Viral infection abrogates CD8(+) T-cell deletion induced by costimulation blockade

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a single donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus a brief course of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) prolongs skin allograft survival in mice. It is known that prolongation of allograft survival by this method depends in part on deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells at the time of tolerance induction. Recent data suggest that infection with lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) abrogates the ability of this protocol to prolong graft survival. METHODS: To study the mechanism by which viral infection abrogates allograft survival, we determined (1) the fate of tracer populations of alloreactive transgenic CD8(+) T cells and (2) the duration of skin allograft survival following treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb in the presence or absence of LCMV infection. RESULTS: We confirmed that treatment of uninfected mice with DST and anti-CD154 mAb leads to the deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells and is associated with prolongation of skin allograft survival. In contrast, treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb in the presence of intercurrent LCMV infection was associated with the failure to delete alloreactive CD8(+) T cells and with the rapid rejection of skin allografts. The number of alloreactive CD8(+) cells actually increased significantly, and the cells acquired an activated phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: Interference with the deletion of alloreactive CD8(+) T cells mediated by DST and anti-CD154 mAb may in part be the mechanism by which viral infection abrogates transplantation tolerance induction.     

Evaluation of donor-specific transfusion sources: unique failure of bone marrow cells to induce prolonged skin allograft survival with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody

BACKGROUND: Treatment with anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) plus a donor-specific transfusion (DST) of spleen cells prolongs skin allograft survival in mice through a mechanism involving deletion of host alloreactive CD8(+) T cells. It is unknown if other lymphohematopoietic cell populations can be used as a DST. METHODS: Murine recipients of allogeneic skin grafts on day 0 were either untreated or given a DST on day -7 plus 4 doses of anti-CD154 mAb on days -7, -4, 0, and +4. Deletion of CD8(+) alloreactive cells was measured using "synchimeric" CBA recipients, which circulate trace populations of TCR transgenic alloreactive CD8(+) T cells. RESULTS: Transfusion of splenocytes, thymocytes, lymph node cells, or buffy coat cells led to prolonged skin allograft survival in recipients treated with anti-CD154 mAb. In contrast, bone marrow DST failed to delete host alloreactive CD8(+) T cells and was associated with brief skin allograft survival. Transfusions consisting of bone marrow-derived dendritic cells or a mixture of splenocytes and bone marrow cells were also ineffective. CONCLUSIONS: Donor-specific transfusions of splenocytes, thymocytes, lymph node cells, or buffy coat cells can prolong skin allograft survival in recipients treated with costimulation blockade. Bone marrow cells fail to serve this function, in part by failing to delete host alloreactive CD8(+) T cells, and they may actively interfere with the function of a spleen cell DST. The data suggest that transplantation tolerance induction protocols that incorporate bone marrow cells to serve as a DST may not be effective.     

Rat xenograft survival in mice treated with donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody is enhanced by elimination of host CD4+ cells

BACKGROUND: Treatment with a donor-specific transfusion (DST) and a brief course of anti-mouse CD154 (anti-CD40-ligand) monoclonal antibody (mAb) prolongs the survival of both allografts and rat xenografts in mice. The mechanism by which allograft survival is prolonged is incompletely understood, but depends in part on the presence of CD4+ cells and the deletion of alloreactive CD8+ T cells. Less is known about the mechanism by which this protocol prolongs xenograft survival. METHODS: We measured rat islet and skin xenograft survival in euthymic and thymectomized mice treated with combinations of DST, anti-CD154 mAb, anti-CD4 mAb, and anti-CD8 mAb. Recipients included C57BL/6, C57BL/6-scid, C57BL/6-CD4null, and C57BL/6-CD8null mice. RESULTS: Pretreatment with a depleting anti-CD4 mAb markedly prolonged the survival of both skin and islet xenografts in mice given DST plus anti-CD154 mAb. Comparable prolongation of xenograft survival was obtained in C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. In contrast, anti-CD8 mAb did not prolong the survival of either islet or skin xenografts in mice treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb. Thymectomy did not influence xenograft survival in any treatment group. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes from C57BL/6-CD4null recipients treated with DST and anti-CD154 mAb and bearing long-term skin xenografts revealed the presence of residual xenoreactive cells. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb induces a state of "functional" transplantation tolerance. They also support the hypothesis that both the induction and maintenance of graft survival based on this protocol depend on different cellular mechanisms in allogeneic and xenogeneic model systems.     

Costimulatory blockade induces hyporesponsiveness in T cells that recognize alloantigen via indirect antigen presentation

BACKGROUND: Blockade of T cell costimulation by treatment with donor-specific transfusion (DST) and anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) induces prolonged allograft survival in mice. This effect is due in part to deletion of host CD8 and CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by direct presentation. The fate of host CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation, however, is unclear. METHODS: We studied Tg361 TCR transgenic CD4 T cells that recognize alloantigen by indirect presentation. Carboxyfluorescein diacetate, succinimidyl ester-labeled Tg361 cells were adoptively transferred into syngeneic nontransgenic recipients and their fate in the peripheral blood, spleen, and lymph nodes following treatment with DST and anti-CD154 was analyzed. RESULTS: Treatment of mice with DST plus anti-CD154 mAb does not delete Tg361 CD4 T cells, but instead renders them hyporesponsive to rechallenge with alloantigen. Mice circulating hyporesponsive CD4 T cells also fail to reject skin allografts. The hyporesponsive state of the T cells is not reversed by the addition of interleukin-2, anti-CD28 mAb, or an agonistic anti-CD134 mAb in the presence of antigen. These T cells are capable of activation, however, as evidenced by in vitro proliferation in response to anti-CD3 mAb. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that costimulation blockade can induce hyporesponsiveness of host CD4 T cells recognizing alloantigens by indirect presentation, thus prolonging graft survival by a mechanism that does not involve deletion of alloreactive T cells.     

Alloreactive (CD4-Independent) CD8+ T Cells Jeopardize Long-Term Survival of Intrahepatic Islet Allografts

Despite success of early islet allograft engraftment and survival in humans, late islet allograft loss has emerged as an important clinical problem. CD8⁺ T cells that are independent of CD4⁺ T cell help can damage allograft tissues and are resistant to conventional immunosuppressive therapies. Previous work demonstrates that islet allografts do not primarily initiate rejection by the (CD4-independent) CD8-dependent pathway. This study was performed to determine if activation of alloreactive CD4-independent, CD8⁺ T cells, by exogenous stimuli, can precipitate late loss of islet allografts. Recipients were induced to accept intrahepatic islet allografts (islet 'acceptors') by short-term immunotherapy with donor-specific transfusion (DST) and anti-CD154 mAb. Following the establishment of stable long-term islet allograft function for 60–90 days, recipients were challenged with donor-matched hepatocellular allografts, which are known to activate (CD4-independent) CD8⁺ T cells. Allogeneic islets engrafted long-term were vulnerable to damage when challenged locally with donor-matched hepatocytes. Islet allograft loss was due to allo specific immune damage, which was CD8- but not CD4-dependent. Selection of specific immunotherapy to suppress both CD4- and CD8-dependent immune pathways at the time of transplant protects islet allografts from both early and late immune damage.     

Critical Role for CD8+ T Cells in Allograft Acceptance Induced by DST and CD40/CD154 Costimulatory Blockade

Donor-specific transfusion (DST) and CD40/CD154 costimulation blockade is a powerful immunosuppressive strategy which prolongs survival of many allografts. The efficacy of DST and anti-CD154 mAb for prolongation of hepatocellular allograft survival was only realized in C57BL/6 mice that have both CD4- and CD8-dependent pathways available (median survival time, MST, 82 days). Hepatocyte rejection in CD8 KO mice which is CD4-dependent was not suppressed by DST and anti-CD154 mAb treatment (MST, 7 days); unexpectedly DST abrogated the beneficial effects of anti-CD154 mAb for suppression of hepatocyte rejection (MST, 42 days) and on donor-reactive alloantibody production. Hepatocyte rejection in CD4 KO mice which is CD8-dependent was suppressed by treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb therapy (MST, 35 days) but did not differ significantly from immunotherapy with anti-CD154 mAb alone (MST, 32 days). Induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by DST and anti-CD154 mAb immunotherapy was dependent on host CD8(+) T cells, as demonstrated by CD8 depletion studies in C57BL/6 mice (MST, 14 days) and CD8 reconstitution of CD8 KO mice (MST, 56 days). These studies demonstrate that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T-cell subsets contribute to induction of hepatocellular allograft acceptance by this immunotherapeutic strategy.     

The complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) immune effector mechanism contributes to anti-CD154 induced immunosuppression

BACKGROUND: In many situations, anti-CD154 (CD40 ligand) monoclonal antibody (mAb) treatment is very potent in producing allograft tolerance. In accordance to our previously reported results, combined donor specific transfusion (DST)3 plus anti-CD154 mAb (MR1) treatment enables the permanent engraftment of DBA/2 (H-2(d)) islets into B6AF1 (H-2(b/kd)) recipients in all cases. It has been widely assumed that the MR1 anti-154 is a noncytolytic neutralizing mAb, and it exerts immune suppressive effects by blockade of CD40/CD154 signal pathway. In this study, we sought to test the role of complement dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) immune effector mechanism in MR1 anti-CD154 induced immunosuppression. METHODS: We have evaluated the contributions of CDC in the context of the potent tolerizing effects of DST plus anti-CD154 mAb treatment regiment in recipients of islet allografts. We have used CD40 knockout (KO) mice and complement C5 deficient mice DBA/2 as islet allograft recipients as well as cobra venom factor (CVF), a complement blocker, treatment. RESULTS: The absence of direct and indirect CD40/CD154 pathway signals does not prevent islet allograft acute rejection. Interestingly, MR1 anti-CD154 induces islet allograft tolerance in the absence of CD40/CD154 pathway. In a wild-type major histocompatibility complex (MHC) mismatched strain combination, DST results in accelerated islet allograft rejection. Combination of DST and MR1 anti-CD154 treatment prevents presensitization and permits permanent engraftment. However, administration of CVF abolishes the tolerance induction. Moreover, DST plus MR1 anti-CD154 regiment, a potent tolerizing therapy, does not prevent acute islet allograft rejection when complement C5 deficient DBA/2 mice are used as recipients. Thus, the mechanisms of the tolerizing effects by MR1 anti-CD154 are not limited to blockade of CD40/CD154 signals. The CDC immune effector mechanism contributes to MR1 anti-CD154 induced immunosuppression.     

Prolonged survival of neonatal porcine islet xenografts in mice treated with a donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 antibody

BACKGROUND: Combined treatment with a single donor-specific transfusion (DST) and a brief course of anti-mouse CD154 monoclonal antibody (mAb) to induce co-stimulation blockade leads to long-term murine islet allograft survival. The authors hypothesized that this protocol could also induce long-term survival of neonatal porcine islet cell clusters (NPCC) in chemically diabetic immunocompetent mice and allow their differentiation into functional insulin-producing cells. METHODS: Pancreata from 1- to 3-day-old pigs were collagenase digested and cultured for 8 days. NPCC were recovered and transplanted into the renal subcapsular space. Recipients included chemically diabetic nonobese diabetic (NOD)-scid and C57BL/6 mice that were otherwise untreated, treated with anti-CD154 mAb alone, or treated with DST plus anti-CD154 mAb. Plasma glucose concentration and body weight were measured, and xenografts were examined histologically. RESULTS: NPCC fully differentiated and restored normoglycemia in four of five diabetic NOD-scid recipients but were uniformly rejected by diabetic C57BL/6 recipients. Anti-CD154 mAb monotherapy restored normoglycemia in 4 of 10 (40%) NPCC-engrafted, chemically diabetic C57BL/6 mice, but combined treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb restored normoglycemia in 12 of 13 (92%) recipients. Reversal of diabetes required 5 to 12 weeks. Surviving grafts were essentially free of inflammatory infiltrates 15 weeks after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Combination therapy with a single DST and a brief course of anti-mouse CD154 mAb without maintenance immunosuppression permits survival and differentiation of NPCC in diabetic C57BL/6 mice. Successful grafts were associated with durable restoration of normoglycemia and the absence of graft inflammation.     

NOD mice have a generalized defect in their response to transplantation tolerance induction.

A protocol consisting of a single donor-specific transfusion (DST) plus a brief course of anti-CD154 monoclonal antibody (anti-CD40 ligand mAb) induces permanent islet allograft survival in chemically diabetic mice, but its efficacy in mice with autoimmune diabetes is unknown. Confirming a previous report, we first observed that treatment of young female NOD mice with anti-CD154 mAb reduced the frequency of diabetes through 1 year of age to 43%, compared with 73% in untreated controls. We also confirmed that spontaneously diabetic NOD mice transplanted with syngeneic (NOD-Prkdc(scid)/Prkdc(scid)) or allogeneic (BALB/c) islets rapidly reject their grafts. Graft survival was not prolonged, however, by pretreatment with either anti-CD154 mAb alone or anti-CD154 mAb plus DST. In addition, allograft rejection in NOD mice was not restricted to islet grafts. Anti-CD154 mAb plus DST treatment failed to prolong skin allograft survival in nondiabetic male NOD mice. The inability to induce transplantation tolerance in NOD (H2g7) mice was associated with non-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) genes. Treatment with DST and anti-CD154 mAb prolonged skin allograft survival in both C57BL/6 (H2b) and C57BL/6.NOD-H2g7 mice, but it was ineffective in NOD, NOD.SWR-H2q, and NOR (H2g7) mice. Mitogen-stimulated interleukin-1beta production by antigen-presenting cells was greater in strains susceptible to tolerance induction than in the strains resistant to tolerance induction. The results suggest the existence of a general defect in tolerance mechanisms in NOD mice. This genetic defect involves defective antigen-presenting cell maturation, leads to spontaneous autoimmune diabetes in the presence of the H2g7 MHC, and precludes the induction of transplantation tolerance irrespective of MHC haplotype. Promising islet transplantation methods based on overcoming the alloimmune response by interference with costimulation may require modification or amplification for use in the setting of autoimmune diabetes.     

A major role for host MHC class I antigen presentation for promoting islet allograft survival

The purpose of this study was to determine the role for CD8 T cells versus generalized MHC class I-restricted antigen presentation in islet allograft rejection and tolerance. Diabetic C57BI/6 (B6, H-2(b)) controls, C57BI/6 CD8-deficient (CD8 KO), or MHC class I-deficient C57BI/6 (beta 2m KO) recipients were grafted with allogeneic BALB/c (H-2(d)) islets. Islet allografts were acutely rejected in untreated B6, CD8 KO, and in beta 2m KO mice, indicating that neither CD8 T cells nor host MHC class I is required for allograft rejection. We then determined the efficacy of costimulation blockade in these same strains. Costimulation blockade with anti-CD154 therapy facilitated long-term islet allograft survival in both B6 and in CD8 KO recipients. However, anti-CD154 treated beta 2m KO recipients were completely refractory to anti-CD154 therapy; all treated animals acutely rejected islet allografts with or without therapy. Also, anti-NK1.1 treatment of wild-type B6 mice abrogated graft prolongation following anti-CD154 therapy. Taken together, results show a dramatic distinction between two forms of MHC class I-restricted pathways in allograft prolongation. Although anti-CD154-induced allograft survival was CD8 T-cell independent, an intact host MHC class I-restricted (beta 2m-dependent) pathway is nevertheless necessary for allograft survival. This pathway required NK1.1+ cells, implicating NK and/or NKT cells in promoting allograft prolongation in vivo.     

Mechanisms of Tolerance Induced by Donor-Specific Transfusion and ICOS-B7h Blockade in a Model of CD4+ T-Cell-Mediated Allograft Rejection

The inducible co-stimulatory molecule (ICOS) has been shown to play a critical role in T-cell activation and differentiation, and the regulation of alloimmune responses in vivo. Using an MHC class II mismatched model of CD4(+) T-cell-mediated rejection, we found that treatment of mice with DST and ICOS-B7h blockade induced long-term skin allograft survival and donor-specific transplantation tolerance. ICOS blockade, either during antigen priming or during the effector phase, previously shown to alter the outcome of the immune response, had a similar effect on graft survival. DST and anti-B7h mAb reduced the frequency of IFN-gamma-producing allospecific cells but did not produce deviation to a T(H)2 phenotype. In an adoptive transfer model using ABM TCR transgenic mice directly reactive to I-A(bm12), DST and anti-B7h mAb reduced the number of allospecific CD4(+) T cells and increased CD4(+) T-cell apoptosis. These data demonstrate that DST and anti-B7h mAb induces transplantation tolerance to MHC class II mismatched skin grafts by a reduction of the alloreactive clone size that is, at least in part, dependent on apoptosis of host alloantigen-specific CD4(+) T cells.     

Cigarette smoke exposure hinders long-term allograft survival by suppressing indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase expression

Cigarette smoke causes cancer and increases the vulnerability of smokers to infections. Epidemiologic studies have shown that smoking is one of major risk factors for late allograft rejection. Despite statistical data that associate smoking with allograft rejection, no any study has been conducted to prove that cigarette smoke directly causes allograft rejection in a cause-effect manner. In particular, investigation into immunologic mechanisms underlying smoke-related allograft rejection is lacking. Here we found that second hand smoke (SHS) hindered long-term islet allograft survival induced by CD154 costimulatory blockade plus donor-specific splenocyte transfusion (DST), although it failed to alter acute islet allograft rejection. SHS did not directly interfere with vigorously alloreactive T-cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro. Neither naturally occurring nor induced CD4+CD25+ Treg cell numbers were significantly reduced by SHS. However, SHS suppressed mRNA and protein expression of indoleamine 2, 3-dioxygenase (IDO) and its activity upon transplantation while IDO overexpression in islet allografts restored their long-term survival induced by CD154 blockade. Therefore, SHS prevents long-term allograft survival by inhibiting IDO expression and activity. Thus, our study for the first time demonstrates that SHS shortens allograft survival in a cause-effect manner and unveils a novel immunologic mechanism underlying smoking-related allograft rejection.     

Prolonged allograft survival in anti-CD4 antibody transgenic mice: lack of residual helper T cells compared with other CD4-deficient mice

BACKGROUND: Investigations of the role of CD4 T lymphocytes in allograft rejection and tolerance have relied on the use of mouse models with a deficiency in CD4 cells. However, in mice treated with depleting monoclonal antibody (mAb) and in MHC class II knockout (KO) mice, there are residual populations of CD4 cells. CD4 KO mice had increased CD4- CD8-TCRalphabeta+ helper T cells, and both strains of KO mice could reject skin allografts at the normal rate. In this study, transgenic mice with no peripheral CD4 cells were the recipients of skin and heart allografts. Results were compared with allograft survival in CD4 and MHC class II KO mice. METHODS: GK5 (C57BL/6 bml mice transgenic for a chimeric anti-CD4 antibody) had no peripheral CD4 cells. These mice, and CD4 and class II KO mice, received BALB/c or CBA skin or cardiac allografts. Some GK5 mice were treated with anti-CD8 mAb to investigate the role of CD8 cells in rejection. CD4 and CD8 cells were assessed by FACS and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: BALB/c skin on GK5 mice had a mean survival time +/- SD of 24+/-6 days, compared with 9+/-2 days in wild-type mice. Anti-CD8 mAb prolonged this to 66+/-7 days. BALB/c skin survived 10+/-2 days on class II KO and 14+/-2 days on CD4 KO, both significantly less than the survival seen on GK5 recipients (P<0.001). BALB/c hearts survived >100 days in GK5 recipients and in wild-type recipients treated with anti-CD4 mAb at the time of grafting, in contrast to a mean survival time of 10+/-2 days in untreated wild-type mice. Immunohistochemistry revealed that long-term surviving heart allografts from the GK5 recipients had CD8 but no CD4 cellular infiltrate. These hearts showed evidence of transplant vasculopathy. CONCLUSIONS: The GK5 mice, with a complete absence of peripheral CD4 cells, provide the cleanest available model for investigating the role of CD4 lymphocytes in allograft rejection. Prolonged skin allograft survival in these mice compared with CD4 and MHC class II KO recipients was clearly the result of improved CD4 depletion. Nevertheless, skin allograft rejection, heart allograft infiltration, and vascular disease, mediated by CD8 cells, developed in the absence of peripheral CD4 T cells.     

Changes in expression of T-cell activation-related molecules and cytokines during tolerance induction in an allogeneic skin transplantation murine model

Bone marrow transplantation after treatment with busulfan and costimulatory blockade with monoclonal antibodies (mAb) cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4)-Ig and anti-CD154 mAb or two-signal blockade using anti-CD45RB and anti-CD154 mAb are nonmyeloablative treatment regimens for allogeneic transplantation. There may be differences in the mechanisms of donor cell engraftment and reactive cell deletion by which these regimens induce donor-specific tolerance. Therefore, this study was performed to investigate changes in T cells and cytokines during tolerance induction toward allogeneic skin grafts. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice were used as donors and recipients, respectively. Skin and bone marrow transplantations were performed and busulfan was administered. Three groups were treated with mAb as follows: group 1, anti-CD154 mAb; group 2, anti-CD154 plus anti-CD45RB mAb; and group 3, anti-CD154 mAb plus CTLA4-Ig. The proportions of CD4+ or CD8+ T cells and the expression of CD45RB isoforms on splenocytes were measured using flow cytometry and the production of cytokines by CD4+ T cells using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Group 2 showed a significant reduction in the proportions of CD8+ T cells and CD45RB high isoforms compared with groups 1 and 3. The levels of interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-4 in group 2 were lower and higher than those of groups 1 and 3, respectively. In conclusion, the combined use of anti-CD154 and anti-CD45RB mAb decreases the CD8+ T-cell population and the expression of CD45RB, resulting in a Th2 cytokine profile, which may be a characteristic mechanism leading to donor cell engraftment and reactive cell deletion for donor-specific tolerance.     

Infusion of Lin- bone marrow cells results in multilineage macrochimerism and skin allograft tolerance in minimally conditioned recipient mice

Donor-specific immunological tolerance using high doses of donor bone marrow cells (BMC) has been demonstrated in mixed chimerism-based tolerance induction protocols; however, the development of graft versus host disease (GVHD) remains a risk. In the present study, we demonstrate that the infusion of low numbers of donor Lin(-) bone marrow cells (Lin(-) BMC) 7 days post allograft transplantation facilitates high level macrochimerism induction and graft tolerance. Full-thickness BALB/c skin allografts were transplanted onto C57BL/6 mice. Mice were treated with anti-CD4 and anti-CD8 mAbs on day 0, +2, +5, +7 and +14 along with low dose busulfan on day +5. A low dose of highly purified Lin(-) BMC from BALB/c donor mice was infused on day +7. Chimerism and clonal cell deletion were evaluated using flow cytometry. Donor-specific tolerance was tested by donor and third-party skin grafting and mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR). Lin(-) BMC infusion with minimal immunosuppression led to stable, mixed, multilineage macrochimerism and long-term allograft survival (>300 days). Mixed donor-recipient macrochimerism was observed. Donor-reactive T cells were clonally deleted and a 130% increase in CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells (Tregs) was observed in the spleen. Tolerant mice subsequently accepted second donor, but not third-party (C3H), skin grafts and recipient splenocytes failed to react with allogeneic donor cells indicating donor-specific immunological tolerance was achieved. We conclude that the infusion of donor Lin(-) BMC without cytoreductive recipient conditioning can induce indefinite survival of skin allografts via mechanisms involving the establishment of a multilineage macrochimeric state principally through clonal deletion of alloreactive T cells and peripherally induced CD4(+)Foxp3(+) Tregs.     

ICOS-Dependent and -Independent Functions of Memory CD4 T Cells in Allograft Rejection

Donor-reactive memory T cells undermine the survival of transplanted organs through multiple pathways. We have previously reported that memory CD4 T cells resist treatment with anti-CD154 antibody and donor-specific transfusion (DST/MR1) and promote cardiac allograft rejection via generation of effector CD4 T cells and alloantibody. We hypothesized that the helper functions of memory CD4 T cells are independent of T-cell costimulation through CD154 but instead are regulated by alternative costimulatory pathways. This study investigated how blocking ICOS/B7RP-1 interactions affects functions of donor-reactive memory CD4 T cells. Treatment with blocking anti-ICOS mAb synergized with DST/MR1 and prolonged mouse cardiac allograft survival despite the presence of donor-reactive memory CD4 T cells. While blocking ICOS did not diminish the expansion of preexisting memory CD4 T cells or the induction of allospecific effector T cells, it did inhibit recruitment of the activated memory and effector T cells into the graft. In addition, anti-ICOS mAb treatment in combination with DST/MR1 prevented help provided by memory CD4 T cells for production of donor-specific IgG antibody. These results demonstrate the potential efficacy of ICOS blockade in sensitized transplant patients and provide the foundation for rational use of ICOS blockade in combination with other graft-prolonging strategies.     

Anti‐TCRβ mAb Induces Long‐Term Allograft Survival by Reducing Antigen‐Reactive T Cells and Sparing Regulatory T Cells

TCR specific antibodies may modulate the TCR engagement with antigen–MHC complexes, and in turn regulate in vivo T cell responses to alloantigens. Herein, we found that in vivo administration of mAbs specific for mouse TCRβ (H57–597), TCRα or CD3 promptly reduced the number of CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells in normal mice, but H57–597 mAb most potently increased the frequency of CD4⁺Foxp3⁺ Treg cells. When mice were injected with staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) superantigen and H57–597 mAb, the expansion of SEB‐reactive Vβ8⁺ T cells was completely abrogated while SEB‐nonreactive Vβ2⁺ T cells remained unaffected. More importantly, transient H57–597 mAb treatment exerted long‐lasting effect in preventing T cell responses to alloantigens, and produced long‐term cardiac allograft survival (>100 days) in 10 out of 11 recipients. While Treg cells were involved in maintaining donor‐specific long‐term graft survival, T cell homeostasis recovered over time and immunity was retained against third party allografts. Moreover, transient H57–597 mAb treatment significantly prolonged survival of skin allografts in naïve recipients as well as heart allografts in skin‐sensitized recipients. Thus, transient modulation of the TCRβ chain by H57–597 mAb exhibits potent, long‐lasting therapeutic effects to control alloimmune responses.     

Both innate and adaptive major histocompatibility complex class I-dependent immunity impair long-term islet xenograft survival

Natural killer (NK) cells have long been appreciated for their rapid, proinflammatory contribution to host defense. However, more recent studies show an unexpected regulatory role for host major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-dependent immunity and NK cells in promoting tolerance induction to islet allografts. It is unclear whether the potential tolerance induction to islet xenografts follows similar requirements to those found in allograft tolerance. In this study, we determined whether induced islet xenograft prolongation also showed a reliance on MHC class I-dependent immune pathways. In particular, we tested whether NK1.1+ cells and/or CD8 T cells were required for the long-term islet xenograft survival in a rat-to-mouse transplant model. Short-term host treatment with combined anti-CD154 plus anti-LFA-1 (CD11a) resulted in prolonged, but not indefinite, survival of WF rat islet xenografts in C57BI/6 mouse recipients. In stark contrast with similar islet allograft studies, adjunct treatment with anti-NK1.1 therapy combined wither anti-CD154/anti-LFA-1 treatment led to long-term (>100 days) survival of the majority of islet xenografts. In parallel studies, we determined whether CD8 T cells also contributed a barrier to xenograft survival. Similar to results found in anti-NK1.1-treated animals, CD8-deficient (knockout) recipients also demonstrated augmented xenograft prolongation after combined anti-CD154/anti-LFA-1 therapy. Taken together, NK1.1+ cells (NK/NKT cells) and CD8 T cells constitute differing MHC class I-dependent immune pathways forming a significant barrier to xenograft prolongation.     

CD154 on the surface of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells contributes to skin transplant tolerance

BACKGROUND: It is known that the infusion of whole blood from donors (donor-specific transfusion) into recipients combined with anti-CD154 therapy can prolong allograft survival. It has generally been agreed that the effectiveness of anti-CD154 therapy is caused by the inactivation of alloreactive CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells. The recent literature has implicated CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells in the suppression of autoimmunity and graft rejection, and we therefore examined whether CD154 blockade is effective because of its blockade of inflammatory T-cell activation or because of a direct impact on the regulatory T cells. METHODS: RAG(-/-) mice were adoptively transfused with CD4+ T cells or a subset of the population (CD4+CD25+ or CD4+CD25- T cells) alone or in combination with donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 and given an allo-skin transplant. The longevity of the transplant was determined over time. CD154(-/-)CD4+ T cells were used to assess the importance of CD154 in graft rejection and acceptance. RESULTS: CD154 blockade (or loss of CD154) on CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells enhanced their immunosuppressive activities and was a contributing factor to anti-CD154-induced immune suppression in vivo. In a model of allograft tolerance, suppression was elicited by antigen and anti-CD154 or antigen alone if the CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells were deficient in CD154 expression. CONCLUSIONS: Neutralizing the function of CD154 on regulatory T cells upon antigen exposure induces heightened levels of suppressive activities and is likely a contributing factor to the long-lived therapeutic effects of anti-CD154 treatment.     

Evidence for tissue-directed immune responses: analysis of CD4- and CD8-dependent alloimmunity

BACKGROUND: Transplant rejection has generally been considered a CD4 T-cell-dependent immune process. CD4-independent, CD8 T-cell rejection pathways have recently gained attention because of their relative resistance to immunosuppression. In the current study, the role of the allograft tissue in activation of these distinct pathways was examined by comparing host-immune responses with allogeneic pancreatic islets or hepatocytes transplanted across the same genetic disparity. METHODS: To compare activation of CD4-dependent versus CD8-dependent alloimmunity, islets or hepatocytes retrieved from FVB/N (H-2) mice were transplanted into CD8 or CD4 T-cell-reconstituted severe combined immunodeficiency mice, CD4 or CD8 knockout (KO) mice, and anti-CD4 monoclonal antibody (mAb) or anti-CD8 mAb treated C57BL/6 mice (all H-2). The ability to immunomodulate CD4-dependent allograft rejection (in CD8 KO mice) was examined in the context of several mechanistically distinct immunotherapeutic strategies, including anti-CD4 mAb, donor-specific transfusion and anti-CD154 mAb, and anti-lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 mAb. RESULTS: The studies demonstrate that, whereas hepatocytes evoke alloreactive CD4-dependent and (CD4-independent) CD8 T-cell immune responses, allogeneic islets only activate CD4-dependent immune pathways. CD4-dependent host-immune responses initiated by pancreatic islet allografts were readily suppressed by a variety of short-term immunotherapies, whereas hepatocyte-initiated CD4-dependent alloimmune responses were not. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that immune characteristics of the specific allograft tissue uniquely influence the pattern of host immune responses such that the propensity to activate CD4- or CD8-dependent alloimmune responses can be distinguished. Furthermore, CD4-dependent immune responses activated by different tissues from the same donor strain are distinguished by their susceptibility to specific immunotherapy.