Antilymphoblast globulin, cyclosporine, and steroids in cadaveric renal transplantation

In order to avoid cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity and rejection, especially during the early posttransplant periods, different immunosuppression regimens have been adopted. A prospective trial was conducted to evaluate the benefits of initially low CsA doses associated with antilymphoblast globulin and steroids in the first days after transplant, in comparison with higher doses of CsA and steroids. Between 1/86 and 1/88, two groups of first-cadaver renal transplant recipients were documented based on the immunosuppression regimen used. In group A (n = 50), oral CsA was started at 8 mg/kg/day and subsequent doses adjusted to maintain CsA whole-blood levels between 300 and 600 ng/ml. Horse ALG at 10 mg/kg was given the day after transplant and on alternate days to a maximum of 6 doses. After 3 doses, ALG was stopped if CsA blood levels were equal to or greater than 400 ng/ml. ALG dosage modifications were made in order to maintain peripheral CD3+ cells between 10 and 20%. Prednisone was given at 0.25 mg/kg/day. In group B (n = 50), oral CsA was started at 15 mg/kg/day. The CsA whole-blood levels were maintained between 300 and 800 ng/ml. Prednisone was administered at 0.5 mg/kg/day. The incidence of postransplant renal failure was the same in both groups (16%), but the duration of oliguria was lower in group A than in group B (3.3 +/- 2 vs. 16.2 +/- 10.7 days, P less than 0.05), as well as the incidence of acute rejection during the first 3 months (18% vs. 40%, P = 0.01. The cumulative doses of CsA and steroids were significantly lower in group A than in group B. Mean serum creatinine at 6 and 12 months remained similar in both groups. There was no difference between the 2 groups in the incidence of infection. There was no mortality in either group. The actuarial graft survival was significantly higher in group A than in group B at one (100% vs. 94%), two (97% vs. 87%), and three years (89% vs. 73%), respectively (P = 0.041). In summary, the triple regimen using simultaneously low-dose CsA, ALG, and steroids minimizes early graft dysfunction, provides efficient immunosuppression without severe infections, and gives good long-term patient and graft survival.     

Antilymphocyte globulin versus OKT3 induction therapy in cadaveric kidney transplantation: a prospective randomized study.

Different induction therapies have been used in renal transplantation to avoid cyclosporine (CsA) nephrotoxicity and early acute graft rejection. This study compares the efficacy of a short course of prophylactic OKT3 to that of antilymphocyte globulin (ALG) in preventing acute renal allograft rejection when administered concomitantly with CsA and steroids. Between March 1988 and December 1990, 140 first-cadaver renal transplant recipients were randomly allocated to two immunosuppression groups--ALG group (n = 68): ALG 15 mg/kg just before transplant surgery, ALG 12 mg/kg the first day after transplant, followed by four doses of 10 mg/kg on alternate days; and OKT3 group (n = 72): OKT3 5 mg just before transplant, followed by four doses of 5 mg/d. Both groups included low-dose CsA and steroids. The incidence of rejection during the first 3 months after transplantation was 15% in the ALG group and 19% in the OKT3 group (NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of patients free of rejection at 2 years was 85% in the ALG group and 77% in the OKT3 group (NS). The 3-year actuarial graft survival was 82% and 85% (NS), and 3-year patient survival was 97% and 98% (NS), in the ALG and OKT3 groups, respectively. These results indicate that the concomitant association of CsA and ALG or OKT3 constitutes a safe and effective therapeutic strategy that provides a low incidence of rejection and gives good results for patient and graft survival.     

Impact of the variability of cyclosporin A trough levels on long-term renal allograft function.

BACKGROUND: Among renal allograft recipients, there is a considerable variability in cyclosporin A (CsA) trough levels. Some of the CsA metabolites are pharmacologically active. The variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels may contribute to the fact that long-term renal allograft survival is still not satisfactory. In a retrospective, single-centre study, we investigated the influence of the variability of polyclonal CsA trough levels on long-term renal allograft function. METHODS: Patients (n=381) received double immunosuppression consisting of CsA and methylprednisolone (MP). For each patient the CsA coefficient of variation (CCV) and the mean CsA trough level during the observation period (5 years) were calculated. Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, patients were divided into two groups: group I, CCV <28.05%, n=231; group II, CCV >28.05%, n=150. Additionally, patients were divided into three groups according to their mean CsA trough level: group A, <270 ng/ml, n=50; group B, 270-370 ng/ml, n=282; group C: >370 ng/ml, n=49. RESULTS: Compared to group I, patients in group II experienced a higher incidence of acute rejection episodes (40.7% vs 29.4%, P=0.02), reduced 5-year graft survival (81.1% vs 93.3%, P=0.002), and higher serum creatinine levels (1.7+/-1.2 mg/dl vs 1.4+/-0.5 mg/dl, P=0.03). In patients with low mean CsA trough levels, the incidence of acute rejection episodes was elevated (group A vs B, 50.0% vs 30.9%, P=0.008) and 5-year graft survival was reduced (group A vs B, 79.8% vs 89.5%, P=0.005). Multiple logistic regression analysis confirmed that the risk of graft failure within 5 years after transplantation was markedly elevated in group II (RR: 6.2, P=0.013) and in group A (RR: 8.9, P=0.008). Whereas the effect of CCV on 5-year graft survival was still evident in patients with normal or high mean CsA trough levels (>270 ng/ml, 81.9% vs 94.8%, P=0.0005), graft survival was independent from CCV in patients with low mean CsA trough levels (<270 ng/ml, 77.0% vs 81.7%, P=NS). CONCLUSIONS: Both, the intra-individual variability and the mean of polyclonal CsA trough levels influence long-term renal allograft survival. Targeting at sufficiently high mean CsA levels with a low intra-individual variability may help to further improve long-term renal allograft survival.     

An increased incidence of late acute rejection episodes in cadaver renal allograft recipients given azathioprine, cyclosporine, and prednisone

We studied the incidence of biopsy-proven, acute rejection episodes occurring after 1 year posttransplant in cadaver renal allograft recipients. The 328 patients evaluated were given three immunosuppressive drug protocols. Group I (transplanted 9/80-6/84) (n = 75) received azathioprine, prednisone (P), and antilymphoblast globulin; group II (transplanted 9/80-6/84) (n = 83) received cyclosporine and P; group III (transplanted 7/84-12/86) (n = 170) received ALG, AZA, CsA, and P (sequential therapy). The incidence of first acute rejection episodes occurring up to 1 year posttransplant was 55% in group I and 35% in groups II and III. The incidence of late (greater than 1 year) acute rejection episodes was 6.5% in group I, 2.5% in group II, and 9.5% in group III (group II vs. III, P = 0.02). In group III, 50% of the late rejections were first, 44% second, and 6% third. The primary etiologies of this increased incidence of late acute rejection may have included subtherapeutic CsA levels and lower P doses. Sequential immunosuppressive therapy has been shown to be advantageous in the first posttransplant year. However, unless adequate immunosuppression is maintained, this approach can be associated with a significantly increased incidence of late acute rejection.     

Improved results using OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function

Delayed graft function remains a major problem in cadaveric renal allograft transplantation. We have used 2 different immunosuppressive induction regimens in patients with delayed graft function. The first regimen, used in 40 patients from January 1985 to December 1986, consisted of CsA (8 mg/kg/day, orally within 48 hr of cadaveric renal transplantation regardless of graft function), azathioprine (1.5-2.5 mg/kg/day), and steroids (methylprednisolone 375 mg on day 0, then prednisone tapered to 30 mg/day by day 10 with slow tapering to 7.5-10 mg/day over the first 6 months after transplantation). A second regimen, used from January 1987 to March 1989, employed the same doses of azathioprine and steroids; however, OKT3 (5 mg i.v./day for 7-21 days) was administered in the 34 patients who had delayed graft function. CsA was withheld until ATN resolved. The use of OKT3 as induction immunosuppression in patients with ATN led to a significant increase in 1-year graft survival (80% vs. 55%) while markedly decreasing the incidence of rejection episodes (44% vs. 82%) and the duration of nonfunction (9.4 vs. 14.9 days). There were 5 CMV infections in patients treated with OKT3. Antibodies to OKT3 developed in only 1 of 34 patients treated with OKT3. Five of 7 patients who received a second course of OKT3 successfully reversed the rejection episode. Patient survival (89%) was the same in the 2 groups. The benefit of OKT3 on long-term graft survival appears to stem from elimination of early rejection episodes that may be difficult to diagnose in a poorly functioning allograft. We conclude that OKT3 induction provides superior results over CsA induction at doses given in renal allograft recipients with delayed graft function without a significant increase in morbidity or mortality and permits the reuse of OKT3 for treatment of rejection in most cases.     

Early acute rejection does not affect chronic allograft nephropathy and death censored graft failure

BACKGROUND: Even with the development of modern immunosuppression, an acute rejection episode is a major complication after renal transplantation. Acute rejection episodes have been used as clinical indicators for chronic allograft nephropathy and graft loss. We investigated the timing and frequency of acute rejection episodes in relation to long-term graft survival and chronic allograft nephropathy. METHODS: The Long Term Efficacy and Safety Surveillance study of transplant patients receiving cyclosporin (Neoral) included 1706 adult renal transplants (1995 to 2003) with a functioning graft for at least 1 year. The impact on death-censored long-term graft survival was evaluated for acute rejection episodes (single or multiple) within 3 months, at 3 to 6 months, at 6 to 12 months, or at over 1 year posttransplant. A stepwise binary logistic regression was employed to identify independent risk factors for the time to occurrence of an acute rejection episode. RESULTS: An acute rejection episode occurring within 3 months posttransplantation had no effect on either death-censored long-term graft failure (P=.2157) or chronic allograft nephropathy (P=.9331). However, an acute rejection episode occurring at 1 year or later posttransplantation was significantly associated with death censored long-term graft failure (P <.0001) and chronic allograft nephropathy (P <.0001). The numbers of HLA-DR mismatches and younger recipient ages were independent risk factors for early acute rejection. CONCLUSION: Among patients whose graft survives at least 12 months, an early acute rejection episode within 3 months posttransplant was not associated with either death-censored long-term graft survival or chronic allograft nephropathy among adults treated with cyclosporin. However, an acute rejection episode occurring at 1 year or later posttransplantation showed a positive association with death-censored long-term graft survival or chronic allograft nephropathy. Lower numbers of HLA-DR mismatches sum to reduce the occurrence of acute rejection and the hospitalization time.     

Improved renal function in sirolimus-treated renal transplant patients after early cyclosporine elimination

BACKGROUND: Sirolimus (Rapamune; SRL) in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients. This study evaluated whether renal function could be improved by elimination of CsA from an SRL-based regimen. METHODS: This phase 2, open-label, controlled, randomized study was conducted at 17 centers in the United States and Europe. Two hundred forty-six first cadaveric renal allograft recipients were enrolled, and 197 were randomized to full-dose CsA (microemulsion) plus fixed-dose SRL (2 mg/day; group A, n=97) or reduced-dose CsA plus concentration-controlled SRL (troughs 10-20 ng/mL; group B, n=100). Most patients with acute tubular necrosis-delayed graft function that resolved later than posttransplantation day 7 were not randomized but were assigned to a third group (nonrandomized, n=49) and received up to 5 mg per day of SRL as part of their individualized treatment regimen. All patients received standard doses of corticosteroids. At the end of posttransplantation month 2, eligible patients (those not treated for rejection within 3 weeks) in group B had CsA tapered and eliminated over the subsequent 4 to 6 weeks. RESULTS: At 12 months after transplantation, renal function was significantly better in the CsA-elimination arm. In patients who were on therapy and who had not experienced an acute rejection episode before month 6, serum creatinine level was significantly lower (1.38 mg/dL vs. 1.82 mg/dL, P < 0.001) and calculated glomerular filtration rate (Nankivell method) was significantly higher (73.5 mL/min vs. 57.1 mL/min, P < 0.001) in group B than in group A. In the intention-to-treat population, rates of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection at 12 months were similar between groups A and B (18.6% vs. 22.0%, respectively; P = 0.598). In addition, graft survival (92.8% and 95.0%) and patient survival (96.9% and 96.0%) rates at 12 months were not significantly different between groups A and B, respectively. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between black and nonblack recipients within treatment groups in terms of rejection rates and graft survival at 12 months. Black recipients in group B had better serum creatinine levels at 12 months compared with black recipients in group A (1.55 mg/dL vs. 2.69 mg/dL, respectively, P = 0.011), as did nonblack recipients in group B compared with nonblack recipients in group A (1.53 mg/dL vs. 1.75 mg/dL, respectively, P = 0.055). Black patients in group A had higher mean serum creatinine levels (2.69 mg/dL) than nonblack patients in group A (1.75 mg/dL, P = 0.028). Hypertension, edema, hypomagnesemia, and dyspnea were reported significantly less frequently in patients randomly assigned to undergo CsA elimination compared with patients in group A (P < 0.05); group B patients had a significantly greater (P < 0.05) incidence of abnormal liver function tests, diarrhea, hypokalemia, and thrombocytopenia. CONCLUSION: Concentration-controlled SRL with early elimination of CsA is safe and results in improved renal function. Reduced exposure to CsA does not result in a clinically significant increase in the incidence of acute rejection episodes. This is true for both black and nonblack recipients. SRL may be used to reduce the exposure of renal allograft recipients to the nephrotoxic effects of CsA.     

Sequential antilymphocyte globulin/cyclosporine immunosuppression in cadaveric renal transplantation. Effect of duration of ALG therapy

Recent studies have documented the efficacy of quadruple immunotherapy with sequential ALG/cyclosporine in cadaveric renal transplantation. However, the exact role of ALG in this regimen is controversial. Over a four-year period, we performed 429 cadaveric renal transplants (367 primary, 62 retransplants) with prednisone, azathioprine, and the sequential use of Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin (MALG) and CsA. ALG therapy was divided into three protocols: true sequential (n = 259, mean no. days of ALG = 8.2); extended (defined as sequential MALG/CsA continued for 14 days irrespective of renal function or CsA level, n = 103, mean no. days of ALG = 14.1); and therapeutic (continued MALG therapy for early breakthrough rejection, n = 67 [15.6%], mean no. days of ALG = 17.2). The study groups were comparable and retrospectively analyzed in multivariate fashion for 15 variables. Requirement for postoperative dialysis was equivalent (14%) in both sequential and extended ALG groups. Extended ALG therapy failed to reduce the incidence of acute rejection (46.5% vs. 40.4% with true sequential therapy). Prolonging the duration of ALG treatment (greater than 10 days) was associated with a higher risk of infection. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the use of OKT3 after ALG accounted for the higher infection rate. Duration of ALG therapy had no impact on patient or graft survival after a mean follow-up interval of 20 months. We recommended a quadruple immunosuppressive strategy in cadaveric renal transplantation with sequential MALG/CsA to minimize early allograft dysfunction and to achieve excellent patient and graft survival. MALG therapy should be stopped after renal function is documented and CsA levels are therapeutic. Further ALG therapy offers no immunologic advantage and may place the patient at high risk for infection if OKT3 rescue therapy is required.     

Tacrolimus in induction immunosuppressive treatment in renal transplantation: comparison with cyclosporine

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy and safety of induction immunosuppression therapies based on tacrolimus or cyclosporine (CsA) in kidney transplantation. The 240 kidney allograft recipients were divided into two groups: group 1 (n=94) received tacrolimus (.01 mg/kg per day), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d); and group 2 (n=146) CsA (6 mg/kg per day), MMF (2 g/d), and steroids (30 mg/d). Antilymphocyte serum was administered in cases of acute tubular necrosis. The acute rejection rate was higher among group 2 (30.6%) compared with group 1 patients (12.2%) (P=.001). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of age, gender, body surface area, serologic virus markers (in donor and recipient), baseline creatinine levels, cause of death, HLA incompatibilities, response to acute tubular necrosis, and number of dialysis sessions. We conclude that both immunosuppressive regimens are effective and safe in kidney transplantation. The survival rates of patients and grafts were similar, but the incidence and degree of acute rejection events were reduced in group 1; this finding may forecast a decreased incidence of chronic renal allograft nephropathy.     

The role of the protocol biopsies in renal allograft recipients

Subclinical rejection and long-term cyclosporine nephrotoxicity are well-known risk factors of chronic allograft nephropathy. In a prospective study 32 low-risk patients were randomized to either a reduced CsA dose (5 mg/kg/d) and daclizumab (group A, n = 16) for 7 months posttransplant with subsequent CsA tapering/withdrawal, or to a normal CsA dose (10 mg/kg/day) without daclizumab (group B, n = 16). Both groups received MMF and prednisone. Protocol biopsies were obtained at engraftment and 3 and 12 months after Tx. The number of rejection episodes was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints were: renal function, histological parameters related to CsA, and serum levels of TGF-beta and PDGF-BB. A low incidence of clinically suspected rejection episodes was observed (19% in group A and 12.4% in group B; P = NS). Although protocol biopsies showed 12 subclinical rejection episodes (six in group A, six in group B), serum creatinine levels were not different between the examined groups at 3 months. However, at 12 months, there was a statistically improved mean creatinine level in group A patients (1.2 mg/dL +/- 0.5 in group A vs 1.54 mg/dL in group B; P <.05). Chronic histopathologic changes were significant for biopsies at 3 and 12 months in both groups compared to the baseline findings for protocol biopsies (with no differences between groups, or between 3 and 12 months in both groups). Serum TGF-beta and PDGF-BB did not differ between the groups. Protocol biopsies may be useful to monitor safety and efficiency of new immunosuppressive protocols. Immunosuppressive regimens with low CsA doses followed by the drug's complete withdrawal seem to be efficient and safe in low-risk kidney allograft recipients.     

Long-term results of a prospective randomized study comparing two immunosuppressive regimens, one with and one without CsA, in low-risk renal transplant recipients

Due to the nephrotoxicity of cyclosporin A (CsA), its benefit on long-term graft survival remains controversial, especially in low-risk patients. Here we report the 12-year results of a calcineurin-inhibitor-free regimen. One hundred and seventeen low-risk kidney recipients were prospectively randomized to maintenance therapy with either a combination of azathioprine and prednisone (group NoCsA, n=58), or with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone (group CsA, n=59). Both groups received induction therapy with anti-lymphocyte globulins (ALG). Twelve-year patient survival was 75% and 82.5% in the CsA and NoCsA groups, respectively [ P= not significant (NS)]. Twelve-year graft survival was 59% and 56% ( P=NS) in the CsA and NoCsA groups, respectively (NS). Transplant rejection rates were similar in both groups. Mean serum creatinine levels after 10 years were 161 and 136 micromol/l in the CsA and NoCsA groups, respectively. Rejection-free patients of the CsA group had poorer renal function (168 micromol/l) than those of the NoCsA group (121 micromol/l; P=0.0060). We concluded that a 12-year graft survival of 56% and a graft half-life of 15 years can be achieved without the primary use of a calcineurin inhibitor in low-risk patients receiving ALG. Patients treated with CsA had poorer graft function at 12 years.     

Randomized trial of conversion from mycophenolate mofetil to azathioprine 6 months after renal allograft transplantation.

BACKGROUND: In the first year after renal allograft transplantation, triple therapy immunosuppression with cyclosporin (CsA), prednisone (P), and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is superior to a triple therapy treatment that includes azathioprine (AZA) instead of MMF. Whether long-term treatment with CsA-P-MMF is better than treatment with CsA-P-AZA is a matter of debate, as 3-year graft survival is similar in MMF- and AZA-treated patients. The purpose of the present study was to examine the short-term effect of changing MMF to AZA in low-risk renal allograft recipients 6 months after transplantation. METHOD: This was a randomized, open-label single-centre study, recruiting 48 low risk renal allograft recipients on CsA-P-MMF therapy 6 months after transplantation, comparing the outcome with continued MMF treatment (2 g b.i.d.) (group A, n=22) or switching MMF to AZA (1 mg/kg) treatment (group B, n=26). RESULTS: The outcome after a 6-months follow-up of patients in group A and group B was similar. Treatment failure rates (defined as clinically diagnosed acute rejection episodes) were 4.5% in group A and 3.8% in group B. There were no patient deaths and no graft failures during the 6-months observation period. Graft function was excellent and similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Replacing MMF with AZA 6 months after transplantation in low-risk renal allograft recipients is safe and is not associated with altered graft function in the short term.     

Sequential antilymphoblast globulin and cyclosporine for renal transplantation

The nephrotoxic effects of cyclosporine (CsA) seem to be augmented by co-existing renal injury. A high rate of prolonged delayed function (acute tubular necrosis [ATN]) and non-function (NF) has been associated with the use of CsA prior to and following renal transplantation. Cyclosporine has also been associated with a slower recovery of allograft function and poor baseline renal function even in allografts that function immediately compared with conventionally treated recipients. In 1983 we hypothesized that the rate of ATN and NF following renal transplantation could be decreased and more normal kidney function achieved if renal injury was resolved before adding the nephrotoxic effects of CsA. A group of 300 nonsplenectomized, uremic recipients have received 304 renal transplants and have been initially immunosuppressed with azathioprine, prednisone, and Minnesota antilymphoblast globulin (ALG) prior to starting maintenance CsA and prednisone. The incidence of NF has been 1.9% and the development of ATN has been 7.6% following transplantation with sequential use of ALG and CsA. Other benefits to the renal recipient have also occurred with use of this immunotherapy protocol. Renal allograft survival for recipients of first, second, and third renal allografts has been higher than that generally reported with cyclosporine and prednisone alone. Rejection episodes have been infrequent during the first six months posttransplant, as 75% and 62% of first and second renal allograft recipients have remained rejection-free. Clinically significant infectious complications were infrequent. No cadaver recipient has developed a lymphoma. Moreover, the initial hospitalization following transplantation with sequential ALG/CsA has been short and generally uncomplicated. We conclude that sequential ALG/CsA following renal transplantation provides excellent early posttransplant immunosuppression while avoiding the nephrotoxic effects of CsA and also provides the steroid and infection-sparing benefits derived from maintenance CsA therapy.     

Risk factors for second renal allografts immunosuppressed with cyclosporine

Second renal allograft survival rates are lower than those of primary allografts. For recipients immunosuppressed with azathioprine, prednisone, and Minnesota ALG (conventional immunosuppression), risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival have been identified: age greater than 40, cadaver donor, less than 6 months between primary graft loss and retransplantation, duration of primary graft function (6 months or 1 year, depending on the study), high peak panel-reactive antibody, number of human leukocyte antigen mismatches, and delayed graft function. In this study, we used a multivariate analysis to identify risk factors associated with decreased second graft survival in patients who did or did not receive cyclosporine. Results were compared with primary graft survival rates. Risk factors for patients receiving conventional immunosuppression were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.01 vs. either rejection less than 6 months or nonimmunologic loss); (b) cadaver donor (P = 0.005 vs. living related); and (c) interval between primary graft loss and retransplantation of greater than or equal to 6 months (P = 0.05 vs. less than 6 months). For CsA, risk factors that most decreased second graft survival were: (a) primary graft loss caused by rejection less than 6 months (P = 0.11 vs. nonimmunologic loss); (b) conventional immunosuppression for the primary graft (P = 0.08 vs. CsA immunosuppression); and (c) a peak PRA of greater than or equal to 21 (P = 0.14 vs. peak PRA of 1-20). For second graft recipients immunosuppressed with CsA, primary graft loss to either rejection greater than 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes was not a risk factor for second graft survival. These data extend the recent reports of other investigators by identifying risk factors for retransplant recipients treated with CsA and by demonstrating that subgroups of patients in the retransplant population can be retransplanted without additional risk (i.e., their second graft survival rates are similar to primary graft survival rates). This may become more important if, in the future, organ distribution is based on graft survival data. If so, our data would support retransplantation in patients who are immunosuppressed with CsA, especially those who lost their primary graft to either rejection greater than or equal to 6 months posttransplant or nonimmunologic causes; who receive living related grafts; and who have a peak PRA of 1-20.     

1alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 shows strong and additive immunomodulatory effects with cyclosporine A in rat renal allotransplants.

BACKGROUND: Vitamin D3 and its metabolites have long been found to exert immunosuppressive effects both in vivo and in vitro. The present study investigated the effect of 1alpha,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol (1,25DHC) on vascularized renal allografts in rats. METHODS: Three days prior to transplantation, two groups of animals were subjected to 1,25DHC (1 microg/kg/day IP) and a low calcium diet, which was continued until the end of the experiments. Recipient organs were removed and single allografts were transplanted in a high responder strain combination (ACI --> Lewis). Following transplantation, low-dose cyclosporine A (3.2 mg/kg/day CsA) administration was started in two experimental groups of recipients (one group receiving 1,25 DHC additionally) whereas the control allograft recipients received no immunosuppression (control III). Graft survival and renal function was monitored until death or the end of experiments and allograft rejection was assessed histologically using the Banff classification. RESULTS: 1,25DHC significantly prolonged allograft survival in comparison to control III (9.6 +/- 1 vs. 5.7 +/- 0.2 days; P=0.009). In addition, a combination of 1,25DHC and low-dose CsA increased allograft survival compared to CsA administration alone (24 +/- 0.9 vs. 13 +/- 0.3 days; P=0.008). 1,25DHC preserved renal creatinine clearance and decreased proteinuria in comparison to control III, and the combination of 1,25DHC and low-dose CsA again showed an additive effect on preservation of renal function. 1,25DHC and low-dose CsA both decreased interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-12 expression levels in serum and allografts, and a combination treatment produced the strongest attenuation of IL-2 and IL-12 expression. In addition, 1,25DHC increased IL-4 and IL-10 expression levels in allografts, whereas CsA alone did not alter IL-4 and IL-10 expression. In contrast, combination of 1,25DHC and low-dose CsA showed a significant increase in IL-10 expression levels whereas IL-4 expression was not elevated. CONCLUSION: Monotherapy with 1,25DHC significantly prolongs survival of renal allografts and preserves graft function in rats. A combination of 1,25DHC and CsA caused an additive effect on graft survival with differential regulation of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines, as compared to 1,25DHC administration alone.     

Sirolimus reduces the incidence of acute rejection episodes despite lower cyclosporine doses in caucasian recipients of mismatched primary renal allografts: a phase II trial. Rapamune Study Group

BACKGROUND: The novel agent sirolimus (SRL; Rapamune; rapamycin) inhibits the immune response by a mechanism distinct from those of calcineurin antagonists or antimetabolites. This randomized, controlled, multicenter, single blind, phase II trial examined the combination of SRL, steroids, and full versus reduced doses of cyclosporine (CsA) for prophylaxis of acute renal allograft rejection. METHODS: A total of 149 recipients of mismatched cadaveric- or living-donor primary renal allografts were randomized into six groups. Three groups received placebo or 1 or 3 mg/m2/day SRL, as well as steroids and full-dose CsA (Sandimmune). Three groups received steroids, reduced-dose CsA (target trough level 50% of full-dose range), and 1, 3, or 5 mg/m2/day SRL. RESULTS: The incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection episodes within the first 6 months after transplant was reduced from 32.0% in the control group to 8.5% in patients receiving SRL (1 or 3 mg/m2/day) and full-dose Sandimmune CsA (P=0.018). Similar low rates of acute rejection episodes were observed among non-African-Americans, but not African-Americans, treated with SRL and reduced-dose Sandimmune CsA. Despite the augmented immunosuppression, 1-year patient and graft survival rates did not differ significantly across groups. Adverse effects attributable to CsA, including hypertension and new-onset diabetes mellitus, were not exacerbated by SRL. Except for an increased incidence of pneumonia among patients receiving full-dose CsA and 3 mg/m2/day SRL, the incidences of opportunistic infections were similar in all treatment groups. Although SRL produced more frequent, but reversible, hematological and lipid abnormalities, it had no apparent nephrotoxic effects to exacerbate CsA-induced renal dysfunction. CONCLUSIONS: SRL in combination with CsA and steroids not only lowers the incidence of biopsy-proven acute renal allograft rejection episodes, but also may permit CsA sparing, at least among Caucasian patients, without an increased risk of rejection.     

The incidence and impact of early rejection episodes on graft outcome in recipients of first cadaver kidney transplants.

The objective of this study was to define the incidence and significance of acute rejection occurring in the first year following transplantation. The influence of contemporary induction immunosuppression on rejection, as well as the effect of rejection on graft and patient loss, renal function, and maintenance immunosuppression during the first year in 110 recipients of first cadaver renal transplants were analyzed. All patients received CsA, Aza, and prednisone for 30 days with withdrawal of Aza at 30 days and then prednisone at 105 days; 57 patients were prospectively randomized to receive ALG (Merieux) until serum creatinine was less than 300 mumol/L. Short-term ALG administration did not influence the incidence, severity, nature, or outcome of rejection episodes. Fifty-five (50%) patients had at least 1 rejection in the first 90 days. All patients with delayed graft function and 7/8 (88%) sensitized patients (current PRA greater than 50%) had at least 1 rejection episode; 71% (n = 35) of all rejection episodes occurred in the first 30 days posttransplant. Patients rejection free at 90 days remained rejection free the entire first year. Graft loss was 18% for rejections in the first month, 13% for rejections occurring later (P = NS); 20% (n = 11) of patients had a second rejection and 1% (n = 2) had a third rejection. The risk of graft loss was 9% with a first rejection, 38% with a second rejection, and 50% with a third rejection. Of 12 (22%) rejections that were steroid resistant, 10 (83%) were reversed with OKT3. One-year graft survival for patients without rejection, with steroid-sensitive rejection, and with steroid-resistant rejection was 96%, 88% (P = ns), and 58% (P less than 0.001), respectively; 1 year SCr was 168 +/- 93, 196 +/- 77 (P = ns), and 268 +/- 96 microMol/L (P less than 0.05), respectively. Patients free of rejection and with stable renal function continued to do well on maintenance CsA monotherapy, and they were more likely to be on CsA monotherapy than those with rejection episodes (P less than 0.01).     

Cyclosporine toxicity: the effect of combined therapy using cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone

Forty-nine patients among 360 who received renal transplants under cyclosporine (CsA)/prednisone (Pred) immunosuppression required alteration of the immunosuppressive regimen because of intractable nephrotoxicity. Twenty-five patients, converted totally to azathioprine (Aza)/Pred, suffered intractable nephrotoxicity with no associated evidence suggesting ongoing rejection. The results with Aza/Pred conversion were disappointing because of an unacceptably high incidence of rejection and allograft loss. Twenty-four patients with intractable CsA nephrotoxicity were, therefore, treated using an alternative approach combining Aza with aggressive CsA dose reduction, and continued Pred therapy. All patients tolerated initiation of Aza without complication; allograft rejection was not common. Renal function improved for 23 of the 24 (96%) CsA/Aza/Pred patients with mean serum creatinine levels falling from 3.5 +/- 0.5 mg/dL to 2.2 +/- 0.4 mg/dL after a mean follow-up of 14 months (P less than .001). Among 18 patients observed at least 12 months, seven (39%) enjoyed serum creatinine values less than or equal to 2 mg/dL. Nine CsA/Aza/Pred-treated patients (37.5%) required hospitalization because of infectious complications, all of which resolved with temporary reduction of immunosuppression and specific antimicrobial therapy when indicated. One patient sustained acute allograft rejection as a result of patient noncompliance, and one patient on a seemingly appropriate CsA/Aza/Pred dose responded initially to steroid pulse antirejection therapy; however, renal function again worsened. Two patients developed progressive renal dysfunction due to chronic rejection, and returned to dialysis 13 and 17 months, respectively, following initiation of CsA/Aza/Pred. Overall, the actuarial graft survival for CsA/Aza/Pred-treated patients was 100% at 1 year, and 84% at 2 years.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The long-term effects of prophylactic OKT3 monoclonal antibody in cadaver kidney transplantation--a single-center, prospective, randomized study.

We conducted a randomized, prospective study to determine the long-term effects of prophylactic OKT3 in cadaveric renal transplantation. In the first group of patients (n = 56) OKT3 (5 mg/day) was administered for the first 14 postoperative days in association with azathioprine (AZA) and low-dose steroids, cyclosporine (CsA) being introduced on day 11. The other group of patients (n = 52) received CsA from the first POD, together with AZA and steroids. Both protocols were identical from POD 14 on. The total number of infections was higher in OKT3 patients (124/1455 patient-months [P-M] vs. 68/1320 in CsA patients, P less than 0.001) without impact on patient survival (94.5% in OKT3 vs. 93% in CsA patients). OKT3 patients experienced a lower number of rejection episodes (61 per 1455 P-M of risk exposure vs. 81/1320 in CsA patients, P less than 0.05). In addition, the frequency of corticoresistant rejection episodes was lower in OKT3 patients (9 out of 61 vs. 24 out of 81 in CsA patients, P less than 0.05). This resulted in a trend toward improved overall graft survival (83% vs. 75%, P = 0.12) and in a significant increase in immunological graft survival (92% vs. 79%, P = 0.02) in OKT3 patients at 3 years. Taken together, these data suggest that prophylactic OKT3 therapy might have long-term beneficial effects in cadaveric renal transplantation.     

Randomized double-blind study of immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab,a chimeric anti-interleukin-2 receptor monoclonal antibody,in combination with mycophenolate mofetil-containing triple therapy in renal transplantation

BACKGROUND: Acute rejection remains a major problem in renal transplantation. Immunoprophylaxis with basiliximab (Simulect) has achieved significant reductions in acute rejection episodes in renal allograft recipients receiving dual immunosuppression. This study explored the tolerability and cumulative benefit of combining basiliximab with triple-drug therapy-cyclosporine (USP Modified, Neoral), mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 123 kidney transplant recipients received either basiliximab at 20 mg before transplantation (day 0) and 20 mg on day 4 (n=59), or placebo (n=64). All received triple-drug immunosuppression and were followed for 6 months. RESULTS: Tolerability of basiliximab was equivalent to placebo, with no increase in serious adverse events, infection, malignancy, or posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder. At 6 months, there were trends in favor of basiliximab over placebo in the incidences of first biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (15.3% vs. 26.6%, P=NS) and of acute rejection treated with antibody (5.1% vs. 15.6%, P=NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates at 4 weeks and 6 months were significantly in favor of basiliximab treatment for first acute rejection, biopsy-confirmed rejection, rejection episodes treated with antibody therapy, and treatment failure. Renal function improved more rapidly in the basiliximab group, with mean creatinine clearance at week 2 being 54.7 mL/min versus 43.2 mL/min for placebo (P=0.034). At 12 months, patient survival was 100% in both groups; graft survival was 94.9% with basiliximab and 92.2% with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Basiliximab immunoprophylaxis is safe, well tolerated, and shows a trend toward reduction in number of acute rejection episodes in renal transplant patients receiving cyclosporine, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroids.