SIEA flap leads to an increase in abdominal seroma rates compared to DIEP flap for breast reconstruction

In this study, we evaluated the peri-operative abdominal drain volumes and length of hospital admission between our superficial inferior epigastric artery (SIEA) and deep inferior epigastric artery perforator (DIEP) patients to determine whether SIEA flaps were associated with increased post-operative abdominal drainage and length of hospital stay. We studied consecutive patients who had breast reconstruction using either a free SIEA (seven) or DIEP (28) flaps. All patients had abdominal drains inserted, and cumulative drainage measurements were taken every 24 h. Data on patient's age, BMI, length of hospital stay, smoking history, and abdominal fluid drainage were collected. Statistical analyses were performed using a t test (Mann–Whitney). A statistically significant difference (P = 0.029) was observed in the total abdominal drainage between the two groups. The mean drainage volume in the SIEA group was 2,248 ml and 531 ml in the DIEP group. No association was observed between smoking and drainage volume in the DIEP group. Similarly, obesity did not appear to influence drainage volumes in either the SIEA or the DIEP groups. The average length of stay for the SIEA group was 10.4 days and 9.1 days in the DIEP group, although this was not statistically significant (P = 0.351). While abdominal wall morbidity is reduced in patients undergoing an SIEA flap for breast reconstruction, in our series, we found that the SIEA flap was associated with a significant increase in abdominal drain volume relative to the DIEP flap, which translated to an extra day in hospital.     

Tips and tricks for DIEP flap breast reconstruction in patients with previous abdominal scar

The aim of this study was to analyze outcomes of patients who had prior abdominal operations and underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction and to describe technical strategies to insure well‐vascularized flap‐harvest minimizing abdominal donor‐site complications. All patients who underwent DIEP flap breast reconstruction between 2004 and 2014 were reviewed and divided into a control group (CG) and a scar group (SG). Patient demographics, operative details, flap and donor‐site complications were analyzed and compared. For all of the scars, DIEP flap design was not modified, but a standardized approach was developed according to the type and location of the scar, available vascular pedicle, perforator locations, and the required flap tissue for breast reconstruction. Two hundred and eighty patients underwent 292 flaps in CG and 107 underwent 111 flaps in SG. Pfannenstiel, McBurney, laparoscopic, midline and subcostal were the most common previous incisions. There were no significant differences between groups regarding demographics, flap and mastectomy weight, active smoking, or radiation status (P > 0.05). No significant differences were observed in DIEP flap loss (P = 0.909), partial flap loss (P=0.799), or fat necrosis (P=0.871) and in the rate of abdominal donor‐site complications between groups (P > 0.05). SG had a significantly higher mean operative time than CG (P=0.034). Medial raw was a negative risk‐factor for flap complications, while BMI (>25.1 kg/m²) and smoking‐history were significant predictors for donor‐site complications. With careful preoperative planning and appropriate technical strategies, successfully DIEP flap breast reconstruction can be performed without increased flap and donor‐site complications in patients with preexisting abdominal scars. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 37:282–292, 2017.     

A new classification system for muscle and nerve preservation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

The main advantage of deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction is muscle preservation. Perforating vessels, however, display anatomic variability and intraoperative decisions must balance flap perfusion with muscle or nerve sacrifice. Studies that aggregate DIEP flap reconstruction may not accurately reflect the degree of rectus preservation. At Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center from 2004–2009, 446 DIEP flaps were performed for breast reconstruction. Flaps were divided into three categories: DIEP‐1, no muscle or nerve sacrifice (126 flaps); DIEP‐2, segmental nerve sacrifice and minimal muscle sacrifice (244 flaps); DIEP‐3, perforator harvest from both the medial and lateral row, segmental nerve sacrifice and central muscle sacrifice (76 flaps). Although the rate of abdominal bulge was similar among groups, fat necrosis was significantly higher in DIEP‐1 when compared with DIEP‐3 flaps (19.8% vs. 9.2%, P = 0.049). We describe a DIEP flap classification system and operative techniques to minimize muscle and nerve sacrifice. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc. Microsurgery, 2010.     

A retrospective comparison of abdominal muscle strength following breast reconstruction with a free TRAM or DIEP flap.

Abdominal weakness is a known potential complication of breast reconstruction with a pedicled or free TRAM flap. It has been presumed that the DIEP flap, which involves no muscle resection, does not compromise abdominal muscle strength but little objective research exists to substantiate this. The aims of this retrospective study were to compare abdominal muscle strength following free TRAM flap and DIEP flap, to compare both groups with a control group and to establish the effect of both procedures on functional activities. Fifty women (23 with a DIEP flap, 27 with a free TRAM flap) plus 32 non-operated controls underwent assessment of their abdominal and back extensor muscle strength on a KIN COM isokinetic dynamometer. Two questionnaires were used to establish the impact on function. The TRAM flap group had significant weakness of the abdominal and back extensor muscles compared with the DIEP flap group and the control group. The trend was for the DIEP flap group to have weaker abdominal muscles than the control group. There was a higher level of abdominal pain and a greater number of reported functional difficulties in the TRAM flap group than in the DIEP flap group.This study demonstrates that whilst the DIEP flap can reduce the strength deficit caused by the free TRAM flap, abdominal weakness can still result from the DIEP flap. A randomised controlled trial is currently underway to investigate the effect of preoperative abdominal exercises in preventing/minimising postoperative abdominal muscle weakness in this group.     

Lower abdominal bulge after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) breast reconstruction

The etiology of lower abdominal bulge following breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap is uncertain. Most studies report an incidence that ranges from 0.7% to 5%. The purpose of this study was to review a set of factors that may predispose to a lower abdominal bulge. This was a retrospective review of 123 women who had breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap over a 4-year period. The reconstruction was unilateral in 93 women and bilateral in 30 women, totaling 153 flaps. Etiologic factors that were evaluated included patient age, diabetes mellitus, tobacco use, previous abdominal operations, unilateral or bilateral reconstruction, previous childbirth, aponeurotic plication to improve the natural abdominal contour, and use of Marlex mesh. A lower abdominal bulge occurred in 5 of the 123 women (4%), 2 following 30 bilateral reconstructions (6.6%) and 3 following 93 unilateral reconstructions (3.2%). Analysis of the factors for all women demonstrated diabetes mellitus in 1 (0.8%), tobacco use in 9 (7.3%), a prior abdominal operation in 55 (44.7%), previous childbirth in 95 (77%), aponeurotic plication in 49 (40%), and use of Marlex mesh in 4 (3.3%). Statistical analysis did not show any significant association between the explanatory factors and the occurrence of a lower abdominal bulge, except for a weak trend in women who had not been pregnant (P = 0.08). The results of this study demonstrate that the occurrence of a lower abdominal bulge following the DIEP flap is a random event that can occur in anyone. Pregnancy may confer a preventative effect as the collagen fibers strengthen to overcome the stretching forces. Techniques for prevention and treatment include intraoperative assessment of the anterior rectus sheath, use of an adjuvant material for reinforcement if unstable, and vertical plication for bulge repair.     

Smoking increases donor site complications in breast reconstruction with DIEP flap

Objective: Reconstruction with deep inferior epigastric perforator flap (DIEP) is considered to be the first choice for autologous breast reconstruction. The primary aims of this retrospective study were to find out if differences in smoking habits and BMI are useful predictors for postoperative complications in DIEP surgery.

Methods: Three hundred and one patients were included. Data regarding smoking habits, BMI, age at surgery, total and final flap weight, abdominal scars, parity, number of perforators, chemotherapy, post mastectomy radiation therapy, and preoperative mapping of perforators with either Computer Tomography Angiography or hand-held ultra sound Doppler were collected. Complications that occurred in the first 30 postoperative days were taken into account.

Results and conclusions: It was found that former smokers had a risk for donor site complication more than double that of never smokers (OR =2.12, CI =1.10–4.10, p?=?0.025). Differences in BMI within the range from 18–33.7 did not have any significant impact on complication rates, neither at the donor site nor at the breast.