The ipsilateral lamina–pedicle angle: can it be used to guide pedicle screw placement in the sub-axial cervical spine?

Pedicle screws in the sub-axial spine are infrequently used because of concerns over their safety and difficulty in placement, despite their superior pullout strength. In the sub-axial cervical vertebrae, we have observed that the lamina appears to project at right angles to the ipsilateral pedicle axis. The aim of this investigation was to confirm the lamina orientation as a reliable landmark for pedicle screw placement. 80 digital cervical spine CT were analysed. The angle formed by the ipsilateral outer lamina cortex to the pedicle axis was recorded. A total of 398 vertebrae were analysed from patients with a mean age of 39.5 years (range 18–78). Average axial lamina–pedicle angle ranged from 96.6° at C3 to 87.2° at C7 in males, and from 95.6° to 87.5° in females. The angle formed by the posterior cortex of the lamina and the ipsilateral pedicle shows a high level of consistency for sub-axial cervical vertebrae ranging from 96° at C3 to 87° at C7. Although the angle is not exactly 90° at all levels as hypothesised, the orientation of the lamina, nevertheless, forms a useful reference plane for insertion of pedicle screws in the sub-axial cervical spine.     

Freehand determination of the trajectory angle for cervical lateral mass screws: how accurate is it?

Different methods of lateral mass screw placement in the cervical spine have been described with separate trajectories for each technique in the sagittal and parasagittal planes. In the latter, plane 30° has been recommended in the modified Magerl’s technique as the optimum angle to avoid injury to the vertebral artery and nerve root. The estimation of this angle remains arbitrary and very much operator dependant. The aim of this study was to assess how accurately the lateral trajectory angle of 30° is achieved by visual estimation amongst experienced surgeons in a tertiary spinal unit and to determine the likelihood of neurovascular injury during the procedure. We chose an anatomical ‘sawbone’ model of the cervical spine with simulated lordosis. The senior author marked the entry points. Five spinal consultants and five senior spinal fellows were asked to insert 1.6-mm K wires into the lateral masses of C3 to C6 bilaterally at 30° to the midsagittal plane using the marked entry points. The lateral angulation in the transverse plane was measured using a custom protractor and documented for each surgeon at each level and side. The mean and standard deviation (SD) of the data were obtained to determine the inter observer variability. Utilising this data, measurements were then made on a normal axial computerised tomography (CT) scan of the cervical spine of an anonymous patient to determine if there would have been any neurovascular compromise. Among the 10 surgeons, a total of 80 insertion angles were measured from C3 to C6 on either side. The overall mean angle of insertion was 25.15 (range 20.4–34.8). The overall SD was 4.78. Amongst the 80 measurements between the ten surgeons, two episodes of theoretical vertebral artery violation were observed when the angles were simulated on the CT scan. A moderate but notable variability in trajectory placement exists between surgeons during insertion of cervical lateral mass screws. Freehand estimation of 30° is not consistently achieved between surgeons and levels. In patients with gross degenerative or deformed cervical spine anatomy, this may increase the risk of neurovascular injury. The use of the ipsilateral lamina as an anatomical reference plane is supported.     

Translaminar screws of the axis—an alternative technique for rigid screw fixation in upper cervical spine instability

C2 pedicle screws or transarticular atlantoaxial screws are technically demanding and carry an increased risk of vertebral artery injury. In up to 20% of cases, pedicle and transarticular screw placement is not possible due to a high-riding vertebral artery or very small C2 pedicles in addition to other anatomical variations. Translaminar screws have been reported to rigidly capture posterior elements of C2 and therefore appear to be a suitable alternative. We present our first experiences and clinical results with this new method in two neurosurgical spine centers. Twenty-seven adult patients were treated between 2007 and 2010 in two neurosurgical spine departments with C2 translaminar screw fixation for upper cervical spine instability of various origins (e.g., trauma, tumor, dens pseudarthrosis). Eight patients were men and 19 were women. Mean age was 68.9 years. In most cases, translaminar screws were used because of contraindications for pedicle or transarticular screws as a salvage technique. All patients were clinically assessed and had CT scans postoperatively to verify correct screw placement. Follow-up was performed with reexamination on an ambulatory basis. Mean follow-up was 7.6 months for all patients. In 27 patients, 52 translaminar screws were placed. There were no intraoperative complications. Postoperatively, we identified four screw malpositions using a new accuracy grading scale. One screw had to be revised because of violation of the spinal canal >4 mm. None of the patients had additional neurological deficits postoperatively, and all showed stable cervical conditions at follow-up. Two patients died due to causes not associated with the stabilization technique. The fusion rate for patients with C1/C2 fixation is 92.9%. Translaminar screws can be used at least as an additional technique for cases of upper cervical spine instability when pedicle screw placement is contraindicated or not possible. The current data suggest comparable biomechanical stability and fusion rates of translaminar screws to other well-known posterior fixation procedures. In addition, translaminar screw placement is technically less demanding and reduces the risk of vertebral artery injury.     

Laminar screw fixation in the subaxial cervical spine: A report on three cases

Although laminar screw fixation is often used at the C2 and C7 levels, only few previous case reports have presented the use of laminar screws at the C3-C6 levels. Here, we report a novel fixation method involving the use of practical laminar screws in the subaxial spine. We used laminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine in two cases to prevent vertebral artery injury and in one case to minimize exposure of the lamina. This laminar screw technique was successful in all three cases with adequate spinal rigidity, which was achieved without complications. The use of laminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine is a useful option for posterior fusion of the cervical spine.     

Virtual placement of posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw fixation

We wanted to evaluate how often safe and effective posterior C1-C2 transarticular screw placement is realizable when it is performed according to guidelines given in the literature. In 50 adult patients, computerized tomography scan data from C0 to C3 were transformed into a 3D spine model. Virtually, bilateral screws were placed from the medial third of the C2-C3 facet joint towards the rim of the C1 anterior arc parallel to midline. Three categories of virtual screw position were rated: optimal (virtual screw inside the C2 pars interarticularis, transversing the middle third of the atlantoaxial joint, and sparing the vertebral artery canal), suboptimal (virtual screw violating the C2 pars interarticularis, and/or transversing the lower or upper third of the C1-C2 joint, and sparing vertebral artery canal), and unacceptable (virtual screw breaching the vertebral artery canal). Optimal placement was seen in 74, suboptimal placement in 11, and unacceptable locations in 15 sites. We conclude that due to the variability of the anatomy of the upper cervical spine, optimal transarticular C1-C2 screw placement is not possible in up to 26%, and even hazardous in up to 15%. This paper was presented in part at the Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie, May 25–28, 2003, Saarbrücken, Germany     

Complications of transpedicular screw fixation in the cervical spine

Today, posterior stabilization of the cervical spine is most frequently performed by lateral mass screws or spinous process wiring. These techniques do not always provide sufficient stability, and anterior fusion procedures are added secondarily. Recently, transpedicular screw fixation of the cervical spine has been introduced to provide a one-stage stable posterior fixation. The aim of the present prospective study is to examine if cervical pedicle screw fixation can be done by low risk and to identify potential risk factors associated with this technique. All patients stabilized by cervical transpedicular screw fixation between 1999 and 2002 were included. Cervical disorders included multisegmental degenerative instability with cervical myelopathy in 16 patients, segmental instability caused by rheumatoid arthritis in three, trauma in five and instability caused by infection in two patients. In most cases additional decompression of the spinal cord and bone graft placement were performed. Pre-operative and post-operative CT-scans (2-mm cuts) and plain X-rays served to determine changes in alignment and the position of the screws. Clinical outcome was assessed in all cases. Ninety-four cervical pedicle screws were implanted in 26 patients, most frequently at the C3 (26 screws) and C4 levels (19 screws). Radiologically 66 screws (70%) were placed correctly (maximal breach 1 mm) whereas 20 screws (21%) were misplaced with reduction of mechanical strength, slight narrowing of the vertebral artery canal (<25%) or the lateral recess without compression of neural structures. However, these misplacements were asymptomatic in all cases. Another eight screws (9%) had a critical breach. Four of them showed a narrowing of the vertebral artery canal of more then 25%, in all cases without vascular problems. Three screws passed through the intervertebral foramen, causing temporary paresis in one case and a new sensory loss in another. In the latter patient revision surgery was performed. The screw was loosened and had to be corrected. The only statistically significant risk factor was the level of surgery: all critical breaches were seen from C3 to C5. Percutaneous application of the screws reduced the risk for misplacement, although this finding was not statistically significant. There was also a remarkable learning curve. Instrumentation with cervical transpedicular screws results in very stable fixation. However, with the use of new techniques like percutaneous screw application or computerized image guidance there remains a risk for damaging nerve roots or the vertebral artery. This technique should be reserved for highly selected patients with clear indications and to highly experienced spine surgeons.     

Placement of C2 laminar screws using three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based image guidance

The use of C2 laminar screws in posterior cervical fusion is a relatively new technique that provides rigid fixation of the axis with minimal risk to the vertebral artery. The techniques of C2 laminar screw placement described in the literature rely solely on anatomical landmarks to guide screw insertion. The authors report on their experience with placement of C2 laminar screws using three-dimensional (3D) fluoroscopy-based image-guidance in eight patients undergoing posterior cervical fusion. Overall, fifteen C2 laminar screws were placed. There were no complications in any of the patients. Average follow-up was 10 months (range 3–14 months). Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scanning was available for seven patients allowing evaluation of placement of thirteen C2 laminar screws, all of which were in good position with no spinal canal violation. The intraoperative planning function of the image-guided system allowed for 4-mm diameter screws to be placed in all cases. Using modified Odom’s criteria, excellent or good relief of preoperative symptoms was noted in all patients at final follow-up. Eric W. Nottmeier, MD is a paid consultant for BrainLAB.     

Pedicle screw fixation of the C7 vertebra using an anteroposterior fluoroscopic imaging technique

Cervical pedicle screws have been reported to be biomechanically superior to lateral mass screws. However, placement of these implants is a technical challenge. The purpose of this investigation was to use an anatomic and a clinical study to evaluate a technique for placement of the pedicle screws in the C7 vertebra using fluoroscopic imaging in only the anteroposterior (A/P) plane. Ten adult cadaver C7 vertebrae were used to record the pedicle width, inclination and a suitable entry point for placement of pedicle screws. A prospective study of 28 patients undergoing posterior instrumentation of the cervical spine with C7 pedicle screw placement was also performed. A total of 55 C7 pedicle screws were placed using imaging only in the A/P plane with screw trajectory values obtained by the anatomic study. Radiographs and CT scans were performed post-operatively. The average posterior pedicle diameter of C7 vertebra was 9.5 ± 1.2 mm in this study. The average middle pedicle diameter was 7.1 mm and the average anterior pedicle diameter was 9.2 mm. The average transverse pedicle angle was 26.8 on the right and 27.3 on the left. CT scans were obtained on 20 of 28 patients which showed two asymptomatic cortical wall perforations. One screw penetrated the lateral wall of the pedicle and another displayed an anterior vertebral penetration. There were no medial wall perforations. The preliminary results suggest that this technique is safe and suitable for pedicle screw placement in the C7 vertebra.     

Laminar screw fixation of the axis

OBJECT: Laminar fixation of the axis with crossing bilateral screws has been shown to provide rigid fixation with a theoretically decreased risk of vertebral artery damage compared with C1-2 transarticular screw fixation and C-2 pedicle screw fixation. Some studies, however, have shown restricted rigidity of such screws compared with C-2 pedicle screws, and others note that anatomical variability exists within the posterior elements of the axis that may have an impact on successful placement. To elucidate the clinical impact of such screws, the authors report their experience in placing C-2 laminar screws in adult patients over a 2-year period, with emphasis on clinical outcome and technical placement. METHODS: Sixteen adult patients with cervical instability underwent posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures at our institution with constructs involving C-2 laminar screws. Eleven patients were men and 5 were women, and they ranged in age from 28 to 84 years (mean 57 years). The reasons for fusion were degenerative disease (9 patients) and treatment of trauma (7 patients). In 14 patients (87.5%) standard translaminar screws were placed, and in 2 (12.5%) an ipsilateral trajectory was used. All patients underwent preoperative radiological evaluation of the cervical spine, including computed tomography scanning with multiplanar reconstruction to assess the posterior anatomy of C-2. Anatomical restrictions for placement of standard translaminar screws included a deeply furrowed spinous process and/or an underdeveloped midline posterior ring of the axis. In these cases, screws were placed into the corresponding lamina from the ipsilateral side, allowing bilateral screws to be oriented in a more parallel, as opposed to perpendicular, plane. All patients were followed for >2 years to record rates of fusion, instrumentation failure, and other complications. RESULTS: Thirty-two screws were placed without neurological or vascular complications. The mean follow-up duration was 27.3 months. Complications included 2 revisions, one for pseudarthrosis and the other for screw pullout, and 3 postoperative infections. CONCLUSIONS: Placement of laminar screws into the axis from the standard crossing approach or via an ipsilateral trajectory may allow a safe, effective, and durable means of including the axis in posterior cervical and cervicothoracic fusion procedures.     

枢椎后路棘突螺钉固定技术及其解剖学研究

目的 明确枢椎后路棘突螺钉固定的解剖学可行性和技术参数,为临床应用提供参考.方法 选取30具枢椎标本,仔细解剖以清楚地暴露椎板和棘突.测量枢椎棘突根部1/2的中点、中部和后部1/2的中点高度;棘突根部的头侧1/2的中点、中部和根部的尾侧1/2的中点厚度(精确到0.01 mm).选取20具枢椎标本,以棘突基底部为进钉点,双侧平行置入棘突螺钉,通过CT重建,测量棘突的宽度、螺钉进钉角度、钉道长度及钉尖与脊髓、椎动脉的距离.结果 枢椎棘突平均高度和厚度各自为(12.90±1.30)mm和(18.86±1.17)mm.所有棘突螺钉均成功置入枢椎棘突,未见螺钉侵犯椎管、横突孔和棘突劈裂.重建CT测量棘突中份基底部的平均宽度为(20.7±1. 3)mm;棘突螺钉在横断面的前倾角度为1.8°±1.0°,在横断面上和矢状面上几乎均是平行.螺钉钉道长度为(19.7±1. 1)mm,螺钉钉尖与椎动脉距离为(20.2±3.1)mm,螺钉钉尖与脊髓距离为(8.3±2.6)mm,上下位左右侧螺钉角度与椎动脉和脊髓的距离数据略有不同,但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05),但上位螺钉钉道长度(18.4±1.1)mm明显短于下位螺钉钉道长度(20.3±1.2)mm,差异有统计学意义(t=3.566,P＜0.01).结论 枢椎后路棘突螺钉具有一定的解剖学可行性,也许可以作为枢椎后路固定的一种补充内固定方法,但临床应用之前,尚需进一步的生物力学研究.     

枢椎棘突椎板螺钉固定技术及其解剖学研究

目的 明确枢椎后路棘突椎板螺钉固定的可行性和技术参数,为临床应用提供参考.方法 选取20具枢椎标本,仔细解剖以清楚地暴露椎板和棘突.以棘突基底部为进钉点,双侧平行置入棘突椎板螺钉,通过CT重建测量棘突的宽度、螺钉在横断面上的前倾角度、钉道长度及钉尖与脊髓、椎动脉距离.结果 所有螺钉均成功置入,未发现螺钉侵犯椎管、横突孔情况发生.重建CT测量发现棘突椎板螺钉在横断面的前倾角度为76.8°±10.6°;螺钉钉道平均长度为(23.1±3.2)mm,其中上位螺钉钉道长度[(22.9±3.3)mm]稍短于下位螺钉钉道长度[(23.3±3.1)mm],但差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05);螺钉钉尖与脊髓和椎动脉的距离分别为(5.3±1.6)mm和(17.4±3.7)mm.上下位螺钉前倾角度、与椎动脉和脊髓的距离数据略有不同,但差异均无统计学意义(P＞0.05).结论 枢椎棘突椎板螺钉固定具有解剖学可行性,也许可以作为枢椎后路固定的一种补充内固定方法.

Abstract：

Objectives To explore the feasibility and the technical parameters in posterior C2 spinous process laminar screw fixation, and discuss the clinic significance of C2 spinous process laminar screws. Methods Twenty cervical cadaveric spines of C2 were dissected, with care taken to expose the lamina and spinous process. After the entrance point of spinous process screw were determined, posterior C2 spinous process laminar screw implantation was performed under visual control. On the morphologic CT scan,the angle and length of the spinous process laminar screw trajectory and the distance between the tip of the screw and the spinal cord and the vertebral artery were measured. Results The C2 spinous process laminar screws were successfully placed, without impingement of the spinal cord and the vertebral artery. There were little differences between superior and inferior screws in the angle, trajectory length and the distance between the tip of the screw and the spinal cord and the vertebral artery, but without significance (P＞0.05). The placed angles of the screws were 76. 8°± 10. 6° in the axial plane. The distance between the tip of the screw and the spinal cord and the vertebral artery was (5.3+1.6) mm and (17.4 ± 3.7) mm respectively. The trajectory length was (23.1±3.2) mm. Conclusions Posterior C2 spinous process laminar screw fixation is feasible. C2 spinous process laminar screw fixation affords an alternative to standard screw placement for plate fixation and cervical stabilization.     

The Feasibility of Translaminar Screws in the Subaxial Cervical Spine: Computed Tomography and Cadaveric Validation

BackgroundThe use of translaminar screws may serve as a viable salvage method for complicated cases. To our understanding, the study of the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the actual entire subaxial cervical spine has not been carried out yet. The purpose of this study was to report the feasibility of translaminar screw insertion in the entire subaxial cervical spine.MethodsEighteen cadaveric spines were harvested from C3 to C7 and 1-mm computed tomography (CT) scans and three-dimensional reconstructions were created to exclude any bony anomaly. Thirty anatomically intact segments were collected (C3, 2; C4, 3; C5, 3; C6, 8; and C7, 14), and randomly arranged. Twenty-one segments were physically separated at each vertebral level (group S), while 9 segments were not separated from the vertebral column and left in situ (group N–S). CT measurement of lamina thickness was done for both group S and group N–S, and manual measurement of various length and angle was done for group S only. Using the trajectory proposed by the previous studies, translaminar screws were placed at each level. Screw diameter was the same or 0.5 mm larger than the proposed diameter based on CT measurement. Post-insertion CT was performed. Cortical breakage was checked either visually or by CT.ResultsWhen 1° and 2° screws of the same size were used, medial cortex breakage was found 13% and 33% of the time, respectively. C7 was relatively safer than the other levels. With larger-sized screws, medial cortex breakage was found in 47% and 46% of 1° and 2° screws, respectively. There were no facet injuries due to the screws in group N–S.ConclusionsTranslaminar screw insertion in the subaxial cervical spine is feasible only when the lamina is thick enough to avoid any breakage that could lead to further complications. The authors do not recommend inserting translaminar screws in the subaxial cervical spine except in some salvage cases in the presence of a thick lamina.     

Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1–C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws

Background contextTo our knowledge, no large series comparing the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1–C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw have been published. In addition, no comparative studies have been performed on those with a high-riding vertebral artery and/or a narrow pedicle who are thought to be at higher risk than those with normal anatomy.PurposeTo compare the risk of vertebral artery injury by C1–C2 transarticular screw versus C2 pedicle screw in an overall patient population and subsets of patients with a high-riding vertebral artery and a narrow pedicle using computed tomography (CT) scan images and three-dimensional (3D) screw trajectory software.Study designRadiographic analysis using CT scans.Patient sampleComputed tomography scans of 269 consecutive patients, for a total of 538 potential screw insertion sites for each type of screw.Outcome measuresCortical perforation into the vertebral artery groove of C2 by a screw.MethodsWe simulated the placement of 4.0 mm transarticular and pedicle screws using 1-mm-sliced CT scans and 3D screw trajectory software. We then compared the frequency of C2 vertebral artery groove violation by the two different fixation methods. This was done in the overall patient population, in the subset of those with a high-riding vertebral artery (defined as an isthmus height ≤5 mm or internal height ≤2 mm on sagittal images) and with a narrow pedicle (defined as a pedicle width ≤4 mm on axial images).ResultsThere were 78 high-riding vertebral arteries (14.5%) and 51 narrow pedicles (9.5%). Most (82%) of the narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery, whereas only 54% of the high-riding vertebral arteries had a concurrent narrow pedicle. Overall, 9.5% of transarticular and 8.0% of pedicle screws violated the C2 vertebral artery groove without a significant difference between the two types of screws (p=.17). Among those with a high-riding vertebral artery, vertebral artery groove violation was significantly lower (p=.02) with pedicle (49%) than with transarticular (63%) screws. Among those with a narrow pedicle, vertebral artery groove violation was high in both groups (71% with transarticular and 76% with pedicle screws) but without a significant difference between the two groups (p=.55).ConclusionsOverall, neither technique has more inherent anatomic risk of vertebral artery injury. However, in the presence of a high-riding vertebral artery, placement of a pedicle screw is significantly safer than the placement of a transarticular screw. Narrow pedicles, which might be anticipated to lead to higher risk for a pedicle screw than a transarticular screw, did not result in a significant difference because most patients (82%) with narrow pedicles had a concurrent high-riding vertebral artery that also increased the risk with a transarticular screw. Except in case of a high-riding vertebral artery, our results suggest that the surgeon can opt for either technique and expect similar anatomic risks of vertebral artery injury.     

Posterior stabilization of the lower cervical spine with lateral mass plates and screws

Posterior cervical fixation using lateral mass plates and screws is becoming increasingly used and accepted.Advantages include increased rigidity, ability to be used in cases where the lamina or spinous processes are deficient or missing, use across the occipito-cervical or cervico-thoracic junction, and need for less postoperative bracing. Safe placement of lateral mass screws requires complete exposure and identification of the boundaries of the lateral masses. The starting point for screw placement is 1 to 2 mm medial to the center of lateral mass. The screws are angulated outward 10 to 20 degrees and cranially 20 to 30 degrees to be parallel to the facet joints. An adjustable drill guide facilitates safe drilling and tapping techniques. All 102 patients with unstable cervical spines treated with AO reconstruction plates and autogenous bone graft had healed fusions based on flexion-extension radiographs. The reductions achieved postoperatively were maintained at follow-up. Two patients had transient radiculopathies secondary to screw placement. The indications for lateral mass fixation include cases where the lamina or spinal processes are deficient or missing, multilevel or rotational instabilities, when extension to the thoracic spine or occiput is required or when decreased bracing is beneficial.     

Multiplanar reconstructions of helical computed tomography in planning of atlanto-axial transarticular fixation

The objective of this study was to determine atlanto-axial bone morphometric measurements related to screw transarticular fixation technique. One hundred helical computerized tomography (helical CT) scans with volumetric acquisition, including the first and the second cervical vertebrae, were studied. The screw insertion axis according to the Magerl technique for C1–C2 transarticular fixation was the referential to select the correct oblique axial and oblique parasagittal planes obtained with multiplanar reconstruction (MPR) on helical CT. The selected measured parameters on each side of the vertebrae were C2 interarticular isthmus height and width, optimal screw length, optimal screw trajectory sagittal and axial angles, and the distance between the ideal screw trajectory and the vertebral artery groove. C2 interarticular isthmus height measured 7.75±1.27 mm, C2 interarticular isthmus width 7.94±1.72 mm, optimal screw length 39.03±2.81 mm, optimal screw trajectory sagittal angle 57.54±5.28°, optimal screw trajectory medial angle 7.90±4.05°. Isthmus narrowing under 5 mm (height and/or width) was seen in 5% of cases. In 30% of cases reconstructed parasagittal images showed the vertebral artery groove. In those cases, the distance between the vertebral artery groove and the ideal screw path was measured. This distance measured under 2.5 mm in 7% of C2 articular masses. A classification of C2 articular mass morfology was proposed. The C2 articular masses without anatomic variations predisposing to vertebral artery injury were considered type I. The C2 articular masses potentially associated with vascular injury (12%) were classified as type II. Potential risk was identified at the C2 isthmus only (3%), at the anterior portion of C2 articular mass only (7%) or at both regions (2%). According to selected criteria 18% of patients would have at least one side C2 articular mass with potential risk for the vertebral artery. In 6% of patients the potential risk was identified bilaterally. There is a great variation in the maximum and minimum values of the anatomic measurements. Therefore preoperative CT scans are very important to identify type II cases, such that the surgeon may preoperatively define the bony anatomy trough which the screws will pass.     

Rapid prototype patient-specific drill template for cervical pedicle screw placement.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and accuracy of a drill template for the placement of a cervical pedicle screw in a single vertebral level. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A volumetric CT scan was performed on a cadaver cervical spine. Using computer software, a drill template with a predefined trajectory was constructed that was designed to match the posterior surface of the right side of the fifth cervical vertebra. A physical template was created from the computer model using a rapid prototyping machine. The drill template was used to guide drilling of a pilot hole, and a CT scan was performed to assess the accuracy of this hole. A 3.5-mm diameter pedicle screw was placed in the pilot hole. The spine was then dissected to separate the vertebrae and the trajectory of the screw was visually inspected. RESULTS: The feasibility of this patient-specific rapid prototyping technique was demonstrated. Imaging and visual inspection confirmed accurate placement of the pilot hole and cervical pedicle screw without cortical violation. CONCLUSIONS: The potential use of drill templates to place cervical pedicle screws is promising. Our initial methodology appears to provide an accurate technique and trajectory for pedicle screw placement in the cervical spine.     

导向器结合钉道内壁探查法在下颈椎椎弓根螺钉置入中应用研究

目的:探讨导向器结合钉道内壁探查法置入下颈椎弓根螺钉的技巧并评价其准确性及安全性。方法:2014年1月至2016年10月采用自行设计带角度仪导向器结合钉道内壁探查法对11例患者置入下颈椎椎弓根螺钉,其中男7例,女4例;年龄32~63岁,平均48.1岁;脊髓型颈椎病4例,颈椎骨折脱位4例,无骨折脱位颈脊髓损伤1例,寰枢椎骨折脱位2例。术前CT测量出目标椎弓根直径、理想进钉点及矢状面夹角和横断面内倾角。术中使用自行设计带角度仪导向器严格控制进钉角度,结合探查钉道内壁作为安全置钉标志。术后观察患者有无脊髓及椎动脉损伤表现,复查CT评价椎弓根螺钉位置,并将螺钉准确性进行分级,计算螺钉优良率。结果:11例患者共置入71枚下颈椎弓根螺钉,均未出现手术所导致的脊髓及神经根损伤症状,亦无椎动脉损伤症状。术后CT评估螺钉位置并进行分级:0级52枚,1级13枚,2级4枚,3级2枚。螺钉位置良好率91%。6枚误置螺钉,内壁穿破4枚,2枚穿破外壁。结论:钉道内壁探查法置入下颈椎弓根螺钉安全可靠,但有一定的学习曲线。术中探查出钉道内壁及使用角度仪导向器控制进钉角度是置钉关键。     

A novel computer-assisted drill guide template for placement of C2 laminar screws

The present method of C2 laminar screw placement relies on anatomical landmarks for screw placement. Placement of C2 laminar screws using drill template has not been described in the literature. The authors reported on their experience with placement of C2 laminar screws using a novel computer-assisted drill guide template in nine patients undergoing posterior occipito-cervical fusion. CT scan of C2 vertebrae was performed. 3D model of C2 vertebrae was reconstructed by software MIMICS 10.01. The 3D vertebral model was then exported in STL format, and opened in a workstation running software UG imageware12.0 for determining the optimal laminar screw size and orientation. A virtual navigational template was established according to the laminar anatomic trait. The physical vertebrae and navigational template were manufactured using rapid prototyping. The navigational template was sterilized and used intraoperative to assist the placement of laminar screw. Overall, 19 C2 laminar screws were placed and the accuracy of screw placement was confirmed with postoperative X-ray and CT scanning. There were not complications of related screws insertion. Average follow-up was 9 months (range 4–13 months), 77.8% of the patients exhibited improvement in their myelopathic symptoms; in 22.2% the symptoms were unchanged. Postoperative computed tomographic (CT) scanning was available for allowing the evaluation of placement of thirteen C2 laminar screws, all of which were in good position with no spinal canal violation. This study shows a patient-specific template technique that is easy to use, can simplify the surgical act and generates highly accurate C2 laminar screw placement. Advantages of this technology over traditional techniques include planning of the screw trajectory is done completely in the presurgical period as well as the ability to size the screw to the patient’s anatomy.     

Subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion with newly defined entry point and trajectory: accuracy evaluation in cadavers

Successful placement of cervical pedicle screws requires accurate identification of both entry point and trajectory. However, literature has not provided consistent recommendations regarding the direction of pedicle screw insertion and entry point location. The objective of this study was to define a guideline regarding the optimal entry point and trajectory in placing subaxial cervical pedicle screws and to evaluate the screw accuracy in cadaver cervical spines. The guideline for entry point and trajectory for each vertebra was established based on the recently published morphometric data. Six fresh frozen cervical spines (C3–C7) were used. There were two men and four women. After posterior exposure, the entry point was determined and the cortical bone of the entry point was removed using a 2-mm burr. Pilot holes were created with a cervical probe based on the guideline using fluoroscopy. After tapping, 3.5-mm screws with appropriate length were inserted. After screw insertion, every vertebra was dissected and inspected for pedicle breach. The pedicle width, height, pedicle transverse angulation and actual screw insertion angle were measured. A total of 60 pedicle screws were inserted. No statistical difference in pedicle width and height was found between the left and right sides for each level. The overall accuracy of pedicle screws was 83.3%. The remaining 13.3% screws had noncritical breach, and 3.3% had critical breach. The critical breach was not caused by the guideline. There was no statistical difference between the pedicle transverse angulation and the actual screw trajectory created using the guideline. There was statistical difference in pedicle width between the breach and non-breach screws. In conclusion, high success rate of subaxial cervical pedicle screw placement can be achieved using the recently proposed operative guideline and oblique views of fluoroscopy. However, careful preoperative planning and good surgical skills are still required to ensure screw placement accuracy and to reduce the risk of neural and vascular injury.     

Evaluation of thoracic pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Pedicle screw fixation is a challenging procedure in thoracic spine, as inadvertently misplaced screws have high risk of complications. The accuracy of pedicle screws is typically defined as the screws axis being fully contained within the cortices of the pedicle. One hundred and eighty-five thoracic pedicle screws in 19 patients that were drawn from a total of 1.797 screws in 148 scoliosis patients being suspicious of medial and lateral malpositioning were investigated, retrospectively. Screw containment and the rate of misplacement were determined by postoperative axial CT sections. Medial screw malposition was measured between medial pedicle wall and medial margin of the pedicle screw. The distance between lateral margin of the pedicle screw and lateral vertebral corpus was measured in lateral malpositions. A screw that violated medially greater than 2 mm, while lateral violation greater than 6 mm was rated as an “unacceptable screw”. The malpositions were medial in 20 (10.8%) and lateral in 34 (18.3%) screws. Medially, nine screws were rated as acceptable. Of the 29 acceptable lateral misplacement, 13 showed significant risk; five to aorta, six to pleura, one to azygos vein and one to trachea. The acceptability of medial pedicle breach may change in each level with different canal width and a different amount of cord shift. In lateral acceptable malpositions, the aorta is always at a risk by concave-sided screws. This CT-based study demonstrated that T4–T9 concave segments have a smaller safe zone with respect to both cord-aorta injury in medial and lateral malpositions. In these segments, screws should be accurate and screw malposition is to be unacceptable.