(+/-) Ketamine-induced prepulse inhibition deficits of an acoustic startle response in rats are not reversed by antipsychotics

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) is the reduction in the startle response caused by a low intensity non-startling stimulus (the prepulse) which is presented shortly before the startle stimulus and is an operational measure of sensorimotor gating. PPI is impaired in psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia. Ketamine, a non-competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist has been shown to induce schizophrenia-like behavioural changes in humans and PPI deficits in rats, which can be reversed by antipsychotics. Thus, ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats may provide a translational model of schizophrenia. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of antipsychotic drugs and drugs known to alter the glutamate system upon ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats. Rats were habituated to the PPI procedure [randomized trials of either pulse alone (110 dB/50 ms) or prepulse + pulse (80 dB/10 ms)]. Animals were assigned to pre-treatments based on the level of PPI on the last habituation test and balanced across startle chambers. Ketamine (1-10 mg/kg s.c; 15 min ptt) increased startle amplitude and induced PPI deficits at 6 and 10 mg/kg. PPI deficits induced by ketamine at 6 mg/kg were not attenuated by clozapine (2.5-10 mg/kg s.c.; 60 min ptt), risperidone (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.; 60 min ptt), haloperidol (0.1-1 mg/kg i.p.; 60 min ptt), lamotrigine (3-30 mg/kg p.o.; 60 min ptt), or SB-271046-A (5-20 mg/kg p.o.; 2 hour ptt) nor potentiated by 2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)-pyridine (3-10 mg/kg i.p.; 30 min ptt). These results suggest that under these test conditions ketamine-induced PPI deficits in rats is relatively insensitive and does not represent a translational model for drug discovery in schizophrenia.     

Discriminative-stimulus effects of clozapine in squirrel monkeys: comparison with conventional and novel antipsychotic drugs

 The effects of conventional and novel atypical antipsychotic drugs were compared to clozapine in squirrel monkeys that discriminated IM injections of clozapine (1.0 mg/kg) from saline in a two-lever drug discrimination procedure. Clozapine (0.03–3.0 mg/kg) produced dose-related increases in responding on the clozapine-associated lever with full substitution at the training dose in all monkeys. Dose-related increases in responding on the clozapine-associated lever and full substitution also were observed with structural analogues of clozapine including perlapine and fluperlapine (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), seroquel (0.1–5.6 mg/kg), and JL 5, JL 8 and JL 18 (0.1–3.0 mg/kg). Other clozapine analogues, including olanzapine, amoxapine, loxapine and clothiapine, and conventional antipsychotic drugs, including phenothiazines such as chlorpromazine and thioridazine, produced some clozapine-associated responding up to the highest doses that could be studied, but did not substitute for clozapine. Olanzapine did produce full clozapine-lever responding following pretreatment with the dopamine D₂-receptor agonist (+)-PHNO (0.003–0.01 mg/kg). Putatively atypical antipsychotics that are structurally unrelated to clozapine including risperidone (0.003–0.1 mg/kg), sertindole (0.03–1.0 mg/kg) and remoxipride (0.1–5.6 mg/kg) similarly failed to substitute for clozapine up to the highest doses. The present results indicate that some, but not all, structural analogs of clozapine have clozapine-like discriminative-stimulus effects and that novel antipsychotic drugs which purportedly have clozapine-like clinical efficacy may not produce its interoceptive stimulus effects. Received: 2 November 1996 / Final version: 13 January 1997     

Generalization testing with atypical and typical antipsychotic drugs in rats trained to discriminate 5.0 mg/kg clozapine from vehicle in a two‐choice drug discrimination task

Clozapine (CLZ) drug discrimination is used as a preclinical model to evaluate compounds for putative atypical antipsychotic properties. In rats, a 1.25 mg/kg CLZ training dose appears to have greater pharmacological specificity for atypical antipsychotic drugs than the traditional 5.0 mg/kg CLZ training dose; however, methodological differences among studies have precluded a direct comparison between these training doses. In the present study, rats were trained to discriminate a 5.0 mg/kg CLZ dose from vehicle in a two‐choice drug discrimination task using methods similar to those in a previous study from our laboratory that used a 1.25 mg/kg CLZ training dose. Clozapine produced full substitution (≥80% CLZ‐lever responding) for itself at the training dose (5.0 mg/kg). The atypical antipsychotics olanzapine, quetiapine, and ziprasidone also produced full substitution for 5.0 mg/kg CLZ, whereas the atypical antipsychotics risperidone and sertindole produced partial substitution (≥60% CLZ‐lever responding). The typical antipsychotic, thioridazine, produced full substitution for the 5.0 mg/kg CLZ training dose, but the typical antipsychotics chlorpromazine, fluphenazine, and haloperidol failed to substitute for clozapine. In a subgroup of 1.25 mg/kg CLZ‐trained rats, ziprasidone produced strong partial substitution (73.0 % CLZ‐lever responding) for the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ training dose. Based on these findings, some atypical antipsychotic drugs (i.e., quetiapine and ziprasidone) produce full substitution only for the 5.0 mg/kg CLZ training dose, whereas other atypical antipsychotic drugs (i.e., sertindole and risperidone) produce full substitution only for the 1.25 mg/kg CLZ training dose. Thus, both of these training doses are important for the screening of putative atypical antipsychotic drugs with the clozapine drug discrimination assay. Drug Dev. Res. 64:55–65, 2005. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Different behavioral effects of haloperidol,clozapine and thioridazine in a concurrent lever pressing and feeding procedure

Rats were tested using a lever pressing/feeding procedure in which a preferred food (Bioserve pellets) was available by pressing a lever on a fixed ratio 5 schedule, but a less preferred food (lab chow) was also available concurrently in the operant chamber. The effects of repeated (14 day) injections of haloperidol, clozapine and thioridazine were compared. Haloperidol (0.05–0.15 mg/kg) significantly reduced lever pressing and increased chow intake throughout the drug treatment period. Injections of clozapine (2.0–6.0 mg/kg) suppressed lever pressing but failed to produce substantial increases in chow intake. In the haloperidol experiment there was a significant inverse correlation between lever pressing and chow intake, but in the clozapine experiment there was not. Regression analysis indicated that rats treated with the high dose of clozapine showed some tolerance to the suppression of lever pressing. Tests of sedation also were conducted before and after the instrumental behavior sessions. Haloperidol produced little or no sedative effect in the dose range tested. Clozapine produced substantial sedation during the first 10 days of administration, but this effect, like the suppression of lever pressing, showed signs of tolerance. Thioridazine (3.0–9.0 mg/kg) produced some effects that resembled haloperidol, and other effects, including sedation, that resembled clozapine. These studies indicate that haloperidol suppresses lever pressing for food at low doses that do not produce severe motivational or sedative effects that disrupt food intake. In contrast, it appears as though the suppression of lever pressing produced by clozapine stems from a sedative effect that also serves to set limits on chow intake. These results indicate that haloperidol and clozapine suppress lever pressing through different mechanisms.     

Effects of amisulpride and aripiprazole on progressive-ratio schedule performance: comparison with clozapine and haloperidol

Clozapine and some other atypical antipsychotics (e.g. quetiapine, olanzapine) have been found to exert a characteristic profile of action on operant behaviour maintained by progressive-ratio schedules, as revealed by Killeen's Mathematical Principles of Reinforcement model of schedule-controlled behaviour. These drugs increase the value of a parameter that expresses the 'incentive value' of the reinforcer (a) and a parameter that is inversely related to the organism's 'motor capacity' (δ). This experiment examined the effects of two further atypical antipsychotics, aripiprazole and amisulpride, on progressive-ratio schedule performance in rats; the effects of clozapine and a conventional antipsychotic, haloperidol, were also examined. In agreement with previous findings, clozapine (4, 8?mg kg(-1)) increased a and δ, whereas haloperidol (0.05, 0.1?mg kg(-1)) reduced a and increased δ. Aripiprazole (3,30?mg kg(-1)) increased δ but did not affect a. Amisulpride (5, 50?mg kg(-1)) had a delayed and protracted effect: δ was increased 3-6 hours after treatment; a was increased 1.5 hours, and reduced 12-24 hours after treatment. Interpretation based on Killeen's model suggests that aripiprazole does not share clozapine's ability to enhance reinforcer value. Amisulpride produced a short-lived enhancement, followed by a long-lasting reduction, of reinforcer value. Both drugs impaired motor performance.     

Haloperidol both prevents and reverses quinpirole-induced nonregulatory water intake, a putative animal model of psychogenic polydipsia

RATIONALE: Polydipsia is a severe complication of long-term schizophrenia and, despite its unknown pathogenesis, is empirically treated with typical or atypical antipsychotics. In the rat, nonregulatory water intake is induced by repeated administration of amphetamine-like compounds or by the D2/3 agonist, quinpirole. OBJECTIVE: This study is aimed at determining the potential activity of antipsychotic compounds with different affinities for D2 receptors in preventing and/or reversing quinpirole-induced polydipsia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats were treated with five injections of quinpirole (0.5 mg/kg i.p.) to induce polydipsia. The oral effects of haloperidol, olanzapine, clozapine, and ST2472 on QNP-induced polydipsia were analyzed in the following two schedules. In the preventive schedule, haloperidol (0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5, 3, and 6 mg/kg), ST2472 (1 and 2 mg/kg), and clomipramine (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) were given in combination with quinpirole from day 1 to day 5. In the reversal schedule, rats showing quinpirole-induced polydipsia on the third day received haloperidol (0.4 mg/kg), olanzapine (1.5 and 3 mg/kg), clozapine (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg), ST2472 (1, 2, 5, and 10 mg/kg), and clomipramine (5, 10, and 20 mg/kg) before quinpirole on days 4 and 5. RESULTS: Haloperidol both prevented and reversed quinpirole-induced polydipsia, whereas olanzapine and ST2472 only reversed it. Clomipramine prevented but did not reverse quinpirole-induced polydipsia, and clozapine did not reverse it either. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that, once developed, polydipsia is governed by dopaminergic D2 mechanisms. In contrast, either an increase in the serotoninergic tone or an inhibition of D2 receptors can modulate the development of quinpirole-induced excessive drinking.     

Effects of clozapine,olanzapine and haloperidol on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in the rat

Rationale. Antipsychotic drugs, particularly the newer atypical compounds, have been associated with rapid weight gain in a clinical setting. However, there are few reported animal models producing reliable hyperphagia correlating with the human weight gain liability of these drugs. Objective. To compare the effects of the classic neuroleptic haloperidol with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine on the microstructure of ingestive behaviour in rats. Methods. Male hooded Lister rats drank a palatable high-calorie fat emulsion (10% Intralipid) during 30-min test sessions and microstructural analyses were made following administration of each drug over a range of doses. Results. Clozapine (0.3 mg/kg) and olanzapine (0.1, 0.3, 1 mg/kg) significantly increased intake, whilst haloperidol (0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) significantly decreased drinking. No significant changes in the latency to the first lick were observed following any of the drugs tested. Median interlick intervals showed small, dose-related increases after clozapine (3.0 mg/kg), olanzapine (0.3, 1.0 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.1, 0.2 mg/kg). Olanzapine (1.0 mg/kg) significantly elevated the number of clusters of licking (bouts of licking separated by pauses greater than 500 ms), whilst clozapine and haloperidol did not. Mean cluster size (licks per cluster) was not affected by clozapine or olanzapine, but haloperidol (0.025, 0.05, 0.1, 0.2 mg/kg) produced marked, significant decreases in cluster size. Conclusions. Clozapine and olanzapine increased fat intake whereas haloperidol did not, and this resembles the greater weight gain liability of atypical antipsychotics in humans. A delay or reduction of the post-ingestive satiety signal combined with preserved palatability appears to be the mechanism responsible for fat hyperphagia in rats treated with clozapine and olanzapine. Conversely, haloperidol leaves satiety unaffected but reduces the palatability of the fat emulsion resulting in reduced intake. Electronic Publication     

The effect of zotepine, risperidone, clozapine and olanzapine on MK-801-disrupted sensorimotor gating

Dizocilpine (MK-801; 0.3 mg/kg i.p.)-induced disruption in prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle response (PPI) can be preferentially restored by “atypical” antipsychotics. In contrast, some findings indicate that not all of the “atypical” antipsychotics, such as clozapine and risperidone, are effective in restoring the NMDA antagonist-induced deficits in PPI.

In our study, we evaluated the effect of four different “atypical” antipsychotic drugs on deficits in PPI induced by MK-801. Zotepine and risperidone have high affinities to D2-like and 5-HT_2A receptors, while clozapine and olanzapine have multipharmacological profiles with the highest affinities to serotonin 5-HT_1A,2A/2C receptors and muscarinic receptors.

Results have shown that MK-801 disrupted PPI and increased the ASR in rats. Our results showed no effect of zotepine (1 and 2 mg/kg) and risperidone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg) on disrupted PPI by MK-801. Administration of clozapine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) restored the deficits in PPI induced by MK-801. Additionally, we found a decrease of approximately 46% in PPI after administration of clozapine (5 mg/kg) and olanzapine (2.5 and 5 mg/kg) without MK-801 treatment.

In summary, the four “atypical” antipsychotics had different efficacies to restore the disrupted PPI by MK-801. Only clozapine and olanzapin restored the MK-801-induced deficits in PPI.     

Cannabidiol inhibits the hyperlocomotion induced by psychotomimetic drugs in mice

Cannabidiol is a non-psychotomimetic compound from Cannabis sativa. It is proposed as a possible antipsychotic drug, since it can prevent some psychotomimetic-like effects of Delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol or apomorphine. Therefore, the aim of this work was to test the hypothesis that cannabidiol would inhibit the hyperlocomotion induced by two psychotomimetic drugs, D-amphetamine or ketamine. Male Swiss mice received i.p. injections of haloperidol (0.15-0.6 mg/kg), clozapine (1.25-5 mg/kg) or cannabidiol (15-60 mg/kg) followed by D-amphetamine (5 mg/kg) or ketamine (60 mg/kg). Thirty minutes after the first injection, the distance moved in circular arena was measured during 10 min. In another group of experiments, catalepsy was measured 30 min after haloperidol, clozapine or cannabidiol injections. Cannabidiol, like clozapine but unlike haloperidol, inhibited hyperlocomotion without inducing catalepsy. Moreover, cannabidiol itself, unlike haloperidol and clozapine, did not decrease locomotion. In conclusion, cannabidiol exhibits an antipsychotic-like profile without inducing extrapyramidal-like effects.     

Differential effects of two cannabinoid receptor agonists on progressive ratio responding for food and free-feeding in rats

The cannabinoid receptor agonists delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta9-THC) and HU-210 were compared in terms of their effects on: (1) progressive ratio (PR) responding for food, and (2) free food intake. In the first experiment, food-deprived Wistar rats were trained on a time-constrained (60 min) PR-5 schedule for food reinforcement, in which the response requirement incremented by five lever presses for each successive reinforcer. One group of rats received vehicle, 0.5, 1 or 3 mg/kg delta9-THC (i.p.), and three other groups received HU-210 (i.p.) at three different dose ranges, spanning 0.001-0.1 mg/kg. In the second experiment, the effects of the two drugs on free food intake were tested in a separate group of non-deprived rats. For PR responding, delta9-THC significantly increased the break point (final ratio completed) and the total number of lever presses emitted. The same drug also significantly increased free food intake. However, the effects of HU-210 were quite different: it did not alter PR responding at any dose; instead, its only significant effect was to reduce free food intake at 0.06 mg/kg. These data suggest that increased motivation to obtain food might underlie the hyperphagic effects of delta9-THC. However, the synthetic agonist HU-210 has different effects: it only acts to reduce feeding behaviour, an outcome that probably reflects non-specific behavioural disruption. These findings suggest important differences between the two CB1 receptor agonists in terms of their pharmacological effects.     

Effect of SB 200646A,a 5-HT2C/5-HT2B receptor antagonist,in two conflict models of anxiety

SB 200646A is the first selective 5-HT_2C/5-HT_2B receptor antagonist and has previously been observed to have anxiolytic-like properties in the rat social interaction test. In the present study the effects of the compound in two conflict models of anxiety, the rat Geller-Seifter and marmoset conflict test, were examined. In the rat Geller-Seifter test, suppressed responding was increased by all doses of SB 200646A between 5 and 40 mg/kg PO when given 1 h pretest. Unsuppressed responding was slightly increased only at 10 mg/kg PO. Suppressed responding was also increased by the benzodiazepine anxiolytic, chlordiazepoxide, at 1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg PO 1 h pretest. Unsuppressed responding was modestly increased by chlordiazepoxide only at 5 mg/kg PO. In the marmoset conflict test marmosets were trained to lever press for a palatable food reward. Lever pressing was subsequently suppressed by air puffs. In this procedure suppressed responding was increased by both the benzodiazepine anxiolytic diazepam at 2 and 5 mg/kg PO and SB 200646A after 10 and 20 mg/kg PO. Both treatments caused small increases in unsuppressed responding at 2 and 20 mg/kg PO respectively. Taken together with the previous effects of SB 200646A in the rat social interaction test, this is compelling evidence that 5-HT_2C/2B receptor antagonists may possess anxiolytic properties.     

Clozapine, but not haloperidol, increases brain concentrations of neuroactive steroids in the rat.

The extrapyramidal side effects of typical antipsychotics, which are induced to a markedly reduced extent by clozapine, have been linked to a dysfunction of central gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-mediated neurotransmission. The effects of clozapine on the brain concentrations of 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (allopregnanolone, AP) and 3alpha,21-dihydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (allotetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone, THDOC), two potent and endogenous positive allosteric modulators of GABA-mediated chloride current intensities at GABA(A) receptors, were compared with those of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol. A single administration of clozapine (1.25-20 mg/kg, IP), but not of haloperidol (0.1 or 0.5 mg/kg, IP), induced dose- and time-dependent increases in the concentrations of progesterone, AP, and THDOC in the cerebral cortex and striatum of rats. Clozapine (at 10 mg/kg, but not at lower doses) also increased the concentrations of these steroids as well as that of corticosterone in plasma in intact rats, but failed to increase the cortical concentrations of AP and THDOC in adrenalectomized-orchidectomized rats. An acute challenge with clozapine (10 mg/kg), administered 48 h after the termination of daily treatment with the same dose for 19 days, still increased the cortical concentrations of progesterone, AP, and THDOC. These results suggest that the clozapine-induced increases in neuroactive steroid concentrations in the brain may contribute to the atypical pharmacological profile of this antipsychotic drug.     

Potentiation of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in rats: pharmacological evaluation of the procedure as a model for detecting antipsychotic activity

Prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex – whereby presentation of a weak prepulse preceding a startling pulse diminishes the amplitude of the startle reflex – is disrupted by dopamine (DA) agonists; this disruption can be reversed by antipsychotics. There are also some indications in the literature that a few antipsychotics (most notably clozapine and haloperidol) may, on their own, have effects opposite to those of DA agonists, i.e. may enhance PPI. In order to explore these antipsychotic-induced potentiations of PPI more thoroughly, we assessed, in Sprague-Dawley rats, the effects of IP administration of various clinically effective antipsychotics in a PPI procedure with levels of PPI (ranging from 5 to about 40%) low enough to facilitate detection of PPI-potentiating effects of drugs. Both clozapine (5–20 mg/kg) and haloperidol (0.25–1 mg/kg) robustly and dose-dependently potentiated PPI. A similar effect was not seen with risperidone (0.1–1 mg/kg) or with the three substituted benzamides amisulpride (10–60 mg/kg), raclopride (0.1–3 mg/kg) and remoxipride (1–10 mg/kg). As risperidone is known to have prominent 5-HT₂ antagonistic activity, these results do not indicate a role for 5-HT₂ receptors in the clozapine and haloperidol PPI-enhancing effects. The absence of effects with the benzamides and with risperidone, at doses with known anti-dopaminergic activity, suggests that DA antagonist activity is not involved. The demonstration that prazosin (3–20 mg/kg), a non-antipsychotic with α₁ adrenoceptor antagonistic properties, dose-dependently potentiated PPI indicates that α₁ receptors might mediate the clozapine and haloperidol PPI-enhancing activity. Additionally, the finding that diazepam (1–10 mg/kg) did not enhance, but on the contrary reduced PPI, argues against a sedation- or general depressant-mediated effect of clozapine, haloperidol and prazosin. The negative results with four clinically active antipsychotics (risperidone and the benzamides), and the positive result with the non-antipsychotic prazosin, indicate that this PPI-enhancing procedure has poor predictive validity as a screening tool for potential antipsychotics. Received: 14 November 1996/Final version: 6 February 1997     

Atypical antipsychotics and a Src kinase inhibitor (PP1) prevent cortical injury produced by the psychomimetic, noncompetitive NMDA receptor antagonist MK-801.

Noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists such as phencyclidine, ketamine, and MK-801 produce schizophrenia-like psychosis in humans. The same NMDA antagonists injure retrosplenial cortical neurons in adult rats. We examined the effects of atypical antipsychotics and an inhibitor of nonreceptor tyrosine kinase pp60 (Src) on the cortical injury produced by MK-801. An atypical antipsychotic (either clozapine, ziprasidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, or risperidone) or vehicle was administered to adult female Sprague-Dawley rats. PP1 (Src inhibitor), PP3 (nonfunctional analog of PP1) or vehicle (DMSO) was administered to another group of animals. After pretreatment, animals were injected with MK-801, killed 24 h after the MK-801, and injury to retrosplenial cortex assessed by neuronal Hsp70 protein expression. All atypical antipsychotics examined significantly attenuated MK-801-induced cortical damage. PP1 protected compared to vehicle, whereas PP3 did not protect. The ED50s (decrease injury by 50%) were as follows: PP1 <0.1 mg/kg; olanzapine 0.8 mg/kg; risperdal 1 mg/kg; clozapine 3 mg/kg; ziprasidone 32 mg/kg; and quetiapine 45 mg/kg. The data show that the atypical antipsychotics tested as well as a Src kinase inhibitor prevent the injury produced by the psychomimetic MK-801, and the potency of the atypical antipsychotics for preventing cortical injury was roughly similar to the potency of these drugs for treating psychosis in patients.     

Chlorpromazine as a discriminative stimulus in rats: Generalization to typical and atypical antipsychotics

The discriminative stimulus properties of the typical antipsychotic chlorpromazine were examined in a two‐lever drug discrimination procedure for food reward. Six of nine rats readily acquired the discrimination between 1.0 mg/kg chlorpromazine (i.p.) and vehicle in a mean of 29.7 training sessions. The chlorpromazine generalization curve was dose‐dependent and yielded an ED₅₀ of 0.305 mg/kg (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.201–0.463 mg/kg). The chlorpromazine cue generalized to the atypical antipsychotics clozapine (ED₅₀ for the clozapine curve was 0.258 mg/kg [95% CI = 0.047–1.420 mg/kg]) and olanzapine (ED₅₀ for the olanzapine curve was 0.199 mg/kg [95% CI = 0.076–0.522 mg/kg]) and to the typical antipsychotic thioridazine (ED₅₀ for the thioridazine curve was 3.103 mg/kg [95% CI = 1.993–4.832 mg/kg]). Haloperidol (a typical antipsychotic) and raclopride (an atypical antipsychotic) did not substitute for chlorpromazine. It is clear from the present results that the discriminative stimulus properties of chlorpromazine share similarities both with the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and olanzapine and with the typical antipsychotic thioridazine. The extent to which the discriminative stimulus properties of antipsychotic drugs reflect or are predictive of their therapeutic effects in schizophrenic patients remains unclear. Drug Dev. Res. 48:38–44, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Potentiation of olanzapine substitution in rats discriminating clozapine by the D2/3 agonist quinpirole

The D2/3 agonist (+)-4-propyl-9-hydroxynaphthoxazine (PHNO) has been reported to enhance the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine and attenuate olanzapine-induced response suppression in monkeys. These data suggest that the relatively marked D2/3 antagonist actions of olanzapine limit its substitution for clozapine. The work reported here replicated and extended these findings. Twelve rats were trained to discriminate clozapine (5 mg/kg, intraperitoneal) from vehicle in an FR30 quantal food rewarded assay. The substitution curve for olanzapine (0-2.5 mg/kg) was then computed after treatment with either vehicle or a high dose (0.1 mg/kg) of the D2/3 agonist quinpirole. The olanzapine substitution curve was shifted significantly 5.2-fold in parallel to the left by quinpirole. Olanzapine suppressed responding significantly, but this effect was not attenuated or enhanced by quinpirole, which suppressed responding itself. Thus antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors clearly limit the ability of olanzapine to substitute for clozapine. These findings suggest that the clozapine versus vehicle discrimination is probably a bioassay for agents that resemble clozapine but which do not necessarily induce D2/3 antagonism. This discrimination may therefore not specifically detect clozapine-like antipsychotics, although it may be of value in developing such antipsychotics. The low discriminability of antipsychotics in general may be because antagonist actions at D2/3 receptors limit incentive salience in discrimination assays. These data are compatible with recent theorizing that therapeutic actions of antipsychotics in schizophrenia involve D2/3 receptor-mediated attenuation of stimulus salience.     

Atypical antipsychotics,clozapine and sulpiride do not antagonise amphetamine-induced stereotyped locomotion

An automated tracking system which converted an animal's path between quadrants of a circular open field into a series of trips was used to analyse stereotyped locomotion in amphetamine treated rats. Amphetamine (3.5 mg/kg) increased the horizontal distance moved and the number and proportion of thigmotaxic trips around the perimeter of the apparatus (length 4 trips). To investigate the hypothesis that classic antipsychotics, but not atypical antipsychotics, would antagonise the repetitive boundary patrolling associated with amphetamine-induced hyperactivity, animals were pretreated with haloperidol (0.01, 0.025, 0.05, 0.075 mg/kg), clozapine (5, 10, 20 mg/kg) or (±)sulpiride (10, 20, 50 mg/kg) 30 min before 3.5 mg/kg amphetamine. The results showed that the classic antipsychotic haloperidol antagonised both hyperactivity and the increased proportion of length 4 trips. In marked contrast, the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and sulpiride antagonised hyperactivity but did not reduce the proportion of length 4 trips. The inability of atypical antipsychotics to reduce the repetitive boundary patrolling associated with amphetamine-induced hyperactivity is consistent with the action of these drugs on other forms of amphetamine-induced stereotyped behaviour, and indicates that locomotor routes under amphetamine are stereotyped. The measurement of trip lengths provides a sensitive tool for examining drug action on the spatial distribution of open field locomotion.     

The effect of chronic treatment with clozapine and haloperidol on stimulus control by DOM

The present study investigated the effects of chronic treatment with the atypical antipsychotic, clozapine, or the typical antipsychotic, haloperidol, on the stimulus properties of 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine ([-]-DOM) in rats trained to discriminate [-]-DOM (0.3 mg/kg; 75 min pre-treatment time) from vehicle. As compared with control values, treatment with clozapine (25 mg/kg.d) for 7 d caused a statistically significant 57% reduction in [-]-DOM-appropriate responding. Unlike clozapine, treatment with haloperidol (1 mg/kg.d) for 7 d did not affect the stimulus properties of [-]-DOM. These findings demonstrate that a functionally significant decrease in 5-HT2A receptor-mediated activity is a unique component of the in-vivo response to chronic treatment with clozapine but not haloperidol and, therefore, might account for some of the clinical differences associated with atypical antipsychotics.     

Olanzapine,an atypical antipsychotic,increases rates of punished responding in pigeons

The effects of olanzapine [LY 170053; 2-methyl-4-(4-methyl-1-piperazinyl)-10H-thieno[2, 3b][1,5]benzodiazepine), a potential atypical antipsychotic, were determined in pigeons whose keypeck responding was punished. These effects were compared to the anxiolytic agents chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital, and to other antipsychotic agents. Keypeck behavior was maintained under a multiple FR30 FR30 schedule, signalled by white and red stimulus lights, respectively. Each component of the schedule alternated every 3 min with a 30-s timeout. During the white keylight component, responding was maintained by food presentation. During the red keylight component, responding was maintained by food and simultaneously suppressed by electric shock presentation, with response rates being only about 5% of those during the white stimulus light. Olanzapine (0.01–1.0 mg/kg) increased punished responding at doses below those which had an effect on unpunished responding. Clozapine (0.01–1.0 mg/kg), ritanserin (0.1–3.0 mg/kg), and, to a lesser extent, risperidone (0.1–1.0 mg/kg) were also effective at increasing punished responding. Generally, the maximum effect seen with olanzapine was equal to that seen with ritanserin, and it exceeded that seen with clozapine. However, these effects were generally less than those seen with chlordiazepoxide and pentobarbital. Haloperidol (0.01–0.1 mg/kg) was completely without effect on punished responding, while it caused decreases in unpunished behavior. These results provide further evidence that olanzapine has a profile in behavioral tests unlike the typical antipsychotic haloperidol. Moreover, this profile is similar to clozapine, a clinically effective antipsychotic with an atypical profile.     

Anti-cataleptic effects of clozapine, but not olanzapine and quetiapine, on SCH 23390- or raclopride-induced catalepsy in rats.

The present study investigated potential anti-cataleptic properties of the prototype atypical antipsychotic clozapine and two newly developed atypical antipsychotics, olanzapine and quetiapine, which are structurally related and display similar pharmacological profiles to clozapine. Clozapine (2.5 mg kg(-1), s.c.), but not olanzapine (2.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.) and quetiapine (20.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.), blocked catalepsy induced either by the dopamine D(1/5) receptor antagonist SCH 23390 (50.0 microg kg(-1), s.c) or the selective dopamine D(2/3) receptor antagonist raclopride (4.0 mg kg(-1), s.c.). Such findings are consistent with the beneficial effects of clozapine in the management of drug-induced psychosis in parkinsonian patients, and suggest that neither olanzapine nor quetiapine may be a safe alternative to clozapine in this field. Furthermore, the results indicate that clozapine has a unique pharmacological profile that distinguishes it from olanzapine and quetiapine. The mechanisms underlying anti-cataleptic or anti-parkinsonian properties of clozapine are unclear but may be related to dopamine D(1) receptor agonism of clozapine.