Prevention dof recurrent cytomegalovirus disease in renal and liver transplant recipients: effect of oral ganciclovir

Background: Although the primary treatment of symptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in organ transplant recipients is successful in >90% of individuals, relapsing disease, particularly in those with primary infection, remains an important problem. Previously, we had observed that the rate of symptomatic recurrence was >60% in those with primary disease (seronegative for CMV prior to transplant), and approximately 20% in those who were seropositive prior to transplant. The present study was undertaken to determine whether a maintenance regimen of oral ganciclovir for 2–3 months added to the routine 14–21 days of intravenous ganciclovir would further prevent symptomatic CMV recurrence. Methods: From May 1995 until June 1998, all kidney and liver transplant recipients with confirmed tissue‐invasive CMV disease or CMV syndrome were treated with 14–21 days of intravenous ganciclovir (5 mg/kg b.i.d. with dose adjusted for renal dysfunction) followed by 2–3 months of oral ganciclovir (2 g daily). The incidence of recurrence of CMV disease and/or viremia during and after oral therapy was then determined over a mean follow‐up of 530.6 days. Results: Thirty‐seven patients, 19 kidney and 18 liver transplant recipients, were studied; 5 had biopsy‐proven tissue‐invasive disease (13.5) and 32 suffered a CMV syndrome (86.5). Twenty‐one of these patients (58.6) were seronegative for CMV prior to transplant and received an allograft from a seropositive donor (D+/R?). Overall, 10 patients (27.0) developed CMV recurrence. Eight of 21 patients who were D+/R? for CMV (38.1) developed recurrence as opposed to 2 of 16 patients with other serologic status (12.5) (P=0.14). Patients with recurrent CMV disease and/or viremia had a peak antigenemia assay titer during their initial CMV event of 319.2 positive cells/2 slides compared with 109.8 positive cells/2 slides for patients without recurrent CMV infection (P=0.14); the trend of having a higher peak antigenemia assay titer among patients who recurred occurred both in patients who were at risk of primary CMV infection (D+/R? for CMV) and in those who were not. Two patients developed recurrent infection with strains of CMV that were resistant to ganciclovir. Conclusions: This new therapeutic regimen of oral ganciclovir following intravenous ganciclovir slightly reduced the overall rate of recurrent CMV disease and/or viremia, but it still did not adequately prevent CMV recurrence in patients who are at risk of primary infection prior to transplant. Of particular concern, 2 patients with primary infection treated with this regimen developed ganciclovir‐resistant recurrent disease ( Note Presented in part at the American Society of Transplant Physicians Meeting, May 1999, Chicago, Illinois.
).     

The prevalence of human herpesvirus-7 in renal transplant recipients is unaffected by oral or intravenous ganciclovir

The purpose of this study was to compare the prevalence of human herpesvirus (HHV)-7 and cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia and the effects of oral and intravenous (iv) ganciclovir in renal transplant recipients at risk for CMV. Stored lysates from peripheral blood leukocytes from 92 patients, who had been previously analyzed for CMV viremia by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 12 weeks after transplantation, were analyzed for HHV-7 viremia. Baseline and peak prevalences of HHV-7 viremia were 22% and 54%, respectively (P<. 0001). Eighty-two (89%) of 92 patients had at least 1 positive PCR for HHV-7. Oral ganciclovir and treatment with iv ganciclovir had no effect on the prevalence of HHV-7 viremia. In contrast, CMV was almost completely suppressed in patients who received oral ganciclovir, and when present, CMV responded to iv therapy. These results indicate that HHV-7 is resistant to ganciclovir at levels that were effective for prevention and treatment of CMV.     

Prevention of cytomegalovirus infection and disease after lung transplantation: results using a unique regimen employing delayed ganciclovir

BACKGROUND: Many lung transplant programs employ lengthy regimens of IV ganciclovir therapy to prevent disease due to cytomegalovirus (CMV). In 1994, we introduced a regimen of delayed ganciclovir prophylaxis for CMV infection. This consisted of 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir therapy, initiated 3 to 4 weeks after transplantation, with subsequent viral monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed. When not receiving ganciclovir, patients received oral acyclovir, 800 mg tid, for 6 months. CMV-seronegative patients with seropositive donors also received four doses of CMV hyperimmune globulin. This study analyzes the CMV outcomes of 54 patients who received the delayed regimen compared to 33 historical control subjects who received only acyclovir prophylaxis (n = 28) or oral acyclovir and 2 to 4 weeks of ganciclovir early after transplantation (n = 5). METHODS: CMV detection was by shell vial culture or IgG seroconversion; after 1996, CMV detection was by blood antigenemia. The diagnosis of CMV disease also required a typical clinical syndrome or pathologic evidence of CMV. The main outcome was the actuarial incidence of CMV infection and disease. In order to account for the effect of other important risk factors for CMV infection, the time to CMV infection and disease was also studied as dependeant variables in a Cox proportional-hazard analysis, with the delayed regimen and other important risk factors as independent variables. RESULTS: The delayed regimen reduced the actuarial incidence of CMV infection from 80 to 48% (p < 0.001) and CMV disease from 31 to 10% (p < 0.01). No seropositive patient receiving the delayed regimen developed CMV disease. Twelve of the 54 patients in the study group required additional IV antiviral treatment, but the total use of ganciclovir averaged only 18 days per patient. In a Cox proportional-hazards model, the use of delayed ganciclovir was the only factor that showed a significant association with freedom from CMV infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.43; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24 to 0.75; p = 0.003) and CMV disease (HR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.86; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: A regimen of CMV prophylaxis employing 2 weeks of IV ganciclovir initiated 3 to 4 weeks after lung transplantation followed by virologic monitoring and preemptive therapy as needed provides good protection against CMV disease.     

Patterns of cytomegalovirus infection in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone with ganciclovir prophylaxis

Abstract: Background: The impact of tacrolimus (TAC), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and steroid immunosuppression on cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in combination with ganciclovir prophylaxis in simultaneous kidney–pancreas transplantation (SKPT) has not been well studied. Methods: A retrospective analysis was made of 75 SKPTs performed between 1 January 1996 and 7 January 1999. All patients received ganciclovir for 3 months, but CMV donor (D)+/ recipient (R)? patients received ganciclovir for 6 months. Results: 16/74 (22%) were CMV D+/R?, 25 (33%) D+/R+, 16 (22%) D?/R+, and 17 (23%) D?/R? (1 patient with unknown donor serology was excluded). The mean time to CMV infection was 198 days post‐transplant. The incidence of either CMV infection or tissue invasive CMV disease was 16/74 (22%), including 9 (12%) with CMV infection and 7 (10%) CMV disease. The one‐year patient, kidney, and pancreas graft survival rates were 91%, 89%, and 83%, respectively. The mean follow‐up was 29 months (minimum of 12 months). CMV infection was not associated with an increased incidence of graft failure or mortality. The D+/R? group had the highest incidence of CMV infection (44%) compared with the other serologic groups (17%, P=0.02). Concurrent CMV and rejection occurred more frequently in the D+/R? than the other serologic groups (25% vs. 7%, P=0.03). The D?/R? group had the best outcomes, with no CMV infection, improved kidney graft survival at the end of follow‐up (82% vs. 72%, P=0.04) and the highest event‐free survival (no CMV infection, rejection, or graft loss) when compared to the other groups (76% vs. 33%, P<0.01). Conclusions: Compared to previous studies, ganciclovir prophylaxis delayed the onset and reduced the severity of CMV infection in patients receiving TAC, MMF, and steroids. Despite ganciclovir prophylaxis, CMV seronegative patients receiving CMV D+ organs had worse outcomes than seronegative recipients receiving CMV D? organs.     

Low incidence of CMV viremia and disease after allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. Role of pretransplant ganciclovir and post-transplant acyclovir

To establish the incidence of CMV viremia after allogeneic blood stem cell transplantation, we studied 51 consecutive allogeneic peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) transplant recipients. A total of 12 recipients were at moderate risk for CMV disease and 39 were at high risk. Conditioning regimens varied, but GvHD prophylaxis consisted of tacrolimus and mini-methotrexate in all patients. All patients received prophylactic ganciclovir from admission until day -2 and prophylactic acyclovir from day -1 until day 180 after transplantation. CMV viremia was treated with ganciclovir. Using a PCR-based technique, the cumulative incidence of CMV viremia was 31+/-14% by day 100 and 35+/-14% by day 150. Donor type, CMV risk group, underlying disorder, conditioning regimen, GvHD, and steroid use were not associated with the risk for CMV viremia. No cases of CMV disease occurred. We hypothesize that the low rate of CMV viremia and the absence of CMV disease in this cohort of PBSCT transplant recipients, which contrasts with other reports, may be related to the prophylactic use of high-dose acyclovir and possibly to pretransplant use of ganciclovir.     

Mycophenolate‐based graft versus host disease prophylaxis is not inferior to methotrexate in myeloablative‐related donor stem cell transplantation

We retrospectively reviewed 242 patients who received related donor myeloablative peripheral blood hematopoietic cell transplantation. We compared patients who received mycophenolate (MMF)/cyclosporine (CSA) (n = 71), to historical controls who received methotrexate (MTX)/CSA (n = 172). There were no differences in overall survival, nonrelapse mortality, and relapse. The MMF/CSA group had significantly faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment: medians of 13 versus 18 days and 10 versus 14 days, respectively (P = 0.001). The cumulative incidence of acute graft versus host disease (GVHD) (Grades, 2–4) was significantly lower in the MMF/CSA group (45.1 vs. 74.4%, P < 0.001). The MMF/CSA group showed a lower incidence of skin (51.5 vs. 72.1%, P < 0.001) and liver acute GVHD (11.3 vs. 54.2%, P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of lung (42.2 vs. 19.0%, P = 0.045), eye (59.7 vs. 30.1%, P < 0.001), and mouth (72.8 vs. 56.4%, P = 0.001) chronic GVHD but only eye chronic GVHD was confirmed in propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia was higher in the MMF/CSA group (55.8 vs. 39.6%, P < 0.001) but this was not confirmed in PSM analysis. MMF/CSA was identified as an independent favorable factor for acute GVHD (P < 0.001, hazard ratio, 0.41) but as a possible adverse risk factor for CMV viremia as this was not found to be statistically significant in PSM analysis. MMF/CSA in myeloablative matched related donor peripheral blood stem cell transplant is not inferior as GVHD prophylaxis in comparison with MTX/CSA and is associated with faster engraftment but a potentially higher risk of CMV viremia.Am. J. Hematol. 90:392–399, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Dynamics of cytomegalovirus replication during preemptive therapy with oral ganciclovir

The degree and dynamics of cytomegalovirus (CMV) replication were investigated in blood samples that were prospectively collected in the context of a placebo-controlled study evaluating the efficacy of preemptive oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV disease after liver transplantation. The degree of viral replication was strongly associated with progression to CMV disease or viremia (risk ratio, 8.8 and 51.5 among patients with virus loads < or =2860 and >2860 copies/10(6) peripheral blood leukocytes, respectively). Preemptive oral ganciclovir therapy diminished the incidence of CMV disease or viremia but did not completely suppress higher levels of CMV replication. Six (21%) of 29 patients had persistent CMV replication during preemptive oral ganciclovir therapy; 2 patients subsequently developed "breakthrough" CMV syndrome. This study identifies a relative cutoff virus load that predicts subsequent development of CMV disease and highlights the inability of oral ganciclovir to suppress CMV replication in a subset of patients.     

Late cytomegalovirus infection after oral ganciclovir prophylaxis in renal transplant recipients

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review our experience with a consecutive group of 41 renal transplant recipients (R) who received a kidney from a cytomegalovirus (CMV) seropositive donor (D(+)) and had 3 months of prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir. Patients were prospectively monitored clinically and with determinations of CMV antigenemia for at least 6 months. Patients were followed for a mean period of 247+/-16 days. CMV antigenemia developed in 51% of patients (53% D(+)R(-), 47% D(+)R(+)) after the transplant, but in no case was antigenemia seen during the period of oral ganciclovir therapy. Antigenemia developed at a median of 167 days post transplant (range 99-522 days) and peak antigen counts ranged from <1-3940, and tended to be higher in D(+)R(-) recipients. Infection was symptomatic in 67% of the antigenemic patients and symptoms tended to be more marked in the D(+)/R(-) than in the D(+)/R(+) group. All symptomatic patients were treated with intravenous ganciclovir (21 days) followed by 9 weeks of oral ganciclovir and responded with resolution of symptoms and antigenemia. No evidence of tissue-invasive disease was seen. Recurrence of antigenemia was observed exclusively in the D(+)R(-) group, occurred with less severe manifestations of CMV infection, and invariably responded to retreatment with ganciclovir. Our results suggest that oral ganciclovir prophylaxis is effective in preventing CMV infection during the 3-month period of prophylaxis, that a 3-month period of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient for D(+)R(+) recipients, but a longer period of oral ganciclovir prophylaxis may be needed in D(+)R(-) recipients. Clinicians caring for renal transplant recipients should be vigilant to the possibility of late CMV infection, especially in D(+)R(-) recipients.     

High-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation

We evaluated high-dose acyclovir and pre-emptive ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in myeloablative and non-myeloablative allogeneic stem cell transplantation. One hundred and seventy-four consecutive patients who were at risk for CMV infection (either recipient or donor seropositive) and received either intensive chemoradiotherapy and a T cell-depleted stem cell transplant followed by delayed add-back of donor T cells (TCDT: n = 98), or a non-myeloablative preparative regimen followed by an unmanipulated peripheral blood stem cell transplant (NMT: n = 76) from an HLA-identical sibling donor were studied. All received high-dose acyclovir (HDACV) from day - 7 for 3 months post-transplant in conjunction with weekly CMV pp65 antigenemia monitoring and pre-emptive treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (not CMV-specific) and ganciclovir. The actuarial probabilities of developing pp65 antigenemia were 83 +/- 4% after TCDT and 41 +/- 6% after NMT (P < 0.00001) with reactivation occurring earlier in the TCDT group (the median 36 days vs 55 days). We observed no reactivation of CMV in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor (n = 23). A total of 11 patients (5 in TCDT, 6 in NMT) developed CMV disease within 400 days after transplantation, and one death was clearly attributable to CMV interstitial pneumonitis (IP). This strategy was associated with effective control of CMV antigenemia in the majority of patients and near-complete eradication of fatal CMV IP.     

Failure of prophylactic ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus disease in recipients of lung transplants.

In an effort to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) pneumonitis, seven consecutive CMV-seronegative lung transplant recipients of organs from seropositive donors (D+/R-) were given ganciclovir, 2.5-5 mg/kg intravenously twice daily for the first 10-21 days after transplantation, and commercial polyvalent immune globulin, 200-400 mg/kg every 7-14 days intravenously, for the first 2-3 weeks after transplantation. This regimen was followed by oral acyclovir. Six patients developed CMV viremia and all developed CMV pneumonitis. Viremia occurred later in these patients compared with D+/R- patients who received alternative forms of CMV prophylaxis or CMV-seropositive recipients who received no specific prophylaxis (P = .023 and P = .021, respectively). There was no statistical difference in incidence or time to onset of CMV pneumonitis. When given as described, prophylactic ganciclovir and immune globulin followed by oral acyclovir may have delayed CMV viremia but did not prevent it or pneumonitis in high-risk lung transplant recipients.     

A randomized trial of preemptive therapy for prevention of cytomegalovirus disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

We studied the efficacy of two different doses of ganciclovir to prevent cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) recipients. We randomly assigned allogeneic HSCT recipients who had CMV infection to receive preemptive ganciclovir therapy with or without induction phase (5 mg/kg twice daily for 1 week). Thirty-two and thirty-six patients were randomized to the standard and the low-dose therapy group, respectively. The median time to CMV antigenemia or viremia clearance was 7 days (3–25 days) in the standard therapy group versus 11 days (3–69 days) in the low-dose therapy group (P = 0.540). The incidence of CMV disease was similar between the two groups (P = 0.366). The Kaplan–Meier estimate of event-free survival by day 180 after HSCT was 76.2% in the standard therapy group versus 66.7% in the low-dose therapy group (P = 0.590). Severe neutropenia (<0.5 × 10⁹/L) was observed in four (12.5%) patients in the standard therapy group versus two (5.6%) patients in the low-dose therapy group (P = 0.314). This study suggests that a low-dose ganciclovir preemptive therapy can be as effective as the standard-dose ganciclovir preemptive therapy for the prevention of CMV disease in allogeneic HSCT recipients.     

Allograft rejection predicts the occurrence of late-onset cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease among CMV-mismatched solid organ transplant patients receiving prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir.

The natural history of cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease associated with solid organ transplantation has been modified as a result of the widespread use of antiviral prophylaxis. Anecdotal reports have indicated a reduction of CMV disease at the expense of its later occurrence after completion of ganciclovir prophylaxis. The present study investigated the occurrence of CMV disease and its risk factors among 37 liver and kidney transplant recipients with CMV D+/R- status who received oral ganciclovir during the first 100 days posttransplantation. CMV disease occurred in 9 patients (24.3%) at a median of 144 days posttransplantation (range, 95-190 days). Allograft rejection was found to be strongly associated with the occurrence of late-onset CMV disease (risk ratio, 6.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-32.1; P=.02). Thus, CMV D+/R- solid organ transplant recipients receiving 3 months of oral ganciclovir who develop allograft rejection during the period of antiviral prophylaxis may benefit from extended and/or enhanced antiviral prophylaxis to prevent late-onset CMV disease.     

Cytomegalovirus pp65 antigenemia-guided early treatment with ganciclovir versus ganciclovir at engraftment after allogeneic marrow transplantation: a randomized double-blind study

To determine whether cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigenemiaguided ganciclovir treatment may be as effective, may require less treatment, and thus may cause less marrow toxicity than ganciclovir administered at engraftment, 226 marrow transplant recipients were randomized at engraftment to receive placebo (antigenemia-ganciclovir group) or ganciclovir (ganciclovir group) until day 100 in a double-blind study. In patients with antigenemia of 3 or more positive cells in 2 slides and/or viremia, study drug was discontinued and ganciclovir was started for at least 3 weeks or until negative CMV antigenemia and resumed only if antigenemia recurred. More patients in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group developed CMV disease before day 100 after transplantation compared with the ganciclovir group (14% v 2.7%, P = .002). Of the 16 patients with CMV disease before day 100 in the antigenemia-ganciclovir group, 10 (8.8%) had disease before or during the first episode of antigenemia and 6 (5.3%) developed disease after discontinuation of ganciclovir. Untreated low-grade antigenemia progressed to CMV disease in 19% of patients with grade 3-4 compared with 0% of patients with grade 0-2 acute graft-versus-host disease (P = .04). There was no significant difference in CMV disease by day 180 after transplantation and thereafter. CMV-related death, transplant survival, and neutropenia were not significantly different between the groups. In the ganciclovir group, more invasive fungal infections occurred (P = .03) and more ganciclovir was used (P < .0001). Thus, delaying the start of ganciclovir until highgrade antigenemia and discontinuing ganciclovir based on negative antigenemia results in more CMV disease by day 100 than ganciclovir administered at engraftment. However, ganciclovir at engraftment is associated with more early invasive fungal infections and more late CMV disease resulting in similar survival rates.     

Risk factors and clinical outcomes of pediatric liver transplant recipients with post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease in a multi‐ethnic Asian cohort

Background

We aimed to evaluate clinical characteristics, risk factors, and disease outcomes for liver transplant recipients (LTR) with post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD) at our center.

Methods

Retrospective review of data of all pediatric LTR (1991‐2015) was conducted.

Results

The overall incidence of PTLD was 16.4% (18/110), the majority (13/18) were early lesions, while 3/18 were polymorphic/monomorphic PTLD. The risk factors significant on univariate analysis were as follows: mean age (years) at transplant (1.66 vs 4.76, P = .006); age <2 years at transplant (odds ratio [OR] 3.53 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16‐10.73], P = .026); cytomegalovirus (CMV) primary infection (OR 11.39 [95% CI: 3.44‐37.7], P < .001); recipient CMV seronegativity (OR 7.50 [95% CI: 2.02‐27.78], P = .003); presence of CMV end‐organ disease (OR 4.00 [95% CI: 1.22‐13.16], P = .022); Chinese ethnicity; and higher mean duration of intravenous ganciclovir prophylaxis. In multivariate analysis, CMV primary infection (OR 5.22 [95% CI: 1.25‐21.87], P = .024), CMV seronegativity (OR 5.91 [95% CI: 1.13‐30.90, P = .035]), and having acute cellular rejections (ACR) prior to PTLD (OR 5.53 [95% CI: 1.43‐21.48, P = .013]) were significant risk factors for PTLD, with the latter two factors having a synergistic effect in increasing PTLD risk in a stratified analysis. The final multivariate model in predicting the risk of PTLD, utilizing CMV primary infection, recipient CMV seronegativity, and ACR before PTLD as predictive variables, was statistically significant (likelihood ratio chi square statistic = 25.18, P < .0001 with df = 3).

Conclusions

We report a unique clinicopathologic and risk factor profile in our cohort—early lesion PTLD accounts for the majority and the incidence of monomorphic PTLD remains low. In addition, we show a synergism between CMV naivety and ACR on PTLD risk, a higher prevalence of gastrointestinal manifestations, and a lack of significant association with Epstein‐Barr virus seronegativity.     

Randomized clinical trial of ganciclovir vs acyclovir for prevention of cytomegalovirus antigenemia after allogeneic transplantation

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease remains a major cause of morbidity following allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). In a prospective randomized trial, we tested prophylactic therapy with ganciclovir or acyclovir for patients at high risk of disease. Ninety-one CMV seropositive recipients of related (n = 53) and unrelated (n = 38) donor transplants were enrolled. All patients received intravenous (i.v.) ganciclovir 5 mg/kg every 12 h days -7 to -2, followed by acyclovir 10 mg/kg i.v. every 8 h from day -1 until neutrophil engraftment. Patients were then randomly assigned to either ganciclovir (n = 45) or acyclovir (n = 46) until day 100 post transplant. Any degree of antigenemia was treated with ganciclovir 5 mg/kg i.v. twice a day for 2 weeks, followed by 5 mg/kg i.v. each weekday for 6 weeks. At day 100, the cumulative incidence of antigenemia was 31% (95% CI 17-45%) for ganciclovir and 41% (95% CI 26-56%) (P = 0.22) for acyclovir prophylaxis, respectively. The assigned prophylaxis cohort did not predict for CMV antigenemia. The cumulative incidence of CMV disease at 12 months was 13% (95% CI 3-23%) and 17% (95% CI 6-28%) (P = 0.59) for the ganciclovir- and acyclovir-treated groups, respectively. An absolute neutrophil count (ANC) 相似文献   

High-dose acyclovir prophylaxis reduces cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant patients

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is still a major pathogen in liver transplantation (LTX). The clinical efficacy of prophylactic high-dose acyclovir therapy (800 mg qid) was assessed for the prevention of CMV infection and disease in liver recipients. Fifty-five patients were enrolled in a prospective, randomised, double-blind and placebo-controlled trial; 28 on acyclovir vs. 27 on placebo. The therapy was given for 12 weeks. The patients were followed for 24 weeks. CMV infection was diagnosed in 60% (16 on acyclovir, 17 on placebo) and CMV disease developed in 38% (7 on acyclovir, 14 on placebo) of the patients. The total mortality was 27% (6 on acyclovir, 10 on placebo). Acyclovir delayed 32% of the CMV infections and prevented 59% of the CMV disease cases which occurred in the placebo cohort. The time to CMV disease was significantly prolonged in patients on acyclovir as compared to patients on placebo (P=0.013). Adverse events included neurotoxicity which occurred in 5 cases in the acyclovir, but none in the placebo arm, and nephrotoxicity which was detected in 6 patients in the acyclovir and 5 in the placebo arm, respectively. We conclude that acyclovir prophylaxis significantly reduced the incidence of CMV disease, and delayed the onset of CMV infection in liver transplant patients.     

Comparing cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in renal transplantation: single center experience

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) presents a serious threat to CMV-seronegative recipients (R-), who have received an organ from a seropositive donor (D+). OBJECTIVES: We compared the effectiveness of three different prophylactic protocols in CMV D+/R- patients and reviewed data on patients who received no prophylaxis. Patients and methods: We reviewed 1137 kidney transplantations from 1995 to 2004. Of these, 147 recipients were CMV negative (D+/R-); 125 patients received CMV prophylaxis. Group I received CMV hyperimmune gammaglobulin only, group II received CMV hyperimmune gammaglobulin plus oral ganciclovir, and group III received prophylaxis with oral ganciclovir only. RESULTS: In group I, CMV infection was observed in 31 of 53 patients (59%), and CMV disease was diagnosed in 9 (17%) during the prophylaxis. In the first year post transplant, a total of 41 of 53 patients (77.5%) had primary CMV infection. In group II, CMV infection occurred in 7 of 30 patients (23%), and CMV disease was diagnosed in only 2 (7%) during prophylaxis. In the first year post transplant, a total of 9 of 30 patients (30%) had primary CMV infection. In group III, 9 of 42 patients (21%) developed CMV infection during prophylaxis, and CMV disease was not observed. In the first year post transplant, a total of 13 of 42 patients (30%) had primary CMV infection. In contrast, all 22 CMV D+/R- patients without prophylaxis developed CMV infection (100%); CMV disease was diagnosed in 10 (45%), and 1 patient died. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylaxis with hyperimmune gammaglobulin and/or oral ganciclovir significantly reduces CMV infection and disease. Prophylaxis with ganciclovir was significantly more effective than hyperimmune gammaglobulin monoprophylaxis, and more cost effective than combined prophylaxis.     

Sequential treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease with a short course of intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral valganciclovir: efficacy,safety, and pharmacokinetics

A. Caldés, S. Gil‐Vernet, Y. Armendariz, H. Colom, L. Pou, J. Niubó, L. Lladó, J. Torras, N. Manito, G. Rufí, J.M. Grinyó. Sequential treatment of cytomegalovirus infection or disease with a short course of intravenous ganciclovir followed by oral valganciclovir: efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics
Transpl Infect Dis 2010: 12: 204–212. All rights reserved Abstract: Oral (p.o.) or intravenous (IV) ganciclovir (GCV) has been the first‐line agent for prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease in solid organ transplantation (SOT). The introduction of p.o. valganciclovir, with higher bioavailability than p.o. GCV, has proven to be a suitable approach toward outpatient p.o. therapy for CMV infection/disease. The present single‐arm, exploratory pilot trial performed with 21 patients investigates the efficacy and safety of a short therapeutic course (21 days) based on an initial IV treatment with GCV (5 mg/kg twice daily, for 5 days) followed by p.o. valganciclovir (900 mg twice daily, for 16 days) for CMV infection/disease in SOT patients. In all cases, doses were adjusted for renal function. Moreover, the study allowed comparison of exposure to GCV after p.o. valganciclovir with respect to IV GCV in the same patients. Response to treatment was monitored until day 180. Viral load eradication was achieved in 66.7% of patients, on day 21. Although not statistically significant, a trend was seen toward increased persistence of viral load on day 21 for patients with donor positive/recipient negative CMV serostatus or receiving either anti‐rejection therapy or polyclonal anti‐thymocyte globulin. CMV clinical infection recurred in 14.3% of patients, with higher recurrence rates in patients with risk factors for persistence of viremia. Exposures to GCV after using IV GCV or p.o. valganciclovir showed comparable values (P=0.054). This short course, combining initial IV GCV and subsequent p.o. valganciclovir, may provide effective exposure and therapeutic response in the treatment of CMV infection in SOT patients with adequate drug exposure and with the additional potential benefit of shortening the length of hospital stay, which may result in cost reduction and improved patient comfort.     

Valganciclovir is an effective prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus disease in liver transplant recipients

Objectives:

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality among solid organ transplant recipients. Prophylaxis using valganciclovir (VGCV) in orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients is not approved by the Food and Drug Administration and its use is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of VGCV in CMV prophylaxis in OLT recipients.

Methods:

We carried out a retrospective, single-centre study including all OLT procedures performed during 2005–2008. Patients with early death (at ≤30 days), without CMV serology or prophylaxis, or with follow-up of <1 year were excluded.

Results:

The overall incidence of CMV disease was 6% (n = 9). The ganciclovir (GCV) and VGCV groups had similar incidences of CMV disease (4.6% vs. 7.0%; P = 0.4) and similar distributions of disease presentation (CMV syndrome vs. tissue-invasive CMV; P = 0.4). Incidences of CMV infection, as well as disease presentation, were similar between the high-risk (CMV D+/R−) and non-high-risk groups (P = 0.16). Although acute cellular rejection occurred more frequently in patients who developed CMV disease (P = 0.005), overall survival in these patients did not differ from that in patients who did not develop CMV infection (P = 0.5).

Conclusions:

Valganciclovir is an effective antiviral for the prevention of CMV disease in liver transplant recipients. Our data support its use in high-risk OLT patients.     

Valganciclovir prophylaxis in patients at high risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in antiviral therapies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) remains the leading opportunistic infection in the transplant population. Valganciclovir (VGC), the L-valyl ester prodrug of ganciclovir (GCV), provides an excellent oral alternative to GCV for the prevention of CMV in transplant recipients. We investigated the use of VGC for CMV prevention in high-risk renal and pancreas transplant recipients. METHODS: Patients at high risk for development of CMV disease were defined as either those who had donor positive, recipient-negative serostatus (D+/R-), or those who received antilymphocyte antibody (ALA) therapy for either rejection treatment or induction. A retrospective review was conducted of all kidney and pancreas transplants performed between August 2001 and December 2003. A total of 341 transplants were performed, of which 109 received VGC, and 88 were included in this analysis. RESULTS: The overall incidence of CMV disease was 5.7% (5/88). All of the CMV episodes were in patients who were D+/R- (17.2% [5/29] versus 0% [0/59], P<0.001). Of these patients, all the episodes of CMV were in patients who received VGC prophylaxis for<100 days post transplant (29% [5/17] versus 0% [0/12], P=0.06). The overall incidence of leukopenia was 11% and thrombocytopenia was 7%, with the incidence between the D+/R- group and the ALA group being similar. CONCLUSION: VGC is an effective agent in preventing CMV disease in kidney and pancreas transplant recipients who are at high risk for developing the disease. The optimal length of prophylaxis in D+/R- patients is still undefined, while 3 months of prophylaxis appears to be sufficient in patients who received ALA therapy.