Hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany: a retrospective epidemiological study from a low-endemic area

AIMS/BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken in order to assess the main features of hepatocellular carcinoma in Germany, a country with low incidences of this tumor. METHODS: Two hundred and eighty consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinomas admitted to the Medical School Hannover between 1993-1997 were retrospectively studied. RESULTS: Reliable data for the assessment of the etiology and the tumor stage of HCC were available for 268 patients. The female/male ratio was 1/4. In 51.9% of the patients, HCC was associated with hepatitis virus B or C (HBV, HCV) infection: 35.1% with HBV, 26.9%) with HCV and 10% coinfection with HBV/HCV This result emphasizes the major impact of HBV and HCV infection in liver cancer in Germany. Of all patients with HCC 74.6%) had liver cirrhosis. The predominant majority of the HCC (87%) were restricted to the liver: in only 5.9% could regional lymph node metastases as well as 8.5%) metastases in other organs be clinically diagnosed by chest X-ray, computed tomography scan or sonography. Data to asses the Okuda tumor stage were available for 166 patients: 47% were classified as stage I, 47% as stage II and only 6% as stage III. Serum AFP were determined in 195 patients. In 66% of the patients, the AFP value was elevated, but only in 30% did the AFP level reach the value of 500 microg/l, which is considered to be significant for HCC diagnosis in patients with liver cirrhosis. The proportion of liver cirrhosis was higher in HCV (97.8%) versus HBV (80.6%) associated HCC, which was the only significant (p<0.05) difference in the characteristics of HCC according to the etiology. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that liver cirrhosis is the prime risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis in Germany. However, the very high proportion of hepatitis virus related HCC, in particular the high proportion of HBV infections, contradicts the common view that alcohol is by far the most important etiological factor for hepatocarcinogenesis in low hepatitis virus endemic areas such as Germany.     

Minor Role of Hepatitis B and C Virus Infection in the Etiology of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in a Low-Endemic Area

Background: The etiologic role of hepatitis B (HBV) and C virus (HCV) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a low-endemicity area is obscure. Methods: Patients suspected of having primary liver cancer (PLC) in Göteborg, Sweden (n = 113), were tested serologically for HBV surface antigen and antibodies to HBV surface and core antigens. The presence of HBV surface and core antigens in cancer and non-neoplastic liver tissue in HCC cases was investigated immunohistochemically. Antibodies to HCV were tested by third-generation tests. The prevalence of HBV and HCV infection was compared in 73 patients with HCC and 32 patients with a final diagnosis other than PLC. Results: No patient had signs of chronic HBV infection. Seven of 64 (11%) HCC patients were anti-HCV-positive, compared with 1 of 31 (3%) without PLC. All seven patients with HCC and HCV infection had liver cirrhosis, and two were alcoholics. Alcoholism was judged the commonest (42%) cause of cirrhosis. Conclusion: Contrary to areas with a high incidence of HCC, chronic viral hepatitis, particularly HBV, seems to play a minor etiologic role for HCC in Sweden compared with alcohol-related cirrhosis.     

Impact of occult hepatitis B virus infection and prior hepatitis B virus infection on development of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with liver cirrhosis due to hepatitis C virus

Objective. Although hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA can be detected in liver or sera of patients without serum hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), its clinical relevance in hepatocarcinogenesis remains controversial. This observational cohort study was conducted to clarify the risk factors, including the presence of serum HBV DNA and hepatitis B core antibody (anti-HBc), for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver cirrhosis (LC). Material and methods. The study comprised 123 patients with LC due to HCV, and negative for HBsAg. The risk factors for HCC development were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Serum samples were assayed for HBV DNA using real-time polymerase chain reaction. Results. Serum HBV DNA was detectable in 14 patients (11.4%) and serum anti-HBc in 96 (78.0%). During the follow-up period (mean 53.3 months), 80 patients (65.0%) developed HCC. The cumulative HCC development rate was significantly higher in the anti-HBc-positive group than in the anti-HBc-negative group (p=0.0039), but did not differ between the serum HBV DNA-positive and -negative groups (p=0.8570). The multivariate analysis indicated that male gender, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) 20 ng/ml or greater, average serum alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) 80 IU/l or greater and the presence of anti-HBc were independent risk factors for development of HCC (p=0.038, p=0.013, p=0.020 and p=0.001, respectively). Conclusions. Serum anti-HBc, which indicates a previous HBV infection, has clinical significance in hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with HCV-related LC, but serum HBV DNA does not. Therefore, anti-HBc in serum is a significant predictor for HCC.     

Significance of hepatitis B virus surface antigen, hepatitis C virus expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and pericarcinomatous tissues

AIM： To investigate the correlation between hepatitis B virus surface antigen （HBsAg）, hepatitis C virus （HCV） expression in hepatocellular carcinoma （HCC）, the HAI score of the noncancerous region of the liver and the serum Alpha fetoprotein （AFP） level.
METHODS： The patterns of HBsAg and HCV in 100 cases of HCC and their surrounding liver tissues were studied on paraffin-embedded sections with immunohistochemistry, the histological status was determined by one pathologist and one surgeon simultaneously using the hepatitis activity index （HAIl score, and AFP was detected by radioimmunity. The study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for HCC. Based on HBsAg and HCV expression, the patients were classified into 4 groups： patients positive for HBsAg （HBsAg group）, patients positive for HCV （HCV group）, patients negative for both HCV and HBsAg （NBNC group） and patients positive for both HBsAg and HCV （BC group）.
RESULTS： The BC group had significantly higher HAI scores than the other three groups. （BC 〉 HCV 〉 HBsAg 〉 NBNC）. HBV and HCV virus infection was positively correlated with HAI （rs = 0.39, P = 0.00011. The positive rate of AFP （85.7%） and the value of AFP （541.2 ng/mL） in the group with HBV and HCV co-infection were the highest among the four groups. The positive rate （53.3%） of AFP and the value of AFP （ 53.3 ng/mL） in the group with none-infection of HBV and HCV were the lowest. HBV and HCV virus infection was positively correlated with AFP（rs = 0.38, P = 0.0001）.
CONCLUSION： The AFP increase in patients with liver cancer was positively correlated with the infection of HBV and HCV. The-serum AFP elevation by the infection of HBV and HCV is one of mechanisms which lead to hepatocarcinogenesis, and the antivirus intervening treatment of hepatitis is significant for the prognosis of liver cancer. From our Spearman＇s rank correlation analysis, we can conclude that the severity of virally induced     

Hepatitis B Virus Gene in Liver Tissue Promotes Hepatocellular Carcinoma Development in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

The hepatitis B virus (HBV) gene has been detected in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) tissue negative for the hepatitis B surface antigen and positive for the hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody, but the precise role of the HBV gene in hepatocarcinogenesis has yet to be clarified. We studied the HBV gene in liver tissue several years before the emergence of HCC. Eleven patients diagnosed with HCV-positive chronic liver disease and who developed HCC were assigned to group A. HBV DNA was detected in 8 of the 11 patients (73%). Twenty-five patients, who did not develop HCC, were selected as group B. Six of the group B patients were classified as DNA-positive (24%). The HBV DNA in liver tissue was found to be significantly related to HCC development (P < 0.01). Thus, the presence of the HBV gene in patients with chronic HCV associated-liver injury appears to promote hepatocarcinogenesis, although prospective studies are needed to confirm this result.     

Evaluation of serum clusterin as a surveillance tool for human hepatocellular carcinoma with hepatitis B virus related cirrhosis

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common human cancer worldwide. The levels of serum clusterin in HCC patients and its potential diagnostic significance is not clear. We aimed to evaluate the clinical use of serum clusterin levels as a surveillance tool for HCC with hepatitis B virus (HBV) related cirrhosis. Methods: Twenty‐two cases of healthy subjects, 31 cases of HBV carriers, 26 patients with chronic hepatitis B, 29 patients with cirrhosis, and 76 patients with HCC were enrolled in this study. Serum levels of clusterin were measured by a sandwich enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The serum clusterin levels in HCC patients were significantly lower than that in healthy, HBV carriers and chronic hepatitis B, but statistically higher than in cirrhosis patients. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve indicated that a serum clusterin value of 50 µg/mL yielded the best sensitivity (91%) and specificity (83%) for differentiating HCC patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis from those with HBV‐related cirrhosis. The optimal alpha fetoprotein (AFP) cutoff value was 15 ng/mL and was inferior to the clusterin value of 50 µg/mL, the area under the ROC curves being 0.937 versus 0.781, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Serum clusterin was more sensitive and specific than serum AFP for differentiating HCC patients with HBV‐related cirrhosis from those with HBV‐related liver cirrhosis, and may be a useful surveillance tool of HCC based on HBV‐related cirrhosis.     

Prospective screening increases the detection of potentially curable hepatocellular carcinoma: results in 8900 high-risk patients

Objectives

Historically, only 10% of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are diagnosed with early-stage, potentially curable disease. In this study, chronic hepatitis virus-infected patients were prospectively screened to determine: (i) the proportion of patients diagnosed with potentially curable HCC, and (ii) survival following curative therapy.

Methods

The study included 8900 chronic hepatitis virus-infected patients enrolled in a prospective screening programme, of whom 1335 (15.0%) were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), 7120 (80.0%) with hepatitis C virus (HCV), and 445 (5.0%) with both HBV and HCV. Screening was conducted every 6 months and included serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) measurement and ultrasonography. Curative treatments included liver transplantation, resection, radiofrequency ablation and/or ethanol injection.

Results

Hepatocellular carcinoma was diagnosed in 765 (8.6%) patients. Of 1602 patients with cirrhosis, 758 (47.3%) developed HCC. Curative treatment was possible in 523 (68.4%) of the 765 HCC patients. Two- and 5-year rates of overall survival in the curative treatment group were 65% and 28%, respectively, compared with 10% and 0% in the advanced disease group (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prospective screening of patients at high risk for the development of HCC increases the proportion of patients diagnosed with potentially curable disease. This may result in an increase in the number of longterm survivors. Screening strategies should focus on patients with chronic HBV or HCV infection who have progressed to cirrhosis because more than 40% of these patients will develop HCC.     

Roles of Alcohol, Hepatitis Virus Infection, and Gender in the Development of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

To assess the interaction of alcohol, hepatitis C virus (HCV), and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in hepatocarcinogenesis, we prospectively observed 449 patients with liver cirrhosis (LC) who presented to our outpatient clinics in 1 month; 164 patients with habitual drinking [alcoholic liver-liver cirrhosis (AL-LC)] who had taken ≥72 g alcohol/day (HCV-positive 81 cases: HCV + AL; HCV-negative 83 cases: AL); 176 patients with HCV infection, but without alcohol intake; 34 patients with HBV infection; 6 patients with HCV and HBV coinfection; and 82 patients with liver diseases from other etiologies, such as primary biliary cirrhosis. In the HCV group, the cumulative occurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was 9%, 18%, and 23% in the first, second, and third years, respectively. In the HCV + AL group, that was 13%, 17%, and 28%, respectively. There was no difference in the HCC occurrence rate between the two groups. In the AL group, the cumulative HCC occurrence rate was only 1% during the observation period of 3 years. The occurrence rate was significantly lower in the AL group, compared with the HCV and the HCV + AL groups. In the HBV group, the cumulative occurrence rate of HCC during the observation period of 3 years was 17%, which was similar to that of the HBV + AL group, 14%. We also examined some other variables that might be related to the development of HCC. The cumulative occurrence rate of HCC in male patients was 31%, whereas that was 18% in female patients. In the HCV group, there was a significant increase of HCC occurrence rate in male patients. In contrast, no difference was observed in the HCC occurrence rate between male and female patients in the HBV group. The present study suggests that alcohol alone may not be an independent risk factor for HCC, nor does it accelerate HCC development in LC patients with HCV and HBV infection during the prospective observation of 3 years.     

Analysis of serum α‐fetoprotein concentration in patients with viral hepatitis

OBJECTIVE: To investigate serum α‐fetoprotein (AFP) concentrations in patients with viral hepatitis. METHODS: Serum concentrations of total bilirubin (TB), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate amino­transferase (AST), albumin, globulin, AFP and viral markers were determined in 310 patients with pathologically proven viral hepatitis. The relation between the concentration of AFP and clinical manifestation, pathology, family history of liver malignant disease and virus type was studied. RESULTS: Serum AFP concentrations were elevated in 115 of the 310 patients (37.1%). According to the pathological diagnosis, the lowest positive rate of AFP was in acute hepatitis (11.7%), the highest was in chronic severe hepatitis (66.7%), the second highest in liver cirrhosis (57.5%), and chronic hepatitis was intermediate (34.2%). If the diagnosis was based on the clinical manifestation, the highest positive rate was found in chronic severe hepatitis, the lowest in chronic hepatitis, and acute hepatitis was intermediate. The positive rate of serum AFP by virus type was 35.5% for hepatitis B (HBV), superinfected with HAV or with HEV was 62.8%, and with HCV was 27.3%. Only one in six patients with HCV infection and none with simple HAV or HEV infection were positive for AFP. In patients with a family history of liver cancer, the positive rate of AFP was higher than in those without such a history (57.9%vs 38.2%; P = 0.75). CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that AFP positivity is not uncommon in patients with viral hepatitis and if the patient has an elevated concentration, it is highly likely to be HBV infection or HBV super­infected with HAV or HEV.     

Des-gamma-carboxyprothrombin, alpha-fetoprotein and AFP-L3 in patients with chronic hepatitis, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma

Background and Aim: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common complication in patients with chronic viral hepatitis. Detection of HCC at an early stage is critical for a favorable clinical outcome. The study aim was to: (i) compare the levels of des‐γ‐carboxyprothrombin (DCP), α‐fetoprotein (AFP) and AFP‐L3 in HCC patients and in chronic viral hepatitis patients without HCC; (ii) define the level of each tumor marker with the best sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis; and (iii) to correlate the levels of these markers with respect to size and tumor burden. Methods: Two hundred and forty patients with either hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection were studied. These included 144 with HCC, 47 with chronic hepatitis (fibrosis stage I–III on liver biopsy) and 49 with cirrhosis. Results: Levels of DCP, AFP and AFP L‐3 were significantly higher in patients with HCC than in those without HCC (P ≤ 0.0001). Receiver–operating curves (ROC) indicated that the cut‐off value with the best sensitivity and specificity for each test was ≥84 mAU/mL for DCP, ≥25 ng/mL for AFP and ≥10% for AFP‐L3. The sensitivity, specificity and positive predictive value (PPV) for DCP was 87%, 85% and 86.8%, for AFP 69%, 87% and 69.8%, and for AFP‐L3 56%, 90% and 56.1%, respectively. DCP levels were below the ROC cut‐off in all patients without HCC. In patients with single lesions, there was a direct correlation of DCP to tumor size. High levels of AFP correlated with diffuse type of HCC. All three markers were significantly elevated in the presence of metastatic HCC. No advantage was observed by combining two or three markers for HCC diagnosis. Conclusion: DCP had the highest sensitivity and PPV for HCC diagnosis, had a direct correlation with tumor size, and was not elevated in any patients without HCC. DCP should be used as the main serum test for HCC detection.     

Virologic analysis of non-B, non-C hepatocellular carcinoma in Japan: frequent involvement of hepatitis B virus

Serum and liver tissues from hepatitis B surface antigen-negative/anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV)-negative (non-B, non-C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients in Japan were examined for the presence of hepatitis B virus (HBV), HCV, and TT virus (TTV) by polymerase chain reaction. The studies evaluated the contribution of these viruses to pathogenesis of HCC. HBV DNA was detected in the sera of 20 (47.6%) of 42 non-B, non-C HCC patients, which was significantly higher than in age-matched controls without liver disease (P<.001). In 8 of 12 patients with liver tissues available, HBV DNA was detected in cancerous and adjacent noncancerous liver tissues. No HCV RNA was detected. The positivity for TTV DNA was not significantly different between HCC patients and controls. These results indicate that HBV is associated with a substantial proportion of non-B, non-C HCC cases in Japan. The role of HBV in hepatocarcinogenesis in such patients needs to be clarified.     

The contributions of hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus infections to cirrhosis and primary liver cancer worldwide

BACKGROUND/AIMS: End-stage liver disease accounts for one in forty deaths worldwide. Chronic infections with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) are well-recognized risk factors for cirrhosis and liver cancer, but estimates of their contributions to worldwide disease burden have been lacking. METHODS: The prevalence of serologic markers of HBV and HCV infections among patients diagnosed with cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was obtained from representative samples of published reports. Attributable fractions of cirrhosis and HCC due to these infections were estimated for 11 WHO-based regions. RESULTS: Globally, 57% of cirrhosis was attributable to either HBV (30%) or HCV (27%) and 78% of HCC was attributable to HBV (53%) or HCV (25%). Regionally, these infections usually accounted for >50% of HCC and cirrhosis. Applied to 2002 worldwide mortality estimates, these fractions represent 929,000 deaths due to chronic HBV and HCV infections, including 446,000 cirrhosis deaths (HBV: n=235,000; HCV: n=211,000) and 483,000 liver cancer deaths (HBV: n=328,000; HCV: n=155,000). CONCLUSIONS: HBV and HCV infections account for the majority of cirrhosis and primary liver cancer throughout most of the world, highlighting the need for programs to prevent new infections and provide medical management and treatment for those already infected.     

Alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) and AFP-L3 Is Most Useful in Detection of Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients after Tumor Ablation and with Low AFP Level

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary malignancy of the liver and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. While there are many risk factors for HCC including alcohol, obesity, and diabetes, hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection still account for the majority of HCC worldwide. Globally, HBV is the leading risk factor for HCC. Patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) and advanced liver disease are at high risk for HCC. Screening for HCC is done routinely with ultrasound with or without alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) at six-month intervals. The combination of ultrasound and AFP has been shown to provide some additional detection of 6–8% of cases compared to ultrasound alone; however, this also increases false-positive results. This is because AFP can be elevated not only in the setting of HCC, but also in chronic hepatitis, liver cirrhosis, or ALT flare in CHB, which limits the specificity of AFP. AFP-L3 is a subfraction of AFP that is produced by malignant hepatocytes. The ratio of AFP-L3 to total AFP is reported as a percentage, and over 10% AFP-L3 is consistent with a diagnosis of HCC. Here, we review five cases of patients with CHB, cirrhosis, and HCC, and their levels of AFP and the AFP-L3% at various stages of disease including ALT flare, cirrhosis, initial diagnosis of HCC, and recurrence of HCC. These cases emphasize the utility of AFP-L3% in identifying early, new or recurrent HCC prior to the presence of imaging findings.     

Risk factors for hepatocellular carcinoma in a cohort infected with hepatitis B or C

Background and Aim: The incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma ( HCC) has increased in Australia in recent decades, a large and growing proportion of which occurs among a population chronically infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, risk factors for HCC among these high‐risk groups require further characterization. Methods: We conducted a population‐based cohort study using HBV and HCV cases notified to the New South Wales Health Department between 2000 and 2007. These were linked to cause of death data, HIV/AIDS notifications, and hospital records. Proportional hazards regression was used to identify significant risk factors for developing HCC. Results: A total of 242 and 339 HCC cases were linked to HBV (n = 43 892) and HCV (n = 83 817) notifications, respectively. For both HBV and HCV groups, being male and increasing age were significantly associated with risk of HCC. Increasing comorbidity score indicated high risk, while living outside urban areas was associated with lower risk. Hazard ratios for males were two to three times those of females. For both HBV and HCV groups, cirrhosis, alcoholic liver disease, and the interaction between the two were associated with significantly and considerably elevated risk. Conclusion: This large population‐based study confirms known risk factors for HCC. The association with older age highlights the potential impact of HBV and HCV screening of at‐risk groups and early clinical assessment. Additional research is required to evaluate the impact of improving antiviral therapy on HCC risk.     

Hepatitis B and C virus infection as risk factors for liver cirrhosis and cirrhotic hepatocellular carcinoma: a case-control study

To investigate whether hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection are risk factors for liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a case-control study of 102 cirrhotic HCC patients, 102 sex-matched and age-matched patients with liver cirrhosis, and 102 matched patients with non-hepatic disease controls was performed. The prevalences of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to HCV (anti-HCV) in HCC (70.5%, 39.2%) and liver cirrhosis (74.5%, 27.4%) were higher than controls (16.6%, 10.5%) (P = 0.0001). In HBsAg-negative patients, the prevalence of anti-HCV in cirrhotic HCC (66.6%) and liver cirrhosis (46.1%) was higher than in controls (10.5%; P = 0.0001). There was no such difference in HBsAg-positive patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that both HBsAg and anti-HCV were important risk factors for HCC (odds ratio, 6.52 and 4.59, respectively) and liver cirrhosis (odds ratio, 4.22 and 2.29, respectively). There was no difference in odds ratio when HCC and liver cirrhosis were compared. Our result implies that both HBV and HCV are independent risk factors for cirrhotic HCC and liver cirrhosis in Taiwan.     

Hepatocellular carcinoma in southern Germany: epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics and risk factors

The aetiology of chronic liver disease leading to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and the clinical characteristics of patients with HCC vary considerably internationally and intranationally. This study analyses the characteristics of HCC patients in southern Germany, a low endemic area of HCC. METHODS: The files of 118 consecutive patients with HCC observed in a single tertiary care hospital between 1994 and 2000 have been reviewed. Epidemiological and clinicopathological characteristics such as age at presentation, ethanol consumption, serological hepatitis virus markers, and fibrosis were studied. Additionally, serum levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) were analysed at the time of diagnosis in 77 patients. RESULTS: The male:female ratio was 4:1 and the mean age at presentation was 61.8 years. Alcohol abuse (49.2%) and chronic hepatitis C infection (17.8%) were the most frequent risk factors. Histologically proven liver cirrhosis in the surrounding non-tumorous tissue was present in only 59.0% of cases. AFP levels were elevated in 78% of cases, but only 34% reached >500 ng/ml, a value considered to be significant for the diagnosis of HCC. AFP levels correlated with the stage of fibrosis. SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of AFP serum levels as a tumour marker is poor but might help to detect at least a minority of cases. As in other populations within Europe, chronic alcohol abuse is frequently associated with HCC in southern Germany, confirming that alcohol is still the most important risk factor for hepatocarcinogenesis in areas with low hepatitis virus prevalence. Considering the poor prognosis of HCC, prevention is of pivotal importance, particularly for patients with chronic liver disease and other risk factors for the development of HCC.     

Hepatic expression of the proliferative marker Ki-67 and p53 protein in HBV or HCV cirrhosis in relation to dysplastic liver cell changes and hepatocellular carcinoma

To evaluate hepatic expression of the nuclear proliferative marker Ki-67 and the p53 oncoprotein in hepatitis B virus (HBV)/HCV cirrhosis in relation to dysplastic liver cell changes and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We studied needle liver biopsies from 107 patients with cirrhosis and no HCC (52 HBV, 55 HCV) who had been assessed for protocol studies, and 57 cirrhotic patients with HCC (40 HBV, 17 HCV). We evaluated small and large cell dysplastic changes along with the expression of Ki-67 and p53 by immunohistochemistry. The labelling index (LI) was defined as the proportion (%) of positive-stained nuclei of the 500 measured. Large and small cell dysplastic changes were observed in 12 and 9% of specimens respectively. Only small cell changes were associated with Ki-67 expression. Ki-67 LI was 5.50 +/- 5.7 in cirrhosis (13.90 +/- 3.84 in those with small cell dysplastic changes vs 4.64 +/- 4.98 in those without, P < 0.01), 10.2 +/- 5.95 in cirrhosis with HCC (P < 0.05) and 18.56 +/- 10 in HCC (P < 0.01). Neither the presence of small cell dysplastic changes nor the expression of Ki-67 was related to severity or aetiology of cirrhosis. Expression of p53 was observed in 30% of the non-tumorous and in 53% of the neoplastic tissue obtained from patients with HCC, with no differences between HCV and HBV. Ki-67 and p53 expression was associated with the tumour grade (P < 0.001). Our observations clearly demonstrate the association between the proliferation activity and the morphological changes in the cirrhotic liver from the non-dysplastic to dysplastic lesion to HCC. They also support the hypothesis that p53 alterations are a rather late event in carcinogenesis and related to HCC grade. And finally, they suggest that the final steps of hepatocarcinogenesis are common and independent of the aetiology of the chronic viral infection.     

Characteristics and outcome of patients with dual hepatitis B and C‐associated hepatocellular carcinoma: are they different from patients with single virus infection?

Background: Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) caused by dual hepatitis B and C virus (HBV, HCV) infection may constitute a distinct disease group that is different from patients with single virus infection. This study compared the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with HBV, HCV and dual virus infection. Methods: A prospective database of 1215 HCC patients with chronic hepatitis B, C or dual virus infection was investigated. Results: Patients with HCV infection (n=388) were significantly older (mean age, 69 years) than patients with dual virus (n=75, 65 years) and HBV (n=752; 60 years) infection (P<0.0001). The male‐to‐female ratios for the HBV, dual virus and HCV groups were 5.2, 3.4 and 1.3 respectively (P<0.0001). Patients in the HBV group more often had higher total tumour volume (mean, 409 cm³) than those in the dual virus group (244 cm³) and HCV (168 cm³) group (P<0.0001). No significant differences of the severity of liver cirrhosis, performance status, cancer staging and tumour cell differentiation were noted among the three groups. Patients in the HCV group had a significantly poor survival in comparison with the HBV group only in the subset of patients with small tumour volume (<50 cm³) in the Cox proportional hazards model (relative risk, 1.44; P=0.041). Conclusions: Dual HBV and HCV virus infection does not accelerate the speed of HCC formation in patients with chronic hepatitis B, and appears to have a modified course of carcinogenesis pathway that is diverted away from the biological behaviour of HBV and HCV infection.     

Risk factors and prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in HCV infection

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Several risk factors for HCC development have been identified, including cirrhosis, hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. With regard to cirrhosis, multivariate analysis indicates that alcohol abuse, HBsAg positivity, and anti-HCV seropositivity are independent variables associated with an increased risk for HCC in the cirrhotic patient. A close relationship between chronic HBV infection and HCC has been established by epidemiological studies and laboratory investigations. Evidence indicates that HCV also plays a leading role in development of HCC. Most patients with HCV-related HCC develop the tumor as a consequence of long-standing infection accompanied by chronic and progressive liver damage. In our study of 290 consecutive patients with cirrhosis, patients with persistently elevated or fluctuating ALT levels had a significantly greater rate of HCC development. The mechanism of HCC development in HCV infection remains to be elucidated. The annual cumulative risk of developing HCC is approximately 1% in patients without cirrhosis at inclusion and 3–10% in those with cirrhosis, depending on the stage of cirrhosis and presence of etiological cofactors. Although some evidence suggests that patients infected with the HCV genotype 1b are at increased risk for development of more severe liver disease, including HCC, results of our prospective study do not support a difference between cirrhotic and noncirrhotic patients in terms of the natural course of cirrhosis and the rate of developing HCC based on genotype. Strategies to prevent HCV-related HCC include blood screening and treatment of chronic HCV infection with interferon-α. Recent studies suggest that interferon-α treatment may prevent the development of HCC in HCV infection. Further research is warranted.     

Hepatitis B virus DNA integration in hepatocellular carcinoma after interferon-induced disappearance of hepatitis C virus

OBJECTIVES: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been reported in patients in whom hepatitis C virus (HCV) was eliminated by interferon (IFN) therapy. We examined the pathogenesis of HCC in patients with sustained viral response. METHODS: Operable HCC developed in 7 of 342 patients cured of HCV infection by IFN monotherapy. No patient abused alcohol or had diabetes mellitus or obesity. Resected specimens of HCC were histologically evaluated. DNA extracted from HCC was examined by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to locate hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA. HBV integration sites in human genome were identified by cassette-ligation-mediated PCR. RESULTS: HBV DNA was not amplified in serum samples from any of the seven patients with HCC and was found in liver in four patients. In the latter four patients, HBV DNA was integrated into the human genome of HCC. In two of these patients, covalently closed circular HBV (cccHBV) was also detected. The patients with HBV DNA integration were free of HCV for more than 3 yr. In two of the three patients without HBV DNA integration, the surrounding liver showed cirrhosis. The liver of HCC with HBV DNA integration had not progressed to cirrhosis. Three of the four tumors with HBV integration had one integration site each, located at chromosomes 11q12, 11q22-23, and 22q11, respectively. The other tumor had two integration sites, situated at chromosomes 11q13 and 14q32. At chromosome 11q12, HBV DNA was integrated into protein-coding genome, the function of which remains unclear. CONCLUSION: Integrated HBV DNA may play a role in hepatocarcinogenesis after the clearance of HCV by IFN treatment.