The relative activity of CXCR3 and CCR5 ligands in T lymphocyte migration: concordant and disparate activities in vitro and in vivo

In chronic inflammatory reactions such as rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis, T cells in the inflamed tissue express the chemokine receptors CXCR3 and CCR5, and the chemokine ligands (CCL) of these receptors are present in the inflammatory lesions. However, the contribution of these chemokines to T cell recruitment to sites of inflammation is unclear. In addition, the relative roles of the chemokines that bind CXCR3 (CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11) and CCR5 (CCL3, CCL4, CCL5) in this process are unknown. The in vitro chemotaxis and in vivo migration of antigen-activated T lymphoblasts and unactivated spleen T cells to chemokines were examined. T lymphoblasts migrated in vitro to CXCR3 ligands with a relative potency of CXCL10 > CXCL11 > CXCL9, but these cells demonstrated much less chemotaxis to the CCR5 ligands. In vivo, T lymphocytes were recruited in large numbers with rapid kinetics to skin sites injected with CXCL10 and CCL5 and less to CCL3, CCL4, CXCL9, and CXCL11. The combination of CCL5 with CXCL10 but not the other chemokines markedly increased recruitment. Coinjection of interferon-gamma, tumor necrosis factor alpha, and interleukin-1alpha to up-regulate endothelial cell adhesion molecule expression with CXCL10 or CCL5 induced an additive increase in lymphoblast migration. Thus, CXCR3 ligands are more chemotactic than CCR5 ligands in vitro; however, in vivo, CXCL10 and CCL5 have comparable T cell-recruiting activities to cutaneous sites and are more potent than the other CXCR3 and CCR5 chemokines. Therefore, in vitro chemotaxis induced by these chemokines is not necessarily predictive of their in vivo lymphocyte-recruiting activity.     

Expression and functional activity of chemokine receptors in glatiramer acetate-specific T cells isolated from multiple sclerosis patient receiving the drug glatiramer acetate

The purpose of the current study is to examine the surface expression of chemokine receptors and the chemotaxis toward the respective chemokines of glatiramer acetate (GA)-specific CD4(+) T cells isolated from the blood and the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of a multiple sclerosis (MS) patient. Four clones were selected, two isolated from the peripheral blood and two from the CSF. CCR4 and CXCR3 were expressed on all four clones. Both blood-derived clones also expressed CCR5 and, to a lesser extent, CCR6. Similarly, one CSF clone expressed CCR5 and CCR6. In contrast, CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR7, CCR9, CCR10, CXCR1, CXCR4, CXCR5, CXCR6, and CCR6 were either expressed on few cells or were not expressed at all on all four clones examined. The expression of chemokine receptors was corroborated with the ability of the cells to respond chemotactically to the corresponding chemokines, CCL5/RANTES, CCL20/MIP-3α, CCL22/MDC and CXCL10/IP-10. Both the receptor expression and chemotaxis were reduced upon activation with PMA and ionomycin. The shared expression of chemokine receptors and the migration patterns suggest that GA-reactive cells have migrated from the blood into the CSF, and that local reactivation within the inflamed CSF may downregulate the expression of chemokine receptors and hence impede their migration intrathecally. The results may also explain the beneficial synergistic effects of combining immunosuppressive drugs with GA in MS patients.     

I-TAC/CXCL11 is a natural antagonist for CCR5

The selective CXC chemokine receptor 3 (CXCR3) agonists, monokine induced by interferon-gamma (IFN- gamma)/CXC chemokine ligand 9 (CXCL9), IFN-inducible protein 10/CXCL10, and IFN-inducible T cell alpha chemoattractant (I-TAC)/CXCL11, attract CXCR3+ cells such as CD45RO+ T lymphocytes, B cells, and natural killer cells. Further, all three chemokines are potent, natural antagonists for chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3) and feature defensin-like, antimicrobial activities. In this study, we show that I-TAC, in addition to these effects, acts as an antagonist for CCR5. I-TAC inhibited the binding of macrophage-inflammatory protein-1alpha (MIP-1alpha)/CC chemokine ligand 3 (CCL3) to cells transfected with CCR5 and to monocytes. Furthermore, cell migration evoked by regulated on activation, normal T expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5 and MIP-1beta/CCL4, the selective agonist of CCR5, was inhibited in transfected cells and monocytes, respectively. In two other functional assays, namely the release of free intracellular calcium and actin polymerization, I-TAC reduced CCR5 activities to minimal levels. Sequence and structure analyses indicate a potential role for K17, K49, and Q51 of I-TAC in CCR5 binding. Our results expand on the potential role of I-TAC as a negative modulator in leukocyte migration and activation, as I-TAC would specifically counteract the responses mediated by many "classical," inflammatory chemokines that act not only via CCR3 but via CCR5 as well.     

CCR3 functional responses are regulated by both CXCR3 and its ligands CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11

The chemokine receptor CXCR3 is predominantly expressed on T lymphocytes, and its agonists CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 are IFN-gamma-inducible chemokines that promote Th1 responses. In contrast, the CCR3 agonists CCL11, CCL24 and CCL26 are involved in the recruitment of cells such as eosinophils and basophils during Th2 responses. Here, we report that although CCL11, CCL24 and CCL26 are neither agonists nor antagonists of CXCR3, CCL11 binds with high affinity to CXCR3. This suggests that, in vivo, CXCR3 may act as a decoy receptor, sequestering locally produced CCL11. We also demonstrate that the CXCR3 ligands inhibit CCR3-mediated functional responses of both human eosinophils and CCR3 transfectants induced by all three eotaxins, with CXCL11 being the most efficacious antagonist. The examination of CCR3-CCR1 chimeric constructs revealed that CCL11 and CXCL11 share overlapping binding sites contained within the CCR3 extracellular loops, a region that was previously shown to be essential for effective receptor-activation. Hence, eosinophil responses mediated by chemokines acting at CCR3 may be regulated by two distinct mechanisms: the antagonistic effects of CXCR3 ligands and the sequestration of CCL11 by CXCR3-expressing cells. Such interplay may serve to finely tune inflammatory responses in vivo.     

Chemokines and other GPCR ligands synergize in receptor-mediated migration of monocyte-derived immature and mature dendritic cells

Dendritic cells (DCs) are potent antigen presenting cells, described as the initiators of adaptive immune responses. Immature monocyte-derived DCs (MDDC) showed decreased CD14 expression, increased cell surface markers DC-SIGN and CD1a and enhanced levels of receptors for the chemokines CCL3 (CCR1/CCR5) and CXCL8 (CXCR1/CXCR2) compared with human CD14⁺ monocytes. After further MDDC maturation by LPS, the markers CD80 and CD83 and the chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR7 were upregulated, whereas CCR1, CCR2 and CCR5 expression was reduced. CCL3 dose-dependently synergized with CXCL8 or CXCL12 in chemotaxis of immature MDDC. CXCL12 augmented the CCL3-induced ERK1/2 and Akt phosphorylation in immature MDDC, although the synergy between CCL3 and CXCL12 in chemotaxis of immature MDDC was dependent on the Akt signaling pathway but not on ERK1/2 phosphorylation. CCL2 also synergized with CXCL12 in immature MDDC migration. Moreover, two CXC chemokines not sharing receptors (CXCL12 and CXCL8) cooperated in immature MDDC chemotaxis, whereas two CC chemokines (CCL3 and CCL7) sharing CCR1 did not. Further, the non-chemokine G protein-coupled receptor ligands chemerin and fMLP synergized with respectively CCL7 and CCL3 in immature MDDC signaling and migration. Finally, CXCL12 and CCL3 did not cooperate, but CXCL12 synergized with CCL21 in mature MDDC chemotaxis. Thus, chemokine synergy in immature and mature MDDC migration is dose-dependently regulated by chemokines via alterations in their chemokine receptor expression pattern according to their role in immune responses.     

Infiltrating CD8+ T cells in oral lichen planus predominantly express CCR5 and CXCR3 and carry respective chemokine ligands RANTES/CCL5 and IP-10/CXCL10 in their cytolytic granules: a potential self-recruiting mechanism

Lichen planus is a chronic inflammatory disease of the skin and oral mucosa in which the cell-mediated cytotoxicity is regarded as a major mechanism of pathogenesis. To understand its pathophysiology further, the present study examined the in situ expression of chemokines and chemokine receptors in oral lichen planus. Immunohistochemical analysis of 15 cases has consistently revealed that infiltrating CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells in the submucosa predominantly expressed CCR5 and CXCR3. Furthermore, infiltrating T cells, particularly CD8(+) T cells, were positive for RANTES/CCL5 and IP-10/CXCL10, the ligands of CCR5 and CXCR3, respectively. By immunoelectron microscopy, these chemokines were localized in the cytolytic granules of CD8(+) T cells. Lesional keratinocytes also overexpressed the ligands of CXCR3, namely, MIG/CXCL9, CXCL10, and I-TAC/CXCL11. Our data suggest that the chemokines signaling via CCR5 and CXCR3, which are known to be selectively expressed by type 1 T cells, are predominantly involved in T-cell infiltration of oral lichen planus. Furthermore, the presence of CCL5 and CXCL10 in the cytolytic granules of tissue-infiltrating CD8(+) T cells expressing CCR5 and CXCR3 reveals a potential self-recruiting mechanism involving activated effector cytotoxic T cells.     

CXCR4 and CCR5 ligands cooperate in monocyte and lymphocyte migration and in inhibition of dual-tropic (R5/X4) HIV-1 infection

One of the most important functions of chemokines and their receptors is the regulation of directional migration of leukocytes within tissues. In specific tissue compartments, cells are exposed to multiple chemokines presented in complex dimensional and temporal patterns. Therefore, a leukocyte requires the mechanisms to integrate the various directional signals it receives from different chemoattractants. In this study, we report that CCL3, CCL5, and CCL8, three potent mononuclear cell chemoattractants, are able to synergize with the homeostatic chemokine CXCL12 in the migration of CD14(+) monocytes, CD3(+) T-lymphocytes, or PHA-activated lymphoblasts. In addition, CCL5 augmented the CXCR4 ligand-driven ERK phosphorylation in mononuclear cells. Furthermore, the synergistic effect between CCL5 and CXCL12 in monocyte chemotaxis is inhibited in the presence of specific CCR1 antibody and AMD3100, but not by maraviroc. In HIV-1 infection assays, a combination of CXCL12 and CCL5 cooperated to inhibit the replication of the dual-tropic (R5/X4) HIV-1 HE strain. Finally, although the dual-tropic HIV-1 strain was barely suppressed by AMD3100 or maraviroc alone, HIV-1 infection was completely blocked by the combination of these two receptor antagonists. Our data demonstrate the cooperation between CCL5 and CXCL12, which has implications in migration of monocytes/lymphocytes during inflammation and in HIV-1 infection.     

CCR8-dependent activation of the RAS/MAPK pathway mediates anti-apoptotic activity of I-309/ CCL1 and vMIP-I

We have previously shown that the CC-chemokine 1-309 (CCL1) protects mouse thymic lymphomas against corticoid-induced apoptosis. Here, we analyzed the signal transduction pathways involved in this activity on BW5147 lymphoma. Inhibition of the CCL1 activity by pertussis toxin suggested the involvement of a G protein-coupled chemokine receptor. The role of CCR8 was supported by the observation that vMIP-I, another CCR8-ligand identified from the genome of a T cell transforming herpes virus, shared CCL1 anti-apoptotic activity. In addition to CCR8, BW5147 cells also expressed the CXCR4 receptor but its ligand, SDF-1 (CXCL12) showed only a modest anti-apoptotic activity. Other chemokines acting on CCR2, CCR4 and CCR5 failed to protect against apoptosis and to induce BW5147 chemotaxis, suggesting that these receptors were not functionally expressed. By contrast, both CCL1 and vMIP-I up-regulated ERK1/2 MAPK phosphorylation in BW5147 cells. Further analysis demonstrated that CCL1 activates the MAPK pathway in CCR8-transfected CHO cells. The implication of this pathway was confirmed by the fact that PD98059, an inhibitor of MEK kinases, as well as a dominant negative isoform of the M-RAS protein specifically blocked the anti-apoptotic activity of CCL1.     

Neutrophils produce biologically active macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha (MIP-3alpha)/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19.

Macrophage inflammatory protein-3alpha (MIP-3alpha)/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19 are members of the CC chemokine subfamily which exert their effects through specific receptors, CCR6 and CCR7, respectively. Previously, we have reported that human neutrophils have the capacity to produce a number of chemokines, including IL-8/CXCL8, GROalpha/CXCL1, IP-10/CXCL10, and MIG/CXCL9. Herein, we show that neutrophils also have the ability to express and release MIP-3alpha/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19 when cultured with either LPS or TNF-alpha. We also report that MIP-3alpha/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19 production by LPS-stimulated neutrophils is negatively modulated by IL-10. Remarkably, we found that supernatants harvested from stimulated neutrophils not only induced chemotaxis of both immature and mature dendritic cells (DC), but also triggered rapid integrin-dependent adhesion of CCR6- and CCR7-expressing lymphocytes to purified VCAM-1 and ICAM-1, respectively. Importantly, both chemotaxis and rapid integrin-dependent adhesion were dramatically suppressed by anti-MIP-3alpha/CCL20 and anti-MIP-3beta/CCL19 neutralizing antibodies, indicating that MIP-3alpha/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19 present in the supernatants were both biologically active. As these chemokines are primarily chemotactic for DC and specific lymphocyte subsets, the ability of neutrophils to produce MIP-3alpha/CCL20 and MIP-3beta/CCL19 might be significant in orchestrating the recruitment of these cell types to the inflamed sites and therefore in contributing to the regulation of the immune response.     

Th22 cells are efficiently recruited in the gut by CCL28 as an alternative to CCL20 but do not compensate for the loss of Th17 cells in treated HIV-1-infected individuals

Gut CD4⁺ T cells are incompletely restored in most HIV-1-infected individuals on antiretroviral therapy, notably Th17 cells, a key subset in mucosal homeostasis. By contrast, gut Th22 cells are usually restored at normal frequencies. Th22 cells display a CCR6⁺CCR10⁺ phenotype and could thus respond to CCL20- and CCL28-mediated chemotaxis, while Th17 cells, which express CCR6 but not CCR10, depend on CCL20. Herein, we found that CCL28 is normally expressed by duodenal enterocytes of treated HIV-1-infected individuals, while CCL20 expression is blunted. Ex vivo, we showed that Th22 cells contribute to the reduction of CCL20 production by enterocytes through an IL-22- and IL-18-dependent mechanism. Th22 cells preferentially migrate via CCL20- rather than CCL28-mediated chemotaxis when both chemokines are available in the microenvironment. However, when the CCL20/CCL28 ratio drops, as in treated HIV-1-infected individuals, Th22 cells can migrate via the CCR10–CCL28 axis, as an alternative to CCR6–CCL20. This could explain the better reconstitution of gut Th22 compared with Th17 cells on antiretroviral therapy. Lastly, we assessed the relationships between the frequencies of gut Th17 and Th22 cells and inflammatory markers related to microbial translocation, and showed that Th22 cells do not compensate for the loss of Th17 cells in treated HIV-1-infected individuals.     

Systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor responses are divergent in allergic versus non-allergic humans

T(h)1- and T(h)2-polarized human T cell clones display distinct patterns of chemokine receptor expression and selective chemokine responsiveness in vitro. We hypothesized that natural exposure to environmental grass pollen would induce differential systemic chemokine and chemokine receptor expression patterns in individuals with allergic rhinitis compared to healthy controls with type 2- and type 1-dominated responses to allergen respectively. To this end, we compared chemokine receptor expression on peripheral blood T cells directly ex vivo and plasma chemokine levels between these two groups of study participants prior to and during the grass pollen season. T(h)1-associated CXC chemokine receptor (CXCR) 3 was strongly expressed on >50% CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells of all subjects. When examined longitudinally, CXCR3 expression increased over the grass pollen season (P < 0.0001), solely in non-allergic subjects. In contrast, for both allergic and non-allergic subjects, CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 5 (T(h)1-associated) and CCR3 (T(h)2-associated) were weakly expressed on <10% of CD4(+)/CD45RO(+) cells both prior to and during the grass pollen season. Type 1 chemokines CXC chemokine ligand (CXCL) 9 and CXCL10 (monokine induced by IFN-gamma and IFN-gamma-inducible protein of 10 kDa: CXCR3 ligands), and type 2 chemokines CC chemokine ligand (CCL) 11 (eotaxin: CCR3 ligand), CCL17 (thymus and activation-regulated chemokine: CCR4 ligand) and CCL22 (monocyte-derived chemokine: CCR4 ligand) were readily detectable in the plasma of most participants. Systemic CXCL9 levels decreased from pre- to grass pollen season in allergics (P < 0.05), whereas CCL17 decreased in non-allergics (P < 0.05) over the same period. Taken together, these longitudinal data suggest a systemic shift to more intensely type 1-dominated responses in non-allergic individuals and, conversely, to more type 2-dominated responses in allergic individuals upon natural re-exposure to grass pollen.     

Combination therapy: Synergistic suppression of virus-induced chemokines in airway epithelial cells

Viruses are associated with the majority of exacerbations of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Virus induction of neutrophil and lymphocyte chemokines in bronchial epithelium is important in exacerbation pathogenesis. Combined corticosteroid/beta2 agonists synergistically suppress airway smooth muscle chemokine production. Because bronchial epithelium expresses glucocorticoid and beta2 receptors, we investigated whether combination therapy can synergistically suppress rhinovirus-induced bronchial epithelial cell neutrophil (CXCL5, CXCL8) and lymphocyte (CCL5, CXCL10) chemokine production. We investigated modulation of rhinovirus- and IL-1beta-induced bronchial epithelial cell chemokine production by salmeterol and fluticasone propionate, used at therapeutic concentrations, alone and in combination. After 1 h pretreatment, combined treatment significantly inhibited rhinovirus 16, 1B, and IL-1beta-induced CCL5 and CXCL8 protein and mRNA production in BEAS-2B cells compared with fluticasone alone. When used 4 h after treatment, the combination significantly reduced virus-induced CCL5 but not CXCL8. Salmeterol alone had no effect; therefore, this inhibition was synergistic. Kinetic analysis demonstrated that combination therapy reduced by 5-fold the concentration of corticosteroid required to inhibit CXCL8 mRNA expression. In primary cells, salmeterol alone reduced rhinovirus-induced CCL5 and CXCL10 and increased CXCL5 production in a dose-dependent manner but had no effect on CXCL8. Fluticasone alone reduced CCL5, CXCL8, and CXCL10 but had no effect on CXCL5. Combination therapy augmented inhibition of CXCL8, CCL5, and CXCL10 but had no effect on CXCL5. Corticosteroids and beta2 agonists suppress rhinovirus-induced chemokines in bronchial epithelial cells through synergistic and additive mechanisms. This effect was greater for lymphocyte- than for neutrophil-related chemokines.     

Antichemokine immunotherapy for allergic diseases

Chemokines have emerged as critical regulators of leukocyte function and as such represent attractive new targets for the therapy of allergic diseases. Recent studies have revealed important roles for the chemokine family in both the afferent and efferent limbs of the immune system, orchestrating and integrating innate and acquired immune responses. A subset of chemokines including eotaxin-1 (also called CCL11), eotaxin-2 (CCL24), eotaxin-3 (CCL26), MCP (monocyte chemoattractant protein)-3 (CCL7), MCP (monocyte chemoattractant protein)-4 (CCL13), TARC (thymus- and activation-regulated chemokine) (CCL17), and MDC (macrophage-derived chemokine) (CCL22) are highly expressed in allergic inflammation and are regulated by T helper type 2 cytokines. Receptors for these chemokines, including CCR3 (CC chemokine receptor 3), CCR4 (CC chemokine receptor 4) and CCR8 (CC chemokine receptor 8) are expressed on key leukocytes associated with allergic inflammation, such as T helper type 2 cells, eosinophils, mast cells and basophils, establishing a subset of chemokine/chemokine receptors potentially important in allergic inflammation. Recent data using inhibitory antibodies and chemokine antagonists support the concept that interfering with this subset of chemokines and their receptors represents a new approach to allergy immunotherapy.     

The chemokines CCL5, CCL2 and CXCL12 play significant roles in the migration of Th1 cells into rheumatoid synovial tissue

As the T-cell population in the synovial tissue (ST) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is dominated by T helper (Th) 1 cells, this study was designed to examine whether there is a preferential migration of polarized T cells to ST, and to identify the chemokines responsible for the migration. This was done by developing 10 T-cell clones specific for an arbitrary antigen (mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG)) from the peripheral blood (PB) of a healthy donor sensitized to mouse IgG. The Th polarizations of the clones were determined by measuring secreted interferon-gamma and interleukin-4, following anti-CD3 stimulation. Migration to pools of RA ST cell-derived supernatants was analysed. Expression of the chemokine receptors CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR6, CCR7, CCR8, CXCR3 and CXCR4 were analysed by flow cytometry. Th1 clones showed significantly higher migration to RA ST cell-derived supernatant compared with Th2 clones. Blocking of either of the chemokines, CCL5 or CCL2, strongly inhibited migration of the Th1 cells between 56 and 77%, while blocking of CXCL12 inhibited migration between 44 and 61%. Blocking of CXCL10 had only a minor inhibitory effect. Our results demonstrate a selective migration of Th1 cells to RA ST supernatant and that blocking either CCL5, CCL2 or CXCL12 significantly inhibits T-cell migration. This indicates that CCL5, CCL2 and CXCL12 play significant roles in attracting Th1 cells towards the RA ST, and may prove potent targets for obstructing T-cell migration to the synovium.     

Cutaneous lymphoma and chemokine

The expression pattern of chemokines and chemokine receptors is specific to certain organs and cells. Therefore, chemokines are important to elucidate the mechanism of organ-specific human diseases such as cutaneous lymphoma, characterized by proliferation of clonally expanded lymphocytes in skin without detectable systemic involvement. The most popular type of cutaneous lymphoma is T cell lymphoma, including mycosis fungoides and Sezary syndrome. We have reported that CCL17, CCL27, CCL11, and CCL26 are involved in progression of these diseases. The above chemokines are highly expressed in the lesional skin and serum levels of the chemokines are elevated as the disease progressed. Moreover, CXCL9 and CXCL10 are associated with epidermotropism of tumor cells, CCL21 is important for tumor invasion to lymph nodes, and CXCL12 may explain downregulation of CD26 on the cell surface. CXCL13 expression in lymphoid follicular formation in skin and CCR3 expression on tumor cells in CD30(+) lymphoproliferative disorders are also discussed. Biologics targeting chemokines and their receptors are promising strategies for cutaneous lymphoma. Indeed, humanized anti-CCR4 monoclonal antibody showed potent antitumor activity against CCR4(+) lymphoma cells both in vitro and ex vivo. This antibody may also be useful for allergic diseases such as hay fever. Further study on chemokines and chemokine receptors will be helpful for new classification of cutaneous lymphoma, elucidation of pathogenesis, and development of new therapeutic strategies.     

Serum amyloid A chemoattracts immature dendritic cells and indirectly provokes monocyte chemotaxis by induction of cooperating CC and CXC chemokines

Serum amyloid A (SAA) is an acute phase protein that is upregulated in inflammatory diseases and chemoattracts monocytes, lymphocytes, and granulocytes via its G protein‐coupled receptor formyl peptide receptor like 1/formyl peptide receptor 2 (FPRL1/FPR2). Here, we demonstrated that the SAA1α isoform also chemoattracts monocyte‐derived immature dendritic cells (DCs) in the Boyden and μ‐slide chemotaxis assay and that its chemotactic activity for monocytes and DCs was indirectly mediated via rapid chemokine induction. Indeed, SAA1 induced significant amounts (≥5 ng/mL) of macrophage inflammatory protein‐1α/CC chemokine ligand 3 (MIP‐1α/CCL3) and interleukin‐8/CXC chemokine ligand 8 (IL‐8/CXCL8) in monocytes and DCs in a dose‐dependent manner within 3 h. However, SAA1 also directly activated monocytes and DCs for signaling and chemotaxis without chemokine interference. SAA1‐induced monocyte migration was nevertheless significantly prevented (60–80% inhibition) in the constant presence of desensitizing exogenous MIP‐1α/CCL3, neutralizing anti‐MIP‐1α/CCL3 antibody, or a combination of CC chemokine receptor 1 (CCR1) and CCR5 antagonists, indicating that this endogenously produced CC chemokine was indirectly contributing to SAA1‐mediated chemotaxis. Further, anti‐IL‐8/CXCL8 antibody neutralized SAA1‐induced monocyte migration, suggesting that endogenous IL‐8/CXCL8 acted in concert with MIP‐1α/CCL3. This explained why SAA1 failed to synergize with exogenously added MIP‐1α/CCL3 or stromal cell‐derived factor‐1α (SDF‐1α)/CXCL12 in monocyte and DC chemotaxis. In addition to direct leukocyte activation, SAA1 induces a chemotactic cascade mediated by expression of cooperating chemokines to prolong leukocyte recruitment to the inflammatory site.     

Chemokines, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules on different human endothelia: discriminating the tissue-specific functions that affect leucocyte migration

The selective accumulation of different leucocyte populations during inflammation is regulated by adhesion molecules and chemokines expressed by vascular endothelium. This study examined how chemokine production and the expression of adhesion molecules and chemokine receptors vary between endothelia from different vascular beds. Human saphenous vein endothelium was compared with lung and dermal microvascular endothelia and with umbilical vein endothelium and a bone-marrow endothelial cell line. All endothelia produced CCL2 and CXCL8 constitutively, whereas CXCL10 and CCL5 were only secreted after tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha or interferon (IFN)-gamma stimulation. In combination with TNF-alpha, IFN-gamma suppressed CXCL8 but enhanced CCL5 and CXCL10, whereas transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta reduced secretion of all chemokines. Basal chemokine secretion was higher from umbilical vein than other endothelial cells. Chemokine receptors, CXCR1, CXCR3 and CCR3, were present on all endothelia but highest on saphenous vein. CCR4, CCR5, CCR6, CXCR2, CXCR4 and CXCR5 were also detected at variable levels on different endothelia. The variation between endothelia in chemokine secretion was much greater than the variations in adhesion molecules, both on resting cells and following cytokine stimulation. These results indicate that it is the tissue-specific variations in endothelial chemokine secretion rather than variations in adhesion molecules that can explain the different patterns of inflammation and leucocyte traffic seen in non-lymphoid tissues.     

Synergy between proinflammatory ligands of G protein-coupled receptors in neutrophil activation and migration

The chemokine dose and the time period during which the chemotactic gradient is established determine the number of leukocytes that infiltrate inflamed tissues. At suboptimal chemokine concentrations, neutrophils may require a priming agent or a second stimulus for full activation. An interesting mode of cooperative action to reach maximal migration is synergy between chemokines. This was first observed between the plasma CC chemokine regakine-1 and the tissue CXC chemokine ligand interleukin-8 (IL-8/CXCL8) in neutrophil chemotaxis. Addition of antibodies against IL-8 or regakine-1 in the Boyden microchamber assay abrogated this synergy. Other CC chemokines, such as CC chemokine ligand-2 monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1/CCL2), MCP-2 (CCL8), and MCP-3 (CCL7) as well as the CXC chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) agonist stromal cell-derived factor-1alpha (SDF-1alpha/CXCL12), also dose-dependently enhanced neutrophil chemotaxis toward a suboptimal concentration of IL-8. These chemokines synergized equally well with the anaphylatoxin C5a in neutrophil chemotaxis. Alternatively, IL-8 and C5a did not synergize with an inactive precursor form of CXCL7, connective tissue-activating peptide-III/CXCL7, or the chemoattractant neutrophil-activating peptide-2/CXCL7. In the chemotaxis assay under agarose, MCP-3 dose-dependently increased the migration distance of neutrophils toward IL-8. In addition, the combination of IL-8 and MCP-3 resulted in enhanced neutrophil shape change. AMD3100, a specific CXCR4 inhibitor, reduced the synergistic effect between SDF-1alpha and IL-8 significantly. SDF-1alpha, but not MCP-1, synergized with IL-8 in chemotaxis with CXCR1-transfected, CXCR4-positive Jurkat cells. Thus, proinflammatory chemokines (IL-8, MCP-1), coinduced during infection in the tissue, synergize with each other or with constitutive chemokines (regakine-1, SDF-1alpha) to enhance the inflammatory response.     

Chemokine and chemokine receptor analysis reveals elevated interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP)-10/CXCL10 levels and increased number of CCR5+ and CXCR3+ CD4 T cells in synovial fluid of patients with enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA)

Chemokines and chemokine receptors play a major role in homing of cells to the site of inflammation. Enthesitis-related arthritis (ERA) is a chronic inflammatory arthritis and no data are available on chemokines and their receptors in ERA. Blood (20) and synovial fluid (SF) (11) was collected from patients with ERA, and peripheral blood (PB) was collected from 12 patients with polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA), nine patients with systemic onset and 18 healthy controls. Chemokines [interleukin (IL)-10/CXCL10, thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC)/CCL17 and regulated upon activation normal T cell expressed and secreted (RANTES)/CCL5] were measured in serum and SF. Chemokine receptor expression was measured by flow cytometry. There was no difference in blood CD4(+) T cells bearing CCR5, CCR4 and CXCR3 in ERA and healthy controls. In paired samples the median frequency of CCR5(+) CD4(+) T cells was higher in SF compared to PB (15.8 versus 3.9%, P < 0.005), as was the frequency of CXCR3(+) T cells (21.61% versus 12.46%, P < 0.05). Median serum interferon-inducible protein-10 (IP-10)/CXCL10 levels were higher in patients with ERA compared to controls (139 versus 93 pg/ml; P < 0.05). Further median SF IP-10/CXCL10 levels were higher than the serum levels (2300 pg/ml versus 139 pg/ml; P < 0.01). Serum levels of RANTES/CCL5 were higher in patients (150 ng/ml) compared to control (99 ng/ml; P < 0.01). The SF levels were significantly lower compared to serum (P < 0.05). TARC/CCL17 levels in SF were lower than serum. There is increased homing of CCR5 and CXCR3(+) CD4 cells to the SF. Increased SF levels of IP-10/CXCL10 may be responsible for this migration in patients with ERA.