Tiagabine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Partial Epilepsy

Summary: Three studies were conducted to assess tiagabine (TGB) hydrochloride monotherapy in patients with partial seizures. The first was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 11 patients (seven TGB, four placebo) undergoing evaluation for epilepsy surgery. Baseline antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy was discontinued abruptly before monotherapy. Although 24-h seizure rates increased during monotherapy in both groups, patients receiving TGB experienced fewer seizures than placebo patients. Subsequent studies (an open-label, dose-ranging study; n = 31 and a double-blind, randomized comparison of 6 and 36 mg/day TGB; n = 102 and 96, respectively) involved discontinuation of baseline AEDs. In the dose-ranging study, 19 of 31 patients (61%) converted to TGB monotherapy, with a mean final dose of 38.4 mg/day (range 24–54 mg/day) in those who completed the study ( n = 12). In the low- vs. high-dosage study, median 4-week complex partial seizure rates decreased significantly in patients from both dose groups who completed the monotherapy period ( p <0.05 compared with baseline). In the intent-to-treat analysis, significantly more patients in the high-dose group experienced a reduction in seizures of at least 50% compared with the low-dose group ( p = 0.038). Overall, the types of adverse events with TGB monotherapy were similar to those observed in add-on trials. These initial trials in difficult-to-treat epilepsy patients indicate that TGB monotherapy may provide a new approach to the treatment of patients with partial seizures refractory to other AEDs.     

Dose-dependent safety and efficacy of zonisamide: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in patients with refractory partial seizures

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of zonisamide (ZNS) as adjunctive treatment in patients with refractory localization-related epilepsy. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of adjunctive ZNS in 351 patients with refractory partial seizures receiving a stable regimen of one to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Patients were randomized to placebo or ZNS, 100 mg, 300 mg, or 500 mg/day (2:1:1:2) after a 12-week baseline. Dose titration was undertaken over a 6-week titration phase, which was followed by an 18-week fixed-dose assessment phase. Primary efficacy parameters were the differences between ZNS, 500 mg/day, and placebo in the change from baseline in frequency of complex partial (CP) seizures during the fixed-dose assessment phase and in the proportion of CP responders (> or =50% decrease from baseline in seizure frequency). Safety and tolerability also were assessed. RESULTS: Compared with placebo, the highest dose of ZNS (500 mg/day) resulted in a significantly greater decrease in CP seizure frequency from baseline (51.2% vs. 16.3%; p < 0.0001) and a significantly higher proportion of CP responders (52.3% vs. 21.3%; p < 0.001). Both ZNS, 500 mg/day, and 300 mg/day were statistically superior to placebo in reducing the frequency of "all seizures" and simple partial (SP) + CP seizures. For all seizures, a significant dose-response relation was observed (p < 0.0001).The most common adverse events were somnolence, headache, dizziness, and nausea during the titration phase and headache and pharyngitis during the fixed-dose assessment phase. CONCLUSIONS: ZNS provides dose-dependent, effective, and generally well-tolerated adjunctive therapy in patients with partial seizures.     

Double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover study of lamotrigine in treatment resistant partial seizures.

The results of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo controlled, crossover trial of lamotrigine as add-on therapy in patients with partial seizures poorly controlled by established antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are presented. The study consisted of two 12 week treatment periods each followed by a four week washout period. During the lamotrigine treatment phase, patients received 150 mg or 300 mg daily dose depending on their concomitant AEDs to achieve concentrations in the range 1-3 mg/L. Forty one patients were entered at four centres and all patients entered completed the study. There was a highly significant (p < 0.001) decrease in total seizure counts on lamotrigine compared with placebo. Overall, 22% of patients experienced at least a 50% reduction in the total numbers of all seizures types on lamotrigine, compared with none on placebo. When the total numbers of partial seizures (simple and complex partial) were analysed there was also a significant (p < 0.05) reduction in seizure counts on lamotrigine compared with placebo. When total numbers of secondarily generalised seizures were compared the trend for a reduction in this seizure type did not achieve significance (0.05 < p < 0.1). Concomitant AED plasma concentrations were virtually unchanged. It is concluded that lamotrigine is an effective AED in the treatment of therapy-resistant partial seizures.     

Controlled trial of lamotrigine (Lamictal®) for treatment-resistant partial seizures

The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (Lamictal®) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in 56 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. Lamotrigine or placebo was added to the patients' existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of lamotrigine varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Thirty-eight patients completed the trial and 7 withdrew because of adverse experiences. There was a statistically significant reduction in seizure counts on lamotrigine compared with placebo for total seizures (30.3% reduction, 95% CI 8.4%, 47.0%), complex partial seizures (29.2.% reduction, 95% CI 3.8%, 47.9%) and secondary generalised seizures (37.9%, CI 18.9%, 52.4%). The analysis of total seizure days showed a similar significant reduction during lamotrigine treatment for the same seizure categories. There was no statistically significant difference in reporting of adverse events between lamotrigine and placebo except for dizziness which was reported more frequently on lamotrigine than on placebo. There were no differences in abnormal haematological or biochemical findings between lamotrigine and placebo, and lamotrigine had no effect on plasma concentrations of concomitant AEDs.     

Rufinamide for the adjunctive treatment of partial seizures in adults and adolescents: A randomized placebo-controlled trial

Purpose:   To evaluate efficacy and safety of adjunctive treatment with rufinamide 1600 mg twice daily in subjects aged ≥16 years with refractory partial seizures.
Methods:   This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trial included an 8-week baseline phase and a 13-week double-blind phase. Treatment was initiated with rufinamide 400 mg twice daily or placebo; rufinamide was titrated to 1600 mg twice daily. Percentage change in partial seizure frequency was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcome measures included total partial seizure frequency and the percentage of subjects experiencing a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency.
Results:   Three hundred thirteen subjects were randomized; 156 subjects received rufinamide and 157 received placebo. Rufinamide-treated subjects experienced a 20.4% median reduction in partial seizure frequency relative to baseline, while placebo-treated subjects had an increase of 1.6% (p = 0.02). Exclusion of subjects taking carbamazepine in a post hoc analysis resulted in a reduction of 29.2% versus 0.7% in the placebo group (p = 0.05), whereas the treatment difference in subjects taking carbamazepine was not significant. Of rufinamide-treated subjects, 28.2% experienced a ≥50% decrease in partial seizure frequency versus 18.6% of placebo-treated subjects (p = 0.04). The most common adverse events associated with rufinamide treatment were dizziness, nausea, diplopia, and ataxia; they occurred primarily during the titration phase.
Discussion:   Adjunctive therapy with rufinamide 3200 mg/day compared with matching placebo demonstrated efficacy and was generally well tolerated in adults with partial seizures. Further study of this agent in adults with partial seizures taking a range of baseline AEDs is warranted.     

Controlled Trial of Lamotrigine (Lamictar) for Refractory Partial Seizures

The antiepileptic effect of lamotrigine (LTG) was assessed in a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trial in 24 adult patients with refractory partial seizures. LTG or placebo was added to existing antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). The dose of LTG varied from 75 to 400 mg daily. Three patients did not complete the trial. One was withdrawn from the trial with ataxia, tiredness, dyspnea, and diplopia while receiving LTG and died 18 days later of invasive carcinoma involving the liver. A second patient was withdrawn during baseline for contravening admission criteria, and a third received LTG in error during both treatment periods. Twenty-one patients (12 men and 9 women) completed the trial. An analysis of seizure counts in the 12-week treatment period with LTG showed a statistically significant reduction in seizures as compared with placebo for total seizures (p less than 0.002), partial seizures (p less than 0.002), and secondarily generalized seizures (p less than 0.05). The analysis of total seizure days showed a significant reduction during LTG treatment (p less than 0.002). There were no statistically significant changes in plasma concentrations of phenytoin (PHT), carbamazepine (CBZ), primidone (PRM), or phenobarbital (PB) between the two treatment periods. The most common adverse events reported during the trial were diplopia, drowsiness, tiredness, ataxia, and headache, but although these were more frequent during LTG treatment, the differences from placebo were not statistically significant. No hematological or biochemical changes were noted.     

Gabapentin as Add-On Therapy in Children with Refractory Partial Seizures: A 12-Week, Multicentre, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin; GBP) as add-on therapy for refractory partial seizures in paediatric patients aged 3-12 years. METHODS: After a 6-week baseline period, 247 patients (54 centres) entered a 12-week double-blind phase and were randomized to receive either GBP (t.i.d., titrated to 23-35 mg/kg/ day) or placebo. Seizure activity and type were recorded daily. Efficacy variables included Response Ratio (RRatio), responder rate, and percentage change in frequency (PCH) for all partial seizures; PCH and RRatio for individual types of partial seizures; and investigator and parent/guardian global assessments of seizure frequency and patient well-being. RESULTS: RRatio for all partial seizures was significantly lower (better) for GBP-treated patients (p = 0.0407). Responder rate favored GBP, but the difference between treatment groups was not statistically significant. Median PCH for all partial seizures for the GBP treatment group (-17.0%) was better than that for the placebo group (-6.5%). Median PCH for specific seizure types showed GBP to be most effective in controlling complex partial seizures (-35%) and secondarily generalized seizures (-28%) when compared with placebo (-12%, +13%, respectively). A greater percentage of GBP-treated patients exhibited improvement according to investigator and parent/guardian global assessments, with a statistically significant difference observed in the parent/guardian global assessment of seizure-frequency reduction (p = 0.046). Three GBP patients and one placebo patient were seizure free during the double-blind treatment period. GBP was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: GBP was effective and well tolerated as an add-on therapy for partial seizures in paediatric patients with previously drug-resistant seizures.     

Double-Blind Crossover Trial of Progabide Versus Placebo in Severe Epilepsies

In this double-blind, two-period, crossover trial with randomized treatment assignment, progabide (+/- 30 mg/kg/day) and placebo were compared as add-on to standard therapy in 20 "therapy-resistant" epileptic patients (11 males, nine females; age range, 7-47 years). The duration of each treatment period was 6 weeks. Crossover was performed gradually over 3-4 days. Twenty-four patients entered the study: three dropped out for reasons unrelated to progabide effects; one dropped out during the placebo period because of increased seizure frequency. Of the 20 patients who completed the study, 14 had partial, two partial plus secondary generalized, and four generalized seizures. Preexisting antiepileptic treatment consisted of one antiepileptic drug (AED) in three, two AEDs in eight, three AEDs in five, and four AEDs in four patients (mean, 2.5 AEDs/patient). The following parameters were recorded at biweekly intervals: (a) efficacy parameters--total seizure count, counts of each seizure type, and global clinical judgment; (b) safety parameters--adverse drug effects, brief clinical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests; and (c) plasma concentrations of progabide and of the associated AEDs. Twelve patients were considered to be improved (p less than 0.01) with progabide by global clinical judgment compared with two patients improved with placebo. Nine patients of 20 had a 48-100% reduction of total seizure count in the verum period, leading to a significant reduction of total seizure number and of complex partial seizures in the verum period as compared with the placebo period (p less than 0.05). Adverse effects were reported or observed in 10 patients during the progabide period and in five patients in the placebo period. The side effects were generally mild and consisted of somnolence in four cases and of tremors, dry mouth, troubles of equilibrium, anorexia, euphoria, depression, and anxiety in individual patients; a 15-20% reduction of the progabide dose was required in two cases only. No treatment-related alterations in results of laboratory tests were observed.     

Adjunctive therapy with oxcarbazepine in children with partial seizures. The Oxcarbazepine Pediatric Study Group

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of oxcarbazepine (OXC) as adjunctive therapy in children with inadequately controlled partial seizures on one or two concomitant antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). BACKGROUND: OXC has shown antiepileptic activity in several comparative monotherapy trials in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy, and in a placebo-controlled monotherapy trial in hospitalized patients evaluated for epilepsy surgery. DESIGN: A total of 267 patients were evaluated in a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled trial consisting of three phases: 1) a 56-day baseline phase (patients maintained on their current AEDs); 2) a 112-day double-blind treatment phase (patients received either OXC 30-46 mg/kg/day orally or placebo); and 3) an open-label extension phase. Data are reported only from the double-blind treatment phase; the open-label extension phase is ongoing. METHODS: Children (3 to 17 years old) with inadequately controlled partial seizures (simple, complex, and partial seizures evolving to secondarily generalized seizures) were enrolled. RESULTS: Patients treated with OXC experienced a significantly greater median percent reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency than patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0001; 35% versus 9%, respectively). Forty-one percent of patients treated with OXC experienced a > or =50% reduction from baseline in partial seizure frequency per 28 days compared with 22% of patients treated with placebo (p = 0.0005). Ninety-one percent of the group treated with OXC and 82% of the group treated with placebo reported > or =1 adverse event; vomiting, somnolence, dizziness, and nausea occurred more frequently (twofold or greater) in the group treated with OXC. CONCLUSION: OXC adjunctive therapy administered in a dose range of 6 to 51 mg/kg/day (median 31.4 mg/kg/day) is safe, effective, and well tolerated in children with partial seizures.     

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam 3000 mg/d in patients with refractory partial seizures: a multicenter, double-blind, responder-selected study evaluating monotherapy. European Levetiracetam Study Group

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy in selected patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: In this multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, responder-selected study, patients were randomized (2:1 ratio) to receive oral LEV 1500 mg twice daily or placebo during a 12-week add-on phase. Treatment responders (patients with a reduction in partial seizure frequency of 50% or more compared with baseline) entered a monotherapy phase that included a maximum 12-week down-titration period and 12 weeks of monotherapy at 1500 mg twice daily. In both phases, responder rate, seizure frequency, and adverse events were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients (placebo, n = 105; LEV, n = 181) entered the add-on phase, and 86 patients (placebo, n = 17; LEV, n = 69) were eligible for the monotherapy phase. Thirty-six of 181 patients (19.9%) who received LEV completed the entire study compared with only 10 of 105 patients (9.5%) in the placebo group (p = 0.029). The odds of completing the study on LEV were 2.36 times (95% confidence interval, 1.08, 5.57) higher than on placebo. The responder rate during the add-on phase was significantly higher in the LEV group compared with the placebo group (42.1% vs. 16.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). In the LEV monotherapy group, the median percent reduction in partial seizure frequency compared with baseline was 73.8% (p = 0.037), with a responder rate of 59.2%. Nine patients (18.4%) remained seizure-free on LEV monotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Conversion to LEV monotherapy (1500 mg twice daily) is effective and well tolerated in patients with refractory partial seizures who responded to 3000 mg/d LEV as add-on therapy.     

Overview of the Clinical Efficacy of Lamotrigine

Summary: Testing the efficacy of lamotrigine (LTG) in epileptic patients has been approached in several ways. The first pilot study examined the effect of a single dose of LTG in patients with frequent interictal spikes, and a reduction in spike frequency was observed. Subsequently, single doses reduced photosensitivity in appropriate patients. Single-blind administration of LTG for 1 week in addition to the patients' regular antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), in patients with refractory seizures, reduced seizures despite the short duration of therapy. This regimen was continued using a placebo-controlled crossover study with 1-week duration of treatment. Efficacy in partial and tonic-clonic seizures was subsequently confirmed in four double-blind crossover studies; a meta-analysis of these four studies showed a 30% reduction in partial seizures despite the intractable nature of the seizures in the patients included. Current studies aim at evaluating the drug as monotherapy and in different seizure types.     

Pregabalin add-on treatment in patients with partial seizures: a novel evaluation of flexible-dose and fixed-dose treatment in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study

PURPOSE: To evaluate pregabalin as add-on therapy for patients with partial seizures administered as fixed dose or as flexible dose adjusted to optimal seizure reduction and tolerability. METHODS: Patients receiving antiepileptic drugs (98.8% between 1 and 3 AEDs; 1.2% on more than 3 AEDs) and experiencing > or =4 partial seizures during the 6-week baseline period and no 4-week seizure-free interval were randomized (1:2:2) to placebo (n = 73), pregabalin fixed dose (600 mg/day BID; n = 137), or pregabalin flexible dose (n = 131; 150 and 300 mg/day for 2 weeks each; 450 and 600 mg/day for 4 weeks each, BID) for 12 weeks. Dosage could be adjusted based on tolerability and maintained when a 4-week seizure-free period was achieved. Primary efficacy parameter was reduction in seizure frequency from baseline. RESULTS: Both pregabalin regimens significantly reduced seizure frequency compared with placebo, by 35.4%, for flexible dose (p = 0.0091) and 49.3% for fixed dose (p = 0.0001) versus 10.6% for placebo, and the fixed-dose group was superior to the flexible-dose group (p = 0.0337). Most adverse events were mild or moderate. Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 6.8% (placebo), 12.2% (pregabalin flexible dose), and 32.8% (pregabalin fixed dose). Patients receiving pregabalin fixed dose discontinued due to adverse event earlier than other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregabalin administered twice daily, either as fixed (600 mg/day), or as flexible (150-600 mg/day) dose, was highly effective and generally well-tolerated as add-on therapy for partial seizures with or without secondary generalization. Lower incidence of adverse events and discontinuations were achieved in patients receiving pregabalin when dosing was individualized to optimize efficacy and tolerability.     

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of rufinamide as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial-onset seizures

Purpose: Efficacy and safety of adjunctive rufinamide (3,200 mg/day) was assessed in adolescents and adults with inadequately controlled partial‐onset seizures receiving maintenance therapy with up to three antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Methods: This randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, parallel‐group, multicenter study comprised a 56‐day baseline phase (BP), 12‐day titration phase, and 84‐day maintenance phase (MP). The primary efficacy variable was percentage change in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days (MP vs. BP). Secondary efficacy outcome measures included ≥50% responder rate and reduction in mean total partial seizure frequency during the MP. Safety and tolerability evaluation included adverse events (AEs), physical and neurologic examinations, and laboratory values. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic assessments were conducted. Results: Three hundred fifty‐seven patients were randomized: 176 to rufinamide and 181 to placebo. Patients had a median of 13.3 seizures per 28 days during BP; 86% were receiving ≥2 AEDs. For the intent‐to‐treat population, the median percentage reduction in total partial seizure frequency per 28 days was 23.25 for rufinamide versus 9.80 for placebo (p = 0.007). Rufinamide‐treated patients were more than twice as likely to have had a ≥50% reduction in partial seizure frequency (32.5% vs. 14.3%; p < 0.001) and had a greater reduction in median total partial seizure rate per 28 days during the MP (13.2 vs. 5.2; p < 0.001). Treatment‐emergent AEs occurring at ≥5% higher incidence in the rufinamide group compared with placebo were dizziness, fatigue, nausea, somnolence, and diplopia. Conclusions: Adjunctive treatment with rufinamide reduced total partial seizures in refractory patients. AEs reported were consistent with the known tolerability profile of rufinamide.     

Gabapentin (Neurontin) as Add-on Therapy in Patients with Partial Seizures: A Double-Blind,Placebo-Controlled Study

Summary: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study evaluated the efficacy and safety of gabapentin (Neurontin, GBP) as add-on therapy in 272 patients with refractory partial seizures who were receiving one to two standard antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Efficacy assessments compared the frequency of partial seizures during the 12-week treatment phase (T) and the 12-week baseline period (B). The primary analysis compared data for patients receiving GBP 900 mg/day with placebo; the GBP 1,200-mglday group provided doseresponse data. Efficacy criteria were percentage of change in seizure frequency (PCH), responder rate (percentage of patients with ≥50% reduction in seizure frequency), and response ratio, where RRatio = (T B)/(T + B). Median PCH was–21.8% in the 900-mg/day group and ?17.8% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with ?0.3% in the placebo group. Responder rate was 22.9% in the 900-mg/day group and 10.1% in the placebo group (p = 0.020, Fisher's exact test). Adjusted mean Rratio was-0.136 in the 900-mg/day group and ?0.025 in the placebo group (p = 0.0046, analysis of variance ANOVA). Results showed slightly greater improvement for the 1,20-mg/day than for the 900-mg/day group (RRatio =?0.157, responder rate 28.0%). Adverse events (AE) occurred in 69% of patients in the 900-mg/day group and in 64% in the 1,200-mg/day group as compared with 52% in patients receiving placebo as add-on therapy. The most frequent AE among patients treated with GBP were somnolence, dizziness, and fatigue. Clinical laboratory evaluations showed no clinically important trends and no evidence of hepatic or hematopoietic effects. GBP is safe and effective in treating some patients with refractory partial seizures.     

Occurrence of psychosis in patients with epilepsy randomized to tiagabine or placebo treatment

PURPOSE: Patients with drug-resistant epilepsy have a higher incidence of psychiatric problems and possibly greater intolerance to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) than do other patients with epilepsy. Concern has been raised that gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)ergic drugs may be associated with treatment-emergent psychosis. Tiagabine (TGB; Gabitril), a new AED that blocks synaptic GABA uptake, was developed in trials of drug-resistant patients with epilepsy. We conducted ad hoc analyses of adverse events, drug intolerance, and treatment response to evaluate the association between TGB treatment and psychosis and whether psychiatric history might be predictive of tolerance or effectiveness of this GABAergic drug. METHODS: Data were analyzed from two multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of add-on TGB therapy (32 or 56 mg daily) in 554 adolescents and adults with complex partial seizures (CPSs). After an 8- or 12-week baseline phase, double-blind treatment consisted of a 4-week titration period (with TGB dose gradually increased to 32 or 56 mg daily) and an 8- or 12-week fixed-dose period. Adverse events commonly associated with psychosis were evaluated. Treatment intolerance and effectiveness (> or =50% reduction in CPS rate) were compared among patients with and without psychiatric histories. RESULTS: Psychotic symptoms (hallucinations) were observed in three (0.8%) of 356 TGB-treated patients and none of 198 placebo-treated patients (p = 0.556, NS). Statistical analysis showed no interaction between psychiatric history and drug intolerance or treatment outcome. CONCLUSIONS: TGB administration appears to carry no significant increased risk of treatment-emergent psychosis. Psychiatric history was not predictive of the tolerance or effectiveness of the drug.     

随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、多中心研究唑尼沙胺添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性

目的 评价唑尼沙胺(ZNS)作为添加用药治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效性和安全性.方法 采用多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、添加治疗设计.240例确诊为癫(癎)部分性发作的受试者按照1:1的比例随机分配到ZNS治疗组或安慰剂组.在前4周加鼋期内受试者自100 mg/d逐渐加量至300 mg/d,随后进入12周的稳定治疗期.在稳定期内可根据患者情况酌情减量,或加量至最大剂量400 mg/d.有效性评价的主要指标为稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线值减少百分数的中位值,重要的次要评价指标为有效率,即部分性癫(癎)发作次数减少≥50%者的比例.同时对药物的安全性进行评价.结果 ZNS组受试者稳定期部分性癫(癎)发作频率较基线期减少百分数(48.4%)显著高于安慰剂组(26.6%),组间差异有统计学意义(F=4.904,P=0.028);ZNS组治疗部分性癫(癎)发作的有效率(48.6%)高于安慰剂组(34.9%),差异有统计学意义(X2=4.046,P=0.044),其中以复杂部分性癫(癎)的组间差异最为显著(分别为52.2%和33.3%,X2=5.607,P=0.018).ZNS组与安慰剂组不良事件发生率相当,与ZNS相关的不良事件多为头晕、头痛、嗜睡、食欲下降、恶心等.结论 ZNS能有效治疗部分性癫(癎),降低癫(癎)发作频率,对复杂部分性癫(癎)发作治疗效果尤为突出.ZNS耐受性良好,受试者用药安全性较高.     

Comparison of the cognitive effects of tiagabine and carbamazepine as monotherapy in newly diagnosed adult patients with partial epilepsy: pooled analysis of two long-term, randomized, follow-up studies

PURPOSE: Patients with epilepsy are at greater risk for cognitive impairment than are age- and education-matched controls. Cognitive decline is a significant adverse event associated with many first-generation anticonvulsant drugs (AEDs); however, the past decade has seen the introduction of several new AEDs with more-favorable cognitive profiles. Tiagabine (TGB) is indicated as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial seizures. The cognitive effects of TGB and carbamazepine (CBZ) monotherapy were evaluated in adult epilepsy patients with partial seizures. METHODS: This analysis pooled data from two randomized studies with similar populations, dosing, and cognitive assessments. TGB was titrated to 20-30 mg/day and CBZ to 400-800 mg/day over a 6-week period. A control or no-drug group of untreated patients with a single epileptic seizure was included for comparison. Cognitive function was assessed at baseline and 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 105 epilepsy patients enrolled, 79 completed the 52 weeks of monotherapy (TGB, 74%; CBZ, 77%). Altogether, 19 untreated patients composed the no-drug group. During the 52-week follow-up, only one statistically significant difference was found between the treatment groups and the no-drug group [verbal fluency task: F(2, 92) = 3.16; p = 0.047]. On further analysis, it was determined that this statistical difference was solely based on the patients receiving CBZ performing worse than the control group (p = 0.048). Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.05) were found on six (26%) of 23 variables with TGB and CBZ, as well as the no-drug group, although the variables differed between the groups. Significant worsening in the test scores was not seen in any of the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this 52-week, follow-up study show that successful TGB monotherapy with 20-30 mg/day has a cognitive profile similar to that of successful long-term CBZ monotherapy with 400-800 mg/day in newly diagnosed patients with epilepsy and to that of untreated patients with a single seizure. We observed no significant decline in cognitive scores associated with TGB monotherapy.     

Levetiracetam for partial seizures: results of a double-blind, randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 500 mg bid and 1500 mg bid levetiracetam as adjunctive therapy for refractory partial seizures in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicenter trial. METHODS: The authors studied patients with uncontrolled partial seizures (minimum 12 per 12 weeks), regardless of whether they became secondarily generalized, for 38 weeks. A 12-week baseline was followed by random assignment to adjunctive therapy with placebo (n = 95), levetiracetam 1000 mg/day (n = 98), or levetiracetam 3000 mg/day (n = 101). Upward titration over 4 weeks was followed by 14 weeks of fixed dose treatment, and concluded with an 8-week medication withdrawal period or entering a follow-up study. RESULTS: Of 294 patients randomized, 268 completed the study. Partial seizure frequency during the entire evaluation period (primary efficacy variable) was lower with levetiracetam compared to placebo (p /=10%), mostly mild to moderate in severity, with incidences higher than placebo were asthenia, dizziness, flu syndrome, headache, infection, rhinitis, and somnolence. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive therapy with levetiracetam was effective and well tolerated in controlling partial seizures.     

Adjuvant Vigabatrin in Refractory Epilepsy: A Ceiling to Effective Dosage in Individual Patients?

A double-blind, randomized, cross-over study of additional vigabatrin (γ-vinyl-GABA, VGB, 1.0 g twice daily for 6 weeks, followed by 1.5 g twice daily for 6 weeks) and matched placebo was undertaken in 24 patients with refractory epilepsy. Nineteen completed the trial satisfactorily. Fewer seizure days were reported during VGB treatment [placebo 41, VGB 23, p < 0.05, 95% confidence interval (CI) ?1.5 to ?14]. An overall reduction in median seizure numbers failed to reach statistical significance (n = 19; placebo 52, VGB 32, NS, 95% CI ?18 to + 24). Subgroup analysis, however, showed a significant reduction in partial seizures (n = 17) with 2 g VGB daily (placebo 22, VGB 13, p < 0.05, 95% CI ?0.5 to ?16.5), but not with higher dosage (placebo 28, VGB 22, NS, 95% CI ? 18 to + 11). A deterioration in control of partial seizures as compared with the equivalent placebo phase was observed when patients were changed from 2 to 3 g/day VGB (2 g VGB 13, 3 g VGB 22, p = 0.05, 95% CI 0 to +20). Loss of efficacy was noted in 3 patients, and seizure control worsened slightly in 5 others. One previously resistant patient developed a therapeutic response, and 2 other patients reported an additional useful reduction in seizures. In the remaining 8 patients, seizure frequency did not change. VGB did not appear to benefit tonic-clonic seizures. Serum VGB concentrations were higher during treatment with 3 g (15.5 ± 8.9 mg/L) daily than with 2 g (13.5 ± 11.2 mg/L). No important alterations were noted in the concentrations of concomitantly administered antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) throughout the trial. VGB is useful adjuvant therapy for treatment of partial seizures. There may be a ceiling to effective dosage. This demands individual dose titration for each patient.     

The Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Children and Adolescents with Refractory Generalized Epilepsy: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Crossover Study

Summary: Purpose: We report a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study of lamotrigine (LTG) as add-on treatment in therapy-resistant, generalized epilepsy in children and adolescents (n = 30).
Methods: Twenty patients had Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. Each patient acted as his or her own control. LTG and placebo were randomly added to existing antiepileptic medication (AEDs). The LTG dosage was individualized in an open phase preceding the placebo/treatment phase. Patients who responded to LTG in the open phase went on to the double-blind phase. "Responders" were defined as patients with a >50% seizure reduction or less severe seizures or both, or improved behavior or improved motor skills or both. "Nonresponders" were defined as children who showed no positive effects of LTG with plasma levels of 10 μg/ml or children who had adverse events during the open phase.
Results: There was a clear statistically significant reduction of seizure frequency in LTG compared with placebo treatment. None of the children studied showed abnormal biochemical or hematologic findings, or changes in plasma levels of concomitantly administered AEDs.
Conclusions: LTG is a well-tolerated and effective treatment in children with intractable generalized epilepsies, including those with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome. The study design allowed a double-blind placebo-controlled assessment of LTG although the participating children used 19 different AED combinations at entry.