Changes in urinary NTX levels in patients with primary osteoporosis undergoing long-term bisphosphonate treatment

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates, antiresorptive drugs, are widely used to treat osteoporosis patients. However, recent reports indicated that several osteoporosis patients who underwent long-term bisphosphonate therapy subsequently developed severe suppression of bone turnover. We investigated whether urinary crosslinked N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTX), a bone resorption marker, in osteoporosis patients was highly suppressed during long-term treatment with alendronate or risedronate. METHODS: We investigated 87 primary osteoporosis outpatients who were treated with alendronate or risedronate for more than 2 years. All patients were women, with an average age of 72.6 years. Altogether, 49 patients were treated with alendronate and 38 with risedronate, and the average administration period was 3.5 years. We defined high suppression as NTX being reduced <9.3 nmol bone collagen equivalent/mmol.Cr and a 35% decrease from baseline. RESULTS: In total, 11 of 87 patients (12.6%) had high NTX suppression based on the above criteria. The incidences of high suppression of NTX at 1,2,3,and 4 years after starting the treatment were 0%, 1.1%, 11.9%, and 4.7%, respectively. The average age, bone mineral density, and NTX values at baseline and the administration period were not associated with high suppression of NTX during alendronate or risedronate treatment. Regarding suppression of NTX during long-term treatment, there was no significant difference between alendronate and risedronate. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggested that long-term treatment with bisphosphonates necessitates careful follow-up of the patients.     

Changes in bone resorption markers among Japanese patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis treated with alendronate and risedronate

We compared the abilities of alendronate and risedronate to reduce levels of urinary cross-1inked N-telopeptides of type I collagen (NTX) in Japanese postmenopausal women. The patients were randomly divided into two groups (alendronate, 5 mg/day, n = 61; risedronate, 2.5 mg/day, n = 60). All patients had taken all medication prescribed for the first month and at least 90% of that prescribed for each of the following 6 months. Urinary NTX was measured at baseline, as well as at 1 and 6 months after starting treatment. According to the guidelines of the Japan Osteoporosis Society, the minimum significant change (MSC) for urinary NTX is defined as a 35% decrease from baseline and the cutoff level for a high risk of future fracture is 54.3 nmol bone collagen equivalent (BCE)/mmol·Cr. The NTX reduction rates at 1 and 6 months were greater with alendronate than with risedronate, but the difference was not significant. The rate of patients with a reduction in the MSC at 1 month was greater with alendronate than with risedronate, but the difference did not reach significance. Alendronate reduced NTX at 1 month significantly more in patients with a high risk of fracture than risedronate, but the difference was no longer significant at 6 months. The rate of MSC did not significantly differ between the two groups. In conclusion, alendronate decreases bone resorption markers more obviously and rapidly than risedronate, especially in high risk for fracture, but not significantly according to the guidelines of the Japan Osteoporosis Society.     

Differences in persistence among different weekly oral bisphosphonate medications

Summary  We evaluated the differences in persistence with weekly oral bisphosphonate therapy according to the initial drug. Persistence to weekly oral preparations remains suboptimal, particularly in patients who receive generic alendronate. Alternative solutions are needed to improve the real life effectiveness of osteoporosis therapies. Introduction  Poor persistence is widespread with oral osteoporosis (OP) therapy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the persistence among OP patients started on weekly oral bisphosphonates (BP). Methods  Patients newly initiated on branded risedronate, branded alendronate, or generic alendronate once weekly were selected from the Régie de l’Assurance Maladie du Québec databases. The cohort included patients with and without a previous OP fracture. The probability and the risk factors for early discontinuation were estimated using Cox regression models. Results  The study cohort included 32,804 patients. After 1 year, a significant difference in persistence on oral BP therapy was found. The patients started on branded risedronate were 11% more likely to stop OP therapy than patients started on branded alendronate. Risk of discontinuation doubled in patients initiated with generic alendronate compared to patients started on branded alendronate. Male gender was associated with a 25% increase risk of early discontinuation. No statistical association was found between previous OP fracture and early discontinuation. Conclusion  This study provides further evidence of poor persistence to newly initiated oral weekly BP therapies, particularly for the patients started on generic alendronate.     

Application of a New Serum Assay for Type I Collagen Cross-Linked N-Telopeptides: Assessment of Diurnal Changes in Bone Turnover With and Without Alendronate Treatment

Biochemical markers of bone turnover are finding increased application in the investigation and management of skeletal diseases such as osteoporosis. The present study assessed for the first time the diurnal variation of serum type I collagen cross-linked N-telopeptides (NTx), a new serum-based marker of bone resorption, and the effect of antiresorptive therapy with alendronate on this marker in elderly osteopenic women. The concentrations of serum NTx were monitored over 24 hours in a randomly selected subset of 38 women (placebo n = 13, 69 ± 3 (SD) year; alendronate n = 25, 69 ± 3 year), who had completed 12–15 months of a larger (n = 120) randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial with alendronate 5 mg/day. Blood was obtained every 4 hours for measurement of serum NTx using a new chemiluminescent-based immunoassay. There was a significant diurnal variation of serum NTx (p = 0.001) in both the placebo and alendronate groups. Mean peak levels occurred at ∼0504 h with a mean nadir at ∼1320 h in the placebo group, with no significant difference on alendronate. Serum NTx was ∼25% lower in the alendronate group over the entire 24-hour period. Mean (SE) daytime (0800–2000) and nighttime (2200–0800) serum NTx values were 6.40 ± 0.30 versus 8.45 ± 0.58 nmol BCE/liter, and 7.42 ± 0.23 versus 10.01 ± 0.53 nmol BCE/liter for alendronate versus placebo, respectively (P≤ 0.003 for both comparisons). Combining the data of both treatment groups, serum NTx was significantly (P < 0.05) correlated with serum osteocalcin (r = 0.753) and urine NTx (r = 0.628) measurements previously obtained over the entire 24-hour period. Serum NTx has a significant diurnal variation and is responsive to antiresorptive therapy with alendronate. Alendronate reduces the amplitude but maintains the pattern of the 24-hour serum NTx profile. These data suggest that serum NTx may be a useful new marker of bone resorption. Received: 13 March 1997 / Accepted: 15 October 1997     

Treatment with once-weekly alendronate 70 mg compared with once-weekly risedronate 35 mg in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized double-blind study.

Once-weekly alendronate 70 mg and once-weekly risedronate 35 mg are indicated for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. These two agents were compared in a 12-month head-to-head trial. Greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover were seen with alendronate compared with risedronate with similar tolerability. INTRODUCTION: The nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates, alendronate and risedronate, are available in once-weekly (OW) formulations for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. A 12-month, head-to-head study was performed to compare these agents in the treatment of postmenopausal women with low BMD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 1053 patients from 78 U.S. sites were randomized to OW alendronate 70 mg (N = 520) or risedronate 35 mg (N = 533), taken in the morning after fasting. Endpoints included BMD changes over 6 and 12 months at the hip trochanter, total hip, femoral neck, and lumbar spine (LS); percent of patients with predefined levels of change in trochanter and LS BMD at 12 months; and change in biochemical markers of bone turnover at 3, 6, and 12 months. Tolerability was evaluated by adverse experience (AE) reporting. RESULTS: Significantly greater increases in hip trochanter BMD were seen with alendronate (3.4%) than risedronate (2.1%) at 12 months (treatment difference, 1.4%; p < 0.001) as well as 6 months (treatment difference, 1.3%; p < 0.001). Significantly greater gains in BMD were seen with alendronate at all BMD sites measured (12-month difference: total hip, 1.0%; femoral neck, 0.7%; LS, 1.2%). Significant differences were seen as early as 6 months at all sites. A greater percentage of patients had > or =0% (p < 0.001) and > or =3% (p < 0.01) gain in trochanter and spine BMD at 12 months with alendronate than risedronate. Significantly greater (p < 0.001) reductions in all biochemical markers of bone turnover occurred with alendronate compared with risedronate by 3 months. No significant differences were seen between treatment groups in the incidence of upper gastrointestinal AEs or AEs causing discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: In this 12-month, head-to-head trial of alendronate and risedronate, given in accordance with the approved OW regimens for treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women, alendronate produced greater gains in BMD and greater reductions in markers of bone turnover than risedronate. The greater antiresorptive effect of alendronate was seen as early as 3 months, and the tolerability profiles were similar.     

阿仑膦酸钠治疗男性骨质疏松症的临床研究

目的 观察阿仑膦酸钠治疗男性骨质疏松症的疗效和安全性。方法 ３７例男性骨质疏松症患者,选用阿仑膦酸钠治疗６个月。比较治疗前后患者疼痛、骨密度、血生化指标和副反应的变化。结果 经６个月治疗后,患者疼痛明显改善,腰椎、股骨颈和髋部骨密度增加,尿钙与尿肌酐比值（Ｃａ／Ｃｒ）及尿羟脯氨酸与尿肌酐比值（Ｈｏｐ／Ｃｒ）降低,副反应轻微且耐受性好。结论 阿仑膦酸钠治疗男性骨质疏松症疗效显著、安全性好。     

Effects of risedronate or alfacalcidol on bone mineral density,bone turnover,back pain,and fractures in Japanese men with primary osteoporosis: results of a two-year strict observational study

Although osteoporosis in men is already a major public health problem, there is still a dearth of data about the effects of risedronate in male osteoporosis, especially in Japanese with primary osteoporosis. Therefore, the objective of our study was to investigate the effects of risedronate on bone mineral density (BMD), bone turnover, back pain, and fractures in these patients prospectively for two years (at baseline, three months, six months, twelve months, and twenty-four months) both longitudinally and compared with those of alfacalcidol. The subjects enrolled for this study were 66 Japanese male patients with untreated primary osteoporosis (mean age 63.52 ± 8.7 years), who were divided into two groups (44 with risedronate and 22 with alfacalcidol). We measured BMD by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at three sites—the lumbar spine, femoral neck, and distal radius. Risedronate treatment significantly increased BMD at the lumbar spine and at the femoral neck, reduced bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BAP) and serum N-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), and reduced back pain, both longitudinally and compared with alfacalcidol treatment. We observed a lower rate of incident fracture in risedronate users. However, multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that this trend was not statistically significant, possibly because of the small number of patients enrolled. These potentially beneficial effects of risedronate on bone in male patients with primary osteoporosis suggest the possibility that osteoporosis should be treated with risedronate regardless of gender in order to effectively prevent subsequent osteoporotic fractures.     

The Efficacy and Tolerability of Alendronate in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Chinese Women: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Study

Osteoporosis is a growing health problem in Asian women and it is expected that half of the world's hip fractures will occur in Asia in 50 years' time. As the use of hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) is extremely low in postmenopausal Asian women, nonhormonal agents will be more acceptable for the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis. The efficacy, tolerability, and acceptability of alendronate, an amino-bisphosphonate, for Asian women was evaluated in 70 osteoporotic southern Chinese women in a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. The subjects were randomized to receive either alendronate 10 mg daily or placebo, plus calcium supplementation 500 mg daily. The baseline L 1–4 and hip bone mineral density (BMD) were similar between both groups. At the end of 1 year, there was an increase of 5.8% in the lumbar spine BMD and 3.4% at the total hip with alendronate treatment when compared with baseline values (P < 0.001). Alendronate treatment for 1 year resulted in significant improvement in BMD at all sites measured when compared with placebo. There was also marked reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and urinary n-telopeptide (NTx) in the alendronate group when compared with the placebo group (ALP 25% versus 2%, NTx 75% versus 14%, both P < 0.005). The changes in ALP and NTx at 6 and 12 months correlated with the change in BMD at all sites measured at 1 year (P all <0.05). Alendronate was well tolerated and accepted, although two cases of gastric ulcer were reported. We conclude that alendronate is an effective and well-accepted agent for the treatment of osteoporosis in Asian women. Received: 30 September 1999 / Accepted 6 April 2000     

Vertebral fracture risk and alendronate effects on osteoporosis assessed by a computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method

Computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method (CT/FEM) can accurately predict vertebral compressive strength ex vivo and this method is clinically available in vivo. This study aimed to assess vertebral fracture risk and alendronate effects on osteoporosis in vivo using CT/FEM. Vertebral strength in 123 postmenopausal women was analyzed and the discriminatory power for vertebral fracture was assessed cross-sectionally. Alendronate effects were also prospectively assessed in 33 patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis who were treated with alendronate at a dose of 5 mg/day for 18 months. CT/FEM had higher discriminatory power for vertebral fracture than areal bone mineral density (BMD) and volumetric BMD and detected alendronate effects at 3 months. Marked bone density increases were noted in juxtacortical areas compared to inner trabecular areas. CT/FEM was useful for assessing vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects on osteoporosis.     

Prevention of Corticosteroid-Induced Osteoporosis with Alendronate in Sarcoid Patients

Prolonged corticosteroid administration, as often required in the treatment of sarcoidosis, increases the risk of osteoporosis and fracture. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of alendronate, a third generation bisphosphonate, in preventing corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. Forty-three consecutive, previously untreated, sarcoid patients (17 men and 26 premenopausal women) were included in the study: 13 needed no treatment and served as controls (Group 1) and 30 needed glucocorticoids (prednisone) and were randomly selected to also receive either placebo (n = 15, Group 2) or alendronate 5 mg/day (n = 15, Group 3). Bone mineral density (BMD) at the ultradistal radius by dual photon absorptiometry (Osteograph 1000, NIM, Verona, Italy) and biochemical markers of bone turnover were measured at baseline and after 6 and 12 months of glucocorticoid therapy. No significant difference was found between Groups 2 and 3 in the mean cumulative dose of prednisone (4945 ± 1956 mg and 5110 ± 2013 mg, respectively). At the end of the study period, BMD increased by 0.8% in the alendronate-treated group; in the placebo-treated group, BMD decreased by 4.5%. The difference between groups was significant (P < 0.01, ANOVA). A significant decrease in markers of bone formation was found in all patients treated with prednisone (Groups 2 and 3), independently of alendronate. Alendronate, however, counteracted the increase in markers of bone resorption induced by glucocorticoid therapy. Our data suggest that alendronate is effective in preventing glucocorticoid-induced bone loss in sarcoid patients. Further studies on alendronate use in steroid-induced osteoporosis are needed. Received: 30 September 1996 / Accepted: 30 April 1997     

胰岛素、阿仑膦酸钠治疗新诊断老年糖尿病骨质疏松症患者骨密度及骨转换指标的研究

目的通过观察胰岛素、阿仑膦酸钠干预,观察在糖尿病骨质疏松症治疗12个月后股骨颈(Femur Neck)骨密度(BMD)及骨特异性碱性磷酸酶(BAP)、骨钙素(BGP)、抗酒石酸酸性磷酸酶-5b(TRAP-5b)等血清骨转换指标的变化。方法选取在我院治疗的糖尿病骨质疏松症患者128例,随机分成4组,即对照组(METF)、胰岛素组(INSU)、二甲双胍+阿仑膦酸钠组(METF+ALEN)、胰岛素+阿仑膦酸钠组(INSU+ALEN),每组同时服用钙尔奇D片作为基础用药,分别于服药前及服药12月后,测定4组患者股骨颈BMD及血BAP、BGP、TRAP-5b,分析治疗前后以及治疗组与对照组间的差异。结果 INSU+ALEN组治疗12月可见患者骨密度较前增加,治疗前后有统计学意义(P0.05),METF、INSU组较前无明显改变,治疗前后无统计学意义(P0.05),METF+ALEN组治疗12月可见患者BMD较前略有增加,治疗前后无统计学意义(P0.05),INSU+ALEN组治疗后BMD的增加明显高于其它组(P均0.05)。INSU+ALEN治疗组患者治疗12月后血清BAP、BGP显著升高(P0.05),TRAP-5b显著降低(P0.05);将上述指标与对照组、其它治疗组比较,BAP、BGP、TRAP-5b差异显著(P均0.01);METF、INSU、METF+ALEN组治疗12月可见患者血清BAP、BGP较前略有增加,TRAP-5b略有降低,治疗前后无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论胰岛素是糖尿病骨质疏松症首选治疗,可增加骨量,预防骨丢失。阿仑膦酸钠能抑制骨吸收,促进骨形成,减缓骨量丢失,提高骨密度,二者联用可有效防治糖尿病骨质疏松症。     

Actions of osteoporosis treatments on bone histomorphometric remodeling: a two-fold principal component analysis

Summary

This was the first study to apply principal component analysis method to bone histomorphometric parameters. The results corroborated teriparatide’s distinct, yet different, mechanisms of action, which stimulate both bone formation and resorption.

Introduction

This study consolidated bone histomorphometric parameters and compared the effects of two osteoporosis treatments on bone remodeling by using a principal component analysis (PCA).

Methods

Included in this analysis were postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who were treated with either teriparatide or alendronate and who completed transiliac bone biopsy at either 6 or 18 months in the randomized, double-blind Forteo Alendronate Comparator Trial. Eighteen histomorphometric parameters were grouped into formation and resorption categories. The first principal component of each category was estimated through the PCA. The summation of principal formation component (PFC) and principal resorption component (PRC) was calculated to represent the overall level of bone turnover. The difference between PFC and PRC was computed to determine the balance between formation and resorption.

Results

The PFC was significantly higher in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group (P?<?0.0001), while the PRC was numerically lower in the alendronate group (P?=?0.18). The mean difference between the PFC and PRC was positive in the teriparatide group and negative in the alendronate group.

Conclusions

Our approach of consolidating bone histomorphometric remodeling parameters corroborated the idea that the distinct, yet different, mechanisms of action of teriparatide treatment stimulate both bone formation and resorption, and alendronate treatment suppresses both bone formation and resorption.     

The Effect of Alendronate,Risedronate, and Raloxifene on Renal Functions,Based on the Cockcroft and Gault Method,in Postmenopausal Women

Background. Oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are effective treatment options in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is little previously reported about the renal safety profiles of these three agents in osteoporosis. We aimed to assess the risk of renal toxicity associated with oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis, prospectively. Methods. One hundred and twenty-seven patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia according to lumbar or femoral-neck bone mineral density t score were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to alendronate 70 mg once weekly (n = 47), risedronate 35 mg once weekly (n = 44), or raloxifene 60 mg per day (n = 36) for one year. Preliminary screening included medical history, physical examination, lumbar and femoral bone mineral densitometry measurement, and blood biochemical tests, including renal function tests. The biochemical markers were then assessed at the end of 12 months. Results. There was no significant difference between basal and final renal function parameters of each group. Also these parameters did not differ between the three groups after 12 months of treatment period. Conclusions. These results demonstrate that alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are all safe drugs for renal functions in the treatment of osteoporosis.     

Differential effects of teriparatide and alendronate on bone remodeling in postmenopausal women assessed by histomorphometric parameters.

An 18-month randomized double-blind study was conducted in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 microg with alendronate 10 mg on bone histomorphometry. Biopsies were obtained from 42 patients. Indices of bone formation were significantly higher after 6 or 18 months of teriparatide compared with alendronate treatment. INTRODUCTION: Alendronate and teriparatide increased BMD, assessed by DXA, by different mechanisms of action, supported by changes in biochemical markers of bone turnover. The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to explore the differential effects of these two osteoporosis treatments at the bone tissue level by examining bone histomorphometric parameters of bone turnover after either 6 or 18 months of treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients were a cohort from a randomized parallel double-blind study conducted to compare the effects of once-daily teriparatide 20 microg and alendronate 10 mg in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Transiliac crest bone biopsies were obtained after tetracycline double labeling from 42 patients treated for 6 months (n = 23) or 18 months (n = 14); 5 additional patients were biopsied from contralateral sides at 6 and 18 months. Biopsy specimens adequate for quantitative analysis were analyzed by 2D histomorphometry from 17 patients at 6 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 9) and 15 patients at 18 months (teriparatide, n = 8; alendronate, n = 7). Data were analyzed by two-sample tests. RESULTS: Histomorphometric indices of bone formation were significantly and markedly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 and 18 months, whereas indices of bone resorption were only significantly greater in the teriparatide group than in the alendronate group at 6 months. Bone formation and activation frequency were significantly lower at 18 months compared with 6 months in the teriparatide group, returning to levels comparable with untreated postmenopausal women. In the teriparatide group, the peak in histomorphometric bone formation indices coincided with peak levels for N-terminal propeptide of type I collagen, a biochemical marker of bone formation. The degree of mineralization was lower at 18 months than at 6 months with treatment in both groups but was not different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: These results confirm the opposite mechanisms of action of teriparatide and alendronate on bone remodeling and confirm the bone formation effect of teriparatide.     

Risedronate reduces postoperative bone resorption after cementless total hip arthroplasty

Summary Forty-three patients who had undergone cementless THA were randomly assigned to receive no osteoactive drug or oral risedronate for 6 months. Postoperative decrease of BMD in the risedronate group was significantly lower than that seen in the control group in zones 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7. Introduction Proximal bone resorption around the femoral stem often has been observed after total hip arthroplasty (THA), could lead to late stem loosening. We previously reported the efficacy of etidronate on periprosthetic bone resorption after cementless THA. Recently risedronate is suggested to be effective for the prevention and treatment of for osteoporosis. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the effects of risedronate on periprosthetic bone loss after cementless THA. Methods Forty-three patients who had undergone cementless THA were randomly assigned to receive no osteoactive drug (21 patients) or oral risedronate 2.5 mg/day (22 patients) for 6 months. Three patients were eliminated from the risedronate group because of dyspepsia. Periprosthetic bone mineral density (BMD) in seven regions of interest based on the zones of Gruen et al. was measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry at 3 weeks and 6 months postoperatively. Results At 6 months after surgery, postoperative decrease of BMD in the risedronate group was significantly lower than that seen in the control group in zones 1, 2, 3, 6, and 7 (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.01, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). Conclusion These outcomes suggested that risedronate might reduce the periprosthetic bone resorption after cementless THA.     

Clinical efficacy of bisphosphonates and monoclonal antibodies on bone mineral density following skeletal fractures

BackgroundBisphosphonates and monoclonal antibodies are drugs primarily developed to inhibit osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and are used to treat an array of skeletal pathologies. Their use is aimed at increasing bone health and therefore reducing fracture risks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bone protection therapy on improving bone mineral density (BMD) in patients following a fracture.MethodsInclusion criteria consisted of patients who sustained a skeletal fracture and were subsequently commenced on bone protection therapy. Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scans were performed at baseline and following a consented period of drug therapy. Bone health data included T-Scores, Z-Scores, FRAX Major, FRAX Hip and BMD. The clinical effectiveness of four bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, pamidronate and zoledronate) and one monoclonal antibody (denosumab) were evaluated.ResultsA total of 100 patients were included in the study. Overall, bone protection therapy significantly improved Z-score Hip, Z-score Spine, T-score Spine and BMD Spine (p < 0.05). There was a marked difference between drug therapies. Denosumab and zoledronate were associated with the greatest treatment effect size. Alendronate only improved Z-score Spine and Z-score Hip (p < 0.05). Pamidronate and risedronate did not demonstrate any statistically significant improvement across any DEXA parameter.ConclusionOverall, bisphosphonates/monoclonal antibodies confer beneficial effects on bone health as measured by DEXA scans in patients following skeletal fractures. However, the magnitude of improvement varies among the commonly used drugs. Alendronate, zoledronate and denosumab were associated with greatest therapeutic benefit. Bone protection therapy did not improve fracture risk of patients (FRAX scores).     

The effect of alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene on renal functions, based on the Cockcroft and Gault method, in postmenopausal women

BACKGROUND: Oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are effective treatment options in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. There is little previously reported about the renal safety profiles of these three agents in osteoporosis. We aimed to assess the risk of renal toxicity associated with oral alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene in the treatment of osteoporosis, prospectively. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients with osteoporosis and osteopenia according to lumbar or femoral-neck bone mineral density t score were enrolled in the study. The patients were randomized to alendronate 70 mg once weekly (n = 47), risedronate 35 mg once weekly (n = 44), or raloxifene 60 mg per day (n = 36) for one year. Preliminary screening included medical history, physical examination, lumbar and femoral bone mineral densitometry measurement, and blood biochemical tests, including renal function tests. The biochemical markers were then assessed at the end of 12 months. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between basal and final renal function parameters of each group. Also these parameters did not differ between the three groups after 12 months of treatment period. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene are all safe drugs for renal functions in the treatment of osteoporosis.