Internal low energy atrial cardioversion: efficacy and safety in older patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND: Low-energy internal atrial cardioversion is a relatively new technique based on delivery of intracardiac shocks through transvenous catheters placed into the atria or the vessels. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess in older and younger patients with chronic persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) the efficacy and safety of transvenous low-energy internal atrial cardioversion performed without routine administration of sedatives or anesthetics. DESIGN: A prospective longitudinal study. SETTING: A cardiological university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 82 patients, divided into older (> or = 60 years) (n = 49) and younger (n = 33) subjects. MEASUREMENTS: Atrial defibrillation threshold for internal cardioversion, measured as leading edge voltage (V) and delivered energy (J) of effective shocks, percentage of patients maintaining sinus rhythm at short-term (within 3 days) and at long-term follow-up. METHODS: Patients with chronic persistent AF, treated with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 to 4 weeks, were admitted to hospital. Following a clinical work-up, patients were subjected to low-energy internal atrial cardioversion with shock delivery according to a step-up protocol. RESULTS: Internal cardioversion was effective in restoring sinus rhythm in 90% (44/49) of the older patients and in 94% (31/33) of the younger patients. Shocks were effective at a mean energy between 6 and 8 joules (range 0.9-23) and administration of sedatives or anesthetics was required during the procedure in 22% (11/49) of older and in 48% (16/33) of younger patients (P = .026 at chi-square). No major complications occurred during the procedure. Pharmacological prophylaxis of AF recurrences was instituted immediately following the procedure. During inhospital stay and during the follow-up (mean 12 +/- 9 months for older patients and 15 +/- 10 months for younger patients), AF recurred in 39% (17/44) of older patients and in 16% (5/31) of younger subjects (P = .064 at chi-square). CONCLUSIONS: Internal low energy cardioversion is a very effective procedure for restoring sinus rhythm in patients with AF; it can be performed in older patients, and administration of sedatives or anesthetics can be avoided or minimized in a substantial proportion of subjects. Recurrences of AF in the long term tend to be higher in older subjects and intensive prophylaxis with antiarrhythmic drugs is required.     

Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized,double-blind multicenter trial

OBJECTIVES: This study compared a biphasic waveform with a conventional monophasic waveform for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: Biphasic shock waveforms have been demonstrated to be superior to monophasic shocks for termination of ventricular fibrillation, but data regarding biphasic shocks for conversion of AF are still emerging. METHODS: In an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, we compared the effectiveness of damped sine wave monophasic versus impedance-compensated truncated exponential biphasic shocks for the cardioversion of AF. Patients received up to five shocks, as necessary for conversion: 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, a fourth shock at maximum output for the initial waveform (200 J biphasic, 360 J monophasic) and a final cross-over shock at maximum output of the alternate waveform. RESULTS: Analysis included 107 monophasic and 96 biphasic patients. The success rate was higher for biphasic than for monophasic shocks at each of the three shared energy levels (100 J: 60% vs. 22%, p < 0.0001; 150 J: 77% vs. 44%, p < 0.0001; 200 J: 90% vs. 53%, p < 0.0001). Through four shocks, at a maximum of 200 J, biphasic performance was similar to monophasic performance at 360 J (91% vs. 85%, p = 0.29). Biphasic patients required fewer shocks (1.7 +/- 1.0 vs. 2.8 +/- 1.2, p < 0.0001) and lower total energy delivered (217 +/- 176 J vs. 548 +/- 331 J, p < 0.0001). The biphasic shock waveform was also associated with a lower frequency of dermal injury (17% vs. 41%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: For the cardioversion of AF, a biphasic shock waveform has greater efficacy, requires fewer shocks and lower delivered energy, and results in less dermal injury than a monophasic shock waveform.     

Impact of biphasic electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on early recurrent atrial fibrillation and shock efficacy

INTRODUCTION: Early recurrent atrial fibrillation (ERAF) after external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) occurs in 12% to 26% of patients. Whether biphasic cardioversion has an impact on the incidence of ERAF after cardioversion of AF is unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients (n = 216, mean age 66 years, 71% male, 88% with structural cardiovascular disease or hypertension) underwent cardioversion with a biphasic (Bi) or monophasic (Mo) shock waveform in randomized fashion. Energies used were 120-150-200-200 Ws (Bi) or 200-300-360-360 Ws (Mo). The two study groups (Bi vs Mo) did not differ with regard to age, sex, body mass index, underlying cardiovascular disease, left atrial diameter, left ventricular ejection fraction, duration of AF fibrillation, and antiarrhythmic drug therapy. Mean delivered energy was significantly lower in the Bi group (Bi: 186 +/- 143 Ws vs Mo: 324 +/- 227 Ws; P < 0.001). Overall incidence of ERAF (AF relapse within 1 minute after successful cardioversion) was 8.9% and showed no difference between the two groups (Bi: 8.1% vs Mo: 9.7%, P = NS). Cardioversion was successful in 95.4% of patients. The success rate was comparable in both groups (Bi: 94.3% vs Mo 96.8%; P = NS). First shock efficacy did not differ between Bi and Mo (76.4% vs 67.7%; P = NS). Mean number of shocks were 1.4 shocks per patient in both groups. CONCLUSION: Biphasic cardioversion allows comparable success rates with significantly lower energies. However, the incidence of ERAF is not influenced by biphasic cardioversion. With the energies used, biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms are comparable with regard to first shock and cumulative shock efficacy.     

A trial of self-adhesive patch electrodes and hand-held paddle electrodes for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (MOBIPAPA).

AIMS: External electrical cardioversion is the method of choice to terminate persistent atrial fibrillation. Whether the type of shock electrode affects cardioversion success is not known. We tested whether hand-held steel electrodes improve cardioversion outcome with monophasic or biphasic shocks when compared with adhesive patch electrodes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Two hundred and one consecutive patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (147 male, mean age 63+/-1 years, duration of atrial fibrillation 6.3+/-1 months) were randomly assigned to cardioversion using either a sinusoidal monophasic or a truncated exponential biphasic shock wave form. The first half of patients were cardioverted using adhesive patch electrodes, the second half using hand-held steel paddle electrodes, and all patients using an anterior-posterior electrode position. Paddle electrodes successfully cardioverted 100/104 patients (96%) and patch electrodes 85/97 patients (88%, P=0.04). This effect was comparable to that of biphasic shocks: biphasic shocks cardioverted 102/104 patients (98%) and monophasic shocks 83/97 patients (86%, P=0.001). A beneficial effect of paddle electrodes was observed for both shock wave forms. After cross-over from an ineffective monophasic to a biphasic shock, cardioversion was successful in 198/201 (98.5%) patients. Unsuccessful cardioversion after cross-over (3/201 patients) only occurred with patch electrodes (P=0.07). CONCLUSION: Hand-held paddle electrodes increase success of external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in this trial. This increase is of similar magnitude as the increase in cardioversion success achieved with biphasic shocks. A combination of biphasic shocks, paddle electrodes, and an anterior-posterior electrode position renders outcome of external cardioversion almost always successful (104/104 patients in this trial).     

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: comparison of biphasic vs monophasic waveform shocks.

AIMS: It is well established in transthoracic ventricular defibrillation that biphasic truncated waveform shocks are associated with superior defibrillation efficacy when compared with damped sine wave monophasic waveform shocks. The aim of this study was to explore whether biphasic waveform shocks were superior to monophasic waveform shocks for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients in whom cardioversion of AF was indicated were randomized in this prospective study, to transthoracic cardioversion with either monophasic damped sine waveform shocks or biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks. In the group randomized to monophasic waveform shocks (27 patients), a first shock of 150 J was delivered, followed (if necessary) by a 360 J shock. In the biphasic waveform group (30 patients), the first shock had an energy of 150 J and (if necessary) a second 150 J was delivered. All shocks were delivered in the anterolateral chest pad position. Sinus rhythm was restored in 16 patients (51%) with the first monophasic shock and in 27 patients (86%) with the first biphasic shock. The difference was statistically significant (P=0.02). After the second shock, sinus rhythm was obtained in a total of 24 patients (88%) with monophasic shocks and in 28 patients (93%) with biphasic shocks. No complication was observed in either group and cardiac enzymes (CK, CKmb, troponin I, myoglobin) did not show any significant changes. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that at the same energy level of 150 J, biphasic impedance compensating waveform shocks are superior to monophasic damped sine waveform shocks cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.     

Initial energy setting, outcome and efficiency in direct current cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to design a more efficient protocol for the electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias. BACKGROUND: Guidelines for electrical cardioversion of atrial arrhythmias recommend starting with low energy shocks, which are often ineffective. METHODS: We recorded the sequence of shocks in 1,838 attempts at cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) and 678 attempts at cardioversion for atrial flutter. These data were used to calculate the probability of success for each shock of a standard series and the probability of success with a single shock at each intensity. In 150 cases, a rhythm strip with the time of each shock allowed us to calculate the time expended on unsuccessful shocks. RESULTS: We analyzed the effects of 5,152 shocks delivered to patients for AF and 1,238 shocks delivered to patients for atrial flutter. The probability of success on the first shock in AF of > 30 days duration was 5.5% at < 200 J, 35% at 200 J and 56% at 360 J. In atrial flutter, an initial 100 J shock worked in 68%. In AF of >30 days duration, shocks of < 200 J had a 6.1% probability of success; this fell to 2.2% with a duration >180 days. In those with AF for >180 days, the initial use of a 360 J shock was associated with the eventual use of less electrical energy than with an initial shock of < or =100 J (581 +/- 316 J vs. 758 +/- 433 J, p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSIONS: An initial energy setting of > or =360 J can achieve cardioversion of AF more efficiently in patients than traditional protocols, particularly with AF of longer duration.     

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two biphasic defibrillator waveforms for the conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

The overall efficacy of transthoracic biphasic shocks delivered for conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) has been demonstrated. We compared 2 different energy waveforms, either the biphasic rectilinear (BRL) waveform or the biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform, in the conversion of AF to sinus rhythm. The relation between energy required for the conversion of AF, the type of biphasic waveform, and patient characteristics were examined. Serum levels of cardiac troponin I were measured before and after cardioversion, as well as postprocedural skin erythema and discomfort. In this prospective trial, 101 patients (mean age 61 +/- 15 years, 72 men [71%]) referred for elective electrical cardioversion of AF were randomized to either a BTE or a BRL device. Shocks were delivered in a step-up fashion beginning with 50 J (then 100 J, 200 J, repeat 200 J, and then crossover to 360 J). One hundred patients were successfully converted to sinus rhythm (99% success rate). There was no difference in efficacy at any energy level used, regardless of the duration of the arrhythmia. In addition, there was no difference in cumulative success. Troponin I did not significantly increase after cardioversion, regardless of the total energy used. A positive correlation between skin erythema and skin discomfort after shock (24 to 48 hours) was seen with increasing cumulative energies. There was also a positive trend toward increasing energy requirements as chest circumference and body mass index increased. Thus, biphasic waveforms are safe and effective at converting AF to sinus rhythm. In this study population, there was no clinical difference between the BRL and the BTE waveforms.     

Novel rectangular biphasic and monophasic waveforms delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator compared with conventional capacitor-based waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.

AIMS: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of novel low-tilt biphasic waveforms in transvenous cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), delivered by a radiofrequency-powered defibrillator. METHODS AND RESULTS: The investigation was performed in three phases in an animal model of AF: a feasibility and efficacy study (in 10 adult Large White Landrace swine), comparison with low-tilt monophasic and standard capacitor-based waveforms, and an assessment of sequential shocks delivered over several pathways (in 15 adult Suffolk sheep). Defibrillation electrodes were positioned transvenously under fluoroscopic control in the high lateral right atrium and distal coronary sinus. When multiple defibrillation pathways were tested, a third electrode was also attached to the lower interatrial septum. The electrodes were then connected to a radiofrequency (RF)-powered defibrillator or a standard defibrillator. After confirmation of successful induction of sustained AF, defibrillation was attempted. Percentage success was calculated from the effects of all shocks delivered to all the animals within each set of experiments. Of the low-tilt (RF) biphasic waveforms delivered during internal atrial cardioversion, 100% success was achieved with a 6/6 ms 100/-50 V waveform (1.45+/-0.01 J). This waveform was similar in efficacy to low-tilt (RF) monophasic waveforms (88 vs. 92% success, 1.58+/-0.01 vs. 2.67+/-0.03 J; P=NS; delivered energy 41% lower) and superior to equivalent voltage standard monophasic (50% success, 0.67+/-0.00 J; P<0.001) and biphasic waveforms (72% success, 0.69+/-0.00 J; P=0.03). Sequential shocks delivered over dual pathways did not improve the efficacy of low-tilt biphasic waveforms. CONCLUSION: A low-tilt biphasic waveform from a RF-powered defibrillator (6/6 ms 100/-50 V) is more efficacious than standard monophasic or biphasic waveforms (equivalent voltage) and is similar in efficacy to low-tilt monophasic waveforms.     

Efficacy of internal cardioversion for chronic atrial fibrillation in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction

Internal cardioversion can restore sinus rhythm with energies below 6-10 J, often without anaesthesia/sedation. We investigated its safety and short-/medium-term efficacy in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) with left ventricular dysfunction (defined as ejection fraction < or = 40%). Among 34 patients with persistent AF who agreed to receive internal cardioversion, 16 had left ventricular dysfunction and 18 did not (the groups were similar as regards age, duration of AF and pretreatment with amiodarone). Internal CV was performed delivering 3.0/3.0-ms biphasic shocks between coil catheters using a step-up protocol. Sinus rhythm was always restored. General anaesthesia (administered only when discomfort was not tolerated) was required only in 2 of the 16 (12.5%) patients with left ventricular dysfunction. The defibrillation threshold was similar in patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction (10.2+/-6.9 vs. 8.4+/-4.9 J; p=0.37). Short-term (within 72 h) AF recurrence rates in the presence and absence of left ventricular dysfunction were 19% (3/16) and 6% (1/18), respectively (p=0.51). After cardioversion, all patients received antiarrhythmic drugs (mostly amiodarone in patients with left ventricular dysfunction and class IC agents in the remainder). With mean follow-up periods of about 220 days, AF recurrence rates among patients with and without left ventricular dysfunction were 50% (8/16) and 28% (5/18), respectively (p=0.328). We conclude that even in patients with left ventricular dysfunction, internal CV is safe and effective, minimizing risks from anaesthesia. Although these patients may have a higher risk of short- or medium-term AF recurrence, 6-month maintenance of sinus rhythm is possible in about 50% of cases.     

Single Shock Endocavitary Low Energy Intracardiac Cardioversion of Chronic Atrial Fibrillation

Background.Discomfort related to low-energy internal cardioversion (LEIC) represents a real problem in patients (pts) with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of our study was to verify if a single shock could restore sinus rhythm (SR) with a lower discomfort for the pt.Methods. Thirty pts with chronic AF were randomized to receive a single 350 V shock (15 pts) or multiple shocks of increasing energy (15 pts). Three leads were positioned, respectively, in the coronary sinus and in the lateral right wall for shock delivery, and in the right ventricular apex for R wave synchronization. Truncated, biphasic shocks were used. In the first group a single 350 V shock was directly delivered and a second 400 V shock was given only if SR has not been restored. In the second group, beginning at 50 volts the voltage was increased in steps of 50 volts until SR restoration. No patient was sedated. After each shock the pts were asked to rate their discomfort on a scale of 1 to 5 (1 = not perceived, 5 = severe discomfort)Results. SR was restored in all the subjects. In group 1 SR was obtained in 12/15 (80%) pts with the first 350 V (8.1±0.8 joules) shock, while the remaining 3 patients required the second 400 V (10.2±10.3 joules) shock. In group 2 the mean atrial defibrillation threshold was 346.7±29.7 volts (8.0±1.5 joules). Then discomfort score was 2.5±0.6 in group 1 and 3.3±0.6 in group 2 (p < 0.01).Conclusions. A single shock of 350 V restores SR in the majority of pts with chronic AF; by use this new approach, LEIC is tolerated better than the multiple shocks step-up protocol.     

Does p-wave dispersion predict the atrial fibrillation occurrence after direct-current shock therapy?

Supraventricular tachycardia attacks, including atrial fibrillation (AF), occur after both external and internal cardioversions. These attacks of atrial fibrillation after direct-current (DC) shock may be related to hemodynamic impairment, thromboembolic events, or enhanced electrical instability of the ventricular and atrial myocardium, especially in predisposed patients. In this study, the authors aimed to show the importance of P-wave dispersion (PWD), which lead the atrium to fibrillate, in predicting post-DC shock AF after external cardioversion. Thus physicians may be able to choose the patients with high risk for AF occurrence and apply some other therapeutic modalities to those patients. The authors identified 18 patients in whom an AF attack was induced by urgent or elective cardioversion for a ventricular tachycardia attack and compared these patients with a control group composed of 40 patients without AF in regard to some clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic parameters. Left atrial diameters were greater (4.3+/-0.3 vs 3.5+/-0.5 cm, p = 0.001), left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF) were lower (45.2+/-8.2 vs 54.9+/-7.5, p = 0.001), the energy needed for successful cardioversion was higher (166.6+/-59.4 vs 80.8+/-51.6 J, p = 0.001), and P max (135.2+/-7.4 vs 118.7+/-10.5 ms, p = 0.001) and PWD (53.8+/-12.2 vs 23.8+/-9.5 ms, p = 0.001) values were higher in patients with AF when compared to those without AF. Thus, the patients with higher PWD values had a greater risk for development of AF after a DC shock.     

Biphasic versus monophasic cardioversion in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation:

Biphasic versus Monophasic Cardioversion. INTRODUCTION: Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using monophasic transthoracic shocks occasionally is ineffective. Biphasic cardioversion requires less energy than monophasic cardioversion, but its efficacy in shock-resistant atrial fibrillation is unknown. Thus, we compared the efficacy of cardioversion using biphasic versus monophasic waveform shocks in patients with atrial fibrillation previously refractory to monophasic cardioversion. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty-six patients with prior failed monophasic cardioversion were randomized to either a 360-J monophasic damped sinusoidal shock or biphasic truncated exponential shocks at 150 J, followed by 200 J and then 360 J, if necessary. If either waveform failed, patients were crossed over to the other waveform. The primary endpoint was defined as the proportion of patients achieving sinus rhythm following initial randomized therapy. Stepwise multivariate logistic regression examined independent predictors of shock success, including patient age, sex, left atrial diameter, body mass index, drug therapy, and waveform. Twenty-eight patients were randomized to the biphasic shocks and 28 to the monophasic shocks. Sinus rhythm was restored in 61% of patients with biphasic versus 18% with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). Seventy-eight percent success was achieved in patients who crossed over to the biphasic shock after failing monophasic cardioversion, whereas only 33% were successfully cardioverted with a monophasic shock after crossover from biphasic shock (P = 0.02). Overall, 69% of patients who received a biphasic shock at any point in the protocol were cardioverted successfully, compared to 21% with the monophasic shock (P < 0.0001). The type of shock was the strongest predictor of shock success (P = 0.0001) in multivariate logistic regression. CONCLUSION: An ascending sequence of 150-, 200-, and 360-J transthoracic biphasic cardioversion shocks are successful more often than a single 360-J monophasic shock. Thus, biphasic shocks should be the recommended configuration of choice for all cardioversions.     

Reproducibility of internal atrial defibrillation threshold in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Several pharmacological or technical factors may affect atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) for internal cardioversion (ICV) in the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS: We evaluated the reproducibility of ADFT in lone paroxysmal (electrically induced AF, 10 pts, 51+/-4 years) or persistent AF (15 pts, 64+/-7 years). The AF pattern (F-F interval) was characterised before each ICV attempt. A first step-up synchronised ICV test (ICV1, biphasic shock waveform 6 ms/6 ms) with increasing energy levels from 0.2 to 20 J was performed by a dual-lead defibrillation system (right atrium-coronary sinus configuration) connected to an external cardioverter defibrillator. After 30 min of stable sinus rhythm, a new sustained AF was induced (>20 min duration) and ICV protocol was repeated (ICV2). The AF cycle length was recorded for 30 s from the lateral wall of right atrium in basal condition and before each cardioversion attempt. RESULTS: The mean values of AF cycle length before a successful shock were similar in both AF populations (paroxysmal AF: pre-ICV1 175+/-21 ms vs pre-ICV2 181+/-20 ms (p=NS); persistent AF pre-ICV1 194+/-25 ms vs pre-ICV2 202+/-15 ms (p=NS)). No significant differences were observed between the two successful ICV tests concerning intensity, energy and impedance levels. The value of ADFT energy was reproducible in paroxysmal AF population (SD differences 1.2, coefficient of variability 9.6%). In persistent AF group only the impedance was reproducible (SD differences 2.6 Omega, coefficient of variability 4.5%), but not the energy requirements (SD differences 9.6, coefficient of variability 44.3%). CONCLUSIONS: ADFT is reproducible in paroxysmal AF patients, while a high coefficient of variability is present in persistent AF, possibly related to different patterns of re-entrant circuits in the reinduced AF. This observation is important in order to evaluate factors influencing ICV-ADFT correctly in AF patients.     

Biphasic Versus Monophasic Shock Waveform for Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation

Cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) using traditional monophasic shock waveform is unsuccessful in up to 20% of cases, and often requires several shocks of up to 360 J. Based on the success with biphasic shock waveform in converting ventricular fibrillation, it was postulated that biphasic shocks would allow cardioversion with lower energy. In a international multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial of 203 patients, damped sine wave monophasic shocks were compared with impedance-compensated truncated exponential biphasic waveform shocks. Patients received up to five shocks: 100 J, 150 J, 200 J, a fourth shock at maximum output for the initial waveform (200 J biphasic, 360 J monophasic) and a final cross-over shock at maximum output of the alternate waveform. For each energy level, the biphasic waveform compared favorably to the monophasic waveform in successful cardioversion (100 J: 60% versus 22%, P < 0.0001; 150 J: 77% versus 44%, p < 0.0001; 200 J: 90% versus 53%, p < 0.0001). Success with 200 J biphasic was equivalent to 360 J monophasic shock (91% versus 85%, p = 0.29). Patients randomized to biphasic waveform required fewer shocks and lower total energy delivered; in addition, this waveform was associated with less dermal injury and no blistering. Biphasic shocks converted AF present for less than 48 hours with 80% efficacy, but conversion of AF present for more than 48 hours and more than 1 year the success rate was only 63 and 20%, respectively. The results of this study is similar to other investigations comparing biphasic and monophasic shock waveforms for conversion of atrial fibrillation. We recommend starting with biphasic energy of 100 J for atrial fibrillation of less than 48 hours duration, but using higher energies (150 J, 200 J or greater) when AF has been present for longer periods.     

Prospective, randomized comparison of two biphasic waveforms for the efficacy and safety of transthoracic biphasic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in commercially available biphasic waveforms. BACKGROUND: Although the superiority of biphasic over monophasic waveforms for external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is established, the relative efficacy of available biphasic waveforms is less clear. METHODS: We compared the effectiveness of a biphasic truncated exponential (BTE) waveform and a biphasic rectilinear (BR) waveform for external cardioversion of AF. Patients (N = 188) with AF were randomized to receive transthoracic BR shocks (50, 75, 100, 120, 150, 200 J) or BTE shocks (50, 70, 100, 125, 150, 200, 300, 360 J). Shock strength was escalated until success or maximum energy dose was achieved. If maximum shock strength failed, patients received the maximum shock of the opposite waveform. Analysis included 141 patients (71 BR, 70 BTE; mean age 66.5 +/- 13.7. Forty-seven randomized patients were excluded because of flutter on precardioversion ECG upon blinded review (n = 25), presence of intracardiac thrombus (n = 7), or protocol deviation (n = 15). Groups were similar with regard to clinical and echocardiographic characteristics. RESULTS: The success rate was similar for the two waveforms (93% BR vs 97 BTE, P = .44), although cumulative selected and delivered energy was less in the BTE group. Only AF duration was significantly different between successful and unsuccessful patients. No significant complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Biphasic waveforms were very effective in transthoracic cardioversion of AF, and complication rates were low. No significant difference in efficacy was observed between BR and BTE waveforms. Impedance was not an important determinant of success for either biphasic waveform.     

Efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a biphasic, truncated exponential shock waveform at variable initial shock energies

Biphasic shocks are more effective than damped sine wave monophasic shocks for transthoracic cardioversion (CV) of atrial fibrillation (AF), but the optimal protocol for CV with biphasic shocks has not been defined. We conducted a prospective, randomized study of 120 consecutive patients with persistent AF to delineate the dose-response curve for CV of AF with a biphasic truncated exponential shock waveform and to identify clinical predictors of shock efficacy. Our data suggest that the initial shock energy for CV with this waveform should be 200 J if the patient weighs <90 kg and 360 J if the patient weighs >/=90 kg.     

Defibrillation efficacy and pain perception of two biphasic waveforms for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation

Efficacy and Pain Perception of Two Biphasic Waveforms. INTRODUCTION: We evaluated the influence of the peak voltage of waveforms used for internal cardioversion of atrial fibrillation on defibrillation efficacy and pain perception. A low peak voltage biphasic waveform generated by a 500-microF capacitor with 40% tilt was compared to a standard biphasic waveform generated by a 60-microF capacitor with 80% tilt. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 19 patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (79% male, age 55 +/- 11 years, 21% with heart disease), the atrial defibrillation threshold (ADFT) was determined during deep sedation with midazolam for both waveforms in a randomized fashion using a step-up protocol. Internal cardioversion with a single lead (shock vector: coronary sinus to right atrium) was successful in 18 (95%) of 19 patients. ADFT energy and peak voltage were significantly lower for the low-voltage waveform (2.1 +/- 2.4 J vs 3.5 +/- 3.9 J, P < 0.01; 100 +/- 53 V vs 290 +/- 149 V, P < 0.01). Sedation then was reversed with flumazenil after ADFT testing. Two shocks at the ADFT (or a 3-J shock if ADFT >3 J) were administered to the patient using each waveform in random order. Pain perception was assessed using both a visual scale and a numerical score. ADFTs were above the pain threshold in 17 (94%) of 18 patients, even though the ADFT with the 500-microF waveform was <100 V in 63% of the patients. Pain perception was comparable for both waveforms (numerical score: 6.5 +/- 2.4 vs 6.3 +/- 2.6; visual scale: 5.4 +/- 2.6 vs 5.2 +/- 3.1; P = NS, 500-microF vs 60-microF). The second shock was perceived as more painful in 88% of the patients, independent of the waveform used. CONCLUSION: Despite a 66% lower peak voltage and a 40% lower energy, the 40% tilt, 500-microF capacitor biphasic waveform did not change the pain perceived by the patient during delivery of internal cardioversion shocks. Pain perception for internal cardioversion probably is not influenced by peak voltage alone and increases with the number of applied shocks.     

External cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients with implanted pacemaker or cardioverter-defibrillator systems: a randomized comparison of monophasic and biphasic shock energy application.

AIMS: External cardioversion (ECV) of atrial fibrillation (AF) may damage implanted pacemaker and cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) systems. This prospective study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ECV comparing mono- to biphasic shock waveforms in patients with implanted rhythm devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with pacemaker or ICD systems and an indication for ECV were randomized to receive mono- or biphasic shocks. Systems were tested immediately before and after ECV, 1 h and 1 week later with respect to device and lead integrity. Forty-four patients (71 +/- 10 years, 31 male; 29 pacemakers, 12 ICDs, three cardiac resynchronization systems) underwent ECV with antero-posterior paddle orientation (monophasic in 21 and biphasic in 23 patients). Pacing impedances were reduced immediately after ECV (atrial 402-392 ohm, P < 0.001; ventricular 517-496 ohm, P = 0.001) and returned to baseline values within 1 week. Ventricular sensing was reduced immediately after ECV (12.4-11.6 mV, P = 0.004). There was no device or lead dysfunction in any patient. ECV was successful in 42/44 patients (95%), cumulative energy was significantly lower for biphasic compared with monophasic shocks (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: ECV for AF seems to be safe and effective in patients with implanted rhythm devices.     

Monophasic versus biphasic waveform shocks for atrial fibrillation cardioversion in patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy.

AIMS: With transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF), biphasic are more effective than monophasic waveforms. We sought to determine the ideal energy levels for biphasic waveforms. Methods We compared biphasic truncated exponential waveforms with monophasic damped sine waveform defibrillators, in a prospective, single-centre, randomized (1:1 ratio) study. The study included 154 patients receiving concomitant amiodarone; 77 received serial biphasic (50, 100, 150, up to 175 J) and 77 monophasic shocks (100, 200, 300, up to 360 J), as necessary. Results First-shock efficacy was similar in the two groups (57 vs. 55%, P = 0.871, respectively), as were serial-shocks (90 vs. 92%, P = 0.780). Both groups received equal numbers of shocks (1.8 +/- 1.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 1.0, P = 0.921). In both groups, serum creatine kinase levels showed a small but significant increase. The increase was, however, higher in the monophasic group. CONCLUSION: In patients with concomitant amiodarone therapy, biphasic truncated exponential shocks, using half the energy, were as effective as monophasic damped sine shocks. The biphasic scheme was not more efficacious for cardioverting AF. In our population, a first shock of at least 100 J seemed advisable with either waveform. If necessary, escalating shocks must be performed, but ideal levels of increase per shock are still uncertain for biphasic waveforms.     

Marked reduction in atrial defibrillation thresholds with repeated internal cardioversion.

OBJECTIVES: This study was performed to assess the atrial defibrillation threshold in patients with recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF) using repeated internal cardioversion. BACKGROUND: Previous studies in patients with chronic AF undergoing internal cardioversion have shown this method to be effective and safe. However, current energy requirements might preclude patients with longer-lasting AF from being eligible for an implantable atrial defibrillator. METHODS: Internal shocks were delivered via defibrillation electrodes placed in the right atrium (cathode) and the coronary sinus (anode) or the right atrium (cathode) and the left pulmonary artery. After cardioversion, patients were orally treated with sotalol (mean 189 +/- 63 mg/day). Eighty consecutive patients with chronic AF (mean duration 291 +/- 237 days) underwent internal cardioversion, and sinus rhythm was restored in 74 patients. Eighteen patients underwent repeated internal cardioversion using the same electrode position and shock configuration after recurrence of AF (mean duration 34 +/- 25 days). RESULTS: In these 18 patients, the overall mean defibrillation threshold was 6.67 +/- 3.09 J for the first cardioversion and 3.83 +/- 2.62 J for the second (p = 0.003). Mean lead impedance was 55.6 +/- 5.1 ohms and 57.1 +/- 3.7 ohms, respectively (not significant). For sedation, 6.7 +/- 2.9 mg and 3.9 +/- 2.2 mg midazolam were administered intravenously (p = 0.003), and the pain score (0 = not felt, 10 = intolerable) was 5.1 +/- 1.9 and 2.7 +/- 1.8 (p = 0.001). Uni- and multivariate analyses revealed only the duration of AF before cardioversion to be of relevance, lasting 175 +/- 113 days before the first and 34 +/- 25 days before the second cardioversion in these 18 patients (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: If the duration of AF is reduced, a significant reduction in defibrillation energy requirements for internal cardioversion ensues. This might extend the group of patients eligible for an implantable atrial defibrillator despite relatively high initial defibrillation thresholds.