The role of arterial embolization in blunt splenic injury

Purpose

The aim of study was to evaluate the results of our experience with transarterial embolization based on a modified algorithm in patients with splenic injury.

Materials and methods

We collected data of patients admitted to our hospital from January 2006 to August 2008 for blunt splenic injury. During this period, 46 patients were admitted for splenic trauma, of whom 17 were treated surgically, 15 conservatively and 14 with percutaneous embolisation (13 men, mean age 44.8, mean injury severity score 18.5, six with grade IV and eight with contrast blush). Patients in shock were referred for laparotomy and splenectomy, whereas those who were haemodynamically stable or responsive to fluid resuscitation were further evaluated with computed tomography (CT). In the presence of imaging evidence of splenic injury ranging from grade I to grade III (n=15) a conservative approach was adopted, whereas haemodynamically unstable patients with grade V injury (n=17) were treated with splenectomy. Embolisation was performed in 14 patients with grade IV injury or in the event of contrast extravasation, regardless of injury grade. In patients with diffuse organ damage, we embolised the main splenic artery, whereas in the case of localised injury, embolisation was selective.

Results

Proximal embolization was required in eight cases and distal coil embolization in six. In 13 cases, we placed magnetic-resonance-compatible coils 4?C6 mm in diameter; only one patient was treated with gel-foam injection. Immediate technical success was achieved in all cases. In 13/14 patients (92.9%), no periprocedural complications were observed, whereas the remaining patient underwent splenectomy within 24 h due to recurrent bleeding.

Conclusions

On the basis of our algorithm, it is possible to reach a quick decision on the most appropriate treatment for patients presenting with blunt abdominal trauma, and splenic artery embolization seems to offer a reliable option in those with high-grade splenic injury or active bleeding.     

Nonoperative management of traumatic splenic injuries: is there a role for proximal splenic artery embolization?

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to evaluate our experience with transcatheter proximal (i.e., main) splenic artery embolization (TPSAE) in the nonsurgical management of patients with grade III-V splenic injuries, according to the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma (AAST) guidelines, and patients with splenic injuries associated with CT evidence of active contrast extravasation or blush (or cases meeting both criteria). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The records of patients with traumatic splenic injuries admitted during a 52-month period were retrospectively reviewed for patient age and sex, mechanism of injury, injury severity score (ISS), RBC transfusion requirements, AAST splenic injury CT grade, presence of active contrast extravasation or blush on CT examination, and amount of hemoperitoneum on CT examination. Demographics, CT findings, transfusion requirements, and outcome were compared using the Student's t test or chi-square test in patients undergoing standard nonoperative management and nonoperative management TPSAE-that is, TPSAE followed by nonoperative management. RESULTS: Of the 79 identified patients with splenic trauma, 67 were managed nonoperatively. Thirty-seven patients (28 men, nine women; mean age, 40 years; mean ISS, 28.8) underwent nonoperative management TPSAE and 30 patients (27 men, three women; mean age, 37 years; mean ISS, 25.1) underwent nonoperative management. Age, sex, and ISS were not significantly different between the two groups. TPSAE was always technically feasible. Splenic injuries were significantly more severe in the nonoperative management TPSAE group than in the nonoperative management group with respect to the mean splenic injury AAST CT grade (3.7 vs 2, respectively; p < 0.0001), active contrast extravasation or blush (38% [14/37] vs 3% [1/30], respectively; p = 0.0005), and hemoperitoneum grade (1.6 vs 0.8, respectively; p = 0.0006). Secondary splenectomy rate was lower in the nonoperative management TPSAE group (2.7% [1/37] vs 10% [3/30]). No procedure-related complications were encountered during early and delayed clinical follow-up. CONCLUSION: TPSAE is a feasible and safe adjunct to observation in the nonoperative management of severe traumatic splenic injuries. The secondary splenectomy rate using nonoperative management TPSAE (2.7%) is among the lowest reported despite a selection of severe injuries.     

Nonsurgical management of blunt splenic injury: use of CT criteria to select patients for splenic arteriography and potential endovascular therapy

PURPOSE: To determine if contrast material-enhanced spiral computed tomography (CT) can be used to select patients with blunt splenic injuries to undergo arteriographic embolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 15-month period, 78 patients who were hemodynamically stable and required no immediate surgery underwent contrast-enhanced spiral CT followed by splenic arteriography. CT scans were assessed for splenic vascular contrast material extravasation or posttraumatic splenic vascular lesions. Medical records were reviewed for splenic arteriographic results and clinical outcome. RESULTS: There were 25 grade I, 12 grade II, 27 grade III, 12 grade IV, and two grade V splenic injuries. CT showed active contrast material extravasation in seven patients and splenic vascular lesions in 19 patients. At CT, splenic vascular contrast material extravasation was 100% (seven of seven patients) and a posttraumatic splenic vascular lesion was 83% (10 of 12 patients) sensitive on the basis of arteriographic or surgical outcome in predicting the need for transcatheter embolization or splenic surgery. Overall, CT had a sensitivity of 81% (17 of 21 patients), a specificity of 84% (48 of 57 patients), negative and positive predictive values of 92% (48 of 52 patients) and 65% (17 of 26 patients), respectively, and an accuracy of 83% (65 of 78 patients) in predicting the need for splenic injury treatment. CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced spiral CT plays a valuable role in selecting hemodynamically stable patients with splenic vascular injury who may be treated with transcatheter therapy and potentially improves the success rate of nonsurgical management.     

Nonoperative management of hepatic trauma

In an attempt to determine whether selective, nonoperative management of hepatic trauma might be efficacious, a retrospective review of liver injuries was undertaken. Of the 48 patients with liver injuries identified, there were 34 men and 14 women with an average age of 28.5 years. Mechanism of injury consisted of blunt trauma in 23 patients, stab wounds in 14 patients, and 11 patients had gunshot wounds. There were 12 grade I injuries, 15 grade II injuries, 17 grade III injuries, 2 grade IV injuries, and 1 grade V injury. Diagnosis of liver trauma was made at the time of exploratory laparotomy in 15 patients and suggested by abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan in 18 patients; the remaining 15 patients had a positive peritoneal lavage which led to exploratory laparotomy. Following blunt trauma, 14 patients, all of whom underwent diagnostic abdominal CT scans which confirmed hepatic injury, had nonoperative treatment. All patients who received nonoperative management maintained stable vital signs and only five required transfusion. None of the patients who were treated nonoperatively developed complications or required delayed laparotomy. There were no deaths in this group. Of the 34 patients undergoing exploratory laparotomy, 19 required either no treatment or minor hepatorrhaphy. However, 17 of 25 patients with penetrating wounds had associated abdominal injuries which required operative treatment. Based on the information obtained in this review, it is recommended that stable patients with isolated hepatic injuries, secondary to blunt trauma confirmed by CT scan, may be managed nonoperatively. Due to the high frequency of associated injuries found in patients with penetrating trauma, nonoperative therapy is not advised.     

Emergent transcatheter arterial embolization in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Splenic preservation is currently the trend for treatment of patients with splenic trauma to avoid complications of splenectomy. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of emergent transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) for hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a period of 2 years, 65 patients of blunt splenic trauma were studied. Patients with initial systolic blood pressure < 90 mmHg and showed initial response including rapid response and transient response to the emergent fluid resuscitation were included. Angiography and TAE was undertaken if contrast medium extravasation or pseudoaneurysm formation was noted in the computed tomography (CT) images, according to the criteria of American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. All patients who underwent TAE were admitted for observation of the possibility of delayed rupture. RESULTS: Thirteen hemodynamically unstable patients who were responsive to initial fluid resuscitation received angiography due to abnormal CT findings including contrast agent extravasation in 12 patients, 2 patients with arteriovenous fistula, and 8 patients with pseudoaneurysm formation. TAE was successfully performed in all of these 13 patients, including 2 patients with associated left renal injuries and 1 patient associated with bilateral internal mammary arteries injuries, without complications. CONCLUSIONS: TAE is a safe and effective procedure for treating blunt splenic injury even in hemodynamically unstable patients who responded to initial fluid resuscitation.     

Splenic trauma: can CT grading systems enable prediction of successful nonsurgical treatment?

The capability of computed tomographic (CT) grading systems to enable prediction of successful nonsurgical treatment of splenic trauma in children and adults was evaluated. Fifty-six patients with documented splenic injury were examined with CT by use of standard trauma protocols. Each CT scan was graded according to two recently proposed grading systems. The charts of these patients were then reviewed, and correlations between the CT grade and clinical outcome were determined with each grading system. Forty patients underwent successful nonsurgical treatment; three of these patients (8%) underwent delayed celiotomy for splenic rupture after failure of nonsurgical treatment. Two of these three had grades that indicated nonsurgical treatment was viable. In each of these three patients, splenectomy was necessary. In the 16 patients who underwent surgery, eight cases (50%) of CT grading errors were documented with surgery. In four cases, the extent of the injury was underscored with CT, and in another four cases the injury was overscored. It is still not clear whether the severity of splenic injury as defined with CT correlates with clinical outcome.     

Blunt splenic trauma: delayed-phase CT for differentiation of active hemorrhage from contained vascular injury in patients

PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate delayed-phase computed tomography (CT) in the differentiation of active splenic hemorrhage requiring emergent treatment from contained vascular injuries (pseudoaneurysms or arteriovenous fistulas) that can be treated electively or managed conservatively. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional review board approved this HIPAA-compliant retrospective study; the informed consent requirement was waived. Forty-seven patients with blunt splenic injury diagnosed at CT after blunt abdominal trauma were evaluated. Abdominal and pelvic dual-phase CT was performed; images were obtained 60-70 seconds and 5 minutes after contrast material injection. Scans were reviewed in consensus by two radiologists. Splenic injuries were graded with the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma Splenic Injury Scale. Patients with intrasplenic hyperattenuating foci on portal venous phase images were classified as having active splenic hemorrhage (group 1) or a contained vascular injury (group 2) on the basis of delayed-phase imaging findings. Findings suggestive of active hemorrhage included areas that remained hyperattenuating or increased in size on delayed-phase images. The clinical outcome of these patients was determined by reviewing their medical records. Relationships between several factors were tested with the Fisher exact test, including (a) the presence or absence of hyperattenuating foci and management and (b) the presence of contained vascular injury or active extravasation and management. RESULTS: Portal venous phase CT revealed a focal high-attenuation parenchymal contrast material collection in 19 patients: nine patients were classified as group 1 and 10 were classified as group 2. All patients in group 1 underwent emergent splenectomy, and all patients in group 2 were initially treated without surgery. Significant differences in management were noted on the basis of whether hyperattenuating foci were seen on portal venous phase images (P < .001) and whether hyperattenuating foci seen at portal venous phase imaging were further characterized as active splenic hemorrhage or a contained vascular injury at delayed-phase CT (P < .001). CONCLUSION: In blunt splenic injury, delayed-phase CT helps differentiate patients with active splenic hemorrhage from those with contained vascular injuries.     

钝性肝脾肾损伤的CT平扫与增强扫描比较

目的:比较CT平扫与增强扫描对肝脾肾钝性损伤的诊断能力。方法:回顾性分析临床疑似钝性肝脾肾损伤,并经手术和临床观察证实的CT平扫和增强扫描的患者84例。结果:平扫确定的损伤:肝12例,脾25例,肾5例;平扫可疑损伤:肝22例,脾15例,肾5例。增强确定的损伤:肝32例,脾40例,肾12例(全肾梗塞1例,局限性梗塞3例);对比剂外溢(活动性出血)3例;无可疑损伤。平扫无异常而增强确定有损伤:肝10例,脾5例,肾2例。增强显示的损伤灶比平扫范围明显大、病灶多、界限清楚。结论:CT增强扫描显示肝脾肾损伤明显优于平扫,延时扫描有助于发现活动性出血,应常规增强扫描。     

Blunt splenic injury: usefulness of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with a transient response to fluid resuscitation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the use of transcatheter arterial embolization (TAE) in hemodynamically unstable patients with blunt splenic injury in whom there is a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Human subject committee approval and informed consent were obtained. Angiography was performed in patients with contrast material extravasation and/or splenic injury of grade III or higher (American Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria) at computed tomography (CT). TAE was performed when angiograms showed disruption of terminal splenic branches or arterial extravasation. Among 104 patients with splenic injury, the 15 patients (10 male, five female; mean age, 36.2 years) with a transient response to fluid resuscitation were the subjects of this study. A post hoc analysis was performed for CT grades, angiographic findings, associated injuries, and hemodynamic status in the subjects. RESULTS: Among 15 patients with a transient response, two had grade III, 11 had grade IV, and two had grade V injuries at CT. Six patients had associated injuries that required TAE. TAE of the spleen and associated injuries was successfully performed in all patients. The mean systolic blood pressure and shock index at the start of TAE were 84.2 mm Hg +/- 9.2 (standard deviation) and 1.46 +/- 0.30, respectively, and those at the completion of TAE were 132.1 mm Hg +/- 18.7 and 0.77 +/- 0.21, respectively (P < .001). The fluid infusion rate within 24 hours after the completion of TAE (132.1 mL/h +/- 71.1) was lower than that from the completion of the initial fluid resuscitation until the completion of TAE (1230.6 mL/h +/- 264.8) (P < .001). CONCLUSION: TAE for blunt splenic injury can be performed successfully even in hemodynamically unstable patients with a transient response to initial fluid resuscitation.     

Value of contrast-enhanced CT for managing mesenteric injuries after blunt trauma: review of five-year experience

Objective: The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the value of contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) in the detection and management of mesenteric injuries after blunt trauma. Materials and methods: Between June 1995 and December 2000, 1,619 consecutive abdominal CT examinations were performed in the setting of major blunt trauma. Findings at CT were evaluated before patients were classified as having grade 1 or grade 2 lesions or none. Grade 1 represented the presence of minor injuries: mesenteric haziness, confined fluid, and/or small hematomas (<30 mm) within the mesenteric folds and abdominal injuries; grade 2 was appropriate to evidence of major injuries: moderate to large hematomas (>30 mm), active bleeding, hemoperitoneum, and further abdominal injuries. Results: On the basis of the CT findings, 161 (9.9%) of 1,619 patients were classified as having grade 1 and 25 (1.5%) of 1,619 patients as having grade 2 injuries. Of the 161 (77.6%) patients with grade 1 injuries, 125 were managed conservatively, while 36 (22.4%) underwent surgery. Of the 25 (84%) patients with grade 2 injuries, 21 were treated surgically and 1 (4%) patient was followed medically. Three (12%) of the 25 patients underwent laparotomy after 24 h close clinical observation and monitoring. Initial CT findings in 1,433 (88%) of the 1,619 patients were negative for mesenteric injuries, and in 1,430 of these cases no delayed mesenteric hemorrhage was observed. Conclusion: Contrast-enhanced CT has a critical role in the identification and exclusion of mesenteric injuries. Persistent, active extravasation of contrast material, in isolation or associated with further abdominal lesions, is a sign of a high likelihood of injury requiring urgent laparotomy. Haziness, isolated confined clotted mesenteric hemorrhage, and small hematomas within the mesentery are nonspecific findings and should be considered in the appropriate clinical context. Close clinical observation, monitoring, and surgical expertise are mandatory for appropriate management. Electronic Publication     

Using contrast-enhanced helical CT to visualize arterial extravasation after blunt abdominal trauma: incidence and organ distribution.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the incidence and organ distribution of arterial extravasation identified using contrast-enhanced helical CT in patients who had sustained abdominal visceral injuries and pelvic fractures after blunt trauma. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Five hundred sixty-five consecutive patients from four level I trauma centers who had CT scans showing abdominal visceral injuries or pelvic fractures were included in this series. The presence or absence of arterial extravasation, as well as the anatomic sites of arterial extravasation, was noted. We obtained clinical follow-up data, including surgical or angiographic findings. RESULTS: In our series, 104 (18.4%) of 565 patients had arterial extravasation. Of the 104 patients, 81 (77.9%) underwent surgery, embolization, or both. The combined rate of surgery or embolization in patients with arterial extravasation was statistically higher than expected at all four institutions (p <0.001). The spleen was the most common organ injured, occurring in 277 (49.0%) of 565 patients, and arterial extravasation occurred in 49 (17.7%) of 277 patients with splenic injury. Several other visceral injuries were associated with arterial extravasation, including hepatic, renal, adrenal, and mesenteric injuries. CONCLUSION: Based on the limited reports of arterial extravasation in the nonhelical CT literature, the percentage (18%) of clinically stable patients in our study with CT scans showing arterial extravasation was higher than anticipated. This finding likely reflects the improved diagnostic capability of helical CT. Although the spleen and liver were the organs most commonly associated with arterial extravasation, radiologists should be aware that arterial extravasation may be associated with several other visceral injuries.     

Helical computed tomography characteristics of splenic and hepatic trauma in children subjected to nonoperative treatment

The purpose of this study was to present the radiological characteristics of abdominal computed tomography (CT) in the follow-up of splenic and hepatic injury in children. Children (n=24) less than 13 years old who had suffered blunt abdominal trauma and were diagnosed with splenic and hepatic injury by CT scan prospectively were enlisted in the study. The CT was performed immediately after the injury was suspected, and 7 and 60 days after the trauma. The clinical course of the patients was observed (red blood transfusion requirement, associated abdominal injuries, and hospital stay). The splenic and hepatic injuries varied from grade II to grade IV of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma. The CT showed a reduction in the volume of the injury 60 days after the trauma. In this article the radiological findings will be shown and correlated with the clinical course of the patients. This study shows that CT is advantageous for detecting and grading splenic and hepatic injuries. These injuries can be managed nonoperatively in hospitals where CT is available for the evaluation of pediatric patients. Electronic Publication     

Isolated severe renal injuries after minimal blunt trauma to the upper abdomen and flank: CT findings

Renal injuries caused by blunt abdominal trauma are common in children. Serious renal trauma is associated with insult to other organs, whereas isolated renal injuries are usually minor. We present the cases of six male children (aged 7–17 years) with major isolated renal injuries due to minimal blunt trauma to the upper adbomen and/or the flank, out of a total of 21 children admitted with renal trauma in a 5-years period. On physical examination all patients had a painful, tender abdomen and/or flank with ipsilateral bruises and ecchymosis. Hematuria, either macro (n=4) or micro (n=2), was found in all. The injuries were left-sided in five and were of a variable severity (grade III: n=2; grade IV: n=3; grade V: n=1 according to the kidney injury scale of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma). Four children underwent nephrectomy. This small series underlines that major kidney insult can occur after a minimal blunt trauma localized to the flank or upper abdomen. Abdominal CT should be performed when clinical or laboratory findings or the mechanism of trauma suggest renal injury.     

Optimizing multidetector CT for visualization of splenic vascular injury. Validation by splenic arteriography in blunt abdominal trauma patients

Nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury is the treatment of choice in hemodynamically stable patients. Detection of vascular injury by multidetector CT (MDCT) is the most significant factor predicting the need for endovascular treatment. This study evaluated the timing of the appearance of vascular lesions during angiography. Images from 20 patients embolized for pseudoaneurysms (PSA) were evaluated. Angiograms were reviewed for phase and timing of PSA. Admission MDCT was reviewed for injury grade and PSA. Initial MDCT evaluation indicated grade III and IV splenic injuries in 9 and 11 patients, respectively. PSA was seen on MDCT in 14/20 (70%) patients. Time from opacification of the aorta to vascular injury was 1.32 s for arterial phase injuries compared with 2.05 s for postcapillary injuries (P = 0.097). Angiography demonstrated 15 vascular injuries during the arterial and 5 in the venous phase. Of injuries seen during arterial phase angiography, 10/15 (66%) were identified on MDCT. Of the five injuries that exhibited postcapillary-phase findings, 4/5 (80%) demonstrated PSA (P = 0.5). Vascular lesions are a better indicator of subsequent clinical deterioration than splenic injury grade. PSAs are more frequently seen in postcapillary vascular injuries than arterial phase lesions with the current timing of MDCT. In a subset of patients in whom splenic injury grades III and IV warrant angiography, PSAs are not initially demonstrated on MDCT. Therefore, alteration of MDCT timing parameters to better correlate with arterial phase angiography may improve initial diagnosis of vascular injury.     

CT detection of hepatic and splenic injuries: usefulness of liver window settings

OBJECTIVE. This study was designed to assess the usefulness of liver window settings when performing abdominal CT for the detection and characterization of hepatic and splenic injuries. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. We prospectively evaluated helical abdominal CT scans for hepatic and splenic injuries in 300 consecutive patients with blunt abdominal trauma over a 4-month period. There were 204 males and 96 females with a mean age of 34 years (age range, 1-87 years). For each patient, initial CT diagnosis of hepatic or splenic injury was made from images obtained with standard abdominal window settings. CT scans were then immediately reinterpreted using additional images obtained at narrow window width (liver windows). Changes in conspicuity and characterization of injury were recorded. All CT examinations were performed with helical 7-mm collimation at a pitch of 1.5 after oral ingestion of diluted barium and during bolus IV administration of 125 mL of ioversol at a rate of 2-3 mL/sec. RESULTS. We detected hepatic or splenic injuries in 34 patients (11.3%). There were 19 hepatic injuries and 18 splenic injuries. Three patients had injuries to both liver and spleen. Conspicuity of hepatic or splenic injuries was mildly increased (+1 H) on liver windows in 16 patients, whereas the injury was equally conspicuous on both liver window and standard window images in 19 cases. In no case did review of the liver windows result in a change in grade of injury or reveal an injury that was not seen on standard abdominal window images. The total increased cost for printing liver windows was $5748. CONCLUSION. Routine use of liver window settings for abdominal CT in trauma patients has little clinical usefulness and is not cost-effective.     

Contemporary Management of Pediatric Blunt Splenic Trauma: A National Trauma Databank Analysis

PurposeTo quantify changes in the management of pediatric patients with isolated splenic injury from 2007 to 2015.Materials and MethodsPatients under 18 years old with registered splenic injury in the National Trauma Data Bank (2007–2015) were identified. Splenic injuries were categorized into 5 management types: nonoperative management (NOM), embolization, splenic repair, splenectomy, or a combination therapy. Linear mixed models accounting for confounding variables were used to examine the direct impact of management on length of stay (LOS), intensive care unit (ICU) days, and ventilator days.ResultsOf included patients (n = 24,128), 90.3% (n = 21,789), 5.6% (n = 1,361), and 2.7% (n = 640) had NOM, splenectomy, and embolization, respectively. From 2007 to 2015, the rate of embolization increased from 1.5% to 3.5%, and the rate of splenectomy decreased from 6.9% to 4.4%. Combining injury grades, NOM was associated with the shortest LOS (5.1 days), ICU days (1.9 days), and ventilator days (0.5 day). Moreover, splenectomy was associated with longer LOS (10.1 days), ICU days (4.5 days), and ventilator days (2.1 days) than NOM. The average failure rate of NOM was 1.5% (180 failures/12,378 cases). Average embolization failure was 1.3% (6 failures/456 cases). Splenic artery embolization was associated with lower mortality than splenectomy (OR: 0.10, P <.001). No statistically significant difference was observed in mortality between embolization and NOM (OR: 0.96, P = 1.0).ConclusionsIn pediatric splenic injury, NOM is the most utilized and associated with favorable outcomes, most notably in grades III to V pediatric splenic injury. If intervention is needed, embolization is effective and increasingly utilized most significantly in lower grade injuries.     

Splenic Artery Embolization for Unstable Patients with Splenic Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

PurposeTo compare the outcomes of splenic artery embolization (SAE) for acute splenic injury (ASI) between patients who are hemodynamically stable (HDS) and hemodynamically unstable (HDU). Nonoperative management with SAE has become an accepted practice for patients who are HDS with ASI; however, SAE for the treatment of patients who are HDU with ASI has not been well studied.Materials and MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed, including 52 patients who were HDU and HDS who underwent SAE for ASI at a Level 1 trauma center. HDU was defined as the lowest recorded systolic blood pressure prior to intervention <90 mm Hg. Utilizing the American Association for Surgery of Trauma (AAST) splenic injury scale, AAST Grades 1–3 were defined as low grade, and Grades 4–5 were defined as high grade. The primary outcomes were survival at 30 days and the need for subsequent splenectomy.ResultsSeventy-five percent (n = 39) of the patients were HDS, and 25% (n = 13) were HDU. The majority (69%) of patients who were HDU who underwent SAE did not require splenectomy, compared with 95% of patients who were HDS (P = .03). No significant difference in 30-day survival between patients who were HDU and HDS was noted. No major adverse events were recorded. There was no significant difference in 30-day patient survival or the rate of subsequent splenectomy between high-grade and low-grade splenic injuries.ConclusionsIn this retrospective cohort study, there was no statistically significant difference in the adverse events or 30-day post-SAE survival rates between patients who were HDS and HDU with ASI. The authors conclude that SAE can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients who are HDU with ASI, including high-grade splenic injury.     

Embolization Therapy for Traumatic Splenic Lacerations

Purpose

This study was designed to evaluate the clinical success, complications, and transfusion requirements based on the location of and agents used for splenic artery embolization in patients with splenic trauma.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed of patients with splenic trauma who underwent angiography and embolization from September 2000 to January 2010 at a level I trauma center. Electronic medical records were reviewed for demographics, imaging data, technical aspects of the procedure, and clinical outcomes.

Results

Fifty patients were identified (34 men and 16 women), with an average age of 48 (range, 16–80) years. Extravasation was seen on initial angiography in 27 (54%) and was absent in 23 (46%). All 27 patients with extravasation were embolized, and 18 of 23 (78.2%) without extravasation were embolized empirically. Primary clinical success was similar (>75%) across all embolization locations, embolic agents, and grades of laceration treated. Of 45 patients treated, 9 patients (20%) were embolized in the main splenic artery, 34 (75.6%) in the splenic hilum, and 2 (4.4%) were embolized in both locations. Partial splenic infarctions developed in 47.3% treated in the splenic hilum compared with 12.5% treated in the main splenic artery. There were four (8.9%) mortalities: two occurred in patients with multiple critical injuries and two from nonbleeding etiologies.

Conclusions

Embolization of traumatic splenic artery injuries is safe and effective, regardless of the location of treatment. Embolization in splenic hilar branches may have a higher incidence of infarction. The grade of laceration and agents used for embolotherapy did not impact the outcomes.     

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging of active bleeding associated with hepatic and splenic trauma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) imaging of active bleeding from hepatic and splenic trauma.

Materials and methods

Three hundred and ninety-two patients with liver or/and spleen trauma (179 liver and 217 spleen injuries), who underwent CEUS examinations following contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), were enrolled in this retrospective study over a period of >4 years. CEUS detected contrast medium extravasation or pooling in 16% (63/396) of liver or spleen lesions in 61 patients, which was confirmed by contrast-enhanced CT. Special attention was paid to observing the presence, location, and characteristics of the extravasated or pooled contrast medium.

Results

The CEUS detection rate for active bleeding was not different from that of contrast-enhanced CT (p=0.333). Information from surgery, minimally invasive treatment and conservative treatment was used as reference standard, and the sensitivities of the two techniques were not different (p=0.122). Of 63 lesions in 61 patients, CEUS showed that 74.6% (47/63) (21 liver lesions and 26 spleen lesions) presented contrast medium extravasation or pooling, both in the organ and out the capsule, in 14.3% (9/63) and only outside the capsule in 11.1% (7/63). CEUS imaging of active bleeding from hepatic and splenic trauma presented various characteristics, and the sizes and shapes of the active bleeding due to contrast medium extravasation or pooling were variable.

Conclusions

CEUS can show the active bleeding associated with hepatic and splenic trauma with various imaging characteristics, thus making it possible to diagnose active bleeding using CEUS.     

Hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injuries: a potential limitation of screening abdominal US for trauma.

PURPOSE: To determine, at screening ultrasonography, the prevalence, severity, and clinical outcome of clinically important abdominal visceral injuries, without associated hemoperitoneum, that result from blunt abdominal trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Computed tomography (CT) was performed at admission in 466 patients with visceral injury. A retrospective review was performed of findings from surgery and contrast material-enhanced spiral and conventional CT performed to verify abdominal visceral injuries in 467 (4%) of 11,188 patients with blunt trauma. These patients were admitted to a level 1 trauma center over 33 months to determine the presence of hemoperitoneum and to identify the grade of injury. Medical records of patients with abdominal visceral injury without hemoperitoneum were reviewed for the management required and for results of focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST). RESULTS: A total of 575 abdominal visceral injuries were identified at CT and/or surgery. Findings of CT at admission (n = 156) and of surgery (n = 1) revealed no evidence of hemoperitoneum in 157 (34%) patients with abdominal visceral injury; 26 (17%) of whom also had negative FAST studies. Abdominal visceral injuries diagnosed in patients without hemoperitoneum included 57 (27%) of 210 splenic injuries, 71 (34%) of 206 hepatic injuries, 30 (48%) of 63 renal injuries, four (11%) of 35 mesenteric injuries, and two (29%) of seven pancreatic injuries. Surgical and/or angiographic intervention was required in 26 (17%) patients without hemoperitoneum. CONCLUSION: Reliance on the presence of hemoperitoneum as the sole indicator of abdominal visceral injury limits the value of FAST as a screening diagnostic modality for patients who sustain blunt abdominal trauma.