefined metabolizers (*2/*17) which were excluded from analyses. Final analyses included 103 patients, with 45 (40.90%) having loss of function. Overall 51 patients had ACS, with 27 developing recurrence while on clopidogrel. The prevalence of loss of function mutation was no different between the group with recurrences and those without recurrences (55.6% vs. 50%, p = 0.7). Two patients developed ST while on clopidogrel; both had loss of function mutation.

Conclusion

CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms are common in Indian population. Loss of function mutation status did not affect the clinical outcomes. A larger study also considering P2Y12 receptor polymorphisms together with platelet activity testing, may be required to establish the role of CYP2C19 gene polymorphisms in clinical practice.     

Relation of cytochrome P450 2C19 gene 681G&gt;A single nucleotide polynmrphism to clopidogrel resistance after PCI in Chinese

Objectives Clopidogrel is a prodrug that has to be converted to an active metabolite by hepatic cytochrome P450(CYP) isoenzymes to inhibit platelet aggregation.Individualvariability of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel suggests a possibility for genetic factors having a significant influence on clopidogrel responsiveness.In this study,we sought to determine the association between the single nucleotide polymorphism of CYP 2C19 681G>A and the occurrence of clopidogrel resistance(CR) in Chinese.Methods The study enrolled 614 hospitalized patients who underwentsuccessful percutaneouscoronary intervention with drug-eluting stents were received the treatmentwith dual antiplatelet regimen(aspirin plus clopidogrel).All patients received loading doses of 600 mg clopidogrel and 300 mg aspirin.20μmol/L ADP-induced platelet aggregation ratio(PAR ) was assessed 24 h after clopi- dogrel administration.The maximum residual PAR≥70%was defined as CR.Genomic DNA was extracted from whole blood samples according to standard protocols,the single nucleotide polymorphism of the CYP2C19 681G>A was genotyped by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP) in all the patients.Results CR was found in 126 patients(20.5%).There was CYP2C19 681G>A polymorphism in the study population.The frequencies of the three kinds of genotypes(GG,GA,A A) in CR group and non-CR (NCR)group were 32.5%,47.6%,19.8%and 48.0%, 45.0%,7.0%,respectively.The frequency of AA genotype was significantly higher in NCR group than that in CR group (OR =3.03,95%CI:1.889～5.784,P=0.003).The A allele carriers were more likely to develop clopidogrel resistance compared with that of G allele carriers(OR=1.85,95%CI: 1.392～2.459,P=0.002).Conclusions CYP2C19 681G/A polymorphism is associated with the risk of CR,and the A allele carriers may be a possible genetic susceptibility factor for patients with CR.