Epidural analgesia in colonic surgery: results of a randomized prospective study

Colonic surgery patients were studied to measure: the influence of continuous thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) on a postoperative pain score, the time till onset of defaecation, blood loss, postoperative temperature elevations, rate of bacterial contamination of wounds and urine, and general surgical complications. Group I patients (n = 57) received general anaesthesia and TEA for the operation, followed by continuous TEA (0.25 per cent bupivacaine) for 72 h. Group II patients (n = 59) received general anaesthesia for the operation, followed by systemic analgesia on request. Significant beneficial effects of TEA in group I were demonstrated by lower pain scores in the first 24 h after surgery and earlier defaecation. However, there were fewer temperature elevations in group II. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of positive bacteriological cultures, blood loss, need for postoperative mechanical ventilation and complications. However, there was a trend toward a higher rate of rectal anastomotic breakdown, increased blood replacement and intensive care therapy, and longer hospitalization in group I. These results do not suggest any significant beneficial therapeutic effect of continuous TEA in colonic surgery compared with a conventional systemic analgesic regimen. In selected patients (i.e. those with severe pain or those prone to develop postoperative ileus) continuous TEA may be beneficial.     

Epidural fentanyl for postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression: a randomized controlled trial

Background contextPostoperative back pain is common after decompression surgery for lumbar stenosis and often delays discharge from hospital. Achieving regional analgesia by intraoperative delivery of epidural opiates after lumbar canal decompression is a promising approach to reduce postoperative pain and enhance early mobilization. However, there have been concerns about opiate-related complications, such as respiratory depression and urinary retention in what is generally an elderly population of patients.PurposeTo assess the analgesic efficacy of bolus epidural fentanyl administered intraoperatively after lumbar decompression for degenerative canal stenosis.Study design/settingPatient-blinded randomized controlled trial conducted at two university neurosurgical centers.Patient sampleAdults (older than 18 years) with neurogenic claudication and/or lower limb radiculopathy and concordant lumbar spinal canal stenosis demonstrated on magnetic resonance imaging. Patients with previous lumbar spinal surgery, a contraindication to fentanyl, or requiring instrumentation were excluded.Outcome measuresThe primary outcome measure was patient-reported Visual Analogue Score (VAS) for pain recorded preoperatively, in recovery, and on the first and second postoperative days if the patient remained in the hospital. Secondary outcomes were duration of surgery, length of stay, and any side effects or complications.MethodsPatients underwent a one to three level lumbar canal decompression as required, via a midline incision, under general anesthesia. Before wound closure either no drug (control) or a 100-μg bolus of fentanyl was administered via an epidural catheter inserted 10 cm rostral to the operated level. Patients were blinded to group allocation, and analysis was by intention to treat. The trial was approved by the National Health Service Research Ethics Service and the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency. No commercial or other source of funding was received.ResultsSixty patients were randomized, 29 to fentanyl and 31 to control. Demographics, duration of surgery, and preoperative VAS were not significantly different between the groups. VAS in recovery was significantly lower in patients treated with fentanyl (mean [standard deviation]: 2.6 [2.7] vs. 4.7 [2.4]; p=.003). Later VAS and postoperative length of stay were similar between groups. More patients in the fentanyl group required temporary urinary catheterization, but there was no significant difference in the incidence of side effects.ConclusionsBolus epidural fentanyl provides effective short-term postoperative analgesia after lumbar canal decompression and may be a useful adjunct to pain management in patients undergoing lumbar spine surgery.     

Epidural analgesia attenuates the systemic stress response to upper abdominal surgery: a randomized trial

The effects of combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia in various endocrine and metabolic parameters were studied before, during, at the end, and 72 h after upper abdominal surgery, in an effort to further elucidate the role of epidural analgesia in the endocrine and metabolic response. 50 patients were randomly assigned into groups A and B, which received general anaesthesia alone and combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia, respectively. The effects of surgical stress in the plasma concentration of ACTH (P <0.001), cortisol (P <0.01), aldosterone (P <0.05), FFA (P <0.05) and glucose (P <0.01) were significantly less pronounced in the group of patients who received combined general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia. However, there were no significant differences between the two groups in regard with plasma TSH, T3, T4, glucagon or Na+ concentration. These results indicate that the combination of general anaesthesia and epidural analgesia attenuate, but does not inhibit, the endocrine and metabolic response to upper abdominal surgery.     

Changes in health-related quality of life and functional capacity following coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

OBJECTIVE: Improvement in survival and quality of life are the primary indications for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) operations. Among elderly patients the main goal of surgery is not necessarily to prolong life, but to improve the health-related quality of life. Factors associated with mortality and morbidity following CABG surgery have been well defined, but the quality of life and functional capacity in elderly patients undergoing CABG are poorly documented. The aim here was to investigate changes in health-related quality of life, overall performance status and symptomatic status during 1 year after CABG surgery. METHODS: Comprehensive data on 508 CABG patients were prospectively collected, including preoperative risk factors and postoperative morbidity in a surgical center and in all eighteen secondary referral hospitals up to discharge. The RAND-36 Health Survey (RAND-36) was used as indicator of quality of life. The primary outcome was change in the physical component summary, mental component summary and General Health summary scores from the RAND-36. Karnofsky dependency category was used to assess overall performance status, and symptomatic status was estimated according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. All assessments were made preoperatively and repeated 12 months later. Analysis was based on three age groups: 64 years or less (282 patients), 65-74 years (175 patients), and 75 or more years (51 patients). RESULTS: Thirty-day and 1-year survival rates were 98.2 and 96.7%, respectively. A great majority (86.4%) of the patients recovered without major complication. In all, the present data showed significant improvement in all eight domains of QOL as well as in functional capacity and NYHA class during the 1st year after CABG. However, the mean change in RAND-36 Mental Component Summary scores among patients aged 75 years or more did not reach a statistically significant level (P=0.097) and they had significantly minor improvement as compared to younger patients (P<0.05). Moreover, their General Health score improvement was poorer and statistically insignificant (P=0.817). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients not only have higher mortality and morbidity but also derive less benefit from CABG regarding certain aspects of QOL.     

Short-term health-related quality of life after abdominal surgery: a conceptual framework

We sought to develop a conceptual framework of health-related quality of life (QOL) after abdominal surgery to assist in the development of a QOL measure suitable for use in clinical trials comparing laparoscopic and conventional surgery. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 21 patients within 2 weeks after an abdominal surgical procedure. Responses were transferred into an electronic spreadsheet and coded to facilitate analysis. We tabulated the frequency of similar responses and grouped response items into areas of QOL impairment. The patients ranged in age from 19 to 78 years. Six had laparoscopic procedures. Patients identified the following areas of QOL impairment (examples of specific items and frequency of response): (1) physical limitations (difficulty getting in and out of bed 52%, difficulty walking 48%), (2) functional impairment (inability to perform usual activities 100%, difficulty bathing 90%), (3) pain (pain in incision 48%, pain with coughing or movement 28%), (4) visceral function (inability to eat 48%, lack of appetite 43%), (5) sleep (frequent nighttime awakening 62%, difficulty falling asleep 33%), and (6) mood (helplessness 28%, anxiety 24%). Acute health status after abdominal surgery constitutes a unique, dynamic health state characterized by impairment in a number of different health domains. A measure of QOL after abdominal surgery should have adequate coverage of these health concepts.     

Improved quality of life after XeCl excimer transmyocardial laser revascularization: results of a randomized trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We assessed quality of life (QOL) after XeCl transmyocardial laser revascularization (TMLR). STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients were randomized to receive XeCl excimer TMLR or optimal cardiac medication (controls). QOL was assessed at baseline, 1, 3, 6, and 12 months using three different questionnaires: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-24 (MOS SF-24), the EuroQol Standardized Questionnaire, and the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ). The primary outcome measure was the change in score between baseline and 12 months. RESULTS: TMLR patients scored significantly better compared to controls in the MOS SF-24 social functioning, energy, general health, and bodily pain domains, in the EuroQol usual activity domain and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale, and in the SAQ physical limitation, angina frequency and disease perception domains. CONCLUSIONS: QOL significantly improved after XeCl excimer TMLR compared to medication. These results are similar to reported improvements in QOL after CO(2) and Ho:YAG TMLR.     

Randomized trial of health-related quality of life after open and laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer

Background Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported improved or unchanged three-year survival following laparoscopic colon resection (LCR) for colon cancer compared with that following open resection (OCR). The aim of this study was to determine health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients randomized to laparoscopic or open resection for colon cancer. Methods In total, 285 patients (130 LCR, 155 OCR) from seven Swedish centers were included. HRQL was assessed preoperatively and at 2, 4, and 12 weeks postoperatively with the EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30 instruments. Results The LCR patients did significantly better on the social function component of the EORTC QLQ-C30 at two and four weeks and on the role function component at two weeks. Conclusion Laparoscopic resection for colon cancer improved quality of life during the first postoperative month.     

Epidural vs patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain after pectus excavatum repair: a prospective, randomized trial

PurposeManagement of postoperative pain is a challenge after the minimally invasive repair of pectus excavatum. Pain is usually managed by either a thoracic epidural or patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous narcotics. We conducted a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate the relative merits of these 2 pain management strategies.MethodsAfter obtaining permission/assent (Institutional Review Board no. 06 08 128), patients were randomized to either epidural or patient-controlled analgesia with fixed protocols for each arm. The primary outcome variable was length of stay with a power of .8 and α of .05.ResultsOne hundred ten patients were enrolled. There was no difference in length of stay between the 2 arms. A longer operative time, more calls to anesthesia, and greater hospital charges were found in the epidural group. Pain scores favored epidural for the few days and favored patient-controlled analgesia thereafter. The epidural catheter could not be placed or was removed within 24 hours in 12 patients (22%).ConclusionsThere is longer operating room time, increase in calls to anesthesia, and greater hospital charges with epidural analgesia after repair of pectus excavatum. Pain scores favor the epidural approach early in the postoperative course and patient-controlled analgesia later.     

Multimodal analgesia after thyroid or parathyroid surgery: A randomized controlled trial

BackgroundThe opioid epidemic prompted reevaluation of surgeons’ opioid prescribing practices. This study aimed to demonstrate noninferiority of a staged analgesic regimen after endocrine surgery.MethodsWe conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing analgesic regimens after thyroidectomy and/or parathyroidectomy. Adult patients (≥18 years) were randomized to study arm (A) as-needed acetaminophen + codeine or (B) scheduled acetaminophen/as-needed tramadol. Patients recorded pain scores and analgesics consumed in a study log. Clinical variables were collected from the medical record.ResultsTarget enrollment was achieved (n = 126), and randomization was even (A: 44.5%, B: 55.6%). There was no difference between enrolled patients and those who returned the study log (52.4%) by sex (P = .667), age (P = .513), final pathology (P = .137), procedure (P = .667), or randomization arm (P = .795). Most patients (50.8%) reported moderate pain scores (4–6) with no difference between study arms (P = .451). There was no difference in average consumption by morphine milligram equivalents (A: 11.5 ± 12.1 vs B: 12.49 ± 18.07; P = .792) nor total analgesic doses (A: 7.29 ± 7.48 vs B: 8.5 ± 5.36; P = .445). However, a significant difference in average percentage of opioid doses was noted (A: 79.71 ± 33.31 vs B: 27.38 ± 31.88; P < .001).ConclusionPatients reported moderate pain scores with low requirements for analgesics after endocrine surgery. The staged analgesic regimen is noninferior to combination opioids and led to reduced overall consumption.     

Postoperative pain and quality of life after laparoscopic and open inguinal hernia repair: results of a prospective randomized trial

Background As part of a large prospective randomized Austrian multicenter trial evaluating recurrence rates and complications of open and laparoscopic unilateral inguinal hernia repairs we assessed postoperative pain and quality of life. Methods Approximately 151 patients were randomized to Shouldice repair, Bassini operation, or laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty (TAPP). Pain was recorded preoperatively and on the first four postoperative days. Quality of life was recorded preoperatively and 1 month postoperatively. Results Patients having Shouldice repairs had significantly higher visual analog-scale scores for pain on the fourth postoperative day (P=0.048) and significantly higher scores in McGill pain questionnaires on the first four postoperative days (P=0.046) compared with the other groups. Apart from a significantly lower score in postoperative bodily pain in the Shouldice group (P=0.039), no significant differences in quality of life were apparent among the three methods. Conclusions The TAPP and Bassini repairs result in less short-term postoperative pain.     

Predictors of health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery

BACKGROUND: Little is known about the determinants of health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery. We determined the predictors of overall physical and mental health status 6 months after the operation. METHODS: We evaluated 1,973 patients enrolled in a multicenter Veterans Affairs prospective cohort study who completed preoperative and 6-month postoperative Short Form-36 (SF-36) health status surveys. Multiple linear regression was used to identify the significant independent predictors of 6-month physical and mental component summary scores from the SF-36. RESULTS: In multivariable analyses adjusting for baseline health status, significant predictors of postoperative physical health status were a history of neurologic disease, peripheral vascular disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hypertension, current smoking, forced expiratory volume, left ventricular ejection fraction, and serum creatinine. Significant predictors of postoperative mental health status were a history of psychiatric disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, current smoking, age, and New York Heart Association functional class. CONCLUSIONS: These predictors of health-related quality of life after coronary artery bypass surgery may be useful for preoperative risk assessment and counseling of patients with regard to anticipated health status outcomes. Factors such as current smoking and psychiatric disease may be targets for interventions to improve health-related quality of life outcomes.     

Health-related quality of life and cost-effectiveness analysis of gum chewing in patients undergoing colorectal surgery: results of a randomized controlled trial

Background: Postoperative ileus (POI) and anastomotic leakage (AL) following colorectal surgery severely increase healthcare costs and decrease quality of life. This study evaluates the effects of reducing POI and AL via perioperative gum chewing compared to placebo (control) on in-hospital costs, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and assesses cost-effectiveness.

Methods: In patients undergoing elective, open colorectal surgery, changes in HRQoL were assessed using EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaires and costs were estimated from a hospital perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated.

Results: In 112 patients, mean costs for ward stay were significantly lower in the gum chewing group when compared to control (€3522 (95% CI €3034–€4010) versus €4893 (95% CI €3843–€5942), respectively, p?=?.020). No differences were observed in mean overall in-hospital costs, or in mean change in any of the HRQoL scores or utilities. Gum chewing was dominant (less costly and more effective) compared to the control in more than 50% of the simulations for both POI and AL.

Conclusion: Reducing POI and AL via gum chewing reduced costs for ward stay, but did not affect overall in-hospital costs, HRQoL, or mapped utilities. More studies with adequate sample sizes using validated questionnaires at standardized time points are needed.     

Patient-perspective quality of life after laparoscopic and open hernia repair: a controlled randomized trial

Background

Laparoscopic hernia repair accounts for 10% of all hernia surgery. Potential benefits include reduction in postoperative pain, rapid recovery, lower recurrence rate, and fewer complications. The outcomes of health-related quality of life and patient perspective after hernia repair are our aim.

Methods

Consecutive patients treated for unilateral uncomplicated groin hernia were enrolled after evaluation for inclusion. Participants were randomly distributed to receive either laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) (group I) or Lichtenstein repair (group II). Operative and postoperative complications, operative time, hospital stay, and late complications were assessed early postoperatively, at 4?weeks, and every 6?months thereafter. Quality of life was assessed using Short Form-36 questionnaire in the first visit (after 4?weeks).

Results

One hundred and eighty-five patients of unilateral uncomplicated groin hernia were included; 88 patients (group I) were treated by TAPP, and 97 patients were treated by Lichtenstein repair (group II) with median follow-up of 17.9?months. Mean hospital stay, mean operative time, operative and postoperative complications were similar in the two groups. Quality of life showed better and significant outcomes in group I for physical function (p?≤?0.001), role physical (p?≤?0.011), bodily pain (p?≤?0.017), general health (p?≤?0.047), and total physical health (p?≤?0.008). However, mental health showed no statistical significance in its four scales, but with better outcomes in group I. Total quality outcomes showed significantly better outcomes in group I (p?≤?0.031).

Conclusions

TAPP hernia repair technique is a safe technique with low complication rate, less postoperative body pain, and better quality-of-life outcomes compared with open technique, being well accepted from the patient’s perspective for quality of life.     

Efficacy of systemic lidocaine on postoperative quality of recovery and analgesia after video-assisted thoracic surgery: A randomized controlled trial

Study objectiveIntraoperative systemic lidocaine has become widely accepted as an adjunct to general anesthesia, associated with opioid-sparing and enhanced recovery. We hypothesized that perioperative systemic lidocaine improves postoperative pain and enhances the quality of recovery (QoR) in patients following video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS).DesignProspective, single-center, double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled clinical trial.SettingSingle institution, tertiary university hospital.PatientsAdult patients aged 18 to 65 undergoing VATS were eligible for participation.InterventionsPatients enrolled in this study were randomized to receive either system lidocaine (a bolus of 1.5 mg kg⁻¹, followed by an infusion of 2 mg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹ until the end of the surgical procedure) or identical volumes and rates of 0.9% saline.MeasurementsThe primary outcome was a global QoR-15 score 24 h after surgery. Secondary outcomes included postoperative pain score, cumulative opioid consumption, emergence time, length of PACU stay, adverse events, and patient satisfaction.Main resultsThere was no difference in the global QoR-15 scores at 24 h postoperatively between the lidocaine and saline groups (median 117, IQR 113.5–124, vs. median 116, IQR 111–120, P = 0.067), with a median difference of 3 (95% CI 0 to 6, P = 0.507). Similarly, postoperative pain scores, postoperative cumulative opioid consumption, PACU length of stay, the occurrence of PONV, and patient satisfaction were comparable between the two groups (all P > 0.05).ConclusionsOur current findings do not support using perioperative systemic lidocaine as a potential strategy to improve postoperative pain and enhance QoR in patients undergoing VATS.Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (identifier: ChiCTR1900027515).     

Epidural analgesia compared with peripheral nerve blockade after major knee surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

The relative analgesic efficacy and side-effect profile of peripheral nerve blockade (PNB) techniques compared with lumbar epidural analgesia for major knee surgery is unclear. We undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized trials comparing epidural analgesia with PNB for major knee surgery. Eight studies were identified that had enrolled a total of 510 patients of whom 464 (91%) had undergone total knee joint replacement. All were small trials and none was blinded (Jadad score 1-3). PNB technique was variable: in addition to a femoral catheter (n=5), femoral single shot (n=2), or lumbar plexus catheter (n=1) techniques, sciatic blockade was performed in three trials. There was no significant difference in pain scores between epidural and PNB at 0-12 or 12-24 h, WMD 0.22 (95% CI: -0.36, 0.81), 0.05 (-1.01, 0.91), respectively, and no clinically significant difference at 24-48 h, WMD -0.35 (-0.64, -0.02). There was also no difference in morphine consumption (mg) at 0-24 h, WMD -6.25 (-18.35, 5.86). Hypotension occurred more frequently among patients who received epidurals [OR 0.19 (0.08, 0.45)], but there was no difference in the incidence of nausea and vomiting. Two studies reported a higher incidence of urinary retention in the epidural group. Patient satisfaction was higher with PNB in two of three studies which measured this, although rehabilitation indices were similar. PNB with a femoral nerve block provides postoperative analgesia which is comparable with that obtained with an epidural technique but with an improved side-effect profile and is less likely to cause a severe neuraxial complication.