Multicenter randomized phase II study of two schedules of docetaxel, estramustine, and prednisone versus mitoxantrone plus prednisone in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Mitoxantrone-corticosteroid is currently the standard palliative treatment in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) patients. Recent clinical trials documented the high activity of the docetaxel-estramustine combination. We conducted a randomized phase II study to evaluate prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (primary end point) and safety of two docetaxel-estramustine-prednisone (DEP) regimens and mitoxantrone-prednisone (MP). PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred thirty metastatic HRPC patients were randomly assigned to receive docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2 or 35 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of each 21-day cycle) and estramustine (280 mg p.o. tid on days 1 through 5 and 8 through 12) or mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks; all patients received prednisone (10 mg daily). RESULTS: One hundred twenty-seven patients were assessable for PSA response and safety. A > or = 50% PSA decline was found in a greater percentage of patients in the docetaxel arms (67% and 63%) compared with MP (18%; P = .0001). Median time to PSA progression was five times longer with DEP than with MP (8.8 and 9.3 v 1.7 months, respectively; P = .000001). Overall survival was better in the docetaxel arms (18.6 and 18.4 months) compared with the MP arm (13.4 months), but not significantly so (P = .3). Crossover rates differed significantly among treatment arms (16%, 10%, and 48% in arms A, B, and C, respectively; P = .00001). Treatment-related toxicities were mild and mainly hematologic. CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized phase II study showed significantly higher PSA decline < or = 50% and longer times to progression in HRPC patients receiving DEP-based chemotherapy than MP, and that DEP could be proposed in this setting.     

Characterization of prognostic factors and efficacy in a phase-II study with docetaxel and estramustine for advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel based chemotherapy not only reduces pain and improves quality of life in advanced hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC), but it also improves survival. We investigated the combination of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with HRPC regarding efficacy and prognostic parameters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a phase-II trial, administering docetaxel (70 mg/m(2) i.v., day 2, every 3 weeks) and estramustine (280 mg 3 times daily p.o., 1 day prior to docetaxel, on 5 consecutive days) to patients with HRPC. Patients were monitored for PSA (prostate-specific antigen) response and toxicity. RESULTS: 62 patients were treated. The median age was 67.5 years, the median PSA was 177.9 ng/ml. The median number of cycles was 6. The median time to progression (TTP) and median survival time were 14 (+/-2) and 24 (+/-5) months, respectively. A = 50% decrease in PSA levels from baseline occurred in 38 (61.3%) patients of whom 25 (40.3%) had a = 75% PSA decrease. The main grade 3-4 hematologic toxicities were neutropenia 34% and anemia 18%. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of docetaxel and estramustine exerts substantial activity in HRPC suggesting an overall survival benefit with manageable toxicity. This trial also demonstrated a survival advantage for patients with early chemotherapeutic intervention. We identified PSA relapse, baseline PSA and hemoglobin as valuable prognostic factors in this setting.     

Survival and PSA response of patients in the TAX 327 study who crossed over to receive docetaxel after mitoxantrone or vice versa

BackgroundThe TAX 327 study compared 3-weekly docetaxel, weekly docetaxel or 3-weekly mitoxantrone, each with prednisone, for 1006 patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Survival and symptom control were superior following 3-weekly docetaxel as compared with mitoxantrone. At progression, many patients were treated with the other drug. Here, we provide a retrospective report of survival and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after second-line therapy.MethodsThe TAX 327 database provided information about treatment after progression on first-line therapy, and survival has been updated. Investigators were asked to provide information about crossover treatment and serial PSA values.ResultsWe identified 232 crossover patients. Median survival after crossover was 10 months and did not depend on direction of crossover. Data on PSA response are available for 96 patients: PSA response (≥50% reduction) occurred in 15% of 71 men receiving mitoxantrone after docetaxel and in 28% of 25 men receiving docetaxel after mitoxantrone. Median PSA progression-free survival was 3.4 months for mitoxantrone after docetaxel and 5.9 months for docetaxel after mitoxantrone.ConclusionsOne quarter of men received crossover therapy and survival was similar in the crossover groups. The PSA response rate to docetaxel after mitoxantrone was higher than that for mitoxantrone after docetaxel.     

Sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine in patients with hormone refractory metastatic prostate cancer: results of a phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Mitoxantrone/prednisone ameliorates symptoms in hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) but has no effect on survival. Docetaxel (Taxotere)/estramustine improves response but with significant toxicity. We reasoned that a sequential administration of the two regimens could be a viable alternative for delivering full doses of chemotherapy, avoiding overlapping toxicity and preserving dose intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty HRPC patients were treated with mitoxantrone 10 mg/m(2), day 1, every 3 weeks, plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily, for three cycles, followed by estramustine phosphate, 280 mg three times daily, days 1 to 5, plus docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 2, every 3 weeks for a maximum of 10 cycles. RESULTS: All patients were assessable for response and toxicity. After mitoxantrone/prednisone treatment, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate was 23%, which increased to 63% after completion of sequential mitoxantrone/prednisone and docetaxel/estramustine treatment (12 partial and 7 complete responses). With a median follow-up of 18 months, median survival for all patients was 18 months, and median progression-free survival was 10 months. The mitoxantrone/prednisone regimen was well tolerated, and the only grade 3-4 toxicity was grade 3 neutropenia in four (13%) patients. Twenty-nine patients received a total of 173 cycles of docetaxel/estramustine (median, 6 cycles/patient). Six (20%) patients had grade 3-4 neutropenia and two (6%) patients had febrile neutropenia episodes. The most frequent non-hematological toxic effects were asthenia, nausea and vomiting, edemas and onycholysis. Two (6%) patients had deep venous thrombosis. CONCLUSIONS: Mitoxantrone/prednisone followed by docetaxel/estramustine is a well-tolerated and active regimen in HRPC. Sequential therapy is feasible and can be used to integrate novel, more active regimens.     

Long-term outcome of a phase II study of weekly docetaxel with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine in hormone-resistant prostate cancer patients

Objective The objective was to define the toxicity and activity of weekly docetaxel administered with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine in patients with hormone-resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). Patients and methods Twenty-four patients were treated with the next regimen: weekly docetaxel 36 mg/m² iv for three consecutive weeks every 28 days, and estramustine 280 mg three times a day for three consecutive days beginning the day before docetaxel (days 1–3, 8–10 and 15–17). In order to prevent thromboembolic events, 40 mg of subcutaneous enoxaparine was administered daily sc on the same days as estramustine. Primary endpoints were: toxicity, especially the presence of thromboembolic events, PSA response rate and response in measurable disease. Secondary endpoints were: time to PSA progression and overall survival. Results Nineteen of 24 patients (79.1%, 95% CI 71–87%) had a PSA response ≥50%. Four of the eleven patients with measurable disease had a partial response. The median time to PSA progression was 7 months (CI 95%: 6.5–9) and the median survival was 19 months (IC 95%: 11–24). Toxicity was manageable with no treatment-related mortality. Only two patients had grade 4 neutropenia. Two patients had thrombotic events, one deep venous thrombosis and one stroke. The main grade 3 non-haematologic toxicity was diarrhoea and asthenia, both in 25% of patients. Conclusions Weekly docetaxel with a short course of estramustine and enoxaparine is active and tolerable in HRPC patients. The observed incidence of thrombosis was lower than previously reported but the association of enoxaparine was not enough to completely prevent the thromboembolic events.     

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel plus estramustine and single-agent docetaxel in patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Docetaxel (Taxotere)-based regimens are the new standard therapy in advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A synergistic activity has been shown with docetaxel in combination with estramustine in vitro; however, the benefit of this combination remains controversial in clinical practice. We assessed the activity and safety of docetaxel alone and docetaxel-estramustine in HRPC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 92) with metastatic HRPC and rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) while receiving androgen suppression were randomized to 3-weekly treatment with either docetaxel 75 mg/m(2), day 1 (D), or docetaxel 70 mg/m(2), day 2, plus oral estramustine 280 mg twice daily, days 1-5 (DE). RESULTS: Ninety-one patients were treated (DE 47, D 44). A PSA response occurred in 68% (primary endpoint met) and 30% of patients, respectively. Median PSA response duration was 6.0 months in both groups. Median time to progression was 5.7 and 2.9 months, and median survival was 19.3 and 17.8 months in the DE and D arms, respectively. Hematologic and non-hematologic toxic effects were mild and similar in both arms. One patient in each group withdrew due to toxicity. Quality of life was similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Combining estramustine with docetaxel in this schedule is an active and well-tolerated treatment option in HRPC.     

Docetaxel and prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is currently the most-frequency malignancy in men, and the second cause of death from cancer in the Western world. Once the disease has metastasized, palliative treatment is the rule. First-sine therapy consists in surgical or chemical castration, associated or not with anti-androgens. This treatment approach is active in 80% cases but failures occur within 12-18 months. When the disease becomes refractory to hormone therapy, few alternatives are available. The combination of mitoxantrone-steroids improves clinical symptoms, namely by reducing pain, but does not improve patient survival. Both docetaxel and estramustine act through microtubules and synergistic interactions have been shown between these two compounds. Recently, several studies have demonstrated the efficacy of a combination of estramustine and taxanes, and in particular docetaxel. Phase II trials using docetaxel monotherapy have demonstrated responses rates concerning PSA of 45 to 58% and objective response of 33% and 40%. Combination with estramustine increases the biochemical response rate from 45% and 74%. A randomized phase II trial revealed the superiority of this combination compared to mitoxantrone in terms of response rate and clinical benefit. The results of phase III trials are still not available, in particular as concerns survival, but the combination docetaxel-estramustine appears very promising, even though the ideal therapeutic protocol is still under evaluation.     

Weekly administration of docetaxel in combination with estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer: final results from a phase II study

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of weekly docetaxel, estramustine and celecoxib in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Forty-eight patients received 35 mg m(-2) of weekly docetaxel for 3 out of every 4 weeks, 280 mg of estramustine twice daily on days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 and 400 mg of celecoxib twice daily until progression or toxicity. Cycles were repeated every 28 days for at least six cycles. Patients were evaluated for response and toxicity. Patients received a median of four cycles (range: 1-9). On an intention-to-treat analysis, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was decreased greater than 50% in 28 out of 48 patients (overall response rate: 58%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 44-72) and median duration of PSA response was 8.0 months (95% CI: 6.9-9.0). After a median follow-up of 11.3 months, the median time to progression was 7.1 months and the median overall survival was 19.2 months. The most frequent severe toxicity was asthenia (15% of patients), diarrhoea and stomatitis (8% of patients, each). Grade 3/4 neutropenia was reported in two patients. There was a toxic death during the study due to a gastric perforation. Celecoxib with weekly docetaxel and estramustine is an effective and safe treatment for patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer, but it does not seem to add any benefit to docetaxel.     

Achieving treatment goals for hormone-refractory prostate cancer with chemotherapy

The belief that hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) is a chemotherapy-resistant disease has been effectively refuted by the results of two recent randomized phase III trials. The TAX327 trial compared weekly docetaxel, every-3-weeks (Q3W) docetaxel, and Q3W mitoxantrone plus prednisone in 1,006 patients with HRPC, and results demonstrated that survival was significantly longer with a docetaxel-based regimen than with mitoxantrone. That trial demonstrated that only Q3W docetaxel was significantly superior to mitoxantrone with respect to overall survival. Quality of life was also superior in the docetaxel groups. In the Southwest Oncology Group (SWOG) 9916 trial, 674 men with progressive HRPC were randomized to 3-week cycles of docetaxel plus estramustine or mitoxantrone plus prednisone. Overall and disease-free survival times were significantly longer in the docetaxel arm. Collectively, the results of these trials demonstrate that survival can be significantly improved with chemotherapy in patients with HRPC to an extent that is comparable with the survival benefits seen in other cancers considered sensitive to chemotherapy such as breast cancer. Among various research tasks in HRPC is the definition of potential surrogate end points for survival, which will facilitate the conduct of pivotal trials. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate and changes in PSA constructs (i.e., PSA doubling time and PSA velocity) are promising potential surrogate end points for future trials and are being actively evaluated at the present time. Until there is clear demonstration of a surrogate role for these alternative end points, survival remains the appropriate end point for phase III trials in HRPC. There is a need for safe and effective second- and third-line regimens for patients progressing after docetaxel, and these patients should enter clinical trials designed for this population. Mitoxantrone, vinorelbine, the platinum analogue satraplatin, and epothilone are among compounds that require careful testing in this setting. The addition of targeted therapies, such as the endothelin receptor antagonist, atrasentan, and angiogenesis inhibitors, such as thalidomide and bevacizumab, to docetaxel-based therapy is being evaluated. High-dose calcitriol may also be an effective addition to docetaxel. The extensive effort devoted to the evaluation of chemotherapy and other systemic modalities of treatment of HRPC is likely to yield additional clinical benefit for patients, making HRPC a more manageable, less lethal, and less debilitating disease.     

Recent progress in management of advanced prostate cancer

Androgen-deprivation therapy, usually with combined androgen blockade, is standard initial treatment for advanced prostate cancer. With failure of initial treatment, as indicated by rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, second-line hormonal therapy is usually instituted. Over the past several years, it has become increasingly clear that systemic chemotherapy has an important role in hormone-refractory disease. Phase II trials have demonstrated high PSA and measurable disease response rates with taxane single-agent and combination treatments. One recent phase III trial showed that docetaxel (Taxotere)/ estramustine (Emcyt) significantly improved overall survival, progression-free survival, and PSA response rate compared with mitoxantrone (Novantrone) plus prednisone. Another phase III trial demonstrated that docetaxel given every 3 weeks plus prednisone significantly improved overall survival, PSA response rate, pain relief response rate, and quality of life compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone. On the basis of these findings, every-3-week docetaxel plus prednisone is now considered standard first-line therapy for metastatic hormone-refractory disease. There is considerable optimism that treatment can be further improved. Studies of taxane combinations with bevacizumab (Avastin), thalidomide (Thalomid), bortezomib (Velcade), antisense Bcl-2 oligonucleotide, mTOR inhibitors, epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, and KDR inhibitors are under way. Randomized phase III trials in progress or planned are examining docetaxel in combination with imatinib mesylate (Gleevec) or calcitriol and docetaxel/prednisone in combination with bevacizumab and an antisense clusterin compound. Other promising systemic agents include epothilones and atrasentan, and promising vaccines include Provenge, GVAX, and Prostvac.     

Phase II study of sequential chemotherapy with docetaxel-estramustine followed by mitoxantrone-prednisone in patients with advanced hormone-refractory prostate cancer

Sequential chemotherapy may improve treatment efficacy avoiding the additive toxicity associated with concomitant polichemotherapy in hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Forty patients received docetaxel 30 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), weekly, plus estramustine 280 mg twice daily for 12 weeks. After 2 weeks rest, patients with a decline or stable PSA were treated with mitoxantrone 12 mg m(-2) i.v. every 3 weeks plus prednisone 5 mg twice daily for 12 cycles. Forty patients were assessable for toxicity after docetaxel/estramustine. Main toxicities were grade 3-4 AST/ALT or bilirubin increase in seven patients (17.5%) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in four patients (10%). Twenty-seven patients received mitoxantrone/prednisone. Main toxicities included DVT in one patient (3.7%) and congestive heart failure in two patients (7%). Thirty-nine patients were assessable for PSA response. Twenty-nine patients (72.5%; 95% CI 63-82%) obtained a >/=50% PSA decline with 15 patients (37.5%; 95% CI 20-50%) that demonstrated a >/=90% decrease. Median progression-free and overall survival were respectively 7.0 (95% CI 5.8-8.2 months) and 19.2 months (95% CI 13.9-24.3 months). In conclusion, although this regimen demonstrated a favourable toxicity profile, sequential administration of mitoxantrone is not able to improve docetaxel activity in patients with HRPC.     

A phase 2 study of estramustine,docetaxel, and bevacizumab in men with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND:

The use of docetaxel prolongs survival for patients with castrate‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Inhibition of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with bevacizumab may further enhance the antitumor effect of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with CRPC.

METHODS:

This cooperative group trial enrolled men with CRPC. Patients received oral estramustine 280 mg 3 times daily on Days 1 through 5 of every cycle plus 70 mg/m² docetaxel and 15 mg/kg bevacizumab on Day 2 every 3 weeks. Prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) values were monitored every cycle, and imaging studies were obtained every 3 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), and the secondary objectives were safety, PSA decline, measurable disease response, and overall survival.

RESULTS:

Seventy‐nine patients were enrolled; and 77 patients received a median of 8 cycles and were evaluable. A 50% PSA decline was observed in 58 patients (75%). Twenty‐three of 39 patients with measurable disease had a partial response (59%). The median PFS was 8 months, and the overall median survival was 24 months. Neutropenia without fever (69%), fatigue (25%), and thrombosis/emboli (9%) were the most common severe toxicities. Twenty‐four of 77 patients were removed from protocol treatment because of disease progression, 35 of 77 patients were removed because of a physician or patient decision, and 15 patients were removed secondary to toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS:

The combination of docetaxel, estramustine, and bevacizumab was tolerable but complicated by toxicity. Although the endpoint of PFS did not meet the desired level, encouraging antitumor activity and overall survival were observed. Further phase 3 evaluation of the role of bevacizumab in CRPC is ongoing. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.     

A phase I study of estramustine, weekly docetaxel, and carboplatin chemotherapy in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To define the maximal tolerated dose, safety, and efficacy of docetaxel, carboplatin, and estramustine in patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). METHODS: Patients with HRPC received docetaxel for 3 weeks, followed by a rest week. Docetaxel (20, 25, 30, 36, or 43 mg/m2) was given on days 2, 9, and 16 of a 28-day cycle. Patients also received estramustine (140 mg p.o. three times daily on days 1-5, 8-12, and 15-19) and carboplatin [area under the curve, AUC (5) or (6) on day 2]. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated. Five patients received carboplatin [AUC (6)] but experienced delayed thrombocytopenia. After a protocol amendment, 25 subsequent patients received carboplatin [AUC (5)]. Median age was 64 years. Median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 117 ng/mL. Fifty-three percent received prior ketoconazole and 10% had mitoxantrone. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. Although maximal tolerated dose was not reached, docetaxel dose escalation was stopped at 43 mg/m2. Significant myelosuppression was not seen until the highest dose level, when seven and four patients experienced grade 3 and 4 toxicities, respectively. Among all patients, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 63%. At the recommended phase II dose, PSA declines of > or =50% occurred in 75% (95% confidence interval, 43-95). Four of 14 (29%) patients with measurable disease had partial responses. Median survival was 14.6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Estramustine, docetaxel, and carboplatin are well tolerated and active in HRPC. Myelosuppression is the primary toxicity. The recommended phase II dose of docetaxel is 43 mg/m2 combined with estramustine and carboplatin. PSA declines were seen at every dose level.     

A multicenter phase III trial comparing irinotecan-gemcitabine (IG) with gemcitabine (G) monotherapy as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer

Our purpose was to determine the response rate and median and overall survival of gemcitabine as monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma who were chemotherapy and radiotherapy naive were enrolled. Patients were centrally randomised at a one-to-one ratio to receive either gemcitabine monotherapy (900 mg m(-2) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks (arm G), or gemcitabine (days 1 and 8) plus irinotecan (300 mg m(-2) on day 8) (arm IG), repeated every 3 weeks. The total number of cycles administered was 255 in the IG arm and 245 in the G arm; the median number of cycles was 3. In all, 145 patients (71 in arm IG and 74 in arm G) were enrolled; 60 and 70 patients from arms IG and G, respectively, were evaluable. A complete clinical response was achieved in three (4.3%) arm G patients; nine (15%) patients in arm IG and four (5.7%) in arm G achieved a partial response. The overall response rate was: arm IG 15% and arm G 10% (95% CI 5.96-24.04 and 95% CI 2.97-17.03, respectively; P=0.387). The median time to tumour progression was 2.8 months and 2.9 months and median survival time was 6.4 and 6.5 months for the IG and G arms, respectively. One-year survival was 24.3% for the IG arm and 21.8% for the G arm. No statistically significant difference was observed comparing gemcitabine monotherapy versus gemcitabine plus irinotecan in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer, with respect to overall and 1-year survival.     

Comparison of docetaxel and docetaxel-irinotecan combination as second-line chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a randomized phase II trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether docetaxel (taxotere) treatment with or without irinotecan improved patient outcomes with similar toxicity in recurrent non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent platinum-refractory NSCLC with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were randomized to either docetaxel 30 mg/m(2) and irinotecan 60 mg/m(2) (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) (day 1), both administered every 3 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 130 patients were randomized. The response rate (RR) (20% versus 14%), overall survival (6.5 months versus 6.4 months) and 1-year survival (37% versus 34%) were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms, respectively. The combination arm demonstrated a longer time to tumor progression (TTP) (5.6 versus 4.8 months; P=0.065). Grade 3-4 neutropenia and anemia were similar in the combination and docetaxel arms. Grades 3-4 non-hematological toxicity (except diarrhea) was mild and was similar in the two groups. Grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (17% versus 6%; P=0.04) and diarrhea (12% versus 3%; P=0.05) occurred more frequently in the combination arm. CONCLUSIONS: The administration of irinotecan with docetaxel in platinum-refractory NSCLC prolonged TTP, but did not improve significantly RR, median survival or 1-year survival. Second-line docetaxel monotherapy offers significant and reproducible efficacy in platinum-refractory NSCLC.     

Hormonoresistant metastatic prostate cancer: analysis of two phase III clinical studies

Until now, mitoxantrone was the standard drug for hormone resistant prostate cancer (HRPC). Docetaxel has shown more than 50% of biological response rate in HRPC in several phase II studies. Recently, two phase III studies comparing mitoxantrone and docetaxel were reported. In the view of the results of these studies, it is likely that we will change the usual treatment policy. First one , TAX 327, compared docetaxel 75 mg/m2 every 3 weeks, docetaxel 35 mg/m2 weekly and mitoxantrone 12 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. 1,006 patients were included, overall survival was better in the docetaxel arm than in the mitoxantrone arm (18.7 vs. 16.9 months; p = 0.009). The SWOG study compared docetaxel-estramustine and mitoxantrone-prednisone. 770 patients were included, the difference in overall survival was significantly in favor of the docetaxel arm (17.5 vs. 15.6 months; p = 0.02). These results shows that docetaxel is now the standard treatment of HRPC and the standard arm for future studies in this disease.     

Association of rash with outcomes in a randomized phase II trial evaluating cetuximab in combination with mitoxantrone plus prednisone after docetaxel for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Purpose

Cetuximab (C), a chimeric monoclonal antibody that binds epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), is active against androgen-independent prostate cancer cell lines and might enhance the activity of chemotherapy. The efficacy of combining cetuximab with mitoxantrone (M) plus prednisone (MP) was evaluated in progressive metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) after receiving docetaxel.

Materials and Methods

Patients with progression after receiving docetaxel were eligible and randomized 2:1 to CMP or MP. Therapy was mitoxantrone 12 mg/m² intravenously (I.V.) on day 1, oral prednisone 10 mg daily in both arms, and cetuximab 250 mg/m² I.V. (400 mg/m² day 1, cycle 1) on days 1, 8, and 15 in the CMP arm. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. Radiologic assessments of disease and PSA (prostate-specific antigen) occurred every 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was time to progression (TTP).

Results

A total of 115 patients were enrolled, 75 in the CMP and 40 in the MP arm: the median TTP was 4.9 and 6.6 months, respectively; the measurable disease response rate was 2% and 4%, the PSA response rate 7.7% and 17.6%, and median survival 11.9 and 15.7 months, respectively. Key grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia 44% and 25.6%, anemia 6.7% and 7.7%, thrombocytopenia 6.7% and 2.6%, and fatigue 8% in both arms. In an unplanned exploratory analysis, median TTP with (n = 24) and without rash (n = 51) in the CMP arm was 10.3 months vs. 2.8 months (P = .004). On multivariable analysis,rash was significantly associated with TTP (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.43; P = .01).

Conclusions

The treatment with CMP is not recommended in unselected men with docetaxel-treated CRPC, although rash might help develop tailored therapy.     

Phase II randomized study of weekly docetaxel alone or plus UFUR treatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who failed previous chemotherapy

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and efficacy of adding UFUR (UFT, tegafur/uracil) into weekly docetaxel treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients were randomized into two arms: docetaxel 40mg/m(2) intravenous infusion (IV) on days 1 and 8 of every 3 weeks (arm D), and docetaxel 35mg/m(2) IV on days 1 and 8 plus daily oral UFUR 150mg/m(2) of every 3 weeks (arm DU), with arm D as a control arm. Treatment was given to a maximum of 6 cycles and carried out in the outpatient clinic. RESULTS: From January 2005 to March 2006, 48 patients were enrolled and randomized into the study, with 24 patients in each arm. The mean number of cycles of treatment was 4 in the D arm and 3.5 in the DU arm. Objective response rates were 29.2% in the D arm and 8.3% in the DU arm (p=0.067). Toxicities were few and mild in degree in both arms. Median time to disease progression was 4.5 months in the D arm and 2.1 months in the DU arm (p=0.4682). Median survival time was 10.9 months in the D arm and 15.2 months in the DU arm (p=0.8442). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of UFUR to weekly docetaxel treatment did not improve response rate and time to disease progression in NSCLC patients who failed previous platinum-based chemotherapy.     

A systematic review of the effectiveness of docetaxel and mitoxantrone for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer

A systematic review was performed to evaluate the clinical effectiveness of docetaxel in combination with prednisolone (docetaxel is licensed in the UK for use in combination with prednisone or prednisolone for the treatment of patients with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. Prednisone is not used in the UK, but it is reasonable to use docetaxel plus prednisone data in this review of docetaxel plus prednisolone) for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. A scoping search identified a trial of docetaxel plus prednisone vs mitoxantrone plus prednisone, but did not identify any trials comparing docetaxel plus prednisolone/prednisone with any other treatments. Therefore, we considered additional indirect evidence that would enable a comparison of docetaxel plus prednisolone/prednisone with other chemotherapy regimens and active supportive care. Systematic searching (upto April 2005) identified seven randomised controlled trials. One large well-conducted trial assessed docetaxel plus prednisone vs mitoxantrone plus prednisone; this showed statistically significant improvements with 3-weekly docetaxel in terms of overall survival, quality of life, pain response and PSA decline. Two other chemotherapy regimens that included docetaxel with estramustine also showed improved outcomes in comparison with mitoxantrone plus prednisone. Three trials that compared mitoxantrone plus corticosteroids with corticosteroids alone were identified and their results for overall survival combined, which showed very little difference between the two groups. The addition of clodronate to mitoxantrone plus prednisone showed no significant differences in comparison with mitoxantrone plus prednisone alone. The evidence suggests that chemotherapy regimens containing 3-weekly docetaxel are superior to mitoxantrone or corticosteroids alone.     

Chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer: Results of new clinical trials and future studies

Our understanding of the role of chemotherapy for advanced prostate cancer has improved considerably in 2004 with the publication of two large randomized phase III trials and the approval by the US Food and Drug Administration of docetaxel and prednisone for metastatic hormone-refractory disease. Although treatment is still considered palliative in nature, studies of chemotherapy for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) have demonstrated improved overall survival compared with older regimens as well as clinically significant improvements in important endpoints, such as quality of life and time to progression. In particular, docetaxel has emerged as first-line therapy on an every-3-week schedule for metastatic HRPC, replacing mitoxantrone, as recently reported in the TAX327 trial. Docetaxel and estramustine combinations have the disadvantage of significant cardiovascular and gastrointestinal toxicity, and further use of estramustine is likely unwarranted as first-line therapy. Future trials examining novel biologic agents and combination therapies should use single-agent docetaxel as the reference standard. The role of chemotherapy for advanced disease in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting, in biochemically (PSA) relapsed patients, and as second-line therapy for relapsed disease, remains a subject of active clinical investigation.