Echocardiographic and magnetic resonance methods for diagnosing hibernating myocardium

Hibernating myocardium refers to regions of impaired left ventricular function at rest due to coronary artery disease that is reversible with revascularization. The accurate identification and assessment of myocardial viability is a critical aspect of the management of the patient with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction. Several non-invasive methods exist to assist the clinician in distinguishing those patients with significant regions of hibernating myocardium from those who have non-viable scar. This is important not only to identify those patients who would most benefit from percutaneous intervention or surgery, but also to spare the latter group from the morbidity and mortality associated with a revascularization procedure that would provide little benefit. While nuclear medicine imaging is the most widely used means for evaluating myocardial viability, alternative modalities have emerged and have gained increasing acceptance in recent years. This article will review the echocardiographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) methods that are currently available or under investigation to assess myocardial viability. These techniques include rest and stress echocardiography, myocardial contrast echocardiography, stress MRI, contrast-enhanced MRI and magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).     

Assessment of myocardial viability by MRI.

Assessment of myocardial viability has become an important issue in patients presenting with either acute myocardial infarction or presenting with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction. In patients with viable myocardium recovery of left ventricular function can be anticipatedm, spontaneously in patients with acute myocardial infarction or following revascularization in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy. In contrast, patients without viable tissue are not likely to improve in left ventricular function. Currently, nuclear imaging techniques and dobutamine stress echocardiography are used for assessment of viability; recent studies with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have however demonstrated the potential usefulness of this technique for the assessment of viability. Various parameters, derived from resting MRI, can be used as markers of myocardial viability, including the end-diastolic wall thickness, systolic wall thickening and signal intensity without contrast-enhancement. Other studies have combined the information from resting MRI with the assessment of contractile reserve during dobutamine stimulation. Finally, recent studies have evaluated the use of contrast-enhanced MRI to detect viable myocardium. All of these parameters are potentially useful and MRI provide an alternative approach for the assessment of viable myocardium.     

MRI evaluation of myocardial viability

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an accurate noninvasive imaging procedure for the study of postischaemic residual cardiac function, thanks to the evolution of MRI machines, postprocessing software and, above all, sequences. After infarction, and in chronic myocardial ischaemia, the degree of contractile dysfunction is one of the main determinants of longterm survival. The identification and quantification of viable dysfunctional myocardium and the possibility of improving its contractility after revascularisation improves patient prognosis and quality of life. In current clinical practice, myocardial viability is evaluated with stress echocardiography and nuclear methods. Thanks to its intrinsic characteristics and to the delayed-enhancement technique (DE-MRI), MRI has recently emerged as the only noninvasive modality able to provide a three-dimensional (3D) evaluation of cardiac viability with a multiparametric approach.     

The cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) approach to assessing myocardial viability

Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) is a noninvasive imaging method that can determine myocardial anatomy, function, perfusion, and viability in a relative short examination. In terms of viability assessment, CMR can determine viability in a non-contrast enhanced scan using dobutamine stress following protocols comparable to those developed for dobutamine echocardiography. CMR can also determine viability with late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) methods. The gadolinium-based contrast agents used for LGE differentiate viable myocardium from scar on the basis of differences in cell membrane integrity for acute myocardial infarction. In chronic myocardial infarction, the scarred tissue enhances much more than normal myocardium due to increases in extracellular volume. LGE is well validated in pre-clinical and clinical studies that now span from almost a cellular level in animals to human validations in a large international multicenter clinical trial. Beyond infarct size or infarct detection, LGE is a strong predictor of mortality and adverse cardiac events. CMR can also image microvascular obstruction and intracardiac thrombus. When combined with a measure of area at risk like T2-weighted images, CMR can determine infarct size, area at risk, and thus estimate myocardial salvage 1-7 days after acute myocardial infarction. Thus, CMR is a well validated technique that can assess viability by gadolinium-free dobutamine stress testing or late gadolinium enhancement.     

Optimized cardiac magnetic resonance imaging inversion recovery sequence for metal artifact reduction and accurate myocardial scar assessment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices

Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the gold standard for imaging myocardial viability. An important application of LGE CMR is the assessment of the location and extent of the myocardial scar in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT), which allows for more accurate identification of the ablation targets. However, a large percentage of patients with VT have cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), which is a relative contraindication for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging due to safety and image artifact concerns. Previous studies showed that these patients can be safely scanned on 1.5 T scanners provided that an adequate imaging protocol is adopted. Nevertheless, imaging patients with a CIED result in metal artifacts due to the strong frequency off-resonance effects near the device; therefore, the spins in the surrounding myocardium are not completely inverted, and thus give rise to hyperintensity artifacts. These artifacts obscure the myocardial scar tissue and limit the ability to study the correlation between the myocardial scar structure and the electro-anatomical map during catheter ablation. In this study, we developed a modified inversion recovery technique to alleviate the CIED-induced metal artifacts and improve the diagnostic image quality of LGE images in patients with CIEDs without increasing scan time or requiring additional hardware. The developed technique was tested in phantom experiments and in vivo scans, which showed its capability for suppressing the hyperintensity artifacts without compromising myocardium nulling in the resulting LGE images.     

探测心肌活力的技术进展

心肌活力的评估十分重要,它有助于了解心肌病变患者的预后和选择治疗方式。评估心肌活力的方法包括核医学和其他临床上常见的方法,其中核医学上的方法有18F-FDG PET、18F-FDG SPECT、201Tl SPECT、99Tcm-MIBI SPECT和脂肪酸显像,其他显像技术包括多巴酚丁胺负荷超声,MRI(核磁共振显像)等。     

心肌活力测定的研究进展

心肌灌注显像的定量分析、门控心肌灌注显像、18F-氟代脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)+99Tcm甲氧基异丁基异腈(99Tcm-MIBI)双核素同时采集(DISA)、介入心动图和核磁共振显像(MRI)技术的进展提高了对心肌活力的认识,介入心动图、心肌灌注显像、心肌代谢显像的结合应用提高了心肌活力测定的准确性。心肌活力测定可确定能得益于冠状动脉再血管化治疗的患者,并可预测术后左室射血分数的增加和心力衰竭症状的改善。     

Assessment of myocardial viability in patients with heart failure.

The prognosis for patients with chronic ischemic left ventricular dysfunction is poor, despite advances in different therapies. Noninvasive assessment of myocardial viability may guide patient management. Multiple imaging techniques have been developed to assess viable and nonviable myocardium by evaluating perfusion, cell membrane integrity, mitochondria, glucose metabolism, scar tissue, and contractile reserve. PET, (201)Tl and (99m)Tc scintigraphy, and dobutamine stress echocardiography have been extensively evaluated for assessment of viability and prediction of clinical outcome after coronary revascularization. In general, nuclear imaging techniques have a high sensitivity for the detection of viability, whereas techniques evaluating contractile reserve have a somewhat lower sensitivity and a higher specificity. MRI has a high diagnostic accuracy for assessment of the transmural extent of myocardial scar tissue. Patients with a substantial amount of dysfunctional but viable myocardium are likely to benefit from coronary revascularization and may show improvements in regional and global contractile function, symptoms, exercise capacity, and long-term prognosis.     

MRI of left ventricular function

Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is widely recognized as the most accurate noninvasive imaging modality for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) function. By use of state-of-the-art magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanners, electrocardiography (ECG)-gated cine images depicting LV function with high contrast and excellent spatial and temporal resolution are readily acquired in breath-holds of 5 to 10 heartbeats. For patients in whom breath-holding and ECG gating are difficult, real-time cine imaging without ECG gating and breath-holding can be performed. LV function can be qualitatively assessed from cine images, or alternatively, parameters such as LV volumes, ejection fraction, and mass may be quantified via computer-based analysis software. In addition, techniques such as myocardial tagging and newer variants can be used to qualitatively or quantitatively assess regional intramyocardial strain, twist, and torsion. Many of the CMR methods have undergone clinical evaluation in the settings of high-dose dobutamine stress testing and determination of myocardial viability. These methods are also very accurate for prognosis in coronary heart disease patients and may be quite useful for the detection of contractile dyssynchrony. When used together with other CMR techniques such as first-pass perfusion imaging or late gadolinium enhancement, CMR of LV function provides a wealth of information in a single imaging study.     

PET和SPECT结合延迟增强MRI评价存活心肌的进展

冠状动脉硬化性心脏病可造成不同程度的心肌损害,而只有存活心肌经血运重建后心功能得到改善,患者才能从中获益。因此,选择一种有效、准确的评价存活心肌的方法对选择治疗方案,决定是否进行血运重建治疗具有重要的临床指导意义。PET和SPECT是评价心肌存活的常用方法,近年来,随着MRI技术的迅速发展,临床应用也不断扩展,特别是心肌灌注延迟增强扫描显像的应用可从坏死组织中区分周围的存活心肌。     

Assessment of myocardial viability

The prevalence of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and resultant congestive heart failure is increasing. Patients with this condition are at high risk for cardiac death and usually have significant limitations in their lifestyles. Although there have been advances in medical therapy resulting in improved survival and well being, the best and most definitive therapy, when appropriate, is revascularization. In the setting of coronary artery disease, accounting for approximately two thirds of cases of congestive heart failure, LV dysfunction often is not the result of irreversible scar but rather caused by impairment in function and energy use of still viable-myocytes, with the opportunity for improved function if coronary blood flow is restored. Patients with LV dysfunction who have viable myocardium are the patients at highest risk because of the potential for ischemia but at the same time benefit most from revascularization. It is important to identify viable myocardium in these patients, and radionuclide myocardial scintigraphy is an excellent tool for this. Single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion scintigraphy, whether using thallium-201, Tc-99m sestamibi, or Tc-99m tetrofosmin, in stress and/or rest protocols, has consistently been shown to be an effective modality for identifying myocardial viability and guiding appropriate management. Metabolic imaging with positron emission tomography radiotracers frequently adds additional information and is a powerful tool for predicting which patients will have an improved outcome from revascularization, including some patients referred instead for cardiac transplantation. Other noninvasive modalities, such as stress echocardiography, also facilitate the assessment of myocardial viability, but there are advantages and disadvantages compared with the nuclear techniques. Nuclear imaging appears to require fewer viable cells for detection, resulting in a higher sensitivity but a lower specificity than stress echocardiography for predicting post-revascularization improvement of ventricular function. Nevertheless, it appears that LV functional improvement may not always be necessary for clinical improvement. Future directions include use of magnetic resonance imaging, as well as larger, multicenter trials of radionuclide techniques. The increasing population of patients with LV dysfunction, and the increased benefit afforded by newer therapies, will make assessment of myocardial viability even more essential for proper patient management.     

Detection and characterization of hibernating myocardium

Since Tennant and Wiggers observed that coronary occlusion caused a reduction in cardiac contractile function, a lot has been written about the concept of hibernating myocardium. Known as the 'smart heart', hibernating myocardium is characterized by a persistent ventricular myocardial dysfunction with preserved viability, which improves with the relief of the ischaemia; this chronic downregulation in contractile function being a protective mechanism to reduce oxygen demand and thus ensure myocyte survival. This improvement usually results in an enrichment in the quality of life as well as enhanced ventricular function. In fact, it has been observed that the cardiac event rate in patients with viable dysfunctional left ventricular segments who are medically treated, is higher than the event rate in patients with comparable viability who are revascularized. Different degrees of histological alteration have been seen in hibernating myocardium, ranging from cellular de-differentiation (fetal phenotype) to cellular degeneration. Cellular de-differentiation has been associated with repetitive stunning. On the other hand, cellular degeneration (with more extensive fibrosis) has been associated with chronic low myocardial blood flow and a longer time to recovery after revascularization. These histological patterns may suggest an evolution from cellular de-differentiation to degeneration, which ends in scar formation if no revascularization is performed. In fact, several studies have described the clinical value of identifying and revascularizing hibernating segments as early as possible, to minimize fibrosis and morbidity from adverse events. Detection of hibernating myocardium still remains an important clinical problem. Imaging modalities to assess myocardial viability must differentiate potentially functional tissue from myocardium with no potential for functional recovery. These techniques fall into three broad categories: ventricular function assessment, myocardial perfusion imaging and myocardial metabolic imaging. PET imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and 11C-acetate, single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) with thallium and 99mTc-sestamibi, dobutamine echocardiograpy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and fast computed tomography (CT) have been used for this purpose. PET imaging, in both perfusion and glucose metabolic activity, has become a standard for myocardial viability assessment, however, similar information may be available from carefully performed studies with perfusion tracers alone.     

Assessment of myocardial viability with two-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging

In a patient with coronary artery disease, clinical, electrocardiographic, and angiographic information is often inadequate for determining the presence of viable tissue. The presence of wall thickening, even if reduced, indicates that the myocardium is viable. When wall thickening is absent, the myocardium may or may not be viable. The basis for the underlying myocardial dysfunction may be multifactorial in a single patient or even in a single myocardial segment. Cardiac imaging techniques are most useful in defining the mechanisms of underlying myocardial dysfunction and assist in selecting the optimal management strategy for patients. This review discusses the role of two-dimensional echocardiography and magnetic resonance imaging for the assesment of myocardial viability.     

Contrast-enhanced MRI for quantification of myocardial viability.

During the past 10 years substantial advances have taken place in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) capabilities and in contrast media development. Furthermore, knowledge of in vivo contrast media interactions with surrounding water and distribution into tissue has increased, permitting regional quantification of concentration-time profiles in the myocardium. The combination of these advances has substantially improved the capability of contrast-enhanced MRI characterization of myocardial ischemic injury, including its ability to discriminate viable from nonviable zones. Discrimination of viable from nonviable myocardial subregions is important for patient management and for research applications. This review addresses recent progress toward the goal of defining viable and nonviable myocardium based on MRI detection of contrast media effects. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 1999;10:694-702.     

3-Tesla-Magnetresonanztomographie zur Untersuchung von Kindern und Erwachsenen mit angeborenen Herzfehlern

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) has become a routinely used imaging modality for congenital heart disease. A CMR examination allows the assessment of thoracic anatomy, global and regional cardiac function, blood flow in the great vessels and myocardial viability and perfusion. In the clinical routine cardiovascular MRI is mostly performed at field strengths of 1.5 Tesla (T). Recently, magnetic resonance systems operating at a field strengths of 3 T became clinically available and can also be used for cardiovascular MRI. The main advantage of CMR at 3 T is the gain in the signal-to-noise ratio resulting in improved image quality and/or allowing higher acquisition speed. Several further differences compared to MRI systems with lower field strengths have to be considered for practical applications. This article describes the impact of CMR at 3 T in patients with congenital heart disease by meanings of methodical considerations and case studies.     

Diagnosis of coronary artery disease with dobutamine-stress MRI

Dobutamine-stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a new diagnostic tool for the non-invasive detection of coronary artery disease. Technological advances in CMR have evolved this technique to an adequate alternative to the standard cardiac stress tests. Its high reproducibility and excellent image quality of the anatomical features of the left ventricle and left ventricular function at rest and during stress make it an ideal technique for the comprehensive evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Besides its ability to detect myocardial ischemia, CMR has proved to be diagnostic for myocardial viability as well. A recent technical refinement in CMR using myocardial tagging has improved the diagnostic accuracy for myocardial ischemia even further. Dobutamine-stress CMR is used to identify wall motion abnormalities of the left ventricle in patients with proven or suspected coronary artery disease [1-4]. Dobutamine-stress CMR has emerged as a highly accurate and safe diagnostic modality [1-4]. Recently, the use of high-dose dobutamine CMR in combination with the myocardial tagging technique has been reported, with excellent diagnostic results. The use of this new technique and the clinical applications are discussed.     

Free‐breathing high‐spatial‐resolution delayed contrast‐enhanced three‐dimensional viability MR imaging of the myocardium at 3.0T: A feasibility study

Purpose

To assess the feasibility of free‐breathing high‐spatial‐resolution delayed contrast‐enhanced three‐dimensional (3D) viability magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 3.0T for the detection of myocardial damages.

Materials and Methods

Twenty‐five patients with myocardial diseases, including myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathies, were enrolled after informed consent was given. Free‐breathing 3D viability MRI with high spatial resolution (1.5 × 1.25 × 2.5 mm) at 3.0T, for which cardiac and navigator gating techniques were employed, was compared with breath‐hold two‐dimensional (2D) viability imaging (1.77 × 1.18 × 10 mm) for assessment of contrast‐to‐noise ratio (CNR) and myocardial damage.

Results

Free‐breathing 3D viability imaging was achieved successfully in 21 of the 25 patients. This imaging technique depicted 84.6% of hyperenhancing myocardium with a higher CNR between hyperenhancing myocardium and blood and with excellent agreement for the transmural extension of myocardial damage (k = 0.91). In particular, the 3D viability images delineated the myocardial infarction and linear hyperenhancing myocardium, comparable to the 2D viability images.

Conclusion

Free‐breathing high‐spatial‐resolution delayed contrast‐enhanced 3D viability MRI using 3.0T was feasible for the evaluation of hyperenhancing myocardium, as seen with myocardial infarction and cardiomyopathies. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008;28:1361–1367. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Delayed hyperenhancement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical application for various cardiac diseases

The clinical applications of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) imaging for defining viability are evolving as a result of the advantage of the technique's excellent spatial resolution. The value of delayed hyperenhancement imaging is for the accurate identification of the infarcted myocardium with resolution that allows determination of the transmural extent of myocardial injury. In addition, nonischemic patterns of myocardial injury such as dilated or hypertrophic cardiomyopathy have been reported in other disease states. Delayed hyperenhancement may have an additional role in guiding the management of or determining the prognosis for diseases such as myocarditis. In this study, the clinical application of delayed hyperenhancement is demonstrated for various cardiac diseases such as myocardial infarction, including right ventricular infarction; microvascular obstruction; and nonischemic cardiomyopathy such as dilated cardiomyopathy and myocarditis.     

心脏MR延迟强化在急性心肌梗死的应用及研究现状

急性心肌梗死（AMI）梗死心肌、心肌活性和微血管梗阻（MVO）的定量评价对于AMI病人的危险程度分级、治疗决策的制定、治疗效果的评价以及预后评估具有重要意义。心脏MR延迟强化（LGE-CMR）具有较高的时间及空间分辨力,可用于AMI梗死心肌、心肌活性和MVO的定量评价,并且具有较好的可重复性和较高的准确性。就LGE-CMR在AMI的应用及研究现状进行综述。     

Quantification of cardiac function by conventional and cine magnetic resonance imaging

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has been effective for depicting cardiac anatomy and is already established as a technique for the evaluation of some structural abnormalities of the heart and pericardium. With recent advances, MRI can now be used to quantitate cardiac function. Multiphasic ECG-gated spin-echo imaging has been used to quantitate right and left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction. left ventricular mass, and regional myocardial wall thickening. The new technique of cine MRI acquires frames during the cardiac cycle with a time resolution corresponding to 20 msec up to approximately 40 frames for an average cardiac cycle. This technique uses narrow flip angle (30°) and gradient refocused echoes. Cine MRI has been used to measure ventricular volumes and ejection fraction and regional myocardial wall thickening. It is also sensitive to the detection of valvular regurgitation and can provide quantitation of regurgitant volume. This article reviews the current status of MRI for quantitating cardiac function. Research fellow in magnetic resonance imaging supported by grant SE 441-2 from Deutsche Forschungsgenmeinschaft, Bonn, West Germany. Research fellow in magnetic resonance imaging supported by a grant from the Canadian Heart Foundation.