共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 46 毫秒
1.
Peter G. Passias Samantha R. Horn Cyrus M. Jalai Gregory Poorman Olivia J. Bono Subaraman Ramchandran Justin S. Smith Justin K. Scheer Daniel M. Sciubba D. Kojo Hamilton Gregory Mundis Cheongeun Oh Eric O. Klineberg Virginie Lafage Christopher I. Shaffrey Christopher P. Ames 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1633-1640
Background Context
Complication rates for adult cervical deformity are poorly characterized given the complexity and heterogeneity of cases.Purpose
To compare perioperative complication rates following adult cervical deformity corrective surgery between a prospective multicenter database for patients with cervical deformity (PCD) and the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS).Study Design/Setting
Retrospective review of prospective databases.Patient Sample
A total of 11,501 adult patients with cervical deformity (11,379 patients from the NIS and 122 patients from the PCD database).Outcome Measures
Perioperative medical and surgical complications.Methods
The NIS was queried (2001–2013) for cervical deformity discharges for patients ≥18 years undergoing cervical fusions using International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding. Patients ≥18 years from the PCD database (2013–2015) were selected. Equivalent complications were identified and rates were compared. Bonferroni correction (p<.004) was used for Pearson chi-square. Binary logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in complication rates between databases.Results
A total of 11,379 patients from the NIS database and 122 patiens from the PCD database were identified. Patients from the PCD database were older (62.49 vs. 55.15, p<.001) but displayed similar gender distribution. Intraoperative complication rate was higher in the PCD (39.3%) group than in the NIS (9.2%, p<.001) database. The PCD database had an increased risk of reporting overall complications than the NIS (odds ratio: 2.81, confidence interval: 1.81–4.38). Only device-related complications were greater in the NIS (7.1% vs. 1.1%, p=.007). Patients from the PCD database displayed higher rates of the following complications: peripheral vascular (0.8% vs. 0.1%, p=.001), gastrointestinal (GI) (2.5% vs. 0.2%, p<.001), infection (8.2% vs. 0.5%, p<.001), dural tear (4.1% vs. 0.6%, p<.001), and dysphagia (9.8% vs. 1.9%, p<.001). Genitourinary, wound, and deep veinthrombosis (DVT) complications were similar between databases (p>.004). Based on surgicalapproach, the PCD reported higher GI and neurologic complication rates for combined anterior-posterior procedures (p<.001). For posterior-only procedures, the NIS had more device-related complications (12.4% vs. 0.1%, p=.003), whereas PCD had more infections (9.3% vs. 0.7%, p<.001).Conclusions
Analysis of the surgeon-maintained cervical database revealed higher overall and individual complication rates and higher data granularity. The nationwide database may underestimate complications of patients with adult cervical deformity (ACD) particularly in regard to perioperative surgical details owing to coding and deformity generalizations. The surgeon-maintained database captures the surgical details, but may underestimate some medical complications. 相似文献2.
Parthasarathy Thirumala James Zhou Piruthiviraj Natarajan Jeffrey Balzer Edward Dixon David Okonkwo D.K. Hamilton 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1611-1624
Background Context
Perioperative neurologic complications after spine surgery may increase morbidity and health-care costs related to the procedure.Purpose
We estimate the national incidence of perioperative neurologic complications following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical fusion, and thoracolumbar fusion procedures using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from 1999 to 2011. Additionally, we identify risk factors for developing perioperative neurologic complications and the effects of these injuries on quantifiable patient outcomes.Study Design
A cross-sectional study was carried out.Patient Sample
All patients included in the NIS databases from 1999 to 2011 comprised the sample.Outcome Measures
The primary outcome evaluated was the incidence of new neurologic deficits following elective spine surgery. Secondary outcomes evaluated include length of hospital stay, total hospital charges, hospital mortality rate, and discharge disposition.Methods
A retrospective analysis of the NIS databases from the years 1999 to 2011 was conducted to identify the proportion of patients who underwent ACDFs, posterior cervical fusions, and thoracolumbar fusions who also developed perioperative neurologic complications. Statistical analyses were also conducted to identify statistically significant differences in demographics and outcomes between patients who did and did not develop perioperative neurologic complications.Results
From 1999 to 2011, the total national incidence of perioperative neurologic deficits following elective ACDFs, posterior cervical fusions, and thoracolumbar fusions was 0.82%, which equates to a total of 15,066 patients who experienced these complications. The annual incidence rate of perioperative neurologic deficits has increased 54.41%, from 0.68% in the year 1999 to 1.05% in the year 2011. Additionally, the total number of procedures performed increased from 82,167 in 1999 to 186,353 in the year 2011. Perioperative neurologic deficits were associated with longer lengths of stay (9.68 days vs. 2.59 days; p<.001), higher total charges ($110,326.23 vs. $48,695.93; p<.001), and higher in-hospital mortality (2.84% vs. 0.13%; p<.001).Conclusions
The incidence rate of perioperative neurologic deficits associated with elective spine surgery documented in the NIS has increased over the time period from 1999 to 2011. The number of elective spine procedures performed has also increased over the same time period. Finally, outcomes data indicate that occurrence of perioperative neurologic complications is associated with increased rates of morbidity and mortality, as well as increased health-care use and cost. These trends indicate that the perioperative neurologic complications following spine surgery represent a growing problem in today's health-care system; further study is warranted to prevent and treat these complications to improve patient care and reduce health-care use and cost. 相似文献3.
Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal Alejandro Gomez-Rice Tamara Rodríguez-López Lorenzo Zúñiga Javier Pizones Ana Núñez-García Enrique Izquierdo 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):56-61
Background Context
Most of the papers correlate sagittal radiographic parameters with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores for patients with scoliosis. However, we do not know how changes in sagittal profile influence clinical outcomes after surgery in adult population operated for mainly frontal deformity.Purpose
This study aimed to analyze spinal sagittal profile in a population operated on adult idiopathic scoliosis (AS) and to describe variations in sagittal parameters after surgery and the association between those variations and clinical outcomes.Design/Setting
This is a historical cohort study.Patient Sample
We included in this study 40 patients operated on AS, older than 40 at the time of surgery (mean age 54.9), and with more than 2-year follow-up (mean 7.4 years).Outcome Measures
Full-length free-standing radiographs, Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS22) and Short Form 36 (SF36) instruments, and satisfaction with outcomes were available at final follow-up.Methods
Sagittal preoperative and final follow-up radiographic parameters, radiographic correlation with HRQOL scores at final follow-up, and association between satisfaction and changes in sagittal profile were analyzed. A multivariate analysis was performed. No funds were received for this article.Results
Preoperatively, the spinal sagittal plane tended to exhibit kyphosis. Most sagittal parameters did not improve at final follow-up with respect to preoperative values. We saw, after univariate analysis, that worse sagittal profile leads to worse HRQOL, but after multivariate analysis, only spinal tilt (ST) persisted as possible predictor for worse SRS activity scores. Frontal Cobb significantly improved. Most patients (82%) were satisfied with final outcomes. Variations in sagittal profile parameters did not differ between satisfied and dissatisfied patients.Conclusions
Although most sagittal plane parameters did not improve after surgery, surgical treatment in AS achieves a high satisfaction rate. Good clinical results do not correlate with improving sagittal plane parameters. Sagittal profile measurements are not helpful to decide surgical treatment in patients with mainly frontal deformity. 相似文献4.
Jai Deep Thakur Christopher Storey Piyush Kalakoti Osama Ahmed Rimal H. Dossani Richard P. Menger Kanika Sharma Hai Sun Anil Nanda 《The spine journal》2017,17(10):1435-1448
Background Context
Evidence-based consensus on timing to surgical decompression following symptom onset in patients with cauda equina syndrome (CES) is limited or widely debated.Purpose
This study aimed to investigate whether timing to intervention in the management of patients with CES has an impact on outcomes.Study Design/Setting
This is a retrospective cohort study.Patient Sample
The patient sample included 4,066 adult patients with CES registered in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database (2005–2011) and undergoing elective decompression surgery.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures are inpatient mortality, unfavorable discharge (discharge to rehabilitation), prolonged length of stay (LOS>75th percentile), and high hospital charges in patients undergoing decompression for CES.Methods
The patients were stratified into three categories based on timing to surgical intervention: (1) within 24 hours (n=1,846, 45.6%); (2) between 24 and 48 hours (n=1,080, 26.6%), and (3) beyond 48 hours (n=1,130, 27.8%). Multivariable logistic regression fitted with generalized estimating equations using the sandwich variance-covariance matrix estimator to account for the clustering of similar outcomes within hospitals was used to examine the association of timing to surgical intervention categories with binary primary end points. For metric end points (charges), we used the ordinary least squares model to test the effect of timing to intervention.Results
The mean age of the cohort was 50.19±17.55 years and 41% were female. In comparison to patients operated within 24 hours, increased likelihood of inpatient mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.61, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32–9.85, p=.012), unfavorable discharge (OR: 2.23, 95% CI: 1.87–2.66, p<.001), prolonged postsurgical LOS (OR: 1.76, 95% CI: 1.44–2.14, p<.001), and high hospital charges (OR:1.92, 95% CI: 1.81–2.05, p<.001) were observed in patients operated on over 48 hours since admission. Likewise, patients with incomplete CES with intervention beyond 48 hours had higher odds for unfavorable discharge (OR: 2.51, 95% CI: 1.99–3.17, p<.001), prolonged postsurgical LOS (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 1.35–2.20, p<.001), and high hospital charges (OR: 1.94, 95% CI: 1.79–2.10, p<.001). Likewise, patients with complete CES with interventions beyond 48 hours had higher odds for unfavorable discharge (OR: 1.86, 95% CI: 1.41–2.45, p<.001), prolonged postsurgical LOS (OR: 2.06, 95% CI: 1.53–2.77, p<.001), and high hospital charges (OR: 1.39, 95% CI: 1.15–1.68, p<.001).Conclusions
Early intervention in CES, regardless of the subtype (complete or incomplete), has higher likelihood of improved inpatient outcomes. The odds of getting better were higher, however, with incomplete CES. The timing of intervention did not seem to matter in traumatic CES as compared with degenerative etiology. Prospective randomized controlled trials may further help elucidate the impact of early intervention on outcomes in patients with CES. 相似文献5.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Alex Quok An Teo Kimberly-Anne Tan Li Wen Nathaniel Ng Leok-Lim Lau Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):799-806
Background Context
The current prevailing school of thought in spinal deformity surgery is to restore sagittal balance with reference to the alignment of the spine when the patient is standing. This strategy, however, likely accounts for increased rates of proximal junctional failure.Purpose
The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences between the spine in standing and sitting positions as these may elucidate reasons for deformity correction failure.Study Design/Setting
A prospective, comparative study of 58 healthy patients presenting to a tertiary hospital over a 6-month period was carried out.Patient Sample
All patients presenting with a less than 3-month history of first episode lower back pain were included. Patients who had radicular symptoms, red flag symptoms, previous spine surgery, or visible spinal deformity during forward bending test were excluded. Pregnant patients were also excluded.Outcome Measures
Radiographic measurements including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar angle (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), cervical lordosis (CL), pelvic incidence (PI), and pelvic tilt (PT) were collected. The sagittal apex and end vertebrae of all radiographs were also recorded.Methods
Basic demographic data (age, gender, and ethnicity) was recorded. Lateral standing and sitting radiographs were obtained using EOS technology. Statistical analysis was performed to compare standing and sitting parameters using chi-square tests for categorical variables and paired t tests for continuous variables.Results
Taking the standing position as the reference point, forward displacement of the SVA occurred during sitting by a mean of 6.39±3.87?cm (p<.001). This was accompanied by a reduction of LL and TK by a mean of 24.63±12.70° (p<.001) and 8.56±7.21°(p<.001), respectively. The TL became more lordotic by a mean of 3.25±7.30° (p<.001). The CL only reached borderline significance (p=.047) for increased lordosis by a mean of 3.45±12.92°. The PT also increased by 50% (p<.001). Despite relatively constant end vertebrae, the apex vertebra moved inferiorly for the thoracic curve (p<.006) and superiorly for the lumbar curve (p<.001) by approximately one vertebral level each.Conclusions
Sagittal spinal alignment changes significantly between standing and sitting positions. Understanding these differences is crucial to avoid overcorrection of LL, which may occur if deformity correction is based solely on the spine's standing sagittal profile. 相似文献6.
Hiroyuki Aono Keisuke Ishii Hidekazu Tobimatsu Yukitaka Nagamoto Shota Takenaka Masayuki Furuya Horii Chiaki Motoki Iwasaki 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1113-1119
Background Context
Short-segment posterior spinal instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fracture provides superior correction of kyphosis by an indirect reduction technique, but it has a high failure rate.Purpose
The purpose of the study we report here was to compare outcomes for temporary short-segment pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty and for such fixation without vertebroplasty.Study Design
This is a prospective multicenter comparative study.Patient Sample
We studied 62 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who underwent short-segment posterior instrumentation using ligamentotaxis with Schanz screws with or without vertebroplasty.Outcome Measures
Radiological parameters (Cobb angle on standing lateral radiographs) were used.Methods
Implants were removed approximately 1 year after surgery. Neurologic function, kyphotic deformity, canal compromise, and fracture severity were evaluated prospectively.Results
After surgery, all patients with neurologic deficit had improvement equivalent to at least one grade on the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale and had fracture union. Kyphotic deformity was reduced significantly, and reduction of the vertebrae was maintained with and without vertebroplasty, regardless of load-sharing classification. Although no patient required additional anterior reconstruction, kyphotic change was observed at disc level mainly after implant removal with or without vertebroplasty.Conclusions
Temporary short-segment fixation yielded satisfactory results in the reduction and maintenance of fractured vertebrae with or without vertebroplasty. Kyphosis recurrence may be inevitable because adjacent discs can be injured during the original trauma. 相似文献7.
Shujie Wang Yang Yang Jianguo Zhang Ye Tian Jianxiong Shen Shengru Wang 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):76-80
Background Context
Intraoperative monitoring (IOM) is an essential method for preventing postoperative spinal deficits during posterior vertebral column resection (VCR) surgery for treatment of severe spine deformities, but the IOM features directing at VCR procedures are rarely reported and need to be further clarified.Purpose
To evaluate an important surgical point that will lead to the IOM loss frequently, and then remind the surgeons to pay close attention to impending monitoring changes during posterior VCR surgery.Study Design/Setting
Retrospective study.Patient Sample
A total of 77 patients with severe spine deformities who underwent posterior VCR and deformity correction surgeries from January 2012 to May 2015 are retrospectively analyzed in our spine center.Outcome Measures
IOM (motor-evoked potentials [MEP] and somatosensory-evoked potentials) was used for intraoperative spinal function assessment.Methods
Patients were divided into 2 groups according to their preoperative spinal function, including 27 patients with preoperative spinal deficits and 50 patients with spinal normal. And the IOM data during surgery, especially among VCR procedures, were mainly analyzed in the present study.Results
With the VCR procedure almost complete, most patients showed varying degrees of IOM loss that included 37 cases showing obvious IOM degenerations and 21 cases showing significant IOM loss with alerts immediately. Moreover, the patients with preoperative spinal deficits have more significant decreasing percentage in MEP amplitude (81% vs. 68%, p<.05) than those patients without.Conclusions
With the VCR procedure almost complete, surgeons must pay closely attention to the IOM signals and should be ready to take corresponding surgical measures to deal with the impeding monitoring loss. 相似文献8.
Background Context
Short-term readmission rates are becoming widely used as a quality and performance metric for hospitals. Data on unplanned short-term readmission after spine fusion for deformity in pediatric patients are limited.Purpose
To characterize the rate and risk factors for short-term readmission after spine fusion for deformity in pediatric patients.Study Design
This is a retrospective cohort study.Patient Sample
Data were obtained from the State Inpatient Database from New York, Utah, Nebraska, Florida, North Carolina (years 2006–2010), and California (years 2006–2011).Outcome Measures
Outcome measures included 30- and 90-day readmission rates.Materials and Methods
Inclusion criteria were patients aged 0–21 years, a primary diagnosis of spine deformity, and a primary 3+-level lumbar or thoracic fusion. Exclusion criteria included revision surgery at index admission and cervical fusion. Readmission rates were calculated and logistic analyses were used to identify independent predictors of readmission.Results
There were a total of 13,287 patients with a median age of 14 years. Sixty-seven percent were girls. The overall 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 4.7% and 6.1%. The most common reasons for readmission were infection (38% at 30 days and 33% at 90 days), wound dehiscence (19% and 17%), and pulmonary complications (12% and 13%). On multivariate analysis, predictors of 30-day readmission included male sex (p=.008), neuromuscular (p<.0001) or congenital scoliosis (p=.006), Scheuermann kyphosis (p=.003), Medicaid insurance (p<.0001), length of stay of ≤3 days or ≥6 days (p<.0001), and surgery at a teaching hospital (p=.011). Surgery at a hospital performing >80 operations/year was associated with a 34% reduced risk of 30-day readmission (95% confidence interval 12%-50%, p=.005) compared with hospitals performing <20 operations/year.Conclusions
The short-term readmission rate for pediatric spine deformity surgery is driven by patient-related factors, as well as several risk factors that may be modified to reduce this rate. 相似文献9.
Joseph E. Tanenbaum Vincent J. Alentado Jacob A. Miller Daniel Lubelski Edward C. Benzel Thomas E. Mroz 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):338-345
Background Context
Lumbar fusion is a common and costly procedure in the United States. Reimbursement for surgical procedures is increasingly tied to care quality and patient safety as part of value-based reimbursement programs. The incidence of adverse quality events among lumbar fusion patients is unknown using the definition of care quality (patient safety indicators [PSI]) used by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The association between insurance status and the incidence of PSI is similarly unknown in lumbar fusion patients.Purpose
This study sought to determine the incidence of PSI in patients undergoing inpatient lumbar fusion and to quantify the association between primary payer status and PSI in this population.Study Design
A retrospective cohort study was carried out.Patient Sample
The sample comprised all adult patients aged 18 years and older who were included in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) that underwent lumbar fusion from 1998 to 2011.Outcome Measure
The incidence of one or more PSI, a validated and widely used metric of inpatient health-care quality and patient safety, was the primary outcome variable.Methods
The NIS data were examined for all cases of inpatient lumbar fusion from 1998 to 2011. The incidence of adverse patient safety events (PSI) was determined using publicly available lists of the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes. Logistic regression models were used to determine the association between primary payer status (Medicaid and self-pay relative to private insurance) and the incidence of PSI.Results
A total of 539,172 adult lumbar fusion procedures were recorded in the NIS from 1998 to 2011. Patients were excluded from the secondary analysis if “other” or “missing” was listed for primary insurance status. The national incidence of PSI was calculated to be 2,445 per 100,000 patient years of observation, or approximately 2.5%. In a secondary analysis, after adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid and self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more PSI during the inpatient episode relative to privately insured patients (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 1.07–1.27).Conclusions
Among patients undergoing inpatient lumbar fusion, insurance status is associated with the adverse health-care quality events used to determine hospital reimbursement by the CMS. The source of this disparity must be studied to improve the quality of care delivered to vulnerable patient populations. 相似文献10.
Jeffrey L. Gum Richard Hostin Chessie Robinson Michael P. Kelly Leah Yacat Carreon David W. Polly R. Shay Bess Douglas C. Burton Christopher I. Shaffrey Justin S. Smith Virginie LaFage Frank J. Schwab Christopher P. Ames Steven D. Glassman 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):96-101
Background Context
Over the past decade, the number of adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries has more than doubled in the United States. The complex surgeries needed to manage ASD are associated with significant resource utilization and high cost, making them a primary target for increased scrutiny. Accordingly, it is important to not only demonstrate value in ASD surgery as clinical effectiveness but also to translate outcome assessment to cost-effectiveness.Purpose
To compare the difference between Medicare allowable rates and the actual, direct hospital costs for ASD surgeries.Study Design
Longitudinal cohort.Patient Sample
Consecutive patients enrolled in an ASD database from a single institution.Outcome Measures
Short Form (SF)-6D.Methods
Consecutive patients enrolled in an ASD database from a single institution from 2008 to 2013 were identified. Direct hospital costs were collected from hospital administrative records for the entire inpatient episode of surgical care. Medicare allowable rates were calculated for the same inpatient stays using the year-appropriate Center for Medicare-Medicaid Services Inpatient Pricer Payment System Tool. The SF-6D, a utility index derived from the SF-36v1, was used to determine quality-adjusted life years (QALY). Costs and QALYs were discounted at 3.5% annually.Results
Of 580 surgical ASD patients eligible for 2-year follow up, 346 (60%) had complete baseline and 2-year data, and 60 were Medicare beneficiaries comprising the cohort for the present study. Mean SF-6D gained is 0.10 during year 1 after surgery and 0.02 at year 2, resulting in a cumulative SF-6D gain of 0.12 over 2 years. Mean Medicare allowable rate over the 2 years is $82,050 (range $42,383 to $220,749) and mean direct cost is $99,114 (range $28,447 to $217,717). Mean cost per QALY over 2 years is $683,750 using Medicare allowable rates and $825,950 using direct costs. This difference of $17,181 between the 2 cost calculation represents a 17% difference, which was statistically significant (p<.001).Conclusions
There is a significant difference in direct hospital costs versus Medicare allowable rates in ASD surgery and in turn, there is a similar difference in the cost per QALY calculation. Utilizing Medicare allowable rates not only underestimates (17%) the cost of ASD surgery, but it also creates inaccurate and unrealistic expectations for researchers and policymakers. 相似文献11.
Takeshi Oichi Hirotaka Chikuda Junichi Ohya Ryo Ohtomo Kojiro Morita Hiroki Matsui Kiyohide Fushimi Sakae Tanaka Hideo Yasunaga 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):531-537
Background Context
There is a lack of information about postoperative outcomes and related risk factors associated with spinal surgery in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD).Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the postoperative morbidity and mortality associated with spinal surgery for patients with PD, and the risk factors for poor outcomes.Study Design
This is a retrospective matched-pair cohort study.Patient Sample
Data of patients who underwent elective spinal surgery between July 2010 and March 2013 were extracted from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a nationwide inpatient database in Japan.Outcome Measures
In-hospital mortality and occurrence of postoperative complications.Methods
For each patient with PD, we randomly selected up to four age- and sex-matched controls in the same hospital in the same year. The differences in in-hospital mortality and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between patients with PD and controls. A multivariable logistic regression model fitted with a generalized estimation equation was used to identify significant predictors of major complications (surgical site infection, sepsis, pulmonary embolism, respiratory complications, cardiac events, stroke, and renal failure). Multiple imputation was used for missing data.Results
Among 154,278 patients undergoing spinal surgery, 1,423 patients with PD and 5,498 matched controls were identified. Crude in-hospital mortality was higher in patients with PD than in controls (0.8% vs. 0.3%, respectively). The crude proportion of major complications was also higher in patients with PD (9.8% vs. 5.1% in controls). Postoperative delirium was more common in patients with PD (30.3%) than in controls (4.3%). Parkinson's disease was a significant predictor of major postoperative complications, even after adjusting for other risk factors (odds ratio, 1.74; 95% confidence intervals, 1.37–2.22; p<.001).Conclusions
Patients with PD had a significantly increased risk of postoperative complications following spinal surgery. Postoperative delirium was the most frequently observed complication. 相似文献12.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Gordon Chengyuan Wong Chloe Xiaoyun Chan Leok-Lim Lau Naresh Kumar Joseph Shantakumar Thambiah John Nathaniel Ruiz Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):830-836
Background Context
Knowledge of sagittal radiographic parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has not yet caught up with our understanding of their roles in patients with adult spinal deformity. It is likely that more emphasis will be placed in restoring sagittal parameters for AIS patients in the future. Therefore, we need to understand how these parameters may vary in AIS to facilitate management plans.Purpose
This study aimed to determine the reproducibility of sagittal spinal parameters on lateral film radiographs in patients with AIS.Study Design/Setting
This was a retrospective, comparative study conducted in a tertiary health-care institution from January 2013 to February 2016 (3-year period).Patient Sample
All AIS patients who underwent deformity correction surgery from January 2013 to February 2016 and had two preoperative serial lateral radiographs taken within the time period of a month were included in the study.Outcome Measures
Radiographic sagittal spinal parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), thoracolumbar alignment (TL), lumbar lordosis (LL); standard spinopelvic measurements such as pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS); as well as end and apical vertebrae of cervical, thoracic, and lumbar curves were the outcome measures.Methods
All patient data were pooled from electronic medical records, and X-ray images were retrieved from Centricity Enterprise Web. Averaged X-ray measurements by two independent assessors were analyzed by comparing two radiographs of the same patients performed within a 1-month time period. Chi-squared and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used for categorical and continuous variables.Results
The study cohort comprised 138 patients, 28 men and 110 women, with a mean age of 15 years (range 11–20). Between the two lateral X-rays, there was a mean difference of 0.79?cm in SVA (p<.001), 0.70° in LL (p=.033), and 0.73° in PT (p=.010). In the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup, there was a similar 0.77?cm (p=.002), 0.79° (p=.009), and 1.49° (p=.001) mean difference in SVA, LL, and PT, respectively. Additionally, there was also a 1.85° (p=.009) and 1.76° (p=.006) mean difference seen in TL and SS, respectively. The overall profile of the sagittal curves remained largely similar, with only the lumbar apex shifting from L3 to L4 during the first and the second X-rays, respectively (p<.001). This occurred for the combined Lenke 1 and 2 subgroup as well (p<.001).Conclusion
Most radiographic sagittal spinal parameters in AIS patients are generally reproducible with some variations up to a maximum of 4°. This natural variation should be taken into account when interpreting these radiographic sagittal parameters so as to achieve the most accurate results in surgical planning. 相似文献13.
Amandeep Bhalla Andrew J. Schoenfeld Jaiben George Michael Moghimi Christopher M. Bono 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):143-149
Background Context
Understanding the influence of preoperative diagnosis on outcomes for lumbar fusion surgery improves the quality of research and outcomes data, and helps guide treatment decisions.Purpose
We sought to perform a systematic review of the literature published between 2000 and 2014 regarding lumbar fusion outcomes for degenerative disorders. An assessment of the influence of subgroup diagnosis on outcomes as well as the quality of this body of literature was performed.Study Design
Systematic reviewPatient Sample
The 100 studies ultimately included involved adult patients (n=8,706) undergoing fusion surgery for degenerative disorders of the lumbar spine.Outcome Measures
Visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, complication rates, and determination of successful fusionMethods
With adherence to the PRISMA guidelines, electronic searches were performed through PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify all studies involving lumbar fusion for degenerative disc disorders from January 2000 to August 2014. Studies were eligible for inclusion if they addressed adult patients treated with lumbar fusion for one of the following: stable degenerative disc disease, unstable degenerative disc disease, degenerative disc disease not specified (DDDns), herniated disc (DH), degenerative spondylolisthesis (DDDsp), and adult degenerative scoliosis (DDDsc). Abstracted data included the number of patients, preoperative diagnosis, fusion technique, complications, fusion rate, and clinical outcomes.Results
One hundred articles met inclusion criteria and yielded data for 8,706 patients. Forty-three studies included data for clinical improvement (VAS scores). The mean clinical improvement in VAS scores was significantly different among the diagnoses (p<.001), with DDDsp demonstrating the highest improvement (60%) and DDDns having the lowest (45%). Eighty-five studies included data for complication rates. Complication rates differed significantly (p<.001), with the highest rate seen in the DDDsc group (18%), followed by DDDsp (14%). Seventy-eight studies included data for fusion. The pooled odds of fusion for prospective studies were 6.93 (95% CI 4.75, 10.13). There was no evidence of publication bias.Conclusions
A relationship between outcomes and subgroup diagnosis was demonstrated. This review demonstrated a higher quality of evidence in the literature, and greater overall fusion rates compared to similar studies published in the 1980s and 1990s. 相似文献14.
Jan Triebel Greta Snellman Bengt Sandén Fredrik Strömqvist Yohan Robinson 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):656-662
Background Context
Proper patient selection is of utmost importance in the surgical treatment of degenerative disc disease (DDD) with chronic low back pain (CLBP). Among other factors, gender was previously found to influence lumbar fusion surgery outcome.Purpose
This study investigates whether gender affects clinical outcome after lumbar fusion.Study Design
This is a national registry cohort study.Patient sample
Between 2001 and 2011, 2,251 men and 2,521 women were followed prospectively within the Swedish National Spine Register (SWESPINE) after lumbar fusion surgery for DDD and CLBP.Outcome measures
Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), quality of life (QoL) parameter EQ5D, and labor status and pain medication were collected preoperatively, 1 and 2 years after surgery.Methods
Gender differences of baseline data and PROM improvement from baseline were analyzed. The effect of gender on clinically important improvement of PROM was determined in a multivariate logistic regression model. Furthermore, gender-related differences in return-to-work were investigated.Results
Preoperatively, women had worse leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.002), lower QoL (p<.001), and greater disability than men (p=.001). Postoperatively, women presented greater improvement 2 years from baseline for pain, function, and QoL (all p<.01). Women had better chances of a clinically important improvement than men for leg pain (odds ratio [OR]=1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19–1.61, p<.01) and back pain (OR=1.20,95% CI:1.03–1.40, p=.02) as well as ODI (OR=1.24, 95% CI:1.05–1.47, p=.01), but improved at a slower pace in leg pain (p<.001), back pain (p=.009), and disability (p=.008). No gender differences were found in QoL and return to work at 2 years postoperatively.Conclusions
Swedish women do not have worse results than men after spinal fusion surgery. Female patients present with worse pain and function preoperatively, but improve more than men do after surgery. 相似文献15.
Minji K. Lee Kathleen J. Yost Jennifer S. McDonald Ryne W. Dougherty Roanna L. Vine David F. Kallmes 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):821-829
Background Context
The majority of validation done on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been in patients with mild or moderate disability. There is paucity of research focusing on the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Purpose
To evaluate the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Study Design/Setting
Observational clinical study.Sample
The sample consisted of 214 patients with painful vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.Outcome Measures
The 23-item version of the RMDQ was completed at two time points: baseline and 30-day postintervention follow-up.Methods
With the two-parameter logistic unidimensional item response theory (IRT) analyses, we derived the range of scores that produced reliable measurement and investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).Results
Scores for 214 (100%) patients at baseline and 108 (50%) patients at follow-up did not meet the reliability criterion of 0.90 or higher, with the majority of patients having disability due to back pain that was too severe to be reliably measured by the RMDQ. Depending on methodology, MCID estimates ranged from 2 to 8 points and the proportion of patients classified as having experienced meaningful improvement ranged from 26% to 68%. A greater change in score was needed at the extreme ends of the score scale to be classified as having achieved MCID using IRT methods.Conclusions
Replacing items measuring moderate disability with items measuring severe disability could yield a version of the RMDQ that better targets patients with severe disability due to back pain. Improved precision in measuring disability would be valuable to clinicians who treat patients with greater functional impairments. Caution is needed when choosing criteria for interpreting meaningful change using the RMDQ. 相似文献16.
Fredrik Strömqvist Björn Strömqvist Bo Jönsson Magnus K. Karlsson 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1577-1585
Background Context
Surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) may lead to different outcomes in young, middle-aged, and elderly patients. However, no study has, by the same data ascertainment, evaluated referral pattern, improvement, and outcome in different age strata.Purpose
This study aimed to evaluate referral pattern and outcome in patients of different ages surgically treated because of LDH.Study Design
This is a register study of prospectively collected data.Patient Sample
In SweSpine, the national Swedish register for spinal surgery, we identified 11,237 patients who between 2000 and 2010 had their outcome of LDH surgery registered in pre-, per-, and 1-year postoperative evaluations.Outcome Measures
The data collected included age, gender, smoking habits, walking distance, preoperative duration and degree of back and leg pain, consumption of analgesics, quality of life in the patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol 5 dimensions (EQ5D), disability in the Oswestry Disability Index, operated level, type of surgery, and complications.Methods
We compared the outcome in patients within different 10-year age strata. IBM SPSS Statistics 22 was used in the statistical calculations. No funding was obtained for this study. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.Results
Patients in all ages referred to surgery had inferior PROM data compared with published normative age-matched PROM data. Referral to LDH surgery demanded of each 10-year strata statistically significantly more pain, lower quality of life, and more disability (all p<.001). Surgery markedly improved quality of life and reduced disability in all age groups (all p<.001), but with statistically significantly less PROM improvement with each older 10-year strata (all p<.001). This resulted in statistically significantly inferior PROM values for pain, quality of life, and disability postoperatively for each 10-year strata (all p<.001). There were also more complications (p<.001) with each 10-year older strata.Conclusions
In general, older patients referred to LDH surgery have statistically significantly inferior PROM scores, improve less, and reach inferior PROM scores postoperatively. The clinical relevance must however be questioned because most patients reach, independent of age group, the defined level for a successful outcome, and the patient satisfaction rate is high. 相似文献17.
Donald E. Fry Susan M. Nedza Michael Pine Agnes M. Reband Chun-Jung Huang Gregory Pine 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1641-1649
Background Context
Elective spine surgery is a commonly performed operative procedure, that requires knowledge of risk-adjusted results to improve outcomes and reduce costs.Purpose
To develop risk-adjusted models to predict the adverse outcomes (AOs) of care during the inpatient and 90-day post-discharge period for spine fusion surgery.Study Design/Setting
To identify the significant risk factors associated with AOs and to develop risk models that measure performance.Patient Sample
Hospitals that met minimum criteria of both 20 elective cervical and 20 elective non-cervical spine fusion operations in the 2012–2014 Medicare limited dataset.Outcome Measures
The risk-adjusted AOs of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay for the index hospitalization, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day post-discharge readmissions were dependent variables in predictive risk models.Methods
Over 500 candidate risk factors were used for logistic regression models to predict the AOs. Models were then used to predicted risk-adjusted AO rates by hospitals.Results
There were 874 hospitals with a minimum of both 20 cervical and 20 non-cervical spine fusion patients. There were 167,395 total cases. A total of 7,981 (15.9%) of cervical fusion patients and 17,481 (14.9%) of non-cervical fusion patients had one or more AOs for an overall AO rate of 15.2%. A total of 54 hospitals (6.2%) had z-scores that were 2.0 better than predicted with a median risk adjusted AO rate of 9.2%, and 75 hospitals (8.6%) were 2.0 z-scores poorer than predicted with a median risk-adjusted AO rate of 23.2%.Conclusions
Differences among hospitals defines opportunities for care improvement. 相似文献18.
Caleb J. Behrend Etienne M. Schönbach Alexander R. Vaccaro Ellen Coyne Mark L. Prasarn Glenn R. Rechtine 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1061-1065
Background Context
Determining pain intensity is largely dependent on the patient's report.Purpose
The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that patients initially reporting a pain score of 10 out of 10 on the visual analog scale (VAS) would experience symptom improvement to a degree similar to patients reporting milder pain.Study Design
This study is a retrospective chart review.Patient Sample
A total of 6,779 patients seeking care for spinal disorders were included in the study.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures used in the study were pain scores on the VAS pain scale, smoking status, morbid depression, gender, and the presence of known secondary gain.Materials and Methods
Patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease with or without spinal stenosis who reported a VAS pain score of 10 out of 10 were identified. Changes in reported VAS pain, patient age, smoking status, morbid depression, gender, and the presence of known secondary gain were examined.Results
A total of 160 individuals (2.9%) reported a maximum pain score of 10 out of 10 on a VAS at their initial presentation. The patients had a median improvement of 3 points in reported VAS pain between the first visit and the last follow-up appointment. The odds to improve by at least 40% on the VAS were 1.500 (95% confidence interval 1.090–2.065) compared with patients reporting submaximal pain. The proportion of patients with identifiable secondary gain was higher (p=.001) than that of patients with submaximal pain. Patients whose pain scores improved dramatically (ie, at least 4 points on the VAS) tended to be older (p=.001), to less often have secondary gain from their disease (p=.007), and to have a negative current smoking status (p=.002). Patients whose pain remained 10 out of 10 during the course of treatment smoked more frequently (p=.016).Conclusions
Our analysis supports the need to consider the influence of secondary gain on the patients' reported VAS pain scores. Maximum pain seems to be a more acute phenomenon with some likelihood to significantly improve. 相似文献19.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Cheung-Kue Kim Won-Gyu Lee Hyung-Suk Juh Ki-Tack Kim 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1837-1845
Background Context
The aim of spinal deformity correction is to restore the spine's functional alignment by balancing it in both the sagittal and coronal planes. Regardless of posture, the ideal coronal profile is straight, and therefore readily assessable.Purpose
This study compares two radiological methods to determine which better predicts postoperative standing coronal balance.Study Design/Setting
We conducted a single-center, radiographic comparative study between 2011 and 2015.Patient Sample
A total of 199 patients with a mean age of 55.1 years were studied. Ninety patients with degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and 109 ankylosing spondylitis (AS) were treated with posterior surgery during this period.Outcome Measures
Baseline clinical and radiographic parameters (sagittal and coronal) were recorded. Comparison was performed between the new supra-acetabular line (central sacral vertical line [CSVL1]) and conventional supra-iliac line (CSVL2) perpendicular methods of coronal balance assessment. These methods were also compared with the gold standard standing C7 plumb line.Methods
Each patient underwent standardized operative procedures and had perioperative spine X-rays obtained for assessment of spinal balance. Adjusted multivariate analysis was used to determine predictors of coronal balance.Results
Significant differences in baseline characteristics (age, gender, and radiographic parameters) were found between patients with DLS and AS. CSVL1, CSVL2, and C7 plumb line differed in all the perioperative measurements. These three radiological methods showed a mean right coronal imbalance for both diagnoses in all pre-, intra-, and postoperative radiographs. The magnitude of imbalance was the greatest for CSVL2 followed by CSVL1 and subsequently the C7 plumb line. A larger discrepancy between CSVL and C7 plumb line measurements intraoperatively than those postoperatively suggests a postural effect on these parameters, which is greater for CSVL2. Multivariate analysis identified that in DLS, the preoperative C7 plumb line was predictive of its postoperative value. CSVL1, but not CSVL2, was predictive of the postoperative C7 plumb line in patients with AS.Conclusions
The supra-acetabular line (CSVL1) is better, although not ideal, as compared with the supra-iliac line (CSVL2) in determining coronal balance. Because CSVL1 still cannot be relied on with a high predictive value, it is imperative that future studies continue to identify better intraoperative markers for achieving coronal balance. 相似文献20.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Chengyuan Gordon Wong Eugene Tze-Chun Lau Kimberly-Anne Tan Leok-Lim Lau Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):183-189