Impact of preventing exacerbations on deterioration of health status in COPD.

Exacerbations of chronic obstuctive pulmonary disease (COPD) are associated with worse health status. The Inhaled Steroids in Obstructive Lung Disease in Europe (ISOLDE) study showed that treatment with fluticasone propionate (FP) reduced exacerbation frequency and the rate of deterioration in health status as compared with placebo. The present study analysed these data to test whether the effect of FP on health status was attributable to its effect on exacerbations. Rates of deterioration in St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score were obtained for 613 patients with moderate to severe COPD followed for a maximum of 3 yrs. Exacerbation rates were skewed and could not be normalised, therefore, patients were stratified into three exacerbation groups: none, infrequent (<1.65 exacerbations x yr(-1)) and frequent (>1.65 exacerbations x yr(-1)). There were 91 patients with no exacerbations, 285 with infrequent exacerbations and 235 with frequent exacerbations. Frequent exacerbations were independently associated with a worse baseline SGRQ score (p<0.0001) and a more rapid rate of deterioration in health status (p=0.0003). Exacerbation frequency and rate of decline in forced expiratory volume in one second were independently related to the rate of deterioration in SGRQ score. Statistical modelling showed the beneficial effect of fluticasone propionate on deterioration in health status to be largely due to its effect on exacerbation frequency.     

Longitudinal changes in the nature, severity and frequency of COPD exacerbations.

Exacerbations are an important feature and outcome measure in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but little is known about changes in their severity, recovery, symptom composition or frequency over time. In this study 132 patients (91 male; median age 68.4 yrs and median forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 38.4% predicted) recorded daily symptoms and morning peak expiratory flow. Patients were monitored for a median of 918 days and 1,111 exacerbations were identified. Patients with severe COPD (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) category III, n=38) had an annual exacerbation frequency of 3.43 x yr(-1), 0.75 x yr(-1) higher than those with moderate COPD (GOLD II, n=94). Exacerbation frequency did not change significantly during the study. At exacerbation onset, symptom count increased to 2.23, relative to a baseline of 0.36 set 8-14 days previously, and this increase rose by 0.05 x yr(-1). Recovery to baseline levels in symptoms and FEV1 took longer (0.32 and 0.55 days x yr(-1)). Sputum purulence at exacerbation became more prevalent over time by 4.1% x yr(-1) from an initial value of 17%. The results of this study suggest that over time, individual patients have more symptoms during exacerbations, with an increased chance of sputum purulence and longer recovery times.     

Effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol (250/50 microg) or salmeterol (50 microg) on COPD exacerbations

OBJECTIVES: COPD exacerbations are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter study evaluated the effect of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 and salmeterol 50 microg twice daily on moderate to severe exacerbations. METHODS: Patients received standardized treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 during a 1-month run-in, followed by randomization to fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 or salmeterol for 12 months. Moderate to severe exacerbations were defined as worsening symptoms of COPD requiring treatment with oral corticosteroids, antibiotics, or hospitalization. RESULTS: In 782 patients with COPD (mean FEV(1)=0.94+/-0.36 L, 33% predicted normal), treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 significantly reduced (1) the annual rate of moderate to severe exacerbations by 30.5% compared with salmeterol (1.06 and 1.53 per subject per year, respectively, p<0.001), (2) the risk of time to first exacerbation by 25% (hazard ratio=0.750, p=0.003) and (3) the annual rate of exacerbations requiring oral corticosteroids by 40% (p<0.001). Clinical improvements observed during run-in treatment with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 were better maintained over 12 months with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol. Adverse events were reported for a similar percentage of subjects across groups. A higher reporting of pneumonia was observed with fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 than salmeterol (7% vs. 4%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 is more effective than salmeterol at reducing the rate of moderate to severe exacerbations over 1 year. The benefits of this reduction relative to the risk of a higher incidence of reported pneumonia should be considered. This study supports the use of fluticasone propionate/salmeterol 250/50 for the reduction of COPD exacerbations in patients with COPD.     

Health status deterioration in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

This study examined health status decline in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Data are from the Inhaled Steroids in Obstructive Lung Disease (ISOLDE) trial. After an 8-wk run-in, 751 patients (566 male), mean age 64 yr, were randomized to receive fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 microg twice daily (376 patients) or placebo (375 patients). Mean baseline postbronchodilator FEV1 was 50 +/- 15% predicted. Patients completed the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) at baseline and every 6 mo for 3 yr. FEV1 and smoking status were assessed at baseline and at 3-mo intervals. A total of 387 (212 FP) patients completed the trial. All SGRQ components (p = 0.03 to 0.004) and Physical Function, Mental Health, Energy/ Vitality, and Physical Role Limitation scales of the SF-36 (p = 0.05 to 0.005) deteriorated faster in the placebo group. FEV1 and SGRQ scores correlated at baseline values (r = -0.25, p < 0.0001), as did change in FEV1 and change in SGRQ (Delta r = -0.24, p < 0.0001). At baseline values smokers had worse SGRQ Total, Symptoms, and Impacts scores than ex-smokers. This difference was maintained throughout the study. Smoking status did not influence the rate of decline in health status. The SGRQ Total scores of FP-treated patients took 59% longer than placebo to deteriorate by a clinically significant amount. We conclude that health status decline in moderate to severe COPD can be reduced by high-dose fluticasone.     

The TORCH (towards a revolution in COPD health) survival study protocol.

Only long-term home oxygen therapy has been shown in randomised controlled trials to increase survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). There have been no trials assessing the effect of inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting bronchodilators, alone or in combination, on mortality in patients with COPD, despite their known benefit in reducing symptoms and exacerbations. The "TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health" (TORCH) survival study is aiming to determine the impact of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate (SFC) combination and the individual components on the survival of COPD patients. TORCH is a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study. Approximately 6,200 patients with moderate-to-severe COPD were randomly assigned to b.i.d. treatment with either SFC (50/500 microg), fluticasone propionate (500 microg), salmeterol (50 microg) or placebo for 3 yrs. The primary end-point is all-cause mortality; secondary end-points are COPD morbidity relating to rate of exacerbations and health status, using the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire. Other end-points include other mortality and exacerbation end-points, requirement for long-term oxygen therapy, and clinic lung function. Safety end-points include adverse events, with additional information on bone fractures. The first patient was recruited in September 2000 and results should be available in 2006. This paper describes the "TOwards a Revolution in COPD Health" study and explains the rationale behind it.     

The effect of tiotropium on exacerbations and airflow in patients with COPD.

This randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, 1-yr study compared the effect of tiotropium 18 microg once daily (n=500) and placebo (n=510) on exacerbations, associated health resource use (HRU) and airflow limitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The mean+/-sd number of exacerbations during the past year was 2.14+/-1.40, the mean weekly morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) was 259.6+/-96.1 L.min-1 and the mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 1.37+/-0.45 L. Tiotropium significantly delayed the time to first exacerbation by approximately 100 days, reduced the proportion of patients experiencing more than one exacerbation by 17%, and decreased the number of exacerbations by 35% and exacerbation days by 37% versus placebo. Tiotropium also decreased HRU versus placebo, as indicated by the significant reductions in the use of concomitant respiratory medications, antibiotics and oral steroids, and the number of unscheduled physician contacts. Mean weekly morning PEF improved significantly with tiotropium versus placebo from week 1 until the end of the study. At the end of the study, tiotropium significantly improved trough (pre-dose) FEV1, forced vital capacity, slow vital capacity and inspiratory capacity versus placebo. In conclusion, tiotropium reduced exacerbations and associated health resource use, and improved airflow over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.     

Efficacy of nebulized flunisolide combined with salbutamol and ipratropium bromide in stable patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of nebulized corticosteroids in the prevention of exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been poorly studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of nebulized flunisolide (1 mg) + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide (1,875/375 microg) b.i.d. in comparison with placebo + salbutamol/ipratropium bromide. METHODS: This was a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind study on 114 patients with COPD of moderate-to-severe degree. The main outcome was the frequency of severe exacerbations over a 6-month period. Before and after treatment, respiratory symptoms, forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)), shuttle walking test distance and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire scores were evaluated. RESULTS: The total number of exacerbations was slightly lower in the flunisolide group compared to the placebo group (19 vs. 34, p = 0.054); the number of patients experiencing at least one exacerbation during the study was also decreased (16 vs. 26, p = 0.059). In particular, type 3 Anthonisens's exacerbations were significantly reduced by flunisolide (p = 0.044). In the placebo group, scores were higher than in the flunisolide group but nonsignificant for dyspnea, cough, sputum amount and purulence. FEV(1) was significantly increased compared to baseline in both groups, and the area under the FEV(1)-time curve during the 6-month period was significantly greater in the flunisolide group (5.2 +/- 10.6 vs. 2.1 +/- 5.0, flunisolide vs. placebo, respectively; p = 0.047). For shuttle walking test distance and scores of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, no significant difference between the baseline evaluation and the end of the study was observed in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Nebulized flunisolide is a good alternative to other inhaled corticosteroids when added to nebulized salbutamol/ipratropium bromide in the long-term treatment of moderate-to-severe COPD patients.     

Effect of discontinuation of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the COPE study

The aim of this double-blind single center study (the COPE study) was to investigate the effect of discontinuation of the inhaled corticosteroid fluticasone propionate (FP) on exacerbations and health-related quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. After 4 months of treatment with FP (1,000 microg/day), 244 patients were randomized to either continue FP or to receive placebo for 6 months: 123 patients continued FP (FP group), and 121 received placebo (placebo group). In the FP group, 58 (47%) patients developed at least one exacerbation compared with 69 (57%) in the placebo group. The hazard ratio of a first exacerbation in the placebo group compared with the FP group was 1.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-2.1). In the placebo group 26 patients (21.5%) experienced rapid recurrent exacerbations and were subsequently unblinded and prescribed FP compared with 6 patients (4.9%) in the FP group (relative risk = 4.4; 95% CI 1.9-10.3). Over a 6-month period, a significant difference in favor of the FP group was observed in the total score (+2.48 95% CI 0.37-4.58), activity domain (+4.64 95% CI 1.60-7.68), and symptom domain (+4.58 95% CI 1.05-8.10) of the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire. This study indicates that discontinuation of FP in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is associated with a more rapid onset and higher recurrence-risk of exacerbations and a significant deterioration in aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life.     

Effect of Aclidinium Bromide on Exacerbations in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe COPD: A Pooled Analysis of Five Phase III,Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Studies

We investigated the effect of the long-acting muscarinic antagonist aclidinium bromide on chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbations by pooling data from five randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group Phase III studies of 3–6 months’ duration. Data were pooled from the aclidinium 400 μg twice-daily (BID) and placebo arms (N = 2,521) and stratified by Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) group (A, B, C and D). Results showed that fewer patients experienced ≥1 exacerbation with aclidinium (any severity: 12.5%; moderate to severe: 10.9%) compared with placebo (any severity: 15.7%; moderate to severe: 13.3%) and the odds of experiencing ≥1 exacerbation of any severity were reduced in patients receiving aclidinium (odds ratio = 0.78, p = 0.039). Furthermore, aclidinium reduced the rate of exacerbations compared with placebo (any severity: rate ratio = 0.79, p = 0.026; moderate to severe: 0.80, p = 0.044). The time to first exacerbation of any severity was delayed with aclidinium compared with placebo (hazard ratio = 0.79, p = 0.026) and there was a numerical delay in time to first moderate-to-severe exacerbation. Finally, the effects of aclidinium on exacerbations versus placebo were greater in patients in GOLD Groups B and D; however, it is of note that only 10.7% of patients were classified in Group A or C. In summary, the results indicate that aclidinium 400 μg BID reduces the frequency of COPD exacerbations compared with placebo and that these effects are greater in symptomatic patients.     

Comparison of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler and Fluticasone Propionate Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients with Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma Requiring High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy: Findings from a Noninferiority Trial

Background. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are one of the suggested first-line therapies for patients with persistent asthma of moderate severity. Methods: The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (MF) 400 μg twice daily (BID) and fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 μ g BID administered for 12 weeks via dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared in a noninferiority trial, in adults with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. The primary variable was the change from baseline in am peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). pm PEFR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, and adverse events were also assessed. Results. The lower bound of 95% CIs for treatment differences in the primary variable ranged from 2.6% to 5.6% throughout the 12-week study and were within the prespecified noninferiority range. No significant between-group differences were observed in lung function, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, or adverse events. At most of the weeks assessed, there were no between-group differences in asthma symptoms. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate. Conclusion. MF-DPI 400 μ g BID was therapeutically equivalent to FP-DPI 500 μ g BID in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.     

Cost-effectiveness of fluticasone propionate in the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind randomized,placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a debilitating disease and places a large financial burden on health-care systems and society.We prospectively evaluated the cost-effectiveness offluticasone propionate (FP) treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, who were symptomatic on regular bronchodilator therapy. METHODS: An economic analysis was performed in a 6-month, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing FP 1,000 microg/day with placebo in 281 patients aged 45-79 years with symptomatic moderate-to-severe COPD. Data on clinical efficacy, health-care resource use and productivity loss associated with the management of COPD were prospectively collected. The main outcome measures were the incremental cost-effectiveness of achieving a > or = 10% improvement in FEV1 and of remaining exacerbation-free throughout the study.The economic evaluation was costed from the perspective of the NHS (direct costs) and of society (direct and indirect costs). RESULTS: FP was significantly more effective than placebo in terms of the proportions of patients demonstrating a > or = 10% improvement in FEV1 (32 vs. 19%; P = 0.02) and remaining free of moderate/severe exacerbations (75 vs. 63%; P = 0.02).The difference between the groups in total costs was not significantly different. Incremental cost-effectiveness analyses showed that the additional clinical benefits of FP relativeto placebo, in terms of a > or = 10% improvement in FEV1 or an increased number of patients free of moderate/severe exacerbations, were achieved at minimal additional costs from an NHS perspective (additional 0.25 pounds per day for bath) or at a net saving from a societal perspective. Sensitivity analysis showed that these results were robust to changes in the underlying assumptions. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with FP was associated with statistically significant clinical benefits in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD currently symptomatic on regular bronchodilator therapy. As the differences in direct and total costs compared with placebo were small and non-significant, this treatment can be considered cost-effective in this patient population.     

Comparison of Mometasone Furoate Dry Powder Inhaler and Fluticasone Propionate Dry Powder Inhaler in Patients with Moderate to Severe Persistent Asthma Requiring High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroid Therapy: Findings from a Noninferiority Trial

Background. Inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) are one of the suggested first-line therapies for patients with persistent asthma of moderate severity. Methods: The efficacy and safety of mometasone furoate (MF) 400 μg twice daily (BID) and fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 μ g BID administered for 12 weeks via dry powder inhaler (DPI) were compared in a noninferiority trial, in adults with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma. The primary variable was the change from baseline in am peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR). pm PEFR, forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV₁), asthma symptoms, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, and adverse events were also assessed. Results. The lower bound of 95% CIs for treatment differences in the primary variable ranged from 2.6% to 5.6% throughout the 12-week study and were within the prespecified noninferiority range. No significant between-group differences were observed in lung function, rescue medication use, response to therapy, exacerbation rates, or adverse events. At most of the weeks assessed, there were no between-group differences in asthma symptoms. Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate. Conclusion. MF-DPI 400 μ g BID was therapeutically equivalent to FP-DPI 500 μ g BID in patients with moderate-to-severe persistent asthma.     

Effect of 1-year treatment with roflumilast in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

RATIONALE: The oral phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitor, roflumilast, can improve lung function in moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether treatment is effective in more severe COPD (GOLD [Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease] stages III and IV) over a longer period is unknown. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether roflumilast improves lung function and decreases exacerbation frequency over 1 year in patients with stable COPD. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group trial for 1 year. We recruited 1,513 patients (mean post-bronchodilator FEV1 41% predicted), 760 receiving oral 500 microg roflumilast and 753 receiving placebo once daily. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We recorded post-bronchodilator FEV1, exacerbation rate, St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score at the study end point, and number and type of reported adverse events during treatment. Post-bronchodilator FEV1 increased by 39 ml with roflumilast compared with placebo by 52 weeks (p=0.001). The mean exacerbation rate was low and comparable in both treatment groups (0.86 vs. 0.92 exacerbations/patient/yr for roflumilast and placebo, respectively). In a retrospective analysis, the exacerbation rate in patients in GOLD stage IV disease was 36% lower in patients treated with roflumilast than in those treated with placebo (1.01 vs. 1.59 exacerbations/patient/year, respectively; p=0.024). The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire total score did not differ between treatments. The commonest adverse events related to roflumilast treatment were diarrhea, nausea, and headache, which usually subsided during continued treatment. However, roflumilast resulted in more withdrawals within the first 3 to 4 weeks of administration. CONCLUSIONS: In severe, stable COPD, PDE4 inhibition with roflumilast produced a modest but significant improvement in lung function without changing the exacerbation rate or health status. However, patients with very severe disease experienced fewer exacerbations with roflumilast.     

Children with mild asthma: do they benefit from inhaled corticosteroids?

In children with mild asthma, who show hardly any abnormalities in pulmonary function, objective measurement of the effect of inhaled corticosteroids is difficult. The short term effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) in these children was evaluated, using both subjective and objective parameters. A total of 68 children (5-10 yrs old) were randomly assigned to either FP 250 microg or placebo twice daily as metered-dose inhaler via spacer during 12 weeks. Symptom scores, use of rescue medication, wheezing, parent global evaluation and pulmonary function tests including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), peak expiratory flow (PEF) and bronchial responsiveness (provocation dose of methacholine causing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20)) were evaluated. FP-treated versus placebo-treated children showed significant changes in percentage symptom-free days, use of beta2-mimetics, morning and evening PEF, FEV1 % pred and wheezing. No significant improvements were found in parent global evaluation, absolute values of FEV1 nor PD20. These findings show that inhaled corticosteroids are effective in children with mild asthma. This effect can be assessed by both objective and subjective parameters. Early start of inhaled corticosteroids should be considered even when pulmonary function is normal.     

The effects of inhaled fluticasone on airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a double-blind,placebo-controlled biopsy study

Inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) are effective in the treatment of asthma and markedly reduce the numbers of inflammatory cells in bronchial biopsies. However, the effect of ICS on the inflammatory profile of biopsies in smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown. We have performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study to compare fluticasone propionate (FP) 500 microg twice daily via a dry powder inhaler and placebo (P) over a 3-month period in subjects with COPD. Fiberoptic bronchoscopy and bronchial biopsy was carried out at baseline and after the 3 months of treatment. Thirty-one subjects completed the trial and 30 paired biopsies were available for analysis. Compared with P (n = 14), subjects on inhaled FP (n = 16) had no significant reductions in the primary endpoints: CD8+, CD68+ cells, or neutrophils, considered to be of importance in COPD. However, there was a reduction in the CD8:CD4 ratio in the epithelium and of the numbers of subepithelial mast cells in the FP group. CD4+ cells were significantly raised in the P group in both subepithelium and epithelium. Symptoms significantly improved, and there were significantly fewer exacerbations in subjects on FP, compared to subjects on P. The data indicate that inhaled fluticasone does affect selected aspects of airway inflammation in COPD, and this may explain, in part, the decrease in exacerbations seen in long-term studies with fluticasone propionate.     

Controlled short-term trial of fluticasone propionate in ventilator-dependent patients with COPD

BACKGROUND: There is no agreement about the efficacy of systemic corticosteroids in patients with COPD, but corticosteroids often are employed during exacerbations of the disease. The use of systemic or inhaled corticosteroids in patients in stable condition is even more controversial, even though the more severely affected patients seem to respond better. Unfortunately, in this subset of patients, the use of forced expiratory maneuvers frequently fails to detect significant functional response. Study objectives: We evaluated the short-term effects of an inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), on FEV(1) and on the mechanical properties of patients in stable condition with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure who were receiving long-term ventilatory support. This allowed us to measure respiratory mechanics (RM) passively, thereby avoiding any problems linked with voluntary maneuvers. DESIGN: Randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study. SETTING: A respiratory ICU. PATIENTS: Twelve hypercapnic COPD patients (mean [+/- SD] PaCO(2), 60+/-11 mm Hg; mean FEV(1), 13+/-5% predicted; and mean FEV(1)/FVC, 31 +/- 7%) were enrolled. INTERVENTIONS: A daily dose of 2,000 microg FP or placebo was administered via metered-dose inhaler during mechanical ventilation for 5 consecutive days. A washout of 72 h was allowed between regimens. MEASUREMENTS: End-expiratory and end-inspiratory airway occlusions were performed to assess static intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi,st), static compliance of the respiratory system (Cst,rs), maximal respiratory resistance (Rmax, rs), and minimal respiratory resistance (Rmin,rs). The bronchodilator response also was assessed by FEV(1) level. RESULTS: No significant changes were found in RM after administration of the placebo. By day 6, FP had induced the following significant decreases: PEEPi,st, 4.3+/-2.4 to 3.1+/-1.7 cm H(2)O (p<0.01); Rmax,rs, 19.0+/-6.5 to 14.6+/-6 cm H(2)O/L/s (p<0.001); and Rmin,rs, 14.8+/-4.2 to 10.5+/-3.4 cm H(2)O/L/s (p<0.001). The Cst,rs and the effective additional resistance of the respiratory system did not change significantly, the latter suggesting that the major effect of FP was on the airway caliber (Rmin,rs). FEV(1) changes significantly (p<0.01) underestimated the bronchodilator response, as compared with changes in Rmin,rs. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that in patients in stable condition with severe COPD and chronic hypercapnic respiratory failure, a brief trial of FP may induce a bronchodilator response, mainly related to a reduction in airway resistances, that is not detected by the usual pulmonary function tests.     

Classification of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) according to the new Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) 2017: Comparison with GOLD 2011

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) project has been working to improve awareness, prevention and management of this disease. The aim of this study is to evaluate how COPD patients are reclassified by the 2017 GOLD system (versus GOLD 2011), to calculate the level of agreement between these two classifications in allocation to categories and to compare the performance of each classification to predict future exacerbations. Two-hundred COPD patients (>40 years, post bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity<0.7) followed in pulmonology consultation were recruited into this prospective multicentric study. Approximately half of the patients classified as GOLD D [2011] changed to GOLD B [2017]. The extent of agreement between GOLD 2011 and GOLD 2017 was moderate (Cohen's Kappa = 0.511; p < 0.001) and the ability to predict exacerbations was similar (69.7% and 67.6%, respectively). GOLD B [2017] exacerbated 17% more than GOLD B [2011] and had a lower percent predicted post bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1). GOLD B [2017] turned to be the predominant category, more heterogeneous and with a higher risk of exacerbation versus GOLD B [2011]. Physicians should be cautious in assessing the GOLD B [2017] patients. The assessment of patients should always be personalized. More studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the 2017 reclassification in predicting outcomes such as future exacerbations and mortality.     

Salmeterol/fluticasone combination in the treatment of COPD

Clinical trials of a combination therapy of an inhaled corticosteroid, fluticasone propionate (FP), with a long-acting β₂-agonist, salmeterol (Sal), have demonstrated a greater improvement in lung function and in quality of life measures after the combination compared with either component of alone. In a subanalysis of the data of the TRISTAN study, Sal/FP reduced exacerbation rates in COPD patients with a baseline FEV₁<50% of predicted. A combination therapy of budesonide and formoterol improved quality of life and FEV₁, and reduced exacerbations better than either component alone. In studies of FP or of Sal/FP in COPD, there was a reduction in all-cause mortality by 25% relative to placebo. Sal/FP has anti-inflammatory effects in COPD airways. FP inhibits markers of systemic inflammation, and it is not known whether Sal/FP has an advantage over FP alone. While long-acting β₂-agonists such as Sal can be recommended for treatment of moderate COPD, addition of inhaled steroid therapy such as FP should be considered in more severe disease.     

Efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

The efficacy and safety of budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler compared with placebo, budesonide and formoterol were evaluated in patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In a 12-month, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study in 812 adults (mean age 64 yrs, mean forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) 36% predicted normal), patients received two inhalations twice daily of either budesonide/formoterol (Symbicort) 160/4.5 microg (delivered dose), budesonide 200 microg (metered dose), formoterol 4.5 microg or placebo. Severe exacerbations and FEV1 (primary variables), peak expiratory flow (PEF), COPD symptoms, health-related quality of life (HRQL), mild exacerbations, use of reliever beta2-agonist and safety variables were recorded. Budesonide/formoterol reduced the mean number of severe exacerbations per patient per year by 24% versus placebo and 23% versus formoterol. FEV1 increased by 15% versus placebo and 9% versus budesonide. Morning PEF improved significantly on day 1 versus placebo and budesonide; after 1 week, morning PEF was improved versus placebo, budesonide and formoterol. Improvements in morning and evening PEF versus comparators were maintained over 12 months. Budesonide/formoterol decreased all symptom scores and use of reliever beta2-agonists significantly versus placebo and budesonide, and improved HRQL versus placebo. All treatments were well tolerated. These results suggest a role for budesonide/formoterol in the long-term management of moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.