Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the LOTUS Edge System: Early European Experience

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term safety and efficacy of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the LOTUS Edge system.BackgroundThe LOTUS Edge system was commercially re-released in April 2019. The authors report the first European experience with this device.MethodsA multicenter, single-arm, retrospective registry was initiated to evaluate short-term clinical outcomes. Included cases are the first experience with this device and new implantation technique in Europe. Clinical, echocardiographic, and computed tomographic data were analyzed. Endpoints were defined according to Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 and were site reported.ResultsBetween April and November 2019, 286 consecutive patients undergoing TAVR with the LOTUS Edge system at 18 European centers were included. The mean age and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 81.2 ± 6.9 years and 5.2 ± 5.4%, respectively. Nearly one-half of all patients (47.9%) were considered to have complex anatomy. Thirty-day major adverse events included death (2.4% [n = 7]) and stroke (3.5% [n = 10]). After TAVR, the mean aortic valve area was 1.9 ± 0.9 cm², and the mean transvalvular gradient was 11.9 ± 5.7 mm Hg. None or trace paravalvular leak (PVL) occurred in 84.4% and moderate PVL in 2.0%. There were no cases of severe PVL. New permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation was required in 25.9% among all patients and 30.8% among PPM-naive patients.ConclusionsEarly experience with the LOTUS Edge system demonstrated satisfactory short-term safety and efficacy, favorable hemodynamic data, and very low rates of PVL in an anatomically complex cohort. New PPM implantation remained high. Further study will evaluate if increasing operator experience with the device and new implantation technique can reduce the incidence of PPM implantation.     

Early Single-Site Experience With Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Replacement

Objectives

This study presents a single-site experience of 5 patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) who underwent implantation of a novel transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement device.

Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients With Multivalvular Heart Disease

As transcatheter aortic valve replacement becomes a more dominant treatment option across all risk profiles, the frequency of encountering patients with multivalvular disease will increase. Furthermore, percutaneous interventions to treat other valvular lesions are also evolving. Understanding the clinical implications and treatment options for a second valvular lesion is becoming increasingly important to guide heart team decisions, and this paper aims to review the evidence around these situations. Diagnosis of multivalvular disease can be challenging because of changes in physiology. There are little randomized data to guide therapy in multivalvular disease. Multidisciplinary heart team decisions can be invaluable in integrating the plethora of clinical, hemodynamic, and imaging data on which an optimal management strategy can be planned. Prospective studies to assess the role of structural valve interventions in the transcatheter aortic valve replacement era would greatly help improve outcomes for structural heart patients.     

Initial German Experience With Transapical Implantation of a Second-Generation Transcatheter Heart Valve for the Treatment of Aortic Regurgitation

ObjectivesThis analysis reports on the initial German multicenter experience with the JenaValve (JenaValve Technology GmbH, Munich, Germany) transcatheter heart valve for the treatment of pure aortic regurgitation.BackgroundExperience with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for severe aortic regurgitation is limited due to the risk of insufficient anchoring of the valve stent within the noncalcified aortic annulus.MethodsTransapical TAVI with a JenaValve for the treatment of severe aortic regurgitation was performed in 31 patients (age 73.8 ± 9.1 years) in 9 German centers. All patients were considered high risk for surgery (logistic EuroSCORE [European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation] 23.6 ± 14.5%) according to a local heart team consensus. Procedural results and clinical outcomes up to 6 months were analyzed.ResultsImplantation was successful in 30 of 31 cases (aortic annulus diameter 24.7 ± 1.5 mm); transcatheter heart valve dislodgement necessitated valve-in-valve implantation in 1 patient. Post-procedural aortic regurgitation was none/trace in 28 of 31 and mild in 3 of 31 patients. During follow-up, 2 patients underwent valvular reinterventions (surgical aortic valve replacement for endocarditis, valve-in-valve implantation for increasing paravalvular regurgitation). All-cause mortality was 12.9% and 19.3% at 30 days and 6 months, respectively. In the remaining patients, a significant improvement in New York Heart Association class was observed and persisted up to 6 months after TAVI.ConclusionsAortic regurgitation remains a challenging pathology for TAVI. After initial demonstration of feasibility, this multicenter study revealed the JenaValve transcatheter heart valve as a reasonable option in this subset of patients. However, a significant early noncardiac mortality related to the high-risk population emphasizes the need for careful patient selection.     

Transcatheter Aortic Bioprosthesis Durability: A Single-Center Experience

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve implant (TAVI) is gaining momentum in the treatment of severe, symptomatic aortic valve stenosis, and its indication is expanding to lower surgical risk individuals, who are generally younger and have a long life expectancy. Therefore, transcatheter bioprostheses durability appears of critical importance. Aim of the present study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of TAVI in a high-volume single center cohort.MethodsWe analyzed all consecutive patients (n = 408) who underwent transfemoral TAVI at a single, high-volume center, between 2007 and 2014. Study objectives were all-cause death and bioprosthetic valve failure (BVF) at long term follow-up. Structural valve deterioration (SVD), BVF and valve-related death were defined according to current international standards. Follow-up was performed by in person visit and transthoracic echocardiography, which was obtained only in a minority of patients, or phone call as per patient preference.ResultsAt a median follow-up of 1821 days, overall mortality was 64.5%, with cardiovascular disease accounting for roughly half of total deaths. Valve-related deaths occurred in 10 patients. Seventeen patients were diagnosed with BVF, and 15 required repeat intervention. Moderate and severe SVD were observed in 10 and 7 patients, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with echocardiographic mid-term follow-up (n = 76), no significant increase of transprosthetic gradients nor increase of significant regurgitation was detected.ConclusionIn the present unselected, all-comers cohort, TAVI bioprostheses appeared to have excellent durability at long-term follow-up.     

Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Using a Novel Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valve: A Single-Center Experience

ObjectivesEvaluation of 30-day outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the novel balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) emphasizing the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria.BackgroundPreliminary data on clinical performance with the S3 THV are promising. However, information regarding 30-day outcome is limited.MethodsA total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with the S3 THV at our center were enrolled, and outcomes according to VARC-2 criteria were analyzed at 30 days.ResultsThe mean age was 81.0 ± 6.2 years, median logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 12.1% and 4.4%, respectively. VARC-2–defined device success was achieved in 244 patients (97.6%); moderate paravalvular leakage developed in 5 patients (2.0%). One patient (0.4%) died of a noncardiac cause and 8 patients (3.2%) had a stroke. Life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications occurred in 12 (4.8%) and 9 (3.6%) of the patients, respectively. From discharge to 30 days, 5 patients (2.0%) were hospitalized due to valve-related symptoms or worsening of heart failure. The VARC-2 composite early safety endpoint was observed in 25 patients (10.0%). Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at 30 days was 15.2%. Myocardial infarction, coronary obstruction requiring intervention, valve-related dysfunction, and endocarditis were not observed.ConclusionsWe found very good 30-day results using the novel S3 THV with a low rate of clinical events according to VARC-2 criteria. The S3 THV is associated with high procedural success and favorable early safety profile. The need for pacemaker implantations appears to be more frequent than with its predecessor.     

First-in-Human Transcatheter Tricuspid Valve Repair: 30-Day Follow-Up Experience With the Mistral Device

ObjectivesThis study sought to report short-term results of safety, performance, and efficacy of the Mistral device first-in-human study in patients suffering from severe functional tricuspid insufficiency.BackgroundPatients who suffer from severe tricuspid regurgitation (TR) and who are at high surgical risk have no standard care therapy. Therefore, minimally invasive and safer methods are sought. The Mistral device is an investigational spiral-shaped device intended for percutaneous transcatheter repair. The Mistral device approximates the tricuspid leaflets by grasping together the chordae tendineae of the tricuspid valve.MethodsSeven patients (4 women; mean age 73.14 ± 7.4 years) with severe (n = 5) and massive (n = 2) symptomatic TR and high surgical risk underwent Mistral tricuspid repair under transesophageal echocardiography guidance.ResultsMistral was successfully implanted in all cases with a single device deployed in 6 patients, with 2 devices deployed in 1 patient. No procedural or 30-day adverse events occurred. TR was reduced by at least 1 grade in all patients. Effective regurgitant orifice area was reduced from median 0.52 cm² (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.40 to 0.60 cm²) at baseline to 0.15 cm² (IQR: 0.14 to 0.21 cm²) at 30 days post-procedure (p < 0.01), vena contracta width was reduced from 0.95 cm (IQR: 0.81 to 1.16 cm) to 0.62 cm (IQR: 0.52 to 0.67 cm) (p < 0.05), and regurgitant volume decreased from 49.4 ml/beat (IQR: 45.2 to 57.7 ml/beat) to 19.7 ml/beat (IQR: 12.4 to 23.9 ml/beat) (p < 0.01). Right ventricular fractional area change improved from 27.0% (IQR: 21.3% to 33.5%) at baseline to 38.5% (IQR: 29.0% to 47.1%) at 30-day follow-up (p < 0.05). Significant improvements in New York Heart Association functional class, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score, and 6-min walk test were observed at 30 days.ConclusionsTricuspid valve repair with the Mistral device appears safe and leads to 30-day reduction of tricuspid insufficiency and improvement of right ventricular function and exercise capacity.