Efficacy of a short-term ribavirin plus interferon alpha combination therapy followed by interferon alpha alone in previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C: a randomized multicenter trial

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with interferon alpha (IFNalpha) plus ribavirin has been shown to improve the sustained response rate in patients with chronic hepatitis C but there is little information regarding the lengths of time for this therapeutic regimen. In this study we therefore tried to evaluate whether the analysis of different virological parameters could provide new clues with respect to the early determination of the efficacy of this form of combination therapy. Furthermore, we also examined whether short-term induction combination therapy followed by IFNalpha alone is more effective than monotherapy in mounting an initial as well as a sustained virological response. METHODS: 185 patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C (mean age 42 years (range 19-65 years); 110 males, 75 females) were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive, over the first 12 weeks, either interferon alpha 2a 6 million units (MU) three times weekly plus ribavirin 14 mg/kg per day (n=93) or the same dose of IFNalpha alone (n=92). Patients with a virological response (serum HCV RNA undetectable) after 12 weeks were subsequently treated with 3 MU IFNalpha alone thrice weekly for a further 40 weeks. Otherwise, treatment was discontinued. After the end of treatment, patients were followed up for 24 weeks. RESULTS: Patient characteristics at baseline were not significantly different in the two treatment groups. An initial virological response at week 12 was seen in 61 (66%) patients receiving IFNalpha plus ribavirin and in 44 (48%) being treated with IFNalpha alone (p=0.015) and this improvement in the response rate was mainly restricted to HCV genotype 1-infected patients (58% vs. 38%). In contrast, end-of-treatment (week 52) and sustained virological response rates were similar in both groups (37% vs. 29% and 26% vs. 17% [p=0.1], respectively). Interestingly, patients with HCV genotype 3, however, clearly benefited from short-term combination therapy. Thus, sustained virological response rates in these patients significantly increased from 25% (IFNalpha monotherapy) to 59% (combination therapy) (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Short-term combined therapy for 12 weeks is more effective than the monotherapy with respect to the induction of an initial virological response but this effect applies only to genotype 1-infected patients. However, there is no significant difference between both therapeutic schedules with regard to the induction of sustained response. Although HCV genotype 3-infected patients seem to benefit from this short-term combined therapy, prolonged combined therapy may be necessary in HCV genotype 1-infected patients.     

Efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alpha‐2a therapy for chronic hepatitis C in HIV‐infected patients with haemophilia

Summary. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN) alpha‐2a monotherapy in a cohort of Chinese haemophilic patients co‐infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/hepatitis C virus (HCV) and undergoing highly active antiretroviral drugs therapy. Twenty‐two (n = 22) patients with CD4 lymphocyte counts over 200 cells μL^?1 were treated with 180 μg of PEG‐IFN alpha‐2a subcutaneously once in a week for 48 weeks. HCV load (HCV RNA), HIV load (HIV RNA) and CD4 lymphocyte counts were measured at baseline and 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 weeks after initiation of anti‐HCV therapy. Efficacy and safety were analysed according to baseline CD4 status (≥350 cells μL^?1). Significant HCV‐RNA decreases (>1 log₁₀ copies mL^?1) were observed through week 72 after PEG‐INF alpha‐2a monotherapy across both CD4 strata. CD4 status was not associated with treatment outcomes as evaluated using rapid viral response rate (P = 0.655), early viral response rate (P = 0.387), end‐of‐treatment viral response rate (P = 1.000) or sustained viral response rate (SVR, P = 0.674). A sustained virological response was achieved in nine patients (41%), five with genotype 2a (83%) and four with genotype 1b (25%, P = 0.023). SVR was HCV genotype dependent. Eleven patients required a dose reduction in PEG‐IFN alpha‐2a. PEG‐IFN alpha‐2a monotherapy could be considered as a safe and effective option for the treatment of HCV infection in HIV patients with haemophilia, particularly in resource‐limited settings. While higher CD4 lymphocyte counts resulted in greater HCV‐RNA reduction, HCV genotype was a predictor for sustained virological response.     

A multicenter survey of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C in Japan

Aim: This study aimed to clarify the factors associated the efficacy of re‐treatment with pegylated interferon (PEG IFN) plus ribavirin combination therapy for patients with chronic hepatitis C who had failed to respond to previous treatment. Methods: One hundred and forty‐three patients who had previously shown relapse (n = 79), non‐response (n = 34) or intolerance (n = 30) to PEG IFN plus ribavirin were re‐treated with PEG IFN plus ribavirin. Results: Twenty‐five patients with intolerance to previous treatment completed re‐treatment and the sustained virological response (SVR) rates were 55% and 80% for hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 and 2, respectively. On re‐treatment of the 113 patients who completed the previous treatment, the SVR rates were 48% and 63% for genotype 1 and 2, respectively. Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level on re‐treatment were associated with SVR in genotype 1 (P < 0.001). Patients with the interleukin‐28B major genotype responded significantly better and earlier to re‐treatment, but the difference in the SVR rate did not reach a significant level between the major and minor genotypes (P = 0.09). Extended treatment of 72 weeks raised the SVR rate among the patients who attained complete early virological response but not rapid virological response with re‐treatment (72 weeks, 73%, 16/22, vs 48 weeks, 38%, 5/13, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Relapse after previous treatment and a low baseline HCV RNA level have predictive values for a favorable response of PEG IFN plus ribavirin re‐treatment for HCV genotype 1 patients. Re‐treatment for 72 weeks may lead to clinical improvement for genotype 1 patients with complete early virological response and without rapid virological response on re‐treatment.     

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

Aims: We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high‐dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV‐RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high‐dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b. Methods: Twenty‐two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN‐beta for four weeks and then IFN‐alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV‐RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients). Conclusion: Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN‐retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.     

Peginterferon alpha-2a (40 KD) plus ribavirin for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in Japanese patients

Background: The efficacy and safety of peginterferon alpha‐2a (40 KD) (peg‐IFNα‐2a) plus ribavirin has not been reported for Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to evaluate this combination in treatment‐naïve patients and in non‐responders or relapsers to interferon monotherapy. Methods: Overall, 201 treatment‐naïve patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype‐1b were randomly assigned to 180 µg peg‐IFNα‐2a once‐weekly plus ribavirin 600–1000 mg/day or peg‐IFNα‐2a plus placebo for 48 weeks. Additionally, peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin was administered for 48 weeks to 100 non‐responders or relapsers (85% genotype‐1) to previous interferon monotherapy. Results: A sustained virological response (SVR) was attained among significantly more treatment‐naïve patients receiving combination therapy than monotherapy (61% vs 26%, P < 0.001). For patients with high baseline HCV RNA, the SVR rate was 59% with peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin versus 24% with peg‐IFNα‐2a monotherapy. Among non‐responders or relapsers to previous interferon monotherapy, 54% attained an SVR. Adverse events were generally mild, and discontinuations rates due to adverse events or laboratory abnormalities were low. Conclusion: In Japanese patients, peg‐IFNα‐2a plus ribavirin provided significant improvement in SVR rates compared with peg‐IFNα‐2a alone in treatment‐naïve patients, and was effective as re‐treatment for non‐responders or relapsers to previous treatment with interferon monotherapy.     

Effect of combined interferon-alpha induction therapy and ribavirin on chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a randomized multicentre study

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of interferon-alpha (IFN) induction in combination with ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not known. METHODS: A total of 256 treatment-naive HCV RNA-positive patients with biopsy-confirmed chronic hepatitis were enrolled in a randomized multicentre study. The patients received either standard combination therapy with 3 MIU interferon-alpha2b thrice weekly for 26 weeks or 6 MIU interferon-alpha2b daily for 4 weeks and 3 MIU 3/7 days for 22 weeks. All patients received ribavirin 1000 mg or 1200 mg (weight dependent) daily during the 26-week treatment period. Patients were monitored for HCV RNA during and following treatment. RESULTS: The sustained virological response rates (26 weeks after end of treatment) were 54% and 47% for patients receiving IFN induction/ribavirin and standard IFN/ribavirin, respectively (P = 0.35). Among patients infected with genotype 1a/1b, the sustained response rates were 32% and 35%. In patients infected with genotype 2b/3a IFN induction/ribavirin led to a sustained response rate of 80% as compared to 65% in the standard combination therapy group (P = 0.073). Steatosis was more frequently seen in liver biopsies from patients infected with genotype 3a as compared to genotypes la/lb. Among genotype 1a/1b infected patients. steatosis was a highly significant predictor of failure to achieve sustained virological response. Logistic regression analysis (multivariate analysis) showed that independent predictors of sustained virological response were low age, female gender, genotype 2b/3a and HCV RNA negativity at 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: IFN induction in combination with ribavirin does not increase the sustained virological response rate among patients infected with HCV. Absence of steatosis is an independent predictor of sustained virological response in patients infected with genotypes 1a/1b.     

Prospective study of short-term peginterferon-alpha-2a monotherapy in patients who had a virological response at 2 weeks after initiation of interferon therapy

Background and Aims: Long‐term interferon (IFN) therapy is effective in eliminating hepatitis C virus (HCV). However, it carries the risk of adverse effects and reduced quality of life. To assess whether short‐term IFN therapy effectively eliminates HCV, we performed a prospective pilot study of pegylated (peg)IFN‐α‐2a therapy for 8 or 24 weeks. Methods: After excluding patients with high titers of genotype‐1, 55 HCV patients received pegIFN‐α‐2a. Patients who became negative for HCV‐RNA at week 2 were allocated to either an 8‐week (n = 19) or 24‐week (n = 15) course of IFN. We evaluated the efficacy of and tolerance to IFN therapy. Results: The sustained virological response rate was excellent in the two groups (8 weeks, 89.5% [17/19]; 24 weeks, 100% [15/15], respectively,). IFN dose reduction was required in one patient of the 8‐week group, but in six patients of the 24‐week group (P = 0.028). Treatment was completed by all patients of the 8‐week group, but discontinued in five patients of the 24‐week group (P = 0.011). Conclusions: The 8‐week IFN therapy is more tolerable than the 24‐week therapy and had similar outcomes. Excluding the patients with high titers of genotype‐1, we recommend switching to an 8‐week course of pegIFN‐α monotherapy once patients show an ultra rapid virological response at week 2 from the start of IFN therapy.     

Enhanced efficacy of pegylated interferon alpha‐2a over pegylated interferon and ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C genotype 4A randomized trial and quality of life analysis

Aim: The therapy of chronic hepatitis C genotype 4 (HCV‐4) has not been optimized yet. This randomized, prospective, parallel‐group clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon α‐2a (PEG‐IFN α‐2a) plus ribavirin and PEG‐IFN α‐2b plus ribavirin and assessed the health‐related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with chronic HCV‐4. Methods: Eligible patients with proven chronic HCV‐4 were randomized to receive either a weekly dose of PEG‐IFN α‐2a (180 μg) or PEG‐IFN α‐2b (1.5 μg/kg) and a daily dose of ribavirin (1000–1200 mg) for 48 weeks with 24 weeks post‐treatment follow‐up. The primary end point was sustained virological response (SVR) defined by undetectable HCV RNA 24 weeks after treatment. The Short form‐36 Health Survey version 2 (SF‐36v2) and the Chronic Liver Disease questionnaires (CLDQ) were assessed before, during and after therapy. Results: The overall SVR rate of the entire cohort was 59.9%. The SVR rates were significantly higher in patients treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2a and ribavirin (Group A; n=109) compared with those treated with PEG‐IFN α‐2b and ribavirin (Group B; n=108, 70.6 vs. 54.6%, respectively; P=0.017). The relapse rates were 5.1% for PEG‐IFN α‐2a and 15.7% for PEG‐IFN α‐2b (P=0.0019). The SF‐36v2 and CLDQ were low during therapy and improved significantly after therapy successful therapy. Conclusion: Pegylated interferon α‐2a plus ribavirin was significantly more effective than PEG‐IFN α‐2b and ribavirin therapy in the treatment of chronic HCV‐4 patients. The tolerability and adverse events were comparable between the two regimens. The HRQOL improved significantly after successful PEG‐IFN α‐2a plus ribavirin therapy.     

Effect of Combined Interferon-α Induction Therapy and Ribavirin on Chronic Hepatitis C Virus Infection: a Randomized Multicentre Study

Background: The efficacy of interferon- α (IFN) induction in combination with ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is not known. Methods: A total of 256 treatment-naive HCV RNA-positive patients with biopsy-confirmed chronic hepatitis were enrolled in a randomized multicentre study. The patients received either standard combination therapy with 3 MIU interferon- α 2b thrice weekly for 26 weeks or 6 MIU interferon- α 2b daily for 4 weeks and 3 MIU 3/7 days for 22 weeks. All patients received ribavirin 1000 mg or 1200 mg (weight dependent) daily during the 26-week treatment period. Patients were monitored for HCV RNA during and following treatment. Results: The sustained virological response rates (26 weeks after end of treatment) were 54% and 47% for patients receiving IFN induction/ribavirin and standard IFN/ribavirin, respectively ( P = 0.35). Among patients infected with genotype 1a/1b, the sustained response rates were 32% and 35%. In patients infected with genotype 2b/3a IFN induction/ribavirin led to a sustained response rate of 80% as compared to 65% in the standard combination therapy group ( P = 0.073). Steatosis was more frequently seen in liver biopsies from patients infected with genotype 3a as compared to genotypes 1a/1b. Among genotype 1a/1b infected patients, steatosis was a highly significant predictor of failure to achieve sustained virological response. Logistic regression analysis (multivariate analysis) showed that independent predictors of sustained virological response were low age, female gender, genotype 2b/3a and HCV RNA negativity at 2 weeks. Conclusions: IFN induction in combination with ribavirin does not increase the sustained virological response rate among patients infected with HCV. Absence of steatosis is an independent predictor of sustained virological response in patients infected with genotypes 1a/1b.     

Daily or three times per week interferon α-2b in combination with ribavirin or interferon alone for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C not responding to previous interferon alone

Background/Aims: We compared the efficacy and safety of the combined therapy of daily interferon α-2b and ribavirin with those of interferon α-2b three times per week alone or in combination with ribavirin in non-responder patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.Methods: A total of 376 patients were randomly assigned to receive interferon α-2b (6 MU three times per week for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) alone (group A) or in combination with ribavirin for 48 weeks (group B), or daily interferon α-2b (3 MU per day for 24 weeks followed by 3 MU three times per week for 24 weeks) and ribavirin (group C).Results: After 24 weeks of therapy, HCV RNA was undetectable in 11.7, 24.0, and 37.8% for groups A, B, and C, respectively. Sustained virological response was more frequent in patients who received combination therapy with three times weekly interferon (20.9%) or daily interferon (26.0%) than in patients who received interferon alone (5.8%) (P<0.001). The predictive HCV parameters for sustained response were a low viral load on day 7 and a negative HCV RNA on week 12.Conclusions: In conclusion, in non-responder patients with chronic hepatitis C, virological response with daily interferon and ribavirin, compared to interferon monotherapy, was significantly improved during treatment, although sustained virological response was similar for both combination therapies with ribavirin and three times a week or daily interferon.     

Factors affecting efficacy in patients with genotype 2 chronic hepatitis C treated by pegylated interferon alpha‐2b and ribavirin: reducing drug doses has no impact on rapid and sustained virological responses

Summary. Reducing the dose of drug affects treatment efficacy in pegylated interferon (Peg‐IFN) and ribavirin combination therapy for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of drug exposure, as well as the baseline factors and the virological response on the treatment efficacy for genotype 2 patients. Two‐hundred and fifty patients with genotype 2 HCV who were to undergo combination therapy for 24 weeks were included in the study, and 213 completed the treatment. Significantly more patients who achieved a rapid virological response (RVR), defined as HCV RNA negativity at week 4, achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) (92%, 122/133) compared with patients who failed to achieve RVR (48%, 38/80) (P < 0.0001). Multivariate logistic‐regression analysis showed that only platelet counts [odds ratio (OR), 1.68; confidence interval (CI), 1.002–1.139] and RVR (OR, 11.251; CI, 5.184–24.419) were independently associated with SVR, with no correlation being found for the mean dose of Peg‐IFN and ribavirin for RVR and SVR. Furthermore, in the stratification analysis of the timing of viral clearance, neither mean dose of Peg‐IFN (P = 0.795) nor ribavirin (P = 0.649) affected SVR in each group. Among the patients with RVR, the lowest dose group of Peg‐IFN (0.77 ± 0.10 μg/kg/week) and ribavirin (6.9 ± 0.90 mg/kg/day) showed 100% and 94% of SVR. Hence, RVR served as an important treatment predictor, and drug exposure had no impact on both SVR and RVR in combination therapy for genotype 2 patients.     

Firstline treatment for hepatitis C: combination interferon/ribavirin versus interferon monotherapy

In the initial treatment of chronic hepatitis C, interferon‐alfa (IFN‐α) monotherapy for 24–48 weeks induces sustained response rates of only 10–20%. Combination therapy with IFN‐α plus ribavirin induces a sustained response in 40–50% of patients, and can be now recommended as the firstline therapy for chronic hepatitis C. Stopping therapy at week 12 because of persistent viraemia is unnecessary with the combination therapy because later clearance of HCV RNA can still occur with a sustained response. Patients with HCV genotype 1 should receive 48 weeks of combination therapy, in contrast to 24 weeks for patients with genotypes 2 or 3. For patients who cannot tolerate the side effects of ribavirin, such as anaemia, IFN‐α at 3 MU three times weekly for 48 weeks is preferred as the initial therapy. The long‐acting pegylated IFN can be expected to enhance the efficacy of combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C and appears to be much more potent as monotherapy. Further studies are needed to improve the current ‘half‐full’ status of chronic hepatitis C treatment.     

Impact of ribavirin priming on viral kinetics and treatment response in chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection

Ribavirin amplifies the interferon‐alpha (IFN) signalling cascade. As ribavirin needs 4 weeks to reach steady state, ribavirin priming may optimize hepatic IFN sensitivity before starting a pegylated (PEG)‐IFN/ribavirin combination therapy. This study investigated potential benefits of ribavirin priming prior to PEG‐IFN2a/ribavirin combination therapy on viral kinetics, on‐treatment and sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 infection. Sixty‐eight treatment naive patients were randomized 2:2:1 to ribavirin (ribavirin arm) or placebo (placebo arm) or PEG‐IFN2a (PEG‐IFN2a arm) for 6 weeks prior to 12 weeks of PEG‐IFN2a/ribavirin combination therapy within a double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Then, standard PEG‐IFN2a/ribavirin combination therapy according to the German guidelines was continued under the responsibility of the investigators. Ribavirin was given according to body weight and PEG‐IFN2a at a dose of 180 μg subcutaneously once/week. During ribavirin priming, HCV RNA showed a decline of −0.58 log₁₀ IU/mL (P < 0.001) that was unrelated to the IL28B rs12979860 genotype (CC vs CT/TT, P = 0.244). Ribavirin priming did neither increase the PEG‐IFN2a‐induced first‐ or second‐phase viral decline (P values >0.100) nor on‐treatment response or SVR (HCV RNA undetectable at week 12 of combination therapy: ribavirin arm 56%, placebo arm 38%, PEG‐IFN2a arm 50%; SVR: ribavirin arm 41%, placebo arm 54%, PEG‐IFN2a arm 50%; P values >0.300). In conclusion, ribavirin monotherapy showed a significant antiviral activity that was not influenced by the IL28B genotype. Ribavirin priming prior to PEG‐IFN2a/ribavirin combination therapy did neither increase the first‐ or second‐phase viral decline nor on‐treatment response or SVR.     

Monitoring virological responses to interferon-ribavirin and interferon monotherapy of chronic hepatitis C re-treated due to relapse or non-response

Adding the nucleoside analog ribavirin (RBV) to interferon (IFN) for treatment of HCV has improved the sustained response rates, but the mechanism by which RBV mediates viral clearance is not fully understood. In this study, a highly sensitive method (Codes Amplicor HCV Monitor) was used to monitor the early (first 12 weeks of therapy) and long-term virological response in 20 patients who were treated first with IFN and later, due to non-sustained response, with IFN-RBV. All 10 IFN relapsers displayed a prompt virological response at week 4 to both IFN and IFN-RBV therapy; nine of them showed a sustained response to IFN-RBV. Out of 10 IFN non-responders, five showed a sustained response to IFN-RBV. Four of these were HCV RNA-negative at week 4 of IFN-RBV therapy and two of them had a transient early virological response (RNA-negative at weeks 4-8) to IFN alone. Overall, of the 14 patients (nine IFN relapsers, five IFN non-responders) with a sustained response to IFN-RBV, 11 and 13 had HCV RNA below 2000 copies/ml at week 4 of IFN and IFN-RBV, respectively, as compared with one and one of six patients without a sustained response to IFN-RBV (p < 0.02). Thus, addition of RBV to IFN increased both viral clearance during the first 12 weeks of therapy and the rate of sustained response. Loss of viremia at week 4 of IFN was associated with a sustained response to IFN-RBV and was seen in 11 of 13 patients (85%) with genotypes 2 or 3, as compared with one of seven patients (14%) with genotype 1 (p = 0.0044).     

An open-label randomized controlled study of pegylated interferon/ribavirin combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C with versus without fluvastatin

Summary. Pegylated interferon (PEG‐IFN)/ribavirin combination therapy is the standard‐of‐care (SOC) treatment for chronic hepatitis C patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b and high viral load. The addition of fluvastatin to SOC treatment has been suggested to be effective for better outcome in retrospective pilot analyses. We investigated whether the combination of fluvastatin with PEG‐IFN/ribavirin could actually improve sustained viral response (SVR) in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. A randomized, open‐labeled, controlled study was conducted between July 2008 and December 2009 in 101 chronic hepatitis C patients allocated to PEG‐IFN/ribavirin combination therapy with or without fluvastatin. SVR rates were calculated in groups, stratifying host and viral factors. We also analyzed predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate regression analysis. Rapid and early virological, and end of treatment response rates in the fluvastatin group were not significantly different from those in the non‐fluvastatin group. Notwithstanding, SVR rate was significantly higher in the fluvastatin group than in the non‐fluvastatin group (63.0%vs 41.7%, P = 0.0422). Comparison of the two groups stratifying demographic data and HCV characteristics showed significantly higher SVR rates to more than 80% in males, more than two mutations in the interferon sensitivity determining region (ISDR), and a history of relapse among the fluvastatin group than the non‐fluvastatin group. Being male and major genotype IL28B single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were independent predictive factors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin with multivariate analysis. Fluvastatin‐combined with PEG‐IFN/ribavirin therapy significantly improves SVR rates in patients with HCV genotype 1b and high viral load. Male and major genotype IL28B SNPs were independent predictors for SVR among patients on fluvastatin combination therapy.     

Reinforced interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin is more effective than standard combination therapy in the retreatment of chronic hepatitis C previously nonresponsive to interferon: a randomized trial

Interferon-alpha (IFN) monotherapy results in sustained virological clearance in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis C. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of a reinforced regimen combining ribavirin and high-dose IFN for 48 weeks compared with a nonreinforced regimen combining a standard IFN regimen and ribavirin for 24 weeks in nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C. A total of 231 patients with chronic hepatitis C and previous nonresponse to IFN monotherapy were randomized. The reinforced group (n = 114) received IFN-2b 6 million units (MU) thrice weekly (TIW) and ribavirin for 48 weeks, and the nonreinforced group (n = 117) received IFN-2b 3 MU TIW and ribavirin for 24 weeks. The main outcome measure was a sustained virological response, defined as negative serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA 24 weeks following the end of treatment. This endpoint was determined in 98 patients of the reinforced group and 105 patients of the nonreinforced group. At the end of follow-up, a sustained virological response was observed in 29 of the 98 patients (29.6%) in the reinforced group vs 16 of the 105 patients (15.2%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.014). In multivariate analysis, factors associated with a sustained virological response were treated with a reinforced regimen [odds ratio (OR) 2.9; P = 0.06] and genotype 2 or 3 (OR 8.8; P < 0.0002). A total of 160 patients had paired biopsies before and after treatment. Histological activity improvement was observed in 32 of 80 patients (40%) and fibrosis worsening in 26 of 80 patients (33%) in the reinforced group vs 13 of 80 (16%) and 19 of 80 (24%) in the nonreinforced group (P = 0.30 and 0.20, respectively). Hence in nonresponders, a high-dose 48-week regimen of IFN and ribavirin combination was more effective than a regimen with interferon at lower dose and ribavirin for 24 weeks only.     

Evaluation of long-term efficacy of interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin in combination in naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: an Italian multicenter experience. Ribavirin-Interferon in Chronic Hepatitis Italian Group Investigators

BACKGROUND/AIMS: A combination of interferon alpha and ribavirin has been suggested to reach a higher rate of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C than monotherapy. In this study we assessed the long-term efficacy of this combination therapy in the treatment of selected Italian naive chronic hepatitis C patients compared to interferon alpha monotherapy. METHODS: We enrolled 428 naive patients who were randomly assigned to receive either recombinant interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin for 24 weeks or interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks. The primary end-point of the study was the rate of sustained virological response. Serum HCV RNA levels were determined before treatment; during treatment at weeks 12 and 24 in the patients receiving the combination therapy; at weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 in the patients receiving monotherapy; and after therapy at weeks 12, 24 and 48 in the patients in both study groups. RESULTS: Sustained virological response was observed in 43% of the patients treated with combination therapy and in 14% of the patients treated with monotherapy. Logistic regression analysis showed that sustained response was associated with the combination therapy, with HCV genotype other than 1b, with an HCV viral load of 3x10(6) copies/ml or less, with an inflammation score of 7 or less, and with an estimated duration of disease of 10 years or less. CONCLUSIONS: A 24-week treatment course with interferon alpha-2b and ribavirin offers a greater chance of sustained virological response compared to treatment with interferon alpha-2b alone for 48 weeks, and may be indicated as initial therapy in such patients.     

Mutations in the NS5A and E2‐PePHD regions of hepatitis C virus genotype 1b and response to combination therapy of interferon plus ribavirin

Background/aims: Combination therapy with interferon (IFN) and ribavirin is the current standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, but the efficacy is still not satisfactory, especially for genotype 1b. NS5A and E2 proteins of hepatitis C virus (HCV) may repress the IFN‐induced RNA‐dependent protein kinase (PKR), and thus have the potential to influence the response of HCV to IFN therapy; however, this issue remains controversial. Methods: Nucleotide sequences of the PKR‐eIF2α phosphorylation homology domain (E2‐PePHD) and PKR‐binding domain (NS5A‐PKR bd) of the HCV genome were analyzed by amplification and direct sequencing in 30 HCV genotype 1b patients who had been treated with IFN and ribavirin. Results: Nine (30%) patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR) to combination therapy. Pretreatment variables and amino acid substitutions were compared between responders and non‐responders. The responders were younger than non‐responders (37.2±10.4 vs. 45.4±9.5 years, P=0.017), whereas no significant statistical differences were found in the number of amino acid substitutions in NS5A and E2‐PePHD regions between the two groups. Conclusions: Genetic heterogeneity in NS5A and E2‐PePHD regions of the HCV genome may not serve as a predictor for treatment outcome with combination therapy in Taiwanese patients with chronic HCV genotype 1b infection.     

Mutagenic effects of ribavirin and response to interferon/ribavirin combination therapy in chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To elucidate whether ribavirin acts as a mutagen in the clinical setting and to clarify the relationship between ribavirin-induced mutations and virological response to combined therapy. METHODS: Thirty-four patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1b received ribavirin monotherapy for 4 weeks, followed by a 24-week course of IFN/ribavirin therapy. HCV mutations during a non-treatment observation period and during subsequent ribavirin monotherapy were determined, and the relationship between mutations and response to subsequent IFN/ribavirin therapy was evaluated. RESULTS: Serum HCV significantly decreased from 6.90 to 6.56 log10copy/ml in response to ribavirin monotherapy (P < 0.0001). Nucleotide mutations in the NS5A and NS5B regions occurred during ribavirin monotherapy at a rate of 2.9 x 10(-2)/site/year and 1.3 x 10(-2)/site/year, respectively, a significantly higher rate than the mutation rates during the prior non-treatment observation period (0.60 x 10(-2)/site/year and 0.24 x 10(-2)/site/year, P = 0.02, respectively). Mutation rates in the NS5A region were significantly higher in sustained viral responders (SVRs, n = 10) than in non-responders (8.8 x 10(-2)/site/year vs. 0.38 x 10(-2)/site/year, P = 0.0005, respectively). In the NS5A region, non-synonymous mutations only occurred in SVRs. CONCLUSIONS: Ribavirin may act as a mutagen, and mutations occurring during ribavirin therapy correlate with the virological response to subsequent IFN/ribavirin combination therapy.     

A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of interferon alpha in combination with ribavirin in the treatment of interferon alpha nonresponders with chronic hepatitis C: superior efficacy of high daily dosage of interferon alpha in genotype 1

Summary. A randomized trial was conducted to assess the efficacy of daily (QD) or thrice weekly (TIW) administration of interferon- α (IFN) in high doses in combination with ribavirin (1.0–1.2 g/day) in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) who were nonresponders to previous IFN monotherapy. Interferon was administered as 10 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 4 weeks, followed by 5 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 20 weeks, and then by 3 MU IFN (QD or TIW) for 24 weeks. Sustained virological response (SVR) was evaluated in 142 patients who received at least one dose of medication. One-fourth of the patients achieved SVR, 26% of those treated with IFN QD and 25% of those treated with IFN TIW ( P  = 0.85). For genotype 1 patients, SVR rates were 32.4 and 15.8% for IFN QD and IFN TIW, respectively, whereas for genotype non-1 patients the corresponding SVR rates were 20.6 and 36.4%, respectively (test of homogeneity: P  = 0.031). This finding was further confirmed by multivariate logistic regression analysis where a statistically significant interaction ( P  = 0.012) was found between treatment and HCV genotype indicating that the IFN QD regimen was superior to IFN TIW among genotype 1 patients whereas, among genotype non-1 patients, the two treatments were similar (odds ratio of SVR in IFN QD vs IFN TIW: 3.33 among genotype 1 patients, 95% CI: 1.00–11.14). In conclusion, re-treatment of patients not responding to previous IFN monotherapy with a combination of high daily dose of IFN with ribavirin may be beneficial for genotype 1 infected patients.