A Critique of the Literature on Women’s Request for Cesarean Section

ABSTRACT: Background: The influence of women’s birth preferences on the rising cesarean section rates is uncertain and possibly changing. This review of publications relating to women’s request for cesarean delivery explores assumptions related to the social, cultural, and political‐economic contexts of maternity care and decision making. Method: A search of major databases was undertaken using the following terms: “c(a)esarean section” with “maternal request,”“decision‐making,”“patient participation,”“decision‐making‐patient,”“patient satisfaction,”“patient preference,”“maternal choice,”“on demand,” and “consumer demand.” Seventeen papers examining women’s preferred type of birth were retrieved. Results: No studies systematically examined information provided to women by health professionals to inform their decision. Some studies did not adequately acknowledge the influence of obstetric and psychological factors in relation to women’s request for a cesarean section. Other potential influences were poorly addressed, including whether or not the doctor advised a vaginal birth, women’s access to midwifery care in pregnancy, information provision, quality of care, and cultural issues. Discussion: The psychosocial context of obstetric care reveals a power imbalance in favor of physicians. Research into decision making about cesarean section that does not account for the way care is offered, observe interactions between women and practitioners, and analyze the context of care should be interpreted with caution. (BIRTH 34:4 December 2007)     

Women's Preference for a Cesarean Section: Incidence and Associated Factors

Background: Few studies have examined women's preferences for birth. The object of this study was to determine the incidence of women's preferred type of birth, and the reasons and factors associated with their preference. Methods: Three hundred and ten women between 36 and 40 weeks' gestation were recruited from the antenatal clinic of a major metropolitan teaching hospital and the consulting rooms of six private obstetricians in Brisbane, Australia. Participants completed a questionnaire asking about their preferred type of birth, reasons for their preference, preparation for childbirth, level of anxiety and concerns, and the influence of the primary caregiver. Results: Two hundred and ninety women (93.5%) preferred a spontaneous vaginal birth; 20 women (6.4%) preferred a cesarean section. Of the latter group, most had a current obstetric complication or experienced a previously complicated delivery (p <0.001); 1 woman (0.3%) preferred a cesarean section in the absence of any known current or previous obstetric complication. Women who preferred a cesarean section were more anxious, were generally poorly informed of the risks of this procedure, and/or overestimated the safety of the procedure. Conclusions: Women who preferred a cesarean section were more likely to have experienced this type of birth previously and to have negative feelings about it. To decrease women's preference for a cesarean section, practitioners should reduce the primary cesarean delivery rate and improve the quality of emotional care for women who require a cesarean section. Caregivers should engage in a sensitive discussion of the risks and benefits of various birth options, including a vaginal birth after cesarean, with women who have previously experienced a cesarean birth before they make decisions about mode of delivery in a subsequent pregnancy.     

Cesarean Section on Maternal Request: A Societal and Professional Failure and Symptom of a Much Larger Problem

The scientific literature was silent about a relationship of pelvic floor, urinary, and fecal incontinence and sexual issues with mode of birth until 1993, when Sultan et al's impressive rectal ultrasound studies were published. They showed that perirectal fibers were damaged in many vaginal births, but not as a result of a cesarean section. These findings helped to pioneer a new area of research, ultimately leading to increasing support among health professionals and the public that maternal choice of cesarean delivery could be justified—even that maternal choice and autonomous decision‐making trump other considerations, including evidence. A growing number of birth practitioners are choosing cesarean section for themselves—usually on the basis of concerns over pelvic floor, urinary incontinence, and sexual issues. Behind this choice is a training experience that focuses on the abnormal, interprets the literature through a pathological lens, and lacks sufficient opportunity to see normal childbirth. Cesarean section on maternal request is a complex issue based on fear and misinformation that is a symptom of a system needing reform, that is, a major change in community and professional education, governmental policy making, and creation of environments emphasizing the normal. Systemic change will require the training of obstetricians mainly as consultants and the education of a much larger cadre of midwives and family physicians who will provide care for most pregnant women in settings designed to facilitate the normal. Tinkering with the system will not work—it requires a complete refit. (BIRTH 39:4 December 2012)     

Attitudes of Midwives in Sweden Toward a Woman’s Refusal of an Emergency Cesarean Section or a Cesarean Section on Request

Background: A woman’s refusal or request for a cesarean section can be a problem for midwives and obstetricians working in maternity units. The objective of this study was to describe the attitudes of midwives in Sweden toward the obstetrician’s decision making in relation to a woman’s refusal of an emergency cesarean section and to a woman’s request for a cesarean section without a medical indication. Methods: The study has a cross‐sectional multicenter design and used an anonymous, structured, and standardized questionnaire for data collection. The study group comprised midwives who had experience working at a delivery ward at 13 maternity units with neonatal intensive care units in Sweden (n = 259). Results: In the case of a woman’s refusal to undergo an emergency cesarean section for fetal reasons, most midwives (89%) thought that the obstetrician should try to persuade the woman to agree. Concerning a woman’s request for a cesarean section without any medical indications, most midwives thought that the obstetrician should agree if the woman had previous maternal or fetal complications. The reason was to support the woman’s decision out of respect for her autonomy; the midwives at six university hospitals were less willing to accept the woman’s autonomy in this situation. If the only reason was “her own choice,” 77 percent of the midwives responded that the obstetrician should not comply. Conclusions: The main focus of midwives seems to be the baby’s health, and therefore they do not always agree with respect to a woman’s refusal or request for a cesarean section. The midwives prefer to continue to explain the situation and persuade the woman to agree with the recommendation of the obstetrician. (BIRTH 38:1 March 2011)     

Elective Cesarean Section and Decision Making: A Critical Review of the Literature

ABSTRACT: Background: The cesarean section rate continues to rise in many countries with routine access to medical services, yet this increase is not associated with improvement in perinatal mortality or morbidity. A large number of commentaries in the medical literature and media suggest that consumer demand contributes significantly to the continued rise of births by cesarean section internationally. The objective of this article was to critically review the research literature concerning women’s preference or request for elective cesarean section published since that critiqued by Gamble and Creedy in 2000. Methods: A search of key databases using a range of search terms produced over 200 articles, of which 80 were potentially relevant. Of these, 38 were research‐based articles and 40 were opinion‐based articles. A total of 17 articles fitted the criteria for review. A range of methodologies was used, with varying quality, making meta‐analysis of findings inappropriate, and simple summaries of results difficult to produce. Results: The range and quality of studies had increased since 2001, reflecting continuing concern. Women’s preference for cesarean section varied from 0.3 to 14 percent; however, only 3 studies looked directly at this preference in the absence of clinical indications. Women’s preference for a cesarean section related to psychological factors, perceptions of safety, or in some countries, was influenced by cultural or social factors. Conclusions: Research between 2000 and 2005 shows evidence of very small numbers of women requesting a cesarean section. A range of personal and societal reasons, including fear of birth and perceived inequality and inadequacy of care, underpinned these requests. (BIRTH 34:1 March 2007)     

Estimating the Rate of Cesarean Section by Maternal Request: Anonymous Survey of Obstetricians in Australia

Background: The rate of cesarean section in Australia now exceeds 30 percent, and evidence from population studies indicates that maternal requests for elective cesarean delivery might make an important contribution. The objective of this study was to explore the rate of such deliveries in Australia, in the absence of a formal investigation. Methods: An anonymous survey was sent to all 1,239 specialist obstetricians and 317 obstetric specialty trainees in Australia. Specialists were asked the number of elective cesarean deliveries they performed in 2006 that satisfied the National Institutes of Health definition of maternal request cesarean delivery. Trainees were asked whether they intended to agree to maternal requests for cesarean section in their future specialist practice. Results: The response rate from specialists was 98.6 percent, and from trainees was 81 percent. To account for possibility of multiple submissions, we performed two analyses: one using all responses, the other after removing 297 surveys in the second mail‐out that were identical to surveys received from the first mail‐out (n = 735). Proportions were similar in both groups. We estimated that between 8,553 and 12,434 maternal request cesarean sections were performed in Australia in 2006, representing at least 17 percent of all elective cesarean sections, and slightly more than 3 percent of all births. Conclusion: Maternal request is an important contributor to cesarean section rates in Australia.     

Uterine Artery Pseudoaneurysm after Cesarean Section: Case Report and Literature Review

Uterine artery pseudoaneurysm (UAP) occurs rarely and can develop after various gynecologic or obstetric procedures. The delayed diagnosis of this disease often results in life-threatening hemorrhage. Herein is described a case of UAP after cesarean section. The patient visited our emergency outpatient department 99 days after cesarean section because of abnormal uterine bleeding, which was diagnosed as UAP using color Doppler ultrasonography and contrast medium–enhanced computed tomography. Selective transcatheter arterial embolization was performed to resolve the lesion without complications. We also conducted a review to identify the demographic etiology of UAP. A PubMed search yielded 57 cases reported in the English literature. The most frequent cause of UAP was cesarean section, which accounted for 47.4% of all cases. The mean interval between the incident and the symptoms was approximately 2 weeks, regardless of cause. At analysis of 17 cases diagnosed within a day, it became evident that the definitive diagnosis was made at angiography (41.2%), computed tomography (29.4%), or color Doppler ultrasonography (29.4%). Almost all cases (94.1%) were conservatively treated with transcatheter uterine artery embolization. Consideration of UAP in the differential diagnosis is crucial for proper treatment before rupture and to preserve fertility.     

Women's Attitudes Toward Mode of Delivery in South Korea—a Society with High Cesarean Section Rates

Abstract: Background : In South Korea, cesarean section rates (i.e., the proportion of all live births delivered by cesarean section) approached 40 percent in 2000. The relative contribution of physicians and women to this high rate has been a source of debate. This study explored attitudes toward mode of delivery among South Korean women. Methods : A nationwide cross‐sectional telephone survey of 505 Korean women aged 20 to 49 years was conducted using a proportionate quota and systematic random sampling method. The response rate was 57.3 percent. Data were collected using a structured questionnaire consisting of 7 questions about vaginal and cesarean delivery. Results : Over 95 percent of women preferred vaginal delivery during pregnancy and were willing to recommend this method to others. Of the women who delivered by cesarean section, 10.6 percent stated that they had requested a cesarean birth. Attitudes toward vaginal or cesarean delivery differed significantly according to a woman's education level. Conclusions : Most study participants showed more favorable attitudes toward vaginal delivery than cesarean delivery. This result does not support the assumption that the upsurge of cesarean section rates in South Korea is associated with women's positive attitudes toward cesarean section. The main cause of the rapid rise of cesarean section rates in South Korea during the past two decades have its origins in health care practitioners and the health care system in which they work.     

Cesarean Section Rates in Teaching Hospitals: A National Survey

ABSTRACT: This survey investigated the cesarean section rate in teaching hospitals in the United States and the factors that may influence it. A national survey was performed by mailing a questionnaire to 277 accredited residency programs in obstetrics and gynecology. The estimated cesarean rate in all hospitals, with residencies in obstetrics and gynecology in the United States in 1990 was 20.3 percent, compared with an overall national rate of 23.5 percent. Women delivering in teaching hospitals were less likely to have a cesarean section than those delivering in hospitals without residency programs (odds ratio = 0.77, 95% CI 0.77–0.78, p = 0.0001). As centers for training and research, teaching hospitals represent an appropriate setting to begin the process of lowering the United States cesarean section rate.     

PRETERM BIRTH PREVENTION PROGRAMS: A Critique of Current Literature

Published reports of the effectiveness of preterm birth prevention programs have produced mixed results. Many larger observational studies suggest benefit. The randomized trials, however, suggest no effect on reducing rates of preterm birth in high-risk populations. This article reviews and critiques these reports and suggests areas for further research.     

A Survey of Cesarean Childbirth Education Classes and a Hospital Parent Education Program For Repeat Cesarean Delivery

ABSTRACT: The couple who anticipate a cesarean delivery may find difficulty preparing themselves for this type of childbirth. While such parents share the needs of others who are giving birth, they also present special needs that are not met within the usual prenatal or Lamaze class format. This article describes a survey of cesarean classes in the United States, and a “Preparation for Cesarean Delivery” class offered at a university teaching hospital. Suggested class content as well as the emotional aspects of the scheduled cesarean delivery are discussed.     

Report of a Breech Cesarean Section Maternal Death

In Australia in 2007, a woman with two previous normal vaginal deliveries underwent an emergency cesarean section at full dilatation of the cervix with a breech presentation. The woman died after a severe hemorrhage. The official Coroner’s Report attributed the cause of death to postpartum hemorrhage, whereas the breech presentation was barely mentioned, suggesting that complications with breech cesarean deliveries are under‐appreciated and under‐reported. (BIRTH 38:2 June 2011)     

Strategies to Address Global Cesarean Section Rates: A Review of the Evidence

Background: The steadily increasing global rates of cesarean section has become one of the most debated topics in maternity care. This paper reviews and reports on the success of strategies that have been developed in response to this continuing challenge. Methods: A literature search identified studies conducted between 1985 and 2001 from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Medline, Sociofile, Current Contents, Psyclit, Cinahl, and EconLit databases. An additional search of electronic databases for Level 1 evidence (systematic reviews), Level 2 (randomized controlled trials), Level 3 (quasi‐experimental studies), or Level 4 (observational studies) was performed. Selection criteria used to identify studies for review included types of study participant, intervention, outcome measure, and study. Results: Interventions that have been used in an attempt to reduce cesarean section rates were identified; they are categorized as psychosocial, clinical, and structural strategies. Two clinical interventions, (external cephalic version, vaginal birth after a previous cesarean) and one psychosocial intervention (one‐to‐one trained support during labor) demonstrated Level 1 evidence for reducing cesarean section rates. Conclusions: Although the evidence for one‐to‐one care and external cephalic version came from both developed and developing settings, the systematic review for vaginal birth after a cesarean was restricted to studies conducted in the United States. The effective implementation of the preceding strategies to reduce cesarean rates may depend on the social and cultural milieu and on associated beliefs and practices. (BIRTH 29:1 March 2002)     

Exploratory Study of Women's Reactions to Having a Cesarean Birth

ABSTRACT: One hundred and five women who had cesarean sections were interviewed to assess their feelings about their births. Forty-one percent of the women were told they had to have a cesarean fewer than two hours before, and 35% were repeat cesareans. Statistical data are presented on women's reasons for feeling cesareans were harder, easier, or not different, including the finding that 30% felt relief at having a cesarean. Sources of stress and negative feelings after cesareans are discussed.     

Maternal Request for Cesarean Section due to Fear of Birth: Can It Be Changed Through Crisis‐Oriented Counseling?

ABSTRACT: Background: A psychosocial team was established to meet the needs of an increasing number of pregnant women referred for fear of birth who wished a planned cesarean. This study describes the intervention, the women’s psychosocial problems in relation to degree of fear of birth, changes in their wishes for mode of birth and birth outcome, women’s satisfaction with the intervention, and their wishes for future births. Methods: The study sample comprised 86 pregnant women with fear of birth and a request for planned cesarean, who were referred for counseling by a psychosocial team at the University Hospital of North Norway in the period 2000–2002. Data were gathered from referral letters, from antenatal and intrapartum care records, and from a follow‐up survey conducted 2 to 4 years after the birth in question. Results: Fear of birth was accompanied by extensive psychosocial problems in most women. Ninety percent had experienced anxiety or depression, 43 percent had eating disturbances, and 63 percent had been subjected to abuse. Twenty‐four percent of those with psychiatric conditions had previously been in treatment. After the intervention, 86 percent changed their original request for cesarean section and were prepared to give birth vaginally. The follow‐up survey confirmed long‐term satisfaction with having changed their request for a cesarean delivery. Of these, 69 percent gave birth vaginally and 31 percent were delivered by cesarean for obstetrical indications. Conclusions: Impending birth activates previous traumatic experiences, abuse, and psychiatric disorders that may give rise to fear of vaginal birth. When women were referred to a specialist service for fear of birth and request for cesarean, they became conscious of, and to some degree worked through, the causes of their fear, and most preferred vaginal birth. They remained pleased with their choice later. (BIRTH 33:3 September 2006)     

改良式剖宫产术132例分析

探讨改良式剖宫产术的临床价值。方法于下胜利部两髂前上棘连线下２－３ｃｍ处做横行直切口,钝性分离脂肪层及腹直肌,横向撕开腹膜,肠线单层连续缝合子宫肌层,不缝合腹膜,肠线连缝合膜及间断全层缝合皮肤及下组织。     

Experiences of Emergency Cesarean Section: A Phenomenological Study of 53 Women

Background: Childbirth by emergency cesarean section can be a traumatic experience, but since the result is often a healthy mother and baby, its seriousness is open to doubt. Method: Fifty-three women were interviewed approximately two days after emergency cesarean section to ascertain whether or not the trauma met the stressor criterion of posttraumatic stress disorder. A time-spatial model from disaster psychiatry was used to chart the women's thoughts and feelings during consecutive phases of the delivery process. The women's causal attributions of the event were also assessed. Results: Generally speaking, the feeling of the women after they had arrived at the delivery ward changed from one of confidence and safety to one of fear. The decision to undertake a cesarean section brought a feeling of relief, but this was again replaced by fear as the operation approached. The women's thoughts centered around the impending delivery and operation until after the event, when the newborn baby occupied their attention and happiness predominated. In retrospect, 55 percent of the women experienced intense fear for their own life or that of their baby. Eight percent felt very badly treated by the delivery staff and were angry. Almost all the women had adequate knowledge of the reasons for the emergency cesarean section. One in four blamed themselves to some extent for the event. Conclusions: The stressor criterion of DSM IV is applicable to the trauma of emergency cesarean section. Even if and when a new mother is happy to meet her baby, negative feelings, such as fear, guilt, or anger, may dominate her memories of the birth. (BIRTH 25:4 December 1998)