Scanning electron microscopic analysis of acrylic intraocular lenses for microincision cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To analyze the surface quality before and after folding of 2 intraocular lens (IOL) models designed for microincision cataract surgery. SETTING: Eye Clinic and Department of Human Pathology and Oncology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. METHODS: Two IOL models now available for sub-2.0 mm microincision were studied: UltraChoice 1.0 Rollable ThinLens (ultrathin lens by ThinOptX) and AcriSmart (foldable lens by AcriTec). Eight IOLs of each model were examined. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed before and after IOL folding with a dedicated injector. Special attention was given to the optic surface and edges, the optic-haptic junction, and the haptic itself. RESULTS: Initially, the surface quality of IOLs was evaluated before folding. On SEM, smooth and homogeneous optic and haptic surfaces were revealed in both IOL models with no surplus material or molding flashes; edge finish of all optics showed no evidence of ridges. The IOL surfaces were evaluated after insertion into their injectors and after ejection at room temperature. After folding, the microincision IOLs showed no sign of surface alteration, probably because of their high water content, which makes these IOLs soft and flexible. CONCLUSIONS: Visual results and long-term biocompatibility of the IOLs are influenced by surface properties. In recent years, there has been a trend toward microincision cataract surgery. Our study shows that the 2 IOL models now available for sub-2.0 mm microincision have acceptable surface properties.     

Interaction of intraocular lenses with various concentrations of silicone oil: an experimental study

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interaction between various widely used intraocular lenses (IOLs) and silicone oils of different viscosities. Four groups of IOLs, including monoblock foldable hydrophilic acrylic IOLs (Morcher, type 92s); monoblock hydrophobic acrylic IOLs (Acrysof-SA60AT, Alcon); single-piece rigid polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) IOLs (Intraocular Optical International-IOI-65130) and a three-piece foldable silicone optic IOL (CeeOn Edge 911A, Pharmacia UpJohn) were analyzed in vitro to determine the percentage adherence 1,000-centistoke, 1,300-centistoke or 5,000-centistokes silicone oil on the IOL optic. For each IOL type, there was no statistically significant difference in the mean silicone oil coverage (MSC) of the IOL optics for the different viscosities of silicone oil. Silicone IOLs had the highest MSC percentage (79.9%) whereas hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were the least silicone-covered IOLs (7.8%) compared to the other IOL types tested in this study. It is not the concentration of silicone oil that affects silicone oil coverage. When performing small-incision cataract surgery in patients who may require silicone oil injection, foldable hydrophilic acrylic or hydrophobic acrylic lenses should be preferred over standard foldable silicone lenses.     

超声乳化白内障吸除人工晶状体植入术后远期人工晶状体混浊的研究

目的　分析超声乳化白内障吸除人工晶状体植入术后远期亲水性丙烯酸酯折叠式人工晶状体光学部发生混浊、引起视力障碍行人工晶状体置换术的原因。方法　对 19例 (2 2只眼 )超声乳化白内障吸除人工晶状体植入术后远期亲水性丙烯酸酯折叠式人工晶状体光学部发生混浊的患者 ,行人工晶状体置换术。将取出的 2 2片混浊人工晶状体进行裂隙灯和光学显微镜检查 ;应用钙特异性茜素红染色法和vonKossa嗜银染色法进行病理学检查 ;使用扫描电镜观察沉淀物的位置和形态 ;应用能谱分析法检查沉淀物中的元素成分。以透明人工晶状体作为对照。结果　在人工晶状体光学部表面和表面下可见沉淀结晶呈多种形态的不规则颗粒 ,其中光学部中央着色颗粒密集且粗大 ,周边着色颗粒稀疏而细小。这些颗粒茜素红染色和vonKossa嗜银染色均为阳性反应。能谱分析证实颗粒中含钙和磷元素。人工晶状体襻和透明人工晶状体均无相同表现。结论　超声乳化白内障吸除人工晶状体植入术后远期 ,亲水性丙烯酸酯折叠式人工晶状体混浊的原因 ,为人工晶状体光学部表面和表面下发生钙和磷化合物沉淀结晶     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2003 survey update

The sixth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 3-piece monofocal silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 1-piece plate-type silicone, 3-piece multifocal silicone, and Collamer. Two hundred seventy-three surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect lens power, IOL calcification, and glare/optical aberrations were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.     

Evaluation of 3 modern single-piece foldable intraocular lenses: clinicopathological study of posterior capsule opacification in a rabbit model

PURPOSE: To assess the development of posterior capsule opacification (PCO) with 3 modern single-piece foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) in a histopathological study and to compare the potential preventive effects of the IOL design and biomaterial in retarding PCO. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Thirty-one rabbit eyes were randomly operated on with phacoemulsification and implantation of 3 single-piece foldable lenses: a hydrophilic acrylic design, the Rayner Centerflex 570H (n = 11); a hydrophobic acrylic design, the Alcon AcrySof SA30AL (n = 10); and a silicone large-hole plate design, the Staar AA-4203VF (n = 10). Central PCO (CPCO), peripheral PCO (PPCO), and Soemmering's ring formation were evaluated 3 weeks after surgery using the Miyake-Apple posterior photographic technique. Histological sections of each globe were prepared to document capsular bag status and performance of IOL geometry. RESULTS: The acrylic IOLs (Centerflex and AcrySof) had lower CPCO and PPCO scores than the silicone plate IOL (P <.05). There was no significant difference in Soemmering's ring formation among the 3 models. Pathological evaluations revealed effective blockage of migrating lens epithelial cells (LECs) at the site of the truncated optic edge of the Centerflex and AcrySof IOLs, even in the presence of large amounts of retained/regenerative cortical material. CONCLUSIONS: The AcrySof IOL has a hydrophobic surface and the Centerflex a hydrophilic surface, but no correlation to these characteristics could be identified. The single-piece AcrySof optic geometry created a clear-cut barrier effect equal to that of its 3-piece predecessor. The anatomic profile of the Centerflex IOL shows the same characteristics. The optics of both acrylic lenses have square truncated edges that functionally block ingrowth of migrating LECs toward the central visual axis, leaving clear posterior capsules. The square optic edge was an appropriate geometric configuration to create a barrier effect. There was no effect of the biomaterial on PCO prevention.     

Effect of heparin surface modification in reducing silicone oil adherence to various intraocular lenses.

PURPOSE: To evaluate surface properties of various intraocular lenses (IOLs), including a newly fabricated heparin-surface-modified (HSM) silicone IOL, with special reference to their efficiency in reducing potential silicone oil adherence to the IOL optics. SETTING: Center for Research on Ocular Therapeutics and Biodevices, Department of Ophthalmology, Storm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA. METHODS: Five groups of rigid and foldable IOLs were analyzed in an in vitro test for the percentage of silicone oil adherence: a single-piece foldable hydrophilic-acrylic IOL (n = 9); a single-piece rigid poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) IOL with HSM coating of the lens optic (n = 9); a 3-piece foldable silicone optic IOL with HSM coating of the optic (n = 10); a single-piece standard rigid PMMA IOL (n = 7); and a standard 3-piece foldable silicone optic IOL (n = 9). After the IOLs were immersed in water and then in silicone oil, gross photographs taken. Image analysis was performed to evaluate the percentage of silicone oil coverage of the anterior and posterior surfaces of each IOL optic. RESULTS: The mean silicone oil coverage of the hydrophilic-acrylic IOLs was 5.6% +/- 2.5% (SD); of the HSM PMMA IOLs, 6.2% +/- 4.3%; of the HSM silicone optic IOLs, 6.7% +/- 3.2%; and of the standard PMMA IOLs, 20.3% +/- 13.3%. The mean silicone oil coverage was greatest on the standard silicone optic IOLs, 98.2% +/- 3.1%. CONCLUSIONS: Intraocular lenses with a hydrophilic optic have less tendency toward adherence to silicone oil than more hydrophobic designs. A foldable silicone IOL with heparin surface modification can significantly reduce potential silicone oil adherence, comparable to the level achievable with the rigid HSM PMMA designs. Two new foldable IOL styles, the HSM silicone IOL and IOLs in the general class of hydrophilic-acrylic, were highly efficacious in reducing silicone oil adherence. There is now a real choice of foldable lenses for patients with actual or potential vitreoretinal diseases.     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2007 survey update

The tenth annual survey of complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) requiring explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were evaluated. Complications were then tabulated for each of the following major foldable IOL groups: 1-piece (plate) silicone, 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics, 3-piece silicone, 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic, 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic (hydrogel), 3-piece unknown, multifocal acrylic, and multifocal silicone. One hundred forty-two surveys were returned for evaluation. Dislocation/decentration, incorrect IOL power, glare/optical aberrations, and IOL calcification were the most common reasons for removing foldable IOLs. Good surgical technique, accurate IOL power measurements, and high manufacturing standards for foldable IOL materials and designs are the most important factors in preventing complications.     

Complications of foldable intraocular lenses requiring explantation or secondary intervention--2001 survey update

A survey of the complications associated with foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) that required explantation or secondary intervention was sent to members of the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery and the European Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgeons. Preoperative data about visual acuity, patient signs and symptoms, and complications requiring IOL removal were assessed. Postoperative results and outcomes were also analyzed. Complications and symptoms for each of the following major groups of foldable IOLs explanted were tabulated separately: 3-piece hydrophilic acrylic or hydrogel; 3-piece monofocal silicone; 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic; 1-piece hydrophobic acrylic with haptics; 3-piece multifocal silicone; 1-piece plate-type silicone. A total of 286 surveys were returned for evaluation. Intraocular lens calcification, incorrect lens power, optical visual aberrations, and decentration/dislocation were the most common reasons for removing a foldable IOL. Accurate IOL measurements, meticulous surgical technique, proper patient counseling, and careful manufacture of foldable IOL materials are the most important factors in avoiding complications with foldable IOLs.     

Ultrasound biomicroscopy characterization of acrylic, silicone, and polymethyl methacrylate lenses in vitro

Background: This study aims to characterize the reflective properties of some commonly used intraocular lenses (IOLs) in vitro, with a particular focus on lens haptics.Methods: Six different types of IOLs, representative of silicone, acrylic, and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), single, multipiece, and multifocal were imaged using high-resolution ultrasound biomicroscopy (UBM).Results: Reflectivity patterns were distinct to the material that was being imaged irrespective of whether the part being imaged was the haptic or optic. Acrylic haptics demonstrated a single “tram-track” reduplication echo, whereas PMMA haptics showed multiple reverberation echoes off the posterior surface. The optics of various PMMA and acrylic lenses demonstrated a reflectivity pattern similar to the respective haptics made of the same material. Silicone optics displayed clear delineation with no reverberation. Both acrylic and silicone material was relatively less reflective when compared with PMMA.Interpretation: With UBM imaging, the haptics of acrylic and PMMA IOLs demonstrate unique reflective patterns, depending on the material being studied. Prior knowledge of what the lens haptics and optics look like in vitro provides information that may assist in identifying and localizing misplaced intraocular lenses in vivo.     

Folding procedure for acrylic intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To compare in vitro the effect of 2 standard methods of folding acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) on surface characteristics and bacterial adhesion. SETTING: Eye Clinic and Department of Health-Microbiology Unit, University of Florence, Florence, Italy. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of folding, 2 types of acrylic IOLs were not folded or folded with a forceps or an injector and then processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examination. Bacterial adhesion was assessed using an ocular isolate of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Nonfolded and folded IOLs were placed in test tubes containing the bacterial suspension for direct counting of viable adherent bacteria and for SEM. RESULTS: The injector-folded IOLs did not show major alterations on the surface; 5 of the 9 forceps-folded IOLs showed marks or scratches in the profile of the optic. The mean number of viable adherent bacteria per area of IOL optic was 1082 (95% confidence interval [CI], 835-1330) in forceps-folded IOLs, 366 (95% CI, 192-359) in injector-folded IOLs, and 206 (95% CI, 123-289) in nonfolded IOLs. Scanning electron microscopy confirmed more surface irregularities on forceps-folded IOLs, with bacteria adherent preferentially on the surface scratches. CONCLUSION: Forceps-folding provoked more surface irregularities, which probably make IOLs more susceptible to bacterial adhesion.     

Surface abnormalities on hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses implanted by an injector

PURPOSE: To describe and evaluate abnormalities on the surface of hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were implanted using an injector. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria. METHODS: This study comprised 70 eyes having phacoemulsification and implantation of an EasAcryl (n = 50) or Inject-A (n = 20) IOL. Both hydrophilic IOLs are biconvex and have a high water content (26%), plate-haptic design, and no angulation. The IOLs were folded in a cartridge under hydroxypropyl methylcellulose and implanted by an injector. RESULTS: Thirteen EasAcryl and 5 Inject-A IOLs had multiple white lines in the direction of the longitudinal axis on the posterior surface immediately after implantation. On 1 EasAcryl IOL, the white lines were separated by a clear central zone and were on the anterior surface. Another EasAcryl IOL had a 1.0 mm crack. CONCLUSIONS: The abnormalities on the posterior surface of high-water-content hydrophilic acrylic IOLs disappeared or were almost gone within 1 month postoperatively and do not appear to be a concern for surgeons. These abnormalities are likely the result of the IOLs' hydrophilicity and high water content and friction in the injector barrel.     

Scanning electron microscopy study of different one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses after injection through microincisional cataract surgery cartridges

International Ophthalmology - To evaluate possible surface alterations of different models of one-piece foldable acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) after folding and ejecting process through 2.2-mm...     

Comparison of the biocompatibility of 2 foldable intraocular lenses with sharp optic edges.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical performance of 2 foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) with sharp optic edges in terms of uveal and capsular biocompatibility. SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. METHODS: Fifty eyes scheduled for cataract surgery were included in this comparative study. A standardized surgical protocol was used, and all operations were performed by 1 experienced surgeon. Two posterior chamber lens types of similar design with a 6.0 mm sharp-edged optic and poly(methyl methacrylate) haptics were used. Twenty-five eyes received an AcrySof acrylic IOL (Alcon), and 25 eyes received a CeeOn 911A silicone IOL (Pharmacia). Relevant data were collected at a 3-year follow-up examination. To evaluate uveal biocompatibility, anterior chamber laser flare and cell measurements and inflammatory cell reactions were monitored. Cellular biocompatibility was investigated by examining anterior capsule opacification (ACO), posterior capsule opacification (PCO), and lens epithelial cell (LEC) ongrowth on the IOL's anterior surface. Factors such as intralenticular glistenings and IOL decentration were also evaluated. RESULTS: Anterior chamber flare and cells and the inflammatory cell reaction were significantly lower in the CeeOn 911A group. There was no statistically significant difference in ACO, PCO, and LEC ongrowth between the 2 groups. The AcrySof lenses showed significantly better centration and a higher density of intralenticular glistening. CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that a sharp-edged optic design is, to date, the most effective method of reducing the rate of PCO. Despite a subclinical foreign-body reaction in the AcrySof group, both lenses had a high degree of capsular and uveal biocompatibility.     

Incision sizes with 5.5 mm total optic, 3-piece foldable intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To determine incision sizes for 5.5 mm total optic, foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) made of silicone or hydrophobic acrylic. SETTING: Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University, Department of Ophthalmology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. METHODS: In a prospective randomized clinical study including 40 cataract procedures with a temporal limbal tunnel approach, incision sizes for 5.5 mm optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs were measured before and after phacoemulsification and before and after IOL implantation using calipers. Three 5.5 mm optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs were used: 2 silicone (Pharmacia CeeOn 912, Allergan SI-55NB) and 1 hydrophobic acrylic (Alcon AcrySof MA30BA). Ten lenses of each model were implanted with a forceps, and 10 SI-55NB IOLs were implanted with the AMO Unfolder injector. Measurements of the tunnel incisions at various times were statistically evaluated using an analysis of variance and the Tukey-Kramer multiple comparison test. RESULTS: Mean tunnel width before and after implantation, respectively, was 3.32 mm+/- 0.06 (SD) and 3.42+/- 0.06 mm for the CeeOn 912 using a Nichamin implantation forceps, 3.28+/- 0.09 mm and 3.42+/- 0.09 mm for the AcrySof MA30BA using a Buratto implantation forceps, 3.00+/- 0.07 mm and 3.10+/- 0.05 mm for the SI-55NB using a Fine Universal II Folder, and 2.66+/- 0.08 mm and 2.81+/- 0.11 mm for the SI-55NB using the AMO Unfolder. Incision sizes before and after implantation were statistically different between 2 IOLs (CeeOn 912 and MA30BA) and the SI-55NB groups. Implantation of the SI-55NB with the Unfolder was associated with significantly smaller incision sizes before and after implantation than implantation with the Fine folder. CONCLUSIONS: Incisions sizes of 2.8 to 3.4 mm were associated with 5.5 mm total optic, 3-piece foldable IOLs. The Allergan SI-55NB high-refractive-index silicone IOL implanted with the AMO Unfolder system provided the smallest postimplantation incision; however, the refractive optic of this IOL is 5.0 mm versus 5.5 mm for of the CeeOn 912 and AcrySof MA30BA.     

Acute haptic-induced ciliary sulcus irritation associated with single-piece AcrySof intraocular lenses

We report an analysis of 3 single-piece hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses (IOLs) that were explanted because of complications related to the presence of their haptics in the ciliary sulcus. In 2 cases, the IOL was primarily implanted in the ciliary sulcus because of inadequate posterior capsule support. In the third case, postoperative displacement of 1 haptic in the sulcus was associated with hyphema and vitreous hemorrhage. Ultrasound biomicroscopy confirmed the contact between the haptic and iris. Areas of iris atrophy were observed in all cases. Light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy of the explanted lenses revealed the presence of pigmentary dispersion on the anterior surfaces. In Case 3, the pigments were concentrated on the surface of the haptic that was displaced from the capsular bag and on the corresponding optic-haptic junction. Scanning electron microscopy also showed the IOL's squared edges and unpolished side walls. The flexibility and thickness of the single-piece hydrophobic acrylic haptics, as well as the square optic and haptic edges, may increase the risk for iris chafing when the haptics are in the sulcus. Therefore, sulcus fixation of this IOL design is not recommended.     

Complications with foldable intraocular lenses with subsequent explantation in 1998 and 1999. Results of a questionnaire evaluation

Purpose. A questionnaire was sent to all members of the German Society of Ophthalmic Surgeons to evaluate complications of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) that required explantation. Methods. Information on preoperative visual acuity, foldable IOL design and material as well as the reason for IOL explantation was obtained and analysed. We received 167 completed questionnaires for 1998 and 1999. Results. In 1998 and 1999 the most common reasons for IOL explantation were as follows: incorrect lens power for 56% of the 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic IOLs, 16% because of glare or other photic phenomena, 40% of the 1-piece hydrophilic acrylic IOLs were explanted because of incorrect lens power and 30% for IOL damage. For the 3-piece monofocal silicone IOLs, 41% were explanted because of incorrect IOL power and 32% because of IOL decentration. For the 1-piece Hydrogel IOL, 76% were explanted because of opacification of the optic and 14% because of incorrect lens power. Most multifocal IOLs were explanted because of photic phenomena. Conclusion. In addition to the most common complications such as decentration and incorrect IOL power observed in rigid IOLs, new complications associated with foldable IOLs occurred such as optic opacification, glare and photic phenomena. Some complications seemed to appear in particular IOL types (opacification: SC-60BOUV, MDR), while others were observed in all types of foldable lenses. Accurate calculation of the IOL power and further improvement of the IOL material and design seem to be necessary to minimise the rate of explantations.     

Adhesion of lens capsule to intraocular lenses of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and acrylic foldable materials: an experimental study

AIMS—To investigate the adhesion characteristics of several intraocular lenses (IOLs) to the simulated and rabbit lens capsule.
METHODS—Adhesive force to bovine collagen sheets was measured in water with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), three piece silicone, and acrylic foldable IOLs. In rabbit eyes, phacoemulsification and IOL implantation were performed. Three weeks later, adhesion between the anterior/posterior capsules and IOL optic was tested, and the capsule was examined histologically.
RESULTS—The mean adhesive force to the collagen sheet was 1697 (SD 286) mg for acrylic foldable, 583 (49) mg for PMMA, and 0 mg for silicone IOLs (p=0.0003, Kruskal-Wallis test). Scores (0-5) of adhesion between rabbit anterior capsule and IOL optic were 4.50 (0.55) for acrylic foldable, 3.20 (0.84) for PMMA, and 0.40 (0.55) for silicone IOLs (p=0.004). Scores between rabbit posterior capsule and IOL optic displayed a similar tendency; 4.50 (0.84) for acrylic foldable, 3.00 (1.00) for PMMA, and 0.40 (0.55) for silicone IOLs (p=0.021). Histological observation indicated that the edge of IOL optic suppressed the migration of lens epithelial cells towards the centre of the posterior capsule. This inhibitory effect was most pronounced with acrylic foldable IOL and least with silicone IOL.
CONCLUSIONS—The acrylic foldable IOL adhered to the lens capsule more than the PMMA IOL, and the silicone IOL showed no adhesiveness. These differences seem to play a role in preventing lens epithelial cells from migrating and forming posterior capsule opacification.

Keywords: intraocular lens; lens capsule; posterior capsule opacification; adhesion     

Posterior capsule opacification after phacoemulsification: foldable acrylic versus poly(methyl methacrylate) intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To study the effects of foldable acrylic and poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation on posterior capsule opacification (PCO). SETTING: Department of Ophthalmology, Dokuz Eylül University School of Medicine, Izmir, Turkey. METHODS: This consecutive series comprised 157 eyes having phacoemulsification with implantation of a foldable acrylic IOL with rectangular optic edges and a 5.5 mm optic (AcrySof) (n = 80 eyes) or a PMMA IOL with rounded optic edges and 5.5 mm optic (n = 77). Evaluated were incidence, location, and degree of PCO. Mean postoperative follow-up was 17.8 months +/- 1.7 (SD) (range 16 to 22 months). RESULTS: Posterior capsule opacification occurred in 8.7% of eyes in the foldable acrylic IOL group and in 24.7% of eyes in the PMMA IOL group. The difference between the 2 groups was statistically significant (P < .01). Centrally located PCO was significantly lower in the acrylic group (P < .01). There were 3 eyes with severe PCO in the PMMA group and none in the acrylic group. Anterior capsule contraction and fibrosis were present in 4 eyes in the PMMA group but none in the acrylic group. Soemmering's ring cataract formation was detected in 3 eyes, all with the AcrySof IOL. CONCLUSION: In addition to its optic material and rectangular optic edges, the AcrySof IOL provides additional advantages in lowering the incidence of PCO compared with rounded-edge PMMA IOLs.     

Incision width after phacoemulsification with foldable intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To determine the incision size after insertion of foldable intraocular lenses (IOLs) using both a forceps and injectors. SETTING: Intermountain Ocular Research Center, Moran Eye Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA. METHODS: One hundred patients had phacoemulsification through a clear corneal wound. The incision width was measured before and after IOL implantation. A 3-piece silicone IOL and a 3-piece acrylic IOL (both with an optic diameter of 5.5 mm) were inserted using a forceps. A plate-haptic silicone lens and a 3-piece silicone lens with a 6.0 mm diameter optic were inserted using an injector. RESULTS: The wound size in the group with the 3-piece silicone lens inserted with a forceps enlarged 4.4% (3.23 to 3.38 mm) in the low-power IOL group (15.0 to 20.0 diopters [D]) and 6.2% (3.24 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group (20.5 to 25.0 D). Similarly, the acrylic IOL wound enlarged 5% (3.21 to 3.37 mm) in the low-power IOL group and 6% (3.25 to 3.44 mm) in the high-power IOL group when a forceps was used. The 3-piece silicone and plate silicone lenses inserted using an injector enlarged the wound 3.2% and 3.3% (3.02 to 3.11 mm and 3.05 to 3.15 mm), respectively. There was no difference in the wound size with higher IOL powers in eyes with injected lenses. CONCLUSIONS: Clear corneal incisions enlarge after insertion of foldable IOLs in a predictable manner, with a forceps-inserted IOL enlarging the wound diameter more than lenses inserted with an injector. The forceps-inserted lens group also showed a difference in wound size related to IOL power.     

In vitro adhesion of Staphylococcus epidermidis to intraocular lenses

PURPOSE: To compare the in vitro adherence of slime-producing and non-slime-producing Staphylococcus epidermidis to different intraocular lenses (IOLs) to study the organism's contribution to postoperative endophthalmitis. METHODS: Strains of slime-positive (ATCC 35984) and slime-negative (ATCC 12228) S epidermidis were used. The IOLs were made of poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), PMMA with polypropylene haptics, silicone, hydrogel, acrylic, heparin-surface-modified (HSM) PMMA, and fluorine-surface-modified PMMA. The lenses were incubated overnight with bacteria, then sonicated and vortexed to separate the adhered bacteria. Quantitative cultures were performed and the results statistically analyzed. RESULTS: Slime-negative strains of S epidermidis adhered to all IOLs but at a lower level than slime-positive strains. The most adherent lenses were acrylic with the positive strain and PMMA with the negative strain. The least adherent IOLs were PMMA with the positive strain and hydrogel with the negative strain. There were no significant differences between rigid and foldable lenses. Polypropylene was significantly more adherent than PMMA to the slime-positive strain. The acrylic and the HSM PMMA IOLs were significantly more adherent to the positive strain. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro, there were significant differences in bacterial adhesion among IOL materials. Slime-positive strains of S epidermidis were more adherent than slime-negative ones.