首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
相似文献
 共查询到15条相似文献,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
目的探讨血清甲胎蛋白异质体(AFP-L3)、高尔基体糖蛋白-73(GP73)及甲胎蛋白(AFP)检测在老年人原发性肝癌(HCC)的诊断价值。 方法研究对象为2014年1月至2016年3月就诊于福建医科大学附属第二医院普外科年龄>60岁的老年患者,共80例;其中HCC组40例,肝良性肿瘤组21例,肝硬化组19例。采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)法检测血清GP73水平,电化学发光法检测血清AFP和AFP-L3水平,微量离心柱法分离AFP-L3,并计算甲胎蛋白异质体比例(AFP-L3%)。绘制受试者工作特征曲线(ROC),分析AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73单独用于HCC鉴别诊断效果。所有入组患者均签署知情同意书,经医院伦理委员会研究通过。 结果各组间血清AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73水平差异有统计学意义(F=213.04,151.98,231.80,657.04;P<0.01)。HCC组血清AFP、AFP-L3、AFP-L3%、GP73水平[(681.41±195.56)μg/L,(138.11±44.00)μg/L,(15.31±3.28)%,(158.18±14.78)μg/L]高于肝良性肿瘤组[(7.94±3.50)μg/L,(0.41±0.28)μg/L,(3.58±0.51)%,(49.26±8.76)μg/L],差异具有统计学意义(q=22.41,22.21,25.18,47.34;P<0.01);HCC组高于肝硬化组[(64.19±33.59)μg/L,(3.94±2.91)μg/L,(4.23±0.71)%,(46.88±11.64)μg/L],差异具有统计学意义(q=25.18,23.56,27.72,47.63;P<0.01)。ROC曲线下面积分别为0.744,0.799,0.720,0.875;GP73曲线下面积最大。AFP诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为62.5%、80.0%,AFP-L3诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为70.0%、77.5%,GP73诊断HCC敏感度及特异度为90.0%、70.0%。AFP与AFP-L3联合检测后敏感度为86.7%,特异度为95.5%;AFP与GP73联合检测后敏感度为96.3%,特异度为95.5%;AFP-L3与GP73联合检测后敏感度为97.0%,特异度为93.3%。 结论GP73、AFP-L3有望成为新的诊断原发性肝癌的血清标志物,血清AFP-L3、GP73、AFP联合检测联合应用能弥补单项血清标志物的不足,对提高老年HCC的诊断具有一定价值。  相似文献   

2.
目的 探讨高尔基体糖蛋白73(GP-73)、磷脂酰肌醇蛋白聚糖3(GPC3)、甲胎蛋白异质体百分比(AFP-L3%)联合检测在原发性肝癌诊断中的应用。方法 选择肝癌患者154例(肝癌组),肝硬化患者78例(肝硬化组),健康对照者56例(对照组),用酶联免疫法分别测出GP-73、GPC3、AFP-L3的浓度。然后分别按照检测项目统计分析。结果 肝癌组中GP-73、GPC3、AFP-L3%的水平明显高于肝硬化组和对照组(P<0.05);肝癌组中GP-73、GPC3、AFP-L3%的阳性率分别为66.2%、72.1%、53.2%。三项联合检测的阳性率可达到97.9%。高于任何单项和联合检测的敏感度和准确度。肝癌组中GP-73、AFP-L3%在AFP不同水平内比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 GP-73、GPC3、AFP-L3%三者联合检测提高原发性肝癌诊断的敏感度和准确度,对鉴别诊断早期肝癌有参考意义。  相似文献   

3.
高尔基体蛋白73及其基因检测对原发性肝癌诊断的价值   总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2  
目的 评价分析GP73和GP73 mRNA在PHC中的诊断价值,探讨血清中GP73和AFP联合检测对PHC诊断和高危人群普查的意义,为PHC诊断和普查提供一种新方法 .方法 采用ELISA对73例PHC、13例肝硬化、32例肝炎和62名健康人的血清GP73、AFP水平进行检测,采用SYBR Green实时荧光定量PCR法检测各组外周血单个核细胞GP73 mRNA的相对表达量,以Ct值比较法计算GP73 mRNA相对表达水平,同时检测分析8份正常肝组织和8份肝癌组织的GP73 mRNA相对表达水平.结果 ELISA检测4组血清GF73、AFP结果 显示,总体比较经Kruskal-Wallis检验,4组间差异有统计学意义(H值分别为89.6、52.0,P均<0.01),全血GP73 mRNA含量4组间差异无统计学意义(H=4.33,P>0.05).组间多重比较Mann-Whitney检验结果显示,PHC组血清GP73的含量[166.7(162.7-231.8)μL]与肝硬化[57.3(46.6~113.6)μg/L]、肝炎[29.6(26.2~54.5)μg/L]及健康对照组[25.1(20.8~29.4)μg/L]比较,差异有统计学意义(U值分别为246、297、349,P均<0.01),各组血清AFP的含量分别为380.9(258.5~ 503.2)μg/L、3.8(1.3~14.5)μg/L、5.1(2.4~7.8)μg/L、2.8(2.2~5.7)μg/L,差异亦有统计学意义(U值分别为246、419、790,P均<0.01).肝癌组织GP73 mRNA表达量(12.64)显著高于正常肝组织(1.00).以ROC曲线确定诊断PHC的GP73临界值为123.2μg/L和AFP临界值为10.6 μg/L时,PHC组血清GP73、AFP单项检测的敏感度分别为65.8%和53.4%,特异度分别为95.3%和92.5%,两者联合检测的敏感度为79.5%,特异度为90.7%.结论 GP73蛋白对PHC诊断具有较好的敏感度和特异度;全血标本GP73 mRNA检测不能作为诊断PHC的肿瘤标志,肝组织标本GP73 mRNA检测可作为诊断PHC的肿瘤标志,但存在创伤性大、风险大、患者痛苦等缺点.血清GP73联合AFP检测可有效提高PHC诊断,可用于PHC高危人群的普查及筛选.  相似文献   

4.
目的 探讨甲胎蛋白(AFP)、甲胎蛋白异质体3比率(AFP?L3%)和高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)联合检测在原发性肝癌中的临床诊断价值.方法 分别检测慢性肝炎组、肝硬化组和原发性肝癌组患者血清中AFP、AFP?L3%和GP73水平和阳性率,并对数据进行分析比较.结果 慢性肝炎组、肝硬化组和原发性肝癌组三组AFP水平分别...  相似文献   

5.
目的探讨甲胎蛋白异质体(AFP-L3)及高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)在原发性肝癌诊断中的价值。方法对40例原发性肝癌患者、32例慢性肝炎患者、33例肝硬化患者及40例健康体检者的血清中AFP-L3及GP73等指标水平进行检测,比较4组AFP-L3、GP73等指标水平及阳性检出率。结果原发性肝癌组AFP-L3、GP73等指标水平及阳性检出率均显著高于慢性肝炎组、肝硬化组、健康体检组(P<0.05)。AFP-L3(%)、GP73含量及AFP-L3与GP73联合诊断原发性肝癌的曲线下面积分别为0.911、0.935、0.974。结论 AFP-L3、GP73可作为原发性肝癌患者的临床诊断标志物,二者联合检测可能提高阳性检出率,增加诊断可靠性。  相似文献   

6.
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of GP-/3 protein in gene detection in the patient of primary hepatic carcinoma, to discuss the joint roles of serum GP73 and AFP, and provide a novel method for the diagnosis for PHC and screening for high-risk population. Methods ELISA was used to detect the serum level of GP73 and AFP in 73 cases of PHC, 13 cases of hepatic cirrhosis, 32 cases of hepatitis and 62 cases of health people. SYBR Green real time fluorescence quantitative PCR was used to detect the relative value of GP73 mRNA in the peripheral blood cells of each group. Comparative Ct method was used to evaluate the relative expression levels. Eight cases of normal liver tissues and 8 cases of PHC tissues were detected at the same time to compare the relative expression levels. Results Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the serum levels of GP73 and AFP had significant differences between four groups(H value were 89. 6 and 52.0, P < 0. 01) and the whole blood GP73 mRNA had no significant differences(H =4. 33, P > 0. 05). Mann-Whitney test showed that the serum levels of GP73 had significant differences among PHC groups[166. 7 (162. 7-231.8) μg/L] and liver cirrhosis[57. 3 (46. 6-113. 6) μg/L], hepatitis[29. 6(26. 2-54. 5) μg/L], health group[25.1 (20. 8-29. 4) μg/L] (U value were 246, 297, 349, P < 0. 01).The A FP levels of the four groups were 380. 9 (258.5-503.2) μg/L, 3.8 (1.3-14. 5) μg/L, 5. 1 (2. 4-7. 8)μg/L and 2. 8(2. 2-5.7) μg/L. It also showed significant differences (U value were 246,419 and 790,P <0. 01). The GP73 mRNA expression of PHC liver tissues(12. 64) was significant higher than normal liver tissues (1.00). The critical values for GP73 and AFP was determined to be 123. 2 μg/L and 10. 6 μg/L through the 8OC curves. Under the critical value the sensitivity of GP73 and AFP were 65.8% and 53.4% ,and the specificity of CP73 and AFP were 95.3% and 92. 5% respectively. Joint detection could increase the sensitivity up to 79. 5%, and achieve the high specificity of 90. 7%. Conclusions As a new diagnositic marker of primary hepatic carcinoma, GP73 protein has the very good sensitivity and specificity. The GP73 mRNA in the whole blood sample could not be used for the diagnosis of PHC. But it woule be a good molecular marker for diagnosis of PHC in the liver tissue sample. The joint detection of GP73 and AFP could improve PHC diagnostic performance, and provide an effective approcach to the PHC high-risk screening.  相似文献   

7.
Objective To explore the diagnostic value of GP-/3 protein in gene detection in the patient of primary hepatic carcinoma, to discuss the joint roles of serum GP73 and AFP, and provide a novel method for the diagnosis for PHC and screening for high-risk population. Methods ELISA was used to detect the serum level of GP73 and AFP in 73 cases of PHC, 13 cases of hepatic cirrhosis, 32 cases of hepatitis and 62 cases of health people. SYBR Green real time fluorescence quantitative PCR was used to detect the relative value of GP73 mRNA in the peripheral blood cells of each group. Comparative Ct method was used to evaluate the relative expression levels. Eight cases of normal liver tissues and 8 cases of PHC tissues were detected at the same time to compare the relative expression levels. Results Kruskal-Wallis test showed that the serum levels of GP73 and AFP had significant differences between four groups(H value were 89. 6 and 52.0, P < 0. 01) and the whole blood GP73 mRNA had no significant differences(H =4. 33, P > 0. 05). Mann-Whitney test showed that the serum levels of GP73 had significant differences among PHC groups[166. 7 (162. 7-231.8) μg/L] and liver cirrhosis[57. 3 (46. 6-113. 6) μg/L], hepatitis[29. 6(26. 2-54. 5) μg/L], health group[25.1 (20. 8-29. 4) μg/L] (U value were 246, 297, 349, P < 0. 01).The A FP levels of the four groups were 380. 9 (258.5-503.2) μg/L, 3.8 (1.3-14. 5) μg/L, 5. 1 (2. 4-7. 8)μg/L and 2. 8(2. 2-5.7) μg/L. It also showed significant differences (U value were 246,419 and 790,P <0. 01). The GP73 mRNA expression of PHC liver tissues(12. 64) was significant higher than normal liver tissues (1.00). The critical values for GP73 and AFP was determined to be 123. 2 μg/L and 10. 6 μg/L through the 8OC curves. Under the critical value the sensitivity of GP73 and AFP were 65.8% and 53.4% ,and the specificity of CP73 and AFP were 95.3% and 92. 5% respectively. Joint detection could increase the sensitivity up to 79. 5%, and achieve the high specificity of 90. 7%. Conclusions As a new diagnositic marker of primary hepatic carcinoma, GP73 protein has the very good sensitivity and specificity. The GP73 mRNA in the whole blood sample could not be used for the diagnosis of PHC. But it woule be a good molecular marker for diagnosis of PHC in the liver tissue sample. The joint detection of GP73 and AFP could improve PHC diagnostic performance, and provide an effective approcach to the PHC high-risk screening.  相似文献   

8.
目的 探讨联合高尔基体糖蛋白73(golg glycoprotein, GP73),巨噬细胞移动抑制因子(migration inhibitory factor, MIF)诊断原发性肝癌(primary liver cancer, PLC) 以及预测原发性肝癌患者预后的价值。方法 选择2016 年1 月~2020 年1 月张家口市传染病医院肝病科收治的137 例原发性肝癌患者(肝癌组)、101 例肝良性肿瘤患者(肝良性肿瘤组)和109 例于门诊体检的健康志愿者(健康对照组)。检测血清GP73,MIF 水平,比较原发性肝癌不同病理特征和预后间血清GP73 和MIF 水平差异。Kaplan-Meier 法绘制不同GP73 和MIF 水平原发性肝癌患者生存曲线,受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析GP73 和MIF 诊断原发性肝癌以及预测原发性肝癌患者预后的价值。结果 肝癌组血清GP73(68.53±21.35 μg/L),MIF(123.35±20.48 pg/ml )水平高于肝良性肿瘤组(13.42±6.52μg/L,43.02±7.61pg/ml)和健康对照组(13.13±6.25 μg/L,42.12±7.58 pg/ml),差异有统计学意义(t=25.081~39.309,均P < 0.05)。TNM分期Ⅲ~Ⅳ期血清GP73(75.11±7.16μg/L),MIF(127.62±10.82 pg/ml)水平高于Ⅰ ~ Ⅱ期(54.15±10.42μg/L,114.02±12.05 pg/ml),差异有统计学意义(t=13.696,6.586,均P=0.000),死亡患者血清GP73(78.32±6.06 μg/L),MIF (130.12±6.03 pg/ml)水平高于存活患者(58.00±10.03μg/L,116.07±12.94 pg/ml),差异有统计学意义(t=14.467,8.239,均P < 0.05)。 GP73 ≥ 68.53μg/L 组,MIF ≥ 123.35 pg/ml 组患者生存率[34.29%(24/70),33.80%(24/71)]低于GP73 < 68.53μg/L 组的62.69%(42/67) 和MIF < 123.35 pg/ml 组的63.64%(42/66)(Log-Rankχ2=10.270,11.450,均P < 0.05)。GP73,MIF 联合检测诊断原发性肝癌、预测原发性肝癌患者预后的曲线下面积分别为0.872,0.868,高于单独指标检测(均P < 0.05)。结论 原发性肝癌患者血清GP73,MIF 水平均明显增高,且与TNM 分期和患者预后均存在一定关系,GP73,MIF 联合检测可为原发性肝癌诊断和预后预测提供参考。  相似文献   

9.
目的:探讨高尔基体蛋白73(G P73)在诊断原发性肝癌中的临床应用价值。方法选取兴化市第三人民医院2007年1月至2012年12月住院的甲胎蛋白(AFP)阳性(>10 ng/mL)患者117例,其中原发性肝癌患者51例为肝癌组,将66例非肝癌患者分为肝硬化组32例,慢性乙型肝炎组24例,选取同一时期排除相关肝病患者10例为对照组。收集所有患者血清样本,采用酶联免疫吸附试验测定G P73含量,并作各组间水平比较。结果肝癌组GP73水平为(117.63&#177;25.78)ng/mL ,明显高于肝硬化组的(81.24&#177;18.49)ng/mL、慢性乙型肝炎组的(78.12&#177;16.01)ng/mL和对照组的(45.49&#177;8.78)ng/mL ,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01);GP73诊断原发性肝癌的ROC曲线下面积为0.881。结论 GP73可以作为原发性肝癌临床诊断的分子标志物,对临床具有辅助诊断和鉴别诊断价值。  相似文献   

10.
目的探讨血清高尔基体蛋白73(Golgi protein 73,GP73)和甲胎蛋白(alpha—fetoprotein,AFP)对肝细胞肝癌(hepatocellular carcinoma,HCC)的诊断价值。方法150例HCC患者为HCC组,108例慢性肝炎患者为慢性肝炎组,100例体检健康者为对照组,采用双抗体夹心酶联免疫法检测3组血清GP73水平,采用电化学发光免疫分析法检测AFP水平。结果HCC组血清GP73(212.8(87.0,279.1)μg/L)、AFP(5212.8(1587,22279.1)μg/L)水平高于慢性肝炎组(55.3(27.0,83.2)μg/L和3.5(1.7,15.5)μg/L)和对照组(52.9(17.0,80.4)μg/L和2.9(1.5,14.7)μg/L)(P均〈0.05);HCC组GP73、AFP阳性率分别为69%和70%,二者联合检测诊断HCC的敏感性为83%。结论血清GP73在HCC中高表达,可鉴别肝脏的良、恶性疾病,与AFP联合检测可提高检出率。  相似文献   

11.
目的:探讨血清a-l-岩藻糖苷酶(AFU)、高尔基体糖蛋白73(GP73)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)在原发性肝癌(PHC)诊断中的临床意义。方法采用化学比色速率法、酶联免疫吸附试验和直接化学发光法测定32例PHC患者、42例肝良性疾病患者、50例健康对照者血清AFU、GP73和AFP水平,并进行比较。结果 PHC组患者血清AFU、GP73、AFP水平[(789.4±475.2)mol/L、(205.5±50.8)μg/L、(977.3±637.4)ng/mL]高于肝良性疾病组[(378.3±127.9)mol/L、(77.5±28.9)μg/L、(6.09±1.57)ng/mL]和健康对照组[(347.8±119.6)mol/L、(33.5±7.5)μg/L、(4.17±1.26)ng/mL],差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。以血清AFU、GP73、AFP水平为指标,检测PHC患者的敏感性、特异性分别为75.1%、73.4%、62.2%;86.8%、67.5%、97.8%,3项联合检测的敏感性、特异性分别为93.4%、85.4%。结论3项指标联合检测,可显著增加阳性检出率,有助于PHC的诊断、病情变化判别及治疗效果观察。  相似文献   

12.
目的探讨血清高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)在肝细胞肝癌(HCC)早期诊断中的价值。方法分别检测57例HCC患者、71例肝硬化患者、82例乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)携带者和60例健康人的血清GP73水平及血清甲胎蛋白(AFP)水平,计算受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)下面积及对HCC诊断的敏感性与特异性。结果 HCC组中血清GP73水平显著高于健康对照组(P<0.05),肝硬化组、HBV携带者组血清GP73水平也有一定程度升高,但明显低于HCC组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。通过ROC曲线确定诊断HCC的血清GP73的cut-off值为100.18μg/L,在此临界值下GP73诊断HCC的敏感度和特异度分别为86.0%和93.9%;AFP诊断HCC的cut-off值为37.05μg/L,其诊断HCC的敏感度和特异度分别为77.2%和91.5%。二者联合检测HCC的敏感度为91.2%,特异度为92.5%。血清AFP浓度小于400μg/L的21例HCC患者中,有16例患者(76.19%)血清GP73水平高于临界值。结论 GP73高表达于HCC患者的血清中,对HCC诊断具有较好的敏感性与特异性,可作为肝癌早期诊断的血清标志物,与AFP联合检测可有效提高肝癌诊断的敏感度,特别有助于AFP阴性的肝癌患者的诊断。  相似文献   

13.
目的探讨高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)和甲胎蛋白(AFP)联合检测在原发性肝癌(PHC)诊断中的价值。方法 AFP采用微粒子化学发光法,用美国雅培ARCHITECT i2000SR全自动化学发光仪进行定量检测;GP73采用ELISA法作定量检测,分别对PHC组105例,普通肝病组47例,其他肿瘤对照组43例和健康对照组50例进行两项指标的定量检测和分析。结果 PHC组血清GP73水平均明显高于普通肝病组、其他肿瘤组和健康对照组,差异有统计学意义(P0.05);GP73、AFP及二者联合检测对诊断PHC的灵敏度分别为79.05%、62.86%、94.29%,其受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)下面积(AUC)分别为:0.84、0.71、0.95。结论 GP73和AFP联合检测能提高PHC诊断的敏感性和诊断价值。  相似文献   

14.
王颖 《检验医学与临床》2016,(24):3484-3485
目的探讨血清异常凝血酶原(DCP)、高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)及甲胎蛋白异质体(AFP-L3)联合检测在诊断原发性肝癌(PHC)中的临床价值。方法选取2013年7月至2015年8月该院肿瘤科收治的78例PHC患者,慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)患者86例,肝硬化(LC)患者70例作为研究对象,另选取同期健康体检者80例作为健康对照组,比较4组研究对象DCP、GP73及AFP-L3在不同人群中的血清水平及各项指标单项及联合检测对PHC的诊断效果。结果 PHC组患者DCP、GPF73及AFPL3水平均显著高于其他组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。对于PHC的诊断,单项检测血清GP73的灵敏度显著高于DCP和AFP-L3,差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。血清DCP、GP73和AFP-L3 3项联合检测的灵敏度、特异度及准确度均显著高于单项检测结果,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论血清DCP、GP73及AFP-L3联合检测能有效提高PHC的检出率,对PHC有重要临床诊断意义。  相似文献   

15.
目的:探讨高尔基体蛋白73(GP73)和磷脂酰基醇蛋白聚糖-3(GPC3)联合测定在原发性肝癌(PLC)早期诊断中的价值。方法选择40例PLC患者、48例肝硬化患者、45例肝炎患者及44例健康对照患者,采用酶联免疫法检测血清中的GP73及GPC3水平。结果肝癌组患者血清中GP73为(812.37±81.59)pg/mL,GPC3为(89.27±12.38)ng/mL,GPC3、GP73阳性表达率分别为82.5%、87.5%,均明显高于其他3组,肝硬化组与肝炎组GPC3、GP73表达水平、阳性表达率显著高于健康对照组;GPC3、GP73联合检测灵敏度、特异度、准确度分别为92.5%、100%、93.81%,显著高于GP73、GPC3单一检测(P<0.05)。结论 GP73与GPC3联合检测可显著提高PHC准确率,对PLC的早期诊断具有较高的价值。  相似文献   

设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号