共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Parker E. Bohm Michael G. Fehlings Branko Kopjar Lindsay A. Tetreault Alexander R. Vaccaro Karen K. Anderson Paul M. Arnold 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):211-217
Background Context
The timed 30-m walking test (30MWT) is used in clinical practice and in research to objectively quantify gait impairment. The psychometric properties of 30MWT have not yet been rigorously evaluated.Purpose
This study aimed to determine test-retest reliability, divergent and convergent validity, and responsiveness to change of the 30MWT in patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).Study Design/Setting
A retrospective observational study was carried out.Patient Sample
The sample consisted of patients with symptomatic DCM enrolled in the AOSpine North America or AOSpine International cervical spondylotic myelopathy studies at 26 sites.Outcome Measures
Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA), Nurick scale, 30MWT, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Short-Form-36 (SF-36v2) physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS) were the outcome measures.Methods
Data from two prospective multicenter cohort myelopathy studies were merged. Each patient was evaluated at baseline and 6 months postoperatively.Results
Of 757 total patients, 682 (90.09%) attempted to perform the 30MWT at baseline. Of these 682 patients, 602 (88.12%) performed the 30MWT at baseline. One patient was excluded, leaving601 in the analysis. At baseline, 81 of 682 (11.88%) patients were unable to perform the test, and their mJOA, NDI, and SF-36v2 PCS scores were lower compared with those who performed the test at baseline. In patients who performed the 30MWT at baseline, there was very high correlation among the three baseline 30MWT measurements (r=0.9569–0.9919). The 30MWT demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity. It was moderately correlated with the Nurick (r=0.4932), mJOA (r=?0.4424), and SF-36v2 PCS (r=?0.3537) (convergent validity) and poorly correlated with the NDI (r=0.2107) and SF-36v2 MCS (r=?0.1984) (divergent validity). Overall, the 30MWT was not responsive to change (standardized response mean [SRM]=0.30). However, for patients who had a baseline time above the median value of 29 seconds, the SRM was 0.45.Conclusions
The 30MWT shows high test-retest reliability and good divergent and convergent validity. It is responsive to change only in patients with more severe myelopathy. The 30MWT is a simple, quick, and affordable test, and should be used as an ancillary test to evaluate gait parameters in patients with DCM. 相似文献2.
Michael G. Fehlings Carlo Santaguida Lindsay Tetreault Paul Arnold Giuseppe Barbagallo Helton Defino Shashank Kale Qiang Zhou Tim S. Yoon Branko Kopjar 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):102-108
Background Context
It remains unclear whether cervical laminoplasty (LP) offers advantages over cervical laminectomy and fusion (LF) in patients undergoing posterior decompression for degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM).Purpose
The objective of this study is to compare outcomes of LP and LF.Study Design/Setting
This is a multicenter international prospective cohort study.Patient Sample
A total of 266 surgically treated symptomatic DCM patients undergoing cervical decompression using LP (N=100) or LF (N=166) were included.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures were the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score (mJOA), Nurick grade, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Short-Form 36v2 (SF36v2), length of hospital stay, length of stay in the intensive care unit, treatment complications, and reoperations.Methods
Differences in outcomes between the LP and LF groups were analyzed by analysis of variance and analysis of covariance. The dependent variable in all analyses was the change score between baseline and 24-month follow-up, and the independent variable was surgical procedure (LP or LF). In the analysis of covariance, outcomes were compared between cohorts while adjusting for gender, age, smoking, number of operative levels, duration of symptoms, geographic region, and baseline scores.Results
There were no differences in age, gender, smoking status, number of operated levels, and baseline Nurick, NDI, and SF36v2 scores between the LP and LF groups. Preoperative mJOA was lower in the LP compared with the LF group (11.52±2.77 and 12.30±2.85, respectively, p=.0297). Patients in both groups showed significant improvements in mJOA, Nurick grade, NDI, and SF36v2 physical and mental health component scores 24 months after surgery (p<.0001). At 24 months, mJOA scores improved by 3.49 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.84, 4.13) in the LP group compared with 2.39 (95% CI: 1.91, 2.86) in the LF group (p=.0069). Nurick grades improved by 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23, 1.90) in the LP group and 1.18 (95% CI: 0.92, 1.44) in the LF group (p=.0770). There were no differences between the groups with respect to NDI and SF36v2 outcomes. After adjustment for preoperative characteristics, surgical factors and geographic region, the differences in mJOA between surgical groups were no longer significant. The rate of treatment-related complications in the LF group was 28.31% compared with 21.00% in the LP group (p=.1079).Conclusions
Both LP and LF are effective at improving clinical disease severity, functional status, and quality of life in patients with DCM. In an unadjusted analysis, patients treated with LP achieved greater improvements on the mJOA at 24-month follow-up than those who received LF; however, these differences were insignificant following adjustment for relevant confounders. 相似文献3.
Ronald H.M.A. Bartels Roland D. Donk Wim I.M. Verhagen Allard J.F. Hosman André L.M. Verbeek 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1625-1632
Background Context
The results of meta-analyses are frequently reported, but understanding and interpreting them is difficult for both clinicians and patients. Statistical significances are presented without referring to values that imply clinical relevance.Purpose
This study aimed to use the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to rate the clinical relevance of a meta-analysis.Study Design
This study is a review of the literature.Patient Sample
This study is a review of meta-analyses relating to a specific topic, clinical results of cervical arthroplasty.Outcome Measure
The outcome measure used in the study was the MCID.Methods
We performed an extensive literature search of a series of meta-analyses evaluating a similar subject as an example. We searched in Pubmed and Embase through August 9, 2016, and found articles concerning meta-analyses of the clinical outcome of cervical arthroplasty compared with that of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in cases of cervical degenerative disease. We evaluated the analyses for statistical significance and their relation to MCID. MCID was defined based on results in similar patient groups and a similar disease entity reported in the literature.Results
We identified 21 meta-analyses, only one of which referred to MCID. However, the researchers used an inappropriate measurement scale and, therefore, an incorrect MCID. The majority of the conclusions were based on statistical results without mentioning clinical relevance.Conclusions
The majority of the articles we reviewed drew conclusions based on statistical differences instead of clinical relevance. We recommend introducing the concept of MCID while reporting the results of a meta-analysis, as well as mentioning the explicit scale of the analyzed measurement. 相似文献4.
Michael K. Urban Kara Fields Sean W. Donegan Jonathan C. Beathe David W. Pinter Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Ronald G. Emerson 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1889-1896
Background Context
Lidocaine has emerged as a useful adjuvant anesthetic agent for cases requiring intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs). A previous retrospective study suggested that lidocaine could be used as a component of propofol-based intravenous anesthesia without adversely affecting MEP or SSEP monitoring, but did not address the effect of the addition of lidocaine on the MEP and SSEP signals of individual patients.Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the intrapatient effects of the addition of lidocaine to balanced anesthesia on MEPs and SSEPs during multilevel posterior spinal fusion.Study Design
This is a prospective, two-treatment, two-period crossover randomized controlled trial with a blinded primary outcome assessment.Patient Sample
Forty patients undergoing multilevel posterior spinal fusion were studied.Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measures were MEP voltage thresholds and SSEP amplitudes. Secondary outcome measures included isoflurane concentrations and hemodynamic parameters.Methods
Each participant received two anesthetic treatments (propofol 50?mcg/kg/h and propofol 25?mcg/kg/h+lidocaine 1?mg/kg/h) along with isoflurane, ketamine, and diazepam. In this manner, each patient served as his or her own control. The order of administration of the two treatments was determined randomly.Results
There were no significant within-patient differences between MEP threshold voltages or SSEP amplitudes during the two anesthetic treatments.Conclusions
Lidocaine may be used as a component of balanced anesthesia during multilevel spinal fusions without adversely affecting the monitoring of SSEPs or MEPs in individual patients. 相似文献5.
Dustin B. Wygant Paul A. Arbisi Kevin J. Bianchini Robert L. Umlauf 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):505-510
Background Context
Waddell et al. identified a set of eight non-organic signs in 1980. There has been controversy about their meaning, particularly with respect to their use as validity indicators.Purpose
The current study examined the Waddell signs in relation to measures of somatic amplification or over-reporting in a sample of outpatient chronic pain patients. We examined the degree to which these signs were associated with measures of over-reporting.Study Design/Setting
This study examined scores on the Waddell signs in relation to over-reporting indicators in an outpatient chronic pain sample.Patient Sample
We examined 230 chronic pain patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The majority of these patients presented with primary back or spinal injuries.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures used in the study were Waddell signs, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form.Methods
We examined Waddell signs using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), receiver operating characteristic analysis, classification accuracy, and relative risk ratios.Results
Multivariate analysis of variance and ANOVA showed a significant association between Waddell signs and somatic amplification. Classification analyses showed increased odds of somatic amplification at a Waddell score of 2 or 3.Conclusions
Our results found significant evidence of an association between Waddell signs and somatic over-reporting. Elevated scores on the Waddell signs (particularly scores higher than 2 and 3) were associated with increased odds of exhibiting somatic over-reporting. 相似文献6.
7.
Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno Susanna Llido David Guede Francisco Martinez-Soriano Jose Ramon Caeiro Esther Blanco-Perez 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):431-434
Background Context
To date, no information about the cortical bone microstructural properties in atlas vertebrae with posterior arch defects has been reported.Purpose
To test if there is an increased cortical bone thickening in atlases with Type A posterior atlas arch defects in an experimental model.Study Design
Micro-computed tomography (CT) study on cadaveric atlas vertebrae.Methods
We analyzed the cortical bone thickness, the cortical volume, and the medullary volume (SkyScan 1172 Bruker micro-CT NV, Kontich, Belgium) in cadaveric dry vertebrae with a Type A atlas arch defect and normal control vertebrae.Results
The micro-CT study revealed significant differences in cortical bone thickness (p=.005), cortical volume (p=.003), and medullary volume (p=.009) values between the normal and the Type A vertebrae.Conclusions
Type A congenital atlas arch defects present a cortical bone thickening that may play a protective role against atlas fractures. 相似文献8.
Donald E. Fry Susan M. Nedza Michael Pine Agnes M. Reband Chun-Jung Huang Gregory Pine 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1641-1649
Background Context
Elective spine surgery is a commonly performed operative procedure, that requires knowledge of risk-adjusted results to improve outcomes and reduce costs.Purpose
To develop risk-adjusted models to predict the adverse outcomes (AOs) of care during the inpatient and 90-day post-discharge period for spine fusion surgery.Study Design/Setting
To identify the significant risk factors associated with AOs and to develop risk models that measure performance.Patient Sample
Hospitals that met minimum criteria of both 20 elective cervical and 20 elective non-cervical spine fusion operations in the 2012–2014 Medicare limited dataset.Outcome Measures
The risk-adjusted AOs of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay for the index hospitalization, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day post-discharge readmissions were dependent variables in predictive risk models.Methods
Over 500 candidate risk factors were used for logistic regression models to predict the AOs. Models were then used to predicted risk-adjusted AO rates by hospitals.Results
There were 874 hospitals with a minimum of both 20 cervical and 20 non-cervical spine fusion patients. There were 167,395 total cases. A total of 7,981 (15.9%) of cervical fusion patients and 17,481 (14.9%) of non-cervical fusion patients had one or more AOs for an overall AO rate of 15.2%. A total of 54 hospitals (6.2%) had z-scores that were 2.0 better than predicted with a median risk adjusted AO rate of 9.2%, and 75 hospitals (8.6%) were 2.0 z-scores poorer than predicted with a median risk-adjusted AO rate of 23.2%.Conclusions
Differences among hospitals defines opportunities for care improvement. 相似文献9.
Minji K. Lee Kathleen J. Yost Jennifer S. McDonald Ryne W. Dougherty Roanna L. Vine David F. Kallmes 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):821-829
Background Context
The majority of validation done on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been in patients with mild or moderate disability. There is paucity of research focusing on the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Purpose
To evaluate the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Study Design/Setting
Observational clinical study.Sample
The sample consisted of 214 patients with painful vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.Outcome Measures
The 23-item version of the RMDQ was completed at two time points: baseline and 30-day postintervention follow-up.Methods
With the two-parameter logistic unidimensional item response theory (IRT) analyses, we derived the range of scores that produced reliable measurement and investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).Results
Scores for 214 (100%) patients at baseline and 108 (50%) patients at follow-up did not meet the reliability criterion of 0.90 or higher, with the majority of patients having disability due to back pain that was too severe to be reliably measured by the RMDQ. Depending on methodology, MCID estimates ranged from 2 to 8 points and the proportion of patients classified as having experienced meaningful improvement ranged from 26% to 68%. A greater change in score was needed at the extreme ends of the score scale to be classified as having achieved MCID using IRT methods.Conclusions
Replacing items measuring moderate disability with items measuring severe disability could yield a version of the RMDQ that better targets patients with severe disability due to back pain. Improved precision in measuring disability would be valuable to clinicians who treat patients with greater functional impairments. Caution is needed when choosing criteria for interpreting meaningful change using the RMDQ. 相似文献10.
Martin N. Stienen Nicolas R. Smoll Holger Joswig Jan Snagowski Marco V. Corniola Karl Schaller Gerhard Hildebrandt Oliver P. Gautschi 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):807-813
Background Context
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test has recently been proposed as a simple and standardized measure for objective functional impairment (OFI) in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease (DDD).Purpose
The study aimed to explore the relationship between a patient's mental health status and both patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and TUG test results.Study Design/Setting
This is a prospective institutional review board-approved two-center study.Patient Sample
The sample was composed of 375 consecutive patients scheduled for lumbar spine surgery and a healthy cohort of 110 control subjects.Outcome Measures
Patients and control subjects were assessed with the TUG test and a comprehensive panel of subjective PROMs of pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), functional impairment (Roland-Morris Disability Index [RMDI]), Oswestry Disability Index [ODI]), as well as health-related quality of life (hrQoL; Euro-Qol [EQ]-5D).Methods
Standardized age- and sex-adjusted TUG test T-scores were calculated. The dependent variable was the short-form (SF)-12 mental component summary (MCS) quartiles, and the independent variables were the TUG T-scores and PROMs. Direct and adjusted analyses of covariance were performed to estimate the interaction between the SF-12 MCS quartiles and the independent variables.Results
In patients, there was a significant decrease in the subjective PROMs, notably the VAS back pain (p=.001) and VAS leg pain (p=.035), as well as significant increase in the RMDI (p<.001), ODI (p<.001), and the EQ-5D index (p<.001) with every increase in the quartile of the SF-12 MCS. There were no significant group differences of OFI as measured by the TUG T-scores across the SF-12 MCS quartiles (p=.462). In the healthy control group, a significant decrease in VAS leg pain (p=.028), RMDI (p=.013), and ODI (p<.001), as well as a significant increase in the EQ-5D index (p<.001), was seen across the SF-12 MCS quartiles, whereas TUG T-scores remained stable (p=.897).Conclusions
There are significant influences of mental hrQoL on subjective measures of pain, functional impairment, and hrQoL that might lead to bias when evaluating patients with lumbar DDD who suffer from reduced mental hrQoL. The TUG test appears to be a stable instrument and especially helpful in the evaluation of patients with lumbar DDD and mental health problems. 相似文献11.
Background Context
Differential alterations have been reported in the local and global cervical muscles in the presence of chronic neck pain (CNP), including the endurance alterations of these muscles. Identifying the involved muscles is crucial to the assessment and rehabilitation of patients with CNP.Purpose
To assess the relationship between clinical endurance test results, pain and disability indices, and ultrasonographic (US) measurements of the neck extensor muscles; to compare the deep and superficial cervical extensor muscle endurance and size of CNP patients with those of asymptomatic subjects and to compare the relationship between local and global extensor endurance with US measures, pain intensity, and disability.Study Design/Setting
Cross-sectional correlational analysis with a case-control design.Patient Sample
Thirty patients with CNP and 30 asymptomatic subjects participated in this study.Outcome Measures
Endurance, thickness, cross-sectional area, and shape ratio of the cervical extensor muscles (splenius capitis [SpCap], semispinalis capitis [SSCap], semispinalis cervicis [SSCer], and multifidus [MF]); pain intensity measured by the visual analog scale (VAS); neck disability index (NDI); correlation between US measures, pain intensity and NDI and extensor endurance; and correlation of US measures with pain intensity and NDI.Methods
The deep and superficial cervical extensor muscle endurance and dimensions were measured via a clinical test and by US, respectively. Participants were asked to hold the neutral chin-tuck position while lying prone. The test would be terminated if the head moved into either flexion or extension, which would yield “global” or “local” extensor muscle endurance, respectively.Results
The CNP patients showed lower global extensor endurance levels than the control participants (p<.05). The US measures of the deep extensor muscles were also smaller in the CNP group (p<.05). There were no significant correlations between extensor endurance test results and US measures in either group except for the SSCap muscle size with local and total endurance (p=.04 for both) of CNP and control participants, respectively. NDI was correlated with SpCap and SSCer muscle thicknesses in a positive and negative manner, respectively (p=.03 for both). There was also a significant correlation between MF size and VAS (p<.05).Conclusions
The findings showed higher levels of global muscle fatigability and smaller size of deep neck extensor muscles in CNP patients. Disability and extensor endurance were found to be associated with extensor muscle size. The results challenge the validity of the clinical extensor muscle endurance test in the differentiation of the deep and superficial extensor muscle endurance and the use of US in the assessment of cervical muscle endurance. Further investigations are needed to judge the superficial and deep muscle endurance in CNP patients. 相似文献12.
Nuno Rui Paulino Pereira Stein J. Janssen Kevin A. Raskin Francis J. Hornicek Marco L. Ferrone John H. Shin Jos A.M. Bramer Cornelis Nicolaas van Dijk Joseph H. Schwab 《The spine journal》2017,17(7):953-961
Background Context
Assessing quality of life, functional outcome, and pain has become important in assessing the effectiveness of treatment for metastatic spine disease. Many questionnaires are able to measure these outcomes; few are validated in patients with metastatic spine disease. As a result, there is no consensus on the ideal questionnaire to use in these patients.Purpose
Our study aim was to assess whether certain questionnaires measuring quality of life, functional outcome, and pain (1) correlated with each other, (2) measured the construct they claim to measure, (3) had good coverage—floor and ceiling effects, (4) were reliable, and (5) whether there were differences in completion time between them.Design
This is a prospective cross-sectional survey study from three outpatient clinics (two orthopedic oncology clinics and one neurosurgery clinic) from two affiliated tertiary hospital care centers.Patient Sample
We included 100 consecutive patients with metastatic spine disease between July 2014 and February 2016. We excluded non–English-speaking patients.Outcome Measures
The following questionnaires were given in random order: Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) or Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function, PROMIS Pain Intensity, EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D), and the Spine Oncology Study Group Outcome Questionnaire (SOSG-OQ).Methods
We used exploratory factor analysis—correlating questionnaires with an underlying mathematically derived trait—to assess if questionnaires measured the same concept. Coverage was assessed by floor and ceiling effects, and reliability was assessed by standard error of measurement as a function of ability. Differences in completion times were tested using the Friedman test.Results
Questionnaires measured the construct they were developed for, as demonstrated with high correlations (>0.7) with the underlying trait. A floor effect was present in the PROMIS Pain Intensity (7.0%), ODI or NDI (4.0%), and the PROMIS Physical Function (1.0%) questionnaires. A ceiling effect was present in the EQ-5D questionnaire (6.0%). The SOSG-OQ had no floor or ceiling effect. The PROMIS Physical Function and PROMIS Pain Intensity proved to be the most reliable, whereas the EQ-5D was the least reliable. Completion time differed among questionnaires (p<.001) and was shortest for the PROMIS Pain Intensity (median 24 seconds) and PROMIS Physical Function (median 42 seconds).Conclusions
In patients with metastatic spine disease, we recommend the SOSG-OQ for measuring quality of life, the PROMIS Physical Function for measuring physical function, and the PROMIS Pain Intensity for measuring pain. 相似文献13.
14.
Background Context
Acute fixed cervical kyphosis may be a rare presentation of conversion disorder, psychogenic dystonia, and potentially as a side effect from typical antipsychotic drugs. Haldol has been associated with acute dystonic reactions. In some cases, rigid deformities ensue. We are reporting a case of a fixed cervical kyphosis after the use of Haldol.Purpose
To present a case of a potential acute dystonic reaction temporally associated with Haldol ingestion leading to fixed cervical kyphosis.Study design
This is a case report.Methods
A patient diagnosed with bipolar disorder presented to the emergency room several times with severe neck pain and stiffness. The neck appeared fixed in flexion with extensive osteophyte formation over a 3-month period.Results
The patient's condition was resolved by a posterior-anterior-posterior surgical approach. It corrected the patient's cervical curvature from 88° to 5°.Conclusions
Acute dystonic reactions have the potential to apply enough pressure on bone to cause rapid osteophyte formation. 相似文献15.
Shujie Wang Yang Yang Jianguo Zhang Ye Tian Jianxiong Shen Shengru Wang 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):76-80
Background Context
Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is an essential method for preventing postoperative spinal deficits during posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) surgery for treatment of severe spine deformities, but the IOM features directing at VCR procedures are rarely reported and need to be further clarified.Purpose
To evaluate an important surgical point that will lead to the IOM loss frequently, and then remind the surgeons to pay close attention to impending monitoring changes during posterior VCR surgery.Study Design/Setting
Retrospective study.Patient Sample
A total of 77 patients with severe spine deformities who underwent posterior VCR and deformity correction surgeries from January 2012 to May 2015 are retrospectively analyzed in our spine center.Outcome Measures
IOM (motor-evoked potentials [MEP] and somatosensory-evoked potentials) was used for intraoperative spinal function assessment.Methods
Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their preoperative spinal function, including 27 patients with preoperative spinal deficits and 50 patients with spinal normal. And the IOM data during surgery, especially among VCR procedures, were mainly analyzed in the present study.Results
With the VCR procedure almost complete, most patients showed varying degrees of IOM loss that included 37 cases showing obvious IOM degenerations and 21 cases showing significant IOM loss with alerts immediately. Moreover, the patients with preoperative spinal deficits have more significant decreasing percentage in MEP amplitude (81% vs. 68%, p<.05) than those patients without.Conclusions
With the VCR procedure almost complete, surgeons must pay closely attention to the IOM signals and should be ready to take corresponding surgical measures to deal with the impeding monitoring loss. 相似文献16.
Mingxing Lei Shubin Liu Shaoxing Yang Yaosheng Liu Cheng Wang Hongjun Gao 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):814-820
Background Context
Several clinical features have been proposed for the prediction of postoperative functional outcome in patients with metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). However, few articles address the relationship between preoperative imaging characteristics and the postoperative neurologic status.Purpose
This study aims to analyze the postoperative functional outcome and to identify new imaging parameters for predicting postoperative neurologic status in patients with MESCC.Study Design
This study is a retrospective consecutive case series of patients with MESCC who were treated surgically.Patient Sample
We assessed 81 consecutive patients who were treated with decompressive surgery for MESCC between 2013 and 2015.Outcome Measures
Eight imaging characteristics were analyzed for postoperative motor status by logistic regression models. Neurologic function was assessed using the Frankel grade preoperatively and postoperatively.Methods
The following imaging characteristics were assessed for postoperative motor status: location of lesions in the spine, lamina involvement, retropulsion of the posterior wall, number of vertebrae involved, pedicle involvement, fracture of any involved vertebrae, T2 signal of the spinal cord at the compression site, and circumferential angle of spinal cord compression (CASCC).Results
The postoperative neurologic outcome was better than the preoperative neurologic status (p<.01). In the entire group, 40.7% of the patients were non-ambulatory before the surgical procedure, whereas 77.8% of the patients could walk after surgery (p=.01). In the multivariate analysis, the location of the lesions (odds ratio [OR]: 3.89, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–12.77, p=.02) and CASCC (OR: 2.31, 95% CI: 1.44–3.71, p<.01) were significantly associated with postoperative neurologic outcome. A CASCC of more than 180° was associated with an increased OR that approached significance, and the larger the CASCC, the higher the risk of poor postoperative neurologic status.Conclusions
The postoperative neurologic status was dependent on the location of spine lesions and the CASCC. Patients with upper thoracic or cervicothoracic junction spine metastases or CASCC over 180° were at higher risk of relatively poor postoperative neurologic outcome. Timely, adequate surgical decompression is urgently warranted in these patients. 相似文献17.
Sureeporn Uthaikhup Jenjira Assapun Kanokwan Watcharasaksilp Gwendolen Jull 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):46-55
Background Context
A previous study demonstrated that in seniors, the presence of cervical musculoskeletal impairment was not specific to cervicogenic headache but was present in various recurrent headache types. Physiotherapy treatment is indicated in those seniors diagnosed with cervicogenic headache but could also be adjunct treatment for those with cervical musculoskeletal signs who are suspected of having transitional headaches.Purpose
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy program for seniors with recurrent headaches associated with neck pain and cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction, irrespective of the headache classification.Study Design
This is a prospective, stratified, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment.Patient Sample
Sixty-five participants with recurrent headache, aged 50–75 years, were randomly assigned to either a physiotherapy (n=33) or a usual care group (n=32).Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity and duration, neck pain and disability, cervical range of motion, quality of life, participant satisfaction, and medication intake.Methods
Participants in the physiotherapy group received 14 treatment sessions. Participants in the usual care group continued with their usual care. Outcome measures were recorded at baseline, 11 weeks, 6 months, and 9 months. This study was funded by a government research fund of $6,850. No conflict of interest is declared.Results
There was no loss to follow-up for the primary outcome measure. Compared with usual care, participants receiving physiotherapy reported significant reductions in headache frequency immediately after treatment (mean difference ?1.6 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] ?2.5 to ?0.6), at 6-month follow-up (?1.7 days, 95% CI ?2.6 to ?0.8), and at 9-month follow-up (?2.4 days, 95% CI ?3.2 to ?1.5), and significant improvements in all secondary outcomes immediately posttreatment and at 6- and 9-month follow-ups, (p<.05 for all). No adverse events were reported.Conclusions
Physiotherapy treatment provided benefits over usual care for seniors with recurrent headache associated with neck pain and dysfunction. 相似文献18.
Douglas S. Weinberg Brian Z. Hedges Jonathan E. Belding Timothy A. Moore Heather A. Vallier 《The spine journal》2017,17(10):1449-1456
Background Context
Previous studies have suggested pulmonary complications are common among patients undergoing fixation for traumatic spine fractures. This leads to prolonged hospital stay, worse functional outcomes, and increased economic burden. However, only limited prognostic information exists regarding which patients are at greatest risk for pulmonary complications.Purpose
This study aimed to identify factors predictive of perioperative pulmonary complications in patients undergoing fixation of spine fractures.Study Design/Setting
A retrospective review in a level 1 trauma center was carried out.Patient Sample
The patient sample comprised 302 patients with spinal fractures who underwent operative fixation.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures were postoperative pulmonary complications (physiological and functional measures).Materials and Methods
Demographic and injury features were recorded, including age, gender, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, mechanism of injury, injury characteristics, and neurologic status. Treatment details, including surgery length, timing, and approach were reviewed. Postoperative pulmonary complications were recorded after a minimum of 6 months' follow-up.Results
Forty-seven pulmonary complications occurred in 42 patients (14%), including pneumonia (35), adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (10), and pulmonary embolism (2). Logistic regression found spinal cord injury (SCI) to be most predictive of pulmonary complications (odds ratio [OR]=4.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9–10.1), followed by severe chest injury (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.9), male gender (OR 2.7, 95% CI 1.1–6.8), and ASA classification (OR 2.3, 95% CI 1.4–4.0). Pulmonary complications were associated with significantly longer hospital stays (23.9 vs. 7.7 days, p<.01), stays in the intensive care unit (ICU) (19.9 vs. 3.4 days, p<.01), and increased ventilator times (13.8 days vs. 1.9 days, p<.01).Conclusions
Several factors predicted development of pulmonary complications after operative spinal fracture, including SCI, severe chest injury, male gender, and higher ASA classification. Practitioners should be especially vigilant for of postoperative complications and associated injuries following upper-thoracic spine fractures. Future study must focus on appropriate interventions necessary for reducing complications in these high-risk patients. 相似文献19.
20.
Hiroyuki Aono Keisuke Ishii Hidekazu Tobimatsu Yukitaka Nagamoto Shota Takenaka Masayuki Furuya Horii Chiaki Motoki Iwasaki 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1113-1119