共查询到20条相似文献，搜索用时 62 毫秒
1.
Ronald H.M.A. Bartels Roland D. Donk Wim I.M. Verhagen Allard J.F. Hosman André L.M. Verbeek 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1625-1632
Background Context
The results of meta-analyses are frequently reported, but understanding and interpreting them is difficult for both clinicians and patients. Statistical significances are presented without referring to values that imply clinical relevance.Purpose
This study aimed to use the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) to rate the clinical relevance of a meta-analysis.Study Design
This study is a review of the literature.Patient Sample
This study is a review of meta-analyses relating to a specific topic, clinical results of cervical arthroplasty.Outcome Measure
The outcome measure used in the study was the MCID.Methods
We performed an extensive literature search of a series of meta-analyses evaluating a similar subject as an example. We searched in Pubmed and Embase through August 9, 2016, and found articles concerning meta-analyses of the clinical outcome of cervical arthroplasty compared with that of anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in cases of cervical degenerative disease. We evaluated the analyses for statistical significance and their relation to MCID. MCID was defined based on results in similar patient groups and a similar disease entity reported in the literature.Results
We identified 21 meta-analyses, only one of which referred to MCID. However, the researchers used an inappropriate measurement scale and, therefore, an incorrect MCID. The majority of the conclusions were based on statistical results without mentioning clinical relevance.Conclusions
The majority of the articles we reviewed drew conclusions based on statistical differences instead of clinical relevance. We recommend introducing the concept of MCID while reporting the results of a meta-analysis, as well as mentioning the explicit scale of the analyzed measurement. 相似文献2.
Donald E. Fry Susan M. Nedza Michael Pine Agnes M. Reband Chun-Jung Huang Gregory Pine 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1641-1649
Background Context
Elective spine surgery is a commonly performed operative procedure, that requires knowledge of risk-adjusted results to improve outcomes and reduce costs.Purpose
To develop risk-adjusted models to predict the adverse outcomes (AOs) of care during the inpatient and 90-day post-discharge period for spine fusion surgery.Study Design/Setting
To identify the significant risk factors associated with AOs and to develop risk models that measure performance.Patient Sample
Hospitals that met minimum criteria of both 20 elective cervical and 20 elective non-cervical spine fusion operations in the 2012–2014 Medicare limited dataset.Outcome Measures
The risk-adjusted AOs of inpatient deaths, prolonged length-of-stay for the index hospitalization, 90-day post-discharge deaths, and 90-day post-discharge readmissions were dependent variables in predictive risk models.Methods
Over 500 candidate risk factors were used for logistic regression models to predict the AOs. Models were then used to predicted risk-adjusted AO rates by hospitals.Results
There were 874 hospitals with a minimum of both 20 cervical and 20 non-cervical spine fusion patients. There were 167,395 total cases. A total of 7,981 (15.9%) of cervical fusion patients and 17,481 (14.9%) of non-cervical fusion patients had one or more AOs for an overall AO rate of 15.2%. A total of 54 hospitals (6.2%) had z-scores that were 2.0 better than predicted with a median risk adjusted AO rate of 9.2%, and 75 hospitals (8.6%) were 2.0 z-scores poorer than predicted with a median risk-adjusted AO rate of 23.2%.Conclusions
Differences among hospitals defines opportunities for care improvement. 相似文献3.
Hiroyuki Aono Keisuke Ishii Hidekazu Tobimatsu Yukitaka Nagamoto Shota Takenaka Masayuki Furuya Horii Chiaki Motoki Iwasaki 《The spine journal》2017,17(8):1113-1119
Background Context
Short-segment posterior spinal instrumentation for thoracolumbar burst fracture provides superior correction of kyphosis by an indirect reduction technique, but it has a high failure rate.Purpose
The purpose of the study we report here was to compare outcomes for temporary short-segment pedicle screw fixation with vertebroplasty and for such fixation without vertebroplasty.Study Design
This is a prospective multicenter comparative study.Patient Sample
We studied 62 consecutive patients with thoracolumbar burst fracture who underwent short-segment posterior instrumentation using ligamentotaxis with Schanz screws with or without vertebroplasty.Outcome Measures
Radiological parameters (Cobb angle on standing lateral radiographs) were used.Methods
Implants were removed approximately 1 year after surgery. Neurologic function, kyphotic deformity, canal compromise, and fracture severity were evaluated prospectively.Results
After surgery, all patients with neurologic deficit had improvement equivalent to at least one grade on the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale and had fracture union. Kyphotic deformity was reduced significantly, and reduction of the vertebrae was maintained with and without vertebroplasty, regardless of load-sharing classification. Although no patient required additional anterior reconstruction, kyphotic change was observed at disc level mainly after implant removal with or without vertebroplasty.Conclusions
Temporary short-segment fixation yielded satisfactory results in the reduction and maintenance of fractured vertebrae with or without vertebroplasty. Kyphosis recurrence may be inevitable because adjacent discs can be injured during the original trauma. 相似文献4.
Permsak Paholpak Alexander Nazareth Patrick C. Hsieh Zorica Buser Jeffrey C. Wang 《The spine journal》2017,17(9):1272-1284
Background Context
T1 slope is a novel thoracic parameter used to assess cervical spine sagittal balance. Thoracic index (TI) parameters including T1 slope and cervical sagittal alignment parameters may play an important role in degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS). Current literature regarding the relationship between TI and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with DCS is limited.Purpose
(1) To evaluate the T1 slope, cervical sagittal alignment, and thoracic inlet parameter in patients with DCS using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI), and (2) to find a correlation between the T1 slope, TI, and other cervical sagittal parameters in patients with DCS.Design/Setting
Retrospective kMRI study, Level III.Patient Sample
Fifty-two patients with DCS from 1,128 patients from a cervical kMRI database.Outcome Measures
T1 slope, C2–C7 angle, sagittal vertical axis C2–C7 (SVA C2–C7), cranial tilt, cervical tilt, neck tilt, and thoracic inlet angle (TIA).Methods
Cervical spine kMRIs of 52 patients with DCS (mean age 51.7±standard deviation) were analyzed in neutral, flexion, and extension positions. Patients with DCS were divided into two groups: anterolisthesis (N=33) and retrolisthesis (N=19). Each listhesis group was subclassified into grade 1 (slip 2–3?mm) and grade 2 (slip>3?mm).Results
Grade 2 retrolisthesis had the largest T1 slope followed by grade 1 retrolisthesis, grade 2 anterolisthesis, and grade 1 anterolisthesis. Significant differences were found between the anterolisthesis and the retrolisthesis groups in the neutral position (p=.025). The flexion position had the largest T1 slope and showed a significant difference with anterolisthesis in the neutral position (p=.041). Sagittal vertical axis C2–C7 showed strong correlation with cranial tilt in all DCS groups and all positions.Conclusions
In our study, T1 slope was larger in grade 2 DCS, and the retrolisthesis group had larger T1 slope than the anterolisthesis group. Presence of larger T1 slope was significantly correlated with larger cervical lordosis curvature. Furthermore, cranial tilt was strongly correlated with SVA C2–C7. 相似文献5.
Felisa Sánchez-Mariscal Alejandro Gomez-Rice Tamara Rodríguez-López Lorenzo Zúñiga Javier Pizones Ana Núñez-García Enrique Izquierdo 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):56-61
Background Context
Most of the papers correlate sagittal radiographic parameters with health-related quality of life (HRQOL) scores for patients with scoliosis. However, we do not know how changes in sagittal profile influence clinical outcomes after surgery in adult population operated for mainly frontal deformity.Purpose
This study aimed to analyze spinal sagittal profile in a population operated on adult idiopathic scoliosis (AS) and to describe variations in sagittal parameters after surgery and the association between those variations and clinical outcomes.Design/Setting
This is a historical cohort study.Patient Sample
We included in this study 40 patients operated on AS, older than 40 at the time of surgery (mean age 54.9), and with more than 2-year follow-up (mean 7.4 years).Outcome Measures
Full-length free-standing radiographs, Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS22) and Short Form 36 (SF36) instruments, and satisfaction with outcomes were available at final follow-up.Methods
Sagittal preoperative and final follow-up radiographic parameters, radiographic correlation with HRQOL scores at final follow-up, and association between satisfaction and changes in sagittal profile were analyzed. A multivariate analysis was performed. No funds were received for this article.Results
Preoperatively, the spinal sagittal plane tended to exhibit kyphosis. Most sagittal parameters did not improve at final follow-up with respect to preoperative values. We saw, after univariate analysis, that worse sagittal profile leads to worse HRQOL, but after multivariate analysis, only spinal tilt (ST) persisted as possible predictor for worse SRS activity scores. Frontal Cobb significantly improved. Most patients (82%) were satisfied with final outcomes. Variations in sagittal profile parameters did not differ between satisfied and dissatisfied patients.Conclusions
Although most sagittal plane parameters did not improve after surgery, surgical treatment in AS achieves a high satisfaction rate. Good clinical results do not correlate with improving sagittal plane parameters. Sagittal profile measurements are not helpful to decide surgical treatment in patients with mainly frontal deformity. 相似文献6.
Background Context
Short-term readmission rates are becoming widely used as a quality and performance metric for hospitals. Data on unplanned short-term readmission after spine fusion for deformity in pediatric patients are limited.Purpose
To characterize the rate and risk factors for short-term readmission after spine fusion for deformity in pediatric patients.Study Design
This is a retrospective cohort study.Patient Sample
Data were obtained from the State Inpatient Database from New York, Utah, Nebraska, Florida, North Carolina (years 2006–2010), and California (years 2006–2011).Outcome Measures
Outcome measures included 30- and 90-day readmission rates.Materials and Methods
Inclusion criteria were patients aged 0–21 years, a primary diagnosis of spine deformity, and a primary 3+-level lumbar or thoracic fusion. Exclusion criteria included revision surgery at index admission and cervical fusion. Readmission rates were calculated and logistic analyses were used to identify independent predictors of readmission.Results
There were a total of 13,287 patients with a median age of 14 years. Sixty-seven percent were girls. The overall 30- and 90-day readmission rates were 4.7% and 6.1%. The most common reasons for readmission were infection (38% at 30 days and 33% at 90 days), wound dehiscence (19% and 17%), and pulmonary complications (12% and 13%). On multivariate analysis, predictors of 30-day readmission included male sex (p=.008), neuromuscular (p<.0001) or congenital scoliosis (p=.006), Scheuermann kyphosis (p=.003), Medicaid insurance (p<.0001), length of stay of ≤3 days or ≥6 days (p<.0001), and surgery at a teaching hospital (p=.011). Surgery at a hospital performing >80 operations/year was associated with a 34% reduced risk of 30-day readmission (95% confidence interval 12%-50%, p=.005) compared with hospitals performing <20 operations/year.Conclusions
The short-term readmission rate for pediatric spine deformity surgery is driven by patient-related factors, as well as several risk factors that may be modified to reduce this rate. 相似文献7.
E. Kyung Shin Chi Heon Kim Chun Kee Chung Yunhee Choi Dahae Yim Whei Jung Sung Bae Park Jung Hyeon Moon Won Heo Sung-Mi Kim 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):175-182
Background Context
Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) is the most common lumbar degenerative disease, and sagittal imbalance is uncommon. Forward-bending posture, which is primarily caused by buckling of the ligamentum flavum, may be improved via simple decompression surgery.Purpose
The objectives of this study were to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance and to describe the outcomes of simple decompression surgery.Study Design
This is a retrospective nested case-control studyPatient Sample
This was a retrospective study that included 83 consecutive patients (M:F=46:37; mean age, 68.5±7.7 years) who underwent decompression surgery and a minimum of 12 months of follow-up.Outcome Measures
The primary end point was normalization of sagittal imbalance after decompression surgery.Methods
Sagittal imbalance was defined as a C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) ≥40?mm on a 36-inch-long lateral whole spine radiograph. Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors for sagittal imbalance. Bilateral decompression was performed via a unilateral approach with a tubular retractor. The SVA was measured on serial radiographs performed 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The prognostic factors for sagittal balance recovery were determined based on various clinical and radiological parameters.Results
Sagittal imbalance was observed in 54% (45/83) of patients, and its risk factors were old age and a large mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis. The 1-year normalization rate was 73% after decompression surgery, and the median time to normalization was 1 to 3 months. Patients who did not experience SVA normalization exhibited low thoracic kyphosis (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02–1.10) (p<.01) and spondylolisthesis (HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17–0.61) before surgery.Conclusions
Sagittal imbalance was observed in more than 50% of LSS patients, but this imbalance was correctable via simple decompression surgery in 70% of patients. 相似文献8.
Joseph E. Tanenbaum Jacob A. Miller Vincent J. Alentado Daniel Lubelski Benjamin P. Rosenbaum Edward C. Benzel Thomas E. Mroz 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):62-69
Background Context
The incidence of adverse care quality events among patients undergoing cervical fusion surgery is unknown using the definition of care quality employed by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The effect of insurance status on the incidence of these adverse quality events is also unknown.Purpose
This study determined the incidence of hospital-acquired conditions (HAC) and patient safety indicators (PSI) in patients with cervical spine fusion and analyzed the association between primary payer status and these adverse events.Study Design
This is a retrospective cohort design.Patient Sample
All patients in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) aged 18 and older who underwent cervical spine fusion from 1998 to 2011 were included.Outcome Measures
Incidence of HAC and PSI from 1998 to 2011 served as outcome variables.Methods
We queried the NIS for all hospitalizations that included a cervical fusion during the inpatient episode from 1998 to 2011. All comparisons were made between privately insured patients and Medicaid or self-pay patients because Medicare enrollment is confounded with age. Incidence of nontraumatic HAC and PSI was determined using publicly available lists of International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. We built logistic regression models to determine the effect of primary payer status on PSI and nontraumatic HAC.Results
We identified 419,424 hospitalizations with cervical fusion performed during an inpatient episode. The estimated national incidences of nontraumatic HAC and PSI were 0.35% and 1.6%, respectively. After adjusting for patient demographics and hospital characteristics, Medicaid or self-pay patients had significantly greater odds of experiencing one or more HAC (odds ratio [OR] 1.51 95% conflict of interest [CI] 1.23–1.84) or PSI (OR 1.52 95% CI 1.37–1.70) than the privately insured cohort.Conclusions
Among patients undergoing inpatient cervical fusion, primary payer status predicts PSI and HAC (both indicators of adverse health-care quality used to determine hospital reimbursement by CMS). As the US health-care system transitions to a value-based payment model, the cause of these disparities must be studied to improve the quality of care delivered to vulnerable patient populations. 相似文献9.
Juan A. Sanchis-Gimeno Susanna Llido David Guede Francisco Martinez-Soriano Jose Ramon Caeiro Esther Blanco-Perez 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):431-434
Background Context
To date, no information about the cortical bone microstructural properties in atlas vertebrae with posterior arch defects has been reported.Purpose
To test if there is an increased cortical bone thickening in atlases with Type A posterior atlas arch defects in an experimental model.Study Design
Micro-computed tomography (CT) study on cadaveric atlas vertebrae.Methods
We analyzed the cortical bone thickness, the cortical volume, and the medullary volume (SkyScan 1172 Bruker micro-CT NV, Kontich, Belgium) in cadaveric dry vertebrae with a Type A atlas arch defect and normal control vertebrae.Results
The micro-CT study revealed significant differences in cortical bone thickness (p=.005), cortical volume (p=.003), and medullary volume (p=.009) values between the normal and the Type A vertebrae.Conclusions
Type A congenital atlas arch defects present a cortical bone thickening that may play a protective role against atlas fractures. 相似文献10.
Sureeporn Uthaikhup Jenjira Assapun Kanokwan Watcharasaksilp Gwendolen Jull 《The spine journal》2017,17(1):46-55
Background Context
A previous study demonstrated that in seniors, the presence of cervical musculoskeletal impairment was not specific to cervicogenic headache but was present in various recurrent headache types. Physiotherapy treatment is indicated in those seniors diagnosed with cervicogenic headache but could also be adjunct treatment for those with cervical musculoskeletal signs who are suspected of having transitional headaches.Purpose
This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of a physiotherapy program for seniors with recurrent headaches associated with neck pain and cervical musculoskeletal dysfunction, irrespective of the headache classification.Study Design
This is a prospective, stratified, randomized controlled trial with blinded outcome assessment.Patient Sample
Sixty-five participants with recurrent headache, aged 50–75 years, were randomly assigned to either a physiotherapy (n=33) or a usual care group (n=32).Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was headache frequency. Secondary outcomes were headache intensity and duration, neck pain and disability, cervical range of motion, quality of life, participant satisfaction, and medication intake.Methods
Participants in the physiotherapy group received 14 treatment sessions. Participants in the usual care group continued with their usual care. Outcome measures were recorded at baseline, 11 weeks, 6 months, and 9 months. This study was funded by a government research fund of $6,850. No conflict of interest is declared.Results
There was no loss to follow-up for the primary outcome measure. Compared with usual care, participants receiving physiotherapy reported significant reductions in headache frequency immediately after treatment (mean difference ?1.6 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] ?2.5 to ?0.6), at 6-month follow-up (?1.7 days, 95% CI ?2.6 to ?0.8), and at 9-month follow-up (?2.4 days, 95% CI ?3.2 to ?1.5), and significant improvements in all secondary outcomes immediately posttreatment and at 6- and 9-month follow-ups, (p<.05 for all). No adverse events were reported.Conclusions
Physiotherapy treatment provided benefits over usual care for seniors with recurrent headache associated with neck pain and dysfunction. 相似文献11.
Hwee Weng Dennis Hey Chengyuan Gordon Wong Eugene Tze-Chun Lau Kimberly-Anne Tan Leok-Lim Lau Ka-Po Gabriel Liu Hee-Kit Wong 《The spine journal》2017,17(2):183-189
Background Context
Sitting spinal alignment is increasingly recognized as a factor influencing strategy for deformity correction. Considering that most individuals sit for longer hours in a “slumped” rather than in an erect posture, greater understanding of the natural sitting posture is warranted.Purpose
This study aimed to investigate the differences in sagittal spinal alignment between two common sitting postures: a natural, patient-preferred posture; and an erect, investigator-controlled posture that is commonly used in alignment studies.Design/Setting
This is a randomized, prospective study of 28 young, healthy patients seen in a tertiary hospital over a 6-month period.Patient Sample
Twenty-eight patients (24 men, 4 women), with a mean age of 24 years (range 19–38), were recruited for this study. All patients with first episode of lower back pain of less than 3 months' duration were included. The exclusion criteria consisted of previous spinal surgery, radicular symptoms, red flag symptoms, previous spinal trauma, obvious spinal deformity on forward bending test, significant personal or family history of malignancy, and current pregnancy.Outcome Measures
Radiographic measurements included sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracolumbar angle (TL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and cervical lordosis (CL). Standard spinopelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt [PT], and sacral slope) and sagittal apex and end vertebrae were also measured.Methods
Basic patient demographics (age, gender, ethnicity) were recorded. Lateral sitting whole spine radiographs were obtained using a slot scanner in the imposed erect and the natural sitting posture. Statistical analyses of the radiographical parameters were performed comparing the two sitting postures using chi-squared tests for categorical variables and paired t tests for continuous variables.Results
There was forward SVA shift between the two sitting postures by a mean of 2.9?cm (p<.001). There was a significant increase in CL by a mean of 11.62° (p<.001), and TL kyphosis by a mean of 11.48° (p<.001), as well as a loss of LL by a mean of 21.26° (p<.001). The mean PT increased by 17.68° (p<.001). The entire thoracic and lumbar spine has the tendency to form a single C-shaped curve with the apex moving to L1 (p=.002) vertebra in the majority of patients.Conclusions
In a natural sitting posture, the lumbar spine becomes kyphotic and contributes to a single C-shaped sagittal profile comprising the thoracic and the lumbar spine. This is associated with an increase in CL and PT, as well as a constant SVA. These findings lend insight into the body's natural way of energy conservation using the posterior ligamentous tension band while achieving sitting spinal sagittal balance. It also provides information on one of the possible causes of proximal junctional kyphosis or proximal junctional failure. 相似文献12.
Dustin B. Wygant Paul A. Arbisi Kevin J. Bianchini Robert L. Umlauf 《The spine journal》2017,17(4):505-510
Background Context
Waddell et al. identified a set of eight non-organic signs in 1980. There has been controversy about their meaning, particularly with respect to their use as validity indicators.Purpose
The current study examined the Waddell signs in relation to measures of somatic amplification or over-reporting in a sample of outpatient chronic pain patients. We examined the degree to which these signs were associated with measures of over-reporting.Study Design/Setting
This study examined scores on the Waddell signs in relation to over-reporting indicators in an outpatient chronic pain sample.Patient Sample
We examined 230 chronic pain patients treated at a multidisciplinary pain clinic. The majority of these patients presented with primary back or spinal injuries.Outcome Measures
The outcome measures used in the study were Waddell signs, Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, Pain Disability Index, and the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form.Methods
We examined Waddell signs using multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and analysis of variance (ANOVA), receiver operating characteristic analysis, classification accuracy, and relative risk ratios.Results
Multivariate analysis of variance and ANOVA showed a significant association between Waddell signs and somatic amplification. Classification analyses showed increased odds of somatic amplification at a Waddell score of 2 or 3.Conclusions
Our results found significant evidence of an association between Waddell signs and somatic over-reporting. Elevated scores on the Waddell signs (particularly scores higher than 2 and 3) were associated with increased odds of exhibiting somatic over-reporting. 相似文献13.
Minji K. Lee Kathleen J. Yost Jennifer S. McDonald Ryne W. Dougherty Roanna L. Vine David F. Kallmes 《The spine journal》2017,17(6):821-829
Background Context
The majority of validation done on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) has been in patients with mild or moderate disability. There is paucity of research focusing on the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Purpose
To evaluate the psychometric quality of the RMDQ in patients with severe disability.Study Design/Setting
Observational clinical study.Sample
The sample consisted of 214 patients with painful vertebral compression fractures who underwent vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty.Outcome Measures
The 23-item version of the RMDQ was completed at two time points: baseline and 30-day postintervention follow-up.Methods
With the two-parameter logistic unidimensional item response theory (IRT) analyses, we derived the range of scores that produced reliable measurement and investigated the minimal clinically important difference (MCID).Results
Scores for 214 (100%) patients at baseline and 108 (50%) patients at follow-up did not meet the reliability criterion of 0.90 or higher, with the majority of patients having disability due to back pain that was too severe to be reliably measured by the RMDQ. Depending on methodology, MCID estimates ranged from 2 to 8 points and the proportion of patients classified as having experienced meaningful improvement ranged from 26% to 68%. A greater change in score was needed at the extreme ends of the score scale to be classified as having achieved MCID using IRT methods.Conclusions
Replacing items measuring moderate disability with items measuring severe disability could yield a version of the RMDQ that better targets patients with severe disability due to back pain. Improved precision in measuring disability would be valuable to clinicians who treat patients with greater functional impairments. Caution is needed when choosing criteria for interpreting meaningful change using the RMDQ. 相似文献14.
Aaron J. Buckland Subaraman Ramchandran Louis Day Shay Bess Themistocles Protopsaltis Peter G. Passias Bassel G. Diebo Renaud Lafage Virginie Lafage Akhila Sure Thomas J. Errico 《The spine journal》2017,17(11):1601-1610
Background Context
Patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) adopt a forward flexed posture in an attempt to decompress neural elements. The relationship between sagittal alignment and severity of lumbar stenosis has not previously been studied.Purpose
We hypothesized that patients with increasing radiological severity of lumbar stenosis will exhibit worsening sagittal alignment.Study Design
This is a cross-sectional study.Patient Sample
Our sample consists of patients who have DLS.Outcome Measures
Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity and global sagittal alignment, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were the outcome measures.Methods
Patients with DLS were identified from a retrospective clinical database with corresponding full-body stereoradiographs. Exclusion criteria included coronal malalignment, prior spine surgery, spondylolisthesis>Grade 1, non-degenerative spinal pathology, or skeletal immaturity. Central stenosis severity was graded on axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from L1–S1. Foraminal stenosis and supine lordosis was graded on sagittal T1-weighted images. Standing pelvic, regional, lower extremity, and global sagittal alignment were measured using validated software. The HRQoL measures were also analyzed in relation to severity of stenosis.Results
A total of 125 patients were identified with DLS on appropriate imaging. As central stenosis grade increased, patients displayed significantly increasing standing T1 pelvic angle, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, and pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (p<.05). No significant difference wasfound in pelvic incidence, supine lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, or T1 spinopelvic inclination between central stenosis groups. Despite similar supine lordosis between stenosis groups, patients with Grades 2 and 3 stenosis had less standing lordosis, suggesting antalgic posturing. Upper lumbar (L1–L3) stenosis predicted worse alignment than lower lumbar (L4–S1) stenosis.Increasing severity of foraminal stenosis was associated with reduced lumbar lordosis; however, no significant postural difference in lordosis, thoracolumbar, or lower extremity compensatory mechanisms were noted between foraminal stenosis groups. Stenosis grading did not predict worsening HRQoLs in central or foraminal stenosis.Conclusions
Severity of central lumbar stenosis as graded on MRI correlates with severity of sagittal malalignment. These findings support theories of sagittal malalignment as a compensatory mechanism for central lumbar stenosis. 相似文献15.
Daniel D. Bohl Fady Y. Hijji Dustin H. Massel Benjamin C. Mayo William W. Long Krishna D. Modi Ankur S. Narain Blaine T. Manning Junyoung Ahn Philip K. Louie Kern Singh 《The spine journal》2017,17(3):305-312
Background Context
Spine surgeons employ a high volume of imaging in the diagnosis and evaluation of spinal pathology. However, little is known regarding patients' knowledge of the radiation exposure associated with these imaging techniques.Purpose
To characterize spine patients' knowledge regarding radiation exposure from various imaging modalities.Study Design/Setting
A cross-sectional survey study.Patient Sample
One hundred patients at their first clinic visit with a single spine surgeon at an urban institution.Outcome Measures
The primary outcome was patient estimate of radiation dose for various common spinal imaging modalities as compared with true dose.Methods
An electronic survey was administered to all new patients before their first appointment with a single spinal surgeon. The survey asked patients to estimate how many chest x-rays (CXRs) worth of radiation were equivalent to various common spinal imaging modalities. Patient estimates were compared to true effective radiation doses determined from the literature. The survey also asked patients whether they would consider avoiding types of imaging modalities out of concern for excessive radiation exposure.Results
Patients accurately approximated the radiation associated with two views of the cervical spine, with a median estimate of 3.5 CXRs, compared with an actual value of 4.7 CXRs. However, patients underestimated the dose for computed tomography (CT) scans of the cervical spine (2.0 CXRs vs. 145.3 CXRs), two views of the lumbar spine (3.0 CXRs vs. 123.3 CXRs), and CT scans of the lumbar spine (2.0 CXRs vs. 638.3 CXRs). The majority of patients believed that there is at least some radiation exposure associated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The percent of patients who would consider forgoing imaging recommend by their surgeon out of concern for radiation exposure was 14% for x-rays, 13% for CT scans, and 9% for MRI.Conclusion
These results demonstrate a lack of patient understanding regarding radiation exposure associated with common spinal imaging techniques. These data suggest that patients might benefit from increased counseling and/or educational materials regarding radiation exposure before undergoing diagnostic imaging of the cervical or lumbar spine. 相似文献16.
Hideki Shigematsu Masahiko Kawaguchi Hironobu Hayashi Tsunenori Takatani Eiichiro Iwata Masato Tanaka Akinori Okuda Yasuhiko Morimoto Keisuke Masuda Yuu Tanaka Yasuhito Tanaka 《The spine journal》2017,17(10):1472-1479
Background Context
During spine surgery, the spinal cord is electrophysiologically monitored via transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) to prevent injury. Transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potential involves the use of either constant-current or constant-voltage stimulation; however, there are few comparative data available regarding their ability to adequately elicit compound motor action potentials. We hypothesized that the success rates of TES-MEP recordings would be similar between constant-current and constant-voltage stimulations in patients undergoing spine surgery.Purpose
The objective of this study was to compare the success rates of TES-MEP recordings between constant-current and constant-voltage stimulation.Study Design
This is a prospective, within-subject study.Patient Sample
Data from 100 patients undergoing spinal surgery at the cervical, thoracic, or lumbar level were analyzed.Outcome Measures
The success rates of the TES-MEP recordings from each muscle were examined.Materials and Methods
Transcranial electrical stimulation with constant-current and constant-voltage stimulations at the C3 and C4 electrode positions (international “10–20” system) was applied to each patient. Compound muscle action potentials were bilaterally recorded from the abductor pollicis brevis (APB), deltoid (Del), abductor hallucis (AH), tibialis anterior (TA), gastrocnemius (GC), and quadriceps (Quad) muscles.Results
The success rates of the TES-MEP recordings from the right Del, right APB, bilateral Quad, right TA, right GC, and bilateral AH muscles were significantly higher using constant-voltage stimulation than those using constant-current stimulation. The overall success rates with constant-voltage and constant-current stimulations were 86.3% and 68.8%, respectively (risk ratio 1.25 [95% confidence interval: 1.20–1.31]).Conclusions
The success rates of TES-MEP recordings were higher using constant-voltage stimulation compared with constant-current stimulation in patients undergoing spinal surgery. 相似文献17.
Michael K. Urban Kara Fields Sean W. Donegan Jonathan C. Beathe David W. Pinter Oheneba Boachie-Adjei Ronald G. Emerson 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1889-1896
Background Context
Lidocaine has emerged as a useful adjuvant anesthetic agent for cases requiring intraoperative monitoring of motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) and somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEPs). A previous retrospective study suggested that lidocaine could be used as a component of propofol-based intravenous anesthesia without adversely affecting MEP or SSEP monitoring, but did not address the effect of the addition of lidocaine on the MEP and SSEP signals of individual patients.Purpose
The purpose of this study was to examine the intrapatient effects of the addition of lidocaine to balanced anesthesia on MEPs and SSEPs during multilevel posterior spinal fusion.Study Design
This is a prospective, two-treatment, two-period crossover randomized controlled trial with a blinded primary outcome assessment.Patient Sample
Forty patients undergoing multilevel posterior spinal fusion were studied.Outcome Measures
The primary outcome measures were MEP voltage thresholds and SSEP amplitudes. Secondary outcome measures included isoflurane concentrations and hemodynamic parameters.Methods
Each participant received two anesthetic treatments (propofol 50?mcg/kg/h and propofol 25?mcg/kg/h+lidocaine 1?mg/kg/h) along with isoflurane, ketamine, and diazepam. In this manner, each patient served as his or her own control. The order of administration of the two treatments was determined randomly.Results
There were no significant within-patient differences between MEP threshold voltages or SSEP amplitudes during the two anesthetic treatments.Conclusions
Lidocaine may be used as a component of balanced anesthesia during multilevel spinal fusions without adversely affecting the monitoring of SSEPs or MEPs in individual patients. 相似文献18.
Sabina R. Blizzard Bala Krishnamoorthy Matthew Shinseki Marcel Betsch Jung Yoo 《The spine journal》2017,17(12):1859-1865
Background Context
Although it is generally believed that the magnitude of dens fracture displacement is proportional to the amount of force applied to the cervical spine during injury, the factors responsible for displacement have not been studied.Purpose
Our aim was to determine factors that contribute to horizontal and angular displacement of dens fractures.Study Design/Setting
We conducted a retrospective review of adult patients who were admitted to our level 1 trauma center between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2013.Patient Sample
Angular and horizontal displacements of the fractured dens in 57 patients were measured. Subjects were grouped based on mechanism of fracture: motor vehicle accident, ground level fall, and higher falls.Outcome Measures
Cervical lordosis was measured between C2 and T1. C3–C4, C4–C5, C5–C6, and C6–C7 disc inclination angles were measured. Anteroposterior sagittal balance was assessed by comparing the sagittal position of the C2 body with the C7 body.Methods
Data were analyzed using Pearson correlations, independent t tests, and support vector regression to construct predictive models that determine factors contributing to the angular and horizontal displacements.Results
The mean horizontal displacement of the fractured dens was not significantly different among groups. However, the dens in those with ground level falls had a significantly greater mean fracture angle compared with the higher energy trauma groups (p=.01). There were positive correlations between angular displacement and C5–C6 disc space inclination angle (r=0.67, p<.01) and C6–C7 disc space inclination angle (r=0.61, p<.01). There were positive correlations between horizontal displacement and C6–C7 inclination angle (r=0.40, p<.01) and sagittal alignment (r=0.32, p<.01). The predictive model using all variables demonstrated that angular fracture displacement was only dependent on C5–C6 disc space inclination angle. Horizontal displacement was only dependent on C6–C7 inclination angle and anteroposterior sagittal balance.Conclusions
Disc space inclination angles of the lower cervical spine and the cervical sagittal balance most contribute to the magnitude of angular and horizontal displacement of the dens after fracture. 相似文献19.
Antonio Caronni Luciana Sciumè Sabrina Donzelli Fabio Zaina Stefano Negrini 《The spine journal》2017,17(9):1364-1372
Background Context
Spinal deformities are commonly associated with poor health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Several questionnaires (eg, Scoliosis Research Society-24 [SRS-24] and Scoliosis Research Society-22 [SRS-22]) have been developed to evaluate HRQOL in these conditions. In adults as well as during growth, the HRQOL is considered one of the most relevant outcomes of both conservative and surgical treatments. Rasch analysis is a powerful statistical technique for developing high-quality and valid questionnaires. The SRS-24 and SRS-22 have been evaluated using the Rasch analysis but showed poor measurement properties. Thus, a proper measure of HRQOL in people with a spine condition is still missing.Purpose
This study aimed to develop a new questionnaire that is totally Rasch consistent for measuring the HRQOL in young people with a spine condition.Study Design
This is a cross-sectional study for developing a new HRQOL measure.Patient Sample
A total of 402 participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis or Scheuermann juvenile kyphosis were included in the study.Outcome Measure
The outcome measure used was the Italian Spine Youth Quality of Life (ISYQOL) questionnaire.Materials and Methods
The study consisted of different stages: a conventional approach content analysis, an opinion poll among clinicians trained in spine deformities, and the Rasch analysis (partial credit model).Results
The Rasch analysis showed that all items of the ISYQOL questionnaire had ordered thresholds and a good fit to the model. Differential item functioning was present for Item 1, with bracing only, and was solved with a conventional items splitting procedure. The ISYQOL item map spans an adequate range of HRQOL. The principal component analysis for Rasch residuals showed, in practical terms, the ISYQOL unidimensionality. The reliability of ISYQOL was high enough so that approximately three significantly different levels of HRQOL could be discerned. Two questionnaire versions were provided for patients with and without the brace, respectively.Conclusions
ISYQOL is the first HRQOL questionnaire developed according to the Rasch analysis. It was developed in a conservative treatment setting for all types of spinal deformities, including also patients with surgical curves. Validation in many languages is already under way. 相似文献20.
Jean-Marc Mac-Thiong Sameh Ibrahim Stefan Parent Hubert Labelle 《The spine journal》2017,17(5):663-670