Stapled explant of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device

Currently the most common indication for placement of a left ventricular assist device is as a bridge to heart transplantation. One of the new generation axial flow left ventricular assist devices is the Jarvik 2000. This device is placed in the apex of the left ventricle and the outflow graft passes through the left pleural space and is anastomosed to the descending thoracic aorta. The course of the outflow graft presents technical challenges during explant for heart transplantation. Opening the posterior pericardium and use of a vascular stapler to control the outflow graft at the level of the descending thoracic aorta facilitates easy explantation.     

Preliminary experience with the LionHeart left ventricular assist device in patients with end-stage heart failure

BACKGROUND: The Arrow LionHeart LVD 2000 left ventricular assist device is the first fully implantable system designed for destination therapy. We report on 2 years of experience with this device, which we implanted for the first time in October 1999. METHODS: Since October 1999, 6 male patients between 55 and 69 years of age (mean 65 +/- 6 years) have received the device at our center; all were in New York Heart Association functional class IV and ineligible for heart transplantation. RESULTS: All surgical procedures were uneventful, with a timely extubation in 5 of 6 patients. Duration of support was 17 to 670 (mean 245 +/- 138) days, with a cumulative experience of 4.5 years. Three patients recovered to be discharged from hospital under support and are long-term survivors. Three patients died 17, 31, and 112 days after implantation from multiple organ failure without being discharged to their homes. The survival rate is 50% after 18 months. There were no major system-related problems or any device-related infections, which are otherwise commonly found among vertricular assist device patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our preliminary experience demonstrates the reliability and efficacy of the different parts of the system. Nevertheless, further sophistication is needed to reduce the size of its components, which so far still constitutes a limiting factor.     

Direct thrombolytic therapy for intraventricular thrombosis in patients with the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device.

One of the complications that can occur with continuous, axial-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is thrombosis within the left ventricle, adjacent to the device's inflow conduit, which may cause inflow obstruction and recurrent heart failure. We describe 2 cases in which we used a catheter to continuously infuse recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) into the left ventricle until signs of successful thrombolysis was achieved. By monitoring the result and administering only as much tPA as necessary to achieve thrombolysis, we were able to successfully lyse the obstructing thrombus with a minimal dose of tPA without causing any significant bleeding problems. This technique may be useful for managing this potentially serious complication while minimizing the risk of treatment.     

The Jarvik 2000 is associated with less infections than the HeartMate left ventricular assist device.

OBJECTIVES: Device-related infections remain a considerable problem of left-ventricular support. We compared the device-related-infections between the HeartMate left ventricular assist device (LVAD) and the Jarvik 2000 permanent LVAD, a device with a novel retroauricular power-supply. METHODS: Between December 2000 and September 2002 we implanted the HeartMate-vented, electrical-system in 11 patients and the permanent Jarvik 2000 in six patients. Total support time was 1626 patient-days (HeartMate, 26-271 days) versus 1246 patient-days (Jarvik 2000, 8-411 days). As potential risk factors for infection we analyzed age, preoperative hospital-days, total protein, cardiac index, maximal oxygen uptake, use of inotropes, LVAD risk-score-index and Aaronson-Mancini-score, intubation time, and intensive care unit stay. We used the Center of Disease Control definitions for surgical site infections. RESULTS: HeartMate-patients were younger than Jarvik 2000 patients (46+/-13 versus 58+/-6 years, P=0.056), there were no other differences in the risk factors. Four HeartMate-patients needed late (>or=48 h) surgical revisions for bleeding/hematomas versus no revisions in the Jarvik 2000 patients. In the HeartMate-patients, there were seven (64%) driveline-infections, five (45%) device-pocket infections, and three (27%) bloodstream-infections, or 0.43 device-related infections/100 patient-days. Infections occurred early (34+/-31 days). Three patients required urgent transplantation due to bloodstream infection. There were no adverse outcomes in the HeartMate-group due to infection. In the Jarvik 2000 patients, there was one driveline-infection (16%) after 270 days of support (0.08 device-related infections/100 patient-days), significantly less than in the HeartMate-group (P=0.044). Driveline infections resolved with antibiotics and local wound care in the Jarvik 2000 patient, but only in one of seven HeartMate-patients. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of the Jarvik 2000 is associated with less device-related infections than the HeartMate-LVAD. The power-supply of the permanent Jarvik 2000 is suitable for long-term mechanical support.     

Left ventricular function during support with an asynchronous pulsatile left ventricular assist device.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are frequently used to maintain patients with severe heart failure until heart transplantation becomes possible. Some patients may experience recovery of LV function during such support. Therefore, it is essential to be able to monitor changes in LV function in this setting. METHODS: We studied LV function in 10 patients (median age 34 years, 9 male) who had LVADs implanted because of severe heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy a median of 4 months previously. Median pre-implant ejection fraction was 27% and all patients had been on maximal medical therapy, including intravenous inotropic support, prior to insertion of the LVAD. RESULTS: During LVAD support there were cyclical variations in LV dimensions, fractional shortening (FS) and transmitral flow, related to changes in the phase relationship of the LV and the LVAD. The "best" FS occurred when LV systole coincided with device filling and the "worst" FS when LV systole coincided with device ejection. Median FS with the pump switched off was 18% (10% to 32%). Pump-off FS was significantly greater than the "worst" FS with the pump on (5%, p = 0.002), and similar to the "best" pump-on FS (19%, p = NS). CONCLUSIONS: LV function could be studied echocardiographically during LV support and brief periods of interruption in support. Function varied according to the phase relationship of the LV and LVAD. The "best" FS measured during LVAD support was more closely related to the FS with the device switched off than the "worst" pump on FS. The "best" pump-on LV function is therefore most representative of intrinsic LV performance and can be used as a guide to recovery and the potential need for pump-off studies.     

Gastrointestinal bleeding from arteriovenous malformations in patients supported by the Jarvik 2000 axial-flow left ventricular assist device.

The long-term effects of axial-flow mechanical circulatory support in humans are unclear. We report 3 cases of chronic gastrointestinal bleeding after implantation of a Jarvik 2000 axial-flow left ventricular assist device. The bleeding was refractory to aggressive management and in 2 cases resolved only after orthotopic cardiac transplantation.     

Comparison of functional capacity in patients with end-stage heart failure following implantation of a left ventricular assist device versus heart transplantation: results of the experience with left ventricular assist device with exercise trial.

BACKGROUND: Use of a permanent left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has been proposed as an alternate treatment of patients with end-stage heart failure. The purpose of this study was to compare the functional capacity of patients following implantation of a LVAD vs heart transplant (HTx). METHODS: Eighteen patients from 6 centers who received an intracorporeal LVAD as a bridge to HTx underwent treadmill testing 1 to 3 months post-LVAD and again post-HTx. Baseline and peak measurements, including oxygen consumption, blood pressures, and respiratory rate were made during each treadmill test. RESULTS: Peak oxygen consumption was 14.5+/-3.9 ml/kg/minute post-LVAD and 17.5+/-5.0 ml/kg/minute post-HTx (p < .005). The percentage of the predicted peak oxygen consumption based on gender, weight, and age was 39.5%+/-5.5% post-LVAD and 47.7%+/-10.9% post-HTx (p < .005). Exercise duration was lower post-LVAD than post-HTx (10.3+/-4.2 minute vs 12.5+/-5.4 minute, p < .05). After LVAD implantation, peak total oxygen consumption correlated with peak LVAD rate and output. Eight patients reached an LVAD rate of 120 beats per minute (bpm) before the conclusion of exercise, the maximum rate for the outpatient electric device. The peak respiratory exchange ratio post-LVAD was 1.15+/-0.22 and post-HTx was 1.15+/-0.18, consistent with a good effort in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients demonstrated a lower functional capacity post-LVAD than post-HTx. For some patients functional capacity post-LVAD may be improved by a higher maximum LVAD rate and output.     

TNFalpha in patients with end-stage heart failure on medical therapy or supported by a left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND: In the heart elevated levels of TNFalpha can cause lethal heart failure, like Dilated Cardiomyopathy (DCM). The level of TNFalpha production is in part determined by promoter gene polymorphisms. We investigated whether the TNFalpha promoter gene polymorphism is in this way involved in the outcome of end-stage heart failure and predicts whether patients require left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support or can be kept on medical therapy (MT)while awaiting heart transplantation (HTx). As most patients in this study received a heart transplant, the role of the TNFalpha polymorphisms in transplant rejection was studied as well. METHODS AND RESULTS: In twenty nine patients with DCM, 35 patients with Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD; both on MT), 26 patients on LVAD support and 61 cardiac transplant donors TNFalpha plasma level was detected by EASIA. In both patients groups high levels of TNFalpha plasma levels was observed however, in patients supported by LVAD this increase was much higher compared to patients on MT. Furthermore, this increase seems to be associated with the TNF 1 allele ('G' at position -308) instead of the TNF2 allele (A at position -308). The promoter polymorphisms at positions -238, -244 and -308 were observed by polymerase chain reaction and sequencing. Polymorphism at positions -238, -244 and -308 did not show any relevant differences between the groups. However, at position -308, a trend of a higher incidence of the TNF2 allele (an "A" at position -308) in DCM patients compared to donors was shown. The distribution of the TNF1 and TNF2 alleles was not different in patients on medical therapy compared to the patients supported by a LVAD. No association was found between patients' TNFalpha promoter gene polymorphism and rejection. However, patients that received a donor heart with the TNF2 allele developed more rejection episodes, compared to patients that received a donor heart with the TNF1 allele. CONCLUSION: TNFalpha levels are high in patients with end-stage heart failure on MT, but even higher in patients on LVAD support. These high TNFalpha plasma levels however, are not correlated with the TNF2 allele but seems to be associated with the TNF1 allele. Furthermore, in HTx the donor TNFalpha gene seem to play a more important role in severity of acute rejection than that of the patient.     

Implantation of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass

In this report, we describe successful implantation of a Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device (Jarvik Heart, Inc, New York, NY) without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass in a patient who was a member of the Jehovah's Witness faith. To accomplish this, we had to change our implantation technique. The modified technique, which minimizes the risk of bleeding and end-organ dysfunction, can also be used to decrease cardiopulmonary bypass time.     

Durable left ventricular assist device implantation in extremely obese heart failure patients

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have improved clinical outcomes and quality of life for those with end‐stage heart failure. However, the costs and risks associated with these devices necessitate appropriate patient selection. LVAD candidates are becoming increasingly more obese and there are conflicting reports regarding obesity’s effect on outcomes. Hence, we sought to evaluate the impact of extreme obesity on clinical outcomes after LVAD placement. Consecutive LVAD implantation patients at our center from June 2008 to May 2016 were studied retrospectively. We compared patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥40 kg/m² (extremely obese) to those with BMI < 40 kg/m² with respect to patient characteristics and surgical outcomes, including survival. 252 patients were included in this analysis, 30 (11.9%) of whom met the definition of extreme obesity. We found that patients with extreme obesity were significantly younger (47[33, 57] vs. 60[52, 67] years, P < 0.001) with fewer prior sternotomies (16.7% vs. 36.0%, P = 0.04). They had higher rates of pump thrombosis (30% vs. 9.0%, P = 0.003) and stage 2/3 acute kidney injury (46.7% vs. 27.0%, P = 0.003), but there were no differences in 30‐day or 1‐year survival, even after adjusting for age and clinical factors. Extreme obesity does not appear to place LVAD implantation patients at a higher risk for mortality compared to those who are not extremely obese; however, extreme obesity was associated with an increased risk of pump thrombosis, suggesting that these patients may require additional care to reduce the need for urgent device exchange.     

Use of the Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist system as a bridge to heart transplantation or as destination therapy for patients with chronic heart failure

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Jarvik 2000 axial flow left ventricular assist system (LVAS) as a bridge to transplant and as destination therapy. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The Jarvik 2000 LVAS was implanted in 22 patients (16 men, 6 women; mean age 53 years) as a bridge to transplant (in the United States) and in 4 patients (all men; mean age 62.8 years) as destination therapy (in the United Kingdom). All patients in both of these initial feasibility studies were in NYHA class 4. METHODS: The pump was implanted through a thoracotomy or median sternotomy incision with the aid of partial cardiopulmonary bypass in bridge-to-transplant patients. A skull-mounted percutaneous power delivery was used for the patients who received the pump as destination therapy. RESULTS: Of the 22 bridge-to-transplant patients, 13 underwent transplant; 7 died during support; and 2 studies are ongoing. The surviving patients have an average follow-up of 15 months; one died at 2.6 months after transplant, and the remaining patients are all in NYHA class 1. Support averaged 67.1 days. Deaths were due to acute myocardial infarction in two patients and multiorgan failure in five patients. Hemodynamic function improved with LVAS support. The average cardiac index increased 70.6% by 48 hours after implant, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure decreased 44%, systemic vascular resistance decreased significantly, and inotropic support became unnecessary. Similar results have been seen in the patients who received the device as destination therapy. In that series, one patient died of subdural hematoma 380 days after implant. The other two patients are in NYHA class 1, 642 and 889 days after implant. The average cardiac index increased 89.5%, and pulmonary capillary wedge decreased 52.2%. CONCLUSIONS: The Jarvik 2000 axial-flow LVAS can be used safely in selected patients to provide support until transplant or as destination therapy. In this series, the patients who most benefited from this device were those who required true left ventricular assistance rather than total capture of left ventricular output. Current experience indicates that continuous offloading of the ventricle is most effective when there is enough residual myocardial function to maintain pulsatility and aortic root ejection and to maintain, with nonpulsatile pump support, a normal cardiac index as well as reinstitution of the Frank-Starling response to the native ventricle.     

Cardiomyocyte death in patients with end-stage heart failure before and after support with a left ventricular assist device: low incidence of apoptosis despite ubiquitous mediators.

BACKGROUND: Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with end-stage heart failure results in impressive hemodynamic improvement. The effects on myocardial apoptosis and its mediators are unknown. METHODS: Myocardial biopsies from 17 patients at the time of LVAD implantation and after explantation, at the time of heart transplantation (HTx), were examined by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) reaction and with antibodies against Fas ligand (FasL), Fas, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha receptor 1 (TNF-R1), TNF-alpha receptor 2 (TNF-R2), TNF-alpha, TNF-alpha-converting enzyme (TACE), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), poly(ADP-ribose) (PAR), caspase-3 and FLICE inhibitory protein (FLIP). RESULTS: Apoptosis incidence was low: 0.8% (range 0% to 3%) positive cardiomyocytes nuclei before support, and 0.1% (range 0% to 0.6%) after support (p < 0.01). This was accompanied by low expression of caspase-3 and high expression of the DNA repair enzyme, PARP. Its product, PAR, increased after support. Mediators and receptors inducing apoptosis as well as FLIP were widely present before and after support. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the abundant presence of mediators and receptors inducing apoptosis, the incidence of apoptosis itself was low before and after mechanical support. The abundant expression of FLIP may suggest an important role for this protein in the inhibition of cardiomyocyte death.