The perineorectal reflex The perineorectal reflex in health and obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: Many females with obstructed defecation apply digital pressure on their perineum to facilitate defecation. This study investigated the impact of this maneuver on rectal tone. METHODS: Forty-five female patients with obstructed defecation were studied. Thirty-four patients (76 percent) regularly applied digital pressure on their perineum to facilitate defecation. Total colonic transit time was normal in 32 patients and prolonged in 13 patients. For comparison, 17 female controls were studied. With the subject in the left lateral position, a thin, infinitely compliant polyethylene bag was inserted into the rectum at 10 cm from the anal canal. Rectal tone was assessed by measuring variations in bag volume with a computer-controlled electromechanical air injection system. After an adaptation period of 15 minutes, digital pressure was applied to the anterior perineum by one of the authors (WRS). In a second recording session, the tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate was examined. RESULTS: During the application of perineal pressure, all controls showed an increase in rectal tone (mean value, 52.8 ± 19 percent). In the whole patient group, this response was significantly lower (mean value, 24.2 ± 19 percent; P < 0.001). Eight of these patients (18 percent) showed no response at all. None of them applied perineal pressure. In the remaining 37 patients (72 percent), the perineorectal reflex was present but was significantly lower (mean value, 29.8 ± 17 percent; P < 0.001). Thirty-four of these females (92 percent) stated that they applied perineal pressure on a regular basis to facilitate their defecation. All controls showed an increase in rectal tone during an evoked urge to defecate (mean value, 37.8 ± 8 percent). In the patients, this response was significantly lower (16.7 ± 6 percent). Eight of these patients showed no increase in rectal tone at all. These patients were the same patients in whom the perineorectal reflex was absent. Regarding the tonic response of the rectum to perineal pressure, no difference was found between patients with a normal colonic transit time and those with a prolonged colonic transit time. CONCLUSION: Digital pressure applied on the perineum results in an increase in rectal tone. This perineorectal reflex is present, although significantly lower, in the majority of females with obstructed defecation. This observation might explain why females with obstructed defecation frequently apply perineal pressure to facilitate defecation.     

Rectal tone in response to bisacodyl in women with obstructed defecation

This study investigated the tonic response of the rectum to topical application of bisacodyl in women with obstructed defecation. Forty-five women with obstructed defecation, and 15 female controls were studied. Total colonic transit time was normal in 35 patients, and prolonged in 10. For the purpose of this study an "infinitely compliant" polyethylene bag was inserted into the rectum. Rectal tone was assessed by measuring variations in bag volume with a computerized electromechanical "barostat" system. After an adaptation period of 30 min, a suppository containing 10 mg bisacodyl was inserted into the rectum. Recording was continued for 90 min. In a second recording session rectal tone in response to an evoked urge to defecate was assessed. In a third session we investigated rectal sensory perception. After a mean time interval of 30 +/- 15 min following intrarectal application of bisacodyl, all controls showed a significant increase in rectal tone (mean value: 68.2 +/- 12%). In patients with a normal transit time, a similar increase was observed. In patients with prolonged transit time, the tonic response of the rectum to bisacodyl was significantly lower (mean 21.1 +/- 11%; P < 0.001). Five of these patients showed no response at all. In the second recording session, all controls showed an increase in rectal tone during an evoked urge to defecate (mean 36.3 +/- 7%). In both patient groups this tonic response was absent or significantly blunted (mean 19.2 +/- 6%) (P < 0.001). In both patient groups rectal sensory perception was impaired significantly. In conclusion, rectal tone increases significantly after topical application of bisacodyl in controls as well as in patients with obstructed defecation in whom transit time is normal. This tonic response is absent or significantly blunted in patients with a prolonged transit time. Both the tonic response of the rectum to an evoked urge to defecate and rectal sensory perception are significantly impaired in patients with a normal and those with a prolonged transit time.     

Rectal compliance in females with obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: This study was designed to investigate whether rectal compliance is altered in females with obstructed defecation. METHODS: Eighty female patients with obstructed defecation and 60 control subjects were studied. Rectal compliance was measured with an infinitely compliant polyethylene bag. This bag was inserted in the rectum and inflated with air to selected pressure plateaus (range, 0–60 mmHg; cumulative steps of 2 mmHg with a duration of ten seconds) using a computer-controlled electromechanical barostat system. Volume changes at the levels of distending pressures were recorded. The distending pressures, needed to evoke first sensation of content in the rectum, earliest urge to defecate, and the maximum tolerable volume were noted. RESULTS: In all cases, the compliance curve had a characteristic triphasic (S-shaped) form. The mean compliance curve obtained from the patients was identical to that of the controls. However, the course of the compliance curve fell above the normal range (mean + 2 SD) in 14 patients. In ten (71 percent) of these patients, a large rectocele was seen at evacuation proctography. Such a rectocele was observed in only five patients (7.6 percent) with a normal compliance curve (P<0.001). Eighty percent of the controls experienced earliest urge to defecate during the second phase of the curve. In 75 percent of the patients, this occurred in the third phase. The mean pressure threshold for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were significantly higher in patients compared with control subjects. Ten of the patients experienced no sensation at all in the pressure range between 0 and 60 mmHg. CONCLUSION: In females with obstructed defection, the compliance of the rectal wall is normal.     

The influence of age on posterior pelvic floor dysfunction in women with obstructed defecation syndrome

Background

Knowledge of risk factors is particularly useful to prevent or manage pelvic floor dysfunction but although a number of such factors have been proposed, results remain inconsistent. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of aging on the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defecation syndrome evaluated using echodefecography.

Methods

A total of 334 patients with obstructed defecation were evaluated using echodefecography in order to quantify posterior pelvic floor dysfunction (rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse, paradoxical contraction or non-relaxation of the puborectalis muscle, and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele). Patients were grouped according to the age (Group I?=?patients up to 50?years of age; Group II?=?patients over 50?years of age) to evaluate the isolated and associated incidence of dysfunctions. To evaluate the relationship between dysfunction and age-related changes, patients were also stratified into decades.

Results

Group I included 196 patients and Group II included 138. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, rectocele associated with intussusception, rectocele associated with mucosal prolapse and 3 associated disorders was higher in Group II, whereas anismus was more prevalent in Group I. The incidence of significant rectocele, intussusception, mucosal prolapse and grade III enterocele/sigmoidocele was found to increase with age. Conversely, anismus decreased with age.

Conclusions

Aging was shown to influence the incidence of posterior pelvic floor disorders (rectocele, intussusception, mucosa prolapse and enterocele/sigmoidocele), but not the incidence of anismus, in women with obstructed defecation syndrome.     

Management of obstructed defecation

The management of obstructed defecation syndrome(ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an "iceberg syndrome", with "emerging rocks", rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has "underwater rocks" or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectoceleand/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone’s enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.     

Rectal sensory perception in females with obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: Parasympathetic afferent nerves are thought to mediate rectal filling sensations. The role of sympathetic afferent nerves in the mediation of these sensations is unclear. Sympathetic nerves have been reported to mediate nonspecific sensations in the pelvis or lower abdomen in patients with blocked parasympathetic afferent supply. It has been reported that the parasympathetic afferent nerves are stimulated by both slow ramp (cumulative) and fast phasic (intermittent) distention of the rectum, whereas the sympathetic afferent nerves are only stimulated by fast phasic distention. Therefore, it might be useful to use the two distention protocols to differentiate between a parasympathetic and sympathetic afferent deficit. METHODS: Sixty control subjects (9 males; median age, 48 (range, 20–70) years) and 100 female patients (median age, 50 (range, 18–75) years) with obstructed defecation entered the study. Rectal sensory perception was assessed with an infinitely compliant polyethylene bag and a computer-controlled air-injection system. This bag was inserted into the rectum and inflated with air to selected pressure levels according to two different distention protocols (fast phasic and slow ramp). The distending pressures needed to evoke rectal filling sensations, first sensation of content in the rectum, and earliest urge to defecate were noted, as was the maximum tolerable volume. RESULTS: In all control subjects, rectal filling sensations could be evoked. Twenty-one patients (21 percent) experienced no sensation at all in the pressure range between 0 and 65 mmHg during either slow ramp or fast phasic distention. The pressure thresholds for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were significantly higher in patients with obstructed defecation (P<0.001). In each subject, the pressure thresholds for first sensation, earliest urge to defecate, and maximum tolerable volume were always the same, regardless of the type of distention. CONCLUSION: Rectal sensory perception is blunted or absent in the majority of patients with obstructed defecation. The observation that this abnormality can be detected by both distention protocols suggests that the parasympathetic afferent nerves are deficient. Because none of the patients experienced a nonspecific sensation in the pelvis or lower abdomen during fast phasic distention, it might be suggested that the sympathetic afferents are also deficient. This finding implies that it is not worthwhile to use different distention protocols in patients with obstructed defecation.     

An unusual cause of obstructed defecation

Obstructed defecation is one subtype of constipation, and may be due to functional or mechanical causes. Here, we report an unusual cause, never described before, of obstructed defecation due to a large uterine myoma that reverted to normal bowel habits after surgery. The importance of an accurate evaluation of the causes of constipation is highlighted, to recognize potential curable factors.     

The clinical value of magnetic resonance defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome

Background

The aim of the present study was to assess the relationship between symptoms of obstructed defecation and findings on magnetic resonance (MR) defecography in males with obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS).

Methods

Thirty-six males with ODS who underwent MR defecography at our institution between March 2013 and February 2016 were asked in a telephone interview about their symptoms and subsequent treatment, either medical or surgical. Patients were divided into 2 groups, one with anismus (Group 1) and one with prolapse without anismus (Group 2). The interaction between ODS type and symptoms with MR findings was assessed by multivariate analysis for categorical data using a hierarchical log-linear model. MR imaging findings included lateral and/or posterior rectocele, rectal prolapse, intussusception, ballooning of levator hiatus with impingement of pelvic organs and dyskinetic puborectalis muscle.

Results

There were 21 males with ODS due to anismus (Group 1) and 15 with ODS due to rectal prolapse/intussusception (Group 2). Mean age of the entire group was 53.6 ± 4.1 years (range 18–77 years). Patients in Group 1 were slightly older than those in Group 2 (age peak, sixth decade in 47.6 vs 20.0%, p < 0.05). Symptoms most frequently associated with Group 1 patients included small volume and hard feces (85.0%, p < 0.01), excessive strain at stool (81.0%, p < 0.05), tenesmus and fecaloma formation (57.1 and 42.9%, p < 0.05); symptoms most frequently associated with Group 2 patients included mucous discharge, rectal bleeding and pain (86.7%, p < 0.05), prolonged toilet time (73.3%, p < 0.05), fragmented evacuation with or without digitation (66.7%, p < 0.005). Voiding outflow obstruction was more frequent in Group 1 (19.0 vs 13.3%; p < 0.05), while non-bacterial prostatitis and sexual dysfunction prevailed in Group 2 (26.7 and 46.7%, p < 0.05). At MR defecography, two major categories of findings were detected: a dyskinetic pattern (Type 1), seen in all Group 1 patients, which was characterized by non-relaxing puborectalis muscle, sand-glass configuration of the anorectum, poor emptying rate, limited pelvic floor descent and final residue ≥ 2/3; and a prolapsing pattern (Type 2), seen in all Group 2 patients, which was characterized by rectal prolapse/intussusception, ballooning of the levator hiatus with impingement of the rectal floor and prostatic base, excessive pelvic floor descent and residue ≤ 1/2. Posterolateral outpouching defined as perineal hernia was present in 28.6% of patients in Group 1 and were absent in Group 2. The average levator plate angle on straining differed significantly in the two patterns (21.3° ± 4.1 in Group 1 vs 65.6° ± 8.1 in Group 2; p < 0.05). Responses to the phone interview were obtained from 31 patients (18 of Group 1 and 13 of Group 2, response rate, 86.1%). Patients of Group 1 were always treated without surgery (i.e., biofeedback, dietary regimen, laxatives and/or enemas) which resulted in symptomatic improvement in 12/18 cases (66.6%). Of the patients in Group 2, 2/13 (15.3) underwent surgical repair, consisting of stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) which resulted in symptom recurrence after 6 months and laparoscopic ventral rectopexy which resulted in symptom improvement. The other 11 patients of Group 2 were treated without surgery with symptoms improvement in 3 (27.3%).

Conclusions

The appearance of various abnormalities at MR defecography in men with ODS shows 2 distinct patterns which may have potential relevance for treatment planning, whether conservative or surgical.

     

Usefulness of psyllium in rehabilitation of obstructed defecation

Background  

Rehabilitation is the first therapeutic step of obstructed defecation, after failure of conservative therapy with high-fiber diet and laxatives. This study evaluates the usefulness of psyllium, a bulk-forming agent, when used during rehabilitation of obstructed defecation.     

Treatment strategies in obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence

Obstructed defecation (OD) and fecal incontinence (FI) are challenging clinical problems, which are commonly encountered in the practice of colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists. These disorders socially and psychologically distress patients and greatly impair their quality of life. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes are complex, often incompletely understood and cannot always be determined. As a consequence, many medical, surgical, and behavioral approaches have been described, with no panacea. Over the past decade, advances in an understanding of these disorders together with rational and similar methods of evaluation in anorectal physiology laboratories (ARP), radiology studies, and new surgical techniques have led to promising results. In this brief review, we discuss treatment strategies and recent updates on clinical and therapeutic aspects of obstructed defecation and fecal incontinence.     

Dynamic anal manometry in the assessment of patients with obstructed defecation

Patients with obstructed defecation show no consistent abnormalities when assessed by standard anorectal physiologic methods. With a recently developed technique for dynamic anal manometry, we studied 13 female patients with obstructed defecation and 20 healthy volunteers. Seven parameters of anal function were measured. There were no differences between the median values for the two groups. Seven patients (54 percent; 95 percent confidence limits, 25–81 percent) had anal compliance below the normal range, either during opening or closing of the sphincter at rest (five patients), during squeeze (one patient), or both (one patient). Opening and closing pressures of the sphincer at rest, maximal closing pressure during squeeze, and anal hysteresis were normal. Standard anal manometry did not show any differences between patients and controls. Rectal compliance was lower in patients with obstructed defecation, median difference 5 ml/cm H ₂ O (95 percent confidence limits, 1–9 ml/cm H ₂ O). In conclusion, the more detailed method of dynamic anal manometry shows that some patients with obstructed defecation have a less compliant anal sphincter and a less compliant rectum, but in many patients no abnormal findings can be made.     

Rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructed defecation

The symptoms of obstructed defecation have been attributed to rectal intussusception, and thus rectopexy has been advocated in the surgical management. In this study, patients with obstructed defecation underwent manometry and proctography before and after rectopexy. Seventeen patients (16 females and one male, mean age 51.6 years) were studied. Eleven underwent anterior and posterior fixation of the rectum and six had posterior fixation only. Preoperatively five patients demonstrated rectoanal intussusceptions. Fifteen had significant pelvic descent. No significant change in maximum resting pressure, maximum voluntary contraction, pelvic descent, or anorectal angle was seen postoperatively. In the initial follow-up, many patients had significant amelioration of symptoms. However, on longer follow-up (mean 30.8 months) only two had long-term improvement. The remainder had a poor clinical result in spite of complete resolution of rectal intussusception. Many reported a worsening of symptoms as reflected by an increase in tenesmus and stool frequency. In the two cases with a satisfactory result, both could empty the rectum completely and demonstrated rectoanal intussusception on preoperative evacuation proctography. In those with poor results, four had complete emptying and three had rectoanal intussusception. In conclusion rectopexy is an ineffective treatment for obstructive defecation in most patients.Read at the Tripartite Meeting, Birmingham, United Kingdom, June 19 to 22, 1989.Work is attributed to the Bristol Royal Infirmary, Bristol, United Kingdom.     

Complications and reinterventions after surgery for obstructed defecation

Purpose  Functional results following surgery for obstructed defecation (OD) have been widely investigated, but there are few reports aimed to analyze postoperative complications and re-interventions. This study investigates the adverse events requiring retreatment for obstructed defecation. Methods  We retrospectively analyzed the records of 203 patients operated on by a single surgeon, 20 transabdominally and 183 transperineally (159 manual and 24 stapled). Postoperative complications requiring retreatment and outcome of reinterventions were analyzed. Results  Adverse events requiring retreatment occurred in 14.3% more frequently after abdominal than after perineal procedures (20% vs. 13.7%), but the sample size of the two arms is different. Rectal bleeding and strictures were the most common adverse events (6.9%). Major complications, i.e., ischemic colitis requiring hemicolectomy and pelvic sepsis requiring colostomy also occurred (1%). The overall reintervention rate was 7.5%, (5% after abdominal and 7.6% after perineal surgery). Overall, 59% of the reoperated patients were still constipated at a median follow up of 2 years. Conclusions  Complications requiring retreatment are not uncommon after surgery for OD and reinterventions are often unsuccessful. A careful preoperative evaluation and selection of patients should be undertaken in order to minimize adverse events.     

Surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome-is there an ideal technique

Obstructive defecation syndrome(ODS) is a common disorder with a considerable impact on the quality of life of affected patients.Surgery for ODS remains a challenging topic.There exists a great variety of operative techniques to treat patients with ODS.According to the surgeon’s preference the approach can be transanal,transvaginal,transperineal or transabdominal.All techniques have its advantages and disadvantages.Notably,high evidence based studies are significantly lacking in literature,thus making accurate assessments difficult.Careful patient’s selection is crucial to achieveoptimal functional results.It is mandatory to assess not only defecation disorders but also evaluate overall pelvic floor symptoms,such as fecal incontinence and urinary disorders for choosing an appropriate and tailored strategy.Radiological investigation is essential but may not explain complaints of every patient.     

The application of percutaneous endoscopic colostomy to the management of obstructed defecation

PURPOSE: We describe the case of a 52-year woman with a 17-year history of obstructed defecation in whom all other standard treatments had failed and the patient had refused a colostomy. Her symptoms were controlled by percutaneous endoscopic colostomy with antegrade colonic irrigation. METHOD: A percutaneous endoscopic colostomy tube was placed in the sigmoid colon endoscopically using a colonoscope and the patient irrigated two liters of water through the percutaneous endoscopic colostomy twice each day and was able to successfully evacuate her rectum without excess straining or discomfort. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous endoscopic colostomy is an alternative option to colostomy in the management of obstructed defecation.     

Colectomy for slow transit constipation: effective for patients with coexistent obstructed defecation

Background

Patient selection is a crucial step when considering total abdominal colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (TAC/IRA) for refractory constipation.

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the results of short- and long-term outcomes for patients with pure slow transit constipation (STC) compared to those with slow transit and features of obstructive defecation (STC + OD).

Methods

This study included all patients who underwent TAC/IRA for constipation from 1999–2010. Patients were divided into two groups: group A (STC) and group B (STC + OD) based on abnormal physiology or motility testing in addition to the surgeon's clinical impression of symptomatic obstructive defecation. Demographics, operative variables, and short-term outcomes were collected by retrospective chart review and were compared between groups. Long-term functional outcomes were assessed by telephone survey. This included: number of bowel movements, use of laxatives, antidiarrheal medications, and surgery satisfaction. Validated questionnaires were collected postoperatively.

Results

One hundred forty-four patients (143 females; mean age, 40 (18–68) years old) underwent TAC/IRA by either laparoscopic (63 (44 %)) or open (81 (56 %)) techniques. One hundred three patients had pure STC and 41 had STC + OD. Four patients underwent TAC with end ileostomy at first procedure. Seven patients underwent surgery after a trial of diverting ileostomy. One patient died unexpectedly, 2 days after uneventful surgery. Median follow-up was 43 (IQR, 16–75) months. Five (5 %) patients in group A and two (5 %) in group B underwent subsequent ileostomy for poor functional outcomes. Eighty-eight (68 %) patients were available by telephone. Short- and long-term outcomes were equivalent in both groups as well as patient satisfaction (89 vs. 85 %, p?=?0.7).

Conclusions

Total abdominal colectomy can be offered to selective patients with slow transit constipation and obstructive defecation with equivalent long-term results.