Abbott RealTime Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Assays for Prediction of Sustained Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

Two commercial real-time PCR assays are currently available for sensitive hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification: the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART) and Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay (CAP/CTM). We assessed whether the two real-time PCR assays were more effective than Roche Cobas Amplicor HCV Monitor test, v.2.0 (CAM) for prediction of the sustained virological response (SVR) to pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) in chronic hepatitis C. Sixty patients chronically infected with HCV genotype 1b (37 males and 23 females, 53 ± 12 years of age) were treated with PEG-IFNα2b plus RBV for 48 weeks. Stored specimens at nine time points for each patient (at baseline, on treatment, and 24 weeks after treatment) were tested by the two real-time PCR assays and CAM. Twenty-six (43.3%) patients reached SVR. The positive predictive values (PPVs) for SVR of undetectable HCV RNA at week 12 by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM were 74.3%, 88.0%, and 95.2%, respectively. An undetectable HCV RNA level by CAM, ART, and CAP/CTM correctly predicted SVR at week 4 in 100%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 5 to 8 in 91.7%, 100%, and 100% of patients, at weeks 9 to 12 in 55.6%, 75%, and 87.5% of patients, and at weeks 13 to 24 in 0%, 26.7%, and 40% of patients, respectively. Of 16 patients who relapsed after treatment, HCV RNA was detectable in 2 patients at the end of treatment by CAP/CTM but undetectable by ART and CAM. HCV RNA tests using ART and CAP/CTM are considered to be more effective at predicting SVR than CAM, and the PPV for SVR was slightly higher in CAP/CTM than in ART.     

The Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Test,Version 2.0, Real-Time PCR Assay Accurately Quantifies Hepatitis C Virus Genotype 4 RNA

Accurate hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA quantification is mandatory for the management of chronic hepatitis C therapy. The first-generation Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test (CAP/CTM HCV) underestimated HCV RNA levels by >1-log₁₀ international units/ml in a number of patients infected with HCV genotype 4 and occasionally failed to detect it. The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM HCV v2.0), to accurately quantify HCV RNA in a large series of patients infected with different subtypes of HCV genotype 4. Group A comprised 122 patients with chronic HCV genotype 4 infection, and group B comprised 4 patients with HCV genotype 4 in whom HCV RNA was undetectable using the CAP/CTM HCV. Each specimen was tested with the third-generation branched DNA (bDNA) assay, CAP/CTM HCV, and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0. The HCV RNA level was lower in CAP/CTM HCV than in bDNA in 76.2% of cases, regardless of the HCV genotype 4 subtype. In contrast, the correlation between bDNA and CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 values was excellent. CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantified HCV RNA levels in the presence of an A-to-T substitution at position 165 alone or combined with a G-to-A substitution at position 145 of the 5′ untranslated region of HCV genome. In conclusion, CAP/CTM HCV v2.0 accurately quantifies HCV RNA in genotype 4 clinical specimens, regardless of the subtype, and can be confidently used in clinical trials and clinical practice with this genotype.     

Necessity for Reassessment of Patients with Serogroup 2 Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and Undetectable Serum HCV RNA

We encountered a patient positive for anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) whose serum HCV RNA was undetectable with the Roche AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV assay (CAP/CTM) version 1 but showed a high viral load with the Abbott RealTime HCV assay (ART). Discrepancies in the detectability of serum HCV RNA were investigated among 891 consecutive patients who were positive for anti-HCV. Specific nucleotide variations causing the undetectability of HCV RNA were determined and confirmed by synthesizing RNA coding those variations. Serum samples with the discrepancies were also reassessed by CAP/CTM version 2. Among the 891 anti-HCV-positive patients, 4 patients had serum HCV RNA levels that were undetectable by CAP/CTM version 1 despite having levels of >5 log IU/ml that were detected by ART. All four patients had HCV genotype 2a and high titers of anti-HCV. Sequencing of the HCV 5′ noncoding regions revealed 2 common variations, A at nucleotide (nt) 145 and T at nt 151. Synthesized RNAs of the HCV 5′ noncoding region with standard (NCR145G151C) and variant nucleotides at nt 145 and nt 151 were quantified with CAP/CTM. RNAs of NCR145G151C and NCR145G151T were quantifiable with CAP/CTM version 1, while those of NCR145A151T and NCR145A151C went undetected. The substitution from G to A at nt 145 specifically conferred this undetectability, while this undetectability was reverted in synthesized HCV RNA with correction of this variation. Reassessment of these samples by CAP/CTM version 2 resulted in similar levels of HCV RNA being detected by ART. We conclude that HCV patients with undetectable HCV RNA by CAP/CTM version 1 should be reassessed for viral quantification.     

Second-Generation Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV Quantitative Test for Viral Load Monitoring: a Novel Dual-Probe Assay Design

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA viral load (VL) monitoring is a well-established diagnostic tool for the management of chronic hepatitis C patients. HCV RNA VL results are used to make treatment decisions with the goal of therapy to achieve an undetectable VL result. Therefore, a sensitive assay with high specificity in detecting and accurately quantifying HCV RNA across genotypes is critical. Additionally, a lower sample volume requirement is desirable for the laboratory and the patient. This study evaluated the performance characteristics of a second-generation real-time PCR assay, the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV quantitative test, version 2.0 (CAP/CTM HCV test, v2.0), designed with a novel dual-probe approach and an optimized automated extraction and amplification procedure. The new assay demonstrated a limit of detection and lower limit of quantification of 15 IU/ml across all HCV genotypes and was linear from 15 to 100,000,000 IU/ml with high accuracy (<0.2-log₁₀ difference) and precision (standard deviation of 0.04 to 0.22 log₁₀). A specificity of 100% was demonstrated with 600 HCV-seronegative specimens without cross-reactivity or interference. Correlation to the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HCV test (version 1) was good (n = 412 genotype 1 to 6 samples, R² = 0.88; R² = 0.94 without 105 genotype 4 samples). Paired plasma and serum samples showed similar performance (n = 25, R² = 0.99). The sample input volume was reduced from 1 to 0.65 ml in the second version. The CAP/CTM HCV test, v2.0, demonstrated excellent performance and sensitivity across all HCV genotypes with a smaller sample volume. The new HCV RNA VL assay has performance characteristics that make it suitable for use with currently available direct-acting antiviral agents.     

Clinical evaluation of the COBAS Ampliprep/COBAS TaqMan for HCV RNA quantitation in comparison with the branched-DNA assay

Diagnosis and monitoring of HCV infection relies on sensitive and accurate HCV RNA detection and quantitation. The performance of the COBAS AmpliPrep/COBAS TaqMan 48 (CAP/CTM) (Roche, Branchburg, NJ), a fully automated, real-time PCR HCV RNA quantitative test was assessed and compared with the branched-DNA (bDNA) assay. Clinical evaluation on 576 specimens obtained from patients with chronic hepatitis C showed a good correlation (r = 0.893) between the two test, but the CAP/CTM scored higher HCV RNA titers than the bDNA across all viral genotypes. The mean bDNA versus CAP/CTM log10 IU/ml differences were -0.49, -0.4, -0.54, -0.26 for genotype 1a, 1b, 2a/2c, 3a, and 4, respectively. These differences reached statistical significance for genotypes 1b, 2a/c, and 3a. The ability of the CAP/CTM to monitor patients undergoing antiviral therapy and correctly identify the weeks 4 and 12 rapid and early virological responses was confirmed. The broader dynamic range of the CAP/CTM compared with the bDNA allowed for a better definition of viral kinetics. In conclusion, the CAP/CTM appears as a reliable and user-friendly assay to monitor HCV viremia during treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis. Its high sensitivity and wide dynamic range may help a better definition of viral load changes during antiviral therapy.     

Comparison between the automated Roche Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test version 2.0 assay and its version 1 and Nuclisens HIV-1 EasyQ version 2.0 assays when measuring diverse HIV-1 genotypes in China

Background

Several commercially available HIV-1 viral load assays based on real-time detection technology and automated platforms are available. It is not clear how the diversity of HIV-1 genotypes impacts the ability to consistently detect HIV-1 viral loads.

Objectives

To examine whether the diversity of HIV-1 genotypes impacts the ability of the Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 test version 2.0 (CAP/CTM v2.0), its version 1.0 (CAP/CTM v1.0) and the NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1 version 2.0 (EasyQ v2.0) assays to consistently determine the viral loads.

Study design

The three assays were used to measure the viral load in 178 plasma samples with diverse genotypes from treatment-naive patients.

Results

CAP/CTM v2.0 showed significant correlation and high agreement with CAP/CTM v1.0 and EasyQ v2.0. CAP/CTM v2.0 showed excellent detection of clade B samples compared with CAP/CTM v1.0 and EasyQ v2.0. However, significant differences were observed when using CAP/CTM v2.0 to test clade BC and AE samples. The HIV-1 load measured by CAP/CTM v2.0 differed by >0.5 log IU/ml in 59.52% and 72.62% of clade BC samples, and in 57.14% and 85.71% of clade AE samples, compared with CAP/CTM v1.0 and EasyQ v2.0, respectively. CAP/CTM v2.0 was more precise (13.18%) than EasyQ v2.0 (29.21%), and both assays showed good linearity (R ≥ 0.9926).

Conclusions

The three assays may not deliver consistent results for samples belonging to clades BC and AE. It is strongly suggested that the version of the HIV-1 viral load assay used initially is also used at follow-up.     

Performance of the Abbott RealTime and Roche Cobas TaqMan hepatitis C virus (HCV) assays for quantification of HCV genotypes

We evaluated the Abbott RealTime (ART) and Roche Cobas TaqMan Hepatitis C virus (HCV) viral load assays for quantification of HCV genotypes in patient specimens. The ART HCV assay was a more sensitive and precise tool for accurate HCV viral load quantification across the HCV genotypes tested, especially genotype 1b.     

Detection and quantitation of HCV RNA using real-time PCR after automated sample processing

There is considerable evidence that the loss of hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA during the first 3 months of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is a prognostic marker of response to therapy. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays for quantifying HCV RNA in plasma or serum are now commercially available. The extraction of HCV RNA can also be automated. This report analyses the performance of the COBAS Ampliprep-COBAS Taqman 48 (CAP/CTM) real-time PCR assay and compares this new test with the COBAS Amplicor HCV Monitor v 2.0 assay (CAM). CAP/CTM was 100% specific. The assay was linear across a wide range of HCV RNA concentrations without sample dilution. The intra-assay variation was 0.3-3.3% and the interassay variation was 1.5-6.7%. A total of 118 clinical samples with different HCV genotypes were assayed using both methods. The results obtained using the two methods were well correlated (r = 0.89, P < 0.001). The mean difference [CAP/CTM-CAM] was 0.17 log IU/ml and it was not influenced by the HCV genotype or by the subtype. It is concluded that the new CAP/CTM system is adequate for quantifying HCV RNA in clinical practice.     

Comparison of three Roche hepatitis B virus viral load assay formats

Two FDA-approved (in vitro diagnostic [IVD]) hepatitis B virus (HBV) viral load assays, the manual Cobas TaqMan HBV Test for use with the High Pure System (HP) and the automated Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan HBV Test v2.0 (CAP/CTM), were compared to a modified (not FDA-approved) version of the HP assay by automating the DNA extraction using the Total Nucleic Acid Isolation (TNAI) kit on the Cobas AmpliPrep. On average, CAP/CTM measurements were 0.08 log IU/ml higher than HP results (n = 206), and TNAI results were 0.17 log IU/ml higher than HP results (n = 166). The limit of detection (LOD), as determined by probit analysis using dilutions of the 2nd HBV international standard, was 10.2 IU/ml for CAP/CTM. The data sets for HP and TNAI were insufficient for probit analysis; however, there was 100% detection at ≥ 5 or ≥ 10 IU/ml for TNAI and HP, respectively. Linearity was demonstrated between 60 and 2,000,000 IU/ml, with slopes between 0.95 and 0.99 and R(2) values of >0.99 for all assays. Total precision (log percent coefficient of variance [CV]) was between 0.8% and 2.1% at 4.3 log IU/ml and between 1.4% and 4.9% at 2.3 log IU/ml. Correlation of samples, reproducibility, linearity, and LOD were acceptable and similar in all assays. The CAP/CTM assay and, to a lesser extent, the TNAI assay reduced hands-on time due to automation. There were no instances of contamination detected in negative samples during the course of the study, despite testing several samples up to 9.6 log IU/ml. The incidence of false-positive negative controls in HP and CAP/CTM clinical testing was <0.5% over 6 to 7 months of testing.     

HIV-1 load comparison using four commercial real-time assays

The HIV-1 RNA viral load is commonly used for the monitoring of disease progression and antiretroviral treatment of HIV-1-infected patients. Since the misestimating of values could lead to inappropriate therapeutical management, the comparative performances, especially the ability to span the genetic diversity of HIV-1, of available automated real-time assays need to be evaluated. We conducted a prospective study with 74 consenting patients enrolled between March 2007 and November 2008. A blood sample was obtained at the time of diagnosis of HIV seropositivity and blindly tested for HIV-1 RNA by at least 4 commercial tests: the Abbott m2000 RealTime HIV-1, bioMérieux NucliSens EasyQ HIV-1, version 1.2 (v1.2), and Cobas AmpliPrep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM) v1.0 and v2.0 assays. The means of difference were null between CAP/CTM v2.0 and Abbott for CRF02_AG subtypes but positive in favor of CAP/CTM v2.0 for genotype B and negative in favor of NucliSens for all genotypes. The standard deviation (SD) of difference ranged from 0.3 to 0.59, depending on the considered couples of assays. Reliabilities of these four tests, appreciated by the standard deviation of difference between the measurement and the estimated "true" viral load and by the coefficient of reliability, were significantly different (P < 10(-4)) among each other. Significant differences were also observed within each group of HIV-1 genotype. The global disparity was higher for CRF02_AG than for B subtypes. This study indicates a risk of viral load misestimating or discrepancies between techniques, depending on the HIV-1 subtype, and speaks in favor of using the same assay for the monitoring of HIV-1-infected patients.     

Evaluation of an automated, highly sensitive, real-time PCR-based assay (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark) for quantification of HCV RNA

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and its therapy is based on qualitative and quantitative measurement of HCV RNA. OBJECTIVES: A new assay that employs automated specimen extraction and real-time RT-PCR (COBAS Amplipreptrade mark/COBAS TaqMantrade mark, "CAP/CTM", Roche Diagnostics, Pleasanton, USA) was designed for linear quantification and highly sensitive detection of HCV RNA. STUDY DESIGN: The performance characteristics of CAP/CTM were compared to standard RT-PCR-based COBAS Amplicor Monitor 2.0 (CAM) assay in a multicenter study. RESULTS: The limit of detection of CAP/CTM was 7.4IU/ml (95% CI 6.2-10.6) and clinical specificity was 99%. The linear range of HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM was between 28 and 1.4x10(7)IU/ml, with a correlation coefficient between expected and observed results of >0.99. A fivefold dilution of serum- or plasma-samples showed a linear correlation of HCV RNA levels in undiluted and diluted samples. Analyses of the mean intra- and inter-assay imprecision within the linear range of quantification showed a coefficient of variation of 3% and 3%, respectively. HCV genotypes 1a/b, 2b, 3a, 4, 5 and 6 were equally quantified by the CAP/CTM and CAM assay with mean deviations ranging from -0.29log(10) to 0.32log(10)IU/ml. HCV RNA quantification by CAP/CTM and CAM was highly concordant (correlation coefficient of 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: The CAP/CTM assay is a reliable and robust assay for highly sensitive detection and quantification of HCV RNA within a broad linear range.     

Hepatitis C virus RNA quantitation in a nationwide French cohort of patients co-infected with HIV and HCV: should the same test be applied to all samples?

In the ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH Cohort, HCV RNA measurement was performed with one of the two available real-time PCR assays [Roche Cobas AmpliPrep-Cobas TaqMan HCV (CAP-CTM) and the Abbott Real-Time HCV (ART)], according to the assay used in each center. To comply with the recommendations for using the same assay in multicenter clinical trials, all the 204 samples analyzed with ART were retested retrospectively by CAP-CTM. The aim of this study was to assess the usefulness of this strategy in real-life situations. A significant and positive correlation was observed between HCV RNA levels measured in the same samples with ART and CAP-CTM with all the genotypes tested. However, in 33 of the 204 (16%) clinical samples, the individual difference between HCV RNA levels measured by both assays was above ±0.5 log(10)IU/ml. Such viral load variations above 0.5 log(10) should be considered as significant. HCV RNA levels estimated by CAP-CTM for genotype 4 were significantly lower than those for genotypes 1, 2, and 3 (P<0.0001). This study shows that using the same assay in multicenter trials and cohorts is still relevant due to inter-assay differences observed in HCV plasma load measurements.     

Consistency of quantitation of HCV genotype 4 from egypt across three HCV‐RNA amplification assays

Different quantitative assays for HCV‐RNA are available that report test results in International Units (IU)/ml based on the WHO International Standard. Thus, assays have been calibrated with standard material containing HCV genotype 1, so the consistency of quantitation might differ between assays for other HCV genotypes. Three commercial HCV nucleic acid amplification techniques (HCV–NAT) were compared for quantitation consistency of genotype 4 and 1 specimens from an Egyptian blood donor panel (n = 92). Consistency of quantitation between HCV–NATs was higher for genotype 1 than for genotype 4. Most quantitative results reported by the assays were in the same range, but some genotype 4 samples were missed by two of the assays. The Abbott assay showed higher concentrations for genotype 4 than the two Roche assays. Follow‐up investigations of individuals should use the same assay unless another assay has been validated properly. Standardization of HCV–NAT assays remains an issue. J. Med. Virol. 80:2086–2091, 2008. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Viral load assay sensitivity and low level viremia in HAART treated HIV patients

BackgroundThe recent introduction of highly sensitive viral load assays resulted in a significant increase in number of treated HIV-infected patients with a detectable viral load. The significance of a viral load between 20 and 50 copies/mL remains unclear.ObjectivesTo compare the performance of three viral load assays, with special attention for specificity and sensitivity at the lowest level of quantification.Study designSamples (n = 181) were selected from 62 HIV-positive individuals that experience viral blips or episodes of low but detectable viremia under antiretroviral treatment, and from 216 HIV-negative individuals. Each sample was tested in at least two of three assays: the Cobas Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor (CAP/CA), the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 1 (CAP/CTM1) and the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan HIV-1 version 2 (CAP/CTM2).ResultsNo false positive results were recorded. Kappa statistics revealed fair to moderate agreement between the results of the three assays, but important differences in sensitivity were observed, with the highest sensitivity reported for CAP/CTM2 followed by CAP/CTM1 and CAP/CA. The differences in sensitivity remained after equalization of the detection limit for all assays at 50 copies/mL. Analysis of samples collected over time showed that patients with single blips in CAP/CA present with recurrent blips in CAP/CTM1 and persistent detectable viremia in CAP/CTM2.ConclusionsViral load results between 20 and 50 copies/mL in either CAP/CTM1 or CAP/CTM2, indicate true viremia. The availability of highly sensitive assays force reconsideration of the terms ‘undetectable’ viral load and ‘virological success’ of antiretroviral treatment.     

Assessment of early virological response to antiviral therapy by comparing four assays for HCV RNA quantitation using the international unit standard: implications for clinical management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection

WHO International Standards for nucleic acid tests are used widely to compare the different assays used in HCV RNA quantitation. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of the international unit standard for measuring HCV RNA in the management of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Twenty‐seven naïve patients infected chronically by HCV were treated with ribavirin plus PEG‐interferon‐alfa‐2b for 48 weeks. SVR was obtained for 16 patients (the other were non‐responders). For HCV RNA quantitation, four assays were undertaken: Versant HCV RNA 3.0 (Bayer), Real time PCR (TaqMan, Roche), LCx HCV RNA (Abbott), and Cobas Amplicor‐Monitor v2 (Roche). Considering a 2‐log decline at Week 12 after the beginning of therapy, discordant results were found with the four HCV RNA methods in predicting SVR or non‐response. At Week 4 and Week 12, significant differences were observed between Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman, Versant HCV RNA 3.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus LCx HCV RNA, and Cobas Monitor Amplicor HCV 2.0 versus PCR HCV Taqman (P < 0.001). The HCV RNA cutoff, given a 100% negative predictive value at Week 4 and Week 12, differed with the assays used to quantify HCV RNA, despite the use of the IU/ml units. Eighty‐nine percent of serum values for HCV RNA were concordant by the IU standard. All assays, however, failed to detect HCV RNA in some cases. Despite the use of the IU standard HCV‐infected patients might be monitored with only one assay. J. Med. Virol. 78:208–215, 2006. © 2005 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Evaluation of Quantification of HIV-1 RNA Viral Load in Plasma and Dried Blood Spots by Use of the Semiautomated Cobas Amplicor Assay and the Fully Automated Cobas Ampliprep/TaqMan Assay,Version 2.0, in Kisumu,Kenya

In Kenya, HIV-1 viral load monitoring is commonly performed with the Cobas Amplicor using plasma specimens. Interest is growing in transitioning to real-time PCR (RT-PCR), such as the Cobas Ampliprep/Cobas TaqMan (CAP/CTM), using dried blood spots (DBS). Before implementation, direct evaluation of the two assays using DBS field specimens is required. This study compares the sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive values (NPV and PPV, respectively), concordance, and agreement between HIV-1 viral load measurements using plasma and DBS specimens obtained from 512 HIV-1-infected pregnant females enrolled in the Kisumu Breastfeeding Study and tested with the Cobas Amplicor and CAP/CTM assays. The sensitivity and NPV of viral load detection in DBS specimens were higher with CAP/CTM (sensitivity, 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 99.1 to 100.0%; NPV, 100%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 100.0%) than the Cobas Amplicor (sensitivity, 96.6%; 95% CI, 94.3 to 98.1%; NPV, 58.8%; 95% CI, 40.7 to 75.4%). The PPVs were comparable between both assays when using DBS. The specificity of viral load detection in DBS specimens was lower with CAP/CTM (77.8%; 95% CI, 40.0 to 97.2%) than that of the Cobas Amplicor (95.2%; 95% CI, 76.2 to 99.9%). Good concordance and agreement were observed when paired plasma and DBS specimens were tested with both assays. Lower specificity with the CAP/CTM is likely due to proviral HIV-1 DNA amplification and lower detection limits with RT-PCR. However, the CAP/CTM has better sensitivity and higher throughput than the Cobas Amplicor. These findings suggest that DBS may be a suitable alternative to plasma when using RT-PCR, which could increase access to viral load monitoring in resource-limited settings.