Pardoprunox as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, trial

AimsTo determine the efficacy and safety of pardoprunox in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations.MethodsPatients were randomized to pardoprunox (up to 42 mg/day, n = 150) or placebo (n = 144). Pardoprunox was titrated to an optimal dose over 7 weeks, followed by a 12-week stable dose period. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to study endpoint in total daily OFF time, based on patient diaries. Secondary analyses included the change in ON time without troublesome dyskinesias, UPDRS-ADL + Motor ON, UPDRS-ADL OFF and PDQ-39. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of pardoprunox on dyskinesias (UPDRS items 32 + 33), depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) and pain (Visual Analogue Scale).ResultsPardoprunox significantly reduced OFF time versus placebo (?1.62 h/day versus ?0.92 h/day, respectively, p = 0.0215). Compared to placebo, pardoprunox improved ON time without troublesome dyskinesias (p = 0.0386), UPDRS-ADL + Motor ON (p = 0.0003), and UPDRS-ADL OFF (p < 0.0001), while no significant difference was observed on PDQ-39. A high drop-out rate due to adverse events (AEs) (pardoprunox, 37%; placebo, 12%) suggested that the selected dose range may have been too high, and/or titration was too rapid.ConclusionsPardoprunox decreased OFF time and increased ON time without troublesome dyskinesias in levodopa-treated PD patients. The high drop-out rate at the selected doses justifies the investigation of lower doses. The impact of pardoprunox on dyskinesias and non-motor symptoms deserves further investigation.     

Pardoprunox in early Parkinson's disease: Results from 2 large,randomized double‐blind trials

This report presents the results of 2 randomized trials—Rembrandt and Vermeer—on the efficacy and safety of pardoprunox in patients with early Parkinson's disease. Patients with Parkinson's disease with a Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale–Motor score ≥ 10 and modified Hoehn and Yahr stage ≤ 3 were randomized to pardoprunox (fixed doses of 6 mg/day [n = 115] or 12 mg/day [n = 118] or a flexible‐dose range of 12–42 mg/day [n = 116]) or placebo (n = 119) in Rembrandt and pardoprunox 12–42 mg/day (n = 108), pramipexole 1.5–4.5 mg/day (n = 116), or placebo (n = 110) in Vermeer. Pardoprunox showed a significant benefit over placebo in the primary efficacy variable, least‐square mean change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale–Motor score: Rembrandt—fixed doses of 6 and 12 mg/day, ?6.0 and ?4.7 points, respectively; flexible‐dose 12–42 mg/day, ?5.5 points; placebo, ?2.9 points; Vermeer—flexible‐dose 12–42 mg/day, ?4.9 points; placebo, ?2.5 points; pramipexole, ?5.7 points. No minimum effective dose was established. Secondary efficacy parameters supported the results of the primary efficacy variable. Pardoprunox tolerability was dose related: flexible‐dose 12–42 mg/day showed the highest dropout rate due to treatment‐emergent adverse events (Rembrandt, 56.0%; Vermeer, 46.3%) and overall incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (Rembrandt, 97.4%; Vermeer, 92.6%), primarily due to nausea, somnolence, and dizziness. Because pardoprunox showed similar efficacy across all dose groups, these observations suggest that the 12–42 mg/day dose range was higher than therapeutically required. Furthermore, the early onset of treatment‐emergent adverse events and dropouts observed for pardoprunox suggest that titration was too rapid. Pardoprunox significantly improved motor symptoms in patients with early Parkinson's disease, but further investigation into the dose and titration schedule is required to improve tolerability. © 2011 Movement Disorder Society     

Efficacy,safety and tolerability of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy in elderly patients with Parkinson’s disease

Background: Rasagiline, an MAO‐B inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this post hoc analysis, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa were compared with placebo in elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients with PD. Methods: Data were pooled from the Parkinson’s Rasagiline: Efficacy and Safety on the Treatment of ‘OFF’ and Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials with the primary efficacy end‐point being the reduction from baseline in daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy end‐points included scores for Clinical Global Improvement (CGI)‐Examiner during ON time, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)‐ADL during OFF time, UPDRS‐Motor during ON time and total daily ON time with and without troublesome dyskinesia. Tolerability was evaluated from adverse events (AEs) in the two age groups. Results: Rasagiline decreased daily OFF time versus placebo (P < 0.01) and improved CGI‐Examiner score (P = 0.001) and UPDRS‐Motor ON score (P < 0.05). Changes in UPDRS‐ADL OFF score and total daily ON time without dyskinesia also favoured rasagiline but were not significant. Between‐group comparisons (≥70 vs. <70 years) showed that efficacy was unaffected by age for all end‐points (P > 0.1), and rasagiline was well tolerated amongst both groups of patients with a comparable incidence of total and dopaminergic AEs (P > 0.1). Conclusions: Adjunct rasagiline is efficacious and well tolerated in elderly non‐demented patients (≥70 years) with moderate to advanced PD. Confirmation of the efficacy and safety of rasagiline in the elderly patient subgroup is especially relevant because of the increasing number of elderly patients with PD.     

Rotigotine effects on early morning motor function and sleep in Parkinson's disease: A double‐blind,randomized, placebo‐controlled study (RECOVER)

In a multinational, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial (NCT00474058), 287 subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) and unsatisfactory early‐morning motor symptom control were randomized 2:1 to receive rotigotine (2–16 mg/24 hr [n = 190]) or placebo (n = 97). Treatment was titrated to optimal dose over 1–8 weeks with subsequent dose maintenance for 4 weeks. Early‐morning motor function and nocturnal sleep disturbance were assessed as coprimary efficacy endpoints using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III (Motor Examination) measured in the early morning prior to any medication intake and the modified Parkinson's Disease Sleep Scale (PDSS‐2) (mean change from baseline to end of maintenance [EOM], last observation carried forward). At EOM, mean UPDRS Part III score had decreased by ?7.0 points with rotigotine (from a baseline of 29.6 [standard deviation (SD) 12.3] and by ?3.9 points with placebo (baseline 32.0 [13.3]). Mean PDSS‐2 total score had decreased by ?5.9 points with rotigotine (from a baseline of 19.3 [SD 9.3]) and by ?1.9 points with placebo (baseline 20.5 [10.4]). This represented a significantly greater improvement with rotigotine compared with placebo on both the UPDRS Part III (treatment difference: ?3.55 [95% confidence interval (CI) ?5.37, ?1.73]; P = 0.0002) and PDSS‐2 (treatment difference: ?4.26 [95% CI ?6.08, ?2.45]; P < 0.0001). The most frequently reported adverse events were nausea (placebo, 9%; rotigotine, 21%), application site reactions (placebo, 4%; rotigotine, 15%), and dizziness (placebo, 6%; rotigotine 10%). Twenty‐four‐hour transdermal delivery of rotigotine to PD patients with early‐morning motor dysfunction resulted in significant benefits in control of both motor function and nocturnal sleep disturbances. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Early piribedil monotherapy of Parkinson's disease: A planned seven-month report of the REGAIN study.

Piribedil is a D2 dopamine agonist, which has been shown to improve symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD) when combined with L-dopa. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of piribedil monotherapy to placebo in patients with early PD over a 7-month period. Four hundred and five early PD patients were randomized (double-blind) to piribedil (150-300 mg/day) or placebo. L-dopa open-label supplementation was permitted. Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale part III (UPDRS III) score as the last observation on monotherapy over 7 months was the primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes were proportion of responders (UPDRS III improvement > 30%), patients remaining on monotherapy after 7 months, UPDRS III subscores, and UPDRS II. UPDRS III improved on piribedil (-4.9 points) versus a worsening on placebo (2.6 points; estimated effect = 7.26 points; 95% CI = 5.38-9.14; P < 0.0001). The proportion of responders was significantly higher for piribedil (42%) than for placebo (14%) (OR = 4.69; 95% CI = 2.82-7.80; P < 0.001). Piribedil significantly improved several UPDRS III subscores. UPDRS II improved on piribedil by -1.2 points, while it deteriorated by 1.5 points on placebo (estimated effect = 2.71; 95% CI = 1.8-3.62; P < 0.0001). The proportion of patients remaining on monotherapy after 7 months was greater in the piribedil group (OR = 3.72; 95% CI = 2.26-6.11; P < 0.001). Safety was consistent with that reported for other dopamine agonists, gastrointestinal side effects being the most common (22% of patients in piribedil group vs. 14% on placebo). Piribedil is effective and safe as early PD therapy.     

Effect of rasagiline as adjunct therapy to levodopa on severity of OFF in Parkinson's disease

Background: The LARGO study demonstrated that rasagiline 1 mg/day as adjunct to levodopa significantly reduces OFF time to the same magnitude as adjunct entacapone. This substudy of LARGO aimed to assess the effect of rasagiline and entacapone on the motor symptoms of PD during the practically defined OFF state. Methods: LARGO was a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of rasagiline (1 mg/day), entacapone (200 mg with each levodopa dose), and placebo in 687 levodopa‐treated PD patients with motor fluctuations. A substudy of LARGO measured UPDRS motor scores in the practically defined OFF state in 32 rasagiline, 36 entacapone, and 37 placebo patients. Results: Treatment with rasagiline produced a significant improvement over placebo of 5.64 units in UPDRS motor OFF score (P = 0.013 vs. placebo). By contrast, the effect of adjunct entacapone was not significant (P = 0.14 vs. placebo). Whereas rasagiline also showed a trend in reducing the UPDRS‐ADL OFF score (P = 0.058 vs. placebo), no such trend was noted for entacapone (P = 0.26 vs. placebo). Retrospective analysis, using the Bonferroni correction, of UPDRS motor subdomains further revealed that rasagiline, but not entacapone, significantly improved bradykinesia (P < 0.001) and showed trends for improvements in facial expression, speech, and axial impairment during OFF time. Conclusions: This study provides the first objectively measured evidence that adjunct rasagiline 1 mg/day is effective in reducing the severity of motor symptoms in the OFF state. This suggests a continuous effect of rasagiline 1 mg/day throughout the day and night and is consistent with its extended duration of therapeutic action.     

Long‐term results of a multicenter study on subthalamic and pallidal stimulation in Parkinson's disease

We report the 5 to 6 year follow‐up of a multicenter study of bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) and globus pallidus internus (GPi) deep brain stimulation (DBS) in advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. Thirty‐five STN patients and 16 GPi patients were assessed at 5 to 6 years after DBS surgery. Primary outcome measure was the stimulation effect on the motor Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assessed with a prospective cross‐over double‐blind assessment without medications (stimulation was randomly switched on or off). Secondary outcomes were motor UPDRS changes with unblinded assessments in off‐ and on‐medication states with and without stimulation, activities of daily living (ADL), anti‐PD medications, and dyskinesias. In double‐blind assessment, both STN and GPi DBS were significantly effective in improving the motor UPDRS scores (STN, P < 0.0001, 45.4%; GPi, P = 0.008, 20.0%) compared with off‐stimulation, regardless of the sequence of stimulation. In open assessment, both STN‐ and GPi‐DBS significantly improved the off‐medication motor UPDRS when compared with before surgery (STN, P < 0.001, 50.5%; GPi, P = 0.002, 35.6%). Dyskinesias and ADL were significantly improved in both groups. Anti‐PD medications were significantly reduced only in the STN group. Adverse events were more frequent in the STN group. These results confirm the long‐term efficacy of STN and GPi DBS in advanced PD. Although the surgical targets were not randomized, there was a trend to a better outcome of motor signs in the STN‐DBS patients and fewer adverse events in the GPi‐DBS group. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Rotigotine transdermal patch in Chinese patients with early Parkinson's disease: A randomized,double-blind,placebo-controlled pivotal study

IntroductionTwo phase3 studies (SP512; SP513) involving mostly Caucasian patients showed that rotigotine (≤8 mg/24 h) was efficacious and welltolerated in early-stage Parkinson's disease (PD). We report results from a phase 3 study (SP0914/NCT01646268) investigating rotigotine in Chinese patients with early-stage PD.MethodsPatients were randomized 1:1 to rotigotine or placebo, titrated over 1–4 weeks, maintained at optimal/maximum dose (≤8 mg/24 h) for 24 weeks. Primary efficacy variable: change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II + III total score from Baseline to End-of-Maintenance. Secondary variables: UPDRS II + III responders (≥20% decrease in UPDRS II + III) and changes in UPDRS II (activities of daily living [ADL]) and III (motor examination) subscores.ResultsOf 247 patients randomized, 113/124 (91.1%) rotigotine- and 107/123 (87.0%) placebo-treated patients completed the study. Patients: mean (SD) age: 59.4 (10.2) years; time since PD diagnosis: 1.01 (1.22) years, 60.7% male. Rotigotine significantly improved UPDRS II + III total score (change from Baseline LSmean [95%CI] treatment difference, −4.82 [−7.18 to −2.45]; P < 0.0001). UPDRS II + III responder rates were higher with rotigotine (42.3% vs 22.3%; P = 0.0006). UPDRS II and III subscores improved with rotigotine (both subscores: P < 0.0005 vs. placebo). Most frequent adverse events (AEs): nausea (8.9% rotigotine, 3.3% placebo), dizziness (8.1%, 5.7%), pruritus (8.1%, 4.1%), somnolence (8.1%, 3.3%), erythema (6.5%, 1.6%), and vomiting (5.6%, 1.6%). Thirteen (5.3%) patients discontinued due to AEs (6 rotigotine, 7 placebo).ConclusionsRotigotine was efficacious in Chinese patients with early-stage PD, providing benefits to control of ADL and motor function. Rotigotine was generally welltolerated, with similar AEs to those observed in Caucasian patients.     

Metric attributes of the unified Parkinson's disease rating scale 3.0 battery: part II, construct and content validity.

This article is the second of a two-part series concerning the metric properties of the following three Parkinson's disease (PD) scales: modified Hoehn and Yahr staging (H&Y), Schwab and England (S&E), and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) 3.0. Part II focuses on construct and content validity. To assess construct validity, a sample of 1,136 PD patients completed the above-mentioned PD scales. Correlation coefficients between measures of disability and dysfunction [S&E, UPDRS Activities of Daily Living (ADL), and UPDRS Motor Examination] were |r| = 0.69-0.77, indicating good convergent validity. Results showed that the S&E (F(5,945) = 193.47; P < 0.0001) and UPDRS subscales discriminated between modified H&Y stages (F(20,2784) = 25.28; P < 0.001). A panel of 12 to 13 international experts rated the relevance of the scales and items. This enabled the scales' content validity index to be calculated, which ranged from 41.7% (UPDRS Mentation) to 83.3% (UPDRS Motor Examination). In conclusion, while the modified H&Y, S&E, and UPDRS displayed satisfactory construct validity, the content validity of all scales except UPDRS Motor Examination failed to attain adequate standards.     

Orodispersible sublingual piribedil to abort OFF episodes: A single dose placebo‐controlled,randomized, double‐blind,cross‐over study

S90049, a novel sublingual formulation of the non‐ergoline D₂‐D₃ agonist piribedil, has a pharmacokinetic profile promising to provide rapid relief on motor signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). We assessed the efficacy and safety of S90049 in aborting OFF episodes responding to subcutaneous apomorphine in PD patients with motor fluctuations. This was a single‐dose double‐blind double‐placebo 3 × 3 cross‐over study. Optimal tested doses were determined during a previous open‐label titration phase (S90049 median dose: 60 mg, apomorphine: 5 mg). Primary endpoint was the maximal change versus baseline in UPDRS motor score (ΔUPDRS III) assessed after drug administration following an overnight withdrawal of antiparkinsonian medications. Thirty patients (age: 60 ± 8 years, PD duration: 12 ± 6 years, UPDRS III OFF: 37 ± 15) participated. S90049 wassuperior to placebo on ΔUPDRS III (?13 ± 12 versus ?7 ± 9 respectively; estimated difference ?5.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)[?10.4;0.05], P = 0.05). This was also true for secondary outcomes: number of patients switching from OFF to ON (17 on S90049 vs. 8 on placebo, P = 0.03), time to turn ON (P = 0.013) and duration of the ON phase (P = 0.03). In the 17 patients who switched ON on S90049, ΔUPDRS III was similar on S90049 (?21.2 ± 10.1) and apomorphine (?23.6 ± 14.1) (estimated difference: 4.0 95% CI [?2.9;10.9]). S90049 was well tolerated: no serious or unexpected adverse event occurred. A single dose of up to 60 mg of S90049 given sublingually was superior to placebo in improving UPDRS III and aborting a practical OFF in patients with advanced PD. Testing greater doses might improve response rate. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Randomized,double‐blind,multicenter evaluation of pramipexole extended release once daily in early Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended release (ER) administered once daily in early Parkinson's disease (PD). Pramipexole immediate release (IR) administered three times daily (TID) is an efficacious and generally well‐tolerated treatment for PD. A pramipexole ER formulation is now available. We performed a randomized, double‐blind, placebo and active comparator–controlled trial in subjects with early PD. The primary efficacy and safety evaluation of pramipexole ER compared with placebo took place at week 18. Two hundred fifty‐nine subjects were randomized 2:2:1 to treatment with pramipexole ER once daily, pramipexole IR TID, or placebo. Levodopa rescue was required by 7 subjects in the placebo group (14%), 3 subjects in the pramipexole ER group (2.9%, P = 0.0160), and 1 subject in the pramipexole IR group (1.0%, P = 0.0017). Adjusted mean [standard error (SE)] change in Unified Parkinson Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) II [activities of daily living (ADL)] + III (motor) scores from baseline to week 18, including post‐levodopa rescue evaluations, was ?5.1 (1.3) in the placebo group, ?8.1 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0282), and ?8.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0153). Adjusted mean (SE) change in UPDRS ADL + motor scores, censoring post‐levodopa rescue data, was ?2.7 (1.3) in the placebo group, ?7.4 (1.1) in the pramipexole ER group (P = 0.0010), and ?7.5 (1.1) in the pramipexole IR group (P = 0.0006). Adverse events more common with pramipexole ER than placebo included somnolence, nausea, constipation, and fatigue. Pramipexole ER administered once daily was demonstrated to be efficacious compared with placebo and provided similar efficacy and tolerability as pramipexole IR administered TID. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Long‐term antidyskinetic efficacy of amantadine in Parkinson's disease

Several randomized placebo‐controlled trials have consistently shown antidyskinetic effects of amantadine in levodopa treated patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). However, all of these were of short duration and there have been claims that the effect of amantadine on levodopa induced dyskinesias (LID's) wear off after about 9 months of treatment. This randomized placebo‐controlled parallel‐group study was performed to assess the long‐term antidyskinetic effect of amantadine in 32 PD patients, who after having been on stable amantadine therapy for LID over at least one year‐ were switched in a double blind manner to amantadine or placebo and followed for 3 weeks. Dyskinesia duration and intensity were assessed by UPDRS IV items 32 and 33 as well as by patient's diaries. The primary outcome was the score change of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33 between baseline and 3 weeks after treatment as well as the between treatment group comparison of the score change of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33. There was a significant increase of UPDRS IV items 32 + 33 in patients treated with placebo from 3.06 (95% CI, 2.1–4.03) at baseline to 4.28 (95% CI, 3.1–5.4) at three‐week follow‐up (P = 0.02) compared with no significant change between baseline 3.2 (95% CI, 2.1–4.4) to follow‐up 3.6 (95% CI, 2.3–4.8) in patients staying on amantadine. These findings argue for long‐term antidyskinetic efficacy of amantadine in PD patients with LID's. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Randomized,double‐blind,pilot evaluation of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of intravenous glutathione in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients. This was a randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, pilot trial in subjects with PD whose motor symptoms were not adequately controlled with their current medication regimen. Subjects were randomly assigned to receive intravenous glutathione 1,400 mg or placebo administered three times a week for 4 weeks. Twenty‐one subjects were randomly assigned, 11 to glutathione and 10 to placebo. One subject who was assigned to glutathione withdrew from the study for personal reasons prior to undergoing any postrandomization efficacy assessments. Glutathione was well tolerated and there were no withdrawals because of adverse events in either group. Reported adverse events were similar in the two groups. There were no significant differences in changes in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) scores. Over the 4 weeks of study medication administration, UPDRS ADL + motor scores improved by a mean of 2.8 units more in the glutathione group (P = 0.32), and over the subsequent 8 weeks worsened by a mean of 3.5 units more in the glutathione group (P = 0.54). Glutathione was well tolerated and no safety concerns were identified. Preliminary efficacy data suggest the possibility of a mild symptomatic effect, but this remains to be evaluated in a larger study. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Effects of tolcapone, a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, on motor symptoms and pharmacokinetics of levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease

Summary The effects of tolcapone, a catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor, on the bioavailability and efficacy of levodopa were evaluated in 12 patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), 8 of whom showed signs of daily motor fluctuations (wearing-off phenomenon). Motor disabilities were assessed in 12 patients at 7 time points before and after the chronic administration of tolcapone using the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS). The UPDRS score was improved at all points of determination. Eight patients with wearing-off phenomenon on levodopa showed symptomatic improvement on the combination. The area under the curve (AUC) for levodopa increased by 34% (p=0.0059) after the administration of tolcapone. The elimination half-life (T1/2) of levodopa was significantly prolonged by 81% (p=0.0001) after the treatment. The AUC of 3-O-methyldopa, a metabolite of levodopa, was decreased by 79% (p=0.0001) and the Cmax (maximum concentration) was also decreased by 80% after the administration (p=0.0001) of tolcapone. The combination of tolcapone and levodopa was well tolerated. Our findings suggest that tolcapone improves the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in plasma and motor symptoms of fluctuating PD patients. It is suggested that tolcapone may be a useful drug adjunct to levodopa in treating patients with PD with wearing-off phenomena.     

Efficacy of combining levodopa with entacapone on quality of life and activities of daily living in patients experiencing wearing-off type fluctuations

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of levodopa/dopa decarboxylase inhibitor (DDCI) plus entacapone with levodopa/DDCI plus placebo on measures of parkinsonian disability and health-related quality of life (QoL) in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IV study was performed in 270 PD patients randomized to receive either entacapone 200 mg or placebo with each dose of their current levodopa regimen. The primary variables were the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) part II activities of daily living (ADL) and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ)-39 summary index. UPDRS parts I, III-VI, Global Assessment of Change, PDQ-39 subscores, and the Short-Form (SF)-36 and the European Quality of Life five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D) were included as secondary variables. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in ADL scores with levodopa/DDCI/entacapone compared with levodopa/DDCI/placebo at 5 and 13 weeks (-2.3 vs -0.7, respectively; P = 0.0001). However, no significant differences were observed between treatments using the PDQ-39 summary index. UPDRS part III (motor) scores significantly decreased in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group compared with the levodopa/DDCI/placebo group (-5.0 vs -2.9, respectively; P = 0.03). Similarly, the change in the investigators Global Assessment was significantly greater (P = 0.004) in the levodopa/DDCI/entacapone group. There were no significant differences between treatments for any of the PDQ-39 subscores, the SF-36 variables or the EQ-5D utility score. CONCLUSIONS: Levodopa combined with entacapone demonstrated good efficacy in terms of ADL, global function, motor performance and was well tolerated. However, this short-term study did not generate significant improvements in QoL.     

Patient-perceived involvement and satisfaction in Parkinson's disease: effect on therapy decisions and quality of life.

Patient-centered consultation styles are associated with higher patient satisfaction and improved health outcomes in diabetes and hypertension. In outpatient neurology, dissatisfaction with communication relates significantly to noncompliance. We undertook a single-center study in Parkinson's disease (PD) using standardized questionnaires to score patient-perceived involvement in therapy decisions (score 4 = low to 25 = high) and satisfaction with the consultation (score 1 = low to 7 = high). Correlation was tested against health outcomes of Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Motor score, activities of daily living (UPDRS 2 and Schwab and England), Parkinson's disease quality of life (PDQ-39), Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Of 117 patients enrolled, 107 (91%) fully completed the questionnaires. Mean patient-perceived involvement scored 14.4 (SD, 2.8). Mean satisfaction scored 5.3 (SD 0.7). Higher involvement was associated with increased satisfaction (r = 0.28; P = 0.003), particularly distress relief (r = 0.38; P < 0.0001). Communication scores correlated significantly with compliance intent (r = 0.6; P < 0.0001). There was no correlation between either involvement or satisfaction and UPDRS, Schwab and England, MMSE, or GDS. Quality of life was significantly associated with depression, UPDRS, duration of PD, compliance intent, and satisfaction. The significant positive association between compliance intent and quality of life in the more satisfied patient replicates findings in other disease areas. Due attention to these aspects in delivering care to the PD patient is appropriate.     

Responsiveness of impairments and disabilities in Parkinson's disease

The objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness of items of the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) and Motor section of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD). A standardized Response Mean (SRM) per item was calculated using data of four trials (n=376) that randomised patients with early PD to dopamine agonist (DA) monotherapy or placebo. In the ADL section, the SRMs ranged from -0.04 (no effect) to -0.50 (moderate effect). Hand functions were the most responsive ADL items with 'handwriting' showing the largest response. Self-assessed symptoms were the least responsive. In the Motor section, SRMs ranged from -0.09 to -0.60 with bradykinesia items showing the largest response, especially the item 'finger taps'. The tremor items showed the smallest response, however, rest tremor arms was much more responsive than rest tremor of the head and legs or postural tremor. SRMs in the placebo group ranged from 0.08 to -0.21 in the ADL section and from 0.03 to -0.35 in the Motor section. ADL and motor items have comparable and mostly small effect sizes. The most responsive items are in the ADL section hand functions and in the Motor section bradykinesia items. A more responsive ADL section would omit the self-assessed symptoms and the Motor section would retain only rest tremor arms of the tremor items.     

Double-blind, placebo-controlled, unforced titration parallel trial of quetiapine for dopaminergic-induced hallucinations in Parkinson's disease.

We completed a single site, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel design study of quetiapine for hallucinations in PD. Thirty-one subjects with PD and prominent visual hallucinations and Mini-Mental State Examination score >21 were randomly assigned in a 2:1 drug to placebo ratio, up to 200 mg daily of quetiapine or matching placebo given in two doses. They were seen at 3 weeks (100 mg/day) and 12 weeks (200 mg/day, with optional dose reduction). Evaluation included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), the Baylor PD Hallucination Questionnaire, and a battery of neuropsychological tests. The demographics between subjects randomized to drug (n = 21) vs. placebo (n = 10) were similar. The final dose of active drug was 200 (n = 11), 150 (n = 2), 100 (n = 3), and 75 (n = 1) mg per day. All placebo subjects were on the equivalent of 200 mg per day. The UPDRS Activities of Daily Living and Motor scores did not significantly change compared to placebo. Compared to placebo, there were no significant changes in our hallucination questionnaire, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), or question 12 (hallucination item) of the BPRS. There were no significant changes on any of the neuropsychological measures. Adverse events on drug included sedation (n = 9), but no drug-related adverse events precipitated discontinuation and none were rated as serious. Quetiapine, up to 200 mg daily, was well tolerated and did not worsen UPDRS scores; however, there was no significant improvement in psychosis rating scales compared to placebo. Larger doses of drug and greater sample sizes might be considered in future studies.     

The impact of left prefrontal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on depression in Parkinson's disease: A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled study

Based on several open‐label and case studies, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) seems to have an antidepressive effect on patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). However, this hypothesis requires further confirmation. We conducted a randomized, double‐blind placebo‐controlled study to evaluate the effect of rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) on depression and various motor and nonmotor features of PD. Twenty‐two PD patients with mild or moderate depressive episodes were assigned into two groups, one receiving real‐rTMS (90% of resting motor threshold, 5 Hz, 600 pulses‐a‐day for 10 days) over the left DLPFC, and another group receiving sham‐rTMS. An investigator blinded to the treatment performed three video‐taped examinations on each patient: before stimulation (baseline), 1 day (short term), and 30 days after treatment session ended (long‐term effect). Mini‐Mental State Examination, Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn‐Yahr, Epworth Sleepiness, Visual Analog and Montgomery‐Asberg Depression Rating Scales (MADRS), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), and Trail making and Stroop tests were applied. In the actively treated group, not only depression rating scales showed significant improvement 30 days after treatment ended (BDI by 44.4% and MADRS by 26.1%), but also the accuracy of Stroop test (by 16%). We could also demonstrate an insignificant improvement in UPDRS‐III by 7.5 points (31.9%, P = 0.06). In the sham‐treated group none of the examined tests and scales improved significantly after sham stimulation. Our study demonstrated the beneficial effect of the left DLPFC rTMS on depression in PD lasting at least 30 days after treatment. However, this result should be confirmed in patients with severe depression by further clinical trials. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Clinical efficacy of istradefylline (KW‐6002) in Parkinson's disease: A randomized,controlled study

The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy of istradefylline at an oral dose of 20 mg or 40 mg once daily for 12 weeks in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with motor complications on levodopa therapy based on the change in the daily OFF time compared with placebo and to assess the safety at these doses. A total of 363 subjects were randomly assigned to receive 20 mg/day istradefylline (n = 119), 40 mg/day istradefylline (n = 125), or placebo (n = 119). The primary outcome variable was the change from baseline at endpoint in daily OFF time based on patients' ON/OFF diaries. At endpoint, the daily OFF time reduced from baseline by 1.31 hours for 20 mg/day istradefylline (P = 0.013 as compared to the placebo), 1.58 hours for 40 mg/day istradefylline (P < 0.001), and 0.66 hours for placebo; istradefylline significantly reduced the daily OFF time compared with placebo. The UPDRS Part III subscale score (ON state) reduced by 5.7 at endpoint in both istradefylline groups and 3.7 in the placebo group (P = 0.006 for 20 mg/day and P = 0.006 for 40 mg/day group as compared with placebo). The most commonly reported drug‐related treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) was dyskinesia, which occurred in 2.5% (3/119) of subjects receiving placebo, 8.5% (10/118) receiving 20 mg/day istradefylline, and 6.4% (8/125) receiving 40 mg/day istradefylline. We conclude that istradefylline at 20 mg and 40 mg once daily is effective in relieving wearing‐off fluctuations of PD patients. In addition, istradefylline was well tolerated at both doses. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society