A prospective randomised trial of protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil with or without mitomycin C in advanced colorectal cancer

Background: To compare protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with and without mitomycin C (MMC) in a prospectively randomised study and analyse for tumour response, survival, toxicity and quality of life (QL).Patients and methods: Two hundred patients with advanced colorectal cancer received PVI 5-FU 300 mg/m²/day for a maximum of 24 weeks and were randomised to PVI 5-FU alone or PVI 5-FU + MMC 10 mg/m² (7 mg/m² from June 1995) 6 weekly for 4 courses.Results: Overall response was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI] 44.1%–63.9%) with PVI 5-FU + MMC compared to 38% (95% CI 28.3%–47.7%) for PVI 5-FU alone (P = 0.024). The median failure free survival was 7.9 months in PVI 5-FU plus MMC and 5.4 months with PVI 5-FU alone (P = 0.033) and at one year 31.9% for the combination compared to 17.7% for PVI 5-FU alone. Median survival was 14 months with MMC and 15 months in 5-FU alone; one-year survival 51.7% vs. 57.2%. PVI 5-FU + MMC caused more overall haematological toxicity but CTC grades 3/4 was increased only for thrombocytopaenia. Two patients treated with a cumulative dose of MMC of 40 mg/m² developed haemolytic uraemic syndrome warranting the reduction in cumulative MMC dose to 28 mg/m². The global QL scores were better for PVI 5-FU + MMC arm at 24 weeks, but the remaining QL data showed no differences.Conclusions: PVI 5-FU + MMC results in failure-free survival and response advantage, tolerable toxicity and better QL when compared to PVI 5-FU alone but no overall survival advantage. There is no irreversible toxicity with MMC at a cumulative dose of 28 mg/m².     

Phase I-II study of gemcitabine and fluorouracil as a continuous infusion in patients with pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities, and efficacy of gemcitabine combined with fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with pancreatic cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable, locally advanced, nonresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer were candidates for the study. 5-FU was given via protracted venous infusion (PVI) at a fixed dosage of 200 mg/m2/d, and gemcitabine was administered weekly for 3 consecutive weeks every 4 weeks. The initial dose of gemcitabine was 700 mg/m2 and was escalated in increments of 100 mg/m2/wk until the appearance of severe toxicity. Measurements of efficacy included the following: response rate; clinical benefit response, which is a composite measurement of pain, performance status, and weight loss; time to disease progression; and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients received a total of 109 courses. Dose-limiting toxicity, which consisted of grade 4 neutropenia with fever (one patient) and grade 4 thrombocytopenia (one patient), was observed in two of three patients treated with 1,100 mg/m2/wk of gemcitabine. On the basis of these results, the MTD of gemcitabine with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2. Sixteen patients developed grade 3-4 neutropenia, and three patients developed grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia. Grade 3-4 nonhematologic toxicity consisted of diarrhea (two patients) and cutaneous toxicity, asthenia, edema, mucositis, and nausea and vomiting (one patient each). The delivered dose-intensity of gemcitabine was similar at the 1,000 mg/m2 dose level (599 mg/m2/wk) as at the 900 mg/m2 (601 mg/m2/wk) dose level. For this reason, the recommended dose of gemcitabine for phase II evaluation on this schedule was 900 mg/m2. Five patients had objective responses (one complete response and four partial responses; response rate, 19.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 6.5 to 39.3), and 10 patients had improvement of disease-related symptoms (45%; 95% CI, 24 to 67). After a median follow-up of 17.7 months (range, 7.8 to 24.8 months), the median progression-free survival and overall survival times were 7.4 months (95% CI, 3.3 to 11.4) and 10.3 months (95% CI, 8.1 to 12.5), respectively. CONCLUSION: The MTD of gemcitabine when combined with 5-FU via PVI on this schedule was 1,000 mg/m2/ wk; however, on the basis of administered dose-intensity, the recommended dose for additional investigation is 900 mg/m2. This combination chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.     

A phase I/II study of combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND: In an effort to improve efficacy of single-agent gemcitabine in pancreatic cancer, several studies have examined the effects of 5-FU combined with gemcitabine. However, no studies to date have been performed in Japanese patients. We thus conducted a phase I/II study of gemcitabine and infusional 5-FU in Japanese patients to determine a recommended dosage for this combination and clarify efficacy and toxicity. METHODS: Phase I evaluated the frequency of dose limiting toxicity of two 5-FU dosages (400 and 500 mg/m(2)/day) infused continuously over 5 days combined with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks. Results from phase I determined the recommended dosage to be examined in phase II for effect on survival period, clinical benefit response (CBR), tumor response and safety. RESULTS: A total of 34 chemo-naive patients were entered into the study. All had a Karnofsky performance of > or =50 points and distant metastases. Dose limiting toxicities in phase I determined the recommended 5-FU dosage at 400 mg/m(2)/day. Grade 3-4 hematological toxicities (neutropenia, leukopenia and thrombocytopenia) were the most common severe toxicities. For the 28 patients administered the recommended dosage, 1-year survival rate was 14.3%, median survival time 7.1 months and progression free survival 3.2 months. Seven patients achieved a 25% overall response rate and three showed 27.3% improvement in CBR. CONCLUSION: Although a meaningful survival benefit over single-agent gemcitabine was not demonstrated, 5-FU 400 mg/m(2)/day infused continuously over 5 days in combination with gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2) x 3 every 4 weeks appeared to be a moderately effective palliative treatment with low toxicity in Japanese patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer.     

Phase I dose-escalation trial of irinotecan with continuous infusion 5-FU first line, in metastatic colorectal cancer

This single-centre phase I trial was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose of irinotecan and the recommended dose to use in combination with a fixed dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered as a protracted venous infusion, for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Tolerability and efficacy were secondary end points. In all, 22 patients, median age 57 years, were treated with escalating, weekly doses of irinotecan (50, 75, 100 and 85 mg m(-2)) in combination with 250 mg m(-2) 5-FU administered as a continuous infusion. All patients had measurable disease. The combination was well tolerated up to an irinotecan dose of 75 mg m(-2). However, three out of five patients at the 100 mg m(-2) irinotecan dose level had their dose reduced due to multiple grade 2 toxicities, and eventually one patient stopped treatment due to grade 3 diarrhoea and multiple grade 2 toxicities. Subsequent patients were recruited at an irinotecan dose level of 85 mg m(-2). The overall response rate was 55%, comprising one complete and 11 partial responses (PRs). Six patients also achieved sustained stable disease (SD), giving a clinical benefit (complete response/PR/SD) response of 82%. The median duration of response was 238 days (8.5 months) and median time to progression was 224 days (8.0 months). Two patients who achieved PRs underwent partial hepatectomies. Thus, irinotecan (85 mg m(-2)) combined with a continuous infusion of 5-FU (250 mg m(-2)) is an active and well-tolerated regimen for the treatment of metastatic CRC. It represents an effective treatment for patients who require close supervision and support, throughout their initial exposure to chemotherapy for this disease, and this dose combination was recommended for an ongoing phase II study.     

Phase I study of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin by continuous infusion chronotherapy and pelvic radiotherapy in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer

PURPOSE: To determine the maximal tolerated dose of chronomodulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin (LV) given concurrently with radiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Forty-five patients with T3, T4 or recurrent rectal cancer received concurrent radiotherapy to a minimal dose of 4500 cGy. Chemotherapy was administered by a programmable pump in chronomodulated fashion, with 62.5% of the total dose given within 7 hours around 9:30 pm. The starting doses were LV at 5 mg/m2/d and 5-FU at 150 mg/m2/d. LV was escalated in 5-mg/m2 increments to 20 mg/m2/d; 5-FU was then escalated in 25 mg/m2 increments to the maximal tolerated dose. RESULTS: Diarrhea and stomatitis were dose limiting, with Grade 3 or worse toxicity occurring in 16% and 5% of patients, respectively. Thirty-seven patients (84%) received their scheduled dose of radiotherapy (range, 4500-6000 cGy). Thirty-two patients had clinical T3 disease; all were treated with definitive surgery; 23 (71%) underwent sphincter-sparing surgery with complete resection in 28 (87%). Ten patients (31%) had no evidence of tumor in the pathologic specimen. CONCLUSION: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy in rectal cancer using chronomodulated 5-FU and LV is feasible. The recommended Phase II dose is 5-FU 200 mg/m2 and LV 20 mg/m2 daily for 5 weeks.     

Multicenter randomized phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin in inoperable pancreatic cancer.

PURPOSE: To compare protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin (MMC) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer in a multicenter, prospectively randomized study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred eight patients were randomized to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/d for a maximum of 24 weeks) or PVI 5-FU plus MMC (7 mg/m(2) every 6 weeks for four courses). The major end points were tumor response, survival, toxicity, and quality of life (QOL). RESULTS: The two treatment groups were balanced for baseline demographic factors, and 62% had metastatic disease. The overall response rate was 8.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]) 3.2% to 13.7% for patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 17.6%; 95% CI 10.3% to 25.1% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.04). Median failure-free survival was 2.8 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.14). Median survival was 5.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 6.5 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P =.34). Toxicities in both arms were mild. There was an increased incidence of neutropenia in the 5-FU plus MMC arm (P <.01), although no differences in infection were seen. No patients developed hemolytic uremic syndrome. Global QOL improved significantly after 24 weeks of treatment compared with baseline for patients receiving 5-FU plus MMC, although there was no statistically significant difference in QOL between arms. CONCLUSION: PVI 5-FU plus MMC resulted in a superior response rate in comparison with PVI 5-FU alone in advanced pancreatic cancer, but this did not translate into a survival advantage. These results emphasize the importance of chemotherapy in this setting and the continuing value of the fluoropyrimidines in pancreatic cancer.     

Protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil with concomitant radiotherapy compared with bolus 5-fluorouracil for unresectable pancreatic cancer

Radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) administered by protracted venous infusion (PVI) replaced our prior institutional protocol of RT with bolus administration of 5-FU as standard therapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer in 1994. In this article, we compare the treatment intensity, toxicity, and outcome for patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated on these sequential protocols. Fifty-four patients, 27 on each protocol, with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic cancer received chemoradiotherapy. The radiotherapy field included the gross tumor volume and regional lymph nodes to a dose of 45 Gy, followed by "boost" to the gross tumor volume to 54 Gy to 60 Gy. From 1987 to 1994, patients received concurrent 5-FU administered by bolus injection, at a dose of 500 mg/m2 on days 1 to 3 and days 29 to 31 of RT. After December 1994, 5-FU was administered by PVI (200-250 mg/m2) beginning on day 1 and continuing until the completion of RT. The chemotherapy treatment intensity was increased in the group receiving 5-FU by PVI, as evidenced by an increased average weekly and cumulative dose of 5-FU (p < 0.01). The radiotherapy treatment intensity was equivalent between the two groups. The incidence of objectively quantified toxicity was not statistically different between treatment groups. Overall survival remained poor in both treatment groups. With a median follow-up of 18 months (range: 3-30 months) for surviving patients, the 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year survivals for the PVI 5-FU-treated group versus the bolus 5-FU-treated group were 56% versus 52%, 34% versus 18%, and 22% versus 13%, respectively (p = 0.9). Radiotherapy with concomitant 5-FU by PVI results in a greater weekly and total dose of chemotherapy. The method of 5-FU administration (bolus versus PVI) did not change the RT treatment intensity, experienced toxicity, or overall survival.     

Plasma concentrations of 5-fluorouracil and F-beta-alanine following oral administration of S-1, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase inhibitory fluoropyrimidine,as compared with protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral S-1, a dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) inhibitory fluoropyrimidine, were compared with those of protracted venous infusion (PVI) of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). In all, 10 patients with gastric cancer received PVI of 5-FU at a dose of 250 mg m(-2) day(-1) for 5 days. After a washout period of 9 days, the patients received two divided doses daily for 28 days. S-1 was administered orally at about 0900 and 1900 hours. The daily dose of S-1 in terms of tegafur was 80 mg day(-1) in patients with a body surface area (BSA) of <1.25 m(2), 100 mg day(-1) in those with a BSA of >or=1.25 m(2) to <1.5 m(2), and 120 mg day(-1) in those with a BSA of >or=1.5 m(2). Plasma concentrations of 5-FU and F-beta-alanine (FBAL) were measured for pharmacokinetic analysis, and the plasma uracil concentration was monitored as a surrogate marker of DPD inhibition (pharmacodynamic analysis) in the same patients on days 1-5 of PVI of 5-FU and on days 1-5 of oral S-1. The area under the curve (AUC(0-10 h)) of 5-FU on day 5 was 728+/-113 ng h ml(-1) for PVI of 5-FU and 1364+/-374 ng h ml(-1) for S-1. The median 5-FU PVI : S-1 ratio of the AUC(0-10 h) of 5-FU was 1.9. The AUC(0-10 h) of FBAL on day 5 of PVI of 5-FU was 9465+/-3225 ng h ml(-1), AUC(0-10 h), as compared with 1725+/-605 ng h ml(-1) on day 5 of S-1 treatment. The AUC(0-10 h) of uracil on day 5 was 252+/-60 ng h ml(-1) with PVI of 5-FU and 12 582+/-3060 ng h ml(-1) with S-1. The AUC(0-10 h) of FBAL was markedly lower and plasma uracil concentrations were significantly higher for S-1 than for PVI of 5-FU, clearly demonstrating the effect of DPD inhibition.     

CPT-11联合草酸铂、5-FU方案二线治疗晚期卵巢癌的临床研究

目的:观察CPT-11联合草酸铂、5-FU作为二线治疗晚期卵巢癌的近期疗效及不良反应。方法:25例晚期卵巢癌一线治疗失败后,行二线化疗。具体方案为草酸铂85mg/m2,iv gtt,d1,8,15;5-FU 600mg/m2,iv gtt d1-5;CPT-11 60mg/m2,iv gtt,d2,9,16。28d为1周期,2个周期后评估疗效及不良反应。结果:可评价疗效25例,其中CR 7例,PR 5例,SD 6例,PD 7例,临床获益率72%。主要不良反应为恶心、呕吐、迟发性腹泻、肝脏损害、神经毒性和骨髓抑制等。结论:CPT-11联合草酸铂、5-FU方案二线治疗晚期卵巢癌有较好的疗效,且不良反应可以耐受。     

周剂量紫杉醇联合低剂量FP方案治疗晚期食管癌46例临床观察

目的　研究周剂量紫杉醇联合低剂量氟脲嘧啶持续滴注及低剂量顺铂治疗晚期食管癌的近期疗效和毒副反应。方法　晚期食管癌 46例 ,紫杉醇 60mg/(m2 ·week) ,静滴 3小时 ,连用 3周 ;5 -FU 2 0 0mg/(m2 ·d) ,持续滴注 ,连用 2 1天 ;PDD 6mg/(m2 ·d) ,静滴 2小时 ,每周 5天连用 3周 ;以上化疗方案每 4周重复。结果　总有效率 67% ,其中CR 0例 ,PR 31例 ,化疗中主要毒性反应表现为骨髓抑制、消化道反应、脱发等 ,神经毒性、过敏反应少 ,患者耐受性好。结论　紫杉醇作为一种新型抗肿瘤药 ,周剂量使用与低剂量 5-FU持续滴注及低剂量PDD联合 ,对晚期食管癌近期效果显著 ,毒性反应小 ,值得推广     

A phase I study of the trinuclear platinum compound,BBR 3464, in combination with protracted venous infusional 5-fluorouracil in patients with advanced cancer

Purpose BBR 3464 is a novel trinuclear platinum anticancer agent with a broad spectrum of preclinical antitumour activity. A phase I, open-label dose-escalating study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BBR 3464 administered in combination with protracted venous infusional (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) for up to six courses in patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic cancer.Methods Dose escalation was based on observation of toxicity at each dose level. BBR 3464 (0.6 mg/m² escalated to 0.75 mg/m²) was studied in combination with PVI 5-FU (200 mg/m² per day).Results Entered into the study were 14 patients. The most frequent toxicities were nausea, neutropenia, fatigue and diarrhoea. The protocol-defined MTD was not determined as 11/14 patients experienced grade 3 or 4 neutropenia that interrupted the planned administration of PVI 5-FU on day 15 (of 21). Although these events were not dose-limiting, as defined in the protocol, they imposed limitations on the dose of PVI 5-FU administered. Antitumour activity was observed: a partial response in one patient (7%) with invasive breast cancer. Stable disease was confirmed in three patients (21%). These four patients all completed the planned six courses of combined therapy.Conclusions In light of the lack of septic events associated with the recorded neutropenia, it may be possible to safely continue PVI 5-FU despite the grade 3 or 4 neutropenia or modify the PVI schedule and administer therapy on days 1–15 of the 21-day cycle, but these modifications were not considered in this study.     

Phase II trial of fortnightly irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of colorectal cancer patients resistant to previous fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy

Introduction This phase II study investigated the anti-tumour activity and toxicity of CPT-11 (250 mg/m2 i.v. infusion over 60 minutes) administered every 2 weeks as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Material and methods Patients (n=63) with histology diagnosis of advanced CRC and proven resistance to previous fluoropyrimidine therapy were enrolled. Results A total of 510 CPT-11 cycles were administered, with a mean of 8 cycles per patient (range: 1–32). The median relative dose intensity was 93%. Partial response (PR) was obtained in 11 patients (17.5%; 95%CI: 8.1%–26.7%) and 29 patients (46.0%) showed stable disease (clinical benefit of 63.5%). The median duration of response was 6.8 months (95%CI: 6.1–7.5 months), median survival was 8.8 months (95%CI: 6.3–11.5 months) and median time to disease progression was 4.5 months (95%CI: 3.9–5.0 months). Overall, this schedule of CPT-11 chemotherapy was well tolerated by the patient. Neutropenia was the most frequent grade 3/4 haematological toxicity (20.6% of patients and 4.1% of cycles). Neutropenia with concurrent fever or infection occurred in 7 patients (11.1%). Late onset diarrhoea was the most frequent grade 3/4 non-haematological toxicity (19.0% of patients and 2.3% of cycles). Other, lower-incidence, toxicities were anaemia, fever, infection, mucositis, nausea and vomiting. There were no toxic deaths. Conclusions We found that CPT-11, administered as 250 mg/m² i.v. infusion over 60 minutes every 2 weeks, was active and well tolerated schedule in the second-line chemotherapy of advanced CRC patients. This bi-weekly scheme could be used as an alternative to the weekly or the every-three-week schedule as well as in combined therapies with other chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of advanced, metastatic, CRC.     

Docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil in patients with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer: a phase I-II feasibility study.

PURPOSE: To determine the safety profile and activity of the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in chemotherapy-naive patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with locally advanced unresectable SCCHN were treated with docetaxel and cisplatin both as a 1-h infusion on day 1 followed by a continuous infusion of 5-FU for 5 days. Cycles were planned every 3 weeks up to four cycles, whereafter the patients were treated with locoregional radiotherapy. Two dose levels were studied. Doses in level I were 75 mg/m(2) of docetaxel, 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin and 750 mg/m(2)/day of 5-FU; in level II the cisplatin dose was escalated to 100 mg/m(2). Following chemotherapy, all patients were to receive curative radiotherapy according to the standards in the different institutions. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were treated at dose level I with 86 cycles (median four; range one to four), and 23 at dose level II with 84 cycles (median four; range two to four). The median relative dose intensity was 0.99 (range 0.86-1.04) at level I and 0.94 (range 0.79-1.02) at level II. The response rate in the intention-to-treat population was 64% [95% confidence interval (CI) 42.5% to 82%] in level I and 78.3% (95% CI 56.3% to 92.5%) in level II; all were partial responses. The maximum tolerated dose was reached at level II with renal toxicity, nausea, stomatitis and thrombocytopenia as principal dose-limiting toxicities. The median survival of the 48 patients was 18.5 months. The survival at 12, 18, 24 and 30 months was 69, 54, 41 and 31%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-FU associated with prophylactic ciprofloxacin is feasible and active in patients with SCCHN. Dose level I is recommended for phase III testing.     

Cisplatin and protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (CF) -- good symptom relief with low toxicity in advanced pancreatic carcinoma

Purpose: The combination of protracted venous infusion (PVI)5-FU with moderate dose cisplatin was evaluated in patientswith advanced pancreatic cancer Patients and methods: Sixty-three patients with locally advancedor metastatic disease were treated with cisplatin (60 mg/m²every 21 days) and PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m²/day) for a maximum of24 weeks. All patients had histologkally/ cytologically confirmedtumour. Radiological response was assessed by CT scanning andtoxicity, performance status and symptomatic response were assessed3 weekly Results: The objective response rate was 16% with two radiologicalcomplete responses. The median survival was 7.6 months witha 1-year survival of 33% and a median progression-free survivalof 6.6 months. Patients who had local disease only had a mediansurvival of 14.8 months with a 1-year survival of 52%. Thirty-fourpercent of patients had an improvement in performance statuson treatment and specific symptom response rates were weightloss 71%, dysphagia 100%, nausea and vomiting 70%, pain 60%,anorexia 50% and reflux 81%. Chemotherapy was well toleratedwith grade 3 or 4 toxicity being nausea/vomiting 5%, diarrhoea7%, infection 4%, stomatitis 2%, plantar palmar syndrome 2%,anaemia 14%, leucopenia 5%, neutro-penia 10% and thrombocytopenia8% Conclusions: The CF regimen provides good symptomatic palliationwith low toxicity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer pancreatic cancer, 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin     

A randomised study of protracted venous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with or without bolus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with carcinoma of unknown primary

No standard regimen has been identified for patients with a carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). This study compared protracted venous infusion 5-fluorouracil (PVI 5-FU) with or without mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with CUP in a multicentre, prospectively randomised study. 88 patients were randomised to PVI 5-FU (300 mg/m(2)/day for a maximum of 24 weeks) +/-MMC (7 mg/m(2) 6 weekly for four courses). The overall response rate was 11.6% for PVI 5-FU alone compared with 20.0% for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.29). Median failure-free survival (FFS) was 4.1 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.6 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P=0.78) with an equivalent overall survival (OS) (6.6 versus 4.7 months, P=0.60). Symptomatic benefit was observed in most patients in each arm. PVI 5-FU is a well tolerated outpatient treatment regimen for patients with CUP, although the addition of MMC provides little extra benefit. PVI 5-FU may be a potential reference regimen in randomised trials with newer chemotherapy agents in patients with CUP.     

A multicentre, randomised phase III trial comparing protracted venous infusion (PVI) 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C in patients with inoperable oesophago-gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: This randomised study compared protracted venous infusion (PVI) fluorouracil (5-FU) with PVI 5-FU plus mitomycin C (MMC) in patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred and fifty-four patients with adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma or undifferentiated carcinoma involving the oesophagus, oesophago-gastric junction or the stomach were randomised. The major end points were tumour response, survival, toxicity and quality of life. RESULTS: The median age of patients treated was 72 years and the two arms were well-balanced for baseline demographic factors. The overall response rate was 16.1% [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.5% to 22.7%] in patients treated with PVI 5-FU alone compared with 19.1% (95% CI 12.0% to 26.0%) for those treated with PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.555). Median time to treatment failure was 3.9 months for PVI 5-FU and 3.8 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 0.195). Median survival was 6.3 months for PVI 5-FU and 5.3 months for PVI 5-FU plus MMC (P = 1.0).Toxicity was mild for both treatments. Symptomatic benefit measured by improvement in pain control, weight loss, dysphagia and oesophageal reflux was observed in over 64% of patients in each arm. Quality of life scores were comparable in each arm. CONCLUSIONS: PVI 5-FU is a safe, effective form of palliation for patients with advanced oesophago-gastric cancer although the addition of MMC adds little extra benefit.     

Weekly gemcitabine and 24-hour infusional 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase I-II study

OBJECTIVE: In this phase I-II study we explored the potential of the combination of weekly gemcitabine (GEM) and 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in order to determine the toxicity profile in pancreatic cancer. The efficacy of this drug combination was studied as a secondary endpoint. METHODS: Twenty-one patients with histologically or cytologically proven unresectable or metastatic previously untreated pancreatic adenocarcinoma were included in this study. Two dose levels of GEM and two dose levels of 5-FU were evaluated in three cohorts of patients who received GEM 1,000 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,000 mg/m(2), or GEM 1,200 mg/m(2) and 5-FU 2,250 mg/m(2), on days 1, 8, and 15, every 4 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Grade 3-4 neutropenia was observed in 10% of the cycles. Non-myelosuppressive toxicities included fatigue (22%), grade 1-2 diarrhea (12%) and grade 1 liver toxicity. There was no limiting toxicity and the maximum tolerated dose has not been reached. Two patients experienced a partial response (9.5 +/- 12.6%) and 12 patients had stable disease (57.1 +/- 21.2%). Seven of the 14 symptomatic patients improved their disease-related symptoms and 4 of the 8 patients evaluable for clinical benefit had a clinically beneficial response (50 +/- 34.6%). The median progression-free survival was 6 months (range 2-28), median survival was 11 months (range 3-32+), and the actuarial 1-year survival rate 33%. CONCLUSION: The weekly administration of GEM combined with 24-hour continuous infusion of 5-FU shows a good safety profile at the dose levels evaluated. Some partial responses had also been achieved, disregarding the dose level of the two drugs. Survival confirms the activity of this drug combination.     

奥沙利铂联合氟尿嘧啶及甲酰四氢叶酸治疗晚期大肠癌近期疗效分析

目的 :评价国产奥沙利铂 (oxaliplatin ,L OHP)联合氟尿嘧啶及甲酰四氢叶酸 (CF)治疗大肠癌的疗效和毒副反应。方法 :2 8例晚期大肠癌患者 ,予国产L OHP 12 0mg/m2 ,静脉滴入 ,持续 2h ;CF 15 0mg/m2 ,静脉滴入 ,持续 2h ;5 -氟尿嘧啶 ( 5 FU ) 5 0 0mg/m2 ,静脉滴入 ,持续 >4h ,于CF滴完后用。每 3周重复 1次 ,用药 2个周期后评价疗效。结果 :2 8例患者中 ,无完全缓解 (CR) ,部分缓解 (PR) 9例 ,稳定 (SD) 12例 ,进展 (PD) 7例 ,总有效率(RR ,CR PR) 3 2 1% ( 9/2 8) ,中位无进展生存期 6 7个月 ,中位生存期 9 8个月。毒副反应主要是末梢神经毒性、恶心呕吐、骨髓抑制及静脉炎等 ,患者均可耐受。结论 :国产L OHP联合 5 FU /CF治疗晚期大肠癌具有较好的疗效     

Phase II study of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine the activity of the combination of cisplatin, gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as therapy for metastatic or locally advanced inoperable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with histologically proven advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma received first-line chemotherapy comprising cisplatin (20 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36), gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 29 and 36) and 5-FU (200 mg/m2 as continuous infusion on days 1-42) every 56 days. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were studied. Eighty courses were administered (median two courses per patient). Among 32 patients evaluable for response, two patients had a complete response and four a partial response for an overall response rate of 19% (95% confidence interval 7% to 36%). Thirteen patients had stable disease (40%) and 13 progressed. Median progression-free survival was 4.7 months, median survival 9.0 months and 26% of patients achieved 1-year survival. Ten of 25 patients (40%) with pain at presentation had a sustained reduction of analgesic consumption. The principal grade 3/4 toxicities were neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anaemia and mucositis, occurring in 24%, 21%, 9% and 3% of patients. CONCLUSION: This schedule seems well tolerated and active in pancreatic cancer and worthwhile of further evaluation.     

Irinotecan in combination with 5-fluorouracil and folinic acid or with cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric or esophageal-gastric junction adenocarcinoma: results of a randomized phase II study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the most effective of two combinations, irinotecan/5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/folinic acid (FA) and irinotecan/cisplatin, in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer, for investigation in a phase III trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive irinotecan [80 mg/m2 intravenously (i.v.)], FA (500 mg/m2 i.v.) and a 22-h infusion of 5-FU (2000 mg/m2 i.v.), weekly for 6 weeks with a 1-week rest, or irinotecan (200 mg/m2 i.v.) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2 i.v.), on day 1 for 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were eligible for analysis in the per-protocol population. The overall response rate in the irinotecan/5-FU/FA arm (n=59) was 42.4%, with a complete response rate of 5.1%. Corresponding figures for the irinotecan/cisplatin arm (n=56) were 32.1% and 1.8%, respectively. The median time to progression was 6.5 months (irinotecan/5-FU/FA) and 4.2 months (irinotecan/cisplatin) (P < 0.0001), with median survival times of 10.7 and 6.9 months, respectively (P=0.0018). The major toxicity was grade 3/4 neutropenia, which was more pronounced with irinotecan/cisplatin than with irinotecan/5-FU/FA (65.7% versus 27%). Diarrhea was the main grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity with both irinotecan/5-FU/FA (27.0%) and irinotecan/cisplatin (18.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Both combinations were active, with acceptable safety profiles. Irinotecan/5-FU/FA was selected as the most effective combination for investigation in a phase III trial in advanced gastric cancer.