南丁格尔奖获得者学术影响力的研究意义

介绍了南丁格尔、南丁格尔奖、南丁格尔奖获得者、获得者学术影响力的研究现状，以及研究南丁格尔奖获得者学术影响力对我国护理学科发展、护理学术水平提高和护理精英培养的积极意义？提出对南丁格尔奖获得者学术影响力的研究将促进我国护理学科的发展。     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者论文合作的社会网络分析

[目的]在前期对南丁格尔奖获得者论文合作作者关系研究的基础上,拟用社会网络分析方法对其论文进行社会网络分析,以期为我国护理学发展提供更多的参考依据。[方法]以68名南丁格尔奖获得者的姓名、工作单位为检索条件,在知网和万方数据库进行3次检索,运用社会网络分析方法对我国南丁格尔奖获得者论文合作的整体网络、网络密度及中心性进行分析。[结果]我国南丁格尔奖获得者的论文合作以机构内小团体合作为主;整体网络和各小团体网络密度均较低;南丁格尔奖获得者未处于论文合作网络核心地位。[结论]提示应注意南丁格尔奖评选标准的时代局限性,注重学术创新在护理学科带头人内在素质上的体现。     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响关系研究

[目的]探讨我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响关系。[方法]采用定性与定量相结合方法分析我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响的关系。[结果]定量研究结果与定性研究结果不存在相关关系,相关系数为-0.2(P=0.198)。[结论]我国护理工作者之所以获得南丁格尔奖,主要取决于以护理学科体制化贡献为主的社会影响力。     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响关系研究

[目的]探讨我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响关系。[方法]采用定性与定量相结合方法分析我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出与社会影响的关系。[结果]定量研究结果与定性研究结果不存在相关关系，相关系数为-0．2（P=0．198）。[结论]我国护理工作者之所以获得南丁格尔奖，主要取决于以护理学科体制化贡献为主的社会影响力。     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出分析

[目的]分析我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出情况,探讨影响获得者科技产出的因素.[方法]选取我国43位南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出资料,运用科学计量方法进行分析统计.[结果]我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前的科技产出数量和质量都偏低.[结论]南丁格尔奖遴选章程中科技产出权重不够以及我国的社会环境、护理学发展水平、护理人力资源配备均是影响获奖者获奖前科技产出的主要原因.     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者一般成因研究

[目的]总结我国南丁格尔奖获得者空间、年龄、学历学位、专业技术职称与学术职务的分布特征。[方法]采用文献分析法进行研究。[结果]我国南丁格尔奖获得者集中在人口密集、交通便利、文化底蕴深厚和经济发达的区域;年龄27岁～81岁,有年轻化和获奖人数逐年增多的趋势;中专学历占69.77%;58.14%获奖者拥有高级专业技术职称;60.47%担任过学会理事或秘书,均担任过管理职务。[结论]我国南丁格尔奖获得者具有较长的护理工作年限,具有所处时代层次较高的学历,具有高级专业技术职称,具有一定的护理学术或管理职务,工作地区具有人口密集、交通便利、文化底蕴深厚和经济繁荣的地理优势。     

《护理研究》2007年第21卷上旬版总目次

专题报告厚积薄发话沧桑继往开来铸辉煌———庆祝《护理研究》创刊20周年《护理研究》编辑部韩世范(9A:3)………………………………………………………………庆祝《护理研究》创刊20周年暨全国护理新理论新技术研讨会会议纪要……………………………《护理研究》编辑部程金莲(9A:6)专题笔谈我国南丁格尔奖获得者群体特征分析……段志光,孙娜(9A:2257)我国南丁格尔奖获得者一般成因研究……孙娜,段志光(9A:2259)我国南丁格尔奖获得者社会成因分析……孙娜,段志光(9A:2261)我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出分析王倩,段志光(9A:2263)……     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出分析

[目的]分析我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出情况，探讨影响获得者科技产出的因素。[方法]选取我国43位南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前科技产出资料，运用科学计量方法进行分析统计。[结果]我国南丁格尔奖获得者获奖前的科技产出数量和质量都偏低。[结论]南丁格尔奖遴选章程中科技产出权重不够以及我国的社会环境、护理学发展水平、护理人力资源配备均是影响获奖者获奖前科技产出的主要原因。     

我国南丁格尔奖获得者一般成因研究

[目的]总结我国南丁格尔奖获得者空间、年龄、学历学位、专业技术职称与学术职务的分布特征。[方法]采用文献分析法进行研究。[结果]我国南丁格尔奖获得者集中在人口密集、交通便利、文化底蕴深厚和经济发达的区域；年龄27岁-81岁，有年轻化和获奖人数逐年增多的趋势；中专学历占69．77％；58．14％获奖者拥有高级专业技术职称；60．47％担任过学会理事或秘书，均担任过管理职务。[结论]我国南丁格尔奖获得者具有较长的护理工作年限，具有所处时代层次较高的学历，具有高级专业技术职称，具有一定的护理学术或管理职务，工作地区具有人口密集、交通便利、文化底蕴深厚和经济繁荣的地理优势。     

中国南丁格尔教育馆开馆

正43届南丁格尔奖获得者、中国南丁格尔教育馆名誉馆长吴欣娟,海军军医大学教授、中国南丁格尔教育馆馆长姜安丽,44届南丁格尔奖获得者成翼娟女士、35届南丁格尔奖获得者邹瑞芳、42届南丁格尔奖获得者潘美儿共同为南丁格尔铜像揭幕     

中国南丁格尔奖获得者的社会学特征分析

目的通过分析和研究我国南丁格尔奖章获得者的社会学特征，弘扬南丁格尔精神，为我国护理事业发展提供精神导向。方法 平面媒体与电子媒体相结合收集有关南丁格尔奖章获得者的性别、学历、护龄、获奖年龄、所在省份、所在单位和突出成绩等资料并对其甄别、梳理和统计。结果（1）从第29届（1983年）我国参加南丁格尔奖章评选工作，至今（第41届，2007年）有48名护理工作者获得南丁格尔奖章。（2）获奖者中，藏族2名，满族1名，汉族45名；女性47名，男性1名；获奖时年龄（59．13±11．62）岁，护龄（38．88±11．25）年。（3）获奖者中，原始学历本科者2名，中专者46名。（4）46名获奖者担任或曾担任过护理行政职务。（5）获奖者所在地区分布于我国24个省。结论（1）危难时刻是考验护理人员弘扬南丁格尔精神的试金石；（2）南丁格尔奖章将向年轻、普通临床一线护士倾斜；（3）未来将会有更多高学历者获奖；（4）我国南丁格尔奖章比较关注欠发达地区。     

The life and impact of Florence Nightingale.

All nurses learn about Florence Nightingale sometime during their academic studies. Miss Nightingale, even though she lived over a century ago, still impacts current nursing care. This article provides a brief biographical review of her life and her impact on present day patient care.     

丹麦护理历史博物馆

丹麦护理历史博物馆开创于1999年,是世界三大护理博物馆之一,其面积大于英国伦敦南丁格尔博物馆,内容也不局限于某个历史人物,而是以护理历史发展的时间脉络为主线,扩展到护理学科的进展。馆内分16个区域,展出物品有海报、照片、原始档案、文件、实物模型。展出的形式包含护理历史和各专科发展,如人道救援、精神科护理、社区护理、护理教育、护理处置和病房情景模拟等,其意义更具现代性。     

Lamp light on leadership: clinical leadership and Florence Nightingale

stanley d. & sherratt a. (2010) Journal of Nursing Management  18, 115–121
Lamp light on leadership: clinical leadership and Florence Nightingale Aims The purpose of the present study was to use the example of Florence Nightingales’ nursing experience to highlight the differences between nursing leadership and clinical leadership with a focus on Miss Nightingales’ clinical leadership attributes. Background 2010 marks the centenary of the death of Florence Nightingale. As this significant date approaches this paper reflects on her contribution to nursing in relation to more recent insights into clinical leadership. Evaluation Literature has been used to explore issues related to nursing leadership, clinical leadership and the life and characteristics of Florence Nightingale. Key issues There are a few parts of Florence’s character which fit the profile of a clinical leader. However, Miss Nightingale was not a clinical leader she was a powerful and successful role model for the academic, political and managerial domains of nursing. Conclusion There are other ways to lead and other types of leaders and leadership that nursing and the health service needs to foster, discover and recognize. Implications for nursing management Clinical leaders should be celebrated and recognized in their own right. Both clinical leaders and nursing leaders are important and need to work collaboratively to enhance patient care and to positively enhance the profession of nursing.     

The challenge of achieving interprofessional collaboration: Should we blame Nightingale?

The goal of implementing true interprofessional collaboration within the health care system seems to be elusive. The historical role of medicine as primary clinical leader and decision maker is particularly entrenched in the Western health care system. Florence Nightingale, the acknowledged founder of modern, Western nursing, is often blamed for the subservient role of nursing and other female-dominated health and social care professions. Is it fair to lay the blame on Nightingale? This paper seeks to place Nightingale in context and to revisit her own words to explore the Victorian world in which she worked as a social reformer. It argues that Nightingale made pragmatic compromises to gain acceptance for the new profession of nursing; that these compromises had unanticipated consequences that persist – but are not unchangeable.     

The voice of Florence Nightingale on advocacy

Modern nursing is complex, ever changing, and multi focused. Since the time of Florence Nightingale, however, the goal of nursing has remained unchanged, namely to provide a safe and caring environment that promotes patient health and well being. Effective use of an interpersonal tool, such as advocacy, enhances the care-giving environment. Nightingale used advocacy early and often in the development of modern nursing. By reading her many letters and publications that have survived, it is possible to identify her professional goals and techniques. Specifically, Nightingale valued egalitarian human rights and developed leadership principles and practices that provide useful advocacy techniques for nurses practicing in the 21st century. In this article we will review the accomplishments of Florence Nightingale, discuss advocacy in nursing and show how Nightingale used advocacy through promoting both egalitarian human rights and leadership activities. We will conclude by exploring how Nightingale's advocacy is as relevant for the 21st century as it was for the 19th century.     

我国护理学期刊近10年学术影响力分析

目的 从总被引频次和影响因子角度,定量分析我国护理学期刊学术影响力变化趋势。方法 采用文献计量法、比较研究法,统计《中国科技期刊引证报告》（CJCR）核心版近10年收录护理学期刊的总被引频次和影响因子最大值、最小值和平均值等。结果 CJCR核心版收录的护理学期刊总被引频次平均值年代变化从2000年的230上升到2009年2965;影响因子平均值从2000年的0.1735上升到2009年的0.5621;高影响力（影响因子≥1.0）期刊数量基本没变,所占百分比渐小。结论 我国护理学期刊质量和数量均逐年提高,且增长速度较快;学术影响力呈上升趋势,但仍然较弱,需加大期刊建设力度和提高护理人员的科研能力,以促进护理学科的纵深发展。     

The challenge of achieving interprofessional collaboration: Should we blame Nightingale?

The goal of implementing true interprofessional collaboration within the health care system seems to be elusive. The historical role of medicine as primary clinical leader and decision maker is particularly entrenched in the Western health care system. Florence Nightingale, the acknowledged founder of modern, Western nursing, is often blamed for the subservient role of nursing and other female-dominated health and social care professions. Is it fair to lay the blame on Nightingale? This paper seeks to place Nightingale in context and to revisit her own words to explore the Victorian world in which she worked as a social reformer. It argues that Nightingale made pragmatic compromises to gain acceptance for the new profession of nursing; that these compromises had unanticipated consequences that persist - but are not unchangeable.