Study of istradefylline in patients with Parkinson's disease on levodopa with motor fluctuations

The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of istradefylline 20 mg once daily versus placebo as an adjunct to levodopa in subjects with Parkinson's disease (PD) who have motor fluctuations. Istradefylline (KW‐6002) is an adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist that in primate models of PD improves motor function without causing or worsening dyskinesia. This 12‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, randomized, Phase 3 study of istradefylline was conducted in subjects experiencing an average daily OFF time of at least 3 hours (116 randomized to istradefylline; 115 to placebo). All were on stable levodopa regimens; 90% were also on stable regimens of other anti‐Parkinson's medications. Istradefylline‐treated subjects had significant placebo‐corrected reductions in daily OFF time from baseline to endpoint: 4.6% (P = 0.03) and 0.7 hours (P = 0.03). For ON time with troublesome dyskinesia, the changes between istradefylline and placebo were not significant. Istradefylline was well tolerated, with 6 (5.2%) istradefylline‐treated and 7 (6.1%) placebo‐treated subjects withdrawing from the study because of adverse events. Dyskinesia, lightheadedness, tremor, constipation, and weight decrease were reported more often with istradefylline than placebo. We conclude that istradefylline is well tolerated and significantly reduces OFF time as an adjunct to levodopa in PD subjects with motor fluctuations. © 2008 Movement Disorder Society     

Istradefylline,an adenosine A2A receptor antagonist,for patients with Parkinson's Disease: A meta-analysis

ObjectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of istradefylline as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's Disease (PD).MethodsIn this study, we searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, China Academic Journal Full-text Database (CNKI), China Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and Wanfang Database. The quality of included studies was strictly evaluated. Data analyses were performed by the Cochrane Collaboration's RevMan5.0 software.ResultsFive randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The result showed a significant reduction of the awake time per day spent in the OFF state and improvement of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III in the ON state when receiving istradefylline compared with patients receiving placebo. There was no significant difference between the istradefylline 20 mg and the istradefylline 40 mg groups in the UPDRS Part III in the ON state (WMD = 1.27, 95% CI [? 0.40, 2.95]). The results showed significant differences in dyskinesia (RR = 1.63, 95% CI [1.16, 2.29]) compared to istradefylline 40 mg with placebo. There was no significant statistical difference with regard to other adverse events.ConclusionsThe present study showed that istradefylline is safe and effective as an adjunct to levodopa in patients with PD. Future large-scale, higher-quality, long-treatment, and placebo-controlled trials are needed.     

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline 20 versus 40 mg/day as augmentation for Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis

Abstract

Background:

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline 20 mg/day has been approved this year for manufacturing and market in Japan. Therefore, we did this meta-analysis to systematically evaluate the clinical applicability of 40 mg/day as augmentation to levodopa in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).

Method:

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) that compared istradefylline with placebo for short-course treatment of PD in adults were systematically reviewed up to November 2013. Outcome measurements were daily off time and unified Parkinson's disease rating scale (UPDRS) Part III score (on state). Random-effect model was used.

Result:

Data were obtained from four RCTs. In these RCTs, 405 patients received istradefylline 20 mg/day and 420 patients received 40 mg/day. The pooled weighted mean difference was 0·17 with 95% confidence interval (CI) = [?0·23, 0·56] on daily off time and 0·70 with 95% CI = [?0·89, 2·29] on UPDRS Part III score (on state). The adverse events analysis showed that 20 and 40 mg/day had comparable acceptability. Heterogeneity was not existed.

Conclusion:

These results indicate that istradefylline 40 mg/day as augmentation shows potential promise on clinical applicability, and is worthy of further study. Limited by the number of included RCTs, future studies are needed to verify and support this conclusion, and assess the long-term effect of istradefylline, the effect of istradefylline as monotherapy and other dose of istradefylline.     

Istradefylline for Parkinson's disease patients experiencing motor fluctuations: results of the KW-6002-US-018 study

BackgroundIstradefylline (KW-6002) is a selective adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist investigated as adjunctive therapy to levodopa in PD patients with motor response complications. In Phase 2b/3 studies, Istradefylline reduced OFF time without worsening troublesome dyskinesia and was well tolerated.MethodsA randomized, 12-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study evaluated the efficacy of 10, 20, and 40 mg/day of Istradefylline in patients on levodopa therapy with motor response complications. The primary outcome measure was change from baseline to endpoint in the percentage of awake time/day spent in the OFF state as determined by patient diary.ResultsSix hundred and ten patients were randomized. Five hundred and eighty four patients were included in the Intent-to-treat (ITT) group—146 placebo patients and 149 in the 10 mg, 144 in the 20, and 145 patients in the 40 mg Istradefylline groups. Baseline demographics were similar between groups. Treatment cohorts had been diagnosed an average of 9 years diagnosis and 3.6 years from the onset of motor fluctuations; at baseline they had an average of 6.7 h of OFF time and an average UPDRS motor score of 22 when ON. At endpoint, the amount and percentage of OFF time did not differ between Istradefylline and placebo, however a dose-ordering response was observed. Changes from baseline in the UPDRS motor score in the on state for the 40 mg were modest but significant compared to placebo (2.9 vs. 0.8; p < 0.05).ConclusionsAlthough Istradefylline did not impact OFF time duration, it significantly improved motor score at 40 mg/day.     

Two‐year,randomized, controlled study of safinamide as add‐on to levodopa in mid to late Parkinson's disease

In a 6‐month double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study of Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations, safinamide 50 and 100 mg/d significantly increased ON‐time without increasing dyskinesia. Further long‐term safinamide use in these patients was evaluated over an additional 18 months. Patients continued on their randomized placebo, 50, or 100 mg/d safinamide. The primary endpoint was change in Dyskinesia Rating Scale total score during ON‐time over 24 months. Other efficacy endpoints included change in ON‐time without troublesome dyskinesia, changes in individual diary categories, depressive symptoms, and quality of life measures. Change in Dyskinesia Rating Scale was not significantly different in safinamide versus placebo groups, despite decreased mean total Dyskinesia Rating Scale with safinamide compared with an almost unchanged score in placebo. Ad hoc subgroup analysis of moderate to severe dyskinetic patients at baseline (36% of patients) showed a decrease with safinamide 100 mg/d compared with placebo (P = 0.0317). Improvements in motor function, activities of daily living, depressive symptoms, clinical status, and quality of life at 6 months remained significant at 24 months. Adverse events and discontinuation rates were similar with safinamide and placebo. This 2‐year, controlled study of add‐on safinamide in mid‐to‐late Parkinson's disease with motor fluctuations, although not demonstrating an overall difference in dyskinesias between patients and controls, showed improvement in dyskinesia in patients at least moderately dyskinetic at baseline. The study additionally demonstrated significant clinical benefits in ON‐time (without troublesome dyskinesia), OFF‐time, activities of daily living, motor symptoms, quality of life, and symptoms of depression. © 2014 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society     

Pardoprunox as adjunct therapy to levodopa in patients with Parkinson's disease experiencing motor fluctuations: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, trial

AimsTo determine the efficacy and safety of pardoprunox in levodopa-treated patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experiencing motor fluctuations.MethodsPatients were randomized to pardoprunox (up to 42 mg/day, n = 150) or placebo (n = 144). Pardoprunox was titrated to an optimal dose over 7 weeks, followed by a 12-week stable dose period. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline to study endpoint in total daily OFF time, based on patient diaries. Secondary analyses included the change in ON time without troublesome dyskinesias, UPDRS-ADL + Motor ON, UPDRS-ADL OFF and PDQ-39. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of pardoprunox on dyskinesias (UPDRS items 32 + 33), depression (Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale) and pain (Visual Analogue Scale).ResultsPardoprunox significantly reduced OFF time versus placebo (?1.62 h/day versus ?0.92 h/day, respectively, p = 0.0215). Compared to placebo, pardoprunox improved ON time without troublesome dyskinesias (p = 0.0386), UPDRS-ADL + Motor ON (p = 0.0003), and UPDRS-ADL OFF (p < 0.0001), while no significant difference was observed on PDQ-39. A high drop-out rate due to adverse events (AEs) (pardoprunox, 37%; placebo, 12%) suggested that the selected dose range may have been too high, and/or titration was too rapid.ConclusionsPardoprunox decreased OFF time and increased ON time without troublesome dyskinesias in levodopa-treated PD patients. The high drop-out rate at the selected doses justifies the investigation of lower doses. The impact of pardoprunox on dyskinesias and non-motor symptoms deserves further investigation.     

Orodispersible sublingual piribedil to abort OFF episodes: A single dose placebo‐controlled,randomized, double‐blind,cross‐over study

S90049, a novel sublingual formulation of the non‐ergoline D₂‐D₃ agonist piribedil, has a pharmacokinetic profile promising to provide rapid relief on motor signs in Parkinson's disease (PD). We assessed the efficacy and safety of S90049 in aborting OFF episodes responding to subcutaneous apomorphine in PD patients with motor fluctuations. This was a single‐dose double‐blind double‐placebo 3 × 3 cross‐over study. Optimal tested doses were determined during a previous open‐label titration phase (S90049 median dose: 60 mg, apomorphine: 5 mg). Primary endpoint was the maximal change versus baseline in UPDRS motor score (ΔUPDRS III) assessed after drug administration following an overnight withdrawal of antiparkinsonian medications. Thirty patients (age: 60 ± 8 years, PD duration: 12 ± 6 years, UPDRS III OFF: 37 ± 15) participated. S90049 wassuperior to placebo on ΔUPDRS III (?13 ± 12 versus ?7 ± 9 respectively; estimated difference ?5.2, 95% Confidence Interval (CI)[?10.4;0.05], P = 0.05). This was also true for secondary outcomes: number of patients switching from OFF to ON (17 on S90049 vs. 8 on placebo, P = 0.03), time to turn ON (P = 0.013) and duration of the ON phase (P = 0.03). In the 17 patients who switched ON on S90049, ΔUPDRS III was similar on S90049 (?21.2 ± 10.1) and apomorphine (?23.6 ± 14.1) (estimated difference: 4.0 95% CI [?2.9;10.9]). S90049 was well tolerated: no serious or unexpected adverse event occurred. A single dose of up to 60 mg of S90049 given sublingually was superior to placebo in improving UPDRS III and aborting a practical OFF in patients with advanced PD. Testing greater doses might improve response rate. © 2009 Movement Disorder Society     

Adenosine A2A receptor antagonist istradefylline (KW-6002) reduces "off" time in Parkinson's disease: a double-blind, randomized, multicenter clinical trial (6002-US-005)

Objective

Based on new understanding of nondopaminergic pathways involved in Parkinson's disease (PD) pathophysiology, a selective adenosine A_2A receptor antagonist, istradefylline, shows promise for the treatment of PD.

Methods

Istradefylline (40mg/day) was studied in levodopa‐treated PD subjects experiencing prominent wearing‐off motor fluctuations. At 23 North American sites, 196 subjects were randomized in a double‐blind, 12‐week outpatient clinical trial of istradefylline (114 completing the trial) or placebo (58 completing the trial). The primary efficacy measure was change from baseline to end point in the percentage of daily awake “off” time, recorded by subjects using a patient PD diary. Secondary end points evaluated “on” time (including “on time with dyskinesia”), the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, and a Clinical Global Impression–Improvement of Illness score. Clinical laboratory, electrocardiograms, vital signs, and adverse event monitoring comprised the safety monitoring.

Results

After randomization, approximately 88% of subjects completed the double‐blind period. Compared with baseline, the decrease of daily awake “off” time for istradefylline was a mean (± standard deviation) of ?10.8 ± 16.6% (95% confidence interval, ?13.46 to ?7.52) and for placebo, ?4.0 ± 15.7% (95% confidence interval, ?7.73–0.31; p = 0.007 using two‐way analysis of variance). This effect corresponded to changes from baseline in total daily awake “off” time of ?1.8 ± 2.8 hours for istradefylline and ?0.6 ± 2.7 hours for placebo (p = 0.005). Treatment‐emergent adverse effects with istradefylline were generally mild.

Interpretation

Istradefylline was safe, well tolerated, and offered a clinically meaningful reduction in “off” time without increased troublesome dyskinesia. Ann Neurol 2008

     

A randomized,double‐blind,placebo‐controlled trial of camicinal in Parkinson's disease

Background : Delayed gastric emptying may impair l ‐dopa absorption, contributing to motor fluctuations. We evaluated the effect of camicinal (GSK962040), a gastroprokinetic, on the absorption of l ‐dopa and symptoms of PD. Methods : Phase II, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive camicinal 50 mg once‐daily (n = 38) or placebo (n = 20) for 7 to 9 days. Results: l ‐dopa exposure was similar with coadministration of camicinal compared to placebo. Median time to maximum l ‐dopa concentration was reduced, indicating more rapid absorption of l ‐dopa. Camicinal resulted in significant reduction in OFF time (–2.31 hours; 95% confidence interval: –3.71, –0.90), significant increase in ON time (+1.88 hours; 95% confidence interval: 0.28, 3.48) per day, and significant decrease in mean total MDS‐UPDRS score (–12.5; 95% confidence interval: –19.67, ‐5.29). Camicinal treatment was generally well tolerated. Conclusions : PD symptom improvement with camicinal occurred in parallel with more rapid absorption of l ‐dopa. This study provides evidence of an improvement of the motor response to l ‐dopa in people with PD treated with camicinal 50 mg once‐daily compared with placebo, which will require further evaluation. © 2017 The Authors. Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.     

Entacapone is beneficial in both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients with Parkinson's disease: a randomised,placebo controlled,double blind,six month study

OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of entacapone, a specific peripherally acting catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) inhibitor used in combination with levodopa treatment, in cases of Parkinson's disease with both fluctuating and non-fluctuating response to treatment. METHODS: A randomised, placebo controlled, double blind, six month study was undertaken in 172 fluctuating and 128 non-fluctuating patients. The clinical efficacy and safety of 200 mg entacapone given with each daily levodopa dose was studied. Efficacy was examined using home diaries, the unified Parkinson disease rating scale (UPDRS), and recording of daily levodopa dose. RESULTS: The primary efficacy variable for fluctuating patients-the proportion of daily ON time-showed a significant increase compared with placebo (p < 0.05). The absolute ON time (mean (SD)) increased from 9.5 (2.5) to 10.8 (2.4) hours (p < 0.01), and the daily OFF time was correspondingly reduced from 7.0 (2.6) to 5.9 (2.5) hours (p < 0.05 v placebo). This improvement was achieved despite a reduction in daily levodopa requirements. The effect was rapidly lost on withdrawal of entacapone. In non-fluctuating patients, the primary efficacy measure was part II of the UPDRS (activities of daily living; ADL). In this group of patients, ADL scores improved in the entacapone group (p < 0.01 v placebo), and there was also a 40 mg reduction in levodopa requirement (p < 0.01 v placebo). Entacapone was well tolerated by both fluctuating and non-fluctuating patients. CONCLUSIONS: The ability of entacapone to provide additional benefits to levodopa treatment in increasing ON time in fluctuating Parkinson's disease patients was confirmed. A novel finding was that patients without fluctuations also obtained benefit from the addition of entacapone to their levodopa treatment, as evidenced by improved ADL scores and a relatively reduced levodopa requirement.     

Ataluren treatment of patients with nonsense mutation dystrophinopathy

Introduction: Dystrophinopathy is a rare, severe muscle disorder, and nonsense mutations are found in 13% of cases. Ataluren was developed to enable ribosomal readthrough of premature stop codons in nonsense mutation (nm) genetic disorders. Methods: Randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled study; males ≥5 years with nm‐dystrophinopathy received study drug orally 3 times daily, ataluren 10, 10, 20 mg/kg (N = 57); ataluren 20, 20, 40 mg/kg (N = 60); or placebo (N = 57) for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in 6‐Minute Walk Distance (6MWD) at Week 48. Results: Ataluren was generally well tolerated. The primary endpoint favored ataluren 10, 10, 20 mg/kg versus placebo; the week 48 6MWD Δ = 31.3 meters, post hoc P = 0.056. Secondary endpoints (timed function tests) showed meaningful differences between ataluren 10, 10, 20 mg/kg, and placebo. Conclusions: As the first investigational new drug targeting the underlying cause of nm‐dystrophinopathy, ataluren offers promise as a treatment for this orphan genetic disorder with high unmet medical need. Muscle Nerve 50 : 477–487, 2014     

Rasagiline adjunct therapy in patients with Parkinson's disease: Post hoc analyses of the PRESTO and LARGO trials

BackgroundRasagiline was safe and effective when used as adjunct therapy with levodopa in patients with moderate-to-advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) in the phase III PRESTO and LARGO studies.ObjectiveTo assess clinical effects of rasagiline 1 mg/day on cardinal PD symptoms and motor fluctuations in defined patient subgroups using pooled data from PRESTO and LARGO.MethodsBoth double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled studies included PD patients with motor fluctuations despite optimized therapy with levodopa, with or without concomitant dopamine agonists (DA) or catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibitor (COMT-I) treatment. These post hoc analyses measured effects of rasagiline 1 mg vs placebo on individual cardinal PD symptoms during ON time and mean change from baseline in daily OFF time in subgroups of patients who at baseline were receiving only levodopa, were considered “mild fluctuators” (daily OFF time ≤ 4 h), and who were or were not receiving concomitant DA or COMT-I therapy.ResultsCompared with placebo, rasagiline significantly improved all cardinal PD symptoms and significantly reduced adjusted mean daily OFF time when used as first adjunct therapy in levodopa-treated patients and in patients with mild motor fluctuations. Significant improvement in motor fluctuations was reported with rasagiline regardless of concomitant DA or COMT-I use. Overall incidence of dopaminergic adverse events did not increase with concomitant DA or COMT-I use.ConclusionRasagiline was an effective first adjunct therapy in levodopa-treated patients; benefited patients with signs of early “wearing off”; improved all cardinal PD symptoms; and further improved symptoms in patients already receiving other adjunctive dopaminergic treatment.     

Fixed-dose trial of the single isomer SSRI escitalopram in depressed outpatients

BACKGROUND: Escitalopram is the single isomer responsible for the serotonin reuptake inhibition produced by the racemic antidepressant citalopram. The present randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, fixed-dose multicenter trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder. METHOD: Outpatients with an ongoing DSM-IV major depressive episode (N = 491) were randomly assigned to placebo, escitalopram, 10 mg/day, escitalopram, 20 mg/day, or citalopram, 40 mg/day, and entered an 8-week double-blind treatment period following a 1-week single-blind placebo lead-in. Clinical response was evaluated by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scales, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A), and patient-rated quality-of-life scales. RESULTS: Escitalopram, at both doses, produced significant improvement at study endpoint relative to placebo on all measures of depression; significant separation of escitalopram from placebo was observed within I week of double-blind treatment. Citalopram treatment also significantly improved depressive symptomatology compared with placebo; however, escitalopram, 10 mg/day, was at least as effective as citalopram, 40 mg/day, at endpoint. Anxiety symptoms and quality of life were also significantly improved by escitalopram compared with placebo. The incidence of discontinuations due to adverse events for the escitalopram 10 mg/day group was not different from the placebo group (4.2% vs. 2.5%; p = .50), and not different for the escitalopram 20 mg/day group and the citalopram 40 mg/day group (10.4% vs. 8.8%; p = .83). CONCLUSION: Escitalopram, a single isomer SSRI, is well-tolerated and has demonstrated antidepressant efficacy at a dose of 10 mg/day.     

Efficacy,safety and tolerability of rasagiline as adjunctive therapy in elderly patients with Parkinson’s disease

Background: Rasagiline, an MAO‐B inhibitor, is indicated for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease (PD). In this post hoc analysis, the efficacy, safety and tolerability of rasagiline as an adjunct to levodopa were compared with placebo in elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years) patients with PD. Methods: Data were pooled from the Parkinson’s Rasagiline: Efficacy and Safety on the Treatment of ‘OFF’ and Lasting effect in Adjunct therapy with Rasagiline Given Once daily randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trials with the primary efficacy end‐point being the reduction from baseline in daily OFF time. Secondary efficacy end‐points included scores for Clinical Global Improvement (CGI)‐Examiner during ON time, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS)‐ADL during OFF time, UPDRS‐Motor during ON time and total daily ON time with and without troublesome dyskinesia. Tolerability was evaluated from adverse events (AEs) in the two age groups. Results: Rasagiline decreased daily OFF time versus placebo (P < 0.01) and improved CGI‐Examiner score (P = 0.001) and UPDRS‐Motor ON score (P < 0.05). Changes in UPDRS‐ADL OFF score and total daily ON time without dyskinesia also favoured rasagiline but were not significant. Between‐group comparisons (≥70 vs. <70 years) showed that efficacy was unaffected by age for all end‐points (P > 0.1), and rasagiline was well tolerated amongst both groups of patients with a comparable incidence of total and dopaminergic AEs (P > 0.1). Conclusions: Adjunct rasagiline is efficacious and well tolerated in elderly non‐demented patients (≥70 years) with moderate to advanced PD. Confirmation of the efficacy and safety of rasagiline in the elderly patient subgroup is especially relevant because of the increasing number of elderly patients with PD.     

Sexual functioning assessed in 4 double-blind placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trials of duloxetine for major depressive disorder

OBJECTIVE: The onset or worsening of sexual dysfunction is a common treatment-emergent side effect of antidepressant medications. Post hoc analyses of pooled data from placebo-controlled studies were utilized to assess sexual functioning in patients receiving duloxetine or paroxetine. METHOD: Acute-phase data were obtained from four 8-week, double-blind, placebo- and paroxetine-controlled trials of similar design in which patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to receive placebo (N = 371), duloxetine (40-120 mg/day; N = 736), or paroxetine (20 mg/day; N = 359). Pooling of data from these studies was anticipated during study design. This represented all available data from duloxetine studies in which the Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) was administered both at baseline and endpoint. Long-term data were available from extension phases in 2 of these trials in which acute treatment responders received placebo (N = 129), duloxetine (80-120 mg/day; N = 297), or paroxetine (20 mg/day; N = 140) for an additional 26 weeks. Data were collected between March 2000 and July 2002. RESULTS: The incidence of acute treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction was significantly lower among duloxetine-treated patients compared with those receiving paroxetine (p = .015), although both rates were significantly higher than placebo (p = .007 and p < .001 for duloxetine and paroxetine, respectively). Treatment group differences in the incidence of treatment-emergent dysfunction did not vary significantly by gender. In female patients, acute treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction was significantly lower in the duloxetine treatment group compared with the paroxetine treatment group (p = .032), with both rates being significantly higher than placebo (p = .049 and p < .001 for duloxetine and paroxetine, respectively). In the somewhat smaller group of male patients, acute treatment-emergent dysfunction did not differ significantly between duloxetine and placebo treatment groups, but the incidence was significantly higher in paroxetine-treated male patients compared with male placebo patients (p = .012). The long-term incidence of treatment-emergent dysfunction did not differ significantly between duloxetine-, paroxetine-, and placebo-treated patients. CONCLUSION: In this analysis of pooled data, patients receiving duloxetine (40-120 mg/day) or paroxetine (20 mg/day) had a significantly higher incidence of acute treatment-emergent sexual dysfunction when compared with placebo patients. However, the incidence of acute treatment-emergent dysfunction for duloxetine was significantly lower than that observed for paroxetine.     

Aripiprazole for the treatment of pediatric bipolar I disorder: a 30‐week,randomized, placebo‐controlled study

Objective: To evaluate the long‐term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of aripiprazole in pediatric subjects with bipolar I disorder. Methods: A randomized, double‐blind, 30‐week, placebo‐controlled study of aripiprazole (10 or 30 mg/day) in youths (10–17 years) with bipolar I disorder (manic or mixed) ± psychotic features (n = 296) was performed. After four weeks, acute treatment completers continued receiving ≤26 weeks of double‐blind treatment (n = 210). The primary outcome was Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) total score change. Results: Of the 210 subjects who entered the 26‐week extension phase, 32.4% completed the study (45.3% for aripiprazole 10 mg/day, 31.0% for aripiprazole 30 mg/day, and 18.8% for placebo). Both aripiprazole doses demonstrated significantly (p < 0.001) greater improvements in YMRS total score at endpoint compared with placebo in protocol‐specified last observation carried forward analyses, but not in observed case or mixed‐model repeated measures at week 30. Overall time to all‐cause discontinuation was longer for aripiprazole 10 mg/day (15.6 weeks) and aripiprazole 30 mg/day (9.5 weeks) compared with placebo (5.3 weeks; both p < 0.05 versus placebo). Both aripiprazole doses were significantly superior to placebo regarding response rates, Children’s Global Assessment of Functioning and Clinical Global Impressions‐Bipolar severity of overall and mania scores at endpoint in all analyses. Commonly reported adverse events included headache, somnolence, and extrapyramidal disorder. Conclusions: Aripiprazole 10 mg/day and 30 mg/day were superior to placebo and generally well tolerated in pediatric subjects with bipolar I disorder up to 30 weeks. Despite the benefits of treatment, completion rates were low in all treatment arms.     

Istradefylline as monotherapy for Parkinson disease: Results of the 6002-US-051 trial

Objective6002-US-051 was a 12-week, double-blind study evaluating the safety and efficacy of istradefylline, a selective A_2A adenosine receptor antagonist, as monotherapy in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).MethodsPatients with Hoehn–Yahr stages 1–2.5 who had not received dopaminergic drugs in the past 30 days or levodopa for >30 days at anytime were randomized to 40 mg/day istradefylline or placebo. The primary efficacy outcome was the change from Baseline to Endpoint in the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Subscale III score. Safety was assessed by physical examination, laboratory tests, electrocardiograms, and adverse event monitoring.Results176 patients comprised the intent-to-treat population. Although istradefylline showed numerically greater improvements in UPDRS Subscale III at each time point and reached statistical significance at Week 2 (LS mean difference = −1.47), it did not show statistically significant improvement from placebo for the primary endpoint (least square [LS] mean difference = −1.11). Similar proportions of patients in each group experienced treatment-emergent adverse events (63% istradefylline, 65% placebo).ConclusionsIstradefylline, as monotherapy in patients with PD, is safe and well tolerated. However, efficacy in improving motor symptoms in early PD was not statistically demonstrated by this study.     

Effect of rasagiline as adjunct therapy to levodopa on severity of OFF in Parkinson's disease

Background: The LARGO study demonstrated that rasagiline 1 mg/day as adjunct to levodopa significantly reduces OFF time to the same magnitude as adjunct entacapone. This substudy of LARGO aimed to assess the effect of rasagiline and entacapone on the motor symptoms of PD during the practically defined OFF state. Methods: LARGO was a randomized, double‐blind, multicenter trial that assessed the efficacy and safety of rasagiline (1 mg/day), entacapone (200 mg with each levodopa dose), and placebo in 687 levodopa‐treated PD patients with motor fluctuations. A substudy of LARGO measured UPDRS motor scores in the practically defined OFF state in 32 rasagiline, 36 entacapone, and 37 placebo patients. Results: Treatment with rasagiline produced a significant improvement over placebo of 5.64 units in UPDRS motor OFF score (P = 0.013 vs. placebo). By contrast, the effect of adjunct entacapone was not significant (P = 0.14 vs. placebo). Whereas rasagiline also showed a trend in reducing the UPDRS‐ADL OFF score (P = 0.058 vs. placebo), no such trend was noted for entacapone (P = 0.26 vs. placebo). Retrospective analysis, using the Bonferroni correction, of UPDRS motor subdomains further revealed that rasagiline, but not entacapone, significantly improved bradykinesia (P < 0.001) and showed trends for improvements in facial expression, speech, and axial impairment during OFF time. Conclusions: This study provides the first objectively measured evidence that adjunct rasagiline 1 mg/day is effective in reducing the severity of motor symptoms in the OFF state. This suggests a continuous effect of rasagiline 1 mg/day throughout the day and night and is consistent with its extended duration of therapeutic action.     

Early treatment benefits of ropinirole prolonged release in Parkinson's disease patients with motor fluctuations

We performed a retrospective analysis of the Efficacy And Safety Evaluation in Parkinson's Disease (EASE‐PD) Adjunct Study, assessing the minimum time to symptom improvement after initiation of ropinirole prolonged release (2–24 mg/day) versus placebo in patients with moderate‐to‐advanced PD not optimally controlled with levodopa. Ropinirole prolonged release was superior to placebo at Week 2 for change from baseline in “off” time (adjusted mean treatment difference [AMTD] – 0.7 hours; 95% confidence interval [CI], –1.1, –0.2; P = 0.0029), and “on” time without troublesome dyskinesia (0.4 hours; 95%CI, 0.01, 0.88; P = 0.0444). At Week 4, improvements were seen in change from baseline in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale total motor score (AMTD, –3.1; 95%CI, –4.4, –1.8; P < 0.0001), activities of daily living score (AMTD, –1.1; 95%CI, –1.7, –0.5; P = 0.0004), and the cardinal symptoms of PD compared with placebo. These analyses indicate that once‐daily, adjunctive ropinirole prolonged release can offer PD symptom control 2 weeks after treatment initiation. © 2010 Movement Disorder Society     

Duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder: a closer look at efficacy and safety data across the approved dose range

OBJECTIVE: This analysis focuses on efficacy and safety data obtained from studies of duloxetine for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) within the approved dose range of 40-60 mg/day. METHOD: Efficacy and safety data were obtained from the acute phase portions of four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials in patients meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDD. In Studies 1 and 2, patients were randomized to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) (n=123 [Study 1]; n=128 [Study 2]) or placebo (n=122 [Study 1]; n=139 [Study 2]) for 9 weeks. In Studies 3 and 4, patients were randomized to duloxetine 20 mg twice daily (BID) (n=91 [Study 3]; n=86 [Study 4]) or placebo (n=90 [Study 3]; n=89 [Study 4]) for 8 weeks. Efficacy measures included the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD17) total score (primary outcome), HAMD17 subscales, the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) and Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) scales, and Visual Analog Scales (VAS) for pain. Safety assessments included rates of discontinuation due to adverse events, spontaneously reported treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital signs. RESULTS: In both studies of duloxetine 60 mg QD, mean change in HAMD17 total score was significantly greater in duloxetine-treated patients compared with placebo (Study 1, p<.001; Study 2, p=.024). At a dose of 20 mg BID, duloxetine demonstrated significant superiority over placebo on the HAMD17 total score in one of the two studies (Study 4, p=.034). Probabilities of remission among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD were 44.2% in Study 1 (p<.001 vs. placebo) and 43.0% in Study 2 (NS), while for patients receiving duloxetine 20 mg BID the probabilities of remission were 27.2% in Study 3 (NS) and 36.1% in Study 4 (NS). Across the six assessed VAS measures of pain severity and interference, the main effect of treatment for duloxetine 60 mg QD was significantly superior to placebo on 7 of the 12 outcomes in Studies 1 and 2, while duloxetine 20 mg BID was not superior to placebo on any of the 12 outcomes in Studies 3 and 4. The rate of discontinuation due to adverse events was 13.1% among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD, and 11.9% at a dose of 20 mg BID. The most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse events at both doses included nausea, headache, dry mouth, dizziness, and insomnia. The incidence of treatment-emergent nausea among patients receiving duloxetine 60 mg QD was 37.8%, compared with 16.4% among patients receiving 20 mg BID. CONCLUSION: Duloxetine provides safe and effective acute phase treatment of MDD at doses of 40-60 mg/day. Compared with placebo, the 60 mg QD dose was more consistently effective than the 20 mg BID dose. However, the incidence of certain treatment-emergent adverse events is likely to be lower at the 40 mg dose.